[HN Gopher] A mystery species was discovered in trafficked pango...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       A mystery species was discovered in trafficked pangolin scales
        
       Author : benbreen
       Score  : 19 points
       Date   : 2023-09-26 04:27 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nytimes.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nytimes.com)
        
       | darth_avocado wrote:
       | It's so strange to me that capturing wild animals is the only way
       | to go about it. If demand is so high, why are there no farms
       | already? Instead of decimating the population, they'd help with
       | conservation.
        
         | farnsworth wrote:
         | You can't just put wild animals behind a fence and expect them
         | to live happily. Typically animals have had to be domesticated
         | through generations of breeding before they can live in those
         | conditions, and for certain animals, that just doesn't work for
         | some reason. I think I read that the ancestor of the cow was
         | genetically suited for domestication, but buffaloes are not.
         | 
         | This site says that pangolins haven't survived in captivity
         | https://www.ifaw.org/journal/faq-
         | pangolins#:~:text=Pangolins....
         | 
         | I'd compare this to the way that for some reason we just
         | haven't figured out how to farm truffles. Even though they're
         | extremely valuable, we can only find them growing wild.
        
           | LeifCarrotson wrote:
           | You may have read that in "Guns, Germs, and Steel" by
           | Diamond, which is pop science but highly recommended.
           | 
           | There's an additional distinction between animals that can be
           | domesticated (grown on a farm) and tamed (born in the wild,
           | brought into zoos).
           | 
           | To be domesticated, an animal must have several compatible
           | attributes:
           | 
           | 1. Size - It's just not worth it to try to domesticate mice.
           | It's barely worth it to domesticate rabbits. Today, we might
           | domesticate pangolins, rabbits, rats, etc. because cuteness,
           | charisma, or rare medical utility is now valuable enough to
           | have someone specialize in, but you're not going to get the
           | benefits of millenia of breeding the best sheep for
           | domestication.
           | 
           | 2. Temperament - An animal must be docile, able to be calm in
           | reasonably close proximity to humans. Typically this means
           | herding or flocking social herbivores, and not flighty,
           | vicious ones.
           | 
           | 3. Reproductive rate - If it's going to take multiple
           | generations of farmers to grow one generation of Galapagos
           | tortoises or elephants to maturity, you're not likely to have
           | a self-sustaining farm. A breeding program over centuries
           | becomes a civilization-level project, not a personal project.
           | 
           | 4. Diet - Again, today we could hypothetically feed termite
           | larvae to pangolins at comparatively great expense. But if
           | you want millenia of breeding to improve your domestication
           | progress, they're basically going to have to be willing to
           | eat stuff that's easy to provide and that doesn't compete
           | with human diets, such as grass.
           | 
           | Buffalo are not suited to domestication because they fail
           | criteria #2, unlike cows. Diamond argues that this failure is
           | part of why the Europeans colonized the Americas rather than
           | the other way around - Eurasia had horses, cows, sheep,
           | goats, pigs, wheat, barley, rice, and more, the Americas had
           | buffalo, llamas, deer, beans, and maize (the latter two being
           | great grains in calories per acre, but not half as good as
           | modern corn, and not easy to farm without draft animals).
        
             | pvaldes wrote:
             | > It's just not worth it to try to domesticate mice.
             | 
             | We did it, and it was very profitable. Mice (and hamsters)
             | are small animals that are really domesticated, selected
             | and breed at a cosmopolitan level. Fishes are domesticated
             | also. We can't domesticate too much big ones (Bigger than a
             | killer whale is really difficult) but small ones, yes. We
             | do it all the time.
             | 
             | An animal don't need to be docile or calm to be breed in
             | captivity. We domesticated bulls and selected them on
             | purpose to be vicious. Tamed is not the same thing as
             | domesticated.
        
           | rob74 wrote:
           | Wikipedia
           | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangolin#Conservation) has
           | more details:
           | 
           | > _Many attempts have been made to breed pangolins in
           | captivity, but due to their reliance on wide-ranging habitats
           | and very particular diets, these attempts are often
           | unsuccessful. Pangolins have significantly decreased immune
           | responses due to a genetic dysfunction, making them extremely
           | fragile. They are susceptible to diseases such as pneumonia
           | and the development of ulcers in captivity, complications
           | that can lead to an early death. In addition, pangolins
           | rescued from illegal trade often have a higher chance of
           | being infected with parasites such as intestinal worms,
           | further lessening their chance for rehabilitation and
           | reintroduction to the wild._
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | _hypx wrote:
       | https://archive.ph/fHdzW
        
       | ComputerGuru wrote:
       | Interesting article. I wouldn't want to place bets on the long-
       | term outlook of this M Mysteria given that the entire family is
       | so endangered.
       | 
       | The difficulties in distinguishing M Mysteria from other _Manis_
       | species just stresses the folly that is categorization. Yes, it
       | has genetic differences from previously seen family members  /
       | "known" species. But is that enough to make it a species all to
       | its own? For a specimen that hasn't been seen in person, on what
       | basis are we declaring it a separate species? Surely a genetic
       | divergence isn't enough (article says you can't tell just by
       | comparing the scales) - you'd have to study the specimens
       | themselves, their behavior, see if they can breed, etc.
        
         | jononomo wrote:
         | > Using their genomes, the researchers were able to estimate
         | that the armored animals diverged from other pangolin species
         | "over five million years ago," said Hua-Rong Zhang, a
         | conservation geneticist at Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden in
         | Hong Kong and an author of the paper.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-09-27 23:02 UTC)