[HN Gopher] How to attach logic probes to tiny SMD components (2...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       How to attach logic probes to tiny SMD components (2021)
        
       Author : dcminter
       Score  : 80 points
       Date   : 2023-11-12 11:08 UTC (11 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (reddit.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (reddit.com)
        
       | dcminter wrote:
       | Sharing this reddit thread because I was looking to solve this
       | problem myself and thought that the needle-probe approach linked
       | was terrific!
       | 
       | Hackaday summary: https://hackaday.com/2019/11/15/needling-your-
       | projects-3d-pr...
       | 
       | Model for 3D printing: https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3615910
        
       | eschneider wrote:
       | Hardware engineers who leave documented test points are my
       | favorite people.
        
         | analog31 wrote:
         | You're welcome. ;-) Likewise to software engineers who leave
         | "hooks" to internal functionality, so we hardware folks can
         | create automated tests.
        
       | markild wrote:
       | As is mentioned in the post, there are very sleek off the shelf
       | solutions.[0]
       | 
       | I find their oscilloscope probes especially enticing.
       | 
       | [0]: https://sensepeek.com/
        
         | adhesive_wombat wrote:
         | These really are lovely things. I only have the DMM ones, and
         | rigged up a scope probe holder, but I'll be getting more of
         | them.
         | 
         | The use of M4 screws on the older models at least is very
         | helpful for DIYing custom fittings (even without the real SMD
         | nuts, brass nuts can be soldered to PCB stripboard)
         | 
         | The stands are great too.
        
         | YiraldyGuber wrote:
         | I have a bunch of these. They're great, except for being
         | frustratingly "floppy" at times. Imagine huddling over a PCB
         | carefully positioning all these probes, not daring to
         | breathe... only for the slightest brush to send them all
         | tumbling over like dominoes. More than a few curse words have
         | been let loose over this gear, but I couldn't do without them.
         | 
         | It looks like they have new ones that address this: "The new SQ
         | series of handsfree probes from Sensepeek have a lower point of
         | gravity making them even more stable compared with the original
         | SP series of handsfree probes."
        
           | ofrzeta wrote:
           | > making them even more stable
           | 
           | Not related to the topic but it seems this marketing blurb
           | has become the norm: They can't say they fixed something
           | without claiming that it was already very good. I've come to
           | hate this. No, they are not now "even more stable", "we made
           | them more stable" because honestly they weren't that stable
           | to begin with.
        
           | ghosty141 wrote:
           | We have them at work too, like you said they are too floppy
           | and you gotta be extremely careful not to touch anything,
           | especially if the point you are testing is very tiny. Apart
           | from that they are great but yeah, there needs to be a way to
           | fix them in place.
        
           | anymouse123456 wrote:
           | I'm considering buying these. Are you saying they're floppy
           | as in, the bendable part doesn't hold it's shape? or floppy
           | as in, the magnet isn't strong enough and the whole thing
           | falls down?
           | 
           | I'm assuming there's a magnet. I hope these aren't just using
           | weight to hold their position....
        
             | kedikedi wrote:
             | One side has a magnet, and it firmly attaches the base
             | board (steel). But the other side just has the pogo and is
             | fixed there just by the weight of the thing. It works good
             | if there's enough "bite" and the rest of the system applies
             | force the right way. If not, we'll, it slides off.
             | 
             | In my case for example, it is excellent for test points but
             | somewhat challenging with soldered SMD component pads and
             | very challenging if the density is high.
        
               | adhesive_wombat wrote:
               | If you're able to solder on and the signal can stand the
               | stub, a little dot of copper tape on top of the IC and a
               | tiny wire down to the lead in question and soldered on
               | can help give an easier "hitbox". You can add the ground
               | pad as well next to it and use the spring for the probe.
        
             | adhesive_wombat wrote:
             | I find the magnet is usable but weaker then I'd like if the
             | steel is under an ESD mat, which are usual 2mm thick. If
             | anything they're a just little bit too long which means
             | they can be slightly floppy in the cross-wise direction.
             | 
             | Thinking about it I might try a piece of low-profile bike
             | chain and a copper wire and see if I can do better.
        
             | YiraldyGuber wrote:
             | The magnet is very strong, no issue there.
             | 
             | I mean the 'bendable' part. The nearest consistency I can
             | think of would be a bag of sand. They are weighty but not
             | rigid. They are not designed to hold their shape.
             | Unfortunately this means that it takes very little sideways
             | force to make them "flop" over.
             | 
             | Still, I can't recommend them highly enough. I use them
             | _all the time_. Seriously, a PCBite plate with probes on-
             | hand is now a permanent fixture on my main desk. If you do
             | half as much fiddly electronics stuff as I do, they will
             | pay for themselves. But you will also occasionally find
             | them infuriating.
        
           | The_Double wrote:
           | I have bought the new SQ probes and went back to only buying
           | the older version.
           | 
           | The new ones are heavier, but that makes it harder to put
           | them at an angle, they fall over more quickly. And the probe
           | heads are bigger so you can't put as many close together.
        
           | jdietrich wrote:
           | I would strongly recommend adding a couple of dial indicator
           | stands to your kit. They are rather more bulky than the
           | included arms, but as they're designed for holding precise
           | mechanical measurement instruments they are rigid, stable and
           | can be very finely adjusted.
           | 
           | https://www.mcmaster.com/products/dial-indicator-stands/
           | 
           | For more complex probing, it is now remarkably
           | straightforward to 3D print a bed-of-nails test jig.
        
         | eschneider wrote:
         | I saw that and it's like...take my money!
        
         | atoav wrote:
         | Honestly I would just replace those flimsy arms with magnetic
         | measurement stands/articulated holders as they are used in
         | precision manufacturing:
         | https://www.noga.com/Products/hold/Holding%20System
         | 
         | But at that point you could also just put your own pogo pins on
         | somewhere.
        
         | calamari4065 wrote:
         | 200 euros for 4 100MHz and two logic probes and the entire
         | fixturing kit. Not too bad. I'm sure I can convince my boss to
         | buy these
        
       | nonrandomstring wrote:
       | Once I had a bunch of boards to test and rigged up a little
       | temporary "bed of nails"                    ________________ o
       | /    ____________ o <-- connector         |   /    _________o
       | |   |   /         |      ---T---T---T---T----[]           Where T
       | = sewing pins and --- = thick polystyrene sheet      Use finest
       | 30+ SWG wirewrap
       | 
       | The polystyrene gives a little bit of necessary springiness and
       | as long as you have two (preferably three) reliable anchor points
       | near the corners the pins will reliably find test points or the
       | contact points of SM resistors or caps.
       | 
       | It's good for about 10 contact points and 50 uses
        
       | beardyw wrote:
       | I use 30AWG (Kynar wire) for most things I build. I have it in
       | multiple colours which is helpful.
        
       | sebcat wrote:
       | PUR-coated copper wire, .15mm diameter is pretty good. .1mm when
       | needed. Use flux, good lightning and some (~10x) magnification.
        
       | onetimeuse92304 wrote:
       | Personally, I find the critical is to use good wire (the type
       | used in transformers), use a good soldering station with right
       | kind of tip, and plan a way to connect to your wires without
       | destroying entire setup.
       | 
       | I solder the wires to a short piece of FFC tape ending with a
       | connector. The tape and the connector are attached somewhere with
       | apiece of double sided adhesive tape. The end of the tape with
       | the wires is suspended in air nearby. I then individually solder
       | the wires to the test points.
       | 
       | I can then connect my test tools (scope / logic analyser / PSU /
       | DMM) directly to FFC connector easily. If I need more than one
       | tool, I would usually use one of my breakout boards with
       | connectors that make it easy to connect multiple test tools at
       | the same time (for example supply power AND connect the scope, or
       | maybe inject external signal to the chip on the board).
       | 
       | I would like to mention I don't do it frequently. This usually
       | only happens when I am having fun with an existing device. My own
       | devices usually have built in enough test points / test
       | connectors to not require this kind of shenanigans. I would
       | usually plan for one or more surface mount connectors that I will
       | only solder if I need it for some reason.
        
       | flyingcircus3 wrote:
       | Hot glue is good for strain relief. 30 gauge wire on tiny pads is
       | going to be extremely fragile. Shifting the mechanical stress to
       | the glue will make all of this more durable.
        
         | tverbeure wrote:
         | I prefer the UV hardening glue. Hot glue is a bit too messy for
         | my taste, the glue gun takes too much space on my already full
         | desk, and you need to wait for the thing to warm up.
        
           | analog31 wrote:
           | Ah, but you can peel it off. However, I agree that it's
           | messy. Do take precautions when working with UV. It's both an
           | eye and skin hazard.
        
           | bogantech wrote:
           | The trick is to ditch the glue gun - cut off a piece of glue
           | stick, place it where you need it and hit it with the hot-air
        
       | tverbeure wrote:
       | Instead of regular test points, I'm now adding u.fl/ipex
       | connectors to my PCBs. They're small enough to not be in the way
       | for most cases, and it's so much easier to just plug in a
       | connector instead of messing around with probes.
       | 
       | They're around 3 cents (yes, $0.03) a piece on LCSC:
       | https://www.lcsc.com/product-detail/_BAT-WIRELESS-_C5137195.....
        
         | kevin_thibedeau wrote:
         | I make my vias large enough to accept a 30AWG wire (15 mil
         | hole). Slip in a precut/stripped wire, tack it with solder,
         | trim to length, and you have an instant testpoint in a usually
         | optimal location near the point of interest. Advantages are
         | that you can't accidentally rip a pad off the board, it's
         | accessible from both sides, and minimal board area is consumed.
        
           | kurthr wrote:
           | If you're doing anything more than 2-4 layer PCBs, I'd make
           | one more caveat... through-hole-via! It makes getting to test
           | points much easier from both sides of the board, and if
           | you're using pogo-pin testers, helps align the pins.
           | 
           | Unfortunately, if you're doing anything highspeed (>100MHz)
           | or differential, then such vias (except at connectors) are
           | highly frowned upon since they increase loading, crosstalk,
           | imbalance, and reflections.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-11-12 23:00 UTC)