[HN Gopher] Apple admits third-party app stores in Europe are in...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Apple admits third-party app stores in Europe are inevitable
        
       Author : elorant
       Score  : 46 points
       Date   : 2023-11-11 19:55 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (appleinsider.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (appleinsider.com)
        
       | placatedmayhem wrote:
       | Is allowing direct install from internet (like how most desktop
       | applications work) also required by the DMA? Or are all
       | developers of independent apps going to be required to publish
       | their app to some app store?
        
         | Varloom wrote:
         | No, there will be 3rd party App stores (approved by EU) where
         | developers can release their Apps.
        
       | codetrotter wrote:
       | I for one look forward the most to seeing the equivalent of the
       | F-Droid store coming to iOS. Either from the people behind the
       | original F-Droid, or from some group of people with similar
       | ideals like them.
       | 
       | However, I wonder if that will enable apps that corporations
       | don't want to exist, to exist on iOS. I.e. BitTorrent clients,
       | alternate YouTube frontends that use yt-dlp to play YouTube
       | videos without ads, etc.
       | 
       | The apps still need to be signed with a developer account right?
       | And so Apple will still be able to deny signing certain apps /
       | blacklist those apps when they receive complaints, right?
        
         | Varloom wrote:
         | I'm pretty sure one of the first app stores we'll see is Meta
         | App Store.
         | 
         | The deliberate delay in releasing the Threads app in the EU,
         | without any clear reason, makes me believe that they intend to
         | make it an exclusive offering of the Meta store.
        
           | Moldoteck wrote:
           | It doesn't make any sense... Why threads ia related to meta
           | store?
        
           | bsjaux628 wrote:
           | Or, instead of conspiracy theories, why don't we go for most
           | plausible cause? That the app is a privacy nightmare that in
           | now way could pass the GDPR filter? As if Facebook had
           | anything more to offer in his "store" other than Facebook,
           | whatsapp and Instagram.
        
             | ericmay wrote:
             | I agree that Threads may be a "privacy nightmare" and so
             | that may limit its deployment to Europe, but is it really a
             | _conspiracy theory_ to suggest that Meta will release their
             | latest products (and maybe move current ones) to their own
             | Meta App Store once Apple is forced to allow 3rd-party app
             | stores? That seems less of a conspiracy to me and more of a
             | natural consequence, and Meta won't be alone here either.
             | 
             | Many have said "that's not what happened on Android" and
             | that's true, however I think that's true only because
             | everyone is waiting for the iPhone to be forced to change
             | and then you release your own store across both platforms.
             | It seems likely to me it's not worth it to do it on Android
             | alone - kind of like releasing an Android-only app. You'd
             | want both an Android and iOS version of your app. The costs
             | and duplication of infrastructure probably doesn't make
             | sense for one operating system but does for two.
        
           | manuelmoreale wrote:
           | Threads is not available in the EU because it would likely
           | surpass the 45M users and hence be subjected to all the
           | various rules under the new DSA and it's my understanding
           | that the threads team is currently small and meta probably
           | doesn't want to allocate a ton of resources to it yet.
        
         | tobyjsullivan wrote:
         | If memory serves correctly, signing certificates are issued to
         | developers and signing is done locally on the build machine.
         | 
         | Apple cannot deny signing on a per-app basis. They could revoke
         | a developer's certificate perhaps, but that's something else.
         | 
         | They may co-sign a binary in the App Store but that seems
         | irrelevant for other distribution channels.
        
       | clumsysmurf wrote:
       | I hope this happens in the US as well, Google has become a
       | terrible partner for Android developers.
       | 
       | This past week Google announced (1) that in order to release an
       | app on Play:
       | 
       | "developers with newly created personal Play Console accounts
       | will soon be required to test their apps with at least 20 people
       | for a minimum of two weeks before applying for access to
       | production."
       | 
       | This will be gamed (test farms), and the policy will not achieve
       | any goal but making life difficult for small / indie developers.
       | 
       | (1) https://android-
       | developers.googleblog.com/2023/11/ensuring-h...
        
         | flykespice wrote:
         | Google is really trying so hard to surpass Apple Store on being
         | a worse experience for developers.
         | 
         | It's almost as if Google forgot what makes Android so appealing
         | as open platform to mobile developers compared to IOs locked
         | platform.
        
           | clumsysmurf wrote:
           | I honestly wonder what Andy Rubin thinks of what Android has
           | become in the hands of Google ...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-11-11 23:01 UTC)