[HN Gopher] What can medicine do for people with genes for ALS?
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       What can medicine do for people with genes for ALS?
        
       Author : swid
       Score  : 61 points
       Date   : 2023-09-21 14:14 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.statnews.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.statnews.com)
        
       | jddj wrote:
       | I lost a parent to ALS.
       | 
       | Morbidly, I guess for me it might be a race between that and the
       | cancers that killed off the other side of the family.
       | 
       | I don't really care to get checked for the gene, but I do have a
       | general idea of what needs to happen once the speech starts to
       | go.
        
         | A_D_E_P_T wrote:
         | > Morbidly, I guess for me it might be a race between that and
         | the cancers that killed off the other side of the family.
         | 
         | <=10% of ALS is inherited. And even if you carry a gene which
         | makes you more susceptible to ALS, the risk seems to cap out at
         | ~50%. So, at worst, it's a coin flip.
         | 
         | So. It's not an inevitability -- not certain doom. It's a roll
         | of the dice, with the odds in your favor.
        
           | jddj wrote:
           | That's true, and if I were a gambling man I'd probably back
           | the various cancers in that competition anyway, but still
           | these things have a way of changing your outlook in subtle
           | ways.
           | 
           | That coin-flip-at-worst still probably gives one a better
           | than evens chance of falling on the side of the average life
           | expectancy where folks don't live to enjoy a long healthy
           | retirement, for example.
           | 
           | You might, though, so you can't burn it all either.
           | 
           | There's also some added complexity that comes along for the
           | ride when choosing to have children or not, saddled with a
           | family history of nasty, fairly early onset baggage.
           | 
           | Another commenter said that embryo selection can help in that
           | regard, which is an interesting angle that I hadn't
           | considered.
        
           | asveikau wrote:
           | The article says that is true for most of the mutations
           | causing ALS, but the specific mutation that the subject of
           | the story has is more of an inevitability than the other,
           | more common ones.
        
         | ToddWBurgess wrote:
         | Lost my mother to ALS. She was a nurse so she made a point to
         | ask if there was a chance she passed it onto her kids and was
         | assured no we are fine. It is a small consolation considering
         | all she had to endure.
         | 
         | ALS is a horrible way to exit this earth. It is a death I would
         | wish on no one
        
         | bloomingeek wrote:
         | Sorry to hear. My aunt died of ALS, so my sister and I
         | scheduled some tests with a neurologist for some peace of mind.
        
       | boxfire wrote:
       | Damn. One of the most powerful experiences of my life was working
       | for someone with ALS. They could only communicate via moving and
       | blinking their eyes slightly as I cued them. This person pivoted
       | their career and was actively researching the disease locking
       | them into their brain.
       | 
       | One day they played a trick on me (I was basically a human auto
       | complete as I took some graduate courses in their field and I was
       | able to help finish the proposal they were writing). They made a
       | joke in the word document. It made me laugh, and as I was looking
       | in their eye I could see the joy that made. I cried so much that
       | night.
       | 
       | It really really gets to me. Every time I saw a new eye tracker
       | device or otherwise I would email their spouse. I fuckin hate
       | that disease, but I'm amazed at the human spirit I've seen it
       | reveal.
        
         | jahnu wrote:
         | It's extremely cruel but as you saw people can be resilient.
         | The artist TransFatty made a very moving, sad, brilliant, and
         | even funny documentary about his experience being diagnosed
         | with ALS.
         | 
         | https://m.imdb.com/title/tt4221762/
        
         | busterarm wrote:
         | My mom was a nurse who spent a significant portion of her
         | career caring for people with neurodegenerative disorders. It's
         | a very difficult thing to be in proximity of.
         | 
         | I remember one specific patient that was a child and his
         | parents were going to extreme lengths to have him live like a
         | normal kid. I forget the specific disease but for the last few
         | years of his life he had no functioning nervous system and was
         | kept alive by machines until the parents could bring themselves
         | to let him go.
         | 
         | I think about these situations a lot and yeah -- it brings out
         | a range of strong emotions.
        
       | armadsen wrote:
       | Dominantly inherited Alzheimer's runs in my wife's family and
       | they've faced some similar experiences to those described in the
       | article. Alzheimer's specialists treating her dad initially
       | dismissed the risk of his kids getting it. The vast majority of
       | AD patients don't have any specific known genetic predisposition
       | for it, and among those that do have genetic risk, the most
       | common is APOE mutations where your risk is increased, but it's
       | by no means a sure thing you'll get the disease. The forms that
       | are dominantly inherited and ~guarantee you'll get the disease
       | are maybe 1% of total cases.
       | 
       | For that reason, even some Alzheimer's doctors seem inclined to
       | treat people as if the dominantly inherited forms aren't worth
       | worrying about until symptoms start. It took quite a bit of
       | pushback and multiple doctors to find one that would refer him to
       | be tested for a EOFAD (early onset familial Alzheimer's disease)
       | causing gene. And of course, just as anyone in his family could
       | have told you, he came back positive for a known pathogenic
       | mutation with ~100% penetrance.
       | 
       | His kids, all youngish adults, are now in the process of deciding
       | whether to get tested. But if they come back positive -- outside
       | some clinical trials going on with the new antibody drugs
       | (Lecanemab, Donanemab) -- there's nothing to be done other than
       | wait to get it in your 40s or 50s, decline and die. It's a
       | terrible, terrible position to be in.
        
       | teeray wrote:
       | I don't want this to come off as "oh, well did you just try gene
       | therapy?" but, I am genuinely curious what prevents us from
       | trying to edit out these problematic mutations under a "right to
       | try" basis.
        
       | jmyeet wrote:
       | I see several issues:
       | 
       | 1. It's just more evidence (as if we needed it) that individual
       | health insurance is a fumdamentally flawed system and we should
       | absolutely not base policy decisions on that terrible premise;
       | 
       | 2. There is a danger on physicians attributing symptoms to a
       | genetic illness. Honestly, I think this might even be a cause of
       | medial misogyny (which is real and well-studied) where doctors
       | simply blame symptoms from woman patients on their reproductive
       | system.
       | 
       | 3. Screening fetuses for possible abortion is another issue. Of
       | course this should only be done with parental consent but there's
       | still a eugenics conversation to be had. I'm all in favor of not
       | subjecting people to a debilitating illness if you don't have to.
        
         | SoftTalker wrote:
         | > Screening fetuses for possible abortion
         | 
         | I don't think we go there. Why is it right to deny someone a
         | life just because it's likely to be shorter than average?
        
           | jmyeet wrote:
           | Why is it right to give someone a lifelong preventable
           | debilitating disease that will drastically reduce the length
           | and quality of their life?
        
       | afpx wrote:
       | There's an association between ALS and programmers:
       | 
       | See 10.1093/AJE/KWI343
       | 
       | https://sci-hub.se/10.1093/AJE/KWI343
        
       | incongruity wrote:
       | We have familial ALS in our family. I lost my grandfather, two
       | aunts, and uncle and a number of more distantly related family
       | members to this disease.
       | 
       | Thank you for posting this article - I'm lucky - my dad tested
       | negative for the gene that has afflicted our loved ones - but I
       | feel so guilty vs. all of my cousins who still have to face these
       | risks.
       | 
       | We have the power to enable them and others like them to make
       | their own decisions, to have even a slim bit of hope (or even a
       | slim bit of uncertainty) for the first time since we've
       | recognized that familial ALS was a thing. I can't overstate how
       | big of a deal that is. Agency, even if risky, is so much better
       | than the fear and powerlessness of waiting for the inevitable.
        
       | carbocation wrote:
       | This is an important story and my critique is mundane but I wish
       | the headline were more accurate. You don't have "genetic
       | [disease]" unless you have "[disease]", and I think that STAT
       | News should get that right.
       | 
       | These individuals have what we think is the genetic risk factor
       | for ALS. ALS is probably a complex disease, in which case a
       | single monogenic variant will not, alone, be enough to explain
       | risk, timing of onset, etc.
        
         | oidar wrote:
         | I really want to like stat news, but it seems like much of
         | their journalism style has been informed by celebrity rags. It
         | makes it less trustworthy to me.
        
         | armadsen wrote:
         | I disagree with you. If the risk is 100% as it is with some
         | ALS-causing gene mutations, as well as one that runs in my (in-
         | law) family, it's does indeed alone explain risk. At least for
         | the disease in my family, timing of onset is relatively
         | consistent too (+/- 5 years or something). And maybe more
         | importantly, the pathology is such that internal damage is
         | happening for years, probably decades, before the first outward
         | symptoms appear. If "family member noticed a tiny little
         | problem that maybe was nothing, maybe the first symptom of the
         | disease, but was concerned enough to go to the doctor" is the
         | criteria for diagnosing the disease, and starting treatment,
         | that's _way_ , _way_ more subjective and silly than looking for
         | a specific gene mutation that causes the underlying pathology.
        
         | beebmam wrote:
         | Epigenetics might play a role, too, like it usually does.
        
         | A_D_E_P_T wrote:
         | Truth is that we don't even know what [disease] is.
         | 
         | ALS could be several etiologically distinct diseases that
         | manifest similarly. And there are indications of this in the
         | fact that certain drugs -- like the recently approved Tofersen
         | -- have some effect on a subset of ALS cases but have no effect
         | on others.
         | 
         | On that note, even Tofersen is of very questionable efficacy:
         | https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/22/fda-advisors-vote-against-ef...
         | 
         | I'm usually hugely sympathetic to "Right to Try" cases. But, in
         | the article, you've got people without the disease in question
         | (whatever it is) seeking the right to try drugs that are of
         | very questionable efficacy to begin with. I say let them have
         | it, for whatever good (or harm) it'll do. People can decide for
         | themselves whether the side effects they might experience are
         | worth the amelioration of fear and glimmer of hope they
         | receive.
        
           | NoMoreNicksLeft wrote:
           | I know very little about ALS, other than I'm aware that it
           | exists and is a nervous system disease. How quick is the
           | onset once someone does develop it? Is it a gradual decline,
           | a rapid decline, or do they just wake up one morning and
           | can't move (falls off a cliff)?
           | 
           | "Right to try" might be worthless in the last case. (Unless
           | there's reason to believe that it's reversible with some as-
           | of-yet uninvented treatment.)
        
             | SoftTalker wrote:
             | It varies. Stephen Hawking lived with it for many years.
             | For most people, 2-5 years of steady decline is normal
             | between diagnosis and death. In some people it progresses
             | more rapidly, in others much more slowly. I don't think we
             | really know why.
        
           | margalabargala wrote:
           | > in the article, you've got people without the disease in
           | question (whatever it is)
           | 
           | Honestly my takeaway from the article, and from a lot of the
           | comments here, is that we should be (but aren't) updating our
           | definition of "disease" for some diseases as our
           | understanding grows.
           | 
           | If you have partially blocked arteries, you're not _actively_
           | suffering from heart disease, but it 's normal to give that
           | person drugs and advise lifestyle changes as soon as that's
           | detected. You don't wait for them to have a heart attack.
           | 
           | Of course, the cause and effect is much better understood
           | with heart attacks and isn't at all clear with ALS. But the
           | fact that ALS doctors were bewildered that someone might want
           | to take prophylactic measures says to me that they have some
           | blinders on.
           | 
           | Imagine getting some tests done, learning your coronary
           | arteries are 60% blocked and your LDL levels are at the 98th
           | percentile, and having a cardiologist tell you "Don't think
           | about it for now, come back once your heart stops beating".
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | klipt wrote:
           | > ALS could be several etiologically distinct diseases that
           | manifest similarly.
           | 
           | What's the common factor - are they all autoimmune diseases?
           | 
           | Would the "inverse vaccine" approach discussed here recently
           | help?
        
             | A_D_E_P_T wrote:
             | It's unclear whether or not ALS (any form) is an autoimmune
             | disease.
             | 
             | Autoimmune diseases are typically associated with
             | autoantibody production. These are in evidence in (-- at
             | least some forms of --) ALS, but in an unusual way that
             | makes their role highly uncertain. They are potentially
             | beneficial. See: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25344935/
        
         | btilly wrote:
         | The article is about those with the genetic risk struggling to
         | get classified and treated as having the disease.
         | 
         | Calling it "genetic ALS" seems like a fair compromise. They
         | didn't say "with ALS". They said "with genetic ALS". Which
         | seems like a reasonable shorthand for, "with the genetics that
         | evidence shows will lead to ALS".
        
         | swid wrote:
         | That's the title I shorted it to and my mistake, the STAT title
         | actually says "They carry a gene for ALS but aren't sick."
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | ferfumarma wrote:
         | You are simply wrong.
         | 
         | The mutations described in this article are a sufficient
         | condition to develop ALS, period.
         | 
         | That means that if you live long enough, you _will_ get ALS.
         | 
         | The fact that there are other, yet-to-be-discovered genes that
         | could also cause ALS is irrelevant for the individuals that are
         | already positive for the SOD1, for example.
        
           | carbocation wrote:
           | I guess you disagree with my point that having a disease is
           | different from having the risk allele for it, but I stand by
           | that distinction.
           | 
           | I specifically addressed timing of onset being important in
           | my original comment, because that matters to the person
           | living with the problem.
        
             | ferfumarma wrote:
             | I agree: the word "disease" necessarily implies signs or
             | symptoms of some kind. But what does that add?
             | 
             | The entire _point_ of the article is that the carriers are
             | not symptomatic yet, so where 's the confusion?
        
       | A7C3D5 wrote:
       | I lost two friends to ALS within the span of a year. Barring huge
       | advances in treating this, which I don't see happening anytime
       | soon, I fully plan to take the easier way out should it ever
       | happen to me. Horrific doesn't even begin to describe it.
       | 
       | Medically assisted suicide should be a federal right. It's
       | abhorrently shameful that we wouldn't allow a dog to die this
       | way, yet somehow it's acceptable to watch a parent or spouse to
       | go through this with NO HOPE of recovery. It makes me so angry.
        
         | RecycledEle wrote:
         | You can always kill yourself.
         | 
         | Codifying medically assisted suicide into law would lead to
         | abuses. I recall a case where family members and doctors held
         | someone down who was fighting and forced lethal poison down the
         | person's throat.
         | 
         | At the very least, we must have mandatory video recording and
         | reporting of everything related to an assisted suicide and a
         | mandatory life-without-parole sentence for those convicted of
         | abusing legal euthanasia. We can not let doctors hold someone
         | down and force poison down their throats then only get a few
         | years in prison.
         | 
         | This is too much like the abortion debate where babies who
         | survived attempted abortions were left to die instead of being
         | cared for.
        
           | at_a_remove wrote:
           | >You can always kill yourself.
           | 
           | Mostly technically true. Once you're locked in, or paralyzed,
           | it becomes quite more difficult.
           | 
           | But right now, _most_ suicide methods that are available live
           | in the less pleasant octants of the availability
           | /suffering/uncertainty space. We used to have some fairly
           | pleasant -- by comparison -- deaths available to us but
           | they're getting harder to access, leaving the nasty route
           | behind. Coal gas? Gone the way of Plath. Barbiturates? Out-
           | moded now, know a vet? It isn't like you can nip down to the
           | corner for some laudanum like back in the day.
        
           | widowlark wrote:
           | if you have ALS, and are bound to your wheelchair, how do you
           | accomplish this?
        
           | gautamcgoel wrote:
           | > You can always kill yourself.
           | 
           | This is usually painful and unpleasant, and also difficult
           | for people with serious impairments (like ALS, for example).
           | Perhaps euthanasia should be legal and perhaps not, but in
           | any case the quick and painless death available via injection
           | is very different from the death you would experience from
           | hanging yourself (for example). There are dignified deaths
           | and undignified deaths, and I think we should be clear about
           | this distinction.
        
           | JumpCrisscross wrote:
           | > _recall a case where family members and doctors held
           | someone down who was fighting and forced lethal poison down
           | the person 's throat_
           | 
           | Shockingly, this is not a legitimate method of euthanasia. At
           | the point that you've defrauded an autopsy to that degree,
           | you could just have a doctor shoot them in the head and write
           | heart attack on the death certificate.
        
         | polski-g wrote:
         | Euthanasia is legal in Oregon.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | gedy wrote:
         | I don't disagree per se, but I don't see why federal right is
         | so important. We have US states that allow it, so one can
         | relocate to states where people have voted for it if that's
         | what they want.
         | 
         | Federal power getting involved could also just as easily block
         | it from everyone.
        
           | MisterBastahrd wrote:
           | Yeah, because relocating is just SO easy. Just ask all the
           | women who are being forced into getting sepsis in their home
           | states because abortion providers are afraid to treat them
           | until they can prove that they have a life threatening
           | illness.
        
             | gedy wrote:
             | And to my point, what if this was federally banned
             | outright? Having state options is better IMHO than a no-
             | compromise federal law one way or other on controversial
             | issues.
        
           | patmorgan23 wrote:
           | Because the expense of relocating to another state and the
           | stress/alienation of moving away from family and friends when
           | you already require intense medical care is exactly what's
           | needed.
        
           | lotsofpulp wrote:
           | > We have US states that allow it, so one can relocate to
           | states where people have voted for it if that's what they
           | want.
           | 
           | This is not easy for people of limited means, hence a federal
           | law enshrining people's civil rights over their own
           | existence.
        
         | lend000 wrote:
         | My understanding is that doctor assisted suicide is legal under
         | certain circumstances in California. My father watched his
         | terminally ill friend pass this way, and apparently the person
         | needs to be able to drink the poison themselves, which could be
         | a problem for someone with a paralyzing disease like ALS.
         | Whatever they gave him also didn't look particularly painless.
         | 
         | Even more important would be access to experimental/unapproved
         | treatments for people with terminal illnesses. It's mind
         | boggling that the government still outlaws dying people from
         | trying new drugs to potentially save themselves and advance
         | medicine because they might be dangerous.
        
       | jawns wrote:
       | My family has been affected by another devastating disease with a
       | clear genetic marker, Huntington's Disease. If a parent has the
       | genetic mutation that causes the disease, each of their children
       | has a 50 percent chance of inheriting the mutation.
       | Unfortunately, while there has been some work to stave off and
       | lessen symptoms, there is no cure, which makes it a very
       | difficult decision for someone to be tested for the mutation.
       | 
       | In both of these cases (genetic ALS and genetic HD) I think right
       | now the best we can do is have realistic expectations about what
       | physicians, nurses, aides, and others on a person's care team can
       | do, and also to recognize that there are going to be a lot of
       | questions that don't have great answers yet.
       | 
       | Ultimately, I expect that the greatest breakthroughs for these
       | diseases will come through researchers who only indirectly work
       | with patients, but I have the utmost respect for front-line
       | health care workers who accompany these patients through a
       | terrible situation.
        
         | DawsonBruce wrote:
         | I lost my father to Huntington's Disease at a young age, and
         | have had to live the 50% inheritance chance reality my entire
         | life. I've never been tested for the disease, but I probably
         | should be eventually. I really hope I don't have it, and only
         | time (or a test) will tell.
        
           | Metacelsus wrote:
           | Please get tested before you have kids. If you're a carrier,
           | it's possible to avoid passing it to your kids using embryo
           | selection.
        
             | jawns wrote:
             | Note to anyone who is unfamiliar:
             | 
             | Technically, this approach does not avoid passing the
             | genetic mutation to the children you conceive. Each embryo
             | still has a 50/50 chance of inheriting it.
             | 
             | Instead, the embryos that have the genetic mutation are
             | discarded, and only the embryos without the mutation are
             | implanted.
             | 
             | If you believe that directly ending a human life at any
             | stage, including embryonic development, is immoral or
             | morally problematic, this is probably not an approach you
             | would feel comfortable taking.
        
               | siftrics wrote:
               | "using embryo selection" makes your point with far fewer
               | words.
               | 
               | I don't see how else the word "selection" could be
               | interpreted in this context.
        
               | CoastalCoder wrote:
               | I read the GP as an (oddly worded) effort to raise
               | additional considerations.
        
               | siftrics wrote:
               | Fair enough.
        
         | jvm___ wrote:
         | Huntington's is horrible.
         | 
         | You die like ALS when your lungs stop working. Before that,
         | starting in your 40's to 60's you start getting symptoms of
         | schizophrenia and Parkinson's, so loss of motor control and
         | delusional thought processes. If you know you have it you'll
         | eventually not be able to trust your own judgement.
         | 
         | My wife's grandma and uncle's died of it. Grandma was a lady I
         | only met as someone who laid in bed with her eyes open but no
         | movement or indication she saw you. She did still like
         | applesauce by the end. We didn't know if she was there or just
         | locked in.
         | 
         | One Uncle, before he was put in a home was living with his
         | girlfriend.
         | 
         | Why are you sitting at the window? George is bringing me my
         | money. Who's George? My old boss from 20 years ago. You haven't
         | seen him in years, does he know you've moved twice and now live
         | above a store in a very small rural town? Don't ask questions!
         | He's coming to bring me my money today...
         | 
         | Huntington's is not what you want to get.
         | 
         | There's a family genetic mystery as to how Grandma only got the
         | disease. August wedding and a December birth in the 1940's. Who
         | was the real father?
        
       | swid wrote:
       | https://archive.ph/lEynt
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-09-21 23:01 UTC)