[HN Gopher] Images from the 2023 Nikon Small World Photomicrogra...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Images from the 2023 Nikon Small World Photomicrography Competition
        
       Author : daoboy
       Score  : 127 points
       Date   : 2023-10-27 19:54 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nikonsmallworld.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nikonsmallworld.com)
        
       | emptybits wrote:
       | Travelling the universe at this scale seems as important and
       | amazing to me as travelling to a distant star. The igniting
       | matchstick image has so much going on!
       | 
       | One cringe though ... the images all seem excessively post-
       | processed to me. Unrealistically saturated, contrasted,
       | sharpened, etc. The colour, especially, just seems over the top
       | and I feel like seeing these microscopic subjects enlarged is
       | mind-blowing enough without the postprocessing distraction which
       | makes it seem _less_ real.
       | 
       | Anyways, amazing images! Thanks!
        
         | belval wrote:
         | To my untrained eye I don't understand why #1 is #1, #2 has
         | more interesting details and demonstrates much more skills.
         | Perhaps I don't understand the evaluation parameters though, #1
         | is probably a bigger technical achievement.
        
           | c2occnw wrote:
           | Since it's a photomicrography competition, 20X magnification
           | vs 2.5X may play a factor in the judging?
        
           | deepsun wrote:
           | Not sure it demonstrates much more skills (lighting a match
           | vs. extracting an optical nerve and differentiating it to
           | proteins, glials and vasculature).
        
             | belval wrote:
             | I meant photography skills, clearly most people can strike
             | a match.
        
         | CamperBob2 wrote:
         | I'm of two minds about the processing... if adding lots of
         | artificial color, sharpening, and contrast brings out the
         | detail(s) the researcher is looking for without actually
         | altering them, then it seems like fair game.
         | 
         | But yes, the raw photos would be nice to see as well, just for
         | comparison's sake. That may be easier said than done given the
         | prevalence of image stacking.
        
         | dekhn wrote:
         | One thing to note is that the fluorescence images like
         | https://www.nikonsmallworld.com/galleries/2023-photomicrogra...
         | are false color. In those systems, you typically excite a
         | specific fluorophore, one at a time (once for each type in the
         | sample), and read out the result with a monochromatic camera
         | through frequency-specific filters. The final image is
         | composited with the grayscale intensity mapped to color value.
         | 
         | I don't think the microscopy images underwent sharpening,
         | although I'm not certain.
         | 
         | My friend who works in the field prefers to look at individual
         | color planes in monochrome (no color at all) rather than the
         | super-saturated composites.
        
       | CrzyLngPwd wrote:
       | I love it, thank you for sharing.
        
       | nuancebydefault wrote:
       | I understand why there are not many comments on this article. The
       | images are amazing, they speak for themselves!
        
       | lrc wrote:
       | The 18th place entry (A cryptocrystalline micrometeorite resting
       | on a #80 testing sieve) is like a still from the original
       | Andromeda Strain movie
        
         | dekhn wrote:
         | Compare: https://cdn.theasc.com/Andromeda-Strain-Spore.jpg to
         | https://www.nikonsmallworld.com/images/photos/2023/18th-2023...
         | 
         | good memory :)
        
           | mitthrowaway2 wrote:
           | Wow. I wonder if the photo was a deliberate homage.
        
             | dekhn wrote:
             | I wondered the same thing but then I concluded it was
             | coincidental. If you're trying to filter for meteorites,
             | you're going to be using that exactly hardware (a wire mesh
             | basket), using a level of magnification that gives a view
             | of the retained object, whose size is similar to the mesh
             | screen hole diameter.
             | 
             | I would imagine that the props department went to a nearby
             | micrometerologist who gave them a basket with a micron mesh
             | and maybe some small volcanic rocks.
        
       | hypertele-Xii wrote:
       | The carbon nanotubes looks oddly AI-generated to my eyes.
       | 
       | https://www.nikonsmallworld.com/images/photos/2023/_photo160...
        
         | sergioisidoro wrote:
         | We posted the same comment at the exact same moment.
        
         | schleck8 wrote:
         | Definitely. Could be GAN superresolution artefacts though
        
       | sergioisidoro wrote:
       | The 16th place, "Carbon Nanotubes" really struck me as being
       | generated by some AI. It has many of these hallmark
       | "hallucination"-like features that we find in AI images.
       | 
       | Am I not able to distinguish between reality and AI anymore?
        
       | itronitron wrote:
       | Those are all amazing photographs.
        
       | mlsu wrote:
       | Wow, the matchstick image is so striking (literally, ha ha ha).
       | 
       | I looked and the same photographer took 6th in last year's
       | competition for this:
       | 
       | https://www.nikonsmallworld.com/galleries/2022-photomicrogra...
       | 
       | Such amazing images!
        
         | jonplackett wrote:
         | Those top two images are head snd shoulders above the rest.
         | 
         | I expect there were some arguments about who should win. I'd
         | have given to the match personally.
        
       | goguy wrote:
       | The caffeine crystals one is wild.
        
       | munificent wrote:
       | That trichinella cyst photo [1] is by Nathan Myhrvold [2], who is
       | a name some here might recognize. He got rich as an early
       | executive at Microsoft, used that to start a patent troll firm,
       | and then got _really_ into cooking.
       | 
       | His six-volume "Modernist Cuisine" is like the "The Art of
       | Computer Programming" for molecular gastronomy.
       | 
       | [1]:
       | https://www.nikonsmallworld.com/galleries/2023-photomicrogra...
       | 
       | [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan_Myhrvold
        
         | dekhn wrote:
         | He also built a nifty scope for photographing snowflakes.
         | https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/10/science/snowflakes-photos...
         | 
         | It looks like he embedded it in a pelican case, I see some
         | tubes probably for cooling the plate.
         | 
         | IIRC he was a physicist before he worked at Microsoft.
        
         | satvikpendem wrote:
         | Your _Crafting Interpreters_ is not bad yourself!
        
       | digging wrote:
       | Anyone with chemistry chops here able to explain what I'm seeing
       | in #11 "Crystallized sugar syrup"? I do macrophotography myself
       | and know roughly what 25x means, but I'm having trouble even
       | parsing the scale of these structures. Sugar crystallizes in
       | sheets?
        
       | omoikane wrote:
       | Be sure to browse the video gallery as well:
       | 
       | https://www.nikonsmallworld.com/galleries/small-world-in-mot...
        
       | dzonga wrote:
       | these are beautiful photos.
       | 
       | they inspire me.
       | 
       | what would be the cheapest way to get into this as a hobby ? I
       | understand hobbies are expensive but sometimes with minimal time,
       | you wanna reduce costs.
        
         | ishtanbul wrote:
         | buy extension tubes for a DSLR camera. you will quickly learn
         | to appreciate the challenges of focusing and lighting at that
         | scale.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-10-27 23:00 UTC)