[HN Gopher] Why I can no longer recommend a Mac to fellow blind ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Why I can no longer recommend a Mac to fellow blind computer users
        
       Author : devinprater
       Score  : 147 points
       Date   : 2023-10-08 19:59 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.applevis.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.applevis.com)
        
       | fatih-erikli wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
         | Almondsetat wrote:
         | Apple is the best brand accessibility wise, unless we are
         | talking about some insignificant niche products
        
           | fatih-erikli wrote:
           | This is correct. Apple is first when it comes to
           | accessibility. However accessibility isn't invented for the
           | blind.
        
           | pxc wrote:
           | Accessibility isn't a homogenous, fungible quantity. Calling
           | something 'the best brand accessibility wise' is barely even
           | meaningful, let alone useful.
           | 
           | Accessibility is a qualitative issue, and disabled people's
           | needs are varied enough that many accessibility tools are
           | only helpful or usable to a subset of them.
        
         | jitl wrote:
         | There's so much wrong with your post:
         | 
         | - Blind users and other disabled people are often
         | professionals.
         | 
         | - Apple is very much a personal computer company. They make
         | iMovie, Photos, Apple TV, Pages, etc for personal end users. If
         | you've used some of Apple's pro apps like Final Cut or Logic,
         | you'd know they can design for pro users - but macOS as a whole
         | is the opposite, getting more simplistic over time as they
         | cater more to consumers. The Mac is a good pro computer _IN
         | SPITE_ of it being designed for consumers.
         | 
         | - many people in the blind community are dishonest? Wtf. This
         | just sounds like discrimination to me.
        
           | fatih-erikli wrote:
           | [flagged]
        
             | pxc wrote:
             | > as a professional in the IT industry, my recommendation
             | to the my colleagues, don't fall for someone if they say
             | they have a disability and demand something. It's not our
             | concern.
             | 
             | Supplying your end users the tools they need to do their
             | work is absolutely your job. What do you even mean?
        
             | tmpX7dMeXU wrote:
             | Im going to pile on here and implore you as best I can to
             | check your priors here. You are coming across as incredibly
             | rude and unhinged. I'm sorry that a blind person...hurt you
             | at some point? I don't even know. But your behaviour is
             | frankly unacceptable.
        
               | fatih-erikli wrote:
               | I didn't get hurt, however they have a ratio of
               | disability. Dishonesty starts at that point. Some see
               | 10%, some 20%, etc. Anyone in that community will need to
               | weigh their morality whether they really see or not, this
               | is why I don't recommend my collages to spend their time
               | and being emotionally vulnerable in that topic.
        
         | upon_drumhead wrote:
         | I'm confused as to your statement. So you're saying blind
         | computer users shouldn't be recommending what they feel works
         | for them to fellow blind computer users? Only people who are
         | getting paid to review should recommend experience?
         | 
         | Also, are you saying that blind computer users can't use a wide
         | assortment of computers? I have a buddy who is blind and is a
         | developer and they happen to have a top end MacBook Pro and
         | uses it quite well. I don't think that calling them a -low-
         | user makes any sense at all.
        
           | fatih-erikli wrote:
           | end user = low user. I may be wrong in this definition. Feel
           | free to interpret my statements in any way you'd like. I
           | observed a lot. There are so much inconsistency their
           | behaviors, plus dishonesty.
           | 
           | I feel happy for your blind fellow and respect.
        
             | n_sweep wrote:
             | this is an incredibly bizarre prejudice to hold
        
       | miki123211 wrote:
       | I have been a regular Mac user for over two years (MacBook Air
       | M1) and the issue is far less severe than this person claims.
       | 
       | It used to be a much bigger problem around Mac OS 12, but even
       | then, Cmd + option + q (quit and keep windows) would solve it
       | pretty quickly.
       | 
       | Voice Over has a lot of issues, but so do Windows screen readers,
       | and as a Mac user, I can at least decide to postpone an
       | accessibility-breaking update, something which Windows doesn't
       | let me do. Such an update was one of the main reasons why I
       | switched OSes.
        
         | devinprater wrote:
         | I'm glad you don't experience this anymore. I wish I could say
         | the same. Of course, I have a 2019 MBP so no M1, and I'm not
         | rich enough to just go out there and buy it when I hear it
         | effects even M2 models. I don't bet an issues that hault
         | productivity that much.
        
       | the_mitsuhiko wrote:
       | Not blind, I have no experience at all with any of this. However
       | what I found quite impressive was witnessing an Apple Store
       | employee guide a blind person through voice over. That to me
       | implies that Apple at least trains some folks in the stores on
       | accessibility features.
        
         | devinprater wrote:
         | Yep. Sometimes they even hire blind people to do it. There was
         | one at the Apple Store I went to when I first was looking into
         | a Mac. Years later, I heard he left though, moving into another
         | field.
        
       | chrismorgan wrote:
       | I was expecting some sort of systemic problem across the
       | operating system, but it seems to be just one specific bug in
       | WebKit--though there is also a link to "our recent post on
       | problems in macOS Sonoma and the replies", and though it does
       | sound to be a rather debilitating bug for affected users, and
       | though this sort of bug making it to production _can_ be a
       | symptom of systemic problems in the organisation.
        
         | PaulHoule wrote:
         | One fault can leave a platform 100% broken.
        
       | spacedcowboy wrote:
       | I am curious what he's going to recommend instead. AFAIK, Macs
       | are the best out there (by quite some way) for accessibility.
        
         | shados wrote:
         | Windows with JAWS or NVDA is fairly mainstream, and it's
         | accessibility features are pretty well understood and
         | supported. VoiceOver less so. That only covers one facet of
         | accessibility of course, but they have like 80 percent market
         | share in that segment.
        
         | eddythompson80 wrote:
         | Last time I saw a poll of blind CS/engineering students across
         | NA, the wide majority preferred JAWS as a screen reader. That
         | implies Windows.
        
         | devinprater wrote:
         | Most of us use Windows.
        
       | devinprater wrote:
       | Blog post from Applevis Subtitle: Why I Can No Longer Recommend a
       | Mac to Fellow Blind Computer Users
       | 
       | I don't mean to editorialize, the title was just too long for the
       | title box.
        
         | dang wrote:
         | Yup, the limit is 80 chars so it needs to be chopped. In this
         | case the suffix is more informative than the prefix so I've
         | swapped out "We deserve better from Apple" above. Thanks!
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | tmpX7dMeXU wrote:
       | I certainly don't want to discount from the point this article is
       | making, but as someone with a significant visual impairment, but
       | that is not completely blind, I legitimately can't imagine using
       | anything that's not macOS these days. This is coming from someone
       | that grew up using Windows, and had an extensive Linux
       | phase...including Gentoo.
       | 
       | Screen readers are a bit of a lightning rod for accessible
       | technology interest, almost entirely because most people have
       | some sort of sick curiosity. "How can someone use a computer so
       | differently to the way that I do!?". Of course, most of these
       | people stop here, never bothering to try using a screen reader to
       | navigate whatever they're making. They might open VoiceOver,
       | realise they don't know how to intuitively use it, and fumble
       | around with trying to close it again. This tends to have the
       | effect of sucking any motivation out of the room. Most people
       | won't then go and meaningfully improve their screen reader
       | experience, but they also won't think to address any other
       | accessibility shortcomings, especially visual ones, because
       | "blind people use screen readers!" Is the pervasive meme.
       | 
       | This is part of why I am all in all so happy with how Apple has
       | been going in this space lately. An obvious result of co-design /
       | consultation, or dare I say it...hiring people with disabilities.
       | Addressing accessibility concerns that the stereotypical SV
       | techie has never even heard of.
        
       | rock_artist wrote:
       | From developer POV this is real frustrating. This seems like
       | something that makes bad experience but at least in the post
       | there are no reproducible steps. Also when a bug shows only
       | sometimes, if it's rare enough, sometimes it's really hard to
       | nail down. I guess Apple's metrics are superior to mine. Yet,
       | sometimes just catching an issue is tough.
       | 
       | The other complication with Apple is the fact that sometimes it
       | might be needed for multiple teams to fix an issue (eg. WebKit,
       | Safari and VoiceOver/Accessibility) so they all have their own
       | apple ways which might not be trivial as a single team fixing an
       | issue.
       | 
       | And least, yeah, it might just be prioritization as there are
       | some bugs that are with us for years or even regressions between
       | each OS iteration that stays forever.
        
       | devinprater wrote:
       | I tried using a mac (2019 MBP, 8 GB RAM, 4 Thunderbolt ports) at
       | work. I could create course material in Ulysses. I could manage
       | files and folders with Finder. I could even slowly navigate
       | through Moodle's stupid web interface. But then I had to start
       | using Google Docs, and a Salesforce instance. Google Docs works
       | reasonably well on Windows. I even gave a good enough of a bug
       | report for the orca maintainer to make it more responsive on
       | Linux with chrome. But Mac? I can't even begin to describe how
       | messy it is. VoiceOver goes in and out of the document, the
       | VoiceOver cursor gets stuck on menu items, that kind of messed
       | up, where even if I want to download the document for offline
       | usage, it's just... Frustrating enough for me to throw away the
       | MacBook, not (entirely) literally, and grab the windows machine
       | again.
       | 
       | Salesforce is slightly better except when you get to a table of
       | record entries, that table is empty. Simply, nothing there.
       | Luckily, I can use firefox to get around this. Or I can simply go
       | back to windows and not have _any_ of these problems. The web is
       | snappy again, there is no freezing up or not responding or busy
       | messages, nothing. It, amazingly for Windows, just works. And
       | that 's a shame for Apple.
        
       | alib wrote:
       | I'm very sorry to hear about your experience. That really sucks.
       | The fact we have a thriving browser ecosystem has got to count
       | for something though. Could you recommend people use Firefox
       | instead?
       | 
       | I have come to respect Apple in recent years for their focus on
       | and promotion of accessibility within the industry. They are
       | leading where others have often abrogated the responsibility to
       | build inclusive products. We should celebrate this.
       | 
       | Therefore this headline made me sad. I appreciate sometimes
       | drastic measures are required to persuade those with power to use
       | it to change things, and it does sound like this bug has been
       | around for too long. If Apple are serious about accessibility
       | they need to fix it.
       | 
       | I have read that the relentless release cycle at Apple does lead
       | to bugs like this never getting fixed. I hope this post gets
       | upvoted enough that someone with influence sees it, and ensures
       | that this one is different. Good luck!
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-10-08 23:00 UTC)