[HN Gopher] Australia's overuse of antibiotics driving rate of d...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Australia's overuse of antibiotics driving rate of drug-resistant
       infections
        
       Author : adrian_mrd
       Score  : 101 points
       Date   : 2023-11-15 19:21 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.theguardian.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.theguardian.com)
        
       | nostromo wrote:
       | 73% of antibiotics globally are used for livestock production,
       | not for human use, and yet we tend to only hear about how humans
       | need to cut back. How about we require ranchers to decrease their
       | animal density so they don't need to use so many antibiotics?
       | 
       | https://www.nrdc.org/resources/us-livestock-industries-persi...
        
         | bequanna wrote:
         | I agree with you on high density confinement livestock
         | production. But is there evidence of antibiotic resistant
         | strains in animals causing issues for humans?
        
           | rtkwe wrote:
           | There are a number of bacteria that have made the jump from
           | animals to people so creating a huge breeding pool for very
           | antibiotic resistant bacteria that have generated human
           | viruses in the past seems like a poor choice.
        
             | kungfufrog wrote:
             | Do you mean bacteria? Viruses are not treated by
             | antibiotics.
        
           | rando_dfad wrote:
           | Yes, a quick google turned up these:
           | 
           | Antibiotic Resistance from the Farm to the Table. September
           | 11, 2014. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/from-
           | farm-to-table.html. Accessed September 14, 2015.
           | 
           | https://www.who.int/news/item/07-11-2017-stop-using-
           | antibiot...
           | 
           | ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE--LINKING HUMAN AND ANIMAL HEALTH
           | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK114485/
           | 
           | Much of modern medicine depends on antibiotics. The above
           | resources give clear and compelling evidence that overuse of
           | antibiotics in livestock is associated with increases in
           | drug-resistant infections in humans.
        
         | FirmwareBurner wrote:
         | _> How about we require ranchers to decrease their animal
         | density so they don't need to use so many antibiotics?_
         | 
         | That would massively drive up meat prices and anger voting
         | consumers who won't be able to afford meant anymore, and also
         | anger voting meat producers who will go bankrupt from slumping
         | sales and have to lay off workers, all of which who will direct
         | their anger at the politicians who restricted the use of
         | antibiotics in animal farms. So not gonna happen politically.
         | 
         | Consumers have to either accept higher meat prices (not gonna
         | happen), or accept that we're too many consumers on the planet
         | for everyone to be fed with organically grown meat (also not
         | gonna happen), so we just kick the can down the road and sweep
         | the dirt under the rug until the titanic hits the iceberg and
         | there's no way forward anymore.
         | 
         | Here in the rich EU countries we have some rules and
         | regulations on meat production, but enforcement is very lax and
         | it's an open secret that those certification seals of approval
         | are basically worthless as animals are still caged together
         | crowded in their own filth, with massively infected open wounds
         | full of puss, and pumped full of antibiotics just to stay alive
         | long enough to become burgers. You should Google those images
         | if you want to become vegan but lack the motivation.
         | 
         | It's a political tragedy of the commons that's found in a lot
         | of other areas in our lives/society which we know for a fact
         | are wrong and are harming us (or others from less fortunate
         | parts of the world), but we still stick to them because they're
         | very profitable industries generating $$$ and jobs, and they're
         | such a tight part of our daily lives, they're nearly impossible
         | to undo today, like all the pollution from car dependence,
         | microplastics, the cheap cocoa and coffee industries driven by
         | slave labor, etc.
         | 
         | See the dead body spaghetti episode from Rick and Morty, it's
         | pretty good satire on our collective hypocrisy on this topic.
         | 
         | We know those are all bad, but we choose to look the other way
         | and not do anything about it because we love our lifestyles
         | with cheap car traveling, cheap shipping, cheap meat, cheap
         | coffee, cheap clothing, etc. and all the associated profits.
        
           | omginternets wrote:
           | I'd rather pay a bit more for meat than be forced down the
           | path of questionable meat-substitutes. Maybe meat has been
           | unsustainably cheap for a long time?
           | 
           | I am quite far from the vegan ideology, but still willing to
           | recognize that there is something untenable about our current
           | relationship with livestock.
        
             | ihattendorf wrote:
             | That's great, but unless you can convince the rest of the
             | world to pay more for meat or eat less meat nothing will
             | change.
        
               | omginternets wrote:
               | Sure, same argument applies to fake meat.
        
         | whatshisface wrote:
         | Because doctors and farmers have more effective representation
         | than anyone who looks at the whole.
        
         | flukus wrote:
         | > yet we tend to only hear about how humans need to cut back
         | 
         | There's also financial reasons to do so, with livestock the
         | financial reasons are likely reversed.
         | 
         | Beside that, anti-biotics also have side effects that can make
         | you more sick, their use is not just unnecessary but counter
         | productive. Some of the side effects can be serious and long
         | term, like changing your gut bacteria.
        
         | meany wrote:
         | At least in the US there has been recent progress on this. The
         | USDA just released new rules on June 11, 2023.
         | 
         | https://extension.umn.edu/news/over-counter-livestock-antibi...
         | 
         | Starting June 11, 2023, all currently available over-the-
         | counter antibiotics for livestock will be available only as
         | prescription medications. This new rule will impact all
         | livestock species. Over-the-counter antibiotics are moving to
         | prescription only to provide more veterinary oversight. Similar
         | to the Veterinary Feed Directive, placing antibiotics under the
         | supervision of veterinarians should result in more judicious
         | use and less antibiotic resistance.
         | 
         | This change includes but is not limited to the following:
         | Penicillin, Oxytetracycline, Sulfa antibiotics and Mastitis
         | tubes. Some medications are not considered crucial for human
         | medicine and will remain over-the-counter. This includes the
         | following: Ionophores including Rumensin and Bovatec,
         | Parasiticides, such as Ivermectin, Oral pre/pro/postbiotics,
         | and topical non-antibiotic treatments.
         | 
         | Livestock producers must have a valid Veterinary-Client-Patient
         | Relationship (VCPR) in place before they can be prescribed
         | antibiotics by a veterinarian. A VCPR is a working relationship
         | between a veterinarian (veterinary clinic) and a client.
         | Ideally, a VCPR is a documented agreement between both parties
         | that includes a dedicated visit to the animal location(s) the
         | client operates. This visit and documentation must occur at
         | least once every year to maintain the VCPR.
        
         | alkonaut wrote:
         | I don't buy meat from anywhere you can give healthy livestock
         | antibiotics, period. It's really easy (obviously in case you
         | live in such a country you'd be forced to not buy meat or buy
         | imported, which is more expensive and worse for the
         | environment).
        
           | renewiltord wrote:
           | How to determine this? Do you have to analyse supply chain or
           | do you just have no chain (i.e. you are near farm and you
           | know farm owner)?
        
             | lozenge wrote:
             | > In January 2022, the routine use of antibiotics was
             | banned in the EU, and preventative use was restricted to
             | exceptional treatments of individual animals
             | 
             | EU law is pretty strict about labelling meat coming from
             | the EU/outside the EU so that could be one way.
        
             | layer8 wrote:
             | Organic meat generally implies no antibiotics, for example
             | under the USDA label.
        
             | alkonaut wrote:
             | I just look at the flag and know which countries have good
             | meat. E.g. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/antibiotic-
             | usage-in-lives...
             | 
             | There may be local regulations or labellings to (e.g. some
             | organic labeling means no antibiotic and so on). But as a
             | first rule I just try to avoid meat from "bad" countries.
             | E.g. we get quite a lot of imported Brazilian beef in
             | stores and I know it's terrible both for deforestation and
             | antibiotics so I avoid that completely. Some interesting
             | differences in the map is e.g. between Australia And NZ.
        
           | peyton wrote:
           | Where is metaphylaxis banned? That's like a basic tenet.
        
         | treypitt wrote:
         | Obviously because that would require people cut back on meat
         | consumption. I was struck by a recent study indicating most men
         | would rather die young than stop eating meat:
         | https://www.menshealth.com/uk/nutrition/a36261605/red-meat-h...
        
           | bimguy wrote:
           | "most men would rather die young than stop eating meat"
           | Seriously, you're going to phrase it like that? How about
           | this, I enjoy a balanced diet and if that is going to kill me
           | young then so be it. If I was scared of dying I would be much
           | more worried about the coat of plastic dust that lines the
           | entire planet, including vegetables being grown and the
           | grass/feed that animals eat, and the fact that I'm extremely
           | likely to die of cancer due to plastics everywhere, metal
           | particles everywhere, chemicals everywhere... if the meat
           | doesn't get me first.
        
           | tick_tock_tick wrote:
           | I mean who wouldn't? It's like asking someone would you
           | rather suffer your whole life or live 95% of it but enjoy it.
        
       | mjsweet wrote:
       | I had a chest infection lasting months from mid-june to mid-
       | October, and despite a run of Moxy, then Augmentin, then Roxy,
       | and finally Cefalexin, nothing worked. Out of options, I tried a
       | friend's suggestion: raw garlic and honey. After three weeks, my
       | symptoms and long COVID issues improved. It was a stubborn
       | infection that caused me to over-relying on antibiotics, as the
       | article suggests. Makes me wonder about GP's exploring
       | alternatives, especially with rising drug resistance.
        
         | Waterluvian wrote:
         | I found that three weeks + water worked when I had a similar
         | issue. To be honest the water _felt_ good. I envisioned peeing
         | as a way to flush the badness out despite knowing that's just
         | not really how it works.
        
           | mantas wrote:
           | You feeling better drinking water certainly did help.
        
             | Waterluvian wrote:
             | Yeah, like water obviously helps. And the placebo of
             | imagining like... "sickness" being flushed out helps too.
        
         | martinky24 wrote:
         | Extremely scientific anecdote you got there!
        
       | ricardobeat wrote:
       | 1/3 of the population in _one year_? That 's insane. I've only
       | taken antibiotics once in my entire life, and can count on my
       | fingers the amount of times someone mentioned taking them in the
       | last decade. Are doctors prescribing antibiotics for the flu?
        
         | siquick wrote:
         | Lived in Australia for over 10 years and can confirm that GPs
         | here are, on the whole, pretty useless. Most appointments last
         | under 2 minutes and end with a script, usually antibiotics of
         | some kind.
         | 
         | I had covid recently and a woman at work who had identical
         | symptoms but wasn't testing positive went to the GP and was
         | prescribed antibiotics.
        
           | tppiotrowski wrote:
           | I thought the GPs were just fine but it's true that they do
           | offer antibiotics almost every time you have a cold. In the
           | US, you would demand them from your doctor and they would say
           | no.
           | 
           | Whether it was placebo or not, it did usually seem to make me
           | feel better.
        
             | ykonstant wrote:
             | > I thought the GPs were just fine but it's true that they
             | do offer antibiotics almost every time you have a cold.
             | 
             | Those two sentences contradict each other; it is a very
             | irresponsible thing to do. Also, yes, if every time you
             | have a cold, you get antibiotics and they make you feel
             | better, it is placebo.
        
         | dj_mc_merlin wrote:
         | Here in Germany doctors only give them for bad infections that
         | have the potential to turn worse. Cat scratches (actually quite
         | dangerous!), bad throat or stomach infections. I've only taken
         | them 2-3 times this decade I guess but I've seen them mentioned
         | way more often than you. People and doctors here prefer natural
         | recovery with some tea and vitamins to pills if possible, which
         | is nice.
        
           | alkonaut wrote:
           | "Bad infections" I really hope you mean bad _bacterial_
           | infections. If doctors give antibiotics for viral infections
           | (e.g. respiratory infections they fear will become bacterial
           | secondary infections) then we in the rest of the world really
           | need to tell Germany to stop it. Preventive antibiotics is
           | useful for the really vulnerable and chronically ill _only_.
           | 
           | Here they even stopped for many bacterial infections e.g.
           | typical strep infections and so on, so long as the body takes
           | care of it. I.e. no antibiotics just to shorten the disease
           | period.
        
             | dj_mc_merlin wrote:
             | Yes, obviously. They're doctors, they understand that.
        
             | timeagain wrote:
             | The reality on the ground for a doctor is that they don't
             | always have time to do fancy microscope/lab testing. Skin
             | sore looks infected? Antibiotics. If there's a 30%
             | likelihood it is a bacterial infection and a .0000000001%
             | chance that the patient develops super-MRSA, the choice is
             | clear.
        
               | alkonaut wrote:
               | In my (quite limited) experience the prescription of
               | topical antibiotics like that is not down as much as the
               | oral and injected. Not sure why. Perhaps because because
               | the diagnostics is difficult. Or it's because that kind
               | of antibiotics have lower risk of aiding the development
               | of resistant bacteria. Or there just aren't as many
               | alternatives.
        
               | BobaFloutist wrote:
               | Ah yes a .0000000001% chance that the patient develops
               | super-MRSA, the disease that gets its characteristic
               | deadliness from _Multiple Resistances_ to antibiotics,
               | which bacteria develop when antibiotics are overused.
               | Sounds like a great reason to over prescribe antibiotics.
        
             | JTbane wrote:
             | My anecdote from the US is that usually my primary care
             | doctor will do a rapid streptococcus test if I come in with
             | a sore throat, and only prescribe antibiotics if it comes
             | back positive. That seems responsible enough for me.
        
               | alkonaut wrote:
               | Yeah mine would say "you are in your 40's and healthy so
               | I won't prescribe antibiotics unless it doesn't get
               | better in a week". But that as I said is fairly new and
               | quite specific to sore throat from streps.
        
       | jjcm wrote:
       | I found this to be pretty true while Living in Australia. I was
       | always surprised at how cavalier doctors were about giving these
       | out. I think it stems from two things - one is what they quoted
       | in the article, that there's a "cultural expectation in Australia
       | that there's a pill or a tablet for every problem". People who go
       | to the doctor expect a solution.
       | 
       | I suspect the other thing is how often Australians go to the
       | doctor. Americans tend to be pretty hesitant to see doctors due
       | to pricing of health care. In Australia, if you're sick, you go
       | to the doctor. This is true even for common colds. Some stats, in
       | 2010 Americans saw the doctor on average around 3.9 times a year
       | (and this number is on a downward trend from the previous
       | survey)[0]. In Australia this number is a bit harder to break
       | down. Some politicians have cited that on average people see a
       | doctor 11 times a year. Medicare stats breakdowns put that number
       | at somewhere closer to 7[1]. Either way, it's a significant
       | increase in comparison to Americans. It's more common to go see
       | the doctor.
       | 
       | Unfortunately the article doesn't cite their sources here. One
       | thing I'd be very curious about is _what percentage of doctor
       | visits result in antibiotics_ when comparing Australia vs the
       | United States. My hypothesis is that despite cultural pressures,
       | it may actually be that prescription rates per visit are quite
       | similar between the two countries, and it 's just that
       | Australians seen the doctor more often.
       | 
       | [0]
       | https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/health_car...
       | [1]
       | https://www.servicesaustralia.gov.au/sites/default/files/doc...
        
         | nradov wrote:
         | I don't have the reference handy, but I read a study of US
         | healthcare which found patient satisfaction to be highly
         | correlated with whether they got a prescription at the end of
         | an office visit. With a prescription the patients felt like
         | they were getting their money's worth.
        
         | climb_stealth wrote:
         | Hah, I wonder how people do it. The past few times I wanted to
         | see my GP the appointments had lead times of 6 weeks or more.
         | And they weren't bulk-billed.
         | 
         | I'd joke that by then the issue would have either gone away or
         | I'd be dead.
        
           | caf wrote:
           | Call first thing when the office opens (often 8am) and you
           | often get something because they tend to save a couple of
           | slots for same-day appointments.
        
         | caf wrote:
         | The report in question points the finger at hospital
         | prescribing rather than GPs, though.
        
       | wdeasy wrote:
       | I can confirm, they hand it out at the doctors in Australia for
       | almost anything. I used to get sinus infections more than twice a
       | year and they would give me antibiotics without testing if it was
       | bacterial of viral. I started to refuse them few years ago and
       | start to use salt water rinse which worked way better
        
       | lysndr wrote:
       | Ah yes. The country that allows you to buy laughing gas cream
       | chargers and cadmium filled vapes at every second convenience
       | store needs something which is already restricted access to
       | fiddle with.
       | 
       | After Codeine, paracetamol packs, will the legal cupidity of
       | these people ever be satiated? It is easier for me to get then
       | stickiest weed known to man prescribed in this country than it is
       | to get pain relief for an ear infection. But sure, we're one more
       | rule or guideline away from utopia. Will anyone actually oppose
       | the Pharmacy Guild/RACGP/AMA axis in this country, as they are so
       | useless?
        
       | iteratethis wrote:
       | I'm from the Netherlands and once visited our Brazil office.
       | 
       | One of my colleagues there seemed to be having a pretty bad cold
       | so he exited our meeting. One hour later he was back, said he
       | took antibiotics, and felt fine now.
       | 
       | My jaw dropped. Dutch doctors are the opposite, as expats
       | commonly complain about. Our first method of treatment (for
       | various symptoms) is to send you back home and sit it out for a
       | few days. Or just take some aspirins.
       | 
       | The idea being that your body will heal itself over various ills,
       | and that this is the preferred way.
       | 
       | My mind was also blown when I heard that in many countries,
       | people have medical cabinets at home. It being common that the
       | typical non-senior adult has a stock with a wide array of
       | medicines.
       | 
       | I was raised on zero medicines, unless there's something
       | critically wrong. Even taking an aspirin makes you a bit of a
       | wimp.
       | 
       | Cultural differences I guess.
        
         | NoPicklez wrote:
         | As an Australian I am surprised of this article. I hardly ever
         | take any medications at all let alone antibiotics willy nilly.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-11-15 23:00 UTC)