[HN Gopher] Paper vs. devices: Brain activation differences duri...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Paper vs. devices: Brain activation differences during memory
       retrieval (2021)
        
       Author : Brajeshwar
       Score  : 196 points
       Date   : 2023-12-04 04:04 UTC (18 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.frontiersin.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.frontiersin.org)
        
       | ggm wrote:
       | Link is 500
        
         | idonotknowwhy wrote:
         | Worked for me just now
        
           | marttt wrote:
           | For me, 500 on first try, but worked with refresh.
        
         | LAC-Tech wrote:
         | Author should have written it down and posted it to all of us.
        
       | ngrilly wrote:
       | Anyone here did see an improvement in memory retrieval after
       | switching from taking notes by typing on their computer to taking
       | notes on something like Remarkable?
        
         | AshamedCaptain wrote:
         | No, and frankly, the increased search and lookup time when my
         | colleagues can simply string grep them on their computers is a
         | a handicap.
         | 
         | That said, I have never been able to take notes on a keyboard.
         | I also find that physical notebooks not only are in practice
         | much easier to search, but I also have the impression that the
         | fact all your note pages physically still exist (and not
         | "disappear" after you change pages) helps recollection.
        
           | contravariant wrote:
           | Wouldn't surprise me if linking the notes to a physical
           | location aids memory.
        
             | teamonkey wrote:
             | That's the theory behind mind mapping.
             | 
             | As a side note, I feel mind mapping works differently on
             | paper than with something like Xmind. Xmind is for
             | organising and categorising thoughts by moving them around.
             | Paper mind maps are for helping me remember the
             | conversation when I wrote them; I can't seem to use
             | software for that at all.
        
             | falling_myshkin wrote:
             | Me neither. Memory palaces also show that this effect can
             | be emulated (not sure if that's the right word) in the
             | mind. I wonder if there is a way for computers to encourage
             | developing a 'mind map'
        
         | drbaba wrote:
         | I used to take some notes on paper (if it needed math and
         | diagrams, or for meetings that require eye contact), and some
         | notes on a computer (programming or pure text). My iPad
         | replaced the paper but not the computer.
        
         | wodenokoto wrote:
         | I think the kind of notes you can take with pen and paper beats
         | what you can reasonably do with a keyboard. And I think some of
         | the diagrams and annotated equations you can easily write on
         | paper creates a much better learning experience.
         | 
         | But computer notes are much easier to search. So for things
         | like meeting minutes, and daily todos etc, write it in a .txt
         | file. But when following along a deep learning course, write
         | the equations and diagrams on paper. Later you can write code
         | examples in your personal cheat sheet for easy retrieval.
        
           | ngrilly wrote:
           | I thought devices like Remarkable were doing automatic OCR to
           | enable search across notes?
           | 
           | Assuming search works, then I'd say a big advantage of pen
           | and paper is being less constrained in the layout of your
           | notes, and for example do diagrams. Big disadvantage is not
           | being able to edit, for example restructure your notes by
           | moving things around.
        
           | pbhjpbhj wrote:
           | I use OneNote and do some scribbled handwriting and quite a
           | lot of typing; mostly 'printed' in text from PDFs. I'm always
           | amazed at how it can interpret my handwriting, a lot of
           | people struggle with it (including me). It's not perfect, but
           | it surprises me sometimes.
        
             | Multicomp wrote:
             | The ability to attach multimedia screenshots, videos,
             | images, files, digital ink is what elevates OneNote to me
             | beyond Joplin, DokuWiki, LogSeq, Obsidian (all tools I've
             | tried and can see why they have such appeal) , and other
             | markdown++ notetaking applications, at least for my own
             | taste and usecases.
             | 
             | OneNote is not only a good notetaking capture tool, it's
             | also a great clarifying tool for general reference/project
             | support digital filing.
             | 
             | Whether the digital artifacts are text, handwritten
             | doodles, embedded files like multimedia or WIP digital
             | artifacts, screenshots of binary file hexdumps, the works
             | can all be stored together with relevant context, all
             | labelled and fitting into a 3-ring-binder skeuomorphism I'm
             | used to from organizing projects back in school in the
             | olden days.
             | 
             | Not the tool for everyone (especially those want to go
             | fully Linux Desktop) but its very close to having something
             | for everyone. Just gotta be able to do mobile and linux
             | with local notebooks.
        
           | grvdrm wrote:
           | Funny - hadn't thought of it this way accidentally used the
           | same approach for an actuarial task.
           | 
           | I was updating an insurance pricing application that had all
           | sorts of formulas for capital requirements, profit load,
           | minimum premium, etc. The formulas were often laid out in SQL
           | but I ultimately wrote them step-by-step on paper to make
           | sure I was truly following the logic (and order of ops).
           | Worked well!
        
         | pringk02 wrote:
         | Anecdata, but I've never been able to switch to using a
         | computer for note taking because I just get no long-term memory
         | retrieval. Typing notes seem to be like never having learnt the
         | thing. The search doesn't help because I don't even recall what
         | I do or don't have to search through. When I take physical
         | notes, I don't seem to need to look at them again, because I
         | will recall what was written well enough that their purpose
         | isn't as an archive, its for helping me retain something in my
         | actual brain.
         | 
         | Another anecdata point, I have ADHD. It affects memory in all
         | sorts of known and measured ways. I generally find if I can get
         | something into long-term memory then I'm set. Working memory is
         | terrible. Physically writing while working serves as a crutch
         | there too.
        
         | dboreham wrote:
         | I'm not sure about memory, but I've found that thinking through
         | problems is easier using a pen tablet. I use a Surface Pro X
         | mostly, but sometimes my Samsung Fold phone if that's all I
         | have with me. If I use paper, I lose the paper.
        
       | 6stringmerc wrote:
       | The amount of mental investment to write by hand versus type is
       | significant.
       | 
       | Technology assists are still rather primitive for English (you
       | can't argue with me on this it's the hardest language due to
       | amalgamations) but lazy gonna lazy.
       | 
       | My thesis paper on file from 20 years ago already set forth a
       | curriculum to address literary learning deficiency. Oh well.
       | Point being is I've practiced the hard way and if you only know
       | assisted methods I will eviscerate you. In fiction, I will always
       | be better than you.
       | 
       | Hey Alexa, how do I spell schadenfreude?
       | 
       | Note: I have 100,000 hours in literary pursuits ranging from
       | reading to writing to critique. Often mocked for my English
       | degree. The truth is English is a wonderful weapon far beyond the
       | grasp of the commoner and I will use it.
        
         | wesleychen wrote:
         | Except in this study they were comparing writing on a paper to
         | writing on a tablet so it seems that somehow the fact that the
         | writing happened to a piece of paper makes our memory better
         | and its not just the act of writing itself.
        
           | amelius wrote:
           | Maybe because mistakes are less expensive on a tablet.
        
             | tgv wrote:
             | That's testable, but if it turns out to have a benefit,
             | you'll have to implement that effect on all tablets and
             | phones, and make corrections more difficult (???).
             | 
             | However, I don't think it has a benefit: people don't
             | correct themselves on tablet/phone, so I think the cost of
             | a mistake is the same as on paper, namely 0, unless people
             | are really more careful when writing.
        
         | vasco wrote:
         | Right now you're using it to get downvoted on a random website
         | comment section so perhaps take yourself a bit less seriously!
        
         | dmvdoug wrote:
         | You will eviscerate me?! I need my viscera, good English major,
         | please spare me.
        
       | keiferski wrote:
       | This study appears to focus on short term memory, but for my
       | money, long-term memory is much more significant. As such, it
       | would have been useful to add a third option: using a SRS system
       | like Anki. I imagine it would significantly outcompete both hand-
       | written notes and digital tablet notes. A bit like the famous
       | Steve Jobs example comparing a human, a condor, and a human with
       | a bicycle. The condor (hand-writing) may beat the human (tablet),
       | but a human with a bicycle (SRS system) outcompetes both.
        
         | ezequiel-garzon wrote:
         | What's an SRS system?
        
           | suriyaG wrote:
           | I think it is Space Repetition Software/System
        
           | fermiNitambh wrote:
           | Spaced Repetition Software.
        
           | FrustratedMonky wrote:
           | Software that prompts you with information on some time
           | interval that allows for embedding it deeper in your memory.
           | I think the key was it would prompt you with the information,
           | just as your short term memory would be about to forget it,
           | and thus re-inforce it.
           | 
           | So some information X you want to remember.
           | 
           | It would prompt you with it at 5 minutes, then 20, then an
           | hour, then 5 hours.
           | 
           | I forget the durations, but it was based in some studies on
           | time before short term memory fades.
        
         | falling_myshkin wrote:
         | I don't understand your simile. The limitations of a bicycle
         | are infrastructure: bicycles can go a lot of places very
         | efficiently, but rugged mountain terrain without trails
         | (precisely the place condors thrive) would be difficult to
         | traverse. (this is totally off topic but now i am curious about
         | the energy efficiency of condor flight vs bicycle travel in
         | ideal conditions)
         | 
         | i find SRS very useful. but i personally think it is not well
         | suited to reference information. i'm skeptical of putting all
         | my appointments in SRS for example (maybe birthdays would be
         | worth it). or say I had collected a bunch of papers related to
         | a topic I was very interested in. I don't necessarily think I'd
         | want to memorize the list of them via SRS, but having the
         | titles written somewhere for reference would be great. I think
         | the point of this paper is that if that 'somewhere' is an SRS
         | card, it is almost completely devoid of context (other than
         | 'studying flashcards on computer' context), but if that
         | somewhere is a notebook that contains lists of papers related
         | to all the topics i'm interested in, it's much easier to find.
         | (though computers are good at searching fast)
        
           | keiferski wrote:
           | It was just an example used by Steve Jobs to show how
           | computers could enhance human capabilities.
           | 
           | Also, using a SRS in conjunction with a memory palace can
           | solve a lot of the reference issues you're describing.
        
             | falling_myshkin wrote:
             | this combo technique sounds useful, is it something like
             | reviewing memory palaces with spaced repetition, instead of
             | reviewing standalone information?
        
               | keiferski wrote:
               | Something like that, yeah. The idea being that you create
               | a memory palace or physical space, and then memorize a
               | map or route through it via spaced repetition.
               | 
               | Memory palaces are often recommended for reference-type
               | information, so I think this would work well. There are a
               | number of discussions on Art of Memory talking about
               | this:
               | 
               | https://forum.artofmemory.com/t/mind-mapping-memory-
               | techniqu...
               | 
               | https://forum.artofmemory.com/t/anki-to-load-up-a-memory-
               | pal...
        
         | tgv wrote:
         | One hour isn't really short-term memory, at least not in the
         | usual sense, and short-term memory is definitely needed to form
         | long-term memories.
         | 
         | Spaced repetition is an entirely different dimension. It
         | doesn't fit between the three mentioned modes. You don't get
         | spaced repetition when e.g. attending class or reading a
         | chapter. Instead, you make notes. That's what this study is
         | for, and anything else is a distraction.
        
           | keiferski wrote:
           | My point was more that if you're trying to decide which
           | method is better for remembering something (handwriting vs.
           | digital), the introduction of a spaced repetition system
           | (either software like Anki or a Leitner box for handwritten
           | notes) will outcompete either one that is used alone.
           | 
           | In other words, if your goal is to go fast: a bicycle will
           | outcompete a tricycle. But adding a motor to either will be
           | an order of magnitude better. At least that's what I think;
           | and so I wish the study had included this.
        
             | Probiotic6081 wrote:
             | > My point was more that if you're trying to decide which
             | method is better for remembering something (handwriting vs.
             | digital), the introduction of a spaced repetition system
             | (either software like Anki or a Leitner box for handwritten
             | notes) will outcompete either one that is used alone.
             | 
             | The study in question compared three groups (pen & paper
             | note taking, smartphone and tablet) on information
             | retrieval and note taking duration after reading a
             | dialogue.
             | 
             | Maybe I'm misunderstanding your point, but that systematic
             | spaced repetition will lead to better information retrieval
             | is kind of obvious and has a lot of literature to support
             | it, but how is it relevant to this study?
        
               | keiferski wrote:
               | Because the original link submission title was more about
               | memory and writing vs. typing. And so I was commenting on
               | the topic of memory as a whole.
               | 
               | Judging by the other comments, most people had the same
               | interpretation.
        
               | Probiotic6081 wrote:
               | > I was commenting on the topic of memory as a whole
               | 
               | You specifically said that the study was lacking a fourth
               | group (spaced repetition software.)
        
               | keiferski wrote:
               | You I seem to be posting hostile, unhelpful takes all
               | over this thread, so I think I'll end the conversation
               | here.
        
             | tgv wrote:
             | Studying isn't note-taking. It doesn't make sense for this
             | study to include it. It's a different modality, a different
             | task. If the study had included this, it would have been
             | tossed aside in peer-review. You can't compare across
             | widely differing conditions. An fMRI study also isn't the
             | appropriate way to compare conditions in very long term
             | recollection tasks, and get the result you seem to want to
             | get out of it: the proper way to do it is scoring the test
             | result.
             | 
             | The implicitions of this study are limited, as usual.
        
             | jyunwai wrote:
             | I agree with your thoughts on digital notes providing an
             | advantage with making flashcards, as they match with my
             | personal experience with learning new subjects.
             | 
             | I used to learn with handwriting more than digital note-
             | taking in the past, but I found it hard to convert the
             | handwritten notes into a flashcard format (the best I could
             | do was retype, or write the notes in a question-answer
             | format, scan them, and use the screenshots as flashcards).
             | 
             | By starting with digital notes, however, the process became
             | simpler for making flashcards for a spaced repetition
             | system--it became much easier to reformat the text for
             | digital flashcards. I then found it much easier to review
             | my notes in the future in a way that actively tested me,
             | versus passively re-reading my handwritten notes.
        
         | AngaraliTurk wrote:
         | Just a very small nitpick, but "system" is redundant when you
         | say SRS, as it would be like saying Spaced Repetition System
         | system.
        
           | keiferski wrote:
           | SRS = spaced repetition software.
        
             | AngaraliTurk wrote:
             | Spaced repetition software system? That's not the usual
             | meaning of SRS, but good to know some people use it like
             | that.
        
             | kolinko wrote:
             | A shoutout to SuperMemo here - one of the oldest SRS out
             | there. Their first version was on Amiga, if I remember
             | correctly, and the newest ones support iOS, use LLMs and
             | all the other tech :)
        
               | keiferski wrote:
               | I've never used Supermemo (still windows-only I think)
               | but the data on their blog is really awesome. The founder
               | basically pioneered the idea of SRS.
        
               | Tomte wrote:
               | iOS? No, certainly not. The recently released version
               | just did the jump from Internet Explorer to Edge support.
               | 
               | You probably mean the confusingly identically named
               | SuperMemo on supermemo.com (not .guru), that is indeed a
               | spaced-repetition software, but is not the venerable and
               | famous real SuperMemo with a gazillion of features and
               | research behind it. Just a simplistic knockoff. Strangely
               | by the same author.
        
         | Probiotic6081 wrote:
         | >This study appears to focus on short term memory, but for my
         | money, long-term memory is much more significant. As such, it
         | would have been useful to add a third option: using a SRS
         | system like Anki
         | 
         | Then you should go tell the journal editors that this study is
         | incomplete and didn't cover the type of memory you consider
         | more significant, hopefully they will retract the paper
        
       | BaculumMeumEst wrote:
       | I think it would be interesting to see a study on memory
       | retrieval for completing software projects with a dumb text
       | editor with nothing enabled, an IDE, and an IDE with copilot
       | enabled.
        
         | shinycode wrote:
         | I might also depends for how long the developer has been using
         | the tool. At university we first learned to program with pen
         | and paper to develop memory and thinking habits before doing
         | everything by hand with only vim and after that using and IDE
         | after +6 months to let the habits develop. Maybe if a
         | developper starts learning straight with copilot, some habits
         | will never form and things will never go into long term memory
         | ?
        
         | Buttons840 wrote:
         | I learned to program using Python with Geany, no autocomplete,
         | every single letter typed by my fingers; no auto-format either.
         | I was doing some consulting (I got a cheap consulting gig as my
         | first job) and wrote a daemon in Python, which ran for about a
         | year, then hit an edge case where I had misspelled a variable.
         | -_- After that it ran for several years, 24/7, no problem.
         | 
         | Now to my point: I learned Python far better than any other
         | language I've ever used, I think because it was the first
         | language I used seriously, but maybe it was because I never
         | used auto-complete in those early days?
        
           | GuB-42 wrote:
           | Or maybe because it is Python. I find Python to be a beginner
           | friendly, easy to learn language that steers you in the
           | "right" direction. I think it is the biggest factor that
           | explains its popularity. It is not a perfect language, in
           | fact, I don't like it that much, but you have to give credit
           | when credit is due.
           | 
           | With C++, you can have decades of experience and be
           | considered an expert, and yet, feel like a noob (my case).
           | Perl, a language that shares many similarities with Python is
           | also much harder to learn well. The "there is more than one
           | way to do it" philosophy has value, but not for learning.
        
         | falling_myshkin wrote:
         | i don't like _auto_complete, i find that the nondeterminstic
         | text changes on the screen are pretty distracting. however, I
         | do really like quick lookup of relevant names at my own will
         | from the editor. this is possible with even e.g. ed and ctags.
         | 
         | i'd wager nearly every development environment is integrated to
         | some extent, piping output in the unix shell is integrating.
        
       | apienx wrote:
       | I tend to write with more intent when using paper because I know
       | that editing is not really possible. Accessibility is also much
       | more limited on paper. However, I think of my devices and PKM
       | software as a second brain where I just offload information
       | knowing it can be accessed anywhere and anytime.
       | 
       | P.S. From TokyoU's Department of Basic Science (in an allegedly
       | predatory journal).
        
         | criddell wrote:
         | What personal knowledge management software do you use?
         | 
         | I've never noticed memory differences based on how I made a
         | note. I have, however, noticed that the act of making notes
         | helps me understand something (which isn't necessarily the same
         | as recall) and writing on paper works best for me.
        
         | maksimur wrote:
         | I wish it was like that for me too. I waste a lot of paper
         | because I have to strike or rewrite my notes over and over for
         | mistakes and changes of mind, even though I do my best not to
         | make them. I still didn't find a way to fix that, but maybe
         | it's just how my brain works.
        
           | FrustratedMonky wrote:
           | Think that is the key/point. Once you get frustrated at the
           | re-writing, waste of paper. That in-itself will start to
           | train you to think through your thoughts before writing them
           | down. It will help slow your brain down and conceptualize
           | things more fully first.
        
             | maksimur wrote:
             | I've been frustrated at it since I was a kid, but no
             | intervention seems to have had an effect on reducing the
             | waste. If I went through with thinking through my thoughts
             | before writing them I'd be stuck for a very long time
             | (potentially days) at best, else I'm back to square one.
        
       | halayli wrote:
       | I am not sure I agree with their participants sampling approach.
       | Memory and particularly short term memory is highly impacted with
       | people that have adhd/depression/bipolar. I am surprised they
       | went with random participants without assessing their mental
       | states and taking that into consideration.
        
       | HSO wrote:
       | NB: this is a Japanese study.
       | 
       | The participants wrote their notes in Japanese.
       | 
       | If you write on paper, you need to write out each character by
       | hand.
       | 
       | In contrast, if you write on a tablet or other device, the input
       | system will sort of "autocomplete" for you.
       | 
       | Therefore, more cognitive effort is required to write on paper
       | than on device.
       | 
       | It is fairly accepted that greater cognitive effort (either to
       | encode or to retrieve) is associated with greater recall.
       | 
       | So I would doubt the transferability of this result to western
       | context.
        
         | geniium wrote:
         | Very interesting difference. Thanks for pointing it out
        
         | makeitdouble wrote:
         | From the article:
         | 
         | > Participants in the Tablet group used a stylus pen, thereby
         | controlling for the effects of longhand writing with a pen in
         | the Note group.
         | 
         | In this specific study this is not a notable effect between the
         | Note and Tablet groups. For the phone group you're right that
         | it's a completely different input, while also being much more
         | painful all around due to the sheer device size.
        
         | gwervc wrote:
         | > If you write on paper, you need to write out each character
         | by hand.
         | 
         | Exactly like English or French. You also need to remember the
         | correct sequence of letters (see my remark below).
         | 
         | > In contrast, if you write on a tablet or other device, the
         | input system will sort of "autocomplete" for you.
         | 
         | Exactly like English or French. I didn't write half of the
         | letters used to type this comment.
         | 
         | I think you are searching for Japanese exceptionalism where it
         | probably doesn't apply. Remembering the correct kanji, and
         | graphy of said kanji is pretty much the same as remembering the
         | (wild) orthography of French or English words. I'm searching
         | quite often if a letter is a 'a' or 'e' (doesn't help that
         | cognates between French and English often swap those), the
         | conjugation of a verb or if a letter is doubled or not (again
         | often not the same for related words, for example _ennemi_ vs
         | enemy).
         | 
         | Your perception of the difficulty in-between writing systems is
         | twisted by the decades of education you got in the said system
         | vs the few years of learning another system with a second
         | language. When I see some soup of letters in Japan, it's clear
         | that the question is not just about one system being more
         | simple than the other.
        
           | redwall_hp wrote:
           | I've been slowly learning Japanese, mostly with Duolingo, and
           | that's a conclusion I've noted as well. People get hung up on
           | the "complexity" of even hiragana and katakana, complaining
           | about there being two many or those two scripts being
           | duplicates.
           | 
           | There are fewer total hiragana and katakana than there are
           | English digrams and trigrams in lower-case and capital
           | letters. (Because Japanese uses fewer overall phonemes...and
           | the characters are consistent in terms of pronunciation,
           | unlike English.)
           | 
           | I'm not very far into kanji (just some basic ones like Shui
           | or Ren  that stick) but the principles are solid: they have
           | shared stroke components (radicals) that related kanji share,
           | much like similar collections of letters, and studying them
           | as you study vocabulary isn't really any different than
           | knowing what an English word looks like on sight, without
           | "sounding it out."
        
           | getoj wrote:
           | Character amnesia is a unique phenomenon to hanzi/kanji and
           | is absolutely incomparable to English and French orthography.
           | Native Chinese and Japanese speakers learn characters largely
           | through muscle memory, which deteriorates rapidly if you
           | don't regularly write by hand. Many university-educated
           | adults are unable to write a supermaket shopping list without
           | hesitation.[1] Conversely, in English I learn difficult
           | spellings (Gloucestershire, syzygy, rhythm) by aural-mnemonic
           | tricks which stick around in my memory essentially forever.
           | 
           | Whether this had any effect in this study, I don't know, but
           | it certainly seems relevant that the experience of writing by
           | hand in Japanese is utterly different to any alphabetic
           | script.
           | 
           | [1] Don't take my word for it, here's an interesting blog
           | post on the topic:
           | https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=2473
        
       | chrisweekly wrote:
       | One thing I love about my reMarkable tablet is that I get all the
       | benefits of manual handwriting and sketches, enhanced by and
       | combined with digital flexibility (copy/paste, resize, undo/redo,
       | tags/metadata, search, retrieval, PKB integ and interop, etc).
        
         | geniium wrote:
         | The only thing I miss is the ability to spread my papers in
         | front of me to think with a global view and mix them and play
         | with them with ease.
         | 
         | This is something I never found in any digital product where
         | paper is unbeatable.
        
           | intrepidlemon wrote:
           | This could be achieved with VR although I don't know of
           | anything product doing this now.
        
             | Manouchehri wrote:
             | VR resolution is far too poor at the moment in my opinion.
             | 
             | At the office, I use 7200x2560 @ 144Hz (5x 27" vertical).
             | It'll be a few years before we see VR as a competitive
             | alternative.
        
             | ska wrote:
             | > I don't know of anything product doing this now.
             | 
             | I suspect there is no technology really capable of doing
             | this well yet, let alone product.
        
           | goda90 wrote:
           | I've seen so many sci-fi concepts of smart ink on paper.
           | Something you can leaf through like a book, but the ink can
           | be changed electronically. I wonder if we'll ever get that.
        
         | matly wrote:
         | Interesting. How is the integration of the reMarkable into
         | other ecosystems? Can notes be converted to text and used
         | elsewhere easily? (e.g. Nextcloud or Markdown docs)?
        
           | dartos wrote:
           | They have their own cloud service, but the remarkable runs
           | some kind of *nix. You can ssh to it over usb-c. They even
           | give you the root password.
           | 
           | Check out awesome-remarkable. I'm sure there's a way to get
           | next cloud syncing working
        
           | loughnane wrote:
           | I self-host rmfakecloud. Let's me back it up and not share
           | the data. Lots you can do with it from there, though I mainly
           | do it for privacy.
           | 
           | https://github.com/ddvk/rmfakecloud
        
         | funksta wrote:
         | As a big reMarkable fan, my first thought was how much the
         | results would apply to "digital paper". I can't think of any
         | reason why writing on its paper-like surface wouldn't confer
         | the same benefits.
         | 
         | Would love to hear how your PKB integration works!
        
         | bee_rider wrote:
         | I thought for a long time that I'd like some sort of Epaper
         | tablet. But I eventually gave up on that idea because I
         | realized I like my particular (not even that fancy, just
         | familiar) mechanical pencil that I've been using for ages.
         | 
         | I wonder if that is a well known or widespread phenomenon. The
         | people who would be most enthusiastic about a particular type
         | of device are the most invested in the previous solution, so
         | replacing it for the seemingly "best" customers is a
         | surprisingly high bar.
        
         | dash2 wrote:
         | I love my eink tablet, and it's definitely better and more
         | comfortable than my laptop screen or phone. But for some
         | reason, actual paper still seems even better. I'm an academic:
         | if I really want to study a difficult paper hard, I print it
         | out.
        
         | nomel wrote:
         | How does an iPad with an Apple Pencil compare?
        
           | ragle wrote:
           | I haven't used the remarkable but I bought a screen protector
           | for my iPad that's intended to yield a paper-like writing and
           | drawing experience when using the Apple pencil. It gets
           | pretty close I think.
           | 
           | N.B. if you go this route you'd need to replace the Apple
           | pencil tips a bit more regularly than you otherwise would
           | given the rougher surface you're "writing" on.
        
             | parkersweb wrote:
             | Interested in which one you've found works best to recreate
             | the paper experience?
        
           | criddell wrote:
           | They both have pretty good palm rejection and stylus pressure
           | sensitivity.
           | 
           | For writing feel, the iPad gives you a lot of options from
           | slick glass (the default) to many different screen protectors
           | with different trade offs for writing friction, glare, and
           | screen clarity. The Remarkable screen doesn't have as many
           | options, but you might not miss them. The screen is very nice
           | to write on.
           | 
           | For functionality, the iPad is much more advanced. It's
           | faster (less pen latency), has fantastic text recognition,
           | built in camera (which is great for capturing whiteboards),
           | color, slightly higher resolution, etc... You also have more
           | options for note taking apps. I personally use GoodNotes and
           | Procreate for almost everything.
           | 
           | The biggest drawback for me with the Remarkable is the small
           | screen. The big iPad has a screen close to A4 size which is
           | fantastic for reading and marking up documents. The smaller
           | Remarkable screen forces you to either shrink the document or
           | do a lot of panning. There are 13" eink screens (like the
           | Quaderno) and I hope the next generation of Remarkable
           | devices offer it as an option.
        
       | makeitdouble wrote:
       | One side issue on these studies is there's currently no control
       | group who spent their life solely on electronic devices.
       | 
       | Even as tablets are distributed in school from the primary cycle,
       | note taking and exams are all done on paper. This is not a value
       | judgment on wether it's good or bad, just that any further study
       | will be on subjects that spent their formative years writing on
       | paper, they better learn to be good at it and would fail their
       | entry into society if they couldn't do so.
       | 
       | Any conclusion that paper works better than electronic methods
       | comes with that asterisk to it.
        
         | bayindirh wrote:
         | > One side issue on these studies is there's currently no
         | control group who spent their life solely on electronic
         | devices.
         | 
         | I'm a statistic of one, but I started my digital mobile life on
         | PalmOS/Handspring devices. I still prefer pen and paper for
         | deep-thinking and future planning, despite having them
         | reflected in a digital medium later.
         | 
         | Tactility of paper, plus not being subject to a glowing screen
         | apparently changes something deep in my mind. No, e-paper and
         | stylus is not the same for me, either.
         | 
         | I finish two notebooks per year.
        
         | bee_rider wrote:
         | I think "solely on electronic devices" will never happen. But,
         | even ~10 years ago I had friends in college who did all of
         | their note taking on laptops. I sure there are kids who do the
         | same nowadays, right?
        
           | makeitdouble wrote:
           | I assume 20 years ago "desk work without ever touching paper"
           | would also have fallen into the "will never happen" bucket,
           | but here we are.
           | 
           | Hand writing will always be there somewhere, but paper going
           | away doesn't feel unconceivable to me.
           | 
           | There is a strong counter reaction to tablets ("screens") and
           | it's still costly (looking at the 12"9 ipad...), heavy and
           | and cumbersome, so small kids today who do most of their
           | writing on digital device would be a crazy small minority.
        
         | gnicholas wrote:
         | > _Even as tablets are distributed in school from the primary
         | cycle, note taking and exams are all done on paper._
         | 
         | My kid takes tests on the computer. And when I was in law
         | school almost 20 years ago, students mostly took notes on
         | computers, and tests were computerized as well.
         | 
         | I will note that when I was studying for the bar I found it
         | incredibly helpful to re-write my daily lecture notes by hand.
        
           | erikerikson wrote:
           | The general hypothesis is that increases in the count of
           | modalities used and intensity of use within each modality for
           | a task is, by definition, an increased engagement, more
           | completely triggering the adaptive mechanisms such as memory
           | and providing a more pervasive context into which the
           | learning can be woven.
        
         | ajhurliman wrote:
         | Does it matter? I know you won't prove "physical note taking is
         | objectively better in every scenario" but you can still answer
         | the question "which is better for humans who live and work
         | today".
        
       | zone411 wrote:
       | Interesting result, but I wish they hadn't used scheduled
       | appointments as the content of the note. I don't write down
       | scheduled appointments because I want to have them stored in my
       | mind, quite the opposite. It would be much more interesting if
       | they used something you want to learn and memorize. I expect the
       | result to hold, but still.
        
       | deafpolygon wrote:
       | I would imagine that in about 20 years, this will show a
       | different result. I feel it has strong bias due to how many of us
       | are raised during our formative years. When tech becomes more and
       | more common at a younger age, our brain will be different.
        
       | awinter-py wrote:
       | not obvious what app they're using to input appointments (from
       | skimming + ctrl-F-ing for 'app', 'software'). did I miss
       | something?
       | 
       | not sure why you'd blanket compare 'all digital input' to all
       | paper. surely the UX matters.
       | 
       | like is this some cursed psych study calendar app that integrates
       | with electrodes
        
       | aeschenbach wrote:
       | "Every time you write it down, you make another copy in your
       | head."
        
       | willsmith72 wrote:
       | i love studies like this, i've always found this to be
       | intuitively true, so my confirmation bias is like "YES", but i
       | hope there's more and more research into this.
       | 
       | smartphones are such a new technology
        
       | xivzgrev wrote:
       | I once wrote out a job hunting goal on a sheet of paper and read
       | it 3x per day for a few months, with "crazy" salary and
       | everything. And then, I got it.
       | 
       | I did similar thing later with multiple goals in Google docs.
       | Found that I'm not as consistent with it and haven't achieved
       | those same goals.
       | 
       | Could be consistency, more goals vs fewer, or the paper vs
       | digital
       | 
       | There's something about paper that feels more real. It also
       | forces some focus as you only have so much room on paper
        
         | digging wrote:
         | I find that any goals the exist inside my computer get
         | downgraded subconsciously because, physically, it's like
         | sliding them into a folder with everything else I do all day
         | every day. I can open that folder and pull out my critical life
         | goals or the doodles I did during a meeting or that cool
         | article I want to learn something from, etc.
         | 
         | However, prioritizing physical space for a goal affects your
         | real life. Maybe this doesn't apply if your written goal was
         | just in a notebook that is also used for other things, but if
         | it's on your desk, (and your desk isn't cluttered,) its
         | physical important also signals the brain.
        
         | Tadpole9181 wrote:
         | I'm sorry, are you saying putting "get a great job" on paper
         | and reading it repeatedly does anything at all to actually
         | getting the job?
         | 
         | Could it be that such a huge goal as "be successful in my
         | career" is just more important than the ones you put in Google
         | docs?
        
       | hn8305823 wrote:
       | This correlates with my personal experience.
       | 
       | If I take paper notes, I rarely have to go back and look at them.
       | Even then it's usually just to confirm my memory. If I take notes
       | on an electronic device, I'm far more likely to have to go back
       | and look at the device.
        
       | Shermanium wrote:
       | I recently bought an inexpensive fountain pen and have been
       | enjoying my list and note taking more.
        
       | anthk wrote:
       | Now do paper vs an environment like Emacs and not a passive
       | device.
        
       | joveian wrote:
       | Personally, I'm not convinced it is a good idea to make any
       | conclusions about reality from any fMRI study (I'm not convinced
       | what is being measured is all that important plus even
       | intrepreting what is being measured relies on complex
       | statistics). Also, for this kind of thing the outliers are very
       | important in tring to figure out what is going on. They show
       | individual data points and eyeballing them I don't really see a
       | lot of difference in the accuracy, with the tablet in particular
       | being slightly worse than nearly identical phone or notes (but
       | they had to pop out "easy questions" to make that difference look
       | interesting). Saying there is a difference between device and
       | paper just because the tablet condition did worse is misleading.
       | 
       | https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/634158/fnbeh-15-6...
       | 
       | They mention the difference in terms of location cues in the
       | conclusion section. I would guess UI choices affect the ability
       | to use location sense to recall information and I could easily
       | imagine the small menus of phones enhancing this effect (and/or
       | larger screens in general reducing the physical location effect
       | of the device itself). Taking a quick look on Google Scholar
       | there is some research on this kind of thing but I'm not seeing
       | any thing that pops out as a particularly interesting
       | presentation. Any UI designers out there who intentionally try to
       | trigger location sense in their design?
        
       | westurner wrote:
       | Algorithmically and physically-biologically, Spreading activation
       | has a (constant?) decay term:
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spreading_activation
        
       | daveguy wrote:
       | Nitpick: Figure 4f is an obviously incorrect regression line.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-12-04 23:01 UTC)