[HN Gopher] Using Turbo Frames and Streams Without Rails
___________________________________________________________________
Using Turbo Frames and Streams Without Rails
Author : tortilla
Score : 48 points
Date : 2023-12-01 04:23 UTC (18 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (radanskoric.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (radanskoric.com)
| aantix wrote:
| The new Turbo 8 allows you to just re-render your page, and using
| DOM morphing, it will just figure out which divs to update.
| nickjj wrote:
| Yep this is really good stuff.
|
| The only concern I have is around making things more efficient
| server side.
|
| For example if you have an expensive DB query that's not really
| cacheable, you can use streams and frames to only have that
| query execute once on the first page load but then you can
| navigate between pages that only load in a different frame.
|
| A good example is something like a video course platform with a
| video frame, table of contents area and another frame below the
| video to load specific things like questions, references, show
| notes, etc.. As you click links in the table of contents, it
| loads new content in the video frame but the questions wouldn't
| change and you also don't need to re-render the table of
| contents either. You get to skip querying and rendering views
| for all of those expensive things.
|
| With Turbo 8, if you used the new approach you would be
| rendering non-cacheable very expensive queries and views on
| every page transition. I want to use Turbo 8's features so much
| but for the biggest and most complex aspect of my app I don't
| realistically see how I can. The bookkeeping pain on manually
| updating 5+ areas of the page and writing a bunch of stream
| hooks which is multiplied as you add more actions is real
| though.
|
| I'm hoping as Turbo 8 gets more mature new patterns will emerge
| to let us get the best of both worlds (performance and
| complexity compression).
| xutopia wrote:
| Turbo frames and streams are a wonderful pattern that I wished
| was used more than it is. We see people resort to whole React
| frontends for their web applications just to add simple features
| that could be done nearly for free using frame and streams.
| jadbox wrote:
| I'm not familiar with Turbo Frames, but it kinda sounds like Htmx
| approach. Can someone help me understand the differences?
| infecto wrote:
| They are in the same wheelhouse. HTMX is more generalized,
| Turbo/Hotwire is more opinionated. HTMX can easily be run
| anywhere in any language. Turbo is easiest run in Rails/Ruby.
| williamcotton wrote:
| I've used Turbo with a web app written in C:
|
| https://github.com/williamcotton/express-c/blob/master/demo/.
| ..
|
| https://github.com/williamcotton/express-c/blob/master/demo/.
| ..
|
| :)
| wilg wrote:
| I threw Turbo on a static site and did a little preloading and it
| seemed to work great. https://videovillage.com
| tortilla wrote:
| Nice looking site!
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-12-01 23:01 UTC)