[HN Gopher] He thought tending bar sounded like fun. Then the en...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       He thought tending bar sounded like fun. Then the entire kitchen
       staff quit
        
       Author : janandonly
       Score  : 68 points
       Date   : 2023-11-28 20:20 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (jasonstanford.substack.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (jasonstanford.substack.com)
        
       | genocidicbunny wrote:
       | I don't like the particular focus he puts on customers not
       | tipping well. He mentioned feeling like he's being nickel and
       | dimed to access his tips, but that's precisely the same feeling
       | we customers have now about tipping. I can understand why
       | customers don't leave a big tip at a movie theater too - the
       | ticket for the movie already paid for access to the theater, and
       | the food prices inside are also highly marked up as is. Asking
       | for tips on top of that is exhausting and annoying for the
       | customers.
       | 
       | He should have perhaps spent more time on the topic of corporate
       | profits.
        
         | doublescoop wrote:
         | This is a theater that has waitstaff that take orders and bring
         | food and drinks to your seat as you watch the show.
         | 
         | Don't want to tip, even though it's baked into the wage
         | calculation? That's fine. The author is just pointing out that
         | market forces means that folks aren't going to stay in those
         | jobs.
        
           | lotsofpulp wrote:
           | > even though it's baked into the wage calculation?
           | 
           | Then it should be next to the price on the menu:
           | 
           | $x + minimum $y tip.
        
             | Erratic6576 wrote:
             | Shouldn't they have to pay taxes if they printed it like
             | that?
        
               | mynameishere wrote:
               | You can't avoid taxes by not printing something.
        
               | woodruffw wrote:
               | I don't believe retail sales tax applies to tips in most
               | (any?) states.
        
           | demosthanos wrote:
           | In which case, the movie theater may have to switch their
           | wage calculations to actually pay these people for the work
           | they're doing. The up-front price for tickets might need to
           | increase, but that's preferable to the weird layers of hidden
           | fees in the current system.
           | 
           | Using tips as a substitute for paying a living wage needs to
           | be eliminated everywhere, but I especially don't blame people
           | for not realizing that a _movie theater_ of all places is
           | playing that game.
        
             | modzu wrote:
             | in canada wages have grown but tips have just grown too, so
             | there is seemingly a stronger cultural connection and its
             | not simply fiscal. even if everyone waiting tables was paid
             | a 100k salary, they can't just "put away" the tip jars. im
             | not sure how the insanity stops, maybe inflation will stop
             | it
        
             | fnordpiglet wrote:
             | Paying tips to a bar tender or waiter isn't some sort of
             | social anomaly. It's customary. Whether that custom is
             | wrong or not can be debated, but while it's customary, it's
             | reasonable for people to expect customers to follow the
             | custom. Going to a restaurant and tipping $2 is the sort of
             | stuff that gets your food spit in and is reserved only for
             | the absolute worst service - it's worse than tipping
             | nothing. That's the custom, wrong or not. Trying to change
             | a societal custom by screwing over the worker is wrong,
             | it's just punishing the person who can least afford your
             | social stand against how the business pays its workers.
        
               | tomrod wrote:
               | Does the same logic apply regarding which products are
               | purchased or boycotted for a societal improvement?
               | 
               | As a consumer, I make specific choices. If I am marketed
               | a price, that should be inclusive. The change starts with
               | my choices, since managers clearly are against setting
               | high enough wages.
        
               | notahacker wrote:
               | "Customary" works both ways. If it's "customary", then we
               | should probably also accept that the custom doesn't
               | involve tipping as much as the article author thinks
               | bartenders deserve if people generally don't tip as much
               | as the article author thinks bartenders deserve.
               | 
               | And a former state labor official of all people should be
               | blaming the employers for not paying a proper wage (and
               | proposing regulation to solve that) rather than the
               | customers for not making uncustomarily large tips to make
               | up for them.
               | 
               | (Also, in most of the world it isn't customary to tip
               | bartenders)
        
             | droopyEyelids wrote:
             | This is why I advocate getting the waiter's
             | venmo/squarecash and tipping them electronically.
             | 
             | This attacks the custom of tipping directly: It prevents
             | the management from being able to use tips in their scheme
             | to pay workers less, and absolves the customer of the
             | requirement to hurt the worker if they want to fight
             | against tipping culture.
        
               | CryptoBanker wrote:
               | Except tips are generally pooled and shared with the
               | busboys and the kitchen staff.
        
               | JohnFen wrote:
               | > I advocate getting the waiter's venmo/squarecash
               | 
               | I find the assumption that everyone uses such apps
               | interesting. For my part, I just tip with cash. No need
               | to bring a third party into any of this.
        
             | lokar wrote:
             | You say upfront pricing would be preferable but consumers
             | show over and over they pick based on the advertised price.
             | This is true in dining, flights, hotels etc.
        
               | wharvle wrote:
               | This seems more like an argument for _mandating_ up-front
               | pricing, than against up-front pricing. That way nobody
               | can "defect" and gain business by obscuring prices.
        
             | beepbooptheory wrote:
             | Sure, but until such things transpire we have an ethical
             | obligation to tip and tip well, right? Like, if you admit
             | there is a problem, it seems pretty bad to just focus on
             | the root causes without addressing immediate needs.
             | 
             | If you are about to run someone over in your car, you dont
             | just say "well, the speed limit shouldn't be this high
             | anyway.."
        
               | JohnFen wrote:
               | > but until such things transpire we have an ethical
               | obligation to tip and tip well, right?
               | 
               | I don't think so, no. I don't think there is any
               | _ethical_ obligation to tip at all, and there never has
               | been.
               | 
               | I am under no ethical obligation to be abused by
               | companies using their employees as human shields.
        
           | fullspectrumdev wrote:
           | To put it simply: the wage calculation is between the company
           | and the employee, not the customer and the employee.
           | 
           | The company socialising their wages out to their customers
           | via tips is fucking absurd.
        
             | huytersd wrote:
             | Meh I hate tipping culture as much as the next person but
             | you really can't run, for instance a dive bar, and pay the
             | bartender $15 an hour. The foot traffic doesn't bring in
             | nearly enough most of the time. The end result would just
             | be far fewer food and drink places which I wouldn't like.
        
               | changoplatanero wrote:
               | That's the whole point though. If the types of
               | restaurants that you like can't make enough money to
               | offer jobs that workers would accept then those
               | restaurants shouldn't exist. They can be replaced with
               | more profitable businesses that more people will enjoy.
        
               | s1artibartfast wrote:
               | That begs the question about what to do when the workers
               | will accept lower wage, and there is not a more
               | profitable business waiting to replace it.
               | 
               | I dont know so many people make those assumptions. If
               | there is a more profitable buisness, why isnt it there
               | already?
        
               | contravariant wrote:
               | If they are offered more than enough money to be willing
               | to stay and there's not a more profitable business
               | waiting to replace it, then what exactly is the problem?
        
               | thefaux wrote:
               | There is a relatively simple solution to this problem in
               | many cases: higher prices and buybacks.
        
               | droopyEyelids wrote:
               | I'm not following. If the bartender is making enough not
               | to quit, the money is there.
               | 
               | The accounting sleight of hand where they seem to pay
               | less for the food and drink but actually don't because
               | they must add a tip doesn't change how much income is
               | going into the establishment.
        
               | fullspectrumdev wrote:
               | Bar workers in my country get about 13$ per hour. And get
               | to keep whatever tips.
               | 
               | We also have no shortage of bars, tipping is entirely
               | optional and often viewed as an unwelcome American
               | import.
        
               | tomrod wrote:
               | Dive bars are like carnivals, then, and can only exist if
               | they extract consumer surplus.
               | 
               | I reckon there is a reason carnivals no longer thrive
               | with the advent of public parks. Perhaps similar
               | capitalistic creative destruction would occur for dive
               | bars if the incentives were changed.
        
               | s1artibartfast wrote:
               | I dont think that logic really follows. The cost to the
               | consumer foot traffic is the same if it is tip or wage.
               | 
               | If customers are willing to pay the price + tip to have a
               | equivalent $15/hr salary, they should be willing to do so
               | with just the price, e.g. $5 beers vs $4 beers +$1 tip.
               | 
               | Im sure there are some cultural issues around changing
               | the norm in the US, but it works out mathematically, and
               | there is evidence from all around the world where tipping
               | is not the norm.
        
               | ncallaway wrote:
               | If they can't bring in enough foot-traffic that they can
               | pay a bartender $15 an hour, then how is tipping going to
               | make up the difference? There's also not enough foot
               | traffic to make that work
        
           | huytersd wrote:
           | Don't deign to even remotely justify this tipping nonsense.
           | People should know upfront how much they need to pay with no
           | guilt tripping funny business. It also irks me to no end how
           | entitled someone bringing your food out to you can be.
           | Everyone works, no one else begs and shames people for extra
           | money.
        
           | tomrod wrote:
           | And that's okay! The wages should be increased, and tipping
           | should be put out to pasture.
        
           | JohnFen wrote:
           | > The author is just pointing out that market forces means
           | that folks aren't going to stay in those jobs.
           | 
           | Not tipping is effectively using those same market forces to
           | fix the disaster that tipping has become. If folks aren't
           | going to stay in jobs because they don't make enough money
           | from tips, then that will pressure employers to pay people
           | better.
        
           | ncallaway wrote:
           | > The author is just pointing out that market forces means
           | that folks aren't going to stay in those jobs.
           | 
           | Fun fact: that's the *business'* problem. As a customer, if
           | you don't pay your staff, which means your business has
           | shitty service, I'm just not going to come back.
           | 
           | Pay your staff a living fucking wage.
        
         | woodruffw wrote:
         | I think it's an understandable focus: as a service worker, his
         | most immediate recourse is to the people whose money he's
         | handling.
         | 
         | (That doesn't make your point about corporate profits wrong.)
        
         | m463 wrote:
         | I think the tipping system is kind of a scam that the employer
         | benefits from, then gradually feels entitled to as theirs.
        
           | woodruffw wrote:
           | Most people feel entitled to the value of their labor;
           | tipping is merely the incidental mechanism that yields that
           | value.
           | 
           | Put another way: we don't have any reason to believe that the
           | author is abstractly "pro" tipping, only that he (shrewdly,
           | like most people) recognizes tipping as a local optima that
           | he has no real control over as a service worker.
        
             | changoplatanero wrote:
             | The only way to reach the global optimum of no tipping and
             | higher wages would be for customers to start to refuse to
             | give tips.
        
               | woodruffw wrote:
               | Not really. That only punishes the worker, not the
               | interested business.
               | 
               | Tipping is pernicious _precisely because_ it doesn 't
               | have a real disincentive in a culture that's already
               | normalized it. The only real solution is unilateral
               | legislation, without waiting for the culture to change.
        
         | Glyptodon wrote:
         | I agree you don't tip tickets, but in the US tipping bartenders
         | per drink is pretty standard. So is tipping if you get food
         | brought out to you by a server... with the caveat that usually
         | this goes along with paying _after_ you eat, which maybe isn 't
         | the case here and might lead to no tipping.
         | 
         | I do agree a movie theater is an unusual place to complain
         | about tips, and even though distributing them via prepaid card
         | is complete scumfuckery, it's not the central problem.
        
         | abeppu wrote:
         | I get the frustration with tips for things that are low-touch.
         | When you go to a place that doesn't have waiter service, or you
         | get a prepared item to go and the cashier who you interacted
         | with for 5 seconds turns around tablet that asks for a tip, I'm
         | annoyed -- but this is a place that lets you order an
         | customized cocktail, and have a waiter bring food to your seat.
         | If you think the food is overpriced, don't order it.
        
       | dogleash wrote:
       | > The combination of working this front-line service industry job
       | and my last gig running a state labor department has led to some
       | interesting observations.
       | 
       | It's always funny when I'm acutely reminded how disconnected
       | well-to-do people can be.
        
         | fishtacos wrote:
         | What is funny about it? He's reflecting on the low wages v.
         | amount of work involved to make those wages worth his time.
         | Every one has their limits, but well-to-do people working low
         | paying jobs (in his case, personal and external factors) are a
         | good indicator how much discrepancy exists in terms of work
         | effort v. minimally accomodating income comes their way in
         | return. Thus the worker shortage and BS argument that people
         | don't want to work.
         | 
         | Blue collar work deserves a living wage. Austin, at least in
         | the area he works in, has an average of 110,000 USD/y, yet the
         | workers can barely survive living with roommates 40 minutes
         | away. That's 80 minutes of your life just driving in addition
         | to menial income - average that out and it's even worse.
         | 
         | Texas is embarrassingly low in its minimum wage laws. Why is it
         | acceptable for a base wage of 2.13 USD/h for waiters when
         | considering the cost of living has increased across the board
         | in every way? Where does the disconnect lie here? Why is it
         | acceptable that minimum wage is stil 7.35 USD/h, which decides
         | how much the "higher" paying blue collar jobs pay in
         | comparison?
         | 
         | You are exhibiting what I would consider an elitist mentality.
        
           | lotsofpulp wrote:
           | >Why is it acceptable that minimum wage is stil 7.35 USD/h,
           | which decides how much the "higher" paying blue collar jobs
           | pay in comparison?
           | 
           | It has been a long time since the minimum wage decided
           | anything, even in Texas. And in states that have not updated
           | their minimum wage, it is because the voters are not voting
           | for leaders that will raise the minimum wage. And those same
           | voters are sending Senators and Representatives to the
           | federal Congress, where again, they do not raise the minimum
           | wage.
        
       | TomK32 wrote:
       | Previous discussion with 444 comments
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30023074
        
       | arolihas wrote:
       | We're supposed to tip at movie theaters?
        
         | mcphage wrote:
         | Well, if the movie theater has bartenders, then yes--you tip
         | bartenders, and other wait staff.
         | 
         | If it's just someone selling snacks behind a counter, then I'd
         | say no.
        
           | njovin wrote:
           | Imagine that I go to a movie theater and order a soda and a
           | beer.
           | 
           | The cashier pours the soda into a cup from the fountain
           | machine.
           | 
           | The bartender pours the beer into a plastic pint from a tap.
           | 
           | Why is the bartender deserving of a tip in this scenario?
        
             | woodruffw wrote:
             | The "stupid" answer is because it's customary in (much of)
             | the US to tip a bartender, even if that bartender is just
             | serving you a beer.
             | 
             | Tipping is both economic and customary in nature; you'll
             | find that most people agree that the economics that
             | encourage it are dumb, but that the dumbness of those
             | economics doesn't make changing customs easy.
        
         | pavel_lishin wrote:
         | This is a theater that also serves dinner with the show; think
         | of it less like a movie theater, and more like a restaurant
         | that happens to show a movie.
        
           | tomrod wrote:
           | Nope. I paid the movie ticket. Wage is in that $20-$30 dollar
           | ticket price.
           | 
           | I don't pay to enter restaurants either.
        
         | tomrod wrote:
         | Nope.
        
         | bnchrch wrote:
         | Hard to see the forest from behind that tree.
        
       | lwhalen wrote:
       | This is wonderful. "Professional politician gets real job after
       | getting run out of town on a rail for Covid tyranny, realizes
       | 'gee, working for a living is tough!', tries to cash in on that
       | sweet, sweet, substack blogging-money"
       | 
       | We truly live in the wildest timeline.
        
         | woodruffw wrote:
         | I'll respond to the only substantive part of your comment: this
         | looks like a guest post on someone else's blog, so he probably
         | isn't making any money on it.
        
         | pavel_lishin wrote:
         | Covid tyranny?
        
         | jjulius wrote:
         | >... after getting run out of town on a rail for Covid
         | tyranny...
         | 
         | This feels disingenuous. McCamley ran the department
         | responsible for overseeing unemployment claims, and it was
         | death threats related to those unemployment claims that
         | prompted him to leave town. I'd be genuinely curious to see if
         | you have something that ties this to COVID specifically.
         | 
         | >... tries to cash in on that sweet, sweet, substack blogging-
         | money
         | 
         | Kinda hard to do that when you're essentially the guest
         | commentator on someone else's Substack, though, no?
         | 
         | >We truly live in the wildest timeline.
         | 
         | Yeah, timelines where people flippantly throw out factually
         | incorrect hot takes _are_ pretty wild.
        
       | justsomehnguy wrote:
       | > Staff rely on tips because wages are not at a living level
       | 
       | Fucking lol.
       | 
       | > Crap like this is so demoralizing
       | 
       | Yes, but not because people don't tip.
       | 
       | > because workers need the money to live
       | 
       | Yet the capitalist who _don 't want_ to pay a living level wage
       | is totally not the reason workers need tips.
        
         | fishtacos wrote:
         | What's the difference? The end result is the same for the
         | worker.
        
           | njovin wrote:
           | The difference is that the by allowing business to pay under
           | minimum wage (in some states), the business get to create an
           | adversarial relationship between the staff and the customers,
           | and blame the customers when staff don't make as much money
           | as they'd hoped.
           | 
           | This is IMO bad for everyone's happiness. Servers get upset
           | with customers for not tipping enough and customers get to
           | feel pressure and anxiety over tipping.
           | 
           | Compare that to a world where the employer has to actually
           | pay their employees their full wage (like literally every
           | other industry), and now you have predictable wages and less
           | friction throughout the dining experience.
        
         | petsfed wrote:
         | I think there is an element of shitty consumer behavior here.
         | 
         | Its axiomatic: people want to pay as little as possible. But
         | there's a certain kind of consumer, who goes out of their way
         | to flaunt that while they _could_ pay more, they 're not going
         | to. And its not because the extra $10 for a reasonable tip
         | would break them. Its not because they fundamentally disagree
         | with the concept of tipping (although that may well be the case
         | in addition). Its because the person "tipping" believes that no
         | adult should be working at a movie theater, and if they wanted
         | to make real money, they'd get a real fucking job, and no, I'm
         | not taking resumes, why would I want to hire somebody who could
         | only get a job pouring beers at a movie theater?!
         | 
         | Its really hard to overstate the antipathy that service sector
         | employees experience on a regular basis, and how far out of
         | their way certain customers will go to make sure that those
         | employees _know_ that those certain customers hold them in
         | utter contempt.
        
       | TuringNYC wrote:
       | The problem is that wealthy liberals and conservatives are in on
       | a long-con against the American worker class. They want to
       | pretend Inflation doesnt exist or has been conquered (e.g.,
       | https://x.com/paulkrugman/status/1712494317024026761?s=20) but
       | refuse to reconcile that against fundamental numbers -- you
       | cannot make ends meet with the current minimum wages.
       | 
       | ZIRP has been disastrous for everyone except leveraged asset
       | owners (i.e., the wealthy). Assets inflated in price, rents rose
       | commensurately, and we all pretended things were OK because of
       | ZIRP and "fixed" it with further leverage to maintain
       | affordability.
        
         | doublespanner wrote:
         | I feel like a focus on minimum wages is misplaced, it's hiding
         | the real problem that is the value of labour has been diluted.
         | 
         | The minimum wage should be set based on determining the rate a
         | sound minded well informed advocate could negotiate for the
         | work. That is preventing exploitation. It should not be used to
         | try to set a living wage, because as we have seen, this just
         | leads to the COL increasing for everyone... Leading to a
         | greater concentration of wealth as the average person now has
         | less ability to save.
        
       | metadat wrote:
       | (2022)
       | 
       | Edit: @fishtacos, haha.. now I can't delete it bc you replied (;
        
         | fishtacos wrote:
         | Read above.
        
       | cibyr wrote:
       | (2022)
        
         | fishtacos wrote:
         | TX still pays 2.13/h for wait staff + tips, with a guarantee of
         | bi-weekly guarantee of 7.35/h if tips don't make up for it.
         | 2023 is still the same.
        
           | tomrod wrote:
           | Texas (and other places) gets a lot of labor complaints too
           | for stiffing this.
           | 
           | https://www.epi.org/publication/employers-steal-billions-
           | fro...
        
             | fishtacos wrote:
             | I waited tables before, during and slighly after college,
             | in TX. This was well-known, but am glad it's at least
             | reported, even if not addressed. The entitled replies here
             | are embarrassing.
        
               | tomrod wrote:
               | For me, I'm antitipping culture, but realize the only way
               | it changes is when the servers, line cooks, cashiers, and
               | hostesses as a working class group get fed up and demand
               | better.
               | 
               | Until then, it's a revolving door, and vested interests
               | target to make customers and wait staff angry at each
               | other.
        
       | icameron wrote:
       | What is this referring to in the article?
       | 
       | > The benefit situation is no better. Workers get to see free
       | movies when theaters aren't busy, and get half off of meals
       | purchased while at work. But that doesn't help when you need to
       | see a doctor or get a prescription (Thank you Obama for your
       | Care).
       | 
       | Wasn't the cornerstone of the Obama plan a mandated health
       | insurance by employers, but it was gutted by the next opposition
       | congress?
        
         | dataflow wrote:
         | Yeah I came to ask a similar question, I'm confused what this
         | had to do with Obamacare.
        
         | bink wrote:
         | I assumed he was referring to the ability now for people to buy
         | individual healthcare plans that are subsidized by the
         | government, whereas they couldn't before. But I admit it isn't
         | very clear.
        
         | djur wrote:
         | The ACA employer mandate is still in place (it's the individual
         | mandate that has been zeroed out). Maybe this guy isn't a full-
         | time worker?
        
         | gurchik wrote:
         | If I recall correctly, the ACA only ever required employers
         | with 50 or more full time employees to offer coverage to their
         | full time employees. As I understand it, this mandate was
         | delayed a couple times but it eventually stuck. But that is
         | moot considering a huge portion of workers in the food service
         | industry don't meet that criteria (either not full time or the
         | employer has fewer than 50 employees) so they don't get any
         | employer coverage. I'm not sure what the author meant by the
         | "Thank you Obama" comment - is he criticizing the ACA for not
         | going further with the mandatory coverage, or is this just a
         | reference to the "thanks Obama" meme?
        
       | JohnMakin wrote:
       | > Labor is supposed to have value. A good days' work deserves a
       | good days' pay.
       | 
       | Society by and large does _not_ believe this. If you dig into it
       | a little bit, asking why fast-food workers and the people that
       | serve them their starbucks shouldn 't make more money, the answer
       | always boils down to "I need people that serve me to be
       | socioeconomically inferior to me"
        
         | not-my-account wrote:
         | > "I need people that serve me to be socioeconomically inferior
         | to me"
         | 
         | Do you actually think people think this way? I've never met
         | anyone who thinks like that.
        
           | JohnMakin wrote:
           | Go ahead, ask someone to explain why a guy at starbucks
           | "deserves" to be making less than a living wage, it boils
           | down to this. There's no real argument for it.
           | 
           | If you ask them why they shouldn't make more, they'll
           | typically say something like "it's not meant to be a career"
           | or some nonsense about inflation. Yet, society still needs
           | people to pour coffee or serve fast food, so by arguing
           | against a living wage in this manner you are actually arguing
           | that people with menial jobs should be poor by merit of the
           | type of work they do. Granted that isn't a perfect 1:1 with
           | what I said, but the attitude is definitely there. Why else
           | would someone be so vehemently against a person making a
           | living wage?
        
         | tomrod wrote:
         | I call BS on this, that society "by and large" must be served
         | by socioecnomic inferiors. We simply have too many societies
         | where socioeconomic class is a main divider that don't have a
         | tipping culture.
         | 
         | People not in the luxury class respond to prices, full stop.
         | This is a policy (tipping allowed to be performed) that has
         | gained pseudomoral status.
        
         | Yodel0914 wrote:
         | I don't think either of these positions is correct.
         | 
         | The reason fast food workers don't earn more money is because
         | there is a pool of workers who are willing to accept the
         | current wages, because they don't have a better alternative. It
         | has nothing to do with "deserve", in either direction.
        
         | s1artibartfast wrote:
         | I think this is an absurdly cynical take. I have never met
         | someone who thinks that.
         | 
         | I think most people actually believe in supply and demand, and
         | that it has nothing to do with effort.
         | 
         | Most people intuitively understand that if someone is not
         | easily replaceable, they have more leverage. If there is a line
         | of replacements out the door, they have little leverage.
        
       | SuperNinKenDo wrote:
       | It completely blows my mind that some magical expected tip amount
       | is baked in to make an already abysmal minimum wage even lower.
       | Pure skulduggery.
        
       | hahahacorn wrote:
       | Since it has recently come to become a major personality trait. I
       | can't help but notice the bullshit of 20-40 minute commutes in
       | traffic being "normal". Good public transportation, smart mixed
       | use development, and generally reducing car dependence could be a
       | very large factor in mitigating the pain of this employment.
       | 
       | I did appreciate the author mentioning how tired they are after
       | moving for 6.5 hours straight. I worked 3 years in the service
       | industry as a food runner, I still remember my busiest shift
       | being a 5 hour lunch on Memorial Day when we had 3/5 runners not
       | show up. Easily the most chaotic (and profitable) shift I've ever
       | worked. I did ~35k steps in the 6 hours I was working, while
       | carrying comically large food trays around half the time. But, I
       | almost made more money/hr than I currently do as a senior
       | software engineer in the Bay Area, lol.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-11-28 23:01 UTC)