[HN Gopher] Simple math moves the needle
___________________________________________________________________
Simple math moves the needle
Author : digital55
Score : 49 points
Date : 2023-09-29 15:05 UTC (2 days ago)
(HTM) web link (www.quantamagazine.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.quantamagazine.org)
| fiforpg wrote:
| Kakeya problem is a beautiful question, and Besicovitch's
| construction has been really useful in harmonic analysis
| (Fefferman's _The multiplier problem for the ball_ is a classic
| example). Still, in the eyes of wider public it must appear
| uncanny, requiring the Amazon truck analogies, etc.
|
| Reminds me of Vladimir Arnold's comment on the state of modern
| number theory (presumably talking about density of primes in
| arithmetic progressions, he says): why would you even _want_ to
| add primes, they were born to be multiplied?
| gumby wrote:
| > why would you even want to add primes, they were born to be
| multiplied?
|
| I actually laughed out loud at this. For real! So great.
| ducttapecrown wrote:
| Why is the Kakeya problem so popular?
| fiforpg wrote:
| If I understand correctly, the initial appeal goes back to the
| early days of measure theory.
|
| Say, a 2-dimensional set is cut parallel to y-axis, and the
| cuts all have length 1. If the x-coordinates of the cuts
| themselves have length 1, you know that the 2-dimensional set
| must be "large". This is because you can integrate the cut
| length, and tell that it has area 1. (Think of a 1x1 square for
| an illustration).
|
| In Kakeya's problem, the cuts still have length 1, but are no
| longer parallel to any one axis. Besicovitch's construction
| shows, Kakeya set can have very small area, yet contain cuts of
| length 1 in many directions. This situation is quite different.
|
| This counterexample turned out to be useful in other areas of
| pure math, some discussed in the wiki entry for Kakeya problem.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-10-01 23:01 UTC)