[HN Gopher] The secret language of ships
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The secret language of ships
        
       Author : bookofjoe
       Score  : 170 points
       Date   : 2023-11-22 12:58 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (hakaimagazine.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (hakaimagazine.com)
        
       | Obscurity4340 wrote:
       | I want to see a treatment of The Secret Lives of Huge Ships,
       | 
       | Edit: and maybe assorted biopics on their Kap'ns. It would
       | amazing to have a workplace comedy of Huge Ships equivalent to
       | The Office, the Taliban too
        
       | pivo wrote:
       | For years my wife and I would run around the piers near us.
       | Occasionally we'd speculate about what these ship marks meant and
       | I'd promise myself I'd look them up when I get home, but I never
       | actually did. Very happy to have all those questions answered so
       | clearly!
        
       | rob74 wrote:
       | > _See the crew members up on deck, at the far left and right of
       | the photo? They're actually dummies dressed as mariners, meant to
       | fool pirates into thinking someone is always on watch._
       | 
       | The dummy crew complements the skeleton crew...
        
         | TeMPOraL wrote:
         | LOL, like an anti-pirate version of a scarecrow. Or that pigeon
         | on the rooftop of a building in my area, that I'm 99% sure is a
         | hidden camera or something, because it's _always there_ and I
         | 've never seen it move (and it isn't the anti-pigeon dummy,
         | because those mimic predators).
        
         | bmelton wrote:
         | I watched a documentary (I think it was "Stolen Seas") about a
         | cargo ship that had been captured by pirates, held captive for
         | (iirc?) months. After they were eventually released, the
         | documentary captured their passage through the same Somali sea
         | where they were captured last time.
         | 
         | They turned all their steam exhausts to point out and blast
         | everything on the upper deck. Took giant ropes, wrapped them in
         | barbed wire, and tossed them ashore to bounce around in the
         | seas to discourage any small vessels from coming near. I'm
         | remembering this because I think they had zero people on deck
         | (opposite of the mannequin strategy) -- as due to the steam, it
         | would have been wildly unsafe to be there.
         | 
         | In short, their preparations were _considerably_ more thorough,
         | but I can 't help but wonder if they'd have considered
         | mannequins if they'd thought of it.
        
           | ok_dad wrote:
           | They could just secure all the hatches and redesign any above
           | deck elements to be locked down as well, kinda like how a
           | secure door fixed aircraft hijacking's. Just keep the crew
           | inside behind locked steel doors! You don't really need
           | windows, a few cameras would be fine to drive with. Pirates
           | can come onboard but couldn't do anything from the deck in
           | this case.
        
       | NoboruWataya wrote:
       | Very good article, no BS just clear and comprehensive
       | explanations of the various features and symbols.
        
         | alfredpawney wrote:
         | I also liked this article which goes deeper no pun intended
         | into the invention of the Plimsoll Lines
         | https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/story-samuel-plimsoll-develop...
        
       | arethuza wrote:
       | Where we live we have great view over the Firth of Forth - which
       | is a reasonably busy waterway.
       | 
       | The find the full LPG tankers making their way out to the open
       | sea fascinating as they always have a gaggle of protective tugs
       | around them - including one going backwards behind the tanker
       | with a cable to the stern of tanker - presumably to stop it in a
       | hurry!
       | 
       | NB Yes I do wonder about the BLEVE risk - but the centre of the
       | shipping channel is at least 2km away which you'd hope would be
       | OK... ;-)
        
       | CalChris wrote:
       | The article mentions the _Bulbous Bow_ but it doesn 't really
       | explain it.
       | 
       | A ship going through water has hull drag which shows up as a bow
       | wave. This drag is a (decreasing!) function of hull length
       | (sqrt(LWL)). Longer boats have less drag. What the bulbous bow
       | does is it creates a counter bow wave which further reduces this
       | drag. However this magic only works at a specific speed tuned for
       | this hull.
       | 
       | On the San Francisco Bay, for example, a container ship will
       | leave the container port (Port of Oakland) at a slow restricted
       | speed (5 knots) inside the Bay. But once she exits the Bay and
       | the shipping channel and hits the open ocean, she will increase
       | her speed to maybe 25 knots to hit that tuned speed with less
       | hull drag and efficiently cruise across the Pacific.
       | 
       | However, the shipping industry noticed that no one wanted to pay
       | for that speed. Enter _Slow Steaming_. Boats could be retuned for
       | a slower but more fuel efficient speed, maybe 20 knots. The
       | industry literally took existing ships into dry dock and re-nosed
       | them. This meant transits took longer but also used less bunker
       | fuel, the cheapest and worst fuel which is only allowed to be
       | used offshore. This both saved money and reduced pollution.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulbous_bow
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slow_steaming
        
         | pests wrote:
         | It's not an article about ships and their parts. Its an article
         | about how ships communicate things to each other - thus the
         | focus on markings, writings, etc.
        
           | chrisatthestudy wrote:
           | Nevertheless it's an interesting addition, and I appreciate
           | it.
        
             | pests wrote:
             | Yes me too, I was cranky this morning. Nice addition.
        
           | gumby wrote:
           | FWIW I didn't interpret that first sentence of the comment as
           | criticism of the article.
        
             | pests wrote:
             | Oops, I may have too strongly. I agree it's still
             | interesting.
        
       | teddyh wrote:
       | Now do USB cables.
        
         | bookofjoe wrote:
         | https://www.conwire.com/blog/ultimate-guide-usb-cables/
        
           | teddyh wrote:
           | Does not cover USB 4, nor does it show any of the symbols or
           | their meanings.
        
             | bookofjoe wrote:
             | I apologize for failing to provide the information you
             | want. I will try to do better in the future.
        
               | bookofjoe wrote:
               | Second attempt: https://visiontek.com/blogs/blog/a-quick-
               | guide-to-usb-port-s...
        
               | teddyh wrote:
               | Very nice! That's more like what I was after. I also
               | found these, which seem official:
               | 
               | <https://www.usb.org/sites/default/files/USB-
               | IF%20Integrators...>
               | 
               | <https://www.enablingusb.org/certification>
        
       | throwawayForMe2 wrote:
       | They should add a section on the language of a ship's lights at
       | night.
        
       | newsclues wrote:
       | Technical language isn't really secret and is a great way (social
       | engineers) people can fool others that they belong, simply by
       | talking the right way.
        
         | scubbo wrote:
         | A less cynical way of putting this would be - it's delightful
         | that even non-experts can enjoy learning about technical jargon
         | and the underlying processes they reflect!
        
       | Duanemclemore wrote:
       | Thanks OP - I love whenever this article comes back across the
       | waves and give it a read when it does. While not directly
       | related, if you want another lyrical look in to the world of
       | containerized shipping, check out Sekula and Burch's The
       | Forgotten Space. Well worth the watch.
       | https://theforgottenspace.net/ Looking just now, apparently a lot
       | of reviewers had a problem with how polemical it is. I didn't.
       | But even if you disagree with the top line message, it's still a
       | fantastic look in to a world (or worlds) 99% of humans will never
       | get to see into.
        
       | hasoleju wrote:
       | I like the simplicity of the symbols. They really are
       | international and it's interesting to see how they all have a
       | clear purpose.
       | 
       | 1. White rectangle above red rectangle with yellow borders:
       | Pilot, please board here to guide us into the harbor.
       | 
       | 2. Horizontal line through a circle: You should see this line
       | above the water, otherwise the ship is overloaded.
       | 
       | 3. Sketch of a bulk under water: Be careful, this ship has a
       | bulbous bow that might be beneath the water surface.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-11-23 23:00 UTC)