[HN Gopher] Chasquid - SMTP server focused on simplicity
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Chasquid - SMTP server focused on simplicity
        
       Author : mvolfik
       Score  : 63 points
       Date   : 2023-12-03 18:55 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (blitiri.com.ar)
 (TXT) w3m dump (blitiri.com.ar)
        
       | denysvitali wrote:
       | I'm a huge fan of Chasquid. The HAProxy protocol support makes it
       | easy to integrate in Kubernetes.
       | 
       | I uses to use this solution until a few months ago when I decided
       | that self hosting my mail server was too much work. To be fair,
       | it's not Chasquid's fault as operations there are basically 0,
       | but more of a spam / email reputation thing.
        
         | 77pt77 wrote:
         | Self-hosting email has been essentially dead for almost a
         | decade.
         | 
         | Even if you don't ever SPAM and send like one email a day on
         | average, you won't be able to get them delivered to the
         | recipient's inbox.
         | 
         | You can use SPF, DKIM, DMARC all you want, google won't care.
        
           | geek_at wrote:
           | can't confirm. I'm hosting a online registration software for
           | parent-teacher conferences and hosting all my mailservers on
           | my business internet line.
           | 
           | If you have DKIM,DMARC,SPF and the reverse DNS of the
           | mailserver is set to the correct domain you have no problem.
           | Well.. except for GMX and yahoo which frequently block me for
           | a few hours when multiple parents register at the same time
        
             | rfmoz wrote:
             | The security solutions on the mail system make a line that
             | you need to cross, but it doesn't guarantee a success.
             | 
             | It's a hard way to guess how good is the implementation on
             | the receiver, like GMX, Libero or other big country
             | providers with "historical" service that don't care about
             | them too much.
        
               | 77pt77 wrote:
               | GMX is banned in many places for example.
        
             | slowbdotro wrote:
             | I agree. Self hosted my email for over a decade and as long
             | as you do the recommended SPF, DKIM and DMARC you have
             | basically no problems.
             | 
             | Occasionally I turn up in spam when I email someone I
             | haven't before, but that's usually due to the .ro in my
             | domain and the forced text mode rather than html.
             | 
             | I've found problems only start occuring when you send
             | transactional email. User signups, notifications, etc.
             | Anything really automated.
             | 
             | I think people like to joke on self hosting email because
             | there are a lot of moving parts and it was hard to diagnose
             | why something went wrong. Until the last decade and early
             | 2010s there were no all in one self hosted solutions that
             | made it easy & available for most to do it.
        
               | 77pt77 wrote:
               | > Occasionally I turn up in spam when I email someone I
               | haven't before
               | 
               | Just proved my point.
        
               | 8organicbits wrote:
               | Last week I saw the same behavior sending email from my
               | work's Google Workspace account to my personal Gmail
               | account. The email stays within Google, I'm logged into
               | both accounts on the same computer, does Google think I
               | am I spamming myself...?
        
             | jamespo wrote:
             | Wait until you get on MS blocklist with no recourse
        
               | 77pt77 wrote:
               | Or on any other RBL because someone else in the same
               | netblock (maybe) did something suspicious.
        
           | rfmoz wrote:
           | Looking for help with Postfix configuration usually put you
           | in forums threads with almost +10 years.
        
             | sillystuff wrote:
             | postfix-users is active, and primary devs _very_ frequently
             | answer user questions (you should make an effort to go
             | through the documentation first).
             | 
             | https://www.postfix.org/lists.html
             | 
             | To get an idea without subscribing:
             | 
             | https://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/
        
             | kiwijamo wrote:
             | And thankfully the solution is almost always the same even
             | after many years.
        
       | intsunny wrote:
       | I'm amazed at how email server software is innovating and
       | evolving like never before. We have new implementations of SMTP,
       | IMAP, etc. We even have new protocols like JMAP thanks to the
       | Fastmail guys.
       | 
       | But it also feels like fewer and fewer people are running their
       | own mail servers. Everyone seems to just outsource it to Google
       | or Microsoft. I'm also surprised at how many engineers barely
       | understand how email works. (IE: I have to show them what email
       | headers are and the useful info that can ne found there.)
        
         | keyle wrote:
         | That's because email delivery is such a weird dance. It's
         | getting harder every year to have your mail delivered without
         | being part of those few services since the protocol is abused
         | so much.
        
           | Nextgrid wrote:
           | To be fair, you can relay through those services to work
           | around the delivery problem. It's still better than nothing
           | since they now only see your outbound mail, but inbound mail
           | processing & storage is still local & self-hosted.
        
         | HHC-Hunter wrote:
         | Quite frankly, it's just not worth the time or maintenance.
        
       | jsn wrote:
       | Apparently there's no support for smarthost / relayhost (or I
       | can't find any traces of it in the documentation). Running your
       | own low traffic mail exchanger without it is often not a pleasant
       | experience.
        
       | MitPitt wrote:
       | Does anyone know of an SMTP server which is easily usable with
       | Caddy? I find tinkering with certificates quite bothersome, and I
       | won't give up Caddy as I already host a bunch of apps with it.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-12-03 23:00 UTC)