[HN Gopher] Honeybee clustering when it's cold is a distress beh...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Honeybee clustering when it's cold is a distress behavior: study
        
       Author : sohkamyung
       Score  : 101 points
       Date   : 2023-11-25 00:20 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (theconversation.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (theconversation.com)
        
       | ChumpGPT wrote:
       | We would use thick Styrofoam insulation (2-3) inches thick and
       | would insulate the entire hive with it. In the winter we would
       | feed them occasionally with warm honey/sugar. The Hives were also
       | protected by a row of thick Evergreens as a wind break. Maybe
       | lost one or two hives over a decade. If your not wrapping them
       | and preparing them for winter than you shouldn't have bees.
        
         | sfink wrote:
         | The article directly agrees with you (though your thickness is
         | even better than they propose):
         | 
         | > This means that for hive walls to be effective, they have to
         | be substantially insulating, such as 30mm of polystyrene.
        
         | mrweasel wrote:
         | Modern Scandinavian beehives are normally made from Styropor,
         | and about 30 - 40mm thick. The bees will still cluster. I do
         | think you're on to something though, because losing only two
         | hives over a decade is pretty impressive, regardless of your
         | number of hives. A common issue is that the bee will cluster
         | and move "the wrong way" in the hive, away from available food,
         | and the get stuck in a corner and starve. It seems like the
         | level of isolation you provide might be enough that the bees
         | are more free to move around.
        
           | bjelkeman-again wrote:
           | One way to combat that, according to our old bee keeping
           | advisor, is to have at least two boxes and stack them so that
           | the frames are 90 degrees to each other (one box compared to
           | the next), with food in both boxes. This way the bees seem to
           | not get stuck in a corner as often.
        
             | mrweasel wrote:
             | I never heard that, but that sounds reasonable. In Denmark
             | it's generally considered less than ideal to have more than
             | one box during the winter, unless you use Seeberger or
             | other lower profile boxes.
        
               | bjelkeman-again wrote:
               | Our advisor always used two boxes, normal height, and it
               | seemed to work for him. We have been using two with
               | reasonable success for a few years. But the sample is
               | small.
        
         | voisin wrote:
         | > If your not wrapping them and preparing them for winter than
         | you shouldn't have bees.
         | 
         | There is an entire philosophy of beekeeping supported by a
         | variety of studies conducted on remote islands around the UK
         | that we should be positioning bees for minimal interference
         | like you suggest (as well as interference via mite treatments,
         | etc) in order to allow for evolutionary adaptations to create
         | more robust bee populations.
        
         | giantg2 wrote:
         | This depends heavily on the local climate. There are some
         | places where it is required and others where it is not.
        
         | steve_adams_86 wrote:
         | There seem to be a lot of hobbies or activities like beekeeping
         | where people seriously neglect the animals' needs yet seem
         | quite oblivious to it. I've noticed in aquaria that people
         | often seem to think fish or shrimp will be fine in absolutely
         | dire conditions such as low oxygen, chemically unstable, cold,
         | hot, or otherwise hostile environments. They're genuinely
         | confused when the system collapses. Certainly some species are
         | very resilient, but it's no surprise that people lose entire
         | hives or aquariums like this. Caring for nature requires real
         | care, attention, and diligence.
         | 
         | As in aquaria, if you want something you can "set and forget",
         | you need to let nature take over and provide a) a biome
         | resembling a natural habitat and b) place the appropriate
         | species and scape inside it. Then you can get away with no
         | mechanical filtration, no heater, no air, etc. You can safely
         | go on vacation because the system will clean itself, generate
         | food, and so on. But that requires considerable knowledge and
         | care at the outset and the willingness to let things be. In the
         | case of beekeeping, this almost seems like you'd need to allow
         | a hive to be inside of a log or stump or something where the
         | bees are properly protected and secure. Barring that, you need
         | to be cognizant of their needs and actually take care of them.
         | 
         | I'm not sure why people get the idea that animals should
         | survive in conditions so wildly different from their natural
         | conditions, and why they continue to try to make it work.
        
           | Night_Thastus wrote:
           | >There seem to be a lot of hobbies or activities like
           | beekeeping where people seriously neglect the animals' needs
           | yet seem quite oblivious to it.
           | 
           | Reptiles are notorious for this as well. I am an avid fan of
           | snakes, and it's depressing to see how often they are kept
           | very poorly. So little humidity that they have multiple
           | layers of stuck eyecaps - potentially losing their vision.
           | Serious infections from bites from live-feeding. Tiny cramped
           | enclosures with nowhere for the snake to hide. Poor heat
           | management that either leaves it freezing or with serious
           | burns. Overfeeding to the point of obesity. Buying wild-
           | caught animals. Buying snakes with severe genetic problems.
           | 
           | It's very frustrating. Some owners are responsive to advice
           | and will quickly do what they can to improve their care - but
           | some are stubborn and won't accept any at all.
        
           | zlg_codes wrote:
           | > I'm not sure why people get the idea that animals should
           | survive in conditions so wildly different from their natural
           | conditions, and why they continue to try to make it work.
           | 
           | You're aware of what animal we are, yes? Our natural habitat
           | is the _savanna_. We 're grassland, running monkeys. We've
           | spread across the entire globe and put our own kind into
           | situations we'd never ask an animal to excel.
           | 
           | It's practically in our own nature to try to defy nature
           | itself, in a stroke of irony.
           | 
           | You're correct, for the record. People get into things they
           | have no clue about and then animals suffer for it. But this
           | stood out to me because we even expect ourselves to make it
           | outside of good conditions.
        
         | cryptonector wrote:
         | Where? I don't insulate mine, but it's Central Texas, where...
         | it does admittedly get very cold from time to time, but not
         | usually for very long.
        
       | nuc1e0n wrote:
       | Honeybee Christmas of course
        
       | cbsmith wrote:
       | I wonder if this is in some way part of the cause of colony
       | collapse...
        
         | SquirrelOnFire wrote:
         | That seems unlikely, given that beekeepers have kept hives in
         | similar thin-walled boxes for centuries and colony collapse is
         | a recent phenomenon. Plus CC occurs in wild populations[1] as
         | well, suggesting either a widespread environmental factor or
         | communicable agent.
         | 
         | [1]https://www.nrdc.org/stories/colony-collapse-disorder-why-
         | ar...
        
           | cbsmith wrote:
           | I wasn't suggesting it was the _cause_ , so much as a
           | contributor. There's a general sense that the odds of CC
           | increase as the colony becomes more and more stressed.
        
       | alternative_a wrote:
       | I think it inaccurate to think of the hive as an extension of
       | phenotype of an individual bee. It's a bit recursive since it is
       | the collection of the individual bees -- the hive -- that builds
       | the physical aspects of the hive. What is interesting here is the
       | tantalizing notion of layers of awareness and individuality and
       | what (or more interestingly where) is the human super-organism
       | operating.
        
       | giantg2 wrote:
       | This is interesting, but what is the application? The debate
       | about insulating or not has been going on for a long time.
       | Anecdotal experience has been that losses have been similar for
       | people who insulate vs not insulating, and those losses vary from
       | year to year. Of course there are numerous other reasons for
       | colony loss, but if this was a significant factor, I would assume
       | we'd see a noticeable effect.
        
         | notanote wrote:
         | Agreed. Beekeepers have gathered a lot of experience. Is some
         | of it based on incorrect understanding of science? Sure. Would
         | they have noticed if insulation was a deciding factor in loss
         | of colonies? Absolutely.
         | 
         | I will say that this article together with one from earlier
         | this year [1] put into question the benefit of cold storage.
         | 
         | [1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-39095-5
        
         | Yhippa wrote:
         | My takeaway is that clustering is a distress signal and that
         | reducing distress would be the humane thing to do assuming that
         | insects feel pain.
        
           | kurthr wrote:
           | Humans prefer fake treatments that cause pain, because you
           | "know they're working".
           | 
           | This cold storage is a significant added cost and used only
           | in hot areas . It minimizes varroa since the mites can only
           | breed in hives with brood. It's done in spring when otherwise
           | the bees might swarm. Failing to insulate hives in cold areas
           | will require more feeding to maintain colony size over
           | winter, and that would be financially dumb.
           | 
           | https://www.projectapism.org/indoor-storage-of-honey-bees-
           | bl...
           | 
           | The writer seems like an expert, but makes weird assumptions.
           | Commercial beekeepers are very different (and care much more
           | about costs and output) than hobbyists. Some hobbyists are no
           | doubt incompetent (but caring), and some commercial
           | operations are completely uncaring (but rarely incompetent).
        
             | giantg2 wrote:
             | "Failing to insulate hives in cold areas will require more
             | feeding to maintain colony size over winter."
             | 
             | What I have heard is that they use less food when it it
             | cooler due to their metabolism being lower.
        
           | pvaldes wrote:
           | > assuming that insects feel pain
           | 
           | Sometimes it seems that this kind of philosophical narratives
           | are anchored in XVII century science. Everything with pain
           | receptors feels pain. Period. Animals evolved this structures
           | exclusively to feeling pain. Because this is a very positive
           | trait if you want to survive.
           | 
           | Insects and other invertebrates are known to have pain
           | receptors since the XX century (Yes, clams feel pain, and
           | roundworms feel pain also). This is not new ground breaking
           | science at all. What is new is using this to move forward the
           | agenda of the cruelty animal crew.
           | 
           | I'm not against building better beehives, but we should
           | focus, --laser focus--, our attention and most of all our
           | scarce resources investing into much more urgent problems
           | with insect losing of habitat, being poisoned and facing
           | extinction.
           | 
           | Because money is scarce on conservation and much more scarce
           | on invertebrate conservation; and "give me money or this bee
           | will die frozen two days before to just die of old age and be
           | replaced by other bee" is a ridiculous problem.
        
             | aftbit wrote:
             | Quick translation for those who are confused by the Roman
             | numerals like I originally was:
             | 
             | XVII century -> 17th century -> years 1600 to 1699
             | 
             | XX century -> 20th century -> years 1900 to 1999
        
             | giantg2 wrote:
             | "Everything with pain receptors feels pain."
             | 
             | Yet they'll never know real pain like the devs in deadend
             | or overworked jobs.
        
       | jadbox wrote:
       | The ending was a little odd to me. Why would someone believe that
       | hives aren't extended phenotype of the bee? As the article
       | examples: hives to bees are like beavers to dams.
        
         | cosmojg wrote:
         | Or buildings to humans!
        
         | dwallin wrote:
         | I felt the article pretty thoroughly explained why the author
         | feels that hives are not currently respected as an extended
         | phenotype. Many studies of bee behavior are run on bees in
         | artificial hives. They are treating artificial hives as
         | interchangeable with their natural equivalents and assuming
         | that the behavior observed reflects normal bee behavior. This
         | can lead to many erroneous conclusions, the same way you might
         | get misleading studies on beaver behavior if you studied a
         | bunch of beavers living in a rabbit hutch. To quote from the
         | article:
         | 
         | > Honeybee (Apis mellifera) colonies don't hibernate. In the
         | wild they overwinter in tree cavities that keep at least some
         | of their numbers above 18degC in a wide range of climates,
         | including -40degC winters. But popular understanding of their
         | overwintering behaviour is dominated by observation of their
         | behaviour in thin (19mm) wooden hives. These man-made hives
         | have very different thermal properties compared with their
         | natural habitat of thick-walled (150mm) tree hollows.
        
           | zlg_codes wrote:
           | This is an important detail! Imagine pulling up to a motel
           | and finding out the insulation sucks. You didn't plan for it
           | so you're cold.
        
       | pests wrote:
       | I read a great book Honeybee Democracy by Thomas Dyer Seeley
       | (2010)
       | 
       | Highly recommended for more information on bees and their hives.
        
       | fsckboy wrote:
       | so my analogy for this type of bias is, I only want to discuss
       | things like whether (we should have helped Ukraine resist Russia
       | /or/ if Israel's response to Hamas is appropriate) with people
       | who are completely honest about their motivations. If you are
       | "anti-war" (typical meaning in the Western context) just say that
       | you are anti-war. I can understand the position, I won't freak
       | out, and I will make sure your vote will be counted. But I don't
       | want to discuss it with you just to hear you invent a bunch of
       | customized reasons why in each circumstance there's no logic to
       | helping Ukraine or Israel, etc.
       | 
       | If you are ethically a vegetarian, just tell me that, don't tell
       | me how unhealthy meat is, it's a waste of time (=a portion of
       | both our precious lives), it's a lie, and it's bad science (as in
       | it's motivated to a goal, not that it's necessarily wrong; if it
       | turns out to be right, the boy-who-cried-wolf is not the right
       | messenger).
       | 
       | we used to think that bees cluster to keep warm, didn't we? this
       | person says clustering is a stress response... well, being cold
       | can be stressful, so can taking the GREs, that doesn't mean it's
       | not good for you. So then I read this shit:
       | 
       | > _Deliberately inducing clustering by practice or poor hive
       | design may be considered poor welfare or even cruelty, in light
       | of these findings. There are almost no ethics standards for
       | insects. But there is growing evidence that insects feel pain. A
       | 2022 study found that bumblebees react to potentially harmful
       | stimuli in a way that is similar to pain responses in humans. We
       | urgently need to change beekeeping practice to reduce the
       | frequency and duration of clustering_
       | 
       | Nothing wrong with thinking we need to stress over reducing bee
       | stress, but you're stressing me when I discover that I'm
       | listening to a person obsessed with a fairly narrow slice of what
       | it means to be a human, or what it means to be a bee.
        
         | rightbyte wrote:
         | That was a very indirect way to say you don't care for bees'
         | housing?
         | 
         | And I don't agree with your point either. Auxillary arguments
         | are good. If the bees' housing needs don't concern you. Maybe a
         | claim that they make better honey while not stressed would.
        
         | calf wrote:
         | How do you reasonably distinguish this between a serious
         | disagreement in a debate, versus an author with an axe to grind
         | (i.e., having hidden motivations)?
        
           | fsckboy wrote:
           | I was simply asking for people to politely do it themselves.
           | If you want to do serious research, you need to look for your
           | own biases, that's the honorable thing to do we would all
           | agree. I was just posting a reminder.
           | 
           | I don't dismiss the ideas of a pacifist or a vegan, I would
           | just prefer not to hear lots of repetition, especially when
           | it's disguised.
        
       | WaitWaitWha wrote:
       | A couple of notes on the article, that I disagree with, backing
       | it up by "appeal to authority" through my decades as a beek.
       | 
       | > These man-made hives have very different thermal properties
       | compared with their natural habitat of thick-walled (150mm) tree
       | hollows.
       | 
       | Bees, including _Apis mellifera_ will build hives anywhere where
       | there is sufficient cover, space, and ventilation, not just
       | "thick-walled (150mm) tree hollows".
       | 
       | > On cold days in these thin-walled hives, colonies form dense
       | disks of bees, called a cluster, between the honeycombs.
       | 
       | The presumption is that the human made hives are less thermally
       | protective because they are "thin-walled". This is just patently
       | incorrect. There are many, many hive designs and many are made
       | out of wood, but many are made out of plastics or even styrofoam.
       | Their thermal protection can be significantly higher than 150mm
       | wood (later noted in the article substantially insulating, such
       | as 30mm of polystyrene".)
       | 
       | Bees do not form a dense "disks of bees". They form a ball, and
       | rotate in and out with the queen around the center, just like the
       | referenced penguins.
       | 
       | I could not identify the type of hives that were evaluated. From
       | the picture, it appears to be a tiny apiary with Langstroth
       | design, all with three full/deep/brood boxes. From the pictures
       | in the paper, they evaluated eight hives.
       | 
       | I am willing to learn, but this single article provides
       | insufficient details how the data was collected and in what
       | context was done.
       | 
       | Most non-initiates think that beekeepers somehow control bee
       | colonies like cows or chicken. Not so much. If a colony decides
       | they want to leave, there is almost nothing you can do about it;
       | they will leave. If they figure they did not like the winter,
       | they will move. A hive will be just fine in a felled log, a
       | hollow tree, or human made space for years without any
       | interaction. It is more of a symbiotic relationship than a
       | stewardship.
       | 
       | edit: spellingerating fixage
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-11-27 23:00 UTC)