[HN Gopher] Car allergic to vanilla ice cream (2000)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Car allergic to vanilla ice cream (2000)
        
       Author : isomorph
       Score  : 1595 points
       Date   : 2023-09-20 14:14 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.cs.cmu.edu)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.cs.cmu.edu)
        
       | WhitneyLand wrote:
       | The fact that as more ice cream is eaten more people tend to
       | drown, can be useful in discussing how correlation is different
       | than cause.
        
       | jplona wrote:
       | This was a puzzler on Car Talk at least once. There are more like
       | it: https://www.cartalk.com/radio/puzzler
        
       | huehehue wrote:
       | Oh man, I'm currently fighting a problem with a mid-70s coupe
       | that's driving me equally batty.
       | 
       | Randomly during longer trips, the car will just die for no
       | discernible reason. It's the Car of Theseus at this point with
       | how much I've replaced, but the issue persists, and the nature of
       | these intermittent problems makes debugging a nightmare. More
       | puzzling still that the car starts up fine after a short nap.
        
         | SkyPuncher wrote:
         | I'm sure you've tried a bunch, so my comments might be talking
         | into the void.
         | 
         | I had a similar issue that turned out to be a slightly loose
         | battery connection. While the battery clamp was making contact
         | with the battery terminal, I didn't tighten it enough and it
         | made poor contact.
         | 
         | Is it correlated to temperature at all? If it is, I wouldn't be
         | shocked if something, like a relay, is building up heat and
         | increasing resistance to the point of operating incorrectly. A
         | short nap might give that component enough time to cool off.
        
         | pryelluw wrote:
         | What brand model is it?
        
           | huehehue wrote:
           | Mercedes 450SLC
        
             | jacquesm wrote:
             | Wiring harness issue. Reseat any and all connectors from
             | the battery to the distribution box (there may be two of
             | those depending on the model year) and reseat all of your
             | fuses, if any of them go in too easy then use a small
             | screwdriver to force the contacts to be closer together (or
             | slightly twist the fuse tab, not the most elegant solution
             | but sometimes those contacts in the fuse box are so far
             | recessed that you can't get at them). Good luck!
        
         | legitster wrote:
         | Assuming there are not a lot of electronics on a 70s car, this
         | sounds like a fuel issue.
        
         | HeyLaughingBoy wrote:
         | I had a Toyota pickup that would die randomly, sometimes at
         | highway speeds. Although in those cases, the engine would
         | restart after a second so it felt like you hit a brick wall
         | then kept going. A friend suggested a bad fuel pump. OK,
         | replace the pump and filter (it was cheap and an easy R/R) but
         | no change in behavior.
         | 
         | After a while, I correlated the problem to very high humidity:
         | usually happened during heavy fog or rain. So, it's probably an
         | ignition problem, right? Replace spark plugs. Nope. Distributor
         | cap/rotor. Nope. High performance plug wires. Nope.
         | 
         | Drove me nuts for about two years. Then one day I'm in my
         | garage looking for something and I move my timing light out of
         | the way. Hmmm, didn't think about that...
         | 
         | After two years, problem turned out to be timing slightly out
         | of spec. Fixed in five minutes!
        
         | convFixb wrote:
         | Cracked fuel line? Might let air into the system in certain
         | operating points; might make the fuel pump unhappy (refuses to
         | prime) in some situations. I figured mine out when it finally
         | broke completely: All the other issues went away after
         | replacing it.
        
       | lotsofpulp wrote:
       | I find it incredible that not only a family would eat ice cream
       | every, but that they would travel to get it everyday instead of
       | just having it on hand in the house.
        
         | jallen_dot_dev wrote:
         | Or that a store would put it's vanilla ice cream in a separate
         | case in the front and all it's other flavors in another in the
         | back, instead of putting all it's frozen foods together in the
         | same area for logistical reasons.
        
           | lotsofpulp wrote:
           | Yes, now that you mention it, another part of the story that
           | is suspect.
        
             | Arrath wrote:
             | Hardly?
             | 
             | My local grocery store has a selection of ice creams in an
             | end-cap cooler at the face of an aisle. The complete frozen
             | goodies selection is down at the back end of the store. I
             | almost always snag what I want from the up front cooler
             | rather than making the trek to the back.
             | 
             | Plus the hand-held frozen goodies, like ice cream truck
             | fare, are usually in their own cooler separately from the
             | big stuff.
        
           | genewitch wrote:
           | all (and i mean all 6) convenience stores around me have a
           | separate "good humor" chest freezer in the front, directly
           | adjacent to the entrance, and the rest of the ice cream (here
           | it's blue bell invariably) is in a vertical case in the rear
           | of the store. I can go take pictures, if HN doesn't believe
           | the pervasiveness of this sort of thing!
        
             | lotsofpulp wrote:
             | I did not even imagine the possibility of shopping for ice
             | cream, daily, at a convenient store due to the extra costs
             | from convenient store pricing. But I guess it is in the
             | realm of possibility.
        
             | fragmede wrote:
             | the good humor company pays the convenience store to have
             | their freezer in that location in the store, and are the
             | ones responsible for keeping it stocked, unlike the rest of
             | the store.
        
         | TurboTveit wrote:
         | In addition I find it incredible that a commercial car would
         | get vapor locked after driving to get ice cream.
        
         | ajmurmann wrote:
         | Not to mention that the car company would send someone out not
         | only to their home, but in the evening and not only once but
         | for weeks. I'd even have a hard time believing this if they
         | loved next door to the companies HQ. Either the world has
         | changed a lot or this is totally made up.
        
       | timmorgan wrote:
       | My son's laptop screen kept shutting off while he was playing
       | American Truck Simulator. His truck would drive off the road
       | while the screen was black.
       | 
       | Every time I played on his laptop, this did not happen. He swore
       | he was cursed.
       | 
       | This went on for many days, with many instances where it would
       | happen for him but not for me. Then one day I just sat and
       | observed him while he played, looking for any difference. That's
       | when I noticed his watch band is metal with a magnetic clasp. The
       | position of his wrist on the laptop was tripping the hall sensor,
       | making the laptop think the lid was closed.
       | 
       | Him and I (and his mother) were glad to find out he is not
       | cursed. :-D
        
         | moduspol wrote:
         | This used to hit us sporadically at my university's help desk.
         | It'd also happen if you have one MacBook open on top of a
         | closed one. The magnet could easily line up and it'd shut the
         | screen off.
        
         | WirelessGigabit wrote:
         | And this bug made Apple move to a different sensor for the
         | screen angle. And Apple being Apple they now had the excuse to
         | serialize the sensor:
         | 
         | https://www.ifixit.com/News/33952/apple-put-a-hinge-sensor-i...
        
           | ClassyJacket wrote:
           | If it was Tesla they would have forgone any sensor done
           | computer vision on the webcam feed to determine if the lid is
           | open or closed. I'm looking at you, terrible automatic
           | wipers.
        
           | w-m wrote:
           | While screens of earlier MacBooks could be turned off with a
           | single magnet, my 2020 Intel MBP requires both the left and
           | the right sensor (around the tab and the enter key) to
           | trigger at the same time to consider it closed. It would be
           | nearly impossible to trigger that accidentally. For starters,
           | you'd need to wear two watches..
        
             | sjackso wrote:
             | Maybe this has been fixed in recent models, but ten years
             | ago it was easy to experience baffling laptop sleep states
             | if you happened to set a working macbook down on top of
             | another, similarly-sized macbook with its lid closed.
        
               | WirelessGigabit wrote:
               | Probably helped as before this it was a magnet.
        
       | taneq wrote:
       | A couple of weeks ago I got back from a remote site, the only
       | diagnostic info we had beforehand for one of the issues was that
       | the mobile equipment would trip out with a CANbus error. The
       | operator would isolate the equipment, then it'd come good. I was
       | struggling to find the software fault since, if a simple off-and-
       | on-again fixed it, clearly it was a software problem.
       | 
       | I got to site and found a loose connector on an IO module under
       | the operator's movable arm rest. It was the connector that
       | carried the CAN comms. I plugged it in. No more dramas.
       | 
       | I can only surmise that the process of them slamming the arm rest
       | up, tromping down the stairs, flicking the isolator off and on,
       | tromping back up the stairs, and slamming the armrest down was
       | enough to re-seat the loose connection temporarily.
        
       | mulhoon wrote:
       | There's a whole collection of Software Folklore over here
       | https://beza1e1.tuxen.de/lore/
       | 
       | Relevant thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23005140
        
         | teddyh wrote:
         | "COMPUTER-RELATED HORROR STORIES, FOLKLORE, AND ANECDOTES"
         | 
         | <https://www.cs.earlham.edu/~skylar/humor/Unix/computer.folkl..
         | .>
         | 
         | "Computer Stupidities"
         | 
         | <http://www.rinkworks.com/stupid/>
        
       | bell-cot wrote:
       | This reminds me of a GM minivan that my youngest brother-in-law
       | drove, back in the '80's. He'd gotten it from his father, who was
       | a career GM automotive engineer - and complained that,
       | occasionally & randomly, it would not start. It seemed like the
       | minivan's whole electrical system was dead...
       | 
       | Brother-in-law was known to be "not so good" with cars - so his
       | automotive engineer father didn't take the complaints seriously.
       | 
       | Complaints and emotions escalated, until brother-in-law convinced
       | his dad to swap vehicles for a month, so (he hoped) his dad could
       | experience the problem for himself.
       | 
       | After the problem manifested in the parking lot of the GM
       | Technical Center, and the whole crowd of GM engineers surrounding
       | the vehicle couldn't figure out why the heck the electrical
       | system seemed to be dead, my brother-in-law felt pretty
       | vindicated.
        
         | PaulHoule wrote:
         | GM cars are notorious for (sometimes) developing strange
         | problems that would have you think they are possessed with the
         | devil. (Despite post-1990 GM cars being near peers to Japanese
         | cars for reliability overall)
        
           | westmeal wrote:
           | What are you talking about the 90s was the worst era for GM
           | they cheaped out on everything possible.
        
             | PaulHoule wrote:
             | I dunno. When my son needed a car to get to work we found a
             | 1996 Buick Park Avenue in almost perfect condition at
             | 100,000 miles. He didn't like the look of modern cars,
             | didn't want a touchscreen, besides a 2010 Japanese car can
             | cost almost new prices and they wanted $9k for a Chevy
             | Sonic with 180,000 miles (didn't know they went that far!)
             | 
             | Granted the traction control and anti-lock brakes
             | occasionally fail to boot up, but it seems to be a pretty
             | good car, but it was close to the top of the line. Gets 27
             | mpg which is not bad for a big ass car. I like how it has a
             | lot of the feel of a 1970s boat but it has airbags, OBD II
             | and most of the good features of a modern car... And we
             | didn't need to get a loan to afford it. Driving home though
             | I was looking in the mirror and seeing it dwarfed by
             | today's XXL trucks and SUVs.
        
           | c22 wrote:
           | I had a 1989 Chrysler LeBaron that developed insane
           | electrical issues. Windshield wipers would randomly turn on,
           | the radio would change stations by itself. It really did seem
           | possessed.
        
             | kup0 wrote:
             | When I was a kid my (not wealthy) family had a Lincoln
             | Towncar that was probably purchased used and fixed up and
             | it ended up with some freaky electrical problems like you
             | describe- most notably (because it freaked me out as a
             | small child) I remember the automatic door locks would
             | start locking/unlocking themselves rapidly, and they were
             | big chunky metal switches that pop up and down and made an
             | awful sound when this happened
        
           | dylan604 wrote:
           | i learned that these things typically are grounding issues.
           | it usually came down to a single source of ground being a
           | loose connection which is why it was intermittent. as a
           | personal anecdote to this, as a first car as a teenager, i
           | drove a GM/Chevy S-10 that one day started to have issues
           | where all of the gauges on the dash would just go crazy and
           | the lights would go on and off, and then suddenly just start
           | working again. after taking it to the shop my dad
           | recommended, a mechanic walked out to greet me. after i told
           | him the symptoms, he stepped back to look at the truck model,
           | asked me to confirm the year model. he promptly opened the
           | driver side door, reached under the dash, located a specific
           | screw, hand tightened it as a test, and everything worked. he
           | came back with a screw driver to properly tighten in before
           | sending me on my way free of charge. he told me that specific
           | model was notorious for the screw holding the ground wire to
           | come loose. it would cost him more in time to write up a
           | sales slip to charge me.
        
             | bandyaboot wrote:
             | I think independent mechanics tend to opt for earning
             | goodwill in this situation rather than charging fair value
             | for a quick and easy fix. Objectively, he provided more
             | value than someone who might have spent several hours of
             | troubleshooting time, but customers don't necessarily think
             | logically about it. So it ends up being better for the
             | mechanic to earn that goodwill rather than appear "greedy".
        
               | dylan604 wrote:
               | Some do the freebies because that's who they are, and the
               | free publicity is just a secondary effect. Some do the
               | freebie because they know the publicity as the primary
               | reason. I feel like this experience was the former.
        
           | dkarl wrote:
           | > Despite post-1990 GM cars being near peers to Japanese cars
           | for reliability overall
           | 
           | American carmakers really needed that kick in the ass from
           | Japan. Around 1990 was when my parents went from being
           | protectionist, "buy American" to never buying another
           | domestic car again in their lives. They were angry, angry at
           | the reliability difference and angry knowing that domestic
           | carmakers could have done better but instead relied on people
           | like them to buy the flag.
        
           | phkahler wrote:
           | >> GM cars are notorious for (sometimes) developing strange
           | problems that would have you think they are possessed with
           | the devil.
           | 
           | Like turning on the backup lights in a parking lot when the
           | engine isn't even running.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | danaris wrote:
           | I mean...it's possible they've improved a lot compared to
           | where they were 30+ years ago, but to call GM's cars "near
           | peers to Japanese cars for reliability" just doesn't hold up.
           | 
           | On Consumer Reports' list of car brands by reliability[0],
           | none of GM's brands even crack the top 10. GMC and Chevy are
           | 20 and 21, respectively, out of 25 brands. (The top 5
           | include, unsurprisingly, Toyota, Lexus, and Honda--your
           | classic reliable Japanese brands.)
           | 
           | [0] https://www.consumerreports.org/cars/car-reliability-
           | owner-s... (may be paywalled...?)
        
           | hinkley wrote:
           | I learned a lot of things from my father. Unfortunately a lot
           | of them were what not to do. Don't buy cheap tools that
           | you'll have to replace three times in the lifespan of one
           | that costs 50% more. And don't buy GM.
           | 
           | Mechanically they may be reliable, but 90's GM forgot how to
           | make paint stick to metal and had to pay to repaint a massive
           | number of vehicles that simply pealed if parked outside for
           | too long. How?
           | 
           | And there is absolutely no forgiveness in my soul for the
           | Chevy Citation. I joked when I moved to Seattle that the main
           | problem is since there is no salt, there are still Citations
           | on the road and that is unnatural. Their place in the natural
           | order is the junk yard.
        
             | BoxOfRain wrote:
             | >I joked when I moved to Seattle that the main problem is
             | since there is no salt, there are still Citations on the
             | road and that is unnatural. Their place in the natural
             | order is the junk yard.
             | 
             | This was the fate of many British Leyland cars, even the
             | ones that people genuinely liked such as as the classic
             | Mini and the MGB were practically hygroscopic.
        
               | hinkley wrote:
               | I will say I was somewhat delighted by the number of good
               | looking mustangs and british roadsters there were. And so
               | many Beetles. My roadster had a little too much bondo for
               | my liking.
        
               | jacquesm wrote:
               | I loved the Mini, but I loved my Maxi even more. That was
               | the most useful car ever bar none.
        
               | hinkley wrote:
               | I didn't realize the Countryman was bigger than a
               | midsized sedan until I parked next to one the other day.
               | Walking back to my car something seemed off. Wait, that's
               | a Mini??
        
               | jacquesm wrote:
               | None of the 'Mini's' are Mini. They're just BMW that
               | bought the brand and builds cars loosely inspired on the
               | original, with sizes ranging from 1.25 times the original
               | all the way up to definitely non-Mini crossovers. Our
               | company had one of the smaller ones as a lease car and
               | even though it drove ok'ish it definitely didn't feel or
               | drive like a small car. It was a way for BMW to appeal
               | more to women (with that demographic BMW never really
               | caught on) who loved the original Mini to bits. And then
               | wealthy women want a larger but still trendy car.
               | 
               | BMW is hyper aggressive about the brand, including going
               | after each and every use of the brand for the original
               | cars, even when used in the context of spare parts.
        
               | hinkley wrote:
               | I think about eight, ten years ago they stopped being
               | mini when collision safety laws changed. They had to
               | raise the hood for pedestrian safety (hitting legs and
               | spinning heads into the windshield is not allowed) and
               | raise the door height for side impact safety. The whole
               | car got normal sized because of it and then they just
               | kinda said fuck it.
        
             | dreamcompiler wrote:
             | > 90's GM forgot how to make paint stick to metal and had
             | to pay to repaint a massive number of vehicles that simply
             | pealed if parked outside for too long. How?
             | 
             | Dodge Ram Trucks had exactly the same problem. I also have
             | no idea how two different companies with 100 years of
             | history simply forgot how to paint cars.
        
             | bregma wrote:
             | After owning my 1988 Chevrolet Beretta for about a year,
             | the paint came off in one big sheet one morning when I was
             | brushing a light dusting of snow off with my wool toque.
             | 
             | The first call to GM revealed that it was the acid rain
             | (acid rain in the 1980s was what global warming is today --
             | the cause of all evil). Exposing my car to rain voided the
             | warranty.
             | 
             | The second call to GM revealed that ultraviolet light
             | destroyed the bond between the paint and the primer.
             | Exposing my car to sunlight voided the warranty.
             | 
             | I spent hours researching this issue through the trade mags
             | and published court filings. Plenty of legal findings about
             | implied warranties of fitness for purpose. Evidently GM had
             | an unpublished policy that it would pay the cost of a
             | repaint to dealers for this situation, and the dealer was
             | expected to provide the work for free.
             | 
             | Of course, the greasy grin of the dealer as he quoted full
             | price while knowing he would collect the same from GM was
             | enough to make me drive the car with no paint for the next
             | 10 years so everyone could see, and recommend nobody
             | purchase any GM product ever again.
             | 
             | I'll say this though: that primer sure prevented rust.
        
               | hinkley wrote:
               | I wonder if the irony of the situation is that some
               | chemical engineer invented a new primer that sticks to
               | metal extremely well and it turned out that it may stick
               | to metal like glue but it doesn't stick to paint as well
               | as the old stuff.
               | 
               | But based on what peeled, I'd say thermal expansion or UV
               | damage were involved. The former could still be the
               | primer's "fault".
        
             | joshmarinacci wrote:
             | Why in the world did GM make a car with the name Citation?
             | Are there any good connotations of that word?
        
               | hydrok9 wrote:
               | Citation just means to be noted for something ("Cited for
               | valour.")
        
               | dotancohen wrote:
               | But in the context of motor vehicles, the term is highly
               | associated with infractions and monetary fines.
        
               | toast0 wrote:
               | I mean, people like fast cars, so the Chevy Speeding
               | Ticket should be a good seller.
        
               | dotancohen wrote:
               | You do have a point!
        
               | dotancohen wrote:
               | > Are there any good connotations of that word?
               | 
               | A few other GM vehicles have this issue, Chevy in
               | particular. A well known example is the market failure of
               | calling a car Nova (No-Va) in South America.
        
               | danaris wrote:
               | Except that's not actually true:
               | https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/chevrolet-nova-name-
               | spanis...
        
               | dotancohen wrote:
               | You know, I've heard that rebuttal, but I've been told
               | this anecdote of the car's notoriety by family members
               | from Columbia and more recently from a friend from
               | Argentina. So perhaps "no va" and "Nova" are pronounced
               | differently, and perhaps the car did sell well, but the
               | Spanish-speaking peoples most certainly did find the term
               | "no va" in the car's name.
               | 
               | You should know what they say about the Mitsubishi
               | Pajero, too!
        
               | Shorel wrote:
               | It's the same difference as between papa and papa. We are
               | trained to perceive different accented syllables as
               | different words with different meanings.
        
               | dotancohen wrote:
               | Sure, we have these in my language as well. For instance,
               | the car Kia should be written like "vomit" - so we have a
               | convoluted spelling and say the name slightly wrong to
               | distance the word from "vomit". But it's still clear to
               | everybody how the name should be pronounced and spelled.
               | 
               | Doesn't seem to affect sales, though, probably like the
               | Chevy Nova. Those Kia are everywhere.
        
               | bombcar wrote:
               | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cessna_Citation_family
               | 
               | Relatively famous business jet.
        
               | tacon wrote:
               | >Are there any good connotations of that word?
               | 
               | Of course there are: "a mention of a praiseworthy act or
               | achievement in an official report, especially that of a
               | member of the armed forces in wartime" Don't focus on the
               | North American usage of "a traffic citation". Citation is
               | almost a contranym, which is a word that has at least two
               | meanings that are opposites of each other, i.e. bolt,
               | bound, buckle, cleave, clip, consult, ...
               | 
               | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:English_contranym
               | s
        
               | jstanley wrote:
               | Simple, it's so that every time someone reads "citation
               | needed" on Wikipedia, it triggers the buy impulse.
        
               | dmurray wrote:
               | It's also the name of a brand of private jet, and of what
               | used to be the most successful racehorse in the world.
               | 
               | I'd guess both the car and the plane owe their names to
               | the horse.
        
               | hinkley wrote:
               | Technically Chevrolet did but the entire thought process
               | for that vehicle was questionable so the name is IMO a
               | harbinger. This is not a place of honor.
        
               | PaulHoule wrote:
               | I think it's funny how GM came out with the "Cavalier" to
               | compete with Honda's "Civic". Or that matter, there was a
               | Chevy Cobalt (e.g. a "Kobold" is a demon that causes mine
               | accidents) or an AMC Gremlin.
        
               | jstarfish wrote:
               | There's always the business-school legend about the
               | failure of the Nova with the Spanish market.
        
               | istjohn wrote:
               | > The statement refers to a popular anecdote in
               | international business and marketing about a supposed
               | blunder made by American automaker Chevrolet with the car
               | model, "Nova."
               | 
               | > According to the story, when Chevrolet tried to market
               | the Nova in Spanish-speaking countries, the car
               | reportedly did not sell well because in Spanish, "no va"
               | translates to "doesn't go". This led people to joke that
               | a car named "doesn't go" wouldn't be a popular choice.
               | 
               | > However, it's important to note that this is largely a
               | myth. In reality, the Chevrolet Nova was relatively
               | successful in Spanish-speaking markets. "Nova" as a word
               | is understood to mean "new star" in Spanish, and it's
               | unlikely Spanish speakers would naturally break up the
               | term into "no" and "va", just like English speakers
               | wouldn't naturally break up "notable" into "no" and
               | "table".
               | 
               | > But the story remains popular as a cautionary tale of
               | the consequences of not considering linguistic and
               | cultural differences when naming products for
               | international markets.
        
               | genewitch wrote:
               | Dat Soon?
        
               | danaris wrote:
               | ...But cobalt is both a color and an element...?
               | 
               | Sure, the name is derived from "kobold", but that's like
               | saying you should never call anything good "terrific",
               | because it derives from the root "terror". Etymology
               | isn't destiny.
        
               | hotnfresh wrote:
               | There's also the aircraft series:
               | 
               | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cessna_Citation_family
               | 
               | Those are named after a race horse. Car may also be for
               | the race horse. Or maybe the car's named after the
               | plane(s).
        
               | GauntletWizard wrote:
               | I would love to drive a Chevy Potoooooooo
        
             | astrange wrote:
             | > Mechanically they may be reliable, but 90's GM forgot how
             | to make paint stick to metal and had to pay to repaint a
             | massive number of vehicles that simply pealed if parked
             | outside for too long. How?
             | 
             | Could be an older component stopped being available. Like
             | when Apple switched to environmentally friendly lead free
             | solder, but then the NVidia laptop GPUs got so hot they
             | unsoldered themselves.
        
         | rectang wrote:
         | Heisenbugs are manifestations of whole-system design failings,
         | where projects are not engineered to facilitate
         | troubleshooting, subsystems are strongly coupled, and
         | everything is just barely held together with baling wire and
         | bubblegum.
         | 
         | That GM vehicles from this infamous era would suffer from
         | maddening, mysterious electrical glitches makes perfect sense.
        
           | reedf1 wrote:
           | Tell me you only use memory managed languages without telling
           | me...
        
             | freedomben wrote:
             | please expand to include more explanation for why you think
             | this is a memory managed lanugage problem. I used C and C++
             | professionally for years and ran into all sorts of issues
             | like this. Interaction between subsystems doesn't care at
             | all what language you're using inside each component, they
             | care about design patterns and architecture.
        
               | rectang wrote:
               | GP is correct that I generally prefer memory managed
               | languages, I just think it's right to emphasize that this
               | preference is informed by experience. I've spent large
               | amounts of my career writing C code, and now when I have
               | a choice I'd prefer Rust for systems projects.
               | 
               | The higher-level point is that _Heisenbugs are an
               | emergent phenomenon of complex systems when fundamentals
               | are lacking._
               | 
               | * C systems are lacking because the language is very old
               | and we've learned that we need additional infrastructure
               | to avoid memory errors.
               | 
               | * 1980s GM systems were lacking because of a management
               | culture which didn't value reliability, leading to
               | inevitable issues in e.g. poor grounding and electrical
               | isolation.
               | 
               | It's my belief that many contemporary tech companies have
               | management cultures similar to 1980s GM, and subsequently
               | waste tremendous resources when troubleshooting complex
               | systems which are not designed to facilitate
               | troubleshooting. That's why the original article
               | resonates strongly with me.
        
             | rectang wrote:
             | But I don't?
             | 
             | A formative early experience of mine was learning valgrind
             | to track down a Heisenbug for a C project I was working on
             | (which turned out to be an invalid read in a dependency).
             | I'm indeed thinking of this anecdote when generalizing
             | about whole-systems failings, since troubleshooting memory
             | errors is so difficult.
             | 
             | I think there's an analogy to be drawn when designing large
             | systems on top of unsound foundations.
        
         | addaon wrote:
         | I have a 2009 Mercedes SLK that had the same symptom. It was
         | absolutely fine 99.9% of the time, but one time in a thousand
         | it wouldn't even try to start. No clicks, no indication that it
         | even knew I was in there turning the key. Just dead. And then
         | seven or eight hours later... it would start fine, as if
         | nothing ever happened. Couldn't correlate it to anything.
         | 
         | Had it towed to a service center a few times when this
         | happened. Every time, by the time they got around to trying it
         | (a few hours later)... it would start fine, with nothing to
         | diagnose.
         | 
         | Then, it was 99% of the time it was fine. I was with a group of
         | folks car-camping off road to fly a human powered airplane for
         | a couple days, and... no start. Finally started -- with no sign
         | of any problems -- around noon the next day, and I high-tailed
         | it out of there a day before the rest of the group, because
         | getting stuck there /after/ the rest of the group would have
         | started pushing my comfort level. So at this point it's
         | actually interfering with my life.
         | 
         | I've tried all the usual stochastic troubleshooting (swapping
         | out fuses, light to moderate percussive maintenance, alternate
         | keys) and nothing. Finally it fails to start in my driveway,
         | and I get it towed to an independent mechanic. It's short tow,
         | and it fails to start when it gets there! So now he's seen the
         | problem, and is as puzzled as I am. Of course, when he tries
         | again the next morning, it starts fine.
         | 
         | He proposes two possible fixes: replacing some ECU module, or
         | replacing the fuse box itself (under the theory that it's the
         | connector or connection into the bottom of the fuse box that is
         | having some moisture ingress or intermittent connection). Of
         | course whatever we choose, I won't know if it was right or not
         | until the next time I'm stuck. The ECU is multiple thousands of
         | dollars, and the fuse box is < $200 with labor, so I make the
         | easy choice.
         | 
         | This was six or seven years ago, and that car is still my main
         | and only car. Hasn't had a single mechanical issue since
         | swapping out that fuse box. A good independent mechanic and a
         | good guess!
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | DoneWithAllThat wrote:
           | I have seen similar behavior on vehicles that have a dying
           | alternator. The issue is that one vane of the rotor (or maybe
           | stator?) has shorted and no longer functions. If when the car
           | is shut off and the rotor stops in a particular position the
           | alternator won't work. Give it some time and with
           | heating/cooling moving things around just a bit plus the act
           | of repeatedly trying to turn it on potentially making it move
           | just a bit, and it works fine.
        
             | addaon wrote:
             | Alternators aren't needed for starting. Perhaps a similar
             | issue with the starter motor? But even then you'd hear the
             | thunk of the starter solenoid. Any audible clue definitely
             | makes root-causing simpler.
        
               | bombcar wrote:
               | I have a crank sensor that is going out, and though it
               | still works most of the time if the crankshaft stops in
               | just the right position it becomes an absolute bear to
               | start, and runs in limp mode when it does.
               | 
               | Any of the other positions it works just fine.
        
               | I_Am_Nous wrote:
               | This reminds me of an old F250 my dad had. He towed it
               | from Colorado to Missouri and about halfway he noticed
               | his gas mileage got worse. But, you know, coasting down
               | mountains until you get to plains would also have a
               | similar outcome, so he didn't think about it.
               | 
               | Once he got to Missouri he noticed the transfer case (I
               | think) had somehow bounced out of neutral and was
               | partially engaged, which chewed many teeth off the
               | flywheel. To start it we had to get a pipe wrench and
               | manually rotate the flywheel to a spot with enough teeth
               | to catch the starter and turn over. That got harder and
               | harder (as it kept chewing off more teeth) so eventually
               | we had to push start it and pop the clutch. Thankfully it
               | was a manual so it still worked!
        
               | bombcar wrote:
               | My dad had an old diesel Benz - the generator (that old,
               | didn't have an alternator) went out and for a couple of
               | months we just made sure to park it on a hill and drive
               | during the day. Electricity is overrated!
        
           | osrec wrote:
           | Seen things like this before. Often a bad connection
           | somewhere, possibly involving material that expands/contracts
           | significantly in response to a change in temperature (turning
           | the module into an inadvertent temperature controlled
           | switch).
        
           | pixl97 wrote:
           | I had a truck do this kind of behavior once.
           | 
           | Finally figured it out after months when I moved a wire and
           | it started, then move the wire close to another wire and it
           | would no longer start. These were wires that would typically
           | be close, so my guess is one of the wires was now generating
           | enough noise that it was bleeding over into some other system
           | and causing it to fail. As the car bounced around the
           | proximity of the wires changed and lead to the random
           | behavior.
        
             | xenadu02 wrote:
             | EMF can do some seemingly crazy things. I built a kiln
             | controller and the initial version would sometimes randomly
             | lockup, reboot in the middle of an operation, or do other
             | seemingly "crazy" things. Sometimes even the hardware
             | watchdog would stop functioning.
             | 
             | Turns out contactors pulling in and out a 5000w load
             | generates some strong EMF and sometimes that EMF is enough
             | to cause random glitches to the CPU or other hardware.
             | 
             | Switching to high power solid state relays completely
             | solved the problem while keeping the system compact. The
             | actual silicon transistor was so big you could have drawn
             | the mask by hand and it was attached to a heat sink half
             | the size of an adult fist. I was initially worried about
             | reliability but (knock on wood) 8 years later the system is
             | still working without issue.
        
               | HeyLaughingBoy wrote:
               | Yeah. I wrote the code for a controller that managed the
               | temperature of a lubricant. The heater was a propane-
               | fired burner that was mounted on the same skid. Every so
               | often we'd get a random reboot. Finally, when it was very
               | quiet, I heard a soft 'tic' just before I noticed that
               | the CPU had rebooted again. EMI from the spark gap that
               | ignited the propane was coupling back into the I/O lines
               | and would occasionally reset the CPU.
               | 
               | One of those things where if it had happened 100% of the
               | time we'd have figured it out quickly. But it was so
               | infrequent that no one thought of that as a cause.
        
               | AdamJacobMuller wrote:
               | EMF is fun.
               | 
               | We had one access point (unifi) in our datacenter which
               | was consistently failing.
               | 
               | fail, RMA, fail, RMA, probably replaced that thing 5
               | times. It was also incredibly unreliable.
               | 
               | Meanwhile all the other access points (probably 10 of
               | them in total) had 0 issues.
               | 
               | Eventually realized that the cable for that AP was
               | running perpendicularly over the conduits which fed power
               | into our suite, so, about 1MW of power. Relocated the
               | cable so it was farther from the conduit and it never had
               | an issue again. Makes you wonder about the effect of
               | working in such environments.
        
               | hommelix wrote:
               | Most likely this solid state relay has a builtin flyback
               | diode that was not in the circuit of the contactor. The
               | diode should be as close as possible to the load to
               | reduce the EMF.
        
           | freedomben wrote:
           | What happened with the human-powered airplane?? Is that a
           | thing normies can do?
        
             | addaon wrote:
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DaSH_PA
             | 
             | I don't know if Alec Proudfoot counts as a normy, but DaSH
             | PA flew a bunch of times, with many different pilots. That
             | particular event, which was an attempt to try some records,
             | was a bust; there had been rain recently and the dry lake
             | beds weren't. Landing gear was a recurring problem (light
             | weight and robust don't go together), and even some last-
             | minute attempts to build a runway out of 4x8 plywood sheets
             | was unsuccessful.
             | 
             | I have some very, very fond memories of flight days at
             | Moffett, though. I had gotten to work on the Moffett runway
             | for work previously (so cool out at the bay end of the
             | runway at night, totally silent), and getting back there to
             | help run ground ops (including assembling DaSH PA before
             | sunrise so first flights would hit the calmest possible
             | air) was just lovely.
        
               | skykooler wrote:
               | That's really cool! I was only aware of the Gossamer
               | Condor/Albatross and MIT's Daedalus in that field.
        
               | addaon wrote:
               | Nope, it's at the point that there's whole gatherings
               | (most recently in the UK) where multiple aircraft and
               | their builders/pilots/communities meet.
        
           | m463 wrote:
           | wonder if removing and replacing the fuse box (reseating all
           | the fuses, reconnecting all wires, etc) would have done the
           | same thing? sigh.
        
             | addaon wrote:
             | It would have required removing and replacing the box
             | itself... the fuse box has a connector going into the back
             | side, and then a separate harness inside the box that
             | splits out the individual fuse sockets; that connector
             | seems to have been the problem. At various points I
             | swapped/reseated every fuse in there trying to fix things,
             | never occurred to me to remove the box itself.
        
           | parentheses wrote:
           | Today's car mechanics are a different breed. The ability to
           | diagnose and triangulate problems without advanced tools made
           | car mechanics quite intuitive and resourceful in the past. I
           | take my car to one such mechanic. I always leave with a bill
           | lower than any other estimate I get and he always finds and
           | fixes the problem.
        
           | bell-cot wrote:
           | Interesting that your car is a Mercedes...
           | 
           | I know an older guy at church, whose kids all graduated
           | college - except for one.
           | 
           | His "failed" son is the top mechanic at a Mercedes
           | dealership. He does some supervision, training, etc. But the
           | reason the dealership is paying him $200K/year is his skill
           | at figuring out and fixing problems like that, for the
           | dealership's most desirable and profitable customers.
           | 
           | (That I've heard, none of the mechanic's "successful"
           | siblings are making that kind of money.)
        
             | ekidd wrote:
             | Troubleshooting can be a very valuable skill.
             | 
             | I know a story of a certain large engineering firm, dating
             | back to the second World War. They had a senior engineer
             | who habitually came to work drunk and slept through
             | meetings. Every once in a while, they'd wake him up, and
             | he'd save them a couple of million dollars. He had a gift
             | for finding clever solutions.
             | 
             | He probably would have had a better life if he'd gotten his
             | act together. But knowing how to fix subtle issues, or how
             | to design good processes, can be a ridiculously valuable
             | skill.
        
           | kortex wrote:
           | That definitely sounds like a loose connection, not an ECU
           | problem. Usually it's a bad clamp on the battery terminal.
           | Often it's the ground clamp in particular.
           | 
           | The easiest diagnosis is to rotate the cables on the terminal
           | several times to rub off oxide build up, then leave them in
           | an orientation so that the natural tension of the cable
           | forces the clamp into good contact.
           | 
           | A "dead" (low voltage) battery will still cause some
           | indicators/lights to come on when you crank, while a bad
           | connection usually acts like zero volts.
        
             | foobazzy wrote:
             | I was about to say the same thing. My car (nowhere near as
             | nice as a Merc) had the same issue. There would be oxide
             | deposit on the contact points and the minuscule amount of
             | rust and crack on the clamp would render it useless on a
             | bumpy road randomly (1 in 10 times approx). It was scary
             | the first few times but when I figured out the symptoms, it
             | took me less than a minute to get it to start.
        
         | taejo wrote:
         | Plenty of cars that intermittently won't turn on in this
         | thread, but I once had a car that intermittently wouldn't turn
         | off... or at least the headlights wouldn't. I assume a relay
         | somewhere was overheating and that was making it stay closed,
         | but I never debugged it, and nor could my cousin who was an
         | auto mechanic. We never tried too hard, though: I would just
         | take the fuse out if it happened and put it back the next
         | morning.
        
           | HeyLaughingBoy wrote:
           | True story: I had that happen to an airplane. I was a student
           | on a long solo flight and on the last two legs of that
           | flight, the engine wouldn't shut off using the usual method
           | of pulling the throttle back to idle and turning off the
           | magneto.
           | 
           | It's been long enough that I don't remember what I did to get
           | it shut off (maybe I toggled a circuit breaker?), but when I
           | got back to base, I made a note in the airplane log about the
           | problem and also left a note for my instructor, who was out
           | that day.
           | 
           | When I came in for my next lesson, instructor mentioned that
           | the next person to use the airplane, also a student on a solo
           | cross-country, got stranded 100 miles away because when the
           | engine wouldn't shut off, he panicked and pulled the throttle
           | hard enough to rip the cable through the firewall. Airplane
           | had to be put on a flatbed to get it back home.
           | 
           | Guess he didn't see my note!
        
             | bombcar wrote:
             | Sounds like it might have been dieseling - enough carbon
             | buildup glowing hot that even with both magnetos off it can
             | still ignite the next rotation.
             | 
             | Usually there was a fuel disconnect along with the throttle
             | that would eventually starve the engine.
        
               | HeyLaughingBoy wrote:
               | That's probably what I did. Thinking back, the first time
               | it happened, it just took about 10-15 seconds to shut
               | off. The next time, when I was back at my home airport,
               | it wouldn't stop running at all and I think I turned the
               | fuel cutoff to get it to stop.
        
           | grecy wrote:
           | The radiator fan in my Jeep did that in Sudan when it was
           | 48C. Better to have it stuck on that stuck off in those
           | temps!
           | 
           | I just tapped the relay with a wrench and it un-stuck and
           | turned off.
           | 
           | Funny enough that was almost 5 years ago, and it hasn't done
           | it once since in more than 80,000 miles of driving. Not in
           | -35C, not in +45C. Odd little relay.
        
         | SkyPuncher wrote:
         | I'm going to armchair and guess that your brother needed a new
         | battery.
         | 
         | My (GM) car gets really funky startup behavior when the battery
         | gets old. It will often turn the starter fine, but the
         | electronics can get stuck in weird states until I disconnect
         | the battery (essentially a hard reset).
        
           | Filligree wrote:
           | If it was surrounded by a crowd of engineers, surely someone
           | would have tested the battery?
        
             | wolverine876 wrote:
             | A friend who is an automotive engineer shared once that
             | most colleages were not so great with cars. Engineering new
             | cars is one thing; fixing them is another. It's like asking
             | a programmer to do system administration - two different
             | jobs.
        
               | SkyPuncher wrote:
               | It's not much different than computers.
               | 
               | Lots of programmers that would struggle to diagnose basic
               | stuff when their laptop when it goes wrong.
        
             | roel_v wrote:
             | This is the point where I would tell the story of how I
             | once got lost in Porto, while in a group of 25 geographers
        
               | HeyLaughingBoy wrote:
               | But zero cartographers.
        
             | vGPU wrote:
             | The problem with having a bunch of experts is that experts
             | usually forget to check the basics.
             | 
             | I'm sure we've all been caught trying to troubleshoot a
             | problem where the actual issue was a loose cable.
        
               | aidenn0 wrote:
               | I worked tech support that included a device for software
               | developers that had Ethernet connectivity. I learned very
               | quickly to say "Try reseating the Ethernet cable" because
               | if I said "Is the Ethernet plugged in" about 1/3 of the
               | people would respond very negatively (e.g. "I'm not a
               | fucking moron") but by having to reseat the cable, they
               | would sometimes discover it's not plugged in.
        
               | fragmede wrote:
               | The other technique is to ask the customer to turn the
               | cable around.
        
               | dotancohen wrote:
               | The classic way to get the consumer to power cycle the
               | hardware is to ask them which color ring is at the base
               | of the DC plug. It doesn't really matter what color it
               | is, what matters is that it was removed and the hardware
               | definitely restarted.
        
               | datadrivenangel wrote:
               | I once has this happen with my father's new standing
               | desk. He, PhD with an Electrical Engineering degree,
               | couldn't get it working. Turned out the C13 power cable
               | was only 90% inserted, and felt firmly in place but did
               | not have enough connector to power the desk.
        
           | lotsofpulp wrote:
           | Subaru just had a class action lawsuit about their stupid car
           | infotainment systems draining the battery.
           | 
           | https://www.subarubatterysettlement.com/
           | 
           | The dealers wanted a ton of money to diagnose the issue, even
           | though I suspected it must have been the infotainment system
           | draining the battery. I just ended up replacing the
           | infotainment system with a cheap CarPlay compatible one and
           | the problem went away.
           | 
           | Problem is I cannot get money from the class action
           | settlement since the original infotainment system is already
           | out and I fixed it myself.
        
             | xethos wrote:
             | > Problem is I cannot get money from the class action
             | settlement since the original infotainment system is
             | already out and I fixed it myself.
             | 
             | You only fixed it _because_ it was a problem though. Not a
             | /your lawyer though, so good luck and have fun navigating
             | the American legal system!
        
               | lotsofpulp wrote:
               | But I cannot prove it without reinstalling the original
               | infotainment system. That is many, many hours of work for
               | little gain.
               | 
               | What I do not understand is how the settlement did not
               | require Subaru to compensate all Subaru owners for the
               | faulty design. Why was there proof required, other than
               | the purchase of their car with the faulty components?
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | cbm-vic-20 wrote:
       | See also: https://xkcd.com/1172/
        
       | lloeki wrote:
       | A decade and a half ago (or maybe two?), I was working at a
       | software service shop. This shop has been in charge of support of
       | a built-to-order native Win32 application (in Visual Basic or
       | Delphi or something like that) initially developed by another
       | previous company that had long disappeared.
       | 
       | One day a coworker got a support call from a user. Far from
       | mythical outbursts of irate customers, an understandable the
       | voice at the other end of the line remained extremely calm and
       | eager to help resolving the issue, although you could feel a
       | gleam of despair in the back of her voice.
       | 
       | The woman at the other end of the line had to input troves of
       | data daily in a specific form in the application, basically
       | taking a stack of whatever field-ridden paper forms they received
       | and entering them into the system via the equivalent digital form
       | manually.
       | 
       | She was adamant that every time she attempted to input a
       | specific, optional date the form would close on its own, losing
       | all of the input data. To make matters worse the specific date
       | was the last one to be entered, thus all the already-repetitive
       | hard work of inputting an entire form was getting even more
       | annoying.
       | 
       | To make matters even more complicated, she was working part-time,
       | in rotation with another person covering for days she was off.
       | The other person never encountered the problem!
       | 
       | So their solution for years had been that the woman who was
       | reaching out to our support would input everything but the
       | affected date field, save but not validate the form, and place
       | the paper form in a special basket; the second person would then
       | go through the paper stack again and fill the missing dates.
       | 
       | They would go to the extent of telling people who submitted the
       | form that the affected date would lengthen the form processing by
       | a few days. Somehow this flied quite well as people would
       | understand that this was a case where the date would imply more
       | work (as in, _actual_ work, e.g cross-checking more stuff or more
       | internal paperwork or whatever) on our customer 's side.
       | 
       | In any case, this solution would stop working soon as the woman
       | was going to go full time again and the other person in rotation
       | would move to do something else. The customer had put up with
       | this for an absurdly long time but now they were painted into a
       | corner so they were left with hardly any option but to reach out
       | for support.
       | 
       | We couldn't hardly believe this was happening, but the person was
       | very articulate and came up with a quite complete description of
       | the situation that in most support cases you only dream of
       | having. So my coworker dove into the code base, which was not
       | ours and only received the occasional bug fix or small
       | development to keep the software compliant. He could not find
       | anything in the code, he could not reproduce anything locally,
       | the date field - of any of the other fields for that matter -
       | looked like any other standard field, but there must have been
       | _something_.
       | 
       | Confounded, the only thing we could think of was that it only
       | happened on the user machine somehow. He asked to remotely
       | connect and try it on the user's machine. No dice. He asked for
       | the person to do it, anxiously watching as the user cautiously
       | moved the pointer towards the date field when suddenly the form
       | vanished! He went at it again and did the exact same thing, down
       | to when things are clicked or typed and whatnot, but nope! But
       | the user could still reliably reproduce it, over and over again.
       | 
       | Could it be that doing things through a remote connection affect
       | the ability to reproduce? Out of options, he asked for the other
       | person - which likely was at the office that day - that used to
       | input the form to come over and input the same thing directly,
       | watching the screen as fields filled up. It looked _exactly_ the
       | same as when the usual user was doing it, but _it worked_.
       | 
       | We now could not see any other option but to move the
       | investigation on site. Two people were tasked to that end to
       | cover all possible grounds and brainstorm on the spot.
       | 
       | Arriving on site, they were greeted by this very amenable woman
       | affected by the bug. They entered a small, poorly lit office, one
       | taking a seat next to the user and the other standing due to the
       | lack of space, and watched the user as she powered up an absurdly
       | small, overaged CRT screen, then booted the ancient PC. As the
       | user started typing on the $5 keyboard, moved the creaky mouse
       | around they could not help but feel compassion as they saw the
       | daily stack of paper forms that had to be entered every day, all
       | day long, using such poor equipment and inhumane conditions when
       | the customer company was throwing seemingly endless and
       | voluminous amounts of money at our employer.
       | 
       | Focusing on the actions on the screen, the team member leading
       | the investigation went through all stages of bewilderment and
       | despair as the user arched forward to aim at the impossibly tiny
       | date field on that tiny old screen, and just like that, the
       | window vanished. His mind helplessly racing, in the stillness of
       | the moment a voice raised up from behind:                   "Can
       | you do it again?"
       | 
       | Said the one standing up.
       | 
       | So, with unabated calmness only zen masters can achieve, she
       | nodded, proceeded with moves repeated a million times over, and
       | the window closed again.                   "Yup, I got it".
       | 
       | You see, one of the requirements for this digital form was to
       | match the paper form in layout _and wholly fit in the screen_. To
       | achieve that, the font size and UI element dimensions were
       | dialled down. On the user 's small, poor, aging screen in a badly
       | lit environment and with an impossibly bad mouse this made UI
       | elements spectacularly hard to interact with, especially the date
       | picker drop down. So when reaching to that specific optional date
       | picker in a specific place of the screen the user had to lurch
       | forward a bit to take a good look _and_ lurch a little bit
       | further and to the right to extend the arm to mover the pointer
       | over there and click to make the date picker appear. As it turns
       | out the affected user was a bit overweight and with this very
       | movement her - _ahem_ -  "sizeable" right breast ever so slightly
       | brushed against a key on the right side of the old, mushy
       | keyboard, in a way that made it register a keypress without any
       | audible or haptic feedback. That keypress - which I can't recall
       | which it is - turned out to be what closed the form.
       | 
       | We could have patched the software to prevent that from
       | happening. We didn't. Instead a report was produced that in no
       | uncertain terms - but not pointing at the _actual_ mechanical
       | details - a combination of hardware and poor, non-ergonomic work
       | environment was identified as the root cause; and not just that,
       | but through small talk it was learned that the reason she was
       | working part time was medical and largely caused by these
       | terrible work conditions, so we added a note  "as a courtesy"
       | they could maybe end up being liable for any health issue that
       | would "hypothetically" come up buy working in such environments.
       | She got a new computer and display, a proper keyboard an mouse, a
       | better desk and chair, and, I seem to recall, an additional
       | light. The customer complied, reported the issue as fixed, and as
       | far as we know the issue never occurred again.
        
       | tysam_and wrote:
       | Is this the new 500 mile story (or the second-place replacement?)
       | 
       | I don't know whether this is true or not, but either way:
       | incredible. Love this, and love the company for actually sending
       | someone on company time (!??!?!?!?) to check it out. <3 :'))))
        
       | maweaver wrote:
       | > Moral of the story: even insane-looking problems are sometimes
       | real.
       | 
       | To me the moral of the story (and my experience) is: user's
       | problems are usually real, but don't trust their ability to
       | diagnose the actual cause.
        
         | karmakaze wrote:
         | Stated another way, distinguish observations (facts) of a story
         | from the inferences--don't dismiss the observation/facts when
         | rejecting inferences. This is analogous to an XY problem.
        
           | dotancohen wrote:
           | When the client states that he has a problem, he is always
           | correct. When he tells you what the problem is, he is always
           | wrong.
        
             | Raineer wrote:
             | _Sometimes_ wrong...
             | 
             | I have the role of "chief troubleshooter" in my engineering
             | group. I have a bit of a nervous tic that forms when I hear
             | absolutes like this.
             | 
             | Don't assume the customer is always an idiot. Don't assume
             | ANYONE is always an idiot. It limits you as an engineer.
             | 
             | Listen to everything. You don't have any need to abide any
             | of it, but listen to it all.
             | 
             | I've had some of the least-qualified people throw out
             | something which absolutely ended up being insightful,
             | although sometimes in a way they didn't expect.
        
         | macintux wrote:
         | Related: as a troubleshooter, don't get locked into a theory
         | too quickly. You can easily overlook other information that
         | doesn't fit.
        
         | tantalor wrote:
         | There's a big difference between the proximate cause and root
         | cause.
         | 
         | Proximate cause: buy vanilla ice-cream
         | 
         | Root cause: vapor lock
         | 
         | The letter didn't assert that the ice cream was the root cause,
         | but made it very clear it was the proximate cause.
         | 
         | The Pontiac President, and the person who wrote that "moral of
         | the story", may have confused the two. But the engineer in the
         | study didn't.
        
           | zmmmmm wrote:
           | you can also frame it around correlation vs causation
        
         | astrobe_ wrote:
         | Indeed. A timing problem was my first thought when I read the
         | title which was obviously provocative, maybe that's because I
         | deal with timing problems often so I got lucky there, but I
         | rejected the idea, thinking the user would have noticed it too.
         | Nope.
         | 
         | I used to do some help desk as part of my dev job, and from my
         | experience, users easily assign any random fact as the source
         | of the problem. Often things like "correlation is causation" or
         | *post hoc ergo propter hoc" (after that, therefore because of
         | that). Good as heuristics, but bad when they are substitutes
         | for reasoning.
         | 
         | Users cannot diagnose at all because they have no idea of how
         | the thing they are using works (which often normal - we are the
         | engineers, they are the users) (in this regard, users that
         | think they know "that stuff" are among the most difficult to
         | deal with). One cannot properly diagnose something one doesn't
         | understand well.
        
       | dclowd9901 wrote:
       | I have an 83 Land Cruiser and knew immediately what the problem
       | must have been related to from the outset. It actually has a fan
       | that will kick on when the engine is turned off and the car
       | parked to blow on the carburetor and cool it off.
       | 
       | Incidentally, I still don't believe a word of this story (at
       | least as it's told here). The short delta of time difference
       | between walking _further_ into and out of a store would not have
       | enough impact on the cooling of the engine to make a such a
       | substantial difference as to it starting or not. It simply will
       | not bleed off that much more heat unless this store is a mile
       | long and it's an additional 20 minutes to get a different flavor.
       | 
       | The only reason I express the doubt over it is because it makes
       | the story a contrivance, which makes it pointless. If the
       | person's different activities _actually_ resulted in a
       | significant difference of time the car has been sitting, it's
       | likely the owner themselves would be able to easily deduce what
       | could really be the issue. By pretending the issue introduces
       | some very small delta of time, it arbitrarily masks the true
       | cause (which is the entire point of the story).
       | 
       | https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cone-of-silence/
        
         | jerf wrote:
         | "If the person's different activities _actually_ resulted in a
         | significant difference of time the car has been sitting, it's
         | likely the owner themselves would be able to easily deduce what
         | could really be the issue."
         | 
         | Oh, I wouldn't even remotely bet on that. Even in my
         | professional sphere of programming I've been caught by what I
         | call "cognitively available" theories of what the problem is
         | that turn out to be entirely wrong in the end, because the real
         | problem is something I wasn't even remotely considering before
         | hand, and possibly even would have dismissed if it had crossed
         | my mind.
         | 
         | If you don't even know what "vapor lock" is, and I assure you
         | this will describe the majority of car owners, why would you
         | think "time in store" is the difference?
         | 
         | What is cognitively available to this person is that they buy
         | different sorts of ice cream and that causes the problem. It
         | puts the spotlight of cognition on that factor to the exclusion
         | of other things. Even the engineer trying to solve the problem
         | was probably slowed in his investigation by such an appealingly
         | available issue being proposed first; again, I've certainly
         | experienced this in my own professional sphere where someone
         | proposes some explanation that ultimately turned out to be
         | completely spurious, and it takes actual effort to get both
         | myself and my team off of that line of thought.
        
         | PhasmaFelis wrote:
         | Is that what that's for? My Mini Cooper does the same,
         | sometimes. I assumed it was something to do with the engine
         | space being so small and cramped, so the fan had to continue
         | for a bit after shutdown to prevent residual heat from getting
         | to the electronics or something.
        
       | LanceH wrote:
       | My wife's car right now is low on windshield wiper fluid. It
       | warns us at a particular spot while we are driving. Not a
       | particular distance from home, a specific geolocation. First
       | thoughts were that it was the amount of time as she went to
       | something and came back. But it does the on screen and audible
       | warning at that location every time, no matter what was driven
       | before that, whether it was 5 minutes, 5 miles, an hour, or 60
       | miles. The only additional clue is that exact same spot is a dead
       | zone for most phones/carriers.
       | 
       | We got the wiper fluid filled, so the mystery is in remission,
       | but I'm wondering if all warnings will pop up right then. I'm
       | guessing it has something to do with the telemetry of the car
       | being nudged in that spot, waking up and saying something.
        
         | zackkitzmiller wrote:
         | Same exact thing with my wifes 2023 BMW. Exactly the same spot.
        
         | virogenesis wrote:
         | Experiencing this same issue acutually these days on a 2019 VW
         | Passat, it triggers when you accelerate or break or you are
         | doing a turn for a longer period. It's just the fluid being
         | moved around in the container. I think today I cleaned my
         | windshield for a bit just to make the car keep the low signal
         | light always on.
        
         | rsynnott wrote:
         | Hilly area? Is the car at a particular angle in that spot? :)
        
         | pphysch wrote:
         | Is there anything notable about the terrain at that point? A
         | sharp turn, bumpy road, etc.
        
           | oktwtf wrote:
           | My thoughts too. I would often induce a quick g-force to get
           | the last few drops out of the same fluid tank. I could see
           | the same triggering a sensor under similar circumstances.
        
           | LanceH wrote:
           | Long slow bend on completely flat road, 40mph. No braking or
           | acceleration for a quarter mile each direction.
           | 
           | The road is like that for miles with some lights, traffic
           | circles, etc... Only warnings in one spot.
           | 
           | I really didn't believe my wife, or thought maybe it was
           | happening a few times when she made a regular trip like
           | getting drive thru coffee and coming right back. But then we
           | ran a bunch of errands all afternoon and got one warning
           | there on the way out, and one warning on the way back.
        
             | wildzzz wrote:
             | Could be related to terrain a certain distance/time before
             | that spot in the road. The car may only trigger the warning
             | after the fluid level has stabilized which a flat road
             | would contribute to.
        
             | amluto wrote:
             | > Long slow bend
             | 
             | That's probably it.
             | 
             | If I were designing a wiper fluid warning, I would use some
             | sort of fluid level sensor and I would denounce it
             | aggressively: the indicator would only light up if the
             | sensor detected a low level for more than a couple seconds.
             | That way traffic circles, bumps, etc would not cause many
             | false positives. I might even couple it to some kind of
             | acceleration sensor so a warning would not turn on during
             | or shortly after any heavy vibration or acceleration.
             | 
             | A long slow bend would cause a prolonged, steady
             | centrifugal force and/or sideways acceleration due to a
             | banked road, which would defeat these mechanisms.
        
               | amluto wrote:
               | edit that's too late to edit: debounced, not denounced.
        
               | bbarn wrote:
               | The question then is does it only happen in one
               | direction? If the answer is yes, than I think you've
               | solved it. If the answer is no, it might still be the
               | problem but the sensor might be top or bottom mounted and
               | not side mounted from the center I suppose.
        
             | drivers99 wrote:
             | Is it a Subaru? Mine is currently doing that when I go
             | through a long turn in a highway interchange. I'm sure I
             | need to add fluid but it's on the edge where it only shows
             | up when the force of gravity is pulling the remaining fluid
             | a certain way.
        
             | s28l wrote:
             | Maybe it's a combination of the "bend" and the "long slow"
             | part.
             | 
             | If you are making a turn the centrifugal force will push
             | the fluid away from the axis of rotation. There is likely a
             | level sensor only on one side of the tank, so the turn
             | might push the fluid away from the sensor enough to trigger
             | a warning.
             | 
             | The sensor likely has a time component to avoid triggering
             | every time you make a turn, but if this bend is long
             | enough, maybe the fluid is displaced long enough that it
             | overcomes that minimum time.
        
             | thecosas wrote:
             | Perhaps it's long and slow enough to make the fluid move to
             | a certain point and stay there long enough for the
             | light/alarm to come on. If it's electronic vs solely
             | mechanical, I'm sure they've got some smarts so that
             | certain changes are ignored for a period of time
             | (incline/decline, sharp turns, short stops).
             | 
             | Maybe you found the sweet spot at a certain point in that
             | long, slow bend?
        
         | mavamaarten wrote:
         | I have a similar situation but in my case it's very obviously
         | the gentle bend in that location combined with the relatively
         | high speed that makes the fluid hug one side of the reservoir.
         | I'm pretty sure that the sensor is mounted to the opposite
         | side.
        
         | kybernetikos wrote:
         | Could be an incline is making the fluid level low at the sensor
         | point at that location. Does it have an unusual incline in any
         | axis?
        
           | LanceH wrote:
           | Absolutely flat. There is a mild bend there, but nothing
           | compared to corners and the traffic circle. For that matter,
           | we can get out and drive all afternoon and it said nothing
           | until that spot.
        
             | supergeek wrote:
             | A lot of those sensors average the reading over quite some
             | time to avoid false positives. It's possible that the last
             | few miles of road have just enough average slope or contain
             | just enough curves that the sensor averages "low" right at
             | that spot with the speed of traffic.
        
         | ezfe wrote:
         | My Subaru warns me about the wiper fluid on highway exits
         | exclusively because of the speed and inclination changes
        
         | valbaca wrote:
         | Sounds like an area with strong EM interference. Maybe a stop-
         | light with those underground sensors? or under a high-power
         | line? or near a power transfer station? or high-power radio
         | antennae?
         | 
         | Could be giving just enough weird EM interference to bump the
         | sensor from "enough fluid" to "low"
         | 
         | (I know I sound like Scully from x-files but could just be?)
        
       | rafaquintanilha wrote:
       | Funny thing the first time I heard this anecdote was by a priest
       | (he was formerly an electrical engineer). The conclusion was
       | similar: how many times a seemingly illogical issue has a very
       | logic explanation (even if it looks illogical to you at first).
        
       | jansan wrote:
       | When I was a student of mechanical engineering many years ago I
       | was very lucky to do an internship at a major car supplier in
       | Japan. We did the engine application for a car on the Chinese
       | market and being unexperienced as I was, I was more of a burden
       | than help to the engineer who I was assigned to.
       | 
       | However, when driving around with our test car, from time to time
       | the engine stalled, or stalled an restarted. This seemed to
       | appear randomly, and since the engineer was busy with doing the
       | engine application, he asked me if I could try to take care of
       | the issue.
       | 
       | I noticed that the problem occured only during rain, then I
       | noticed that it only occured when the windscreen wiper was set to
       | interval. With some help from engineers from the main office, I
       | was able to find the relais controlling the interval mode for the
       | windscreen wiper as the root cause. I was sending voltage spikes
       | into the cable tree, causing a reset in the central control unit.
       | A decision was made to change the supplier for the relais (this
       | was not supplied by our company), and the problem disappeared and
       | never occured again. Everybody was happy and I felt really proud
       | that I was actually able to contribute to the success of the
       | project.
        
       | Lolaccount wrote:
       | For some nostalgia, go to the root ...
       | 
       | https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~wkw/
       | 
       | Took me straight back to University ...
        
         | aidenn0 wrote:
         | Even the author's ICQ number is listed...
        
       | andsoitis wrote:
       | Debugging is an under appreciated art/skill.
        
       | ReactiveJelly wrote:
       | Appreciate it, I'd been looking passively for this story for a
       | year or two. I thought I heard it as a Car Talk puzzler, but it
       | was probably this page.
        
       | dwighttk wrote:
       | How was that car the only one to have vapor lock?
       | 
       | How was that the only occasion he tried to start his car that
       | quickly after shutting it down?
       | 
       | Why did the family always buy ice cream by itself?
        
       | PhasmaFelis wrote:
       | I read a story about a university IT guy with a professor
       | complaining that he couldn't access any websites hosted more than
       | 100 miles away. (Or thereabouts, I forget the exact numbers.)
       | Which is obviously nonsense; computers don't know "miles", only
       | network relays.
       | 
       | Long story short, an idle timeout variable had been set to 0
       | milliseconds, so any connection that took 1+ ms failed, so you
       | could only connect to systems within 0.5 light-milliseconds of
       | the university, which is about 100 miles.
        
         | kfarr wrote:
         | Related https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37576633
        
           | rawling wrote:
           | And we've come full circle, since I presume OP found this
           | article linked from the comments on that one.
        
             | PhasmaFelis wrote:
             | I'd actually read the story years and years ago, thus the
             | poorly-remembered details. Total coincidence that it was
             | posted here today. Unless someone here read one article and
             | was inspired to post the other :)
        
               | rawling wrote:
               | Oh yeah, I didn't mean you!
        
       | rsynnott wrote:
       | > Vanilla, being the most popular flavor, was in a separate case
       | at the front of the store for quick pickup.
       | 
       | This feels very contrived; who organises a supermarket like that?
       | "Where's the ice-cream?" "Which flavour? We keep them separately,
       | to make an anecdote work."
       | 
       | (Like, the moral of the story still works, but the specifics feel
       | very dubious...)
        
         | zie wrote:
         | Lots of stores have end-cap coolers which have product they
         | really want to sell in there, usually at a discount.
         | 
         | I could def. see Vanilla Ice Cream being in that container for
         | a while for whatever reason.
         | 
         | Or it could be a small/local grocery store and the
         | owner/manager really likes Vanilla, and did it for their own
         | convenience.
        
         | valbaca wrote:
         | But I guess that would make the timing part be obvious and kind
         | of ruin the "fun" of the story. Though I fully agree, the
         | difference between "front of store" and "back of store"
         | icecream couldn't be that much and also doesn't make much
         | sense.
         | 
         | Or I could imagine something like a Sonic drive-through, where
         | you often pull up in to a slot and turn off your car, but only
         | until your order gets brought to you by a bellhop:
         | 
         | - works when I order a burger (burger takes a few minutes to
         | cook)
         | 
         | - doesn't work when I order a hot dog (those are hot and ready
         | to go)
         | 
         | or something like, works when I order a chili dog (because they
         | have to heat up the chili)
        
           | rsynnott wrote:
           | > Or I could imagine something like a Sonic drive-through,
           | where you often pull up in to a slot and turn off your car,
           | but only until your order gets brought to you by a bellhop
           | 
           | .... Wait, that's still a thing? Not American, and my visits
           | there have only been to urban areas, but I had kind of
           | assumed that this was something present in films from the
           | 1960s, not, like, 2023.
        
         | Ekaros wrote:
         | Could be also that it was certain large shipment they wanted to
         | get rid off. My local hypermarket does have freezer sometimes
         | with icecream next to check out lanes with lot off other stock
         | they want to get rid off.
        
         | saalweachter wrote:
         | Hell, I'm skeptical vanilla is the most popular flavor,
         | although that may change by year.
         | 
         | At the very least, chocolate is neck and neck and on the only
         | sales chart I could find (which I think was for the UK?)
         | chocolate sold more than vanilla.
        
       | ot1138 wrote:
       | I intentionally caused a problem like this for a co-worker in
       | 1996.
       | 
       | He was a flamboyant character and had a habit of talking loudly
       | on the phone for an hour or so a day. I modified his mouse driver
       | to give me remote control on demand and installed it when he was
       | away from his computer.
       | 
       | For the next few weeks, I would wait for his daily call and
       | gradually move his mouse as he was trying to use his computer. He
       | was visibly frustrated and eventually caught me when he went on a
       | rampage during his conversation and he caught me laughing.
        
       | QuiDortDine wrote:
       | Simpler but funny tech support anecdote: at some point, someone
       | called me over and said their keyboard would print the letter 'e'
       | repeatedly. I tried another keyboard of course, and it still did
       | it! Rebooted the computer, still 'e's all over.
       | 
       | Finally, I looked at her mouse: it was half of a wireless mouse-
       | keyboard combo. Turns out, the keyboard hadn't been turned off
       | before it went in the pile, and other keyboards on top of it were
       | pressing its keys, or rather just the one key.
        
         | ajmurmann wrote:
         | Bluetooth devices are the worst for this. I had a very similar
         | case where the letter "z" would randomly be pressed. Same case
         | of random Bluetooth keyboard in a pile. More obnoxious though
         | was a Apple Mouse that kept trying to connect to one of our
         | work stations. It over and over would pop up a dialog saying
         | the mouse wants to connect. It would happen usually in the
         | morning and last a few minutes during which you in essence
         | couldn't work. There was no way in macOS to have it remember
         | the decision to not connect. When we tried to just pair with it
         | too get rid of the dialog it would fail. We never solved this
         | one. It just stopped happening one day.
        
       | dang wrote:
       | One past thread. Others?
       | 
       |  _Car allergic to vanilla ice cream (2000)_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13347852 - Jan 2017 (133
       | comments)
        
       | tornato7 wrote:
       | I was trying to fix the flaky Bluetooth connectivity on my
       | Subaru. There was one post on the forums that said "Just slam the
       | glove compartment closed really hard."
       | 
       | Knowing that this was bullshit, I tried everything else to no
       | avail. I finally caved and slammed the glove compartment. To my
       | surprise, Bluetooth has been solid ever since...
        
         | kumarvvr wrote:
         | I wonder how this was discovered in the first place !
        
       | NotYourLawyer wrote:
       | The president of Pontiac got involved? An engineer spent multiple
       | days on the problem?
       | 
       | X doubt
        
         | Aurornis wrote:
         | It's an engineering allegory, not a literal historic account.
         | You're supposed to learn from the engineer who diligently takes
         | notes until they discover the obscure correlation that clues
         | them in to the real problem. The true problem is not always
         | what we assume it to be, but you can't dismiss the existence of
         | a problem because it seems unlikely.
         | 
         | The included details of the narrative are deliberately fanciful
         | to make it obvious that it's not intended to be taken
         | literally.
         | 
         | Of all the details people are trying to pick apart, I'm
         | surprised nobody mentioned how strange it was that they drove
         | to the store every single night for ice cream rather than just
         | buying a few large containers and putting them in the freezer.
         | :)
        
           | mondobe wrote:
           | It's a law in my family that no matter how many containers of
           | ice cream we buy - or how large - they will always get eaten
           | in the next 24 hours. So we end up doing the same thing
           | (though not every day).
        
         | mempko wrote:
         | I once sent a message via linkedin to a VP of an error I was
         | getting on their company's website. He answered and had one guy
         | on their team to look into it. They fixed it the next day.
         | Sometimes people answer their messages!
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | lkbm wrote:
         | Some versions say it's the dealership, not the manufacturer,
         | being contacted, which seems more probable.[0] (It's also from
         | the 70s, which also helps it be a little more believable, imo.)
         | 
         | [0] https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cone-of-silence/
        
         | thefourthchime wrote:
         | I agree it seems unlikely, but it's still a fun story.
        
         | localhost wrote:
         | Many years ago I was at a small group meeting with Terry
         | Myerson who ran the Windows phone org and had just assumed
         | responsibility of the entire Windows org. I had a Nokia 1520
         | (the giant phone) and he asked me what I thought of it. I said
         | I loved it, and then complained about how it kept on dropping
         | bluetooth with my car's head unit, a new Subaru STi.
         | 
         | The next day there was an engineer sitting in the back of my
         | car with a bunch of test devices capturing traces of the BT
         | comms with the head unit. Apparently Subaru didn't sell enough
         | units to warrant its own certification process for BT so this
         | was the first time engineers had looked at it. IIRC it did get
         | better a few updates later; it was maddeningly unusable out of
         | the box.
        
         | Twirrim wrote:
         | It does happen, sometimes. Sometimes it's a case of who you
         | know.
         | 
         | When I was at Amazon, Jeff sent out a question-mark email after
         | a complaint from a customer, something he used to do when a
         | direct email complaint caught his attention in some particular
         | way. The complaint was that some amazon hardware was having
         | difficulty with this customers wifi network. I want to say it
         | was a 1st gen Echo, but it has been close to a decade since,
         | and I only saw the report that was produced from the situation,
         | that I honestly forget the particulars.
         | 
         | That question mark email ended up with Amazon sending some
         | senior engineers around to go figure out what was going on at
         | the customer's home, and figure out what that meant for the
         | device and how it might be mitigated. It ended up being some
         | weird combination of physical properties of the house, the wifi
         | arrangement, and some suboptimal behaviour in the Amazon device
         | that was fixed via a subsequent software update.
        
         | t3rabytes wrote:
         | Ford has been known to send corp engineers to dealerships to
         | help diagnose and resolve recurring issues in specific vehicles
         | (has happened to a coworker of mine, and the engineer did end
         | up fixing the issue!) -- I wouldn't entirely doubt.
        
           | wizerdrobe wrote:
           | My mother has a Jeep Patriot with a water leak where it kept
           | getting into the ceiling lights, drip on the interior, or on
           | the driver even.
           | 
           | After 3 or 4 trips across the county to the dealership she
           | threatened to invoke the Lemon Law on the new vehicle and
           | wouldn't you know it, Jeep sent out an engineer to Beaufort,
           | SC and he spent a week on this vehicle. Was fixed and never
           | had a leak again.
        
         | toast0 wrote:
         | Sending mail to the President doesn't mean it was handled by
         | the President. They've got a staff to handle customer service
         | requests.
        
       | deelowe wrote:
       | Reminds me of a short book I like that talks about these sort of
       | tings titled "An Engineer's Guide to Solving Problems." It starts
       | with a similar situation - "The Dog Barks When the Phone Rings."
       | Eventually, you get to a section called "If I Could See it, I
       | Could Fix it!" which discusses the importance of understanding
       | the problem before attempting fixes.
        
         | rmnclmnt wrote:
         | Understanding the problem usually comes later, first step is to
         | be able to reproduce the problem!
        
           | deelowe wrote:
           | Correct. That chapter actually might be more about
           | reproducibility. It's been a while since I read it.
        
         | m463 wrote:
         | > "The Dog Barks When the Phone Rings."
         | 
         | Went to a friend's house years ago, and knocked on the front
         | door. Loud running, then BOOM door moves as dog jumps up onto
         | other side. After some finagling, my friend finally gets the
         | door open and says "Use the doorbell next time, he hasn't
         | figured it out"
        
         | NikkiA wrote:
         | Let me guess, the dog is chained to a metal post, the metal
         | post happened to splice the telephone line buried in the
         | garden, and the dog was getting 100V of ring voltage every
         | time.
        
       | aaronax wrote:
       | How about a bunch of iPhones in a medical facility being disabled
       | because of some amount of helium being leaked when they were
       | charging the MRI machine?
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18340693
        
       | cmorrow415 wrote:
       | I used to have wireless infrared headphones. Sometimes, the audio
       | would go crazy, but only in a certain area of my office. As it
       | turns out, the IR blaster on my TV was interfering with the
       | signals. It was really interesting to hear the clicks of data
       | being sent over IR, though.
        
       | azinman2 wrote:
       | The most incredible part is that you could write a letter to an
       | auto manufacturer and they would send an engineer to your home.
        
       | Dork1234 wrote:
       | Since 2000 we they have publicly disclosed Janet Jackson crashing
       | harddrives:
       | 
       | https://www.billboard.com/music/pop/janet-jackson-rhythm-nat...
       | 
       | and moving a controller crashes the PS1.
       | 
       | https://www.gamedeveloper.com/programming/my-hardest-bug-eve...
       | 
       | Makes me thinks there are tons of these issues out there.
        
       | FrustratedMonky wrote:
       | As an old engineer. Stories like this are great to teach new
       | engineers never to ignore information. Take in all the crazy
       | information people say, or things they think are happening. It is
       | all valuable.
        
       | c7DJTLrn wrote:
       | Can you imagine an engineer turning up to your house to solve a
       | problem with your car these days? Manufacturers now would just
       | tell you to buy a new one.
        
       | kup0 wrote:
       | This reminds me of the "my monitor blinks every time I sit down
       | in my office chair" turning out to be EMI spikes from the gas
       | lift affecting the signal traveling on monitor cables.
       | 
       | A DisplayLink KB article even mentions it (and the associated
       | white paper about the issue), stating:
       | 
       |  _Surprisingly, we have also seen this issue connected to gas
       | lift office chairs. When people stand or sit on gas lift chairs,
       | they can generate an EMI spike which is picked up on the video
       | cables, causing a loss of sync. If you have users complaining
       | about displays randomly flickering it could actually be connected
       | to people sitting on gas lift chairs. Again swapping video
       | cables, especially for ones with magnetic ferrite ring on the
       | cable, can eliminate this problem. There is even a white paper
       | about this issue._
        
         | valbaca wrote:
         | got a link to the whitepaper? or name?
        
           | kup0 wrote:
           | woops, yeah I should have linked the DisplayLink article and
           | whitepaper both probably, was just going quickly
           | 
           | DisplayLink Article: https://support.displaylink.com/knowledg
           | ebase/articles/73861...
           | 
           | Direct whitepaper link (warning: PDF):
           | http://www.emcesd.com/pdf/eos93.pdf - if people prefer to
           | search themselves and not use my direct PDF link - it is
           | entitled "A New Type of Furniture ESD and Its Implications"
           | by Douglas C. Smith, from 1993
        
             | valbaca wrote:
             | much appreciated!
        
         | fomine3 wrote:
         | Exact same case happens for me except my chair doesn't have gas
         | lift. It's weird.
        
         | sitharus wrote:
         | This actually happened to one of my colleagues a few years
         | back! Except it was someone in the next row over sitting down
         | causing his monitor to turn off. Took them ages to figure it
         | out.
        
       | tboerstad wrote:
       | I was debugging a Heisenbug once, developing embedded FW for a
       | mobile phone.
       | 
       | After some time, I noticed that the phone seemingly only crashed
       | in one area of the open office floorplan where I was working.
       | 
       | I started walking around the office testing this theory, not
       | really believing it. But after a while, I had hard evidence that
       | the bug would only manifest once I entered that part of the
       | office.
       | 
       | When I came to terms that I wasn't hallucinating, I realised what
       | the problem was. There was poor reception in that part of the
       | office, causing the phone's modem to switch from 4G wideband to
       | narrowband (glossing over details here), which triggered the bug.
       | 
       | Easy to see with hindsight, but I was very confused there and
       | then
        
       | raajg wrote:
       | Have you noticed that in the last few months, Github goes down
       | every Tuesday?
        
       | janc_ wrote:
       | Reminds me of that bug where people couldn't print on
       | tuesdays....
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8171956
        
       | kamel3d wrote:
       | Why they have those posts as text file?
        
       | dghughes wrote:
       | I had a Dodge truck with a similar problem but it was never
       | resolved. If I went to an ATM or convenience store on a muggy day
       | when I left my truck transmission stuck in 1st gear. It was
       | obviously the short time stopped and start up again but no clue
       | why. The dealership looked a few times even taking it for a drive
       | with a test tool but nothing happened. It did it until I sold the
       | truck for about 17 years.
        
       | hobomatic wrote:
       | This reminds me of a strange recurring experience I used to have
       | with electronics in my house.
       | 
       | In that house,on certain days of the week at midnight, something
       | that sounded like recordings of political speeches from WW2 would
       | be audibly (but faintly so) from all of stationary electronics.
       | It was so faint, that it was usually hard to pinpoint any one
       | source, and the words used weren't understandable, so it usually
       | sounded like it was coming from everywhere all at once, and like
       | it was an old recording.
       | 
       | This would happen even if they were unplugged. Even if my power
       | went out.
       | 
       | I though I was either going crazy, or my house was literally
       | haunted by hitlers ghost.
       | 
       | Well one day I was in my car and recognized something on the
       | radio that reminded me of this spooky problem I had.
       | 
       | It was the signon of a Catholic am radio station that opened up
       | with Gregorian chanting, and a sermon. This signon happened at
       | the same time on the same days of every week.
       | 
       | Turns out, the wiring in that house was somehow functioning as an
       | am radio receiver, and some common components would vibrate out
       | the audio encoded in the radio signal.
        
         | Arrath wrote:
         | That is amazing. I would have been putting salt barriers around
         | my windows, jeez.
        
         | osrec wrote:
         | Lol, that would be terrifying, especially if you lived alone!
        
         | guyzero wrote:
         | AM radio is a terrible transmission format in many ways but
         | it's good because as you note it's extremely easy to decode
         | into sound!
        
           | margalabargala wrote:
           | AM radio receivers are so easy to make that they scare people
           | who make them accidentally!
           | 
           | A pair of old not-plugged-in computer speakers can also be an
           | AM radio receiver.
        
         | kyleee wrote:
         | Jesus works in mysterious ways
        
           | cosmojg wrote:
           | > I speak with the Comcast attorney about my call to State's
           | Attorney's office. She says she was unaware that State's
           | Attorney has denied the request to drop the charges, and that
           | she will write another letter to ensure that the situation is
           | taken care of. She also asks about whether the video trap has
           | been installed and is working correctly. I tell her that
           | everything is blocked except for 2 religious channels, 1
           | Spanish language channel, and the video portion of E! TV. She
           | says something along the lines of, "I guess the signal of the
           | Lord manages to find its way through somehow."
           | 
           | Source: http://telecom.csail.mit.edu/judy-sammel.html
        
         | donatj wrote:
         | Near my work, there is a roughly 25 foot stretch of road in
         | front of a factory where seemingly every FM station is
         | overpowered by Muzak. I don't know what the heck is going on in
         | this factory but I have seriously considered contacting the
         | FCC.
        
       | _drimzy wrote:
       | Ah, reminds of my first car. I got a new Corolla and went on my
       | merry way. But on the third day I found the steering stuck and
       | extremely hard to maneuver. Scared the heck out of me, so I went
       | back to the dealership. They inspected the car and informed me
       | the next day that there was nothing wrong with it and asked me to
       | pick it up. I drive out of the parking lot, and again the
       | steering gets stuck, and I just circle around and give them the
       | car back, showing the live problem. They inspect it another day,
       | and aren't able to find anything wrong, and ask me to pick it
       | back up. Sure enough, I haven't even gotten to my home yet and
       | the problem reappears, so I drive it back to the dealership. This
       | time they open up the car, the steering wheel and changed
       | somethings in it and asked me to pick the car back up. Took me 4
       | mins of driving to land back in the same problem after which I
       | made them refund my money.
       | 
       | I decided to shelve a few extra bucks and purchased a Camry from
       | the same dealership. The second day while I was parking my new
       | Camry, I found the same issue of the steering wheel getting stuck
       | all over again, with this new car. So this was surely a me-
       | problem, and not the car problem. After some analysis I relaized
       | that I was turning off the car at red lights, without shifting to
       | park. So when I turned it back on, the steering would lock
       | itself. But if I shifted to park first then it would work
       | perfectly!
        
       | bandyaboot wrote:
       | Engineer's notes: (resolution) recommended customer park at back
       | of lot and purchases ice cream in larger quantities.
        
       | MobileVet wrote:
       | Like all prefunded startups we rented a crappy apt to work out
       | of. Outside of the neighboring fire station which woke us at all
       | hours, everything worked fine.
       | 
       | A month into summer, the internet started to die at around 1pm...
       | then magically restore itself in the early evening before the
       | tech would arrive. This went on for a solid week or more.
       | 
       | Eventually the provider agreed to send a tech immediately after
       | we called. On first inspection, everything looked good.
       | Thankfully he was diligent and found that an old pin based IC was
       | likely expanding in the heat and every so slightly unseating
       | itself in its socket. Properly seating it and adding some hot
       | glue solved the issue.
       | 
       | Never underestimate heat dissipation in product design.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | ohthehugemanate wrote:
       | I had a single user whose machine would have intermittent
       | disconnections while compiling his codebase. Not every time, but
       | some of the time and every day, at that. This was back in the day
       | when compiling the linux kernel was a 1hr+ task.
       | 
       | The key piece of evidence was when we moved a printer into his
       | office, and it had the same disconnects, at the same times. Every
       | day around midday. Not one disconnection, mind you - starting at
       | about 11 the disconnects would get more and more frequent. From
       | noon to one it was every few minutes. In the afternoon and
       | evening it was just fine. It just so happened that the engineer
       | would work in the morning, and his first compiles if the day were
       | around that time. So, compiles were a red herring.
       | 
       | In the end the problem was the kitchen one floor down from his
       | office, where a microwave was heating up peoples' lunches and
       | causing enough EMI to disrupt (in those days rather brittle)
       | wifi. We bought them a new microwave, and the disconnects
       | stopped.
        
       | demondemidi wrote:
       | Fabricated anecdotes like this miss the point: debug is a multi-
       | layer approach, not a think-it-through logic puzzle. In reality,
       | the driver would have encountered vapor lock in multiple
       | situations, not just shopping, and as a result I think this
       | example does more damage than good by promoting a furrowed-brow
       | approach.
        
       | mike_ivanov wrote:
       | Hold my beer. I once had a fairly large CRT monitor which most of
       | the time worked fine, but sometimes would show a warped,
       | distorted image. After a while I noticed that warping was
       | happening only on rainy days. I opened the case and discovered
       | gooey stuff smelling cat urine on the monitor's electronics.
       | Washing it with pure alcohol solved the problem. I have no idea
       | what was going on there, but I consider my cat was an extremely
       | lucky dude as I almost never turned that monitor completely off.
        
         | monitron wrote:
         | Before you blame your cat, consider the possibility of an
         | exploded electrolytic capacitor. Among many other foul
         | comparisons, I've heard people say they can smell like cat pee
         | after they die.
        
       | The28thDuck wrote:
       | What genre of story is this? I love these tales.
        
         | teddyh wrote:
         | It's an urban legend.
        
       | SleekEagle wrote:
       | This reminds me of the case of the 500 mile email:
       | 
       | https://www.ibiblio.org/harris/500milemail.html
        
         | notwhereyouare wrote:
         | probably why this was posted:
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37576633 the 500 mile
         | email was just posted yesterday
        
       | CamperBob2 wrote:
       | Yeah, that isn't how this works. Popular things are closer to the
       | back of the grocery store -- milk, eggs, meat, produce, higher-
       | volume soft drinks -- in order to force you to walk past
       | everything else to reach them.
       | 
       | Ice cream is not that popular, so it could reasonably be stocked
       | near the front of the store. But all the flavors are stored
       | together, as you'd expect.
       | 
       | Engineers who make house calls are also not a thing in Detroit.
       | You _might_ see that happen in Japan, where airline CEOs have
       | been known to make pilgrimages to call on the families of crash
       | victims. But I 'd be (pleasantly) surprised if the car companies
       | have ever done anything like that.
        
         | tptacek wrote:
         | People say this a lot. I think it's mostly not true.
         | 
         | Milk and eggs are at the back of the store because they're
         | high-turnover items that require refrigeration. In literally
         | every grocery store in my area --- Pete's, Whole Foods,
         | Caputo's, and Jewel --- produce and high-volume soft drinks are
         | both in the front of the store; in fact, the major soft drinks
         | are stocked _outside_ the store at Pete 's, in the vestibule
         | where the shopping carts are.
         | 
         | In no grocery store I have ever been in have the bulk of the
         | milk and eggs been in the front of the store, despite the fact
         | that stores compete with each other, and are a low-margin
         | business.
         | 
         | Grocery store layouts are certainly optimized. But I don't
         | think the "milk and eggs are hidden so you'll buy snacks"
         | narrative makes much sense. The stores are loaded from the
         | back, and easiest to refrigerate from the back, and having
         | clerks constantly trucking milk from one refrigerator in the
         | back to another in the front of the store seems pretty
         | suboptimal. I think dairy placement is a constraint the stores
         | work around, not an evil scheme.
        
         | jcranmer wrote:
         | > Popular things are closer to the back of the grocery store --
         | milk, eggs, meat, produce, higher-volume soft drinks -- in
         | order to force you to walk past everything else to reach them.
         | 
         | > Ice cream is not that popular, so it could reasonably be
         | stocked near the front of the store. But all the flavors are
         | stored together, as you'd expect.
         | 
         | This part is actually more plausible than you'd expect,
         | especially if you assume that details are slightly garbled by
         | the N'th retelling.
         | 
         | Last year, we went to a convenience store to pick up some ice
         | cream treats after a big hike. There was one of those mini
         | freezers with a set of frozen treats right next to the
         | entrance, facing the cashier. But there was also a line of
         | full-sized freezers containing all the usual frozen goods
         | (including frozen ice cream treats) in one of the aisles.
         | Depending on which frozen treat you wanted, you'd either be
         | picking it right up by the front door, or having to wander down
         | an aisle to find it.
        
           | CamperBob2 wrote:
           | Yep, same with the grocery stores around here, they all have
           | last-minute snacks and drinks at the checkout stands.
           | 
           | Ice cream tends to be somewhere close to the middle of the
           | store. But if you're after staple foods in larger-than-snack-
           | size quantities, you'll be doing some walking.
        
       | 14 wrote:
       | What is most incredible about this story is that the president
       | heard about the story himself and that an engineer was sent to
       | investigate. Now days if a car has problems under warranty it is
       | often assumed the driver is at fault and of course problems never
       | happen when you are showing the mechanic.
        
       | vishnugupta wrote:
       | After 500 miles email story y'day now this.
       | 
       | https://web.mit.edu/jemorris/humor/500-miles
        
       | biermic wrote:
       | And Iphones are allergic to Helium
       | https://www.ifixit.com/News/11986/iphones-are-allergic-to-he...
        
       | dylan604 wrote:
       | These are the kinds of stories that made Car Talk so much fun. It
       | was so much more than just hearing about mechanics repairing
       | cars. It was the fact that the situations were so odd and unusual
       | that the stories were interesting. It was also fun hearing how
       | these mechanics had been around so long and seen so many of these
       | unusual situations that they became normal to them. It didn't
       | hurt that they were good story tellers
        
         | m463 wrote:
         | "Go to your mechanic and find the oldest guy in the shop. He
         | might be able to work on a carburetor."
        
           | genewitch wrote:
           | these days it's "just buy a new carburetor" - i remember
           | rebuilding a few like 20 years ago - on small engines, but
           | now a rebuild kit is, say, $12 and a new carburetor is $20.
           | For an extra $8 you only have to remove two bolts and fasten
           | the new one in, rather than take a carburetor apart and
           | replace gaskets and floats (or whatever, it's been 20 years).
           | 
           | word to the wise - never use the shutoff switch on anything
           | with a carburetor - use the fuel shutoff valve. This prevents
           | gasoline from varnishing your carburetor bowl.
           | 
           | I probably won't use that word again for a year, now,
           | heavens.
        
             | c0nsumer wrote:
             | I acquired a generator from a family member, and unknown to
             | me when I needed it to power the house the thing wouldn't
             | run unless the choke was held closed with a wire tie. You
             | can imagine how well that ran...
             | 
             | So, that sounds like a carb rebuild, right? Come to find
             | out that for about $17 shipped a seller on eBay with
             | something like 200K feedback will sell me a brand new carb.
             | Fitted that, it starts on first pull. There's absolutely no
             | reason to mess around with a rebuild on something like
             | that.
        
               | BenjiWiebe wrote:
               | As a small engine mechanic, you you lucky. Usually those
               | cheap carburetors will do the job, and usually the engine
               | won't run quite as smooth. The rest of the times it's so
               | erratic you have to buy an OEM one.
               | 
               | I will always clean/rebuild carburetors before replacing.
               | And usually when replacing I will explain to the customer
               | and get permission to spend their money on an OEM one.
        
               | c0nsumer wrote:
               | Thanks, that's good to know. This is a basic, older
               | Generac GP5500 and I couldn't figure out how to get the
               | carb apart, it really seemed pressed together. Maybe that
               | generator already had it's replaced, as the replacement I
               | got looked identical.
               | 
               | Looks like the OEM part is only $50-some, so worst case
               | I'll get one of those down the line, but the generator
               | was running at a friend's house for three days straight a
               | few weeks back and no issue, so hopefully it'll keep
               | being good.
        
           | grecy wrote:
           | > _He might be able to work on a carburetor_
           | 
           | I'm absolutely a car guy, and I'm 41 years old.
           | 
           | Strangely enough, I've never owned a carburettored engine,
           | and it seems unlikely I ever will (except, maybe, for a
           | chainsaw)
        
             | wink wrote:
             | I sat in one when it started burning on the highway,
             | because of the carburetor :D
             | 
             | I think it was a Renault 11 and I'm not exactly sure how
             | old I was, probably a bit before I got my license, so late
             | 90s.
        
             | m463 wrote:
             | I suspect a common reason would be for a classic car or
             | motorcycle.
        
               | nimish wrote:
               | Or general aviation since they use engines derived from
               | ancient automotive designs. Fuel injection isn't common.
        
               | grecy wrote:
               | I consider the OG S2000 a classic car :)
        
           | dataveg wrote:
           | I liked their advice - "go to the auto store and buy a bottle
           | of something with 'miracle' in the name."
        
       | teddyh wrote:
       | We're doing straight up urban legends now? Flagged.
        
       | MaikaDiHaika wrote:
       | What's an interesting story, but hey, he also got free ice cream.
        
       | bluesmoon wrote:
       | Reminds me of the 500 mile email (2002):
       | https://www.ibiblio.org/harris/500milemail.html
        
         | dredmorbius wrote:
         | Which was discussed yesterday:
         | <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37576633>
         | 
         | (It's an HN perennial.)
        
       | jjbinx007 wrote:
       | We had a similar problem at work in the late 90s. A member of
       | staff reported that their mouse would stop working between
       | certain hours of the day. It had apparently been okay in the
       | morning, stopped working over lunchtime then started again later.
       | 
       | On some days it would work perfectly all day long, but on others
       | it would stop working between those hours.
       | 
       | The biggest clue was it would always work perfectly on overcast
       | days, but on sunny days this strange behaviour would manifest
       | again.
       | 
       | Turns out the problem was related to the mouse being a cheap
       | mouse. The case had very thin plastic.
       | 
       | The mouse was a ball mouse, and it worked by shining an LED into
       | a sensor on each of the X and Y axes. On sunny days the sun would
       | completely overpower the sensor due to the plastic case being
       | very thin and on overcast days it would not. On sunny days the
       | mouse would only work when the sun had moved around the sky to
       | cast a shadow over where the mouse was being used.
       | 
       | Perfectly logical but baffling at first.
        
         | aidos wrote:
         | This happened to me in my first job and it took me weeks to
         | figure it out. The penny dropped and I put tape around the thin
         | gap in the casing where the top joined to the bottom and it
         | fixed it immediately.
        
         | kqbx wrote:
         | Reminds me of a problem that I had (many years ago) with my
         | iPhone 4 - if I tried to boot it in a dark place, it would get
         | stuck on the Apple logo in an infinite boot loop.
         | 
         | Turns out some versions of the Pangu jailbreak for iOS 7.1.x
         | would crash during boot if the reading from the ambient light
         | sensor was below some threshold. To this day I don't know the
         | exact explanation of this bug, but it seems that Pangu included
         | some unnecessary code that messed with the light sensor [1].
         | 
         | If you don't believe me, there is a huge reddit thread[2] with
         | a lot of people confirming this.
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://www.reddit.com/r/jailbreak/comments/294wob/jailbreak...
         | [2] https://www.reddit.com/294wob/
        
           | chronicsonic wrote:
           | Engineers love problem solving. I always see it as a
           | challenge. No matter how unimportant.
        
           | saagarjha wrote:
           | Seems unlikely. I don't have access to the paste but from the
           | comment below it I think it's probably a false positive that
           | Pangu was doing something with the sensor. (Not that I don't
           | doubt that the sensor could be the problem, it's just that
           | the code is not very conclusive.)
        
         | asddubs wrote:
         | Another similar anecdote I heard before was related to a
         | wireless device, and some employees flying a drone during their
         | break, generating interference.
        
           | ethbr1 wrote:
           | My parents have some old Gateway amplified computer speakers.
           | Came with the 386!
           | 
           | They still work perfectly... except for a regular pop of
           | noise every few seconds that would intermittently show up,
           | that scaled with the volume setting.
           | 
           | It turned out, their portable phone (read: landline with
           | short-distance wireless RF handset) would ping from the base
           | station to the handset, if it were off the cradle, which was
           | being picked up by the unshielded line-level audio cable and
           | amplified.
           | 
           | Moved the base station further from the cable, pop
           | disappeared.
        
             | valbaca wrote:
             | Remember how old speakers would let you know if you were
             | about to get a cellphone call. It was like digital
             | precognition haha
        
               | genewitch wrote:
               | you can still hear cellphone and wifi noise in crappy
               | amplifiers - i have two sets of active muff hearing
               | protection - the ones with microphones on each earpiece,
               | and if you get inbetween a beamforming WAP or near any
               | wifi antenna, or near a cellphone, you get "brrz bz bz bz
               | bzzzzzz tiktiktiktiktik".
               | 
               | But this is different than the old <2g/edge phones, which
               | wouldn't interfere unless you were about to get a call -
               | because the tower said "where's _this phone_? " and your
               | phone would max out it's tx and say "here i am!" and
               | that's what you heard. This is probably incorrect, but
               | based on my observations this is what occurred.
               | 
               | Remember the doodads you could put on your startac style
               | phones on the antenna bit, with LEDs in them - they'd
               | light up when you were about to get a call, as well, by
               | design!
        
               | sgerenser wrote:
               | https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FYjs7vsaSEw&pp=ygU4U291bmQg
               | b2Y...
        
               | astrange wrote:
               | Speakers haven't really changed in 50-60 years, it's the
               | phones that changed there. If you got a call on 2G today
               | it'd still happen.
        
               | oaktowner wrote:
               | OMG had forgotten all about that.
        
           | HeyLaughingBoy wrote:
           | We did a lot of wireless (2.4GHz range) sensor development at
           | my last job. It was a rule of thumb to avoid any testing at
           | lunch time since the microwave generated so much
           | interference, everything would fail when someone wanted to
           | heat up their meal.
        
             | robocat wrote:
             | "Microwave oven to blame for mystery signal that left
             | astronomers stumped":
             | https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/may/05/microwave-
             | ov...
        
             | salawat wrote:
             | Ugh... Mom and the microwave were a scourge back in the
             | days of yore when I hosted servers for friends in various
             | games. I was hardwired into the router as "the keeper of
             | the hardware", but the wireless would just get schlocked
             | every time she heated up her coffee.
             | 
             | And Mom ran on coffee. Lotsa coffee. Sometimes I think she
             | just did it because she didn't hear enough complaints
             | coming out of the speakers.
             | 
             | I rejoiced the day that thing died. She's now got an even
             | beefier one, but it doesn't interfere on the 5ghz bands at
             | all, and I'm not testing the 2.4 out of respect to the
             | spirit of that ole menace.
        
         | ssl-3 wrote:
         | I have a similar stories.
         | 
         | The first was a VDSL connection I had at home. It worked great
         | (fast, for the time) except when it didn't. It always failed in
         | the evening. Techs would come out, bless it as being good, and
         | leave -- because of course it worked while they were there.
         | Unless they showed up and it was broken and then they'd declare
         | that it was an outside problem, and that they'd have to get
         | someone else to fix it (because the residential techs can't do
         | overhead work).
         | 
         | I made lots of (very polite) phone calls, which results in more
         | refunds and more service calls. More than once, my driveway and
         | the street in front of my house looked like an AT&T convention.
         | 
         | This went on for months.
         | 
         | I had direct numbers and emails for tier 3 support and the
         | local manager who oversaw this plant. We were all getting to
         | know eachother too well, and there were boots on the ground
         | addressing this problem as many as three times in week.
         | 
         | I eventually noticed that as the days got shorter so did the
         | evening outages...and that if it was a cloudy day, then that
         | day was often outage-free.
         | 
         | I had an epiphany: The problem might correlate with the angle
         | of the sun, and the duration of exposure!
         | 
         | I checked my logs and the past weather, and sure enough: It
         | lined up.
         | 
         | So I reported my findings, even though they seemed like
         | nonsense as the words came out of my mouth, and they sent out
         | some crazy-haired guy with bluejeans and an untucked shirt who
         | was clearly not used to wearing a uniform, and who was also
         | obviously not normally customer-facing.
         | 
         | "I know exactly why they can't find the problem," he said after
         | I reiterated what I'd learned. "Your neighborhood still has old
         | lead-sheathed overhead lines, and nobody knows how to work on
         | that anymore."
         | 
         | "But I'm certified on that. I'm going to go back to the shop,
         | pick up a bucket truck and get your line fixed. It will take me
         | most of a day to do this, but I will be back when I'm done."
         | 
         | And it was getting pretty late, but he did come back to let me
         | know that he found some things and fixed them. And I don't know
         | what those things were, but it was fine after that -- and it
         | stayed fine.
         | 
         | Thermal expansion letting cosmic rays leak into copper pairs
         | wrapped in paper, tar, and lead? Who knows. I certainly don't
         | know.
         | 
         | I've never encountered that stuff professionally (and it isn't
         | your grandfather's 25-pair cable) and as this dude said,
         | "nobody knows how to work on that anymore."
        
         | MalcolmDwyer wrote:
         | We have a countertop ice maker that gets jammed up and
         | overloaded with ice on sunny days for a similar reason.
         | 
         | There's an infrared beam and sensor. When the ice tray is full,
         | it is supposed to block the beam, and then the machine stops
         | making ice.
         | 
         | On a sunny day, there's enough bright light in our kitchen to
         | fool the sensor so it keeps making ice.
         | 
         | We have a random magazine that we put on top of it to make it
         | work correctly.
        
           | 13of40 wrote:
           | I had a VCR back in the day that refused to function if you
           | opened its case. It turned out that instead of using physical
           | switches inside it used pairs of lights and detectors that
           | would give false positive results when ambient light shined
           | on them.
        
             | aksss wrote:
             | as in an optocoupler? Those are the coolest, especially for
             | dealing with different voltages.
        
               | alexdbird wrote:
               | No, there's not any call for high voltages in a VCR,
               | outside the feedback loop of a SMPS if it's fancy. The
               | most common thing to use light sensors is just detecting
               | the difference between tape and clear leader at the ends
               | of the tape (or broken tape).
        
           | m463 wrote:
           | I have a garage door that will not close on sunny days.
           | 
           | Same sort of problem. The obstruction sensor at the bottom of
           | the door is confused by the strong sunlight and the door
           | stops closing part way and re-opens.
           | 
           | I've tried a toilet-paper tube around the sensor but that
           | isn't always successful. I really wish there was a laser
           | sensor to replace it with.
        
             | rainbowzootsuit wrote:
             | Depending on the orientation of your garage door,
             | exchanging the sensor could put it in an unaffected
             | position.
             | 
             | It looks like an industrial photoelectric sensor, including
             | laser based ones run around $100, so maybe that can be a
             | realistic swap.
             | 
             | https://www.automationdirect.com/adc/shopping/catalog/senso
             | r...
        
             | spoonjim wrote:
             | Very basic engineering would be to modulate the sender at a
             | specific frequency
        
             | kuroguro wrote:
             | The sad thing is there are certain IR wavelengths that are
             | a lot less affected by the sun and nobody bothered to check
             | for an outdoor product...
        
               | lotsofpulp wrote:
               | The garage door obstruction sensors are located inside
               | the garage, so it technically might be an indoor product.
               | 
               | Although, the possibility of a garage being oriented such
               | that the sunlight would directly hit the sensors while
               | the garage door is open seems like it could be a not
               | infrequent occurrence.
        
             | djmips wrote:
             | Maybe experiment with filters.
             | 
             | Also it could be 'fun' to swap out the LEDs?
        
             | sharadov wrote:
             | Similar problem toilet-paper hack worked.
        
             | geocar wrote:
             | Paint your garage floor black: less light will reflect.
             | 
             | It also is a lot easier to see fallen bolts and shit on a
             | black floor than on a white/gray one.
        
             | giraffe333 wrote:
             | I have this exact problem and (mostly) fixed it by swapping
             | the sensor and transmitter. I just cut the wires and
             | spliced with electrical tape. Now the problem still happens
             | but only sometimes in the fall and spring when the sun's
             | angle is just right. This is with a west facing garage
             | about 41degN latitude USA.
             | 
             | But yeah, why this isn't laser based, or using a light
             | frequency that is less affected by sunlight? Probably cost,
             | or ignorance.
        
               | dharmab wrote:
               | It varies by brand- some brands are better at filtering
               | out sunlight than others. The home builder should know
               | not to use certain brands in garages that face the sun...
               | but they often don't.
               | 
               | It'a not laser based so the sensors don't have to be
               | perfectly aligned. Keeps your garage door working when
               | you kid knocks it with their foot.
        
             | tbyehl wrote:
             | What sucks is those sensors are designed so you can't just
             | jump a wire to permanently defeat them.
             | 
             | You can, however, tape the sender and receiver together.
        
             | dharmab wrote:
             | Is it a Genie system? My old Genie system had that exact
             | same problem. Even making large sun shields out of Amazon
             | boxes didn't fix it.
             | 
             | I had to replace my opener and door anyway and had a
             | conversation with a tech about it. We decided on a
             | LiftMaster in part because their sensors are very good at
             | dealing with sunlight.
        
         | unsupp0rted wrote:
         | I'm amazed an IT department would troubleshoot deeply enough to
         | figure out it was the thin plastic letting in interfering light
         | on sunny days.
         | 
         | I would have guessed they'd shrug at the first sign of trouble,
         | swap it out with a known-working mouse and mark the ticket
         | resolved... unless all the replacement mice were thin plastic
         | too, I suppose.
        
           | doubled112 wrote:
           | I can't leave something like that unexplained, and I've been
           | an IT department before.
           | 
           | It would bother me until I figured something out.
        
           | jacamera wrote:
           | I'm assuming it was a trackball mouse from the description.
           | The OP said it was cheap so I don't think cost was an issue
           | but from my experience some employees are very particular
           | about their peripherals (don't blame them one bit!). If
           | they're important enough (or maybe just nice enough) I could
           | absolutely imagine spending the time to make sure their
           | preferred device is working properly.
        
           | repiret wrote:
           | Mice used to be expensive enough to troubleshoot.
        
             | unsupp0rted wrote:
             | For myself, I can't remember a time when a mouse cost more
             | than an hour of an IT guy's time.
             | 
             | I suppose a good office-computer mouse in 1990 would cost
             | $100 ~ $200 (say $350 today). In that case, yes
             | troubleshooting it for a day would make sense, especially
             | if it's not an isolated problem.
        
               | thaumasiotes wrote:
               | > For myself, I can't remember a time when a mouse cost
               | more than an hour of an IT guy's time.
               | 
               | This is not a sensible comparison to make. Support staff
               | have a lot of free time. They have to, because they're
               | support staff -- if they were always busy, then whenever
               | a problem arose, it would be impossible to get support.
               | 
               | So to have the IT department playing with the mouse is
               | unlikely to cost the company anything. If something comes
               | in that's more important, the mouse problem will be put
               | aside. If they have nothing better to do, they can play
               | with the mouse.
        
         | geph2021 wrote:
         | reminds me of testing out a pinewood derby track in my backyard
         | for our cub scouts pack. It had an IR sensor that would detect
         | the cars at the finish line. When someone was standing next to
         | the finish line, it worked flawlessly. Otherwise, it was very
         | flaky and randomly would trigger without the cars trigger it. I
         | pretty quickly surmised it was interference from the direct
         | sunlight, so we put up a pop-up shade over it and it worked
         | flawlessly (without someone standing nearby, coincidentally
         | casting a shadow). The other dads were amazed that I figured it
         | out, but it's just one of those things you learn from
         | experience (and some background knowledge).
        
         | 98codes wrote:
         | I had a similar problem, but in the opposite direction. My
         | cable internet speeds at home were fairly good (for the US,
         | anyway), but sometimes would absolutely bottom out. Not dead,
         | just glacially slow. After troubleshooting everything under the
         | sun, I came to realize that the problems would happen not when
         | it was raining per se, but when it was heavily foggy or
         | misting. Normal to heavy rain was fine.
         | 
         | Called the cable company, tech came out. Everything inside was
         | fine, but the cable from the main line to the house had a tiny
         | cut in one spot, not enough to really affect the connection,
         | but enough for ambient moisture to work its way in and foul the
         | connection.
        
           | liotier wrote:
           | A customer's DSL connection dysfunctioned every evening
           | during December - but worked fine the rest of the year...
           | Culprit: interference from nearby Christmas decorations
           | leaking EM all over the place.
           | 
           | A customer's DSL connection dysfunction's frequency increased
           | mornings and evenings. Culprit: the lift's electric motor
           | leaking EM all over the place.
           | 
           | A bunch of DSL connections degrade when traffic increase...
           | Crosstalk in big cables of course !
           | 
           | The sort of fun incidents that take a good while to
           | troubleshoot... I'm glad we are migrating away from DSL to
           | fiber: either it works or not !
        
             | mschuster91 wrote:
             | It's not like fiber doesn't have its own weird failure
             | modes. Favourite one I heard was shoddy belowground work
             | while crossing a street. No problem with ordinary car
             | traffic, but heavy trash haul trucks could interrupt the
             | link.
        
               | orbital-decay wrote:
               | An ISP my friend worked at was having weird outages in
               | one area, and it turned out that they had an apartment
               | block built right in the way of their free-space optical
               | link. Surprisingly, it was fine at first because the link
               | went straight through it without obstructions, window to
               | window. But when they started to add window panes,
               | finishing the construction, the link became spotty, and
               | adding the doors blocked the signal completely.
        
               | mschuster91 wrote:
               | How does one even attempt to troubleshoot that, without
               | resorting to a questionably legal drone or chopper
               | flight?!
        
               | liotier wrote:
               | Line of sight, easy - just aim a sight and find that you
               | are seeing a building rather than the opposite device.
        
           | donalhunt wrote:
           | Common issue in Ireland for DSL customers. Damaged copper
           | cabling would leak water when it rained causing dropouts and
           | lower speeds. Telecom engineers would call out on days when
           | the copper had dried out and be unable to find any fault.
           | Turns out correlating such reports with weather reports is
           | hard. :/
        
             | fullspectrumdev wrote:
             | I'd suspected that, but kept it to myself because it
             | sounded a bit mad
        
           | jeiebx83 wrote:
           | I ran into a similar issue, except internet and phone would
           | get really bad on a cold morning.
           | 
           | Tech showed up around noon, saw I was indeed having a bad
           | connection, went and checked the signal at the junction box
           | for the street (can't remember what you call these) and
           | everything was normal there, so he closed it back up again
           | and double checks the signal at the house again, but it was
           | fine. He walks the lines to double check but everything
           | looked normal.
           | 
           | His best guess was that moisture was condensing ever so
           | slightly inside the junction box that morning, and was let
           | out as soon as he opened it at around noon, which fixed the
           | problem.
        
           | lxgr wrote:
           | Having had to debug many of such cable issues in the past,
           | it's baffling to me that cable companies aren't proactively
           | monitoring for things like this.
           | 
           | They have all the data available on their end, as far as I
           | can tell! (Unless DOCSIS modems somehow don't have a standard
           | "signal receive report" functionality?)
        
             | Animats wrote:
             | Telcos used to monitor their copper outside plant for
             | moisture. This was called Automatic Line Insulation Testing
             | in the Bell System. The ALIT system ran in the hours before
             | dawn. It would connect to each idle line, and apply, for
             | tens of milliseconds, about 400 volts limited to very low
             | current between the two wires, and between each wire and
             | ground, measuring the leakage current. This would detect
             | moisture in the cable. This was dealt with by hooking up a
             | tank of dry nitrogen to the cable to dry it out.
             | 
             | Here's a 1960s vintage Automatic Electric line insulation
             | test system at work in a step-by-step central ofice. [1]
             | Here's the manual for automatic line insulation testing in
             | a 5ESS switch.[2] 5ESS is still the major AT&T switch for
             | copper analog phone lines. After that, it's all packet
             | switching.
             | 
             | For fiber, of course, moisture doesn't affect the signal.
             | 
             | This led to an urban legend: "bell tap". While Western
             | Electric phones were designed to not react to the ALIT test
             | signal, many cheap phones would emit some sound from the
             | "ringer" when the 400V pulses came through, some time
             | before dawn.
             | 
             | [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wt1GGdDa5jQ
             | 
             | [2] https://www.manualslib.com/manual/2755956/Lucent-
             | Technologie...
        
               | ciabattabread wrote:
               | Ah, so that's why there were always nitrogen tanks on NYC
               | sidewalks.
        
               | doloputer wrote:
               | Yup, here's a tom scott video on the very same:
               | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juZqGU9iuq0
        
               | justsomehnguy wrote:
               | > Wait! Was that an old adding machine?
               | 
               | At 02:40.
               | 
               | And yes, it is an adding machine.
        
               | swores wrote:
               | Great comment, thanks!
               | 
               | (I've sent a quick email suggesting it be added to
               | https://news.ycombinator.com/highlights :)
        
               | Animats wrote:
               | If you're really into telephony history, the Internet
               | Archive has "The History Of Engineering and Science in
               | the Bell System" (3 volumes) online.
               | 
               | If you have to build reliable distributed systems, it's
               | worth understanding how this was done in the
               | electromechanical era of telephony, where the component
               | reliability was much worse than the system reliability.
               | "Number 5 Crossbar"[1] is worth reading, but hard to
               | follow if you have no idea how telephone switching worked
               | and are unfamiliar with the terminology.
               | 
               | Number 5 Crossbar, in current terms, was a collection of
               | microservices. There was a big, dumb switch fabric, and
               | "markers" which told it what to connect. Other
               | microservices included trunks, originating registers
               | (which listen to incoming dial digits), senders (which
               | sent dial digits to the next switch), billing punches
               | (which recorded toll call data for later billing),
               | translators (which held routing tables), and trouble
               | recorders (which logged errors.) Central offices had at
               | least two of each resource, for redundancy. Resources
               | were "seized" as needed from resource pools, with a
               | hardware timeout and alarms to prevent resource lockup.
               | If something went wrong in setting up a call, it was
               | retried once, using different resources. If it failed on
               | the second try, the caller got a fast busy and there was
               | an alarm and a trouble recorder dropped a trouble card.
               | Markers did not have persistent state. They started each
               | call with a reset. So they could not get stuck in a bad
               | state.
               | 
               | In the entire history of the Bell System, no
               | electromechanical switching office was ever down for more
               | than 30 minutes for any reason other than a natural
               | disaster or a fire. It's worth understanding how they did
               | that.
               | 
               | [1] https://telephoneworld.org/mdocs-
               | posts/number-5-crossbar-sys...
        
               | Aeolun wrote:
               | Not truly related to the post content, but there is
               | something about the way these old manuals are
               | formatted/printed that immediately inspires confidence in
               | the contents.
               | 
               | Maybe because you know that someone spent a lot of time
               | on it before it was published since no adjustments could
               | be made after the fact.
        
               | ColinWright wrote:
               | We still have a land line. When a call comes through the
               | phone often gives a gentle "peep", then a pause, then
               | goes full-on ring. I've started to react to the "peep".
               | 
               | But every evening, mostly around 21:00 or so, the phone
               | gives a gentle "peep" without then ringing.
               | 
               | I wonder if it's a line test?
        
               | Animats wrote:
               | Crap electronic ringer, probably. If you put a scope on
               | the line, you should be able to see what's happening.
               | Remember to be prepared for higher voltages, up to 400V.
               | 
               | There are various weird, obsolete signals in analog
               | phones. Ring pulse alerting signal. ALIT test. Polarity
               | reversal. Ring to ground. Ground start. Caller ID (1200
               | baud FSK between the first and second rings) DSL. Basic
               | talk and ring was standardized around 1900, and
               | everything else is backwards compatible. Ringers are
               | supposed to ignore all that stuff. People who implement
               | Asterisk PBXs are into this.
               | 
               | Here are some actual waveforms, if anybody cares.[1]
               | 
               | [1] http://www.adventinstruments.com/Products/AI-5120/Scr
               | eenshot...
        
             | yafbum wrote:
             | In my observation, to a first approximation, cable
             | operators take off-the-shelf equipment, connect it, power
             | it on, and bill customers for it. They don't really have
             | the r&d capability to innovate and create new monitoring
             | solutions quickly.
             | 
             | It might happen that an equipment manufacturer sees an
             | opportunity and builds something, but then they have to go
             | into a long sales cycles to convince operators to use it.
             | Operators are in a duopoly situation in most places, so
             | quality of service is kind of a secondary concern for them
             | - customers may get annoyed, but as long as the competition
             | is not vastly superior, few actually switch. It is not a
             | market prone to innovation.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | RHSeeger wrote:
           | I had a similar problem, due to an old line running to my
           | house; liquid getting in, etc. And when it acted up, I'd call
           | the cable company and be like "look, I can show you I'm
           | losing packets right now... I need you to run tests on your
           | end to confirm". And every time, they'd tell me they could
           | schedule a tech to come out and take a look at it. Only, I
           | couldn't "schedule" the problem to occur when the tech came
           | out.. so they'd come out, declare all was fine, and leave. It
           | was infuriating.
           | 
           | Eventually I called so many times and had so many
           | appointments, that the tech lead gave me his direct number
           | and told me to call him directly the next time it happened.
           | When it did, I did, and he ran some tests, and confirmed
           | there was a problem. I don't know that we ever got it sorted
           | out (it was a while ago), but just getting them to agree
           | there was an issue took a very long process.
        
           | genewitch wrote:
           | on dslreports or broadbandreports there's at least two
           | instances of me complaining about two cable companies
           | because, at last, it was figured out there was moisture
           | ingress in the LE (line extender, usually on cable lines on
           | poles). The only common denominator was it happened during
           | prime time, every night, and went away around midnight.
           | 
           | The other common denominator was the cable company refusing
           | to believe it was an issue with their equipment; this meant
           | it took a couple of months of calling them every night until
           | they finally sent a technician and a manager to my house to
           | verify that I wasn't wrong, leaving my house, coming back 15
           | minutes later to say "it'll be fixed tomorrow, there's a
           | problem with the LE balance up the road" - and then the issue
           | is resolved.
           | 
           | Now this doesn't sound so bad, until you learn that the first
           | time this happened to me, i had _only_ VoIP - so the internet
           | would start to foul, i 'd call the cable company, and the
           | tier 1 would reset my modem at some point, and then i
           | wouldn't be able to call back until after midnight (or
           | whatever), when there was no longer a problem. So after a
           | week of this, i would walk 30 minutes - one way - to a pay
           | phone (remember those?) once the internet slowed, call them,
           | explain that i couldn't do anything they wanted me to do
           | physically, since they disconnected my phone line every time
           | i called.
           | 
           | This is what happens with a de facto monopoly.
           | 
           | I will never pay suddenlink another dime, even if they're the
           | only terrestrial provider, for whatever reason.
        
             | Projectiboga wrote:
             | That time is an intersection of heavy home use and when the
             | dew hits.
        
             | notnaut wrote:
             | I think you'd get this problem, monopoly or not, whenever
             | cost saving measures are in place (and they always are, for
             | good reason) at the customer-interface level.
             | 
             | Maybe there should always be a hidden option that only
             | people that meet a certain troubleshooting ability
             | threshold get access to when calling in for tech
             | support....
        
               | organsnyder wrote:
               | > I think you'd get this problem, monopoly or not,
               | whenever cost saving measures are in place (and they
               | always are, for good reason) at the customer-interface
               | level.
               | 
               | I'm guessing that these scripts that we're all
               | complaining about solve 95% of problems customers call in
               | about. Sure makes things painful for the 5% of cases,
               | though.
               | 
               | I've been a (grudging) Comcast customer for ~17 years,
               | and I have been impressed by how their monitoring has
               | improved over that time. It's been quite a number of
               | years since I've had to convince them that I had an
               | actual problem that their systems didn't automatically
               | detect.
        
               | TeMPOraL wrote:
               | There _is_ a hidden option - you can call it  "proof of
               | work", or "proof of determination". You keep calling, and
               | trying ways to escalate, maybe even send a paper letter;
               | eventually, something in the customer "support" process
               | will yield and you'll get through to someone who can
               | actually help you.
        
               | aftbit wrote:
               | SHIBBOLEET
               | 
               | https://xkcd.com/806/
        
             | creeble wrote:
             | Interesting, I wonder if I'm experiencing something a
             | little bit similar that Comcast can't seem to debug.
             | 
             | Almost every day, in the heat of summer, I get one to five
             | 10-minute outages as soon as the temp gets over about 80F.
             | More when it's hotter, usually. Usually it results in a
             | modem reset, so it's hard to tell how long the actual
             | outage is.
             | 
             | Been happening for going on 5 years. They replaced the
             | under-street cable from our house to the junction box
             | across the street to no effect. I suspect it's that
             | junction box, but afaict, none of my neighbors that share
             | that junction box have the same issue. Not very fun to have
             | your WFH day collapse unexpectedly in the middle of the
             | afternoon.
             | 
             | Strangely, for the last month we've had several days of 80+
             | temps with no sign of outage. So fun.
             | 
             | Edit: yes of course multiple modem replacements and inside
             | cable checks, to no avail.
        
               | withinboredom wrote:
               | We had the same problem at an old house. There was a
               | cable splitter in the attic that was expanding in the
               | heat and losing connection to the cable. We bought a
               | heftier one and moved it under the insulation in the
               | attic.
        
               | creeble wrote:
               | Interesting, I removed a splitter from the attic many
               | years ago and replaced it with an F-F coupler.
               | 
               | I wonder if the coupler's center conductor contacts could
               | be expanding just enough to break the connection?
        
               | withinboredom wrote:
               | I wouldn't be surprised if that was happening.
        
               | abofh wrote:
               | Yeah, probably very similar thing if that pattern is
               | true. It's the shift forcing your modem to change speeds,
               | but neither side being willing to accept it.
               | 
               | If you can, try forcing a level at/below the speed you
               | get during the breakage and see if it just rides it out.
               | If it does, shift it back up and plan your coffee breaks
               | around it. Or don't, I'm not your mother
        
               | itzworm wrote:
               | Several day's of 80+ temps, meaning it hasn't dropped
               | below 80? Possibly it is just getting above 80 before you
               | start your work day. And not dropping below until after
               | your work day has ended?
               | 
               | I've experienced something similar except for
               | temperatures below ~32-36 degrees. At this particular
               | location it would result in a ~1hr outage going below
               | that temperature, but not when it went back above it for
               | some reason.
        
           | lostlogin wrote:
           | Moisture in copper cables is what slowed me down too. It was
           | in a section up the road from me. However now that fibre is
           | installed, it's glorious and works in the rain.
        
         | valbaca wrote:
         | Had a similar effect with garage door sensors and TVs which use
         | infrared. During sunset, the sun would line up juust right to
         | blank out the sensors
        
         | qingcharles wrote:
         | Argh. My own mouse not working one:
         | 
         | - Use to fix PCs professionally in the early 90s.
         | 
         | - Guy comes in with PC. Right-mouse button stopped working.
         | 
         | - Replace mouse. Still not working.
         | 
         | - Play with Windows 3.1 drivers. Nothing helps.
         | 
         | - Pull HDD from another PC, install, boot. Mouse button still
         | broken. WTF.
         | 
         | - Pull whole mobo, put another spare mobo in, with replacement
         | HDD and replacement mouse. Still don't work.
         | 
         | - Replace PSU. Right-button works.
         | 
         | - Give up on computers, live in wilderness, eat squirrels.
        
           | irrational wrote:
           | I used to know an older woman who did trap and eat squirrels
           | as her main source of protein, so... this isn't entirely
           | unlikely.
        
         | jonhohle wrote:
         | When it's sunny, my wife's car can't open the garage door, and
         | my car requires getting extremely close. Once the sun goes
         | down, we can both open the door from the street.
         | 
         | It turns out our solar panels (or the optimizers, or the
         | inverter) emit radio frequencies that interfere with our garage
         | door opener. When the sun is out and they are producing energy,
         | the interference is stronger than the homelink garage door
         | opener.
         | 
         | A few years ago the garage door openers started working fine.
         | It took a few days to realize it was because the inverter had
         | failed.
         | 
         | I'm fairly certain there are some FCC regulations that would
         | require our installer to fix it, but that relationship soured
         | during installation and I'd rather deal with an unusable garage
         | remote than dealing with them for warranty work.
        
           | LazyMans wrote:
           | If you get a SDR, you can watch the interference and try
           | things to help reduce it. An SDR should be like $20 and you
           | plug it into a computer
        
           | _whiteCaps_ wrote:
           | Some clip on ferrites on the inverter cables might help.
           | 
           | If you have any amateur radio neighbours they'd probably love
           | to help you with a project like this.
        
             | TeMPOraL wrote:
             | If they had a HAM in direct neighborhood, I imagine said
             | HAM would already pay them a visit - the interference from
             | the inverter is likely not constrained to the ISM band.
        
               | staticfish wrote:
               | Not to be a pedant, but just for your info, Ham is not an
               | acronym :)
        
             | jonhohle wrote:
             | On the cables coming in from the panels or wiring going
             | back to the main panel?
        
           | midoridensha wrote:
           | How old is the garage door opener? Older ones used
           | frequencies that are more susceptible to interference from
           | certain sources. It's possible to buy new receivers to
           | connect to your existing door opener.
        
             | jonhohle wrote:
             | The garage door openers aren't terribly old, but they are
             | terrible!
             | 
             | I have a HomeKit opener attached to it that we use during
             | the day. Fortunately that's been reliable enough to get
             | around the issue.
        
           | djmips wrote:
           | Just curious but did you try any bodged shielding?
        
             | jonhohle wrote:
             | I used a coax cable to move the antenna closer to the
             | exterior wall and didn't see an improvement, however, I
             | might not have grounded the shielding properly. I've had to
             | replace the control board since then and didn't replace the
             | antenna on the new board, but may try that again.
        
         | mlegendre wrote:
         | Your mouse story makes me think of the day the CI system at
         | work turned out not to be robust to vibrations.
         | 
         | One day we started having flaky tests, seemingly out of
         | nowhere. We quickly identified that the issue affected tests
         | involving graphical X client applications, but then we
         | struggled to make further progress. The issue was just
         | impossible to reproduce in other conditions... Well, as it
         | happens, the CI jobs were running on some desktop machines we
         | had installed somewhere within our premises. It turned out that
         | some gentleman had plugged a mouse into one of the machines,
         | and left it lying around on the shelf. Since then, when _one of
         | the machines_ was under a heavy load, the fans would spin
         | faster, causing more vibrations, in turn causing the mouse to
         | move, ever so slightly. And for ungodly reasons, this had side
         | effects on tests.
         | 
         | Fun fact: the machines were not on my site, I managed to
         | diagnose this over SSH. I was quite proud :-)
        
           | dharmab wrote:
           | > And for ungodly reasons, this had side effects on tests.
           | 
           | Let me guess - tests with very tight timings?
        
             | mlegendre wrote:
             | Sadly I can't remember this part; I'm pretty sure there
             | were comical bits to it.
             | 
             | This makes me want to dig out the gitlab issue, and turn it
             | into a better write-up! This'll have to wait until I'm back
             | from holidays though.
        
         | kulahan wrote:
         | I love these kinds of problems. There's an old story about a
         | bug where some people couldn't send an email further than 500
         | miles. Huh?
         | 
         | https://web.mit.edu/jemorris/humor/500-miles
        
           | chrisbolt wrote:
           | Yesterday's discussion:
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37576633
        
         | nvy wrote:
         | Your car repeatedly doesn't start so instead of taking it to
         | the shop, you... write a letter to the CEO of Pontiac who not
         | only actually reads the letter but also personally dispatches
         | an engineer to waste a week going out for ice cream? And
         | Pontiacs have a known vapor lock design flaw that only you, the
         | letter writer, are experiencing? And you've only experienced it
         | on your ice cream runs? And you've never got the vanilla ice
         | cream but took a little extra long so the vapor lock dissipated
         | and disproved your cute theory about vanilla ice cream?
         | 
         | Seriously, this is one of those dumbass stories that come from
         | your boomer relatives with the subject line "fwd: fwd: fwd:
         | fwd: fwd: fwd: fwd: fwd: re: fwd: fwd: fwd: fwd: fwd: fwd:
         | vanilla ice cream"
         | 
         | Nobody actually believes this story is true, right?
        
           | kawhah wrote:
           | Also ridiculously implausible is that the supermarket keeps
           | vanilla ice cream in a completely different location in the
           | store.
        
             | thaumasiotes wrote:
             | Aisle caps commonly feature a product that would ordinarily
             | be found alongside a bunch of closely-related products
             | somewhere else in the store. But I don't think I've ever
             | seen a refrigerated aisle cap.
        
               | kawhah wrote:
               | ..nor would the featured product simply be one flavor of
               | ice cream, as opposed to, say, all the Ben & Jerry's.
        
               | TeMPOraL wrote:
               | Obviously, they'd put the most popular flavor _way at the
               | back_ of the store, and the least popular flavors at the
               | front. The store is not in the business of maximizing
               | throughput of customers - quite the opposite, they want
               | customers to spend more time walking and getting lost
               | between shelves, as this maximizes the amount of wares
               | moved.
        
               | thaumasiotes wrote:
               | I believe the aisle caps are bid for, and then arranged
               | by, the manufacturers. The store just sells them the
               | space.
               | 
               | The manufacturer is unlikely to see a problem with
               | putting a display of very popular products right at the
               | front of the store where people can't help but see it.
        
               | kawhah wrote:
               | So you think Vanilla Inc, the company that only makes
               | vanilla flavor ice cream, is paying for a whole chiller
               | that they fill with vanilla, since all the other flavors
               | are not as popular?
               | 
               | Or perhaps, unbeknownst to everyone in the world who uses
               | the word 'vanilla' to mean 'mundane', vanilla ice cream
               | actually enjoys far higher profit margins than all other
               | ice cream.
        
           | lamename wrote:
           | While I appreciate your point, I think anyone who has spent
           | sufficient time troubleshooting complex systems has dealt
           | with similar types of problems, and can grasp the _spirit_ of
           | the story.
           | 
           | In fact, I'd argue the quaint style of the story does geeks a
           | favor: if it's appealing to normies, maybe they'll appreciate
           | us technical folks' perspective a little more.
        
             | kawhah wrote:
             | actually the story is detrimental to helping people
             | understand how technical systems and troubleshooting work,
             | because it's so poorly invented.
             | 
             | lots of people, both technical professionals, and non-
             | engineers who are observant and have an appropriate level
             | of belief in causality, troubleshoot transient failures
             | like this all the time. a difference in the amount of time
             | between shutting down the engine and starting it up is one
             | of the first things that someone like this would test, or
             | control for. it's beyond implausible that the second time
             | the guy got vanilla (after riding along for 4 trips, two
             | long and two short), the engineer didn't raise the question
             | of how long he was in the store.
             | 
             | people troubleshoot things like this by being able to
             | separate causes which are plausible, although unlikely and
             | surprising, from things which aren't remotely plausible.
             | the 500-mile email story and the stories above about
             | sunlight interfering with sensors demonstrate this.
             | 
             | if you're the sort of person who believes that the type of
             | ice cream you get might affecting your car's ignition - the
             | type of person who buys ice cream often but never thinks
             | about how long the errand takes, you simply never get the
             | point of being able to make a pattern between those two
             | things. the second time your car doesn't start, you blame
             | it on the scratch-off lottery ticket you won $2 on which
             | used up your supply of luck for the day. the third time,
             | you conclude that the car ignition knew you were late and
             | likes to choose its failures to cause maximum annoyance.
             | and the fourth time, you realize that your mother-in-law
             | gave your car the evil eye that morning.
             | 
             | the story as told, especially when presented as a real
             | parable about engineering rather than an amusing myth, is
             | frankly insulting to the other type of person. the
             | untrained, not necessarily educated person who cares about
             | machines and believes in material reality. the person who
             | starts checking their watch each time they go to the store
             | and a couple of weeks later is telling their mechanic
             | friend "if it's more than 3 minutes or so, it's fine. but
             | if you try and start it before 2 minutes, then you have to
             | wait another 5 before it's ready to go".
        
           | alexthehurst wrote:
           | And having a stranger along for the shopping trip doesn't
           | affect the timing more than the extra walk to the back of the
           | store?
           | 
           | And the engineer is sitting in the car on the first night and
           | it "wouldn't start," which signals the end of the episode for
           | the day. Were they stranded? Did the car start after a few
           | tries, which would have given a huge hint about the root
           | cause? Surely the engineer who had reproduced the issue would
           | quickly narrow it down by running diagnoses on the car
           | itself.
           | 
           | But the family dynamics are the most improbable part here.
           | How does the family have this predictable routine and not
           | simply stock up on ice cream? The family has enough kids that
           | the consume a whole $unit of ice cream per day. So with that
           | much chaos in the house, how does the dad justify going out
           | for a drive after dinner when the chaos of family multi-
           | tasking (cleanup, chores, homework, bedtime) is at its peak?
           | "Oh, look. Out of ice cream again. I'll be back in a few!"
        
           | NoZebra120vClip wrote:
           | LEGEND: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cone-of-silence/
        
         | janxgeist wrote:
         | We had a similiar problem with a label printer.
         | 
         | On some days, exclusively in the morning hours, the printer
         | would fail to detect the start of a new label, printing over
         | several labels.
         | 
         | After connecting remotely and checking the usual (queue,
         | network connection, drivers etc), I asked my colleague to call
         | me, as soon as it happened again.
         | 
         | When I went there, I saw that a ray of sunlight hit the
         | printer. The windows had shutters, but there was a gap.
         | 
         | Label printers detect the gap between labels using a laser. And
         | for some reason, the printer's case had a clear window at the
         | top.
         | 
         | I printed an empty label and stuck it on the little window.
        
           | Paul-Craft wrote:
           | Printer, fix thyself!
        
       | John_Wilkins wrote:
       | Ah, gather 'round, me dear friends, and let ol' Uncle Colm regale
       | ye with a software engineering tale that'll have ye chucklin' and
       | admirin' the wonders of technology!
       | 
       | 'Twas back in the early days of the internet, when dial-up
       | connections ruled the land and floppy disks were the height of
       | data storage. I found meself workin' as a young software engineer
       | for a company that aimed to revolutionize the way folks
       | communicated. They called it "email."
       | 
       | Now, ye might think email's as commonplace as a pot of tea these
       | days, but back then, it was like magic. Me team and I were tasked
       | with creatin' the very first email client for personal computers.
       | We had grand ideas, but, oh, the challenges we faced!
       | 
       | Our office was a chaotic mix of wires, half-eaten sandwiches, and
       | programmers hunched over their keyboards, with cups of strong
       | coffee never more than arm's reach away. We'd spend hours
       | debuggin', tweakin', and scratchin' our heads, tryin' to make
       | sense of the code.
       | 
       | But there was one particularly ornery bug that had us stumped.
       | Every time a user sent an email, a gremlin in the system would
       | gobble it up, and it never reached the recipient. We dubbed this
       | foul creature the "Email Bandit."
       | 
       | We tried every trick in the book, but the Email Bandit remained
       | elusive. The boss was near despair, and me colleagues were ready
       | to throw in the towel. But ye see, I had a plan. A plan so bold,
       | it was downright cheeky.
       | 
       | I reckoned that if the Email Bandit was stealin' our precious
       | messages, maybe he had a hankerin' for a particular type of
       | email. So, I composed a message that read, "Dear Email Bandit,
       | we've got a special treat for you. Please don't eat this one."
       | 
       | We sent that message out into the digital wilds, and we waited.
       | Lo and behold, within minutes, the Email Bandit struck! He
       | gobbled up the message and vanished into the ether.
       | 
       | Now, remember, we engineers are a clever bunch. We'd embedded a
       | little tracker in that email, and it led us straight to the Email
       | Bandit's hideout - a rogue line of code that no one had noticed
       | before.
       | 
       | With the Bandit cornered, we rewrote that line, patched up our
       | software, and celebrated like we'd won the lottery. From that day
       | on, our email client worked like a charm, and we'd slain the
       | Email Bandit once and for all.
       | 
       | So, me friends, never underestimate the power of a bit of
       | creativity and a dash of cheekiness when it comes to solvin'
       | software engineering conundrums. And remember the tale of the
       | Email Bandit, a reminder that sometimes, the most elusive
       | problems have the simplest solutions, hidden in plain sight.
       | Slainte to the world of software engineering!
        
       | killjoywashere wrote:
       | Late to the party, but wikipedia article for the root cause
       | analysis when someone accidentally stumbles on this thread in 7
       | years:
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vapor_lock
        
       | MarkusWandel wrote:
       | Someone in my extended family had a Toyota Highlander which would
       | randomly decide "you don't need window defog today", leading to a
       | near inability to drive the car if fogging was an issue. The
       | dealer didn't believe him until one day it actually happened
       | while they were watching. They had no idea what to do or how to
       | fix it. Solution: Trade the thing in against a Honda Passport.
       | He's had that for quite a while now and I haven't heard any
       | complaints.
       | 
       | On the other hand, my previous Honda Civic with its dual voltage
       | electric system (computer thinks the battery needs charging?
       | Generate 14.4V. Computer thinks it doesn't? Generate 12.6V)
       | caused us considerable grief until we just started driving around
       | with the headlight switch on all the time (this forced it into
       | the higher charging voltage). This "feature" is not well
       | known/understood even by mechanics and has probably caused untold
       | numbers of alternator replacements.
       | 
       | Current Civic is so automated that even the headlight on and
       | high/low beam is under the computer's control. Hopefully no weird
       | chronic computer bugs in this one.
        
         | WirelessGigabit wrote:
         | Sell it to someone living in Phoenix. Don't need the defogger
         | here.
         | 
         | Although the AC and car fans do overtime here.
        
       | shadowgovt wrote:
       | I currently have a Raspberry Pi that consistently loses its
       | network stack at some point in the early morning.
       | 
       | The likeliest correlation is that I have the Pi dump backups at
       | that time, and it may be crashing the network stack due to
       | unexpected hardware output because running a hard drive and the
       | internal wifi simultaneously under-volts the system. But it sure
       | does look like it just gets visited by demons in the pre-twilight
       | hours.
        
       | slurpee2 wrote:
       | not related to cars but how improbable news can be true : Martha
       | Mitchell effect
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martha_Mitchell_effect
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | NoZebra120vClip wrote:
       | I lived in N. California in 1996, and I had an impressive 486DX66
       | tower machine. That summer, I would go to work during the day,
       | and my girlfriend would use the computer as much as she liked.
       | I'd use it at night and on weekends.
       | 
       | She began to complain that it was locking up. It happened to her
       | over and over, but not to me, so I wasn't sure why.
       | 
       | One day I had occasion to remove the case and look inside. The
       | CPU fan had become dislodged, and would spin uselessly without
       | cooling down the fast 486.
       | 
       | I owed an apology to my girlfriend. Many years later, I was able
       | to apply this elementary knowledge to help out my father, whose
       | notebook always locked up. He put it on a cooling pad, which was
       | enough to allow the vents to work, even without running those
       | external fans.
        
       | husamia wrote:
       | common sense in hind sight helps
        
       | yosser wrote:
       | So this guy never ever restarted his car after a short interval
       | except for when he bought vanilla ice cream? Additionally, he
       | never varied the time intervals in the shop when he was buying
       | aforementioned ice cream?
       | 
       | Is it is an understatement to suggest this is a highly unlikely
       | circumstance?
        
         | gwbas1c wrote:
         | Doubtful. We all fall into patterns in life; and regular
         | activities where we go in and out have very predictable times.
        
         | kumarvvr wrote:
         | He probably learned how to reproduce the problem, experimented
         | with it, and when the engineer came, he was proud to reproduce
         | it and embellish his story a bit to make it seem perfect.
        
         | Kerb_ wrote:
         | You don't think it's likely that the regular 5 minute stops
         | were the first warning sign and most common time he restarted
         | his car after a short interval? Especially vapor lock on a hot
         | day when one is likely to buy ice cream? Maybe he would've
         | noticed it in more places if it got worse. And since he was
         | going for ice cream, he was unlikely to dawdle around waiting
         | for the product to melt?
        
         | barryrandall wrote:
         | The customer's location would have been helpful information.
         | That kind of determinism seems impossible in Los Angeles, but
         | very likely in Solon, IA.
        
         | kijin wrote:
         | A lot of men are extremely efficient shoppers. They know what
         | they want and where it is. They don't browse around at all.
         | They have the cash or card ready. Walk in, pick up the ice
         | cream, pay, walk out. Could be done in 30 seconds if there are
         | no other customers.
        
       | shireboy wrote:
       | I miss Car Talk with "Click and Clack the Tappit Brothers". Not
       | sure if this was on the show, but seems like it could have been.
       | Definitely check it out if you enjoyed this anecdote.
        
         | jefftk wrote:
         | https://cartalk.com/radio/puzzler/finicky-volare
        
       | zabil wrote:
       | A few years back, I had the opportunity to work on a project in
       | rural India. Our team was responsible for creating a new patient
       | booking system for a community hospital. We designed a web-based
       | application that could be accessed through the hospital's
       | intranet.
       | 
       | Everything seemed to be going well, but then we hit a snag. Our
       | server began restarting unexpectedly at random intervals
       | throughout the day. Initially, we were baffled. We assumed that
       | the application was crashing because it could not handle the
       | load, and we spent hours digging through code and logs.
       | 
       | But the real culprit turned out to be something entirely
       | different. The server was located next to a storage cabinet, and
       | its power supply line was inconveniently blocking the cabinet's
       | door. Whenever the nurses needed to access the cabinet, they
       | would simply unplug the server, get what they needed, and then
       | plug it back in, oblivious to the chaos it caused in the system.
       | 
       | It taught us the importance of considering all variables, even
       | the human ones, when troubleshooting technical issues. And so, we
       | moved the server, cleared the path to the storage cabinet, and
       | things were back to normal :)
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | tornato7 wrote:
       | I can't vouch for the veracity of this story, but an older
       | engineer who worked on a particle accelerator once told me this
       | story from the 1980s:
       | 
       | The particle accelerator would start overheating every day right
       | after lunch time. They eventually figured out that enough people
       | were using the bathroom after lunch that it was affecting the
       | water pressure in the cooling system!
       | 
       | I'm not very good at retelling stories.
        
         | knodi123 wrote:
         | I guess there's precedent:
         | 
         | https://twitter.com/SwiftOnSecurity/status/74326789852998041...
        
       | hk__2 wrote:
       | This is a urban legend: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cone-
       | of-silence/
        
       | SonicSoul wrote:
       | _engineer, being a logical man, refused to believe that this man
       | 's car was allergic to vanilla ice cream. He arranged, therefore,
       | to continue his visits for as long as it took to solve the
       | problem._
       | 
       | the moral of this story, the engineer being a logical man refused
       | to try reproducing the problem and devoted infinite time to
       | watching the user shop every night. that way he gets paid to hang
       | and eat ice cream
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | xpe wrote:
       | This story is a playful example of confounding:
       | 
       | > In causal inference, a confounder (also confounding variable,
       | confounding factor, extraneous determinant or lurking variable)
       | is a variable that influences both the dependent variable and
       | independent variable, causing a spurious association. Confounding
       | is a causal concept, and as such, cannot be described in terms of
       | correlations or associations. The existence of confounders is an
       | important quantitative explanation why correlation does not imply
       | causation. Some notations are explicitly designed to identify the
       | existence, possible existence, or non-existence of confounders in
       | causal relationships between elements of a system. / Confounds
       | are threats to internal validity.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confounding
       | 
       | Here is a sketch of a statistical model that shows a confounder
       | (a variable affecting both the dependent and independent
       | variables)                    S = f(H, I, T)              `S`:
       | car starting or not (dependent variable)         `H`: how hot is
       | the car engine (independent variable)         `I`: ice cream type
       | chosen (independent variable)         `T`: time taken to buy the
       | ice cream (a confounder)
       | 
       | Explanation: `T` influences `S` because a shorter time leads to
       | `H` (a hotter engine, which is prone to vapor lock). And `T` also
       | influences `I` (type of ice cream chosen) because the placement
       | of vanilla ice cream allows for quicker purchase. Voila, now we
       | have a spurious relationship between `I` and `S`.
        
         | mkwarman wrote:
         | This is an interesting explanation, but wouldn't `I` influence
         | `T` rather than the other way around? Since the type of ice
         | cream determines the amount of time taken in the store.
        
           | xpe wrote:
           | My comment did two things (but they were somewhat muddled).
           | It: (a) laid a particular model; and (b) offered
           | {explanations/claims} of causality. But unfortunately it said
           | nothing about (c) experimental design.
           | 
           | I'll start with (c). Attempting to talk about a model in
           | isolation from its experimental design can be misleading, as
           | it ignores the context that gives the model its interpretive
           | power and validity. In this case, a good experimental design
           | must include a sufficiently diverse sample of people to
           | account for variation.
           | 
           | Regarding (b), depending on the person, the influence could
           | flow either way between `I` and `T`, to varying degrees.
           | 
           | - Example of `I->T`: One person might come into the store
           | strongly preferring one type of ice cream (`I`) and be
           | willing to take time to look for it (`T`)
           | 
           | - Example of `T->I`: Another person might come into the store
           | in a hurry and be motivated to procure the closest ice cream
           | flavor.
           | 
           | Regarding (a), no model is 'true' but some are better than
           | others for particular purposes.
           | 
           | - To the extent that prediction is the key goal, confounding
           | variables don't usually matter.
           | 
           | - But to the extent that _statistical inference_ is the key
           | goal, there are many techniques for teasing apart influence.
           | 
           | Unfortunately, too often in machine learning contexts, the
           | word "inference" refers to the process of using a trained
           | model for _prediction_. Yikes. This contrasts sharply with
           | the term's use in statistics. The field of statistics got
           | this one right, even as ML techniques have taken off
           | spectacularly.
        
       | gnicholas wrote:
       | My DSL internet would get incredibly slow at certain hours of the
       | day when web traffic would be expected to be heavy (evening, as
       | people are getting home, and around 10, as people are watching
       | Netflix). AT&T refused to believe that the cause was congestion.
       | No no, they said, it must be that there's a sprinkler that's
       | going on at the same time each day, or a microwave that was
       | causing a problem with your internet. Eventually they sent
       | someone out and discovered that it was, in fact, a congested
       | circuit that I was on. I couldn't believe they were so steadfast
       | in claiming that it was some crazy-sounding external cause.
        
       | lisper wrote:
       | I call shenanigans. There is no way this not an apocryphal story.
       | There is no way anyone could not have realized that it was the
       | time spent in the store and not the flavor of ice cream that was
       | the relevant aspect of the story.
        
       | euroderf wrote:
       | Another classic:
       | https://users.cs.utah.edu/~elb/folklore/magic.html
       | 
       | Disclaimer: I worked for a startup named after this bit of
       | folklore.
        
       | hi41 wrote:
       | Is this story trustworthy worthy? I see it is from cmu.edu which
       | is great but it is under the humour directory. Just wanted to
       | make sure.
        
         | teddyh wrote:
         | Nope, it's an urban legend: <https://www.snopes.com/fact-
         | check/cone-of-silence/>
        
           | hi41 wrote:
           | Thank you for your comment. Your comment should be the
           | topmost as it offers a necessary correction. I liked the
           | story so much that I favorited it and wanted the story to be
           | true. It made me sad initially to know that the story is not
           | true. But I am happier now since I that I know accurate
           | information. Thanks much.
        
       | alargemoose wrote:
       | I have one of these to share. My first job out of college the
       | office had an issue where at ~3pm every day, the network would go
       | down for a minute or two, then be slow for a while after coming
       | back up. This as a digital marketing company, so lots of
       | file/image/video uploads happening all the time. We ultimately
       | determined it was the router hitting max load, crashing then
       | rebooting and having to manage all the pending uploads. From
       | everyone realizing it was getting close to the end of the day,
       | and making sure their video uploads were started. The company had
       | grown a lot in the last year, but was still using a home grade
       | router/wap combo. I replaced it with a UniFi AP and an UniFi
       | edgerouter. And the problem went away!
        
       | ctenb wrote:
       | Why did the car only fail to start in front of the ice cream
       | shop? Surely there are more occasions where you turn off the
       | engine and turn it back on again within a short time?
        
         | ggreer wrote:
         | Because the story is fiction. There are so many variables that
         | would change the amount of time the engine is stopped: where
         | you parked, how long the line at the register is, whether you
         | had exact change or not. Also the ambient temperature would
         | change both the likelihood and duration of vapor lock.
        
           | singlow wrote:
           | Yes. There are so many details in the story that are
           | unbelievable. I will possibly believe that there was some
           | original true story with some subset of these circumstanced
           | but it got rearranged and exaggerated for effect.
           | 
           | I will never believe that GM sent an engineer to troubleshoot
           | this problem. Maybe in a small town a local dealer's mechanic
           | spent some time troubleshooting but he probably figured out
           | it was based on the short shut off time. Then he speculated
           | that it took less time to get Vanilla than the other flavors?
           | I doubt that is true - most likely it was random. It is
           | amazing how often a random sequence will have an extended
           | sequence that our brains won't believe is random.
           | 
           | Not sure I even believe there was any genuine observation of
           | correlation from the owner. These type of apocryphal
           | technical support stories are almost always formed backward
           | from a problem and someone tries to think of the most insane
           | way it could have manifested. But people love to believe
           | them.
        
       | rhuru wrote:
       | This reminds me of my village story. Two brothers married and
       | lived next to each other. The wives hated each other and competed
       | on everything. If brother 1 got something brother 2 had to buy
       | the same thing but bigger.
       | 
       | Over time they ended up building homes in this manner too and one
       | of the brothers purchases the largest available plastic watertant
       | on roof. Offended the other brother decided that he will build
       | even bigger water tank. So they built a massive concrete water
       | taken on the roof.
       | 
       | However the problem with this tank was that it would simply not
       | retain the water which was pumped into it via a small motor pump
       | which pulled the water from nearby well.
       | 
       | This resulted into the brother accusing the brother of "black
       | magic" and engaging in daily fist fights and abuse.
       | 
       | Eventually someone figured out that the person who connected the
       | intake pipe connected it at the bottom of the tank. So wehn the
       | tank was full the water would simply go back to the well.
        
       | soorya3 wrote:
       | This is a good interview question.
        
       | NamTaf wrote:
       | My parents have an early '50s MG, which they rarely drive. For
       | most of my adult life, I've lived about an hour away from them so
       | I'd sometimes take it out if I was there. Needless to say, it had
       | a never-ending list of quirks due to being so old and also rarely
       | being driven, but it's a lovely old car all the same.
       | 
       | One day, I dropped by to say hi, but they were both out. I
       | decided instead to take the car for a spin around the local
       | beachfront to give it a turn over. A few minutes into the drive,
       | I started to lose engine power, so I pulled over. The engine then
       | completely died on me, so I let it sit for a moment before trying
       | to kick it over again.
       | 
       | The fuel pump is such that when you first turn the key to power
       | the accessories, you hear it go tickticktick tick tick.. tick...
       | tick...... - the ticks slow as the pump builds up fuel pressure.
       | It's a good audio cue as to when you can then turn it to ignition
       | and kick the engine over. In this case though, the ticking wasn't
       | slowing - just the same tickticktickticktick. I tried to kick it
       | over several times, but no matter which deity I invoked, no luck.
       | 
       | Empty fuel tank then. I checked the fuel level (walk to the tank
       | on the back and poke a special bit of wood in to see how full it
       | is) but lo and behold, plenty there. So I let it sit for a few
       | minutes more and try again, hoping it may be to do with a flooded
       | carburetor after my several attempts to restart it. The same:
       | tickticktickticktick.
       | 
       | I gave Dad a call, describe the problem, tell him what I'd done
       | to solve it and that I'd concluded the fuel pump must be cactus.
       | I asked if he was going to be home soon to come give me a tow
       | home. At this point, I learnt that he was some hours away and Mum
       | was overseas, so no luck there. As I'm mentally preparing to push
       | the car home for over an hour, he interrupts - "open the bonnet,
       | grab the spanner out of the toolbox there and give the pump
       | several hard whacks".
       | 
       | "...what?"
       | 
       | "Beat the bejeezus out of the fuel pump a few times."
       | 
       | So I did, and I turned back on the accessories. Ticktickticktick
       | ticktick tick tick... tick.... tick.......
       | 
       | Dad then explains that this problem's been around for decades.
       | Very occasionally, a bubble of air will end up in the fuel feed
       | line. It then blocks the pump, which can't clear it, but a bit of
       | suitably percussive maintenance consistently dislodges it and the
       | pump can draw fuel in again.
       | 
       | As they say, old cars definitely have character, and I think that
       | comes about largely because people can understand, fault-find and
       | fix these sorts of analogue issues that arise. New cars are much
       | more reliable and don't face nearly as many random faults, but
       | those that do happen are almost impossible for Joe Public to
       | resolve on the side of the road.
        
         | kuhaku22 wrote:
         | You're an Aussie, I see :p
         | 
         | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cactus#Adjective
        
         | vGPU wrote:
         | Percussive maintenance is the second step to take for a car
         | that has been sitting for a while, right after the Italian
         | tuneup.
        
       | shaklee3 wrote:
       | We had a problem like this too at a satellite company. A customer
       | claimed their service was cutting out every day between 3-4pm.
       | There were no service outages, and it only seemed to affect them,
       | but we did see their modem drop consistently each day. Turned out
       | it was a very low elevation location to where the dish was
       | virtually horizontal. They received UPS packages almost daily
       | around that time, and the truck was blocking the signal long
       | enough to lose service momentarily.
        
       | doodpants wrote:
       | > Vanilla, being the most popular flavor, was in a separate case
       | at the front of the store for quick pickup.
       | 
       | Vanilla is the most popular flavor? That makes me skeptical of
       | the whole story. ;-)
        
         | gwbas1c wrote:
         | Have you ever given ice cream to young children?
         | 
         | I was a picky eater as a kid, yet I still can't fathom why so
         | many kids prefer vanilla over other flavors.
        
           | Kerb_ wrote:
           | It's reasonably complex while not typically being
           | overwhelming in my experience
        
         | BashiBazouk wrote:
         | Vanilla accounts for about a quarter of all ice cream sales in
         | the US. Chocolate is a close second but I think vanilla wins as
         | it is also the most common to serve with other desserts. Apple
         | pie a la mode is always with vanilla ice cream for example...
        
         | Finnucane wrote:
         | It is, certainly would have been at the time anyone would be
         | driving a Pontiac. But it is dubious that the store would have
         | a separate case for it. And making a trip for it every night
         | after you've had dinner? And an engineer spent days working on
         | the problem in person? THe story is weird.
         | 
         | Also, vanilla is good.
        
           | rsynnott wrote:
           | > And an engineer spent days working on the problem in
           | person?
           | 
           | This is the only slightly credible bit IMO; companies
           | sometimes do this! If you have a really weird problem in
           | something you've sold a few million units of, you really,
           | really want to know what that problem is, before more people
           | start complaining.
           | 
           | The supermarket layout is clearly contrived to make the story
           | work, though, and doesn't otherwise make any sense.
        
         | aidenn0 wrote:
         | It's the most popular flavor in the same way the Settlers of
         | Catan is the most popular Euro board-game. It's rarely
         | anybody's favorite, but very few people hate it.
        
         | moffkalast wrote:
         | Given that it's become a synonym for 'conventional', I'm not
         | sure why you'd be sceptical. It's the least common denominator
         | flavour.
        
           | macintux wrote:
           | Same reason grayscale cars are very common: even if a family
           | likes bright colors, they may not like the same bright
           | colors, and may not trust they'll be able to sell it to
           | someone else later.
        
         | 5555624 wrote:
         | Vanilla consistently ranks as the most favorite ice cream
         | flavor. A search for "most popular ice cream in the world" has
         | as the top result: "According to statistics, vanilla ice cream
         | is the most popular ice cream in the world. From the USA across
         | to China, its appeal is universal."
         | 
         | An example of the top 21 flavors (in America):
         | https://www.krqe.com/news-resources/ranking/the-21-most-popu...
        
       | schainks wrote:
       | One night while in the computer science lab doing a Java
       | assignment, my professor for that class happened to walk by the
       | lab and quipped to me, "oh, good luck on _that_ machine."
       | 
       | He explained: once upon a time, the machine refused to run _any_
       | Java programs, and would spectacularly crash and burn instead.
       | C++ fine, python fine, anything Java was a hard nope. He didn't
       | believe this at first until his program also started crashing the
       | machine.
       | 
       | It took a tech, him, and another professor about two weeks to
       | work out that the JVM happened to allocate the same RAM address
       | to the integer 12 on that particular machine every time the JVM
       | started. The actual chip of RAM that contained that hardware
       | address was faulty, so whenever the machine tried to allocate to
       | that address, it would crash.
       | 
       | Swapping out the bad RAM stick immediately solved the problem.
        
         | js2 wrote:
         | > At this point, there are two natural conclusions: either I
         | have a severe hardware issue, or there is a wild memory
         | corruption bug in the binary.
         | 
         | https://marcan.st/2017/12/debugging-an-evil-go-runtime-bug/
         | 
         | I won't spoil the conclusion. It's a long and winding path to
         | get there and a good read. HN discussion:
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15845118
        
       | going_to_work wrote:
       | Honestly, you would have to be pretty stupid to take this at face
       | value.
       | 
       | I immediately went to time, location, etc.
        
         | system2 wrote:
         | Probably a folktale and not real. A problem like this could be
         | solved with 3-4 step of process of elimination.
        
       | artur_makly wrote:
       | reminds me of this classic :
       | https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/a26tzt/four_engineer...
        
       | dumbfounder wrote:
       | This is a secondhand anecdote, but it's pretty funny. Back in the
       | days of server rooms, a friend's server for his company would
       | reboot every day around 5pm. They checked everything they
       | possibly could with the OS, they would be logged in and running
       | checks on it and it would spontaneously go offline for about 5
       | minutes and reboot every day. Finally they decided to go stand in
       | the presence of the server around the time it goes down every
       | day. They watched a cleaner come into the room, unplug the server
       | rack, plug in their vacuum and vacuum around the servers, and
       | then plug the server rack back in.
        
         | going_to_work wrote:
         | This story is older than the internet.
        
         | whartung wrote:
         | Similarly, we were just finishing up a project for a client and
         | we're just going through and connecting everything up.
         | 
         | The hardware consisted of 6 color terminals (Wyse 350s I
         | think), the server, and 10 PCs with large, 20" tube monitors.
         | We had these all in my bosses office powered through assorted
         | outlets and power strips. The room was wall to wall machinery.
         | 
         | It was after hours when the janitor came in and plugged in his
         | vacuum. I looked at him, he looked at me, I looked at my boss,
         | who looked back. We then both turned back to the janitor, who
         | looked at us.
         | 
         | Not a word was said as he fired it up. 2 seconds later, the
         | power was out, we blew the breaker. Took us a half hour to get
         | it back on. But it was funny at the time.
        
         | skipkey wrote:
         | I personally had a similar situation. We had an accounting firm
         | whose servers we were maintaining, and occasionally the print
         | server would reboot, always between 9 and 10 am. So I sat in
         | there for a week between those hours and noticed the light
         | would dim and occasionally the reboot would happen.
         | 
         | It turned out that the lawyer next door would come in, turn on
         | his PC, printer and coffee pot simultaneously because they were
         | all on the same power strip, and the drain was causing an
         | undervoltage on the circuit the server was on during startup.
         | We had it on a UPS, but it turns out that at the time consumer
         | grade UPS systems only handled outages.
         | 
         | I measured drops as low as to 85 volts, in practice anything
         | under 95 or sou would reboot.
        
         | krisoft wrote:
         | Oh I have a similar one. This one is first hand, I was in the
         | room when we were debuging the issue.
         | 
         | We were developing a smart camera product which were counting
         | traffic on a road. So for example a city council would install
         | this camera somewhere on a road and it would generate
         | statistics of how many lorries, and passenger vehicles, and
         | motorbikes used that road.
         | 
         | One of our cameras exhibited a problem where it restarted every
         | day around roughly the same time. It wasn't exactly the same
         | second though, in fact there was a clear pattern to it. One day
         | it would restart at 19:12:10 and the next day two second later,
         | then again the third day two more seconds later. (not the real
         | timestamp and i don't remember the real time deltas either, but
         | there was a clear progression)
         | 
         | After much debuging we learned that the issue was that as the
         | sun was settling some street furniture projected a shadow in
         | front of our camera. Our software wrongly concluded that it is
         | a vehicle and started collecting information about it for
         | classification. But of course shadows creep a lot slower than
         | real vehicles so it run out of memory before the "shaddow
         | vehicle" has passed out of the frame. And once we run out of
         | memory the system froze and then got restarted by a watchdog.
         | 
         | Turns out the pattern we have seen in the timestamps was caused
         | by the angle of the sun changing which made the shadow trick
         | our algorithm just a little bit later every day.
        
         | drivers99 wrote:
         | Definitely an urban legend at this point. A reddit thread[0]
         | mentions it being collected in 1990 from computer stories going
         | around in the 80s[1]
         | 
         | [0]
         | https://old.reddit.com/r/talesfromtechsupport/comments/5yrs1...
         | 
         | [1] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3227607-the-devouring-
         | fu...
        
           | bhickey wrote:
           | The story probably endures because things like this actually
           | happen [0, 1]
           | 
           | 0. https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/27/us/janitor-alarm-freezer-
           | rens...
           | 
           | 1. http://www.st-v-sw.net/Obsidian/Martin/gravity.htm (search
           | sprinkler)
        
           | kalleboo wrote:
           | I think the vacuum story gets retold because it's so close to
           | real-life stories.
           | 
           | The UPS on a server I manage would trip once a week around
           | the same time. The old story came to mind and sure enough,
           | once a week it was time to vacuum and someone would plug in a
           | vacuum cleaner into the same circuit (700W vacuum cleaner on
           | a 100V/15A circuit), causing enough voltage dip to kick the
           | UPS into gear.
        
           | joshvm wrote:
           | I mean it actually happens. Not powering down the actual
           | machine, but in my last house the landlord had a cleaner
           | visit every fortnight. Occasionally I came home to find
           | downloads broken or my remote connection would drop randomly
           | in the afternoon. We lived in an old house and had a wifi
           | extender to reach the upper floors (and not enough sockets).
           | The cleaner would unplug the extender to vacuum the kitchen
           | and half the house would go offline.
           | 
           | The ice cream story reads too much like a dramatisation to be
           | truly believable, but accidental and repeated unplugging is
           | common I expect.
        
           | drzaiusapelord wrote:
           | Essentially all these stories are apocryphal. Even this vapor
           | lock story.
           | 
           | Sorry but even before today, having a automotive engineer
           | sent to a random person's home over what clearly sounds like
           | a quack letter seems implausible to me. The dictates of
           | capitalism, human resources, and the politics of the
           | workplace would make this difficult if not impossible. Even
           | in the past when there was more human capital in support
           | positions and more of a sense of customer service.
           | 
           | Way, way too many suspicious stories involve high-level
           | people being involved in trivial issues. I just find it all
           | pretty suspicious. Real stories tend to start with poor
           | customer service at the dealership and being mocked by
           | managers and mechanics. Not some unrealistic ideal white
           | knight manager sending off engineers to people's homes.
           | Imagine how many weird letters a place like pontiac gets.
           | They don't have the manpower to do this if they actually
           | chose to do it, and engineers might balk at the idea of doing
           | at-home support too.
           | 
           | Pretty much any "idealized Americana" business story should
           | set off BS alarms in us. "Oh a trivial problem with your car?
           | No problem ma'am, I'm sending our top engineers over
           | tomorrow," doesn't happen because its costly and
           | unsustainable. Instead ask anyone who has odd car problems.
           | Its endless painful calls and visits to dealerships and
           | mechanics. There's a reason we have lemon laws for cars. Its
           | because whats described in this story doesn't actually happen
           | and people demand restitution.
           | 
           | I don't doubt that someone had a famous vapor lock shopping
           | story (ive heard different versions of this story, usually
           | about a housewife picking up her child from a nearby
           | elementary school), but over the years these stories get
           | modified into memetic structures based on dishonesty because
           | most people are social capital seeking and having a humorous
           | story provides them the immature ego boost they need. So "wow
           | my car had vapor lock when I make quick trips" became "So the
           | CEO of Ford came to my house to look at my ice cream car..."
           | The latter is just more interesting in the market of
           | storytelling.
           | 
           | That is to say, the ONLY reason this story is here is because
           | its been modified to be memeticly attractive. A "boring" (i
           | find old technology faults interesting, personally), but a
           | "boring" story about vapor lock wouldn't make it to places
           | like HN or reddit, which are memetic responders
           | (upvote/downvote mechanisms) and lowest-common denominator
           | (by this demographic) popularity machines. But dress up that
           | boring story and now everyone is repeating it, often times
           | claiming its their story and they know the people in it! The
           | same way the comment you're responding to probably doesn't
           | actually know the famous "unplug the server at 5pm" person.
        
             | jacobsenscott wrote:
             | Every now and then a ceo will do somethings like this. If
             | this is true idk. Good for PR.
        
             | jefftk wrote:
             | _> Essentially all these stories are apocryphal. Even this
             | vapor lock story._
             | 
             | The vapor lock ice cream story might go back to this 1997
             | Car Talk Puzzler, where Ray claims it was a customer of
             | his: https://cartalk.com/radio/puzzler/finicky-volare
        
             | omoikane wrote:
             | It's a fun story to read, whether it's fact or fiction. We
             | are not too concerned about whether a large company would
             | really send an engineer to investigate a seemly absurd
             | claim, in the same way that we are not too concerned about
             | whether one single shoe is able to uniquely identify
             | Cinderella and no one else.
        
             | Paul-Craft wrote:
             | It's not just _any_ memetic structure though. Urban legends
             | have a number of components to them that make people want
             | to re-tell them. See, for instance, my other comment here:
             | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37596325
             | 
             | One of the things I talk about is that these stories often
             | ride the edge of plausibility. Even with this one,
             | dispatching an engineer to someone's house over a "quack
             | letter" seems like a thing that could happen or could have
             | happened in the past. Having high level people involved is
             | a thing that others have talked about, but I'd also like to
             | point out that people have literally emailed
             | jeff@amazon.com before about issues and gotten resolutions
             | that way, so it's not _completely_ off the mark.
             | 
             | The real clue here that we're dealing with an urban legend
             | and not an actual incident (though it may be based on one)
             | is the lack of specifics. Urban legends are often not
             | really pinned down to any specific time or place.
        
             | ot1138 wrote:
             | Well, CEOs do look at these letters quite frequently. At
             | least, I did when I was the CEO of a networking company.
             | 
             | We were only selling equipment in the US at the time but
             | some had found its way around the globe. This one
             | particular Indian gentleman had been engaged for some time
             | with support claiming that his unit wasn't working right
             | and exhibiting all kinds of strange behavior.
             | 
             | I had a habit of looking at the cases with the longest open
             | history, which is how I found it. I continued to monitor
             | though I didn't send anyone out to India or anything like
             | that.
             | 
             | Eventually it came out that the sleek looking aluminum unit
             | had some kind of stocky packaging material stuck to it, so
             | the customer had put it in the washer to clean it off.
        
             | toss1 wrote:
             | >>all these stories are apocryphal
             | 
             | Do not mistake cynicism for intelligence. It is actually
             | negatively correlated [0, + other studies]
             | 
             | Just listing a basket of "I doubt..." and "No one does..."
             | does not make it all false.
             | 
             | Of course Just So stories exist, but that does not mean
             | that all cool stories are fabricated Just So stories. In
             | this case, it is the cynicism that merits a [Citation
             | Needed] tag.
             | 
             | [0] https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/trust-
             | games/202111/t...
        
             | Tangurena2 wrote:
             | I used to work for General Motors as a field engineer.
             | Basically, I was the "mechanic of last resort" for some
             | issues. The most certain method of getting something fixed
             | was to write a letter to someone at the top, or very close
             | to the top. When the request rolled downhill to "fix this",
             | no one knew if this was a whim or something serious (like
             | it was the CEO's neighbor). So those service requests got
             | absolute priority.
             | 
             | I remember one incident where that "fix it" letter came
             | from high enough that I drove out to the customer's house
             | and swapped out their radio in their driveway. At night.
             | 
             | When GM bought EDS, Ross Perot ended up on the board. He'd
             | do all sorts of silly things. Like when something went
             | wrong with his car, he'd take it to a dealership. And
             | report back to the board how _that_ went. The first few
             | times, they just told him to hand the keys to the valet at
             | the executive garage and tell them what needs fixing. The
             | plant I worked out of made radios. Other branches of the
             | division that I worked for made engine computers and
             | instrument clusters. If someone at the executive garage had
             | a radio problem, one of my tasks was to go out to the
             | assembly line, grab a radio, test it, then get it to the
             | Kokomo airport for the GM jet to pick up. FedEx (tagline:
             | _when it positively has to be there the next day_ ) wasn't
             | fast enough. That fleet of jets would carry parts from
             | plant to plant. And the executive garage was the best
             | equipped and best staffed GM dealership on Earth.
        
               | guidoism wrote:
               | Delco! I now live in one of those small factory towns in
               | Indiana. It's fascinating to me how so many little towns
               | in the Midwest existed just to make one small part for
               | Detroit.
        
               | bombcar wrote:
               | You soon learn at a big company that almost any expense
               | is justifiable to the boss if it prevents his boss from
               | asking inconvenient questions.
        
               | AceJohnny2 wrote:
               | By coincidence, I have witnessed this just last night. No
               | details will be provided to protect identity, I'll just
               | say you probably heard of the company.
               | 
               | It's staggering.
        
               | ot1138 wrote:
               | What industry?
        
               | AceJohnny2 wrote:
               | manufacturing.
        
               | donatj wrote:
               | You don't happen to be the guy who overnighted a bunch of
               | network cables for $5,000 because the boss had to have
               | them overnighted and the company didn't care what it cost
               | I read about recently? lol
        
               | bombcar wrote:
               | Oh for these silly escapades to only cost $5k.
        
             | genewitch wrote:
             | I've had the CEO of a municipal water company at my house
             | looking at what his contractors did to my property frontage
             | and potentially my well. Also, my other story in this
             | thread is documented in posterity on a forum, you can see i
             | didn't embellish any of it, and that involved a manager or
             | supervisor having to drive quite a long time to my house at
             | 10 PM with a technician to source a problem i had had for
             | weeks or months.
             | 
             | So, in essence, "it depends". Good stories, in the memetic
             | sense, will have hooks to ensure that the moral or point of
             | the story is remembered; in a great story, the memetic
             | hooks are so great that you can repeat the story nearly
             | verbatim to other people, after hearing it yourself.
        
             | AlbertCory wrote:
             | Wow, you used "memetic" three times. Very erudite.
        
               | bityard wrote:
               | Frankly I found the whole thing to be shallow and
               | pedantic.
        
               | AlbertCory wrote:
               | I've swung from -2 to +2 during the day.
               | 
               | You're right -- it was obviously a fun engineering
               | legend, and leave it at that.
        
             | yamazakiwi wrote:
             | Without vast knowledge, many unreasonable things are seen
             | as reasonable. How much of our history's truth is based on
             | what was told to the gullible majority? Should we not talk
             | about Mythology because a skeptic questions it's
             | authenticity?
             | 
             | Comedians make up stories all the time to entertain
             | audiences. These stories don't require accuracy, they are
             | more about delivering specific results; a laugh, a story to
             | share, confirmation bias, etc.
             | 
             | Many people lie, believing they're telling the truth. I
             | think you will have a hard time truth policing people who
             | don't and won't care, but focusing on truth and validity is
             | probably a useful skill for you in many parts of your life.
        
               | fragmede wrote:
               | If I tell you something I believe to be true, but
               | actually isn't, I'm not lying, just wrong. Lying involves
               | an intent to decieve, so if I don't know the truth, it's
               | not a lie.
        
               | kawhah wrote:
               | There is a word for telling something as though it were
               | factual but with a negligent disregard for its truth:
               | bullshit.
        
               | yamazakiwi wrote:
               | That is true, in addition, outcomes are not defined by
               | intentions. It was my hope to draw attention to why we
               | perpetuate this behavior (results).
               | 
               | There is a lot of gradation, the differences between
               | stating misinformation you believe is true vs stating
               | what the majority believes to be true due to laziness vs
               | an intentional lie, etc.
        
             | Ikatza wrote:
             | Your lack of faith is disturbing, specially when there are
             | first hand accounts of [Apple/Microsoft/Insert Co] sending
             | engineers to people's houses to diagnose unique problems.
             | This could be a perfectly real story, a different thing
             | would be that you choose not to believe it.
        
               | genewitch wrote:
               | during the PPC 603 era of Macintosh Performa series, we
               | had a bad motherboard, and apple sent an engineer to our
               | house to replace it. This is around the time that the
               | story of apple sending engineers to houses to remove
               | motherboards, raise them 2 feet above a flat surface, and
               | drop them was being passed around. Something about
               | reseating chips that one of their pick and place machines
               | was misaligned on or something.
        
               | astrange wrote:
               | Those might be field engineers, but I have heard of the
               | WiFi teams at computer companies going out to people's
               | houses to test especially weird situations.
        
               | djmips wrote:
               | When I worked my first job in retail in the mid eighties
               | - we were selling Atari ST and there was an official
               | Atari bulletin to do exactly that. It would reseat the
               | socketed chips.
        
               | genewitch wrote:
               | interesting; i doubt my memory is _that_ faulty, so it 's
               | possible the story went through some iterations, making
               | it an apocryphal story about apple, instead. Or,
               | possibly, the major pick and place manufacturer had a
               | slew of alignment issues in the 80s!
        
               | mrguyorama wrote:
               | I thought the apple "lift and drop the computer" story
               | was about the Apple 3. It had no vents, so it was always
               | overheating and "unseating chips" like the Xbox 360 heat
               | issues.
               | 
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_III#Design_flaws
               | 
               | And so it doesn't become apocryphal but stays a real
               | story, there 100% were people who "Fixed" their RRoD Xbox
               | 360s by wrapping them in towels for an hour so they
               | cooked themselves even more, or they put the mobo in the
               | oven on a low temperature. That fix was also 100% used
               | for fixing certain graphics cards unseating in the mid
               | 2000s as well.
        
               | genewitch wrote:
               | I've reflowed a GPU in an oven before, personally. with 5
               | little balls of aluminum foil as standoffs and monitoring
               | the temp closely. It fixed it. I probably still have that
               | - _working_ - card somewhere.
        
               | K7PJP wrote:
               | I've got an HP Laser Printer from about 15 years or so.
               | About once a year, the printer stops responding and I
               | have to remove the board, put it in the oven for 10
               | minutes or so to revive it.
        
               | Paul-Craft wrote:
               | What even is the theory on how that could possibly work?
               | I believe you, it's just that I don't have any mental
               | model of how baking a circuit board makes it work right
               | for a year, and how it keeps working to fix the issue.
        
               | brabarossa wrote:
               | The theory is that 'baking" it could reflow a bad solder
               | joint and fix it. A popular fix of last resort.
        
               | Paul-Craft wrote:
               | I get that that could work and might solve the problem
               | entirely. What I don't get is why you'd ever have to do
               | that every few months.
        
               | mrguyorama wrote:
               | Laser printers have parts that can get very hot. If their
               | "baking" reflowed the parts, but just barely, maybe those
               | hot parts would just cause the exact same problem all
               | over again.
        
           | permo-w wrote:
           | would it be surprising if this has happened more than once?
        
           | btilly wrote:
           | The version that I remember hearing was
           | https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/polished-off/. Also false.
        
             | Paul-Craft wrote:
             | I've never heard that one. It has many more characteristics
             | of a modern urban legend than the simple "janitor unplugs
             | the server then plugs it back in" story. Urban legends are
             | essentially modern day folk tales. They'll often involve
             | fear, horror, or even humor, and they're frequently cast as
             | cautionary tales. They tend to be reasonably detailed
             | (which helps keep a listener's attention), but at the same
             | time they frequently not pinned down to a specific time or
             | place. They're almost always told as secondhand stories (
             | _e.g._ it happened to  "a friend of a friend"), and tend to
             | fall at the edge of plausibility.
             | 
             | But, the key thing is that urban legends always reflect
             | some sort of underlying societal belief or worry. "Janitor
             | polishes off patients" is about the fear of death, and how
             | it can come for anyone at any time, and there's nothing
             | they can do about it. "Janitor unplugs server every night
             | at 5" is probably more about the idea that strange things
             | happen sometimes, but it usually turns out that there's a
             | good explanation.
        
         | incidel wrote:
         | 1999, the town hall of a small municipality s/e of Stuttgart
         | Germany. For the 3rd time in half a year me (IT apprentice) and
         | senior developer are onsite to fix one MS SQL db's broken
         | indizes. It's the early afternoon of friday and humid hot, a
         | thunderstorm is on it's way. We toil on and are almost done
         | when at about 16:00 the chief officer turns up and informs us
         | that we have to hurry because at 17:00 all electricity will be
         | cut in the building! Senior developer and me share a shocked
         | glance. "Is this every friday?" "Why yes! We conserve lots of
         | energy that way." Senior and me share another glance and on
         | impulse I speak up. "Isn't the weekly db cleanup scheduled for
         | 16:30 PM on fridays?" The senior developer nods. We spend the
         | remaining hour to fix the problem and then cancel this weeks
         | schedule and manually shut down the DB server for the time
         | being. Every friday these guys cut the power to the building,
         | causing all kinds of production issues with not only their
         | Netware Server but also the DB server for their collections
         | software (our product). As per maintenance contract we were
         | required to repair the DB everytime which was a hassle and a
         | waste of ressources on our behalf. In the end it took another
         | month or so until they relented and rescheduled the hard power
         | down until saturday morning so that all servers could shut down
         | properly even AFTER the backup jobs could complete (backup was
         | also totally broken but they never did check or even perform a
         | restore so they never actually noticed).
        
         | wolverine876 wrote:
         | > Back in the days of server rooms
         | 
         | Huh? Yesterday? Or are you referring to the fact that servers
         | are now often offsite, in 'clouds'?
        
           | Cthulhu_ wrote:
           | Pretty much, server rooms still exist in offices but they'll
           | mostly be for the network infrastructure, with most workloads
           | including email and storage having moved to the cloud.
           | Office365 is a really tempting offering, compared to
           | operating your own servers + staff.
        
         | iforgotpassword wrote:
         | Man I've heard this story so many times, this guy must have a
         | million friends in a hundred countries he's told this story to.
         | :-)
        
           | fernandotakai wrote:
           | funny thing, something like this happened to me. we were on
           | site doing some implementation and went back to the hotel at
           | about 3am.
           | 
           | less than an hour later, we get an email from nagios (i think
           | it was nagios? it was a GOOD while back) complaining the
           | server was offline. we got into a cab and went back straight
           | up (this server was not supposed to be offline ever).
           | 
           | guess what? a maintenance guy turned the server off by
           | mistake while cleaning up the server room -- even worse, he
           | was not even supposed to be there!
           | 
           | this triggered a bunch of security checks and the company
           | found out that most employees had access to any room in the
           | building.
        
           | SketchySeaBeast wrote:
           | The key to making friends is having a good story.
        
           | dkarl wrote:
           | I think it's more like a common experience. My wife and I
           | both work, so we have cleaners come in every two weeks for a
           | deep clean. We've used several different companies, and
           | apparently it's standard practice to unplug things when a
           | power outlet is needed. They don't unplug computers that have
           | monitors, and they don't unplug things with visible clocks
           | that would need to be reset, so they do take some care not to
           | inconvenience us, but they'll unplug anything else, including
           | NAS appliances, DVRs in the middle of recording shows, etc.
           | When we hire a new company, we make sure they mark down a
           | _special request_ that they not unplug anything, pointing out
           | that we have ample outlets and can help them find one or free
           | one up if necessary. I also replace any network connectors
           | that lose their little plastic locking tabs, because they 're
           | likely to slip loose when things get jostled around during
           | cleaning.
        
             | gav wrote:
             | It is a common story and sometimes those get put in the
             | collective blender and we get apocryphal stories out of it.
             | Here's two stories of my own:
             | 
             | Back in the mid 90s, I built out a system that gave every
             | school in a district their own webpage that was carved out
             | of some government funding for providing internet access.
             | There was no budget for hardware though, so it ended up
             | running on a repurposed workstation in somebody's office.
             | One Tuesday even the cleaners unplugged it to vacuum and it
             | didn't power back up after being plugged in. On Wednesday
             | somebody helpfully stuck a piece of paper saying "don't
             | unplug" to it, which seemed to solve that problem until the
             | whole project was mothballed.
             | 
             | In the late 90s, I worked at a company where we started
             | getting complaints from the staff about machines being
             | getting slower over time. Nobody took it seriously until
             | there was an inventory of machines taken and we found that
             | a large amount had significantly less memory installed than
             | they should have, somebody was stealing half the memory
             | sticks from each. Hidden cameras were installed in the
             | office and it turned out that somebody on the cleaning crew
             | came with a screwdriver and ESD bags and knew how much to
             | take to leave the machines working.
        
               | bombcar wrote:
               | Goes again to show the usual thing that gets you caught
               | is repetition.
               | 
               | Had he struck once or twice and then left the rest alone
               | nobody may ever have figured it out.
        
               | lcnPylGDnU4H9OF wrote:
               | I would expect the repetition generally comes out of
               | necessity. If he's selling the parts to feed himself or
               | his family he's that much less likely to choose to stop
               | if it means giving up some source of income, however ill-
               | gotten.
        
               | bombcar wrote:
               | It's more likely from "I got away with it, I'll get away
               | with it again" - but I've not done deep research into
               | thefts, but the ones I know were along the lines of "I
               | need more money for more drugs, this will get me some
               | money".
        
             | Freestyler_3 wrote:
             | For critical devices you could use red outlets. Different
             | colored outlets are scary.
        
         | doctorhandshake wrote:
         | I had a similar experience: I have a permanent dynamic lighting
         | system installed in a food hall / night club. One day about a
         | year after installing the owner called to tell me a fixture was
         | on the blink. The following day, another, the following day,
         | more, but different ones. This was worrying as all the hardware
         | is custom and would be very hard to source replacements for. We
         | investigated lightning strike or other power surge related to
         | construction on the block, water damage, etc. Long story short
         | we found out that the new cleaner, who was VERY VERY thorough,
         | was pulling out the server rack to mop behind it nightly and
         | straining the cat cable terminations.
        
         | heywhatupboys wrote:
         | this is why denmark has an additional slanted plug for IT
         | equipment and a winky one for hospitals
        
           | genewitch wrote:
           | In the US the "winky" receptacles that go (-|) or ([?]|) -
           | except the T faces the other way - are 20 amp outlets, 120
           | volts. every receptacle that differs from the "shocked face"
           | means something. Our standard shocked face receptacles are
           | 15A. In hospitals, you need a guarantee that your monitors or
           | assistive devices aren't going to trip a breaker somewhere if
           | someone plugs in a vacuum; making it impossible to use the
           | receptacle for something else is something that only matters
           | after it's too late, i'd think.
        
             | fragmede wrote:
             | In hospitals, they're colored differently to denote which
             | sockets are on backed up lines vs not.
        
           | smcl wrote:
           | How can, say, a cleaner tell the prong configuration on a
           | plug when it's plugged in and not visible?
        
       | r0m4n0 wrote:
       | I'll add to the crazy anecdotes with something that happened to
       | me a few months ago.
       | 
       | I had a brand new AC/heater hvac system installed last year.
       | Encountered this problem, the AC would just turn off. First time,
       | called the AC company and they come out. After a few visits, they
       | pinpoint the problem as the condensation pump, it's just a small
       | water pump that's down in my basement to push water out a little
       | PVC pipe. When the water fills up in the reservoir, a pump kicks
       | on and moves water. If the water gets too full, a sensor turns
       | the AC off. After the rd visit they decide that "the grade isn't
       | gradual enough and the pump turns off". They replace the pvc.
       | Fourth attempt they replace the pump, pump must have failed.
       | Fifth visit, they replace the pump with a different brand. Sixth
       | visit they disconnect the automatic shutoff of the AC, my
       | basement floods with water. Seventh call they change the pvc pipe
       | again. Eighth call they are baffled, say everything is working as
       | it should, give it time.
       | 
       | After they leave, my wife goes "whenever I turn the basement
       | light on, I hear a weird noise". I immediately turn the switch
       | off and walk down into the basement and test the outlet. The
       | light oddly enough controls a random outlet the pump was
       | connected to. Every time a tech came over, they turned the switch
       | on.
       | 
       | I still wonder how many more phone calls it would have taken
       | before they figured it out.
        
         | BenjiWiebe wrote:
         | I've been enjoying these various comments but for me, yours
         | takes the cake. Thanks!
        
       | elzbardico wrote:
       | Well, I believe that we won't have funny customer support
       | histories like that from our age to post 40 years from now. At
       | least not from google et caterva.
        
       | azmarks wrote:
       | When I moved into my last house, I had a fun electrical problem.
       | We moved in October and I would end the day by taking the trash
       | out. Now, my garbage can was outside the door from my garage to
       | the backyard. One night the light outside that door didn't go on.
       | It was late, so I figured I'd look at it the next day. Worked
       | fine all day, then at night it didn't work again. It was a new
       | house, so I called the builder.
       | 
       | The electrician came out to check it and gave me the most
       | incredulous look when I told him it didn't work at night. But he
       | went to take a look. Came back later and said that the wire was
       | barely touching the light fixture. So, at night, when it go
       | colder it would slightly pull back and no longer be touching.
       | During the day it would warm up, expand and would work just fine.
        
         | genewitch wrote:
         | my wellhead does this when it's below 20F outside. Oxidization
         | on the wires throughout the year mean that any shift of the
         | wire causes a disconnect.
         | 
         | haven't figured out a solution, i just run a drip that is loud
         | enough i notice if it stops so i can go out and reseat the
         | wire, otherwise the stuff outside the well can freeze and that
         | costs money to replace.
        
           | c0nsumer wrote:
           | Sounds like you just need a better mechanical connection.
           | There are silicone-filled waterproof wire nuts available.
           | Maybe if you clean the wires and secure them with those all
           | will be good?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-09-21 23:02 UTC)