[HN Gopher] One in five Silicon Valley office buildings is vacant
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       One in five Silicon Valley office buildings is vacant
        
       Author : anigbrowl
       Score  : 42 points
       Date   : 2023-10-06 17:35 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (sfstandard.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (sfstandard.com)
        
       | kalupa wrote:
       | while this sucks for commercial property owners and the plethora
       | of businesses that have supported the office work life for so
       | long, time for them all to adapt and move on.
       | 
       | SF is a boom/bust town, they're used to it, right? </s>
        
       | jbverschoor wrote:
       | SF or the whole bay?
        
       | MrFoof wrote:
       | Two Class B office buildings totaling ~150,000 ft2 in Boston just
       | sold for $4.1M, when in 2016 they had previously sold for $16M
       | https://archive.ph/AADPP.
       | 
       | Here's the location: https://maps.app.goo.gl/ezkNUEPAVCJJ2rps8
       | Things to note:
       | 
       | * Within HALF A BLOCK of Boston Common
       | 
       | * Within one-to-two short blocks of THREE subway stations serving
       | THREE of the four subway lines
       | 
       | * A Dunkin' Donuts 30 seconds away on foot, with multiple other
       | cafes within a block.
       | 
       | So prime transit location for workers. However the occupancy of
       | the building has been crud for a long while (hence being sold),
       | and hence why it went for nearly 75% off in the auction.
       | 
       | And before anyone goes, "but what about the condition", take a
       | look for yourself (https://i.imgur.com/rubVC88.jpg not all photos
       | are the building). It's certainly not bad! No, it's not like a
       | top-end Class A skyscraper such as 101 Huntington or 200
       | Clarendon _(or newer stuff I 've not been in)_, but it's far from
       | garbage! It certainly appears to be Class B space, and I say that
       | as someone who _actually built out offices (as an employee, not
       | an architect)_ for two companies about 10-15 years ago!
       | 
       | The sale price works out to just $27.33/ft2. The monthly rent for
       | Class B in 2022 was $32-38/ft2. So these just sold for the (EDIT)
       | one year's rent of _Class C_ space. Yikes! Someone took _a bath_!
       | 
       | ------
       | 
       | There's no office demand. _Period._ Boston has no shortage of
       | vacant office space right now either, and even the buyers of
       | these two buildings are looking to repurpose them.
        
         | quickthrowman wrote:
         | > The monthly rent for Class B in 2022 was $32-38/ft2.
         | 
         | That is not the monthly lease rate. All commercial property
         | lease rates are quoted as dollars per square foot per year.
        
           | MrFoof wrote:
           | You are correct, my bad! Updated my post.
        
             | quickthrowman wrote:
             | Based on this tenant space listing [0] the building appears
             | to have around 40k sq ft of leasable space. That works out
             | to around 3.25 years of rent assuming 40k sq ft leasable at
             | $32/sq ft.
             | 
             | It's definitely not a good sign for commercial office
             | space, that's for sure.
             | 
             | US 30 year bonds are yielding 5%, that's much more
             | attractive than a half-leased Class B office tower with an
             | 8% mortgage right now.
             | 
             | [0] https://bradvisors.com/wp-
             | content/uploads/2019/04/33-41WestS...
             | 
             | P.S. Sorry about the nitpicking :)
        
         | mistrial9 wrote:
         | great market info and very relevant comp to SF in so many ways;
         | especially enjoy the implication that yes, long-term capital
         | holders do in fact measure value by "the distance to the donut
         | shop."
        
           | MrFoof wrote:
           | Dunks is a New England institution with a pretty fanatical
           | following, at least for the coffee.
           | 
           | To put things into perspective, until very recently, the Back
           | Bay subway and commuter rail station had TWO Dunkin' Donuts
           | inside the station, _within ~100 feet of each other_ , one on
           | each side of the platform _(on the floor above the
           | platforms)_. One was smaller than the other, but you could
           | literally hit someone in the other line with a thrown donut
           | they were that close.
        
             | astrange wrote:
             | SF also used to have two Starbucks across the street from
             | each other near Moscone.
             | 
             | But really, isn't that just one shop that happens to have a
             | railway running through it?
        
               | MrFoof wrote:
               | They were actually owned by different franchisees!
               | 
               | The spaces were significantly different as well. The one
               | that shut down was so small it couldn't even physically
               | accommodate the equipment to make the sandwiches!
        
               | extragood wrote:
               | I'm sure there are valid reasons for doing that, but
               | whenever I see multiple franchises within spitting
               | distance of one another, I can't help but be reminded of
               | Gob Bluth's "market research" for a 2nd banana stand in
               | Arrested Development:
               | 
               | > Did you know that more frozen bananas are sold right
               | here on this boardwalk than anywhere in the OC?
               | 
               | And of course he goes on to cannibalize the family's
               | original business.
        
       | dmitrygr wrote:
       | Good! We're 20% there!
        
       | shortrounddev2 wrote:
       | Good lol
        
       | juunpp wrote:
       | In SF you will find entire floors vacant while the homeless camp
       | outside.
        
       | paulddraper wrote:
       | Why when I go to the actual report does it say the vacancy rate
       | is 6.7%? [1]
       | 
       | [1] https://www.colliers.com/download-
       | article?itemId=4056e99d-17...
        
         | datadrivenangel wrote:
         | "The office market measured negative 1.8 million square feet in
         | net absorption, with the vacancy rate increasing 200 basis
         | points year-over-year to 12.5% while average asking rents
         | recorded $5.37 per square foot Full Service."
         | 
         | Looks like something around the definition of availability
         | versus vacancy rate?
         | 
         | If I'm trying to sublease my officespace, is it vacant if i'm
         | still paying my lease?
        
           | paulddraper wrote:
           | But I still don't know where 20% comes from.......
        
             | TiredGuy wrote:
             | They got that from the availability rate, not the vacancy
             | rate. You can see the percentages they list in the article
             | for each town correspond roughly to the "R&D Availability
             | Rates Select Silicon Valley Cities" figure on Page 5
        
               | huytersd wrote:
               | The availability rate sounds like it should be some
               | fraction of the vacancy rate, not the other way around.
        
               | marcinzm wrote:
               | But the overall rate across all cities is not 20% but
               | much lower. So the title is inaccurate even if it's true
               | in select cities.
        
       | leetcodesucks wrote:
       | [dead]
        
       | welon wrote:
       | [dead]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-10-06 23:02 UTC)