[HN Gopher] Library Genesis in Numbers: Mapping the Underground ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Library Genesis in Numbers: Mapping the Underground Flow of
       Knowledge (2018) [pdf]
        
       Author : simonpure
       Score  : 144 points
       Date   : 2023-11-05 20:50 UTC (3 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (direct.mit.edu)
 (TXT) w3m dump (direct.mit.edu)
        
       | Xerox9213 wrote:
       | Interesting. The authors focused a lot on competing with market
       | vs archival purposes. For me, and I reckon a lot of other people,
       | I used libgen because I just want a PDF or epub that is not
       | muddied with DRM or behind a university wall. Most of the books I
       | download I already have a paper copy of, but want to be able to
       | use it digitally. For me it's all about convenience. I guess that
       | would be pretty hard to measure.
        
         | unixhero wrote:
         | I used it to not have to pay.
         | 
         | I buy 10 books per year off Amazon and the occasional Economist
         | magazine. I am of course not paying for academic journal access
         | or tons of academic books outside my field.
        
           | dacryn wrote:
           | I use it to wade through the masses.
           | 
           | Download 10 ebooks on a subject, scroll through, read a few
           | excerpts, and the one that I actually start reading, I buy
           | from amazon or a local bookstore and actually read it.
           | 
           | Many books look great, but once you start reading them, are
           | total garbage. This is in the field of IT literature though,
           | so books tend to be very hit or miss, and quickly outdated.
        
         | kqr wrote:
         | This is close to my use case as well. I mainly buy e-books
         | these days, but they are often published as an afterthought[1]
         | and not designed for readers - things like maths and plots get
         | mangled in the process and vary from excellent to completely
         | unreadable. So I want something closer to the physical book to
         | look up the equations and visuals, but I don't want to have to
         | go to the library[2] for each one. A PDF scan of the print book
         | is very convenient.
         | 
         | [1] Sometimes they are literally an OCR of the print book! You
         | can tell because of the symbol substitutions.
         | 
         | [2] Even most digital libraries I've tried are very
         | inconvenient to "go to". Archive.org might be the exception.
        
           | posterboy wrote:
           | > Sometimes they are literally an OCR of the print book! You
           | can tell because of the symbol substitutions.
           | 
           | Not really. TEX for example does a lot of weird character
           | substitution behind the scenes to mangle the layout.
        
             | InitialLastName wrote:
             | how often does TEX substitute "rn" for "m" though?
        
         | fyokdrigd wrote:
         | it's actually very easy to measure. the audience here is close
         | to the 1%, so your usecase is already discarded in the grand
         | scheme with a 2% error margin when measuring behavior for the
         | large population.
        
           | vmfunction wrote:
           | Yup hnews is not a good place to do market research for
           | general population.
        
           | crest wrote:
           | But it is a good place to get an insight into what _could_
           | motivate enough technically minded (and connected) people to
           | sustain such risky projects.
        
         | LesZedCB wrote:
         | my friend in college bought texts books before the first
         | semester when their parents took them to the book store. then a
         | classmate showed them libgen and didn't buy any more text books
         | except the one weird custom textbook by some professor.
         | 
         | i guess they buy all their books now that they have a job, but
         | also with generous use of used book stores and physical
         | libraries.
         | 
         | oh and dont buy though amazon, especially kindle.
        
           | aegypti wrote:
           | This pretty much mirrors my experience exactly, but these
           | days I lean a lot more heavily on the Libby app for borrowing
           | from my library which is _amazing_.
           | 
           | What's the issue with Amazon/Kindle though, the fakes?
        
             | LesZedCB wrote:
             | their de-facto monopoly status on basically all things
             | books and increasingly on publishing, and of course their
             | absolutely inane DRM.
             | 
             | libby is amazing, people are completely sleeping on it if
             | you're not using it. free e-books!
        
           | wolverine876 wrote:
           | Talking to some students, I'm told that people often freely
           | pass a book on to the next semester's students.
        
       | eclecticfrank wrote:
       | Libgen fills an important gap in the paid archives/libraries.
       | There are always some books, papers or articles that are not
       | available through my university library.
       | 
       | It's a huge help to have documents available immediately and not
       | having to pay a small fortune for a single document that might
       | prove irrelevant.
        
       | uniqueuid wrote:
       | Great to see this here.
       | 
       | The author Balazs Bodo is an all around great guy with very
       | refreshing research methods and an immensely broad portfolio of
       | things he works on [1].
       | 
       | [1]
       | https://www.uva.nl/en/profile/b/o/b.bodo/b.bodo.html#Publica...
        
       | crvdgc wrote:
       | Interesting research. However, in practical terms, I wouldn't
       | count Kindle as a form of digital availability, unless the book
       | is composed of pure text.
       | 
       | Browsing figures or tables is usually a very bad experience. The
       | figures are usually in low resolution. And the tables are
       | sometime just pictures. Even if the publisher bothered to encode
       | the table as a table, if it spans over one screen size,
       | navigation becomes very hard. Not to mention symbols and
       | formulas.
        
       | hodanli wrote:
       | This is an incredibly valuable resource for those outside of the
       | US and EU, where the prices for books in English (imported) are
       | extremely high.
        
       | JacobSeated wrote:
       | Not to devalue the tireless work of authors, but we must also
       | recognize that students in particular do not have enough money to
       | pay for all these books.
       | 
       | At the same time, it can be argued that writing a single book,
       | and selling it thousands times over, is a bit to "easy" in terms
       | of ways to make money. The hard part is to get people to actually
       | buy your book - it does not matter that you wrote the best book
       | in the world if nobody gives you well deserved attention for it.
       | 
       | Bloggers suffer from the same problem, and it is not necessarily
       | because their work is bad. The truth of the matter just is,
       | nobody cares about quality information anymore (And I am guilty
       | of this as well).
       | 
       | We want fast and summarized answers so we can move on to the
       | important part: solving whatever concrete problem we are working
       | on.
       | 
       | AI will probably delude the little remaining value of information
       | even further, and at a point, nobody will manually write
       | comprehensive information anymore. At least not unassisted by AI,
       | and while the quality may suffer, we must also realize that we do
       | not really need 100% accurate information. If we get a
       | statistically significant amout of accurate AI provided
       | information, then there is no need for anyone to write books
       | anymore. It will be a complete unappreciated waste of their time,
       | and nobody is going to buy them.
       | 
       | Even now that I am in a decent job, I still prefer not to buy
       | books, instead relying on free sources on the internet (not
       | piracy). If a given book/information is not available for free,
       | then it is often not important enough for me to bother (note
       | often - not always).
       | 
       | It is also a matter of prioritizing - reading a book takes me way
       | too long, and the process is far-from comfortable due to my slow
       | reading, and for that reason alone I tend to avoid reading entire
       | books. It strikes me as an antiquated way to gain information
       | even without AI. I may open a specific chapter of interest, but
       | reading the entire thing is painfully tedious, and probably
       | unnecessary.
        
         | squigz wrote:
         | Why do people buy books now, instead of just reading reviews?
        
           | eclecticfrank wrote:
           | Obvious troll, but anyway: Reviews are there to help identify
           | if books are worth reading/buying. Reviews cannot and are not
           | supposed to replace books.
        
             | squigz wrote:
             | Well I'm certainly not trolling you but okay. Have a good
             | day.
        
           | sycamoretrees wrote:
           | Why do people go to see movies when they could just watch the
           | trailer on YouTube?
        
             | squigz wrote:
             | Well I'm not the one claiming people are going to stop
             | reading because of AI, so I'm not the one to ask :)
        
           | DiggyJohnson wrote:
           | I don't understand this question. Book reviews are not
           | summaries. And even they were, "why do people read books,
           | instead of just reading summaries?" is still a ridiculous
           | question.
        
             | squigz wrote:
             | It is ridiculous. That's the point. Same as suggesting
             | people would stop reading books in favor of summaries
             | written by AI
             | 
             | And indeed, 'review' was the wrong word to use, but I
             | appreciate you understanding what I meant
        
               | agumonkey wrote:
               | people do watch movies / show in 1.5x now.. it's common.
        
         | charcircuit wrote:
         | >but we must also recognize that students in particular do not
         | have enough money to pay for all these books.
         | 
         | Sure they do. They happen to be able to pay for food, water,
         | electricity, rent, tuition, transportation, pens, pencils,
         | paper, etc just fine.
        
           | fragmede wrote:
           | by "just fine", you mean "go into crippling amounts of debt
           | that isn't dischargeable by bankruptcy"?
        
           | JR1427 wrote:
           | Academic books are terribly expensive.
           | 
           | When I was at university (Oxford, UK, 2009), I bought about
           | four key books, and spent well over 100GBP. I simply couldn't
           | afford more. I had a student loan which covered tuition and
           | some of my living costs, as well as a bursary from the
           | university which covered some of my other living costs (but
           | not all!).
           | 
           | What was annoying was that our library didn't have enough
           | books for all the students. We'd all be assigned the same
           | reading list for the week, and then have to race to the
           | library to get the books before they were all gone.
        
           | abridges6523 wrote:
           | "Just fine" here means riddled with debt.
        
           | gizajob wrote:
           | If people could download any of those things for free off the
           | internet, they would.
        
           | webefbskj wrote:
           | Imagine someone from a 3rd world country. Let's say India.
           | 
           | Even the books like K&R C, Tanenbaum operating systems or
           | CLRS / Skienna Algorithms will be north of 1000 INR in India.
           | 
           | Count 5 - 6 such books per semester, that's at least 5k - 10k
           | INR. But for obscure books the price often goes to 5K for a
           | single book. Let's say 10K INR.
           | 
           | Which is a significant amount, and for some students can
           | exceed a month's living expenses for a semester.
           | 
           | So they're hesitant to spend that much. Often they end up
           | with shittily written local books.
           | 
           | Now imagine you want to consult some book for specialist
           | topics, like Windows internals or something, you will have to
           | sell an organ.
           | 
           | Source: I was the Indian student.
        
         | taopai wrote:
         | I read lots of non fiction books. I think the same.
         | 
         | Most of them could condense it's contents in a couple of
         | chapters.
         | 
         | It would be great to have modular books, like Emacs manual. If
         | sections where independent modules you could rearange the book
         | or even create books from a series of sections from diferent
         | books.
         | 
         | That way you could choose different outlines, maybe predefined
         | by the author like, to create books tailed to your needs:
         | 
         | - General Ideas.
         | 
         | - General Ideas + observed cases
         | 
         | - Mixed outline (Concepts + Stories + Conclusions)
         | 
         | - All details about one topic
        
           | generalizations wrote:
           | This is what's done with sufficiently academic books in the
           | hard sciences. They are so modular, that books are simply
           | topics with each chapter written by a chosen author, and
           | those authors will treat the chapters they've written
           | similarly to papers they've had published.
           | 
           | I think if you dive deeper in to more rigorous nonfiction
           | books you'll find that less time is spent on the 'pop' side
           | of popsci literature. Which might be where you're
           | encountering that fluff.
        
         | fikama wrote:
         | I am curious, what books you found important enough to bother?
         | So my list of (shame) books to read could grow even longer.
        
       | Cenk wrote:
       | If you are interested in Library Genesis (and shadow libraries in
       | general) I can recommend this book by Joe Karaganis:
       | https://boook.link/Shadow-Libraries
        
         | abridges6523 wrote:
         | But which shadow library can I find this book on?
        
           | Funes- wrote:
           | Just click on "PDF".
        
             | ajsnigrutin wrote:
             | PDFs suck on e-readers.
             | 
             | But you can get an epub on at least one of the shadow
             | libraries :)
        
               | t-3 wrote:
               | They aren't too bad with modern reader software, you can
               | automatically trim margins and set the viewport size and
               | scan pattern to match the text (makes double-column
               | papers much nicer to read).
        
       | bigbacaloa wrote:
       | In Spain my home internet provider (Movistar) blocks access to
       | LibGen and the like. My university, however, does not. It
       | realizes that de facto these sources serve as the library for its
       | professors. So I wind up having to connect through the university
       | VPN anyway ...
        
       | dzonga wrote:
       | library genesis is a god-send.
       | 
       | there's plenty of out of print books or that you won't find at
       | specialized retailers but would find on lib-gen.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-11-08 23:02 UTC)