[HN Gopher] Tesla Cybertruck Owners Will Face Absurd Resell Pena...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Tesla Cybertruck Owners Will Face Absurd Resell Penalties
        
       Author : rntn
       Score  : 22 points
       Date   : 2023-11-13 18:54 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (gizmodo.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (gizmodo.com)
        
       | h2odragon wrote:
       | Just admit they can be remote controlled and call them home when
       | the "owners" displease you.
       | 
       | That might be a little rank even for Musk. Make it part of the
       | EULA. "By opening the door you agree to ..." Add an NDA clause.
       | 
       | If these are "bulletproof"; could someone be kidnapped by their
       | car? I was gonna make a crack about keeping a window breaker
       | handy in case the door locks got overridden but even that might
       | not work.
        
         | neuromanser wrote:
         | Just keep a brick in the glove compartment.
        
           | m463 wrote:
           | Don't you mean a giant ball bearing? :)
        
         | jstarfish wrote:
         | > call them home when the "owners" displease you
         | 
         | You're not being inventive enough. Drivers are not liable when
         | autopilot fails. _Neither is Tesla._
         | 
         | If it gets into an "accident" involving a body of water,
         | electromechanical locks and bulletproof glass will seal your
         | fate...and nobody will be held accountable.
         | 
         | The New Model Y[andere]: You'll love it, _or else._
        
       | Detrytus wrote:
       | > The electric truck weighs 7,000 pounds according to Musk,
       | making it about as heavy as a Ford F-150, but can accelerate from
       | 0-60 in under 3 seconds.
       | 
       | Finally, the most missed feature in a pick-up truck is here!
       | 
       | > The futuristic-looking truck has a bulletproof, stainless steel
       | body and is "waterproof enough" to cross rivers like a boat,
       | among a long list of claims that only seem beneficial during an
       | apocalypse.
       | 
       | This, however might actually be useful, given the current
       | geopolitical climate...
        
         | ccvannorman wrote:
         | Finally shaving off that precious 0.6 seconds from the 0-60
         | time..
         | 
         | * Ford F-150 0-60 Times ; 2023 Ford F-150. Raptor R SuperCrew
         | (5'7.1" Bed) * 3.6 sec
        
           | KindAndFriendly wrote:
           | Talking about irrelevant stats, the Raptor can do 3.6 sec
           | pulls all day long. Curious to see the Cybertrucks
           | repeatability here...
        
         | danans wrote:
         | > This, however might actually be useful, given the current
         | geopolitical climate...
         | 
         | You must have missed Elon's marketing pivot a some years ago
         | from libertarian tech-utopianism to libertarian tech-
         | dystopianism.
        
           | sidibe wrote:
           | As an SF resident who never goes outside but reads Elon's X
           | feed, you would be crazy to live here and not buy a
           | bulletproof Cybertruck. I will wait until it arrives to go
           | out.
        
             | danans wrote:
             | > As an SF resident who never goes outside but reads Elon's
             | X feed
             | 
             | Indeed, you sound like the target market for the
             | cybertruck, but if that's what you are feeling in SF, I
             | seriously doubt that vehicle will solve your issue with
             | never going outside.
             | 
             | It's quite difficult to enjoy all that the city has to
             | offer from inside a vehicle, and there are certainly other
             | places that can provide you in particular much more
             | psychological safety than SF.
             | 
             | Sure, you could drive it from your own guarded parking in
             | SF to a destination with guarded parking in SF, but that is
             | a pretty limited set of places.
        
               | yumraj wrote:
               | I'm pretty sure the person is being sarcastic..
        
               | danans wrote:
               | Ha. Good call. I see it now, although TBH in recent times
               | I've heard similar sentiments expressed quite
               | unsarcastically, so an "/s" would be charitable.
        
             | JohnFen wrote:
             | Just hope that it's more bulletproof than the windows are
             | rockproof.
        
         | hedora wrote:
         | I was going to chime in to make fun of the paltry towing
         | capacity I assumed it had, but it's rated to 14,000 lbs. That
         | is significantly higher than the F-150 electric's 7700-10,000
         | lbs.
        
         | m463 wrote:
         | Man: "I'm a marketing manager who lives in the suburbs
         | and commutes to work on the highway. I live alone, so
         | of course I needed a car that can seat 12 and is
         | equipped to drive across arctic tundra...it just         makes
         | me feel better!"             Woman: "The new Maibatsu
         | Monstrosity...mine's bigger!"
         | 
         | - GTA 3
        
       | gamblor956 wrote:
       | As previously discussed in other HN threads from last week, these
       | penalties are DOA. Some of them, such as the liquidated "damages"
       | clause which is clearly just a penalties clause, are straight up
       | illegal. Courts will punish parties attempting to enforce a
       | penalties clause, usually by requiring them to pay the opposing
       | parties' legal fees.
        
         | Arrath wrote:
         | I would love to see a detailed legal breakdown and examination
         | of how many of the clauses in this contract are complete,
         | utter, unenforceable horseshit.
        
       | sonicanatidae wrote:
       | Talk about a big ole bag of, "yeah, you can keep this horse
       | shit".
        
       | pfannkuchen wrote:
       | This is pretty obviously intended to prevent essentially scalpers
       | from selling the early units for massive profit. Not sure why
       | people are mad about this? South Africa man bad?
        
         | carstenhag wrote:
         | Because after paying in full for it, it's your decision what to
         | do with it. Compress it into a steel cube, sell it, drive it.
        
         | 3cats-in-a-coat wrote:
         | If you jail everyone, you'd have jailed all criminals, too.
         | Therefore you could say "pretty obviously intended to stop
         | criminals". But punishing everyone because of a malicious
         | minority defeats the point of your entire action.
         | 
         | They could've just as easily prevented scalping by saying "you
         | can sell your CyberTruck, but for not even a dollar more than
         | the purchase price."
         | 
         | Curious how that's NOT what they said, isn't it?
        
       | jdsully wrote:
       | Ford made me sign a contract similar to this when I bought a
       | Bronco sport. I was annoyed the dealer sprung it on me at the
       | very end when I was getting the keys, but didn't plan to resell
       | in the first year anyways.
        
         | fabiensanglard wrote:
         | Is that even legal, to ask you to sign that after you paid for
         | it? Or was it before?
        
       | ChrisArchitect wrote:
       | [dupe]
       | 
       | More discussion over here:
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38237287
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38236701
        
       | haliskerbas wrote:
       | And when the pieces don't fit together, no one faces a penalty.
       | 
       | https://insideevs.com/news/694929/tesla-cybertruck-matte-bla...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-11-13 23:02 UTC)