[HN Gopher] Diffractive Solar Sail
___________________________________________________________________
Diffractive Solar Sail
Author : Savely
Score : 39 points
Date : 2023-11-03 15:39 UTC (7 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (en.wikipedia.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (en.wikipedia.org)
| jspann wrote:
| I'm always caught off guard whenever I see Rochester Institute of
| Technology (RIT) or the City of Rochester in general mentioned
| anywhere. I just don't expect it. I know Rochester is a former
| U.S. Boomtown and has a major historical presence in the U.S. but
| with the great leaps other cities made in Rochester's decline I
| don't jump to the idea of seeing Rochester mentioned unless it is
| about lasers.
|
| That being said, Rochester is an up and coming city and I say
| that more emphatically with each passing year. Pittsburgh is a
| great case study, but when combined with a Great Lake, quality of
| life, infrastructure for big business (including the people and
| schools who are still there), and the talent that closely
| surrounds the city on all sides (Boston, NYC, Toronto, Chicago,
| Pittsburgh), future growth is inevitable.
| actionfromafar wrote:
| And Eastman Kodak!
|
| https://newyorkphotonics.org/2019/12/04/kodaks-enduring-lega...
| kurthr wrote:
| It's interesting, but there's no reason you can't do both
| reflection and diffraction. A refractive grating allows most
| light to pass through, but reflective gratings use smaller
| (sometimes less than half wavelength) steps/spacings to diffract
| different wavelengths.
|
| What is interesting to me is that you should be able to stretch
| the grating (as well as rotate relative to perpendicular
| incidence) to change the effective periodicity/wavelength, and
| also what effect that would actually have (on angle and
| efficiency).
|
| Perhaps one advantage of refracting diffraction is that blue
| light (with the largest momentum) might bend to larger angles?
| But that would also depend on the grating size/angle. A rotating
| grating with a blaze angle might allow the most flexibility.
| mitthrowaway2 wrote:
| The Wikipedia article lists several advantages relative to
| reflective solar sails, but there's also a major disadvantage not
| mentioned. A reflected photon imparts twice its momentum to the
| solar sail, whereas a diffracted photon imparts only a small
| portion of its momentum. The overall thrust would therefore be
| much lower than a reflective solar sail. The fact that "photons
| can be reused... by passing through a second diffraction grating
| for more thrust" is not an advantage but rather a testament to
| the lower efficiency of the diffractive sail.
|
| Perhaps that's offset by the other advantages, but this is not
| clear.
| monocasa wrote:
| I'm not sure that's necessarily the case.
|
| A reflected photon can only impart half of its momentum before
| it's barreling off away from you.
|
| Several layers of diffractive sails would seem to be able to
| (at least theoretically) exceed that.
| AnimalMuppet wrote:
| A reflected photon imparts _twice_ its momentum.
| monocasa wrote:
| Momentum was the wrong word, but it feels like layers of
| diffraction could red shift the light more, absorbing more
| energy out of each photon.
| jiggawatts wrote:
| ... which just heats up the sail.
|
| To _move_ , you want to absorb momentum, not energy.
| woleium wrote:
| Correct as per Newtonian physics, bit shit gets weird
| when you go quantum :)
| monocasa wrote:
| At the scale of individual particles, heat _is_ movement.
| ianburrell wrote:
| Heat is random movement. Infrared photons go in random
| directions, not the direction wanting to go. Some go in
| the wrong direction.
|
| Reflection means solar sail goes in direction you want to
| go.
| mitthrowaway2 wrote:
| The light reflected from a mirror is already red-shifted
| due to the velocity of the mirror.
| monocasa wrote:
| Which is why I said red shift _more_.
| littlestymaar wrote:
| Stupid question, where does the energy comes from?
|
| With reflection, I see how you can harvest energy through red-
| shift (the reflected photon ends up with a lower frequency after
| it bounces due to Doppler effect, which means it lost energy and
| gave it to the sail as kinetic energy), but here I don't really
| understand were the energy comes from.
| kurthr wrote:
| It's momentum transfer from deflecting (diffracting) the light
| through an angle. Similarly, any photon would be slightly red-
| shifted after hitting the surface whether it goes through or
| reflects off.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-11-03 23:02 UTC)