[HN Gopher] More people should write (2012)
___________________________________________________________________
More people should write (2012)
Author : jsomers
Score : 126 points
Date : 2023-11-16 01:30 UTC (2 days ago)
(HTM) web link (jsomers.net)
(TXT) w3m dump (jsomers.net)
| adamquek wrote:
| Insightful. Too bad the author apparently stopped writing for 10
| years now.
| tea-coffee wrote:
| The author just recently published a nice piece in the New
| Yorker [1].
|
| 1 = https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/11/20/a-coder-
| consid...
| ketanhwr wrote:
| He still writes[0], albeit not on his blog, but for New Yorker,
| The Atlantic and the likes.
|
| [0] https://jsomers.net/#writing
| hasoleju wrote:
| As someone who just started writing regularly a few weeks ago
| this piece is very encouraging!
|
| I'm very curious if I will be able to make writing a habit. In
| the past I often quit new behaviors after a few months.
|
| I discovered this quitting behavior a year ago and since I'm
| aware of it I found a lot of examples where this happened in my
| past. Now I see everything I start as part of a big experiment to
| test which things stick. So that I can learn which properties of
| a habit make it stick with me.
| hypertexthero wrote:
| I'm the same way, I think.
|
| It's like the movie Groundhog Day.
|
| Every moment is a new start, and you keep starting over and
| over again and trying to finish or to improve your navigation
| of a messy, random river that is life.
|
| A piece of writing, a project, a trip to see friends is usually
| interrupted by life. And there's never that perfect time for
| you to do the work. Perfection is a memory of the past.
|
| We need to do things in between, simultaneously with all the
| mess, and keep starting over and over.
| vonjuice wrote:
| Hello, I'm someone who's been through that and I'm "on the
| other side" in the sense that I did stick to it. I wrote this
| and I hope you find it helpful:
| https://medium.com/@vonjuice/4-important-words-for-writing-c...
|
| > Now I see everything I start as part of a big experiment to
| test which things stick. So that I can learn which properties
| of a habit make it stick with me.
|
| This is wise. In addition to watching the properties of the
| object, which could be considered static, be mindful of the
| properties in yourself and how these interact with the former,
| because yours are dynamic and can be developed as a skill, so
| you learn how to make beneficial habits stick more regardless
| of their perceived properties.
| narinxas wrote:
| the more people out there that write, the less writtings by
| people are worth
|
| scarcity never creates value, but it always incresases it
|
| but also: the more pople have written, the cheaper text and AI
| bot training become
|
| which makes me feel in a funny situation, the more I write, the
| better I get at it, but it also makes it simpler for AIs bots to
| learn my style and make it worthless by the inverse-scarcity
| phenomenon
| kingkongjaffa wrote:
| Writing has a double value though, it's intrinsically valuable
| to the writer themselves to illicit better thinking. it's also
| valuable as form of communication and collaboration.
| clircle wrote:
| Are you trying to convince people to spend less time writing?
| Ive never disagreed with a comment more than this one
| narinxas wrote:
| I'm asking a question without an answer
| camel-cdr wrote:
| Why should one care about "worth"? If more people write then
| there will be more bad and more good writing. (good/bad in
| terms of personal enjoyment from reading)
| reg_dunlop wrote:
| Taking your argument, perhaps the thing that is being made
| scarce, through the act of writing, is ignorance
|
| Which might have served us better before now
| tene80i wrote:
| This only follows if the only value/worth you consider is
| economic value, ie for trade. Which would exclude much of what
| people value: creativity, scientific knowledge, insights for
| living, personal growth etc. Obviously those have economic
| value in certain ways, but it's not their only value.
| tuatoru wrote:
| Yes, getting better at communicating clearly and effectively
| is worth the time for social reasons. Aesthetic reasons can
| be important too.
| jodrellblank wrote:
| How would one know they are getting better at communicating
| clearly and effectively? Compare with code or drawing where
| mistakes are instantly seen. Writing doesn't have that, and
| if you read back your own writing you always know what you
| were thinking. Who has got time to read what you write,
| from an outside perspective, and reply with what they think
| you said, without getting involved in whether they
| dis/agree or dis/like?
|
| Maybe there's a website in that - parrot.me where you post
| and other people reply only with paraphrasing what you said
| back to you.
| narinxas wrote:
| i'm just exactly at that "moment in life" where it's either
| 'make' money (i.e. collect it from others using trade) or
| recieve welfare (ask for donations, beg on the streets, call
| parents...)
| vonjuice wrote:
| I think cooking is a good analogy. You may have no desire
| to get into the food industry, but having cooking skills is
| good for you (and potentially those around you) regardless.
| ducharmdev wrote:
| This is a coldly economic take. Does the sole motivation of
| writing have to be for the consumption of others?
| hawski wrote:
| Scarcity depends on the amount of openly published writing. You
| can publish only parts of your work or publish it to limited
| audience.
| causality0 wrote:
| If someone asks me if they should do something I do, I always
| lay out the pros and cons of doing what I do, and try to give
| them the questions whose answers they need to know in order to
| decide if they are the type of person who should. Why are there
| so many articles by writers telling other people they should be
| writing instead of telling them why they might or might not? I
| would never presume that any of my hobbies or habits is so
| universally beneficial.
| afrieirham wrote:
| > Why are there so many articles by writers telling other
| people they should be writing instead of telling them why
| they might or might not?
|
| I guess it's a "better" title in a sense that it gets people
| to read (ie clickbaity)
|
| A "pros and cons" article vs "here's why you should do X"
| elicit different emotions, which I'd argue, the latter is
| better for attention grab.
|
| But I do agree with you though, when someone asks me for
| advices, I always try to give them context.
|
| I also try to understand where the "advisor" comes from when
| I see radical advices out there. Even if I don't agree with
| it, at least I can understand the reason behind it.
| tehjoker wrote:
| the more people that exercise, the less exercise is valuable
| kingkongjaffa wrote:
| I love reading and writing. Do you all have any advice for
| writing more and writing better?
| tene80i wrote:
| Depends what kind of writing you want to be better at, but for
| fiction Stephen King's 'On Writing' is both interesting and
| useful. As for 'more', what's worked for me is to make a
| routine for it.
| tuatoru wrote:
| It's probably like photography: just do it a lot. Write about
| your home, your neighborhood. Edit: also read other writers'
| work, of course.
|
| In novel writing there's very old advice: plan to throw away
| your first million words. Actually, that's good advice
| generally, not just for fiction.
| smokel wrote:
| It depends :)
|
| Do you have an idea what stands in the way of your ambitions?
|
| Here are some suggestions (dang, I'm starting to sound like
| ChatGPT here):
|
| 1. Try an accountability partner and call them once a week to
| discuss progress.
|
| 2. Share your work, preferably to an audience you trust, and
| nourish feedback.
|
| 3. Experiment and train creativity. Write a short story, write
| with a pen, write technical documentation, write code.
|
| Hope this helps.
| surprisetalk wrote:
| Some great advice from Ben Kuhn on how & why of writing:
|
| [1] https://www.benkuhn.net/writing
|
| I also just published some structural tips for writing quickly
| at high quality:
|
| [2] https://taylor.town/pseudoprose
|
| Make sure to create a low-friction writing environment for
| yourself! Whether it's a notebook or text-editor, you should be
| able to get your idea onto paper within 90 seconds of having
| it.
| inglor_cz wrote:
| At the risk of sounding smugly, just write. Perhaps ask someone
| to read your texts, but don't rely too much on random critics.
| Individual people have their own taste and pet peeves; what is
| unreadable for one may be enjoyable for others.
|
| Writing is like hiking or skiing. While there are some
| important rules how not to kill yourself, you can only learn it
| by doing.
|
| Also, read a lot, ESPECIALLY works by people who have a good
| command of your language (IDK if you are native English
| speaker; I am not). Writing style is a bit contagious. Don't
| worry if you occassionally sound like someone else, this kind
| of contagion is really unavoidable if you read a lot.
|
| I would say that the optimal ratio of R:W time is about 5-6:1.
| GeoAtreides wrote:
| Read and think about you read.
|
| You can't get better at writing without reading as much as you
| can, as widely as you can.
| jodrellblank wrote:
| Possibly the thing I do most is read comments on the
| internet, I'm not convinced it makes me a better writer, tbh.
| GeoAtreides wrote:
| I'm sorry, I thought it was obvious I meant read books,
| good books.
| OliveMate wrote:
| Earlier this week I picked up a copy of On Writing Well by
| William Zinsser, a style guide on what he believes makes for
| good informal writing. It's yet to reflect in any of my
| comments but I'd recommend it if you struggle with being
| concise.
|
| It does have a heavy focus on American writing and it's akin to
| a longform opinion piece, but I wouldn't let that get in the
| way of what makes for an accessible and pleasant read.
|
| edit: What also helps is to sit down and write. Make a blog and
| even if you don't have a specific topic to focus on, just write
| and keep at it. Take a note of how you write, the style that
| you naturally develop with all of your quirks; do you overuse
| commas, do you routinely break up sentences with a dash or a
| semicolon? Does it have a sense of flow?
|
| Before long something will click in your head, you'll become
| more cognisant of the world around you, and your head will be
| screaming at you to write certain thoughts and ideas down.
| jyunwai wrote:
| I second the recommendation for "On Writing Well." I read
| this many years ago, and the book had a strong positive
| influence on my writing (serving me very well when later
| doing editorial work, writing articles, and writing
| summaries, emails, and reports week-to-week).
|
| George Orwell's "Politics and the English Language" essay is
| a short essay that shares many of the pieces of advice [1].
| The main principle that I've taken from both is that you will
| be more effective at getting your points across to the
| reader, if you optimize your writing for ease of
| comprehension, instead of attempting to sound sophisticated
| with unnecessarily fancy words. This is especially helpful in
| work environments, where getting your points across clearly
| can save yourself from delays due to confusion.
|
| I would also strongly recommend reading good writing often.
| Becoming a regular reader of a well-written newspaper or
| magazine is great for learning new ways to write down
| observations or advance a point of argumentation, and I've
| also personally found it enjoyable to have a broader
| awareness of what's going on in the world.
|
| [1] https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-
| foundation/orwel...
| ggpsv wrote:
| Any magazines that you recommend?
| randcraw wrote:
| I've found Harper's and The New Yorker educational for
| good composition and writing style.
| jyunwai wrote:
| I share randcraw's recommendation of Harper's and The New
| Yorker, as I've subscribed to both and found their
| writing quality to be excellent. If you'd like to try
| them out, I recommend reading some of the past "Easy
| Chair" columns in Harper's for short-to-medium-length
| reflective essay articles. In The New Yorker, "A Reporter
| At Large" features are excellent (as they are thorough
| and often impactful to shaping current events upon
| publication), though the writing style is relatively
| lengthy.
|
| If you like science reporting, The Atlantic has excellent
| reporters with this focus. The Scientific American and
| The New Scientist are also worth considering (along with
| the news and analysis-focused articles in the journals
| Nature and Science), though I've personally read The
| Atlantic more often as I'm also interested in the
| publication's articles about general topics outside of
| science reporting.
|
| If you're interested in geopolitics, I highly recommend
| Foreign Affairs. The authors and contributors typically
| have interesting backgrounds in government or academia,
| and the essays are in-depth. Similarly to The New Yorker,
| the release of certain articles is itself newsworthy
| (often as senior policymakers of various countries are
| often guest writers)--as a direct result, the publication
| is closely read by senior policymakers of different
| countries. I also recommend The Diplomat as a comparable
| publication, with a specialized focus on news and
| analysis about geopolitics in East Asia.
|
| If literary writing interests you, I would also recommend
| looking into some literary journals, such as The Paris
| Review, The Baffler, The Hedgehog Review, The Malahat
| Review, and Ploughshares.
|
| These days, I personally listen to the audio versions of
| The New Yorker's Reporter At Large segments and The
| Atlantic's science reporting when I can. For the
| remaining publications, I typically download the ePub or
| PDF versions for reading on an e-reader (minus the
| publications that don't offer their issues in their
| format), and read just the articles that I find
| interesting on my commute.
|
| For you personally, I would recommend identifying topics
| of interests that you are passionate about. You can then
| try to find high-quality publications about these
| subjects, which may or may not be on this list. If you're
| more interested in the focuses of the publications you
| read, you are more likely to develop a habit of reading
| well-written articles, which is helpful for improving
| your own ability to write.
| vonjuice wrote:
| Allocate a time of the day, every day, for writing. You can
| spend the time writing whatever comes to mind, working on a
| story, or staring out the window, or reading _about_ writing.
| For the latter, I recommend this list:
|
| https://www.themarginalian.org/2013/05/03/advice-on-writing/
| PikelEmi wrote:
| I do a daily writing exercise that is to write at least 1000
| words, whatever comes to mind. No editing. Just let it flow and
| see where it takes you. When you get used to it (which you will
| do very quick) you will be surprised how it improves your
| writing skills.
| anon012012 wrote:
| I actually composed a free ebook about writing advice from many
| major writers.
|
| https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSMJ_VIYylRcKIpb...
|
| Hopefully this should help.
| Apocryphon wrote:
| Is to post different from writing? Considering that so much of
| online user-generated content these days are posts, comments,
| replies. I'm not even talking about fluffy exhibitionist social
| media posts or incoherent comments on news articles. I mean
| supposedly more highbrow comments on special interest aggregator
| sites such as this. Forums and bulletin boards.
|
| Does that constitute writing? Or are we just creating more
| ephemeral chaff?
| pilgrim0 wrote:
| I think posting is, in general, an extension of dialogues, i.e
| conversation. Writing involves dialogues, of course, but
| encompasses a much wider field of styles. Ephemerality of the
| text does not automatically implies reduced value. You'll get
| some of the benefits of writing within dialogues but it's
| limited by the fact there's not much room from digression, so
| less creative freedom and exploratory potential compared to
| just actively choosing the subject and style, with no
| particular audience or pre established context in mind. I
| regard monologues as an expansion of dialogues (a dialogue
| participation is sort of a monologue if you think about), and
| there's a low entry barrier for doing it, can be very enriching
| and even therapeutical. All in all, I think the author here is
| talking writing for the sake of writing, which is structured
| thinking.
| 082349872349872 wrote:
| Posts can go either way: I would say that some online exchanges
| have more of an oral cultural character and others have more of
| a literary cultural character.
|
| (upon reading TFA, it seems it doesn't even care about the
| oral/literary distinction I had been trying to make; for TFA
| the important part of posting is the export of thoughts out of
| one's head, which can be done in either mode?)
| broscillator wrote:
| As someone who has been doing both daily for a while, yes,
| they're different.
|
| It's kind of like comparing speaking at a meeting or giving a
| speech, to talking to a long time friend over coffee, or
| talking to yourself in the mirror. In the abstract you could
| say the action is the same, speaking, but the experience as
| lived is very different.
| photochemsyn wrote:
| related & useful:
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20061078
|
| Undervalued Engineering Skills: Writing Well
| (pragmaticengineer.com)
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37033403
|
| Some tactics for writing in public (jvns.ca)
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37118883
|
| Writing about what you learn pushes you to understand topics
| better (addyosmani.com)
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19143853
|
| Vim Is Saving Me Hours of Work When Writing Books and Courses
| (nickjanetakis.com)
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22854332
|
| Writing a Book with Pandoc, Make, and Vim (keleshev.com)
|
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24628549
|
| Writing a book: is it worth it? (kleppmann.com)
| jheriko wrote:
| A good, solid and old argument...
|
| https://www.ucl.ac.uk/museums-static/digitalegypt/literature...
| inglor_cz wrote:
| I love writing. I have more than 1000 articles under my belt and
| eight books, all in the last 7 years.
|
| Writing helps you discipline your thoughts. All too often,
| logical gaps or nuggets of ignorance in a seemingly watertight
| argument only turn up when you commit your thoughts to the paper.
| (Well, word processor.) And, vice versa, thinking without writing
| things down tends to be infected with sloppiness.
|
| Write things, if only for yourself and your future self. You may
| also find out that you have a knack for it. In that case,
| godspeed.
| BizarreByte wrote:
| I don't write because writing is tied to some very bad memories.
| I'm terrified of people reading what I write and humiliating me,
| it wouldn't be the first time.
|
| Me innermost thoughts remain mine alone as a result.
| broscillator wrote:
| I find burning pages kinda therapeutic. Give it a try, write
| your least shareable thoughts and then watch them burn.
| jerrre wrote:
| How do you you do this in practice?
| SlickNixon wrote:
| Well-ventilated area, non-flammable container,
| lighter/matches. Liquor, cigarette, thousand-yard stare
| optional.
| jodrellblank wrote:
| You just gave me a sad idea where there are people who
| exist to adulthood who have never burned paper or seen it
| burn first-hand. Like city children who have never seen
| animals, or lakes or seas or oceans, or never seen the
| stars, deprived of some deeply human experiences. (I grew
| up with a log fireplace at home, but I also played with
| friends using a magnifying glass to concentrate sunlight
| and ignite paper out on the street).
|
| Do you mean "how does one burn a piece of paper" literally?
| Or, how does that person arrange their life to have a fire
| regularly?
| mdorazio wrote:
| My gut reaction was the same, but then I realized that in
| order to burn anything more substantial than a match on a
| regular basis I'd have to go to the outdoor grills or
| something. There's no way to do it in my apartment
| without setting off a fire alarm.
| medstrom wrote:
| Will candles set off the fire alarm where you live too?
|
| I'll wager that burning one sheet of paper at a time
| would be on par with a continuously burning candle.
| 2-718-281-828 wrote:
| of course, s/he means how to burn a piece of paper
| without setting the apartment on fire or set off an
| alarm. it's really funny that your first thought was that
| they doesn't know how to burn something technically and
| connect that to children who think a chicken has four
| legs or cacao milk is produced by brown cows. had me
| chuckle.
| Tomte wrote:
| > You just gave me a sad idea where there are people who
| exist to adulthood who have never burned paper or seen it
| burn first-hand.
|
| Done that, never again. I thought it would be cool to
| burn my paper print of some key material. Opened the
| door, put a lighter to the paper on the landing just a
| step from the door.
|
| The paper did not burn cleanly as I imagined, and I had
| soon rather large pieces of burned paper flying inside my
| apartment. Not burning, luckily, but brittle and becoming
| ash wherever I tried to catch them or pick them up.
|
| Learned my lesson: Put paper into a fireproof container,
| then burn it.
| imhoguy wrote:
| Just write on a sheet of paper, then fold it, put on a
| ceramic dish plate and burn it with lighter. Make sure you
| keep a window open and far from anything flammable. Better
| if you have a fireplace.
| Obscurity4340 wrote:
| Bro(scillator), u fine. Just respond to that which is evocative
| to you and you won't be able to stop the words pouring out of
| you like... Ya you get the analogy ;)
| runjake wrote:
| I feel you, but you should get over that. You're only hurting
| yourself.
|
| Counseling with a qualified professional is immensely helpful.
| With a decent counselor, you could start seeing results almost
| immediately.
|
| I am rooting for you.
| Obscurity4340 wrote:
| Dialectical formats and "responding" to shit is seemingly the
| most I can generally handle. If I was "comfier" I would probably
| put my heart into it a bit more but I think I do ok on the
| creating/consuming balance
| mrcsd wrote:
| I've recently started writing daily, since September. Setting a
| daily word target was what worked for me, I do at least 1600 a
| day and try not to write too much more. If you're writing a first
| draft of around 90k words then it will take _only_ 56 days to get
| there at 1.6k a day. My realisation that this was actually a
| pretty small time commitment really helped me finally take the
| plunge.
|
| This is obviously an old idea, and indeed I'm just copying a
| similar process to Haruki Murakami's. I definitely recommend his
| series of essays on being a novelist: Novelist as a Vocation
| (this really helped me).
|
| On to second draft now and moving from daily word count to number
| of chapters or paragraphs edited has helped as just a metric for
| pace. Doesn't mean it's quality writing, just that I have a
| sensation of movement and progress.
| jyunwai wrote:
| Related to writing, I also high recommend Murakami's "What I
| Talk About When I Talk About Running." He wrote this as a
| memoir centred along running, and he often writes about how his
| habits of running carries over to other habits in his life,
| such as writing. I liked this excerpt from the memoir in
| particular:
|
| "Right now I'm aiming at increasing the distance I run, so
| speed is less of an issue. As long as I can run a certain
| distance, that's all I care about. Sometimes I run fast when I
| feel like it, but if I increase the pace I shorten the amount
| of time I run, the point being to let the exhilaration I feel
| at the end of each run carry over to the next day. This is the
| same sort of tack I find necessary when writing a novel. I stop
| every day right at the point where I feel I can write more. Do
| that, and the next day's work goes surprisingly smoothly. I
| think Ernest Hemingway did something like that. To keep on
| going, you have to keep up the rhythm. This is the important
| thing for long-term projects. Once you set the pace, the rest
| will follow. The problem is getting the flywheel to spin at a
| set speed--and to get to that point takes as much concentration
| and effort as you can manage."
| ravenstine wrote:
| The reason I don't write is that I'm unconvinced that a
| worthwhile number of people will find my writings and actually
| read them in 2023.
|
| I'm fine with doing all my writing on HN. If you look at the
| comments section of my profile, it might as well be a microblog.
| MezzoDelCammin wrote:
| I just did look. 19k karma is indeed nothing to sneeze at.
|
| Difference is though that in the HN comments it's someone else
| who picks the topic and time.
|
| Much as I appreciate the discussion here, occasionally I think
| there's some value in just doing a writeup on a topic. Or, a
| memory dump. If for no other reason, than for the therapeutic
| value of cleaning up the mind... And forcing the random musings
| that make sense in the head through the filter of written
| language just to see what actually makes sense.
| jodrellblank wrote:
| The argument in the article does not involve anyone reading
| your writing: " _That's the promise: you will live more
| curiously if you write. You will become a scientist, if not of
| the natural world than of whatever world you care about. More
| of that world will pop alive. You will see more when you look
| at it._ "
| jyunwai wrote:
| I wonder if there is a way to easily export one's own Hacker
| News comments. It might be useful for you to back your comments
| up one day, as there can be value in searching through your
| past writing and also having a backup (which never hurts).
| krapp wrote:
| Write a script to download them using the Hacker News API.[0]
|
| First, get the user endpoint: https://hacker-
| news.firebaseio.com/v0/user/<username>.json (ex:
| https://hacker-
| news.firebaseio.com/v0/user/jl.json?print=pre...)
|
| then iterate the "submitted" array and make a request to each
| ID at the item endpoint: https://hacker-
| news.firebaseio.com/v0/item/<ID>.json (ex: https://hacker-
| news.firebaseio.com/v0/item/8863.json?print=p...)
|
| Then save each JSON response somewhere. You won't be able to
| get the content of flagged and banned messages. If you do
| this more than once you'll also need to keep track of the
| last ID you downloaded, or the updates endpoint to catch
| edits, I think, although the readme is a bit vague about how
| exactly that works.
|
| [0]https://github.com/HackerNews/API
| Tomte wrote:
| https://github.com/dogsheep/hacker-news-to-sqlite
| jodrellblank wrote:
| > " _It's like what happens to a room during a game of "I Spy":
| if your friend spies something red, the red stuff glows._ "
|
| The only I Spy I know is "I spy with my little eye something
| beginning with...". Is there another common version where people
| describe the appearance of the thing instead of the spelling of
| the name?
| privong wrote:
| Growing up, my brothers and I would play "I spy" by identifying
| a color. E.g., "I spy with my little eye something that is
| orange".
| burritofanatic wrote:
| Your writing has stayed with me, and I occasionally remember bits
| of your essays many years later. Pleased to see your articles in
| recent months in the New Yorker. Congrats on being a dad!
| Animats wrote:
| > write full sentences about themselves and the things they care
| about.
|
| This is from 2012, when social media had not yet taken over the
| world. Now we're drowning in a sea of verbiage from people
| writing about themselves.
| dan-robertson wrote:
| I think my memory of 2012 must be different from yours, though
| I'm not exactly sure what 'taken over the world' means.
| yawnxyz wrote:
| What about people who write for themselves, and somehow end up on
| the homepage of Hacker News? You'll end up getting roasted by
| people like this guy: > Disagree. Writing a blog post is like
| getting on stage. You need to come on stage with a dream that
| you're going to dazzle the audience with your show. Your blog is
| so interesting that it's worth the time to read it!
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38324486
| imhoguy wrote:
| I don't write because: 1) I don't find writing in my native
| language interesting, 2) I am not fluent enough to write in
| English, 3) I think I would feel quite embarrassed to share my
| views under my name.
|
| But I am contemplating about writing under pseudonyms with GPT
| proofreader assistant. Actually I do it right now with HN but
| without AI part.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-11-18 23:01 UTC)