[HN Gopher] Never say no, but rarely say yes (2011)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Never say no, but rarely say yes (2011)
        
       Author : jger15
       Score  : 187 points
       Date   : 2023-10-01 11:01 UTC (11 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (longform.asmartbear.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (longform.asmartbear.com)
        
       | daneel_w wrote:
       | For _personal relations_ I will maintain that it 's always better
       | to be clear and give a straight yes or no. Nobody likes being
       | left hanging in uncertainty, and nobody likes people who always
       | do that to them - people who cannot even provide a "maybe" - when
       | asked even simple questions.
        
         | j7ake wrote:
         | Yeah it's definitely bad advice to try on your partner, or even
         | your boss /colleagues
        
         | yellow_lead wrote:
         | This article seems to only apply to job/sales quotes.
         | 
         | The title is a bit clickbaity, it's too general.
        
         | hammock wrote:
         | In that case you ought to be reframing the problem, answering a
         | different question that you are comfortable giving a definite
         | yes or no too.
         | 
         | For example,
         | 
         | Them: "Will you do x thing for me by year end?"
         | 
         | You: "Are you actually trying to solve y problem? What if I
         | refer you to Z person by end of day? Or start by bringing you
         | some research around X by end of month?"
         | 
         | Tbh the same applies to business not just personal
        
           | campbel wrote:
           | this person collaborates
        
       | zzzeek wrote:
       | say "yes" for things you aren't into doing but just make sure you
       | ask for super high amounts of money, so that you're happy if they
       | accept your offer.
       | 
       | nice theory for "getting more money is good" but doesn't work for
       | "I have no time". If people could package up "more time" for me
       | in some kind of interdimensional container, I'd be all set.
        
         | yayitswei wrote:
         | You can buy time with money (with some limitations).
        
         | ghaff wrote:
         | Yep. I'm almost certainly not going to cancel personal plans
         | especially for something that's "just business." However, if I
         | don't have any urgent plans and you want me to do some well-
         | scoped short-term job for you or even hop on a plane for a
         | consulting day, I'll probably do it for a fairly generous
         | hourly rate/per diem. But I won't be a bargain unless it's
         | something I really _want_ to do or could lead to some sort of
         | follow-on business.
        
         | xyzelement wrote:
         | If you end up in a situation where people consistently offer
         | you more money than you are otherwise getting, you will solve
         | the time problem by shifting to the more-money type work...
         | 
         | If your big (technically, your ask) isn't high enough to cause
         | you to make the time, the it's not high enough.
        
       | gumby wrote:
       | This is good advice that has also stood me well over the years.
       | 
       | If you are doing custom development you can also use this at a
       | finer level of granularity: charge a lot for parts of the project
       | you'd rather not do (even possibly pay a bonus for the poor
       | person on the team who draws the short straw and has to do that
       | part, and maintain it) and charge less for the parts the customer
       | might be on the fence about but you know will either make them
       | happy (though they don't realize it yet) and/or help you get
       | future business elsewhere.
        
         | gumby wrote:
         | To expand a little: look over the horizon. Imagine you are
         | thinking of expanding into the banking market at some point
         | down the road.
         | 
         | Customer A says, "hey, would you add a feature to your emoji
         | generator to interface with the ACH system?" Stupid request,
         | maintenance nightmare. But you might get paid to have one
         | person get some exposure to the horror show that is banking
         | APIs. Exposure that might later help you think a bit better
         | when it's time to start thinking about that market. Of course
         | charge a LOT because it's new and charge a LOT for the
         | maintenance contract. Maybe it helps you estimate engineering
         | and marketing budget, or maybe it helps you decide on a
         | different expansion path.
         | 
         | The converse is true too. Customer B wants hospital integration
         | so they can add cute emojis to messages like "hey, you've only
         | got four months to live. Have a nice day!" You're not stupid so
         | you know you never want to get anywhere near the tarpit of
         | medical software. So you can confidently say "no" (phrasing it,
         | "we don't believe we could honestly provide the necessary level
         | of support you'd require and don't want to let you down blah
         | blah blah").
        
       | hkon wrote:
       | The story would be better if I did not know the basis of it.
        
       | dang wrote:
       | Discussed at the time:
       | 
       |  _Never say "no," but rarely say "yes."_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2481213 - April 2011 (36
       | comments)
        
       | sourabh03agr wrote:
       | The title is catchy!
        
       | Obscurity4340 wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
       | chiefalchemist wrote:
       | > If they say "yes," you're happy because the terms or money are
       | so good, it more than compensates for the distraction, perhaps
       | funding the thing you really want to do.
       | 
       | Perhaps. Make sure you're high bar is high enough. Opportunity
       | cost is an underappreciated metric. The exceptional (read: as in
       | a rare exception well above average, mean, etc.) can be
       | addicting, and eventually self-defeating (read: before you know
       | it your temporary digital ditch digger stint gets less stint-y
       | and more permanent-esque). It's like a bad-ish romantic
       | relationship that goes on too long. Regrets, and the some.
       | 
       | If you're going to go this route, be certain to plan your exit.
       | For example, "The first X weeks are $Y per hour. After that we
       | revisit, if necessary." Baking this into the agreement will force
       | you at the end of X weeks to recalibrate the revenue vs the
       | opportunity costs.
       | 
       | In fact, for any type of contract work with too many unknowns
       | and/or too much possible career friction always include a time
       | limit along with the rate.
        
         | gregw2 wrote:
         | I think that's the virtue of setting a high price on what you
         | don't want to do as your "not saying no"/funding strategy.
         | 
         | It's a reflection of your perceived opportunity cost.
         | 
         | But you are right to suggest time-bounding your engagement up
         | front to avoid getting stuck in a local maxima.
         | 
         | Or, at a certain scale, have a segregated set of people doing
         | these requests where possible to limit and help govern the
         | distraction.
        
           | ghaff wrote:
           | There are things I don't really love doing like ghostwriting
           | company blogs but if the project is short and well-defined
           | (and is something I can actually do a good job of fairly
           | quickly), I'll take a few $K from you. I'd be much more
           | hesitant to commit to something more open-ended even if the
           | income stream were good if it were something I was doing
           | _strictly_ for the money.
        
           | chiefalchemist wrote:
           | The other thing I wanted to mention, aside from opportunity
           | cost, is risk. I'm not suggesting never leave your sweet
           | spot. That would be stupid on my part :)
           | 
           | However, as you leave your sweet spot, be aware (read:
           | beware) of what you don't know. Be aware of the fact that bad
           | decisions are very similar to trust...one slip and you've
           | lost 10x more than you anticipated. If you're going to leave
           | your sweet spot be sure you're prepared for the worse. It can
           | and does happen.
           | 
           | Put in real terms, over the years I've worked as a contractor
           | for a number of marketing / web dev agencies. The more
           | successful ones didn't get there from yes, they got there
           | because of no. No to projects beyond them. No to clients with
           | expectations out of proportion to budget. No for the win, so
           | to speak.
           | 
           | I've also seen those same agencies start to drink their own
           | Kool Aid. They get in a financial pinch and take on work /
           | clients they're not tuned for. For example, they don't have
           | the in house expertise in the technology / solution required.
           | Eventually the project costs more than it brings in *and* the
           | team is miserable, has lost faith, leaves the conpany, etc.
           | 
           | If you're leaving your sweet spot and you're not concerned,
           | you're probably doing it all wrong.
        
       | 29athrowaway wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
         | junon wrote:
         | Did you read the article? It's not about toxic positivity, it's
         | about how to craft "no" and "yes" such that they're not
         | absolute and can still make both sides happy. Has nothing to do
         | with feelings.
        
           | 29athrowaway wrote:
           | [flagged]
        
             | junon wrote:
             | I really, truly don't believe you read the article.
        
           | BLanen wrote:
           | > can still make both sides happy.
           | 
           | > Has nothing to do with feelings.
        
         | nailer wrote:
         | And also ruin your reputation.
        
       | lee wrote:
       | I have a similar anecdote in my career as a developer.
       | 
       | At the height of the financial crisis I was just 2 years out of
       | school and working for a small startup. Our first child was just
       | born, and I got fired from my job as they discovered I was trying
       | to bootstrap my side-project. There was no non-compete clauses in
       | my contract but the company used it as an excuse to avoid paying
       | me severance as they laid off a quarter of the staff the
       | following week.
       | 
       | So there I was, anxious that no one would hire a young developer
       | who has a tarnished work experience with a newborn at home.
       | 
       | I was desperate to just find some work. I eventually got two
       | offers with the exact same salary as the job I had gotten fired
       | from. One job sounded more appealing and offered me a chance to
       | learn and grow. The other was for a job to maintain an existing
       | legacy codebase for a struggling company that just went from 100
       | employees to 10. My wife suggested to just counter-offer with a
       | 50% increase for the unappealing job. If I didn't get it, it was
       | no big loss as I had another in hand. Sure enough, they accepted
       | and the job wasn't actually that bad in the end.
       | 
       | Strangely, when I look back everything turned out in the end for
       | me. I got a 50% pay raise and I also got to spend 3 months at
       | home with my newborn child while unemployed.
        
       | jameshart wrote:
       | Another lesson from this article:
       | 
       | If you land a $100/hr gig, and the work takes 90 minutes: _bill
       | the client $200_ , not $150!
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | londons_explore wrote:
       | Downside of this approach:
       | 
       | Often you are quoting a super high price because you don't want
       | the work and maybe it isn't really what you love to do or your
       | expertise.
       | 
       | But the buyer assumes you have a super high price because you're
       | the best and can charge what you're worth.
       | 
       | End result: The buyer is unhappy with your work, because you
       | priced as if you were a world leading expert and actually you are
       | learning on the job and don't want to be there anyway.
        
         | waisbrot wrote:
         | Maybe. In my experience, a more common case is that the buyer
         | has no way to evaluate value other than quoted price and so
         | they're actually _much happier_ with a huge price than they
         | would be with a smaller price for the same work.
        
           | Aurornis wrote:
           | You think they're happier to pay more than to pay less? I'm
           | having a hard time believing that hypothetical.
           | 
           | Regardless, companies that don't know how to evaluate the
           | value of quoted work will eventually figure out the value
           | later. A client that that is initially happy with a price
           | will likely become retroactively disappointed when they deal
           | with another contractor in the future who has more realistic
           | pricing.
           | 
           | In my experience contracting, I've encountered a lot of "You
           | paid _how much_ for this!?" situations when dealing with work
           | from prior contractors. Once they realize how bad and /or
           | overpriced the work of a prior contractor was, that person's
           | reputation is done. Ironically, the contractor will often try
           | to use them as references for other clients because they were
           | initially happy.
        
             | sokoloff wrote:
             | > You think they're happier to pay more than to pay less?
             | 
             | People are not rational consumers.
             | 
             | See the Palessi story from a few years ago:
             | https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/payless-sold-discount-
             | shoes...
             | 
             | Tl;dr: Payless Shoes, a discount shoe retailer, opened a
             | fake high-end store under the Palessi name and got fashion
             | influencers to gush about how great the shoes were. People
             | who actually bought such Palessi shoes probably were
             | happier with them than if they'd bought them at Payless.
        
               | tough wrote:
               | 1000$ wine always tastes better than 100$ one
        
               | bumby wrote:
               | Years ago, a luxury car company (I believe it was
               | Mercedes) did a study measuring demand with the same car
               | across a relatively wide range of prices. Contrary to
               | economic models that assume rational actors, there was a
               | point where lowering price further made demand go down.
               | People apparently assumed the higher price tag on a car
               | made it more attractive as a consumer.
        
               | SoftTalker wrote:
               | Probably why Mercedes does not bring their lower-end or
               | lower-optioned car models to North America. They want to
               | maintain their image as a luxury marque so they can
               | command premium prices that their customers are happy to
               | pay.
        
               | ilyt wrote:
               | And https://www.odditycentral.com/news/2-70-supermarket-
               | wine-win...
        
               | sokoloff wrote:
               | Hah. Love it!
               | 
               | > winners that they could buy 1,000 gold stickers to
               | display on their wine labels for just EUR60.
               | 
               | That's not a bad price at all for gold stickers intended
               | for wine bottles. EUR0.06/sticker. I assumed they'd be
               | able to get a good bit higher price.
        
             | bigstrat2003 wrote:
             | > You think they're happier to pay more than to pay less?
             | I'm having a hard time believing that hypothetical.
             | 
             | I believe it. Here's an anecdote which blew my mind when I
             | saw it as a kid, and which illustrates the point.
             | 
             | When I was growing up, we had a guy in our church who made
             | guitars. Beautiful instruments (seriously, look up Petros
             | guitars sometime because they're really beautiful), and
             | played/sounded good to boot. Bruce was charging between
             | $3000 and $6000 at the time depending on specifics, so
             | while pricey they weren't expensive by guitar standards. He
             | told me that he got feedback from customers that they
             | weren't sure whether or not his guitars would be good,
             | because they were priced so reasonably (compared to what
             | one would expect to spend on a custom made guitar).
             | 
             | So Bruce decided to raise his prices, and see what
             | happened. He said his sales went _up_ after raising prices,
             | presumably because the guitars were now at a price point
             | where people went  "yeah this is what a custom handmade
             | instrument should cost" rather than "what's the catch
             | here". Weird, but hard to argue with results. People aren't
             | always rational buyers, as someone else pointed out.
        
         | ilyt wrote:
         | You can just tell them that.
         | 
         | "That is not the type of jobs we usually do, and if we did we'd
         | have to use a lot of time to build competency in the problem
         | and that would've costed you a lot. You'd be better off trying
         | X or Y contractor, that's closer to their wheelhouse"
         | 
         | And as a bonus you'd still be considered for future work that's
         | not that rather than being filed under "those are those super
         | expensive guys we can't afford"
        
           | SoftTalker wrote:
           | A friend of mine who is a plumber said he tells people this
           | all the time, basically "this is a pretty small job and not
           | what we normally do. If I did it, I'd have to take one of my
           | plumbers off of this big job we're in the middle of and
           | charge you what that is costing me, here's the number of a
           | handyman I know who can take care of that for you"
        
             | p3rls wrote:
             | The plumbing company I work for charges $240 per truck for
             | the first hour in labor and $160 after that. For those
             | prices it's definitely worth trying to google it first.
        
         | gumby wrote:
         | Commit to doing a good job, or at least a job that meets what
         | you promise to the customer.
         | 
         | Back when I did support and custom dev, our minimum price was
         | $100K/year (back when $100K was a lot of money). Most of those
         | contracts were fabulously profitable. But once in a while a bug
         | would be reported that took five or even ten person-months to
         | fix, scrambling all our other plans in the process. So what: we
         | didn't charge extra and didn't complain to the customer. Led to
         | crazy levels of customer loyalty.
        
           | creer wrote:
           | Exactly. A high price does not necessarily promise that you
           | have the technical solution ready to go. There is such a
           | thing as building an understanding with the client (even if
           | the contract text itself is more conservative). That leads to
           | a "relationship" with some level of solid grounds for it. As
           | opposed to a common practive of throwing a one-off contract
           | over the wall and merely praying that this will go well.
        
             | ozim wrote:
             | Unfortunately this has to be 2 way street, you might want
             | to do it properly but a lot of customers don't want to
             | invest time.
             | 
             | They want to have stuff done and move on so drop the money
             | and you have to figure out how to do what they want.
        
               | gumby wrote:
               | Those aren't the customers you want.
        
         | Aurornis wrote:
         | When I look for contractors I ask around my network first.
         | 
         | In recent years I've been getting more recommendations for who
         | to _avoid_ than who to hire. There are a lot of contractors and
         | small agencies out there who have gotten good at selling the
         | contract but not so good at delivering satisfactory work.
         | 
         | Often the negative recommendations are from a situation like
         | you described where they pitched a high price or otherwise
         | played games to charge more and more, then delivered a bare-
         | bones result that barely worked or struggled to deliver
         | anything at all. The gap between the expectations of a high-
         | priced contractor and the reality of a disappointing work
         | product leaves a bad taste.
         | 
         | I think a lot of these contractors operate with the mindset
         | that customers will always be available and none of them will
         | talk to each other or seek reference checks, but this approach
         | suffers as the person's reputation permeates their local
         | industry. There are a few contractors in one niche I worked in
         | where nearly everyone knows to avoid them, or at least to put
         | strict oversight and micromanaging in place on their work and
         | billing. At this point their primary audience is new startups
         | where they can milk them for overpriced work until they catch
         | on.
        
           | creer wrote:
           | > have gotten good at selling the contract but not so good at
           | delivering
           | 
           | This has been a problem beyond "recent years". In part
           | because of splitting the sales function from the technical
           | function - which is many agencies as soon as they decide on
           | growth vs specialization.
           | 
           | For clients with a little more time and budget - i.e. a
           | little more forethought in general, it's good reason to hire
           | someone more broadly technically competent or at least aware
           | just to help with the process of hiring more specialized
           | work. At least the first time around it can end up being a
           | recursive problem: if you hire a hiring advisor who has their
           | mind locked on just one way to do things, then you just shot
           | yourself in the foot.
        
           | ilyt wrote:
           | > I think a lot of these contractors operate with the mindset
           | that customers will always be available and none of them will
           | talk to each other or seek reference checks, but this
           | approach suffers as the person's reputation permeates their
           | local industry. There are a few contractors in one niche I
           | worked in where nearly everyone knows to avoid them, or at
           | least to put strict oversight and micromanaging in place on
           | their work and billing. At this point their primary audience
           | is new startups where they can milk them for overpriced work
           | until they catch on.
           | 
           | Well, did they get out of business ? No? Then by captialism
           | the approach is great working strategy...
        
             | creer wrote:
             | Are you arguing that there is some (other) system that
             | solves the issue of over-selling and under-delivering?
             | 
             | More constructively, I don't think anyone argues that there
             | isn't (rudely speaking) a broad supply of fools waiting to
             | be parted from their money. For the purpose of this forum
             | the question is what can the clients (quite possible
             | technically weak which is why they need to hire out) do to
             | improve their odds.
        
             | syndicatedjelly wrote:
             | It's a great working strategy purely due to information
             | asymmetry, not because "markets"
        
               | Nevermark wrote:
               | I don't share the viewpoint you are responding to, but
               | information asymmetry is a significant factor in most
               | transactions.
               | 
               | Rarely is being a more informed customer not a benefit.
               | 
               | Or being a less informed customer not associated with
               | greater difficulty determining which
               | supplier/service/product is the best fit.
        
         | MourYother wrote:
         | Still a win in my book
        
           | bumby wrote:
           | Unhappy customers coupled with high cost to the customer is
           | probably a Pyrrhic win.
        
         | Brian_K_White wrote:
         | No one said to LIE.
         | 
         | It's the opposite.
         | 
         | You quote high to inform them honestly what it would take,
         | rather than deciding for yourself what is really their choice
         | not yours. Your choice is to not take a job if you just don't
         | want to or can't of course, but is not to tell anyone else what
         | they want or what it's worth to them to get it.
         | 
         | So as long as you don't mind doing the job fundamentally, but
         | it's just a matter of resources or time or efficiency etc,
         | (you're not being asked to do something you morally object to,
         | or totally unrelated to the kind of work you want to do, or
         | requires something like living on an oil rig for a year etc...)
         | then you have no excuse to do anything but make your best guess
         | at the honest estimate whatever that is however outlandish you
         | think it is, including whatever no-promises cya terms you think
         | should apply, and just tell them that. "It will be $200k, 4
         | months minimum, and you might get nothing in the end."
         | 
         | And part of that is also giving your best honest advice about
         | what they should actually do, and your reasoning. Some other
         | approach that you think is better, or recommendation how to
         | find some other supplier who could do the approach they wanted
         | "that will require rust and high availability, so you want to
         | look for shops that specialize in rust and high
         | availability...", whatever.
         | 
         | The end result is that they are the ones who decide not to do
         | it rather than you. And if they go for it, well, considering
         | you weren't bullshitting them but giving your honest best info,
         | recommendation, and reasoning, you take it and do the job. If
         | that means spending 2 months just learning a new system or
         | language and throwing away a bunch of experiments just to get
         | started, or hiring someone else to do some part you can't do,
         | so be it. You put all that into the quote, and they said do it,
         | so enjoy your big safe gig for the next while.
        
         | bluedino wrote:
         | Isn't that how the big name consultants work? Price it out like
         | you're getting experts from a famous firm and then send in a
         | green team to do the work?
        
           | ilyt wrote:
           | Or subcontract, which created one of most dystopian term in
           | corporate, "body lending"
        
           | FormerBandmate wrote:
           | It's also how Saul Goodman works
        
             | NullPrefix wrote:
             | Saul Goodman didn't outsource his lawyering. Having a
             | paralegal secretary isn't the same as sending a green team
        
         | jt2190 wrote:
         | > ... maybe it isn't really what you love to do or your
         | expertise...
         | 
         | And that means that you would follow the author's advice and
         | say "no" because you know in advance that it's not your area of
         | expertise and not what you want to do, _and most importantly
         | you haven 't stated any long-term benefits of making this
         | short-term sacrifice_.
         | 
         | Edit: emphasis
        
         | ww520 wrote:
         | Yes. This is a very likely problem. When I evaluate quotes on
         | the other side, I usually weed out the highest and the lowest
         | ones. The highest one is usually some middleman re-contracting
         | out the work adding on his profit. Or someone like you said,
         | just trying to price out the job instead of refusing the job
         | honestly.
        
       | paulsutter wrote:
       | Focus means saying no to almost everything
       | 
       | The hourly rate example is a clear tell. If you're selling your
       | time by the hour you're already doing the wrong work. Consulting
       | = death, and I mean that literally. The months of our career are
       | finite and we should allocate them carefully
        
         | sbayeta wrote:
         | Could you please elaborate on consulting = death?
        
         | garrickvanburen wrote:
         | While I agree the combo is death, billing hourly and consulting
         | are two different things.
         | 
         | Consulting with value--based fees is a fantastic way to
         | deliberately allocate our finite time .
        
         | lmm wrote:
         | Career is a means to an end. Billing hourly I can look after my
         | family, not get too stressed, and focus on what really matters
         | when I'm off the clock. Even if the EV from swinging for the
         | fences would be higher, it's not worth the risk.
        
       | creer wrote:
       | Perhaps there is space for a nuanced:
       | 
       | - "yes"
       | 
       | - "no"
       | 
       | - "this is not our specialty but we'll do it within our current
       | relationship for $BIG_ENOUGH" (and then you know, actually do
       | it.)
       | 
       | - "this is not our specialty but we'll help you hire and manage a
       | specialist so they fit in (for $MODERATE)"
        
       | xyzelement wrote:
       | This is also why you should _get_ multiple quotes for any
       | transaction without an obvious and transparent market. When your
       | roofer quotes you $XK to replace your shingles, that _might_ be
       | what he thinks is a competitive rate in your market, or it
       | _might_ be the  "I am too busy but if they really want to pay
       | that much I'll find a way to make it work" rate.
       | 
       | A guy who's drowning in business and a guy who's sitting idle
       | will likely quote you very different rates. Obviously you should
       | also be conscious of why someone is busier than another, but
       | sometimes it's just a matter of timing, etc.
        
         | NullPrefix wrote:
         | >A guy who's drowning in business and a guy who's sitting idle
         | will likely quote you very different rates
         | 
         | Yes, that's how it works. That's why no one goes out of their
         | way to hire unemployed people
        
           | xyzelement wrote:
           | // That's why no one goes out of their way to hire unemployed
           | people
           | 
           | I don't know why someone would "go out of their way" to do
           | that, but the numbers take care of it. For example, if I post
           | a job at $XXXK per year, if XXX < FAANG salary, I would
           | expect nobody from FAANG to apply, but I might get some "laid
           | off from FAANG" candidates.
        
       | garrickvanburen wrote:
       | A decade+ later lots of people (potential customers, investors)
       | also prefer not say "no".
       | 
       | In my work with startup founders, I regularly say, "people say
       | 'no' in a lot of ways, many are very subtle. But when they say
       | 'yes' it's clear and obvious."
        
       | Tade0 wrote:
       | I never give a definite answer before I'm at least somewhat
       | familiar with the problem at hand and their deadlines - I'm not
       | able to tell from this article alone if the author did that.
       | 
       | Anyway this approach is profitable but comes with two downsides:
       | 
       | -You risk getting stuck with a project that was much larger than
       | you anticipated.
       | 
       | -Eventually you find that your business is not what you
       | originally envisioned.
       | 
       | I used to work for a company that wanted to get into the Big Data
       | space back when that was a fashionable buzzword.
       | 
       | I went to an interview there a couple of years after parting ways
       | only to discover that while they still heavily advertised big
       | data, deep learning and whatnot, their main money maker was some
       | pretty standard DevOps.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | b8 wrote:
       | As I learned from my mom, "maybe, I'll think about it".
        
       | Klsimek wrote:
       | See also Weinberg's "Orange Juice Test" from "Secrets of
       | Consulting"
       | 
       | https://lalgudi.medium.com/orange-juice-test-will-you-pass-i...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-10-01 23:01 UTC)