[HN Gopher] India fails to re-establish communication with its M...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       India fails to re-establish communication with its Moon probe
        
       Author : thunderbong
       Score  : 143 points
       Date   : 2023-09-23 14:15 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (efe.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (efe.com)
        
       | r721 wrote:
       | Kind of off-topic: first time I see a efe.com link, looked it up
       | in Wikipedia and surprisingly it's "the world's fourth largest
       | wire service after the Associated Press, Reuters, and Agence
       | France-Presse ... created in 1939"
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EFE
       | 
       | Just four posts were submitted to HN:
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=efe.com
        
         | pakyr wrote:
         | > the major multimedia news agency in the Spanish language
         | 
         | That's probably why.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | swarnie wrote:
         | Seems about right, two English speaking, one French, one
         | Spanish.
         | 
         | The legacy of empire.
        
       | rammer wrote:
       | Such a loaded headline, almost as though the writers are happy
       | that India failed. When the truth is the mission was only
       | designed to be for the lunar day and not for the lunar night.
       | 
       | Reeks of jealousy
        
         | AbrahamParangi wrote:
         | Why would the authors have any kind of feelings about India
         | succeeding or failing?
        
         | tyre wrote:
         | India was hoping that the probe could hibernate through the
         | night and operate again in the day.
         | 
         | The headline accurately reflects that they're trying to
         | communicate with it and failing.
        
       | mehulagrawal wrote:
       | If I understand correctly, this was the expected and most likely
       | outcome. The planned lifespan of the lander and rover was only 14
       | days.
        
         | DylanSp wrote:
         | Yep, everyone knew that making it through the lunar night was
         | pretty unlikely. A successful landing was always the main goal.
        
         | blackoil wrote:
         | Yes, probability of it surviving 14 days in Lunar Night at
         | -200C was extremely low. India doesn't have Radioisotope
         | batteries that work at this temp. It will also increase the
         | payload size and will require larger launch infra. Not to
         | mention all the material and chemical challenges faced at these
         | temp.
        
           | sidewndr46 wrote:
           | That seems like an obvious opportunity for diplomatic and
           | scientific outreach and partnership. Did India want this
           | project to be entirely homegrown?
        
             | gerdesj wrote:
             | "Did India want this project to be entirely homegrown?"
             | 
             | I suspect so and I also think that if you are going to test
             | your skills, then being realistic in the first place is
             | good idea. The mission was always sold as unlikely to
             | survive the night but that would be a nice to have if it
             | did.
             | 
             | For me the mission seems to have worked rather well and
             | performed exactly as billed.
        
       | dkqmduems wrote:
       | Blame Canada.
        
       | throwbadubadu wrote:
       | "However, there was uncertainty about the possibility of these to
       | resume functioning after facing extremely low temperatures of the
       | lunar night which can go as low as -200 degrees Celsius.
       | 
       | Moreover, its battery needed to remain at a certain level to be
       | able to recharge again with the solar dawn."
       | 
       | Naive guy would think that alone can and would be extensively
       | tested on earth?
        
         | brushinator wrote:
         | And yet the lunar lander and the astronauts on the moon did
         | just fine. Did the lunar lander and the body suits have
         | heaters?
        
           | kjkjadksj wrote:
           | They did, but they also left before the lunar night.
        
             | evgen wrote:
             | The humans inside the suits and lander also provided some
             | useful heat. For most spacecraft, once you put humans into
             | them the problem changes from conserving heat to getting
             | rid of it.
        
             | brushinator wrote:
             | Ok so at 120 degrees C got it
        
               | NamTaf wrote:
               | Kinda crazy what effect different albedos have, isn't it?
               | :)
        
           | seabass-labrax wrote:
           | If you haven't already, I would highly recommend watching
           | 'Apollo 13'[1]. On a technical basis it is really accurate to
           | the real-life events. The astronauts having to shut down the
           | lunar lander's (LEM) heating system comes into the story
           | about half way through. It's one of my all-time favourite
           | films!
           | 
           | [1]: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112384/
        
             | to11mtm wrote:
             | Or, if you want to be a purist, there's this. [0](thank you
             | whoever submitted this to HN a while back!)
             | 
             | [0] - https://apolloinrealtime.org/13/
        
               | seabass-labrax wrote:
               | Wow, that's amazing. I'm know what I'm going to be doing
               | on Sunday!
        
         | toast0 wrote:
         | > Naive guy would think that alone can and would be extensively
         | tested on earth?
         | 
         | The article says the probe achieved its objectives in the first
         | active period. This attempted wakeup was for bonus time.
        
           | NortySpock wrote:
           | And it would have been designed to achieve all those
           | objectives in the 14-day lunar sunshine period.
           | 
           | You could design a car that runs for a billion miles, but no-
           | one could afford it. You pick a reasonable lifespan for a
           | project and target your specifications around that.
        
             | pixl97 wrote:
             | Ya, and the Indian mission was already one of the lowest
             | budget successful missions there has been. The US is one of
             | the few countries that can spend billions on missions where
             | the lander may last months/years longer than expected.
        
         | warkdarrior wrote:
         | [flagged]
        
           | moralestapia wrote:
           | This is a troll post, right?
        
         | flashgordon wrote:
         | We probably found it cheaper to build it, send it, test it than
         | build a lab to get to -200degc :)
        
           | Halfwhit wrote:
           | I too like to live dangerously and test in production
        
       | waffletower wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
         | HexDecOctBin wrote:
         | Hopefully, the Canadian moon rover doesn't shelter and sponsor
         | terrorist-gangster nexuses for short term political gains.
         | 
         | Oh wait, there is no Canadian moon rover!
        
           | waffletower wrote:
           | We are laughing, but not at your misplaced competitive jibe,
           | but at you for stooping even lower by saying it.
        
             | HexDecOctBin wrote:
             | What makes you think that the gangsters who extort and
             | terrorise Indo-Canadians today will not start doing the
             | same to white Canadians tomorrow? You have no idea what
             | kind of monster your politicians have raised in your
             | backyard; and seeing you domestic politics now, it might
             | already be too late to control it.
             | 
             | But feel free to keep laughing, it's good for the health.
        
               | RugnirViking wrote:
               | I worked with a few sikh guys at one of my old jobs.
               | Lovely chaps.
               | 
               | I'd like for you to meditate long and hard about exactly
               | why them wanting their own homeland is so unacceptable to
               | an india where indian nationalists (not a majority) did
               | bombings and assasainations when seeking independance
               | from the raj.
               | 
               | such things were unacceptable then and are unacceptable
               | now. But like back then, it would be wrong to punish the
               | rest of the population because of actions of so few, or
               | to reject outright the idea of independance
        
         | waffletower wrote:
         | https://www.economist.com/leaders/2023/09/20/if-india-ordere...
        
         | waffletower wrote:
         | I have some points to spare to see how far you will go to
         | suppress alleged criminality of the Indian government. Censor
         | away and blight your soul some more.
        
       | m348e912 wrote:
       | It's strange to me that the only footage released has been low
       | res/low frame rate. It seems like a significant oversight to
       | neglect to include cameras that can take, store, and transmit
       | high quality video. Anyone have any links to footage I might have
       | missed?
        
       | petre wrote:
       | At least they've sucessfully got a probe onto the Moon, as
       | opposed to Russia who poisoned their lead scientist with
       | _mushrooms_ after it failed to do so.
        
         | nphard85 wrote:
         | Interesting. Is there a source for this claim?
        
       | publicola1990 wrote:
       | There has been other probes that continued to operate over
       | multiple lunar cycles, how did they manage?
        
         | dgrin91 wrote:
         | Few factors -
         | 
         | 1. Design goals. The program had a budget, and with that budget
         | their goal was a 14 day target. Anything extra is icing on the
         | cake. They could have used an RTG to ensure long term survival,
         | but it would have exploded their budget.
         | 
         | 2. If I remember correctly the probe is in the south pole of
         | the moon. Most probes are closer to the equator. The poles get
         | colder and I think in some circumstances have more night time
         | 
         | 3. Experience. This is their first successful moon probe. Now
         | they understand the parameters better, so maybe next one will
         | do better?
        
         | thefurdrake wrote:
         | JPL and whoever's behind engineering for the ESA have decades
         | of experience on the Indian space program.
         | 
         | I believe the approach is to shut down all nonessentials and
         | run a heater to keep the battery above failure level during the
         | night. This sounds simple but I'm pretty sure it's an absolute
         | nightmare to design autonomous systems for, especially when
         | you've only encountered those situations theoretically or in a
         | controlled lab environment.
         | 
         | Space is hard. It hates us. It hates life. It hates any form of
         | order and will actively attempt to destroy it. Trying to make
         | things that survive in space is Difficult. It would have been
         | easy to go "Lol india amirite", but the fact is, this is one of
         | the hardest things humanity can do.
        
           | vc8f6vVV wrote:
           | > It hates any form of order and will actively attempt to
           | destroy it.
           | 
           | If you are talking about ever increasing entropy, it applies
           | to any environment. But keep in mind that the Moon itself is
           | a manifestation of order. If it hadn't been the case we would
           | have been observing a cloud of dust and gas where our Solar
           | system is.
        
           | justsomehnguy wrote:
           | > This sounds simple
           | 
           | Especially for someone who never experienced anything lower
           | than -5degC. Most cars wouldn't even start at -20degC if not
           | equipped with a more powerful generator and battery from the
           | factory. This is measly 20deg difference.
        
             | thefurdrake wrote:
             | It got below 0F a couple years ago and my garage door
             | wouldn't open.
             | 
             | -200C in a vacuum is an entirely-different engineering
             | paradigm as I understand it. Materials just don't behave
             | the way we expect at regular temp/pressure.
        
               | suckitsam wrote:
               | There was a whole writeup (on here, IIRC) about the
               | engineering behind the only (or one of less than a
               | handful) types of planes that can transit Antarctica
               | during the cold, dark months.
               | 
               | The fuel freezes, the oil freezes, the rubber in the
               | tires and gaskets becomes brittle, and basically nothing
               | normal works. I recall it being similar-but-different to
               | the SR71 modifications, where the parts are loose and
               | continuously leaks fluids because the materials all
               | change shapes so much in the environment they're designed
               | for. And of course it all has to return to the initial
               | state for (a safe) landing.
        
               | selectodude wrote:
               | The Concorde would get something like a foot longer at
               | speed due to the expansion of the fuselage.
        
               | paganel wrote:
               | Stupid question, and maybe I should have web searched for
               | it, but why did the fuselage expend? Something to do with
               | the heat generated by the high speed and hence by the
               | high friction?
        
             | vc8f6vVV wrote:
             | Most modern cars will happily start at -20degC and many
             | will start at -30degC without any special additions (don't
             | ask me how I know, you just need to know what you are
             | doing). Of course it's not -200degC, but one thing to
             | remember is that there is no temperature in the vacuum. The
             | temperature of the Lunar surface is not it. An object
             | without heating can easily reach lower temperatures there,
             | yet it may not be that hard to keep that object warm as
             | e.g. somewhere in the Arctic as there is no conductivity,
             | only the radiation heat transfer.
        
             | stouset wrote:
             | I made the mistake of going splitboarding in the
             | backcountry a few years back in -20degC with -40degC
             | windchill.
             | 
             | Going up the mountain was surprisingly fine. I even had
             | taken off both my jackets and was just wearing thermals as
             | the heat I was generating working to go uphill was enough
             | to keep me comfortable.
             | 
             | Unfortunately when we reached the top, we _also_ ended up
             | directly in the wind with no available cover. Within the
             | ten minutes it took to put my jackets back on and
             | transition to go downhill, I was nearly hypothermic. I
             | couldn't even operate my fingers enough to bring the idiot-
             | proof magnetic clasp on my helmet together. The whole group
             | was on the verge of panic to get off the top of that ridge.
             | If we'd stayed there five more minutes, I'm not confident
             | we would have made it back home that day.
             | 
             | I can't fully express how obscenely, unconscionably, and
             | incomparably cold that was. I have never felt anything like
             | it and I hope never to again.
        
         | dotnet00 wrote:
         | By having some source of heat, for example, while the Chinese
         | rover from a few years ago was solar powered, it had a
         | radioisotope heater which used the heat produced by some
         | plutonium-238 to keep the electronics warm enough to survive
         | the night.
        
         | seatac76 wrote:
         | They use RTGs[1] as the power and heat source, I think CY3 was
         | just solar powered and did not have thermal protection you get
         | from RTGs for electronics.
         | 
         | [1]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioisotope_thermoelectric_
         | ...
        
           | shauryamanu wrote:
           | They are still working on RTGs.
           | https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/isro-barc-
           | join-...
           | 
           | Above was paywalled, check this https://www.reddit.com/r/ISRO
           | /comments/151j6zw/isro_barc_joi...
        
         | pixl97 wrote:
         | By spending massive amounts of money.
        
           | CommanderData wrote:
           | [flagged]
        
             | 1024core wrote:
             | [flagged]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-09-23 23:01 UTC)