[HN Gopher] Smokers Should Be Screened for Lung Cancer-Even If T...
___________________________________________________________________
Smokers Should Be Screened for Lung Cancer-Even If They Quit Long
Ago
Author : Brajeshwar
Score : 7 points
Date : 2023-11-08 16:00 UTC (7 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.smithsonianmag.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.smithsonianmag.com)
| RationalDino wrote:
| This ties to an important fact about how cancer works.
|
| A cell has a long journey to becoming cancerous. It involves cell
| damage that is imperfectly repaired. A cell once injured is
| therefore liable to become cancer, but may not take the next step
| for decades.
|
| When you stop smoking, you stop injuring more cells. But the
| injured ones are still there. You can think of them as like
| little time bombs, waiting to go off. A process that is likely to
| take decades. So even decades later, you should worry.
|
| We convinced large numbers of people to stop smoking. Yay, us! We
| told them that smoking causes cancer. We were right. But we
| didn't go around advertising, "If you've been a smoker, you're
| never getting rid of your increased risk." Because that would
| have been demotivating.
|
| Maybe we should have still been honest? Then my brother-in-law
| wouldn't have been so shocked when he got lung cancer from a
| habit that he had quit some 20 years earlier.
| JohnFen wrote:
| > But we didn't go around advertising, "If you've been a
| smoker, you're never getting rid of your increased risk."
| Because that would have been demotivating.
|
| Honestly, learning this makes me regret quitting smoking a bit.
|
| Just a bit, though, because the main risk with smoking isn't
| cancer, it's emphysema.
| pfdietz wrote:
| A good reason for screening is the greatly increased viability of
| treatments for non-small cell lung cancer. (Small cell, you're
| still pretty much screwed.)
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-11-08 23:02 UTC)