[HN Gopher] Show HN: GPT-4-Vision UX audit for your landing page...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Show HN: GPT-4-Vision UX audit for your landing page (relaunch)
        
       Last week, I got seriously fascinated by the new GPT-4 Vision API
       introduced on OpenAI DevDay, so I decided to build a UX Audit tool
       with this API.  It's pretty simple to use - just go to
       https://flawless.is and enter your homepage or landing page URL.
       I'm using the urlbox API to get a screenshot of your page, then I
       utilize GPT-4V to analyze the screenshot, find potential usability
       and conversion issues, suggest fixes, and highlight the relevant
       areas in the screenshot (although the position is sometimes
       inaccurate).  Last week, I launched it on Hacker News
       (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38207892), but I wasn't ready
       for the 20,000 visitors that came next... Unfortunately, GPT-4V has
       a rate limit of 100 events daily, so almost no one could use the
       service - EPIC FAIL.  To manage demand, I now priced the service at
       $1.99 (still less than a cup of coffee), which should keep the
       demand at bay, and also cover the costs of GPT-4V, the screenshot
       API, and hosting.  As a proof of concept, there are some demo
       audits on the homepage you can click and check out.  Please let me
       know your thoughts and suggestions on how to improve it!
        
       Author : liorgrossman
       Score  : 4 points
       Date   : 2023-11-14 17:58 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (flawless.is)
 (TXT) w3m dump (flawless.is)
        
       | imranhou wrote:
       | The feedback for Slack is a hit and miss, for example it
       | considers the signup buttons too small, or customer logos too
       | small - is there an issue with its perception or mine?
       | Additionally down below it says button color matches background
       | which isn't true, but other sister buttons may be, which is
       | misleading. At the end of this, I think some parts are useful,
       | but not sure by how much when I have to sift through and ignore
       | the other parts....
       | 
       | Is it possible to adjust the prompts to address some of this? or
       | have a second to run validate the output?
        
         | liorgrossman wrote:
         | All great points, thank you!
         | 
         | I think GPT-4V perception of size might be distorted, since it
         | downsizes everything to be 512px wide before scanning it. I
         | wonder how can this be overcome, I'll try to play with the
         | prompts to instruct it specifically about sizes.
         | 
         | Regarding the "Meet Slack for Enterprise" - you're right, it is
         | weird, looks like it's hallucinating. I'll try and dig deeper.
        
       | Broiling3167 wrote:
       | It is not clear what aspect of the payment is "one time", please
       | clarify this!
       | 
       | Is it per-domain or per-email?
       | 
       | Rerunning the same domain takes me to checkout again, and I
       | didn't receive an email so I'm lost.
        
         | liorgrossman wrote:
         | Thanks for giving it a try.
         | 
         | One time meaning you are charged $1.99 one time, and you can
         | audit one URL, the one you've chosen on the main page.
         | 
         | After you pay, it takes you to a unique URL with a token. Might
         | be a good idea to send users email with this URL...
         | 
         | There's no concept of logging in or logging out right now,
         | that's why that URL is important. It looks something like this:
         | https://flawless.is/audit?url=https%3A%2F%2Fslack.com%2F&t=1...
         | 
         | If you can't find this URL in your browser history, please ping
         | me at lior at lifehacklabs.org, and I'll restore this URL and
         | send it to you!
        
           | Broiling3167 wrote:
           | Thank you, I did find that url now.
           | 
           | I'm still confused though, let's say I "fix" all the problems
           | it gave me, and afterwards if I want to run it again with
           | those fixes, I will need to pay again?
        
       | artur_makly wrote:
       | Any Senior UX folks here that can review the quality
       | recommendations shown on the audit results posted on this site? A
       | quick glance shows some dubious suggestions. Still better than no
       | UX audit.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-11-14 23:02 UTC)