[HN Gopher] The Frog That Couldn't Jump
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Frog That Couldn't Jump
        
       Author : lermontov
       Score  : 38 points
       Date   : 2023-11-24 20:30 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.thedial.world)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.thedial.world)
        
       | thriftwy wrote:
       | https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hX2aZU2jhNE for the song referenced
       | in the article.
        
       | thriftwy wrote:
       | The obviously fun takeaway would be that if we put North Korea as
       | a 9 on the Dear Leader scale, and USSR under Stalin at 8, then
       | the USA will rate 4 its President cult, and that would be much
       | higher than the rest of Western world.
       | 
       | Is that a good thing? A bad one? Who knows.
        
         | msla wrote:
         | > then the USA will rate 4 its President cult
         | 
         | What? 4 or so would be the UK with their "Royal Family" (OMG!
         | FERGIE!) worship.
        
           | actionfromafar wrote:
           | UK is a weird outlier, because the royals aren't really
           | leaders. Their role is almost clerical, rather.
        
             | Gibbon1 wrote:
             | Had thought recently their role is to squat on space that a
             | would be fearless leader would try to exploit.
        
           | PaulDavisThe1st wrote:
           | The UK deal with the royals is really quite different. There
           | may be an over-fascination but there isn't a huge amount of
           | deference, and if the royals want to make things happen that
           | are not popular, they have to use very twisty back door
           | routes. The (public) relationship that even fervent royal
           | supporters have towards the royals is nothing like the
           | (public ) relationship with Stalin et al.
           | 
           | Also, it's pretty easy in the UK to say that the royal family
           | is stupid and they suck and they leech money from working
           | people and nothing will happen.
        
           | jdietrich wrote:
           | That's the essential genius of constitutional monarchy - by
           | investing the royal family with immense status but no actual
           | power, we reduce the status of those who wield real power to
           | mere public servants. The Prime Minister must ask the
           | monarch's permission to form a government, in the knowledge
           | that the monarch has no actual power to refuse. Those who
           | hold public office swear an oath of loyalty to the monarch,
           | in the knowledge that the monarch's power is wholly and
           | irrevocably delegated to parliament and the judiciary.
           | 
           | The monarch is in essence an empty vessel, symbolising
           | whatever version of Britishness we happen to believe in.
           | Regardless of the government of the day or the divisions that
           | may arise in society, the crown endures. The man or woman
           | responsible for running the country does so as a temporary
           | custodian.
           | 
           | Britain is dysfunctional in all sorts of ways, but the parts
           | that function best are extremely Lindy. The monarchy, like
           | our unelected upper house, is completely idiotic in theory
           | but incredibly successful in practice.
        
             | marcinzm wrote:
             | But is what you describe a good thing? People seek status.
             | By removing status from being Prime Minister you make being
             | Prime Minister merely another step on the path to status.
             | I'm not sure it's a good thing for someone to see being
             | Prime Minister as a means of leverage to something else
             | they want.
        
       | patel011393 wrote:
       | He couldn't get it up :)
        
       | robocat wrote:
       | Interesting reading about what confers status in NK. Instead of
       | money, organisational proximity to the king seems to matter. And
       | from article:                 Literary success means becoming a
       | "professional revolutionary" with lots of perks: a three-month
       | "creativity leave" every year, permission to travel freely around
       | the country, and special housing privileges.
       | 
       | Clearly chasing status is what _matters_ , except in my world I'm
       | used to the middle class game of chasing status by chasing money.
        
         | PaulDavisThe1st wrote:
         | https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/13/opinion/ezra-klein-podcas...
         | 
         | "We build civilizations on status. But we barely understand it.
         | The sociologist Cecilia Ridgeway explains how status shapes our
         | world and our lives."
         | 
         | Transcript: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/13/opinion/ezra-
         | klein-podcas...
         | 
         | There's a nice moment in this where Klein talks about realizing
         | that his own attempts to eschew status were just another form
         | of status seeking.
        
       | 11thEarlOfMar wrote:
       | "A frog with no legs is deaf."
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-11-25 23:01 UTC)