[HN Gopher] How did Qualcomm snatch defeat from the jaws of vict...
___________________________________________________________________
How did Qualcomm snatch defeat from the jaws of victory with their
Oryon SoC?
Author : Tuldok
Score : 37 points
Date : 2023-09-29 19:49 UTC (3 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (semiaccurate.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (semiaccurate.com)
| distract8901 wrote:
| This is one of the dumbest things I've ever seen.
|
| To sum up:
|
| - Qualcomm mandated that manufacturers use their power supply
| chips with their processor
|
| - these power supply chips are _wildly_ inappropriate for
| laptops, requiring 4-6 in parallel when a single properly spec 'd
| chip would work
|
| - said chips are designed for space-constrained phones, and are
| so small they require a different type of PCB
|
| - those PCBs can't handle the power and need to double the layer
| count
|
| - cost of PCBs becomes absolutely ludicrous at this scale
|
| - Qualcomm refuses to allow manufacturers to use a more
| appropriate power supply
|
| - manufacturers literally cannot afford the design and stopped
| using Qualcomm
|
| - Qualcomm is now paying manufacturers to use their chipset, and
| are losing money in the deal
|
| I don't even know how to express what an absolutely terrible idea
| this is. The Qualcomm chips are not fit for purpose, _at all_.
| Totally inappropriate for the application. No engineer in their
| right mind would go for this.
|
| Qualcomm is mandating that manufacturers eat a _fuckton_ of cost
| in raw materials, drastically reduce the efficiency and battery
| life of their product, and charge way more than the market would
| pay for an underpowered, overheating laptop with a pitiful
| battery life. For... Reasons?
|
| It makes no sense at all. No one is going to use this chipset. If
| any devices _do_ make it to market, their terrible performance
| will absolutely trash Qualcomm 's reputation in this space and
| consumers won't buy them in the future.
|
| Absolutely insane
| amluto wrote:
| This all sounds so inept on Qualcomm's part that I have trouble
| believing the explanation.
|
| Qualcomm is trying to make money on the whole shebang, not on the
| PMICs. They're trying to sell, for lack of a better word, a
| system on multiple chips. Intel and AMD do this too (see their
| chipsets, for example). When someone makes a laptop, the the CPU
| vendor accounts for some of the BOM cost, and that's their
| revenue. The manufacturer is willing to pay some total BOM cost
| at a given performance point, and they'll buy more units at a
| lower total. So the CPU vendor wants the total to be as low as
| possible and their portion of it to be as high as possible.
| Except to the extent that supplying PMICs (if done competently)
| diverts more of the BOM to them without increasing the total,
| they don't really care whose PMICs are used in the grand scheme
| of things. And they certainly wouldn't torpedo the entire product
| launch over PMICs.
|
| I bet this is actually just overconfidence in their product. They
| designed around their proprietary PMIC, and that design is
| _important_ : a CPU draws _variable_ amounts of power, and the
| system will not work if the power and voltages are wrong. For
| bonus points, the CPU would much rather operate at lower power
| (skip clocks or whatever) than simply crash if an intensive
| workload starts and the battery plus whatever power supply is
| connected can't keep up. [0]. So I bet they tried to get all this
| right, they designed around their PMICs, they didn't realize the
| chip format was inappropriate, and they can't fix it in time for
| market. Oops.
|
| Qualcomm has never done the laptop thing for real before. Intel,
| AMD, and Apple have.
|
| [0] Anyone remember Apple's issues here?
| muppetman wrote:
| That was a very hard article to read (more on this later)
| RicoElectrico wrote:
| Honestly was ever Qualcomm not a master of proprietary cash
| grabs? After all, even in 90s they had their own standards as
| opposed to GSM. It is in their DNA.
|
| We could have been better off had any of the more "universal"
| chip companies won the Android SoC race (like TI, Freescale and
| so on)
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-09-29 23:01 UTC)