[HN Gopher] 'Less than half' fresh produce sold globally makes a...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       'Less than half' fresh produce sold globally makes any profit
        
       Author : jelliclesfarm
       Score  : 220 points
       Date   : 2023-09-20 07:15 UTC (15 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.fruitnet.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.fruitnet.com)
        
       | jeffbee wrote:
       | Yes, food is ridiculously cheap. Capitalism: it gets the job
       | done. Among American households, food costs as a fraction of
       | household disposable income fell by more than half in the last 50
       | years. Produce is commodities and the nature of commodities is
       | for all the profit to be removed from the system. A related fact
       | is agriculture as a fraction of GDP/GSP is close to zero in every
       | state. Only in Iowa is it even worth mentioning, and in that
       | state it's still not even 5% of the economy.
       | 
       | Any time you meet someone who wants to "decommodify food" you
       | know you're dealing with an idiot.
        
         | bannedbybros wrote:
         | [dead]
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | mrguyorama wrote:
         | >Capitalism: it gets the job done.
         | 
         | So you just ignore the billions in subsidies to keep food
         | cheap? That's capitalism now?
        
       | Tokkemon wrote:
       | Wasn't this a whole plot point in the Grapes of Wrath? People
       | starving while the farmers let the crops rot to keep the price
       | up?
        
       | andy_ppp wrote:
       | Sounds like all industries, the longer they have gone on the less
       | profitable they are. I'm not excusing ripping off farmers but it
       | seems to be a pattern in all industries i.e. textiles,
       | newspapers, building, car manufacturing, even most engineering...
       | unless there is constant technological innovation (or market
       | capture like the music industry) their profitability tends to
       | zero.
        
         | abigail95 wrote:
         | i'm not sure agricultural profit is tending towards zero, it
         | says half of it is profitable.
         | 
         | if i took a random assortment of companies, how many would be
         | profitable in a given year? half? two thirds?
        
       | lasermike026 wrote:
       | I eat some of my vegetables from a garden. We should eat what is
       | in season and not eat food that travels very far. Perhaps fruits
       | and vegetables are to expensive or unprofitable because we are
       | asking too much.
        
       | zosima wrote:
       | This has been in the cards for some time. It's also worth seeing
       | what the price hikes are:
       | 
       | "Those increases, the report says, were driven by costs of
       | fertilizer (up 60 per cent worldwide), construction (+48 per
       | cent), fuel and gas (+41 per cent), shipping rates (+40 per
       | cent), and electricity (+40 percent)."
       | 
       | A few of these may find their cause in the supply chain problems
       | during Covid, but most of them are driven by political factors:
       | 1. The transition to renewable energy and increased regulation
       | and taxation on fertilizer usage. 2. The war in Ukraine
       | 
       | Right now I see it as more and more likely that the starvation
       | and calamities that global warming was claimed to soon cause,
       | will instead be caused by the entirely misdirected attempts to
       | reduce CO2-emissions.
        
         | martin_a wrote:
         | You missed: 3. Greedflation
        
         | politelemon wrote:
         | > The war in Ukraine
         | 
         | I often see this used as a reason for affected things but I've
         | not seen it explained, so it must be self evident to many. What
         | about it is causing the price hikes? Do our goods flow through
         | it, is it affecting shipping routes? Is it a major provider of
         | most good or just some kinds?
        
           | willyt wrote:
           | It cut off the supply of cheap gas to Europe from Russia,
           | making the demand for gas from elsewhere spike which caused
           | global price rises. As well as gas being used for domestic
           | heating and cooking it's also used for industrial processes
           | that require cheap heat. Burning gas to power steam turbines
           | was one of the cheaper ways of making electricity.
        
           | JumpCrisscross wrote:
           | > _Is it a major provider of most good or just some kinds?_
           | 
           | Ukraine had a 10% export share in wheat between 2017 and 2021
           | [1]. They're also a particularly low-cost provider, which is
           | why they supply 40% of the World Food Programme's wheat [2].
           | 
           | [1] https://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2022/02/revisiting-
           | ukraine...
           | 
           | [2] https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/forty-percent-
           | world-f...
        
           | ralferoo wrote:
           | Ukraine was known as "the breadbasket of Europe" and the
           | majority of the crops grown there were exported. In
           | particular, grains such as wheat, corn and barley provide
           | approximately 10% of the world's supply.
           | 
           | From what I understood of the news, the exports weren't
           | massively affected in the first year or so of the war due to
           | a treaty with Russia that protected ships transporting grain
           | from attack. In the last couple of months, Russia announced
           | they weren't renewing that (yearly) treaty and would treat
           | foreign ships transporting as if they were warships, and so
           | viable military targets. As Russia has long had a massive sea
           | base at Sevastopol in the south-west of Ukraine (when it gave
           | Crimea to Ukraine in 1954, this base was kept as Russian
           | territory due its significant influence over the Black Sea),
           | this base is now a choke point for all sea vessels in and out
           | of Ukraine, which is probably why Ukraine is now stepping up
           | attacks here - because with the ending of the treaty, they
           | need that export route to stay open.
           | 
           | That last paragraph was a long winded way of saying that
           | actually, until recently, the war in Ukraine shouldn't have
           | affected the price of grain all that much, because it was
           | largely continuing as before, so any prior price increases
           | being blamed on the war were possibly just opportunistic.
           | With the ending of the treaty, it's not unlikely that there
           | will be significantly less grain exported, or more exported
           | over land, and so the price could increase. Obviously in the
           | situation where demand exceeds supply, price increases aren't
           | proportional to the reduction in supply, but based on the
           | willingness of buyers to pay more than someone else to secure
           | their supply, so the increases will probably be more
           | dramatic.
        
           | zosima wrote:
           | The war in Ukraine has majorly affected the prices of natural
           | gas.
           | 
           | Due to the european energy policy attempting to rely as much
           | as possible on renewable energy, gas is absolutely essential
           | for electricity production. It's the only energy source which
           | is reliable and can be turned on and off quickly in
           | situations where the renewable energy sources are not
           | producing energy, due to lack of sun, water or wind.
           | 
           | Furthermore natural gas is an essential ingredient in the
           | production of artificial fertilizer. It's estimated that
           | without artificial fertilizer, global agricultural production
           | will only be able to feed approximately 4 billion people.
        
         | eecc wrote:
         | Can't we not always turn anything into an attack against
         | climate action?
        
           | brutusborn wrote:
           | You may see it as an attack, but I see such comments as
           | essential to address.
           | 
           | If you want more climate action, you need to reduce political
           | opposition to it. Rising food prices due to rising energy
           | costs _will_ cause lots of people to stop caring about the
           | climate.
           | 
           | Activists trying to pretend issues such as this don't exist
           | is one of the reasons why people distrust climate activists.
        
       | myshpa wrote:
       | I think the structure of subsidies makes the problem worse.
       | 
       | The price of meat and healthy whole foods in the US is heavily
       | distorted by lobying [0] and by subsidies ($38 billion each year
       | to subsidize the meat and dairy industries, but only 0.04 percent
       | of that (i.e., $17 million) each year to subsidize fruits and
       | vegetables) [1].
       | 
       | [0] https://fortune.com/2023/07/21/why-healthy-food-so-
       | expensive...
       | 
       | [1] https://scet.berkeley.edu/wp-
       | content/uploads/CopyofFINALSavi...
        
       | gdubs wrote:
       | We purchased a farm many years ago that had become eroded after
       | many years of conventional farming. In our quest to transition to
       | regenerative practices, and things like organic, we've definitely
       | had the realization that most people have no idea where their
       | food comes from, or why it costs what it does.
       | 
       | The margins in most farming are razor thin. Our neighbors who
       | grow conventionally spend tons on inputs like fertilizer, for a
       | shockingly small amount of money [in return per acre]. A year of
       | extreme weather - more and more common - throws the whole thing
       | out the window.
       | 
       | People say they want organic, but then they balk at the price
       | without realizing how much labor goes into it when you're not
       | just spraying to control weeds (or, more shockingly, to stop
       | growth on your food crop at just the right time).
       | 
       | All of that said, a lot of the negativity directed toward anyone
       | who has the dream of growing their own food is often coming from
       | a conventional mindset. There are alternative approaches. A few
       | great books are "Permaculture" by Mollison, "One Straw
       | Revolution" by Fukuoka, "Restoration Agriculture" by Shephard.
       | 
       | As I mentioned elsewhere in the thread, it doesn't have to be
       | all-or-nothing - you can start with some perennial herbs on your
       | balcony. Larger scale, I'm an advocate for things like
       | agroforestry practices, becoming more and more interested in
       | agrivoltaics. You can go a very long way with a few dwarf fruit
       | and nut trees, an understory of berries, and a few raised beds
       | managed with no-dig methods.
       | 
       | If nothing else, you learn first-hand the challenges (and joys)
       | of growing food, become more connected to the world that sustains
       | us, and maybe gain a better appreciation for the people who work
       | really hard for very thin margins to keep us all fed.
        
         | tuatoru wrote:
         | > People say they want organic, but then they balk at the price
         | 
         | Yes; it's just virtue signaling. I tune out people who say this
         | stuff. If I'm sufficiently motivated I point out:-
         | 
         | It's not a value unless you're prepared for it to cost you
         | money.
        
           | fragmede wrote:
           | Who am I signaling to when I buy organic cucumbers and bring
           | them home and eat them by myself? The clerk at the checkout
           | counter?
        
           | coldpie wrote:
           | Eh, I don't think that's it. I think it's just good old
           | misinformation caused by skillful marketing. People think
           | organic is healthier or better for the environment, so they
           | prefer it, even though it's actually neither[1]. But it's
           | real tough to get past the huge marketing push conveying that
           | message for the past couple decades.
           | 
           | [1] https://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/more-
           | evidence-...
        
           | pastage wrote:
           | If you believe it it is not virtue signaling, and if you balk
           | at the price it is not virtue signaling. So not sure where
           | that idea comes from.
        
         | ch4s3 wrote:
         | To your point, you're talking about processes that while
         | impressive in many respects are HIGHLY labor intensive. The
         | benefits from modern agriculture are the low levels or required
         | human labor and the low prices, both of which free up most
         | people to do other things and to spend far less on food. In the
         | not distant past most Americans spent 30+% of their income on
         | food, which I doubt is a world many of us want to return to.
        
           | bbojan wrote:
           | > In the not distant past most Americans spent 30+% of their
           | income on food
           | 
           | And now they spend 30% of their income on medical costs.
        
           | Kerrick wrote:
           | 2022 median household income after taxes [0] was $64,240, or
           | $5,353/mo. According to the USDA [1], a moderate cost of food
           | prepared at home for a family of four (with, say, a 16 year
           | old daughter and 14 year old son) is $1,378.90/mo.
           | 
           | So, the median family on a moderate food plan (never eating
           | from restaurants) ALREADY spends 25% on food.
           | 
           | People who make less money, dine out, have more children, eat
           | more food, buy fancier food, or have food waste spend
           | proportionally even more. A lot of people who read and
           | comment here don't realize that there's no "return to" that
           | world -- lots of the U.S. already lives there.
           | 
           | [0]: https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2023/09/median-
           | househ...
           | 
           | [1]: https://fns-
           | prod.azureedge.us/sites/default/files/media/file... via
           | https://www.fns.usda.gov/cnpp/usda-food-plans-cost-food-
           | mont...
        
             | gbear605 wrote:
             | > a moderate cost of food prepared at home for a family of
             | four (with, say, a 16 year old daughter and 14 year old
             | son) is $1,378.90/mo
             | 
             | I'm not sure how they calculate that (and the page they
             | link to with information is down), but that really doesn't
             | make sense. For my five person household - five adults - we
             | spend about $800-1000/month on groceries. According to that
             | document, we'd be spending about $1400 on their low-cost
             | plan or $1750 on their moderate-cost plan. But we're not
             | low-cost: that's our costs shopping at a fairly upscale
             | grocery store (not Whole Foods, but above average on price)
             | and buying pretty fancy food. Maybe the costs assume no
             | bulk purchases split between multiple members of the
             | household?
        
             | ch4s3 wrote:
             | The USDA[1] shows Americans spending 11.3% of disposable
             | income on food.
             | 
             | To quote them:
             | 
             | >U.S. consumers spent an average of 11.3 percent of their
             | disposable personal income on food in 2022
             | 
             | [1] https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ag-and-food-
             | statistic...
        
               | Scoundreller wrote:
               | The median income is a lot lower than the average income.
               | 
               | Not even sure how food falls under disposable income.
               | Sounds like a cute way of saying "after-tax income" as if
               | "things to buy otherwise you die" is a luxury"?
               | 
               | From the chart after the one you quoted:
               | 
               | "In 2021, households in the lowest income quintile spent
               | an average of $4,875 on food (representing 30.6 percent
               | of income), while households in the highest income
               | quintile spent an average of $13,973 on food
               | (representing 7.6 percent of income)."
               | 
               | Pretty cool/sad to see the top 20% spending almost
               | 3x/household on food.
        
           | carlosjobim wrote:
           | I think spending 30+% of income on food is perfectly
           | sensible, while spending more than 10% on shelter is complete
           | madness. A house is built and stays there for decades without
           | any extra work to speak of, yet even the most primitive house
           | in industrialized nations is more expensive than an extremely
           | advanced motorcycle that can go 200mph without breaking
           | apart. Anybody can build a house by himself with primitive
           | tools, trees and stones, given some time. Almost nobody can
           | build a motorcycle by himself, even with advanced precision
           | tools and all instructions given. Not to mention computers,
           | cars and cell phones, which are tremendously advanced.
           | 
           | Considering the labour and resources needed to grow food,
           | compared to the labour and resources needed to build houses,
           | food should be much more of our expenses while housing should
           | be much less.
        
           | AnthonyMouse wrote:
           | > The benefits from modern agriculture are the low levels or
           | required human labor and the low prices, both of which free
           | up most people to do other things and to spend far less on
           | food.
           | 
           | I feel like it should be possible to have it both ways.
           | 
           | Right now we have a dichotomy with on one hand industrial
           | methods that overuse chemical fertilizers and pesticides, and
           | the other hand organic methods that are excessively labor-
           | intensive.
           | 
           | Why is it not possible to use the organic methods, but
           | automate the labor-intensive parts? I understand that we
           | don't currently have the technology to do this, but is there
           | some reason it isn't _possible_? Wouldn 't it be a productive
           | thing to fund the development of?
        
           | m463 wrote:
           | What if cheap food gets you sick in some way, or gives you
           | cancer?
        
             | ch4s3 wrote:
             | I'm not sure what your point is.
        
               | m463 wrote:
               | My point is that labor saving efficiency may take a hit
               | producing healthy food.
               | 
               | For example, if instead of fighting insects directly,
               | everything is soaked in glyphosate, it might be too much
               | of a compromise.
               | 
               | In fact there are lots of these compromises that end up
               | killing fiber, or favoring starches or processing away
               | nutrients that makes eating a faustian bargain.
               | 
               | I would think labor-saving solutions should try to get
               | whole foods to the table quickly and cheaply, rather than
               | say maximizing shelf life or storage convenience.
        
           | dmoy wrote:
           | > In the not distant past most Americans spent 30+% of their
           | income on food, which I doubt is a world many of us want to
           | return to.
           | 
           | Not only that, but as recently as like 100 years ago, 30% of
           | _people_ in the US were farmers (ish).
        
           | RangerScience wrote:
           | > In the not distant past most Americans spent 30+% of their
           | income on food, which I doubt is a world many of us want to
           | return to.
           | 
           | I mean - I think I understand the motivation behind that
           | _but_
           | 
           | I am pretty convinced that the value of "low-carb" / "no-
           | carb" diets has less to do with the impact of carbs (after
           | all, wheat _literally_ was the symbol of European
           | civilization for a really long time) and more to do with how
           | they 're used as cheap caloric filler (looking at you, Panda
           | Express). Pretty much a "get what you pay for" kind of
           | situation, in my eyes - so maybe spending that much on food
           | isn't as bad as was thought.
           | 
           | also, on the gripping hand, _looks at cost of housing_ - so
           | maybe if it 's not one thing it's another.
        
             | ilyt wrote:
             | I think it's mostly that this kind of food is also easily
             | and quickly digestible which just means getting hungry
             | earlier.
        
             | ch4s3 wrote:
             | Even high quality food is far cheaper than it was only a
             | generation or two ago.
        
               | bbojan wrote:
               | What quality are you talking about? In my 8 years in
               | Canada I wasn't able to by decent blackberries or
               | tomatoes. At any price.
        
               | hotnfresh wrote:
               | 30 years ago (within that generation-or-two span), at
               | least here in the parts of the US I was in around that
               | time, blackberries and lots of other stuff were both
               | expensive, and only available seasonally. You could get
               | canned year-round, not fresh.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | Aerroon wrote:
             | But were those Europeans healthy? We can see a life
             | expectancy and height increase in most European countries
             | these days. And this is with us having subpar diets where
             | most people get insufficient amounts of some pretty
             | important stuff like magnesium and vitamin D.
        
           | gdubs wrote:
           | I think modern agriculture is miraculous, don't get me wrong.
           | But we ignore the negative externalities - the cost to our
           | health, and to ecosystems, and to the sustainability of
           | civilization long-term. Even conventionally-minded farmers
           | know that things like soil loss are a huge looming problem.
           | And the labor issue is also complex - while big corn fields
           | may be farmable via GPS-enabled, air-conditioned tractors,
           | there's still a ton of migrant labor without which the system
           | would cease to function.
           | 
           | The idea behind a lot of the regenerative methods is to work
           | with nature to reduce the need for inputs. I am a pragmatist
           | and will tell you that, it's really hard! On this I agree.
           | But a lot of the ideas from more fringe communities like
           | permaculturists are becoming more and more integrated into
           | the mainstream. I just think we need to accelerate that, and
           | put a lot more research into alternative methods like
           | agroforestry - because I think we all rely on a food system
           | that's way more brittle and tenuous than people realize. One
           | with a lot of negative externalities that we can't paper over
           | forever.
        
             | ch4s3 wrote:
             | > the cost to our health
             | 
             | This seems highly debatable. Sure cheap calories and cheap
             | corn based sugars make it easy to develop so called
             | lifestyle diseases, but on the other hand we've essentially
             | eliminated famine and in most parts of the world
             | malnutrition.
             | 
             | In terms of ecosystem loss, it seems to me that
             | concentrating most calorie production onto the smallest
             | amount of land makes sense.
             | 
             | > And the labor issue is also complex
             | 
             | You're right of course, but I don't see how the manually
             | intense process of regenerative and/or organic ag makes
             | this better. Every small farm like this that I'm aware of
             | makes heavy use of children, unpaid interns, and extremely
             | low wage workers. It's not exactly comparable to migrant
             | workers picking strawberries en-masse, but that's more of
             | an issue of sacle and where these boutique farms find their
             | labor IMO. I say this as someone whose parents and
             | grandparents were all farmers, and my sister-in-law worked
             | for a few years on a regenerative/organic farm.
             | 
             | > But a lot of the ideas from more fringe communities like
             | permaculturists are becoming more and more integrated into
             | the mainstream
             | 
             | This is the part that's actually really interesting to me.
             | Finding ways to scale up and integrate ideas about soil
             | health, water use, etc into mechanized, large scale
             | agriculture is really great. People seem to be doing cool
             | things with no-till and drip irrigation right now.
             | 
             | > alternative methods like agroforestry
             | 
             | My concern with this is that it definitely require LOADS of
             | labor, and isn't likely to produce that much food. It also
             | may put pressure on forest land may not be sustainable long
             | term. On a small scale on you your own farm, it's probably
             | great. But I have trouble imagining how it could ever make
             | up a significant portion of overall fruit and nut
             | consumption.
        
               | CuriouslyC wrote:
               | > In terms of ecosystem loss, it seems to me that
               | concentrating most calorie production onto the smallest
               | amount of land makes sense.
               | 
               | Incorrect. Agroforestry is the practice of integrating
               | livestock and orchards. The orchard is designed to serve
               | as the basis for an extended ecosystem. Trees provide
               | shade for fowl, sheep and small cows and help limit swale
               | evaporation. Fallen fruits attract a wide variety of
               | animals and birds, providing prey for cats, hawks and
               | owls. Systems like this sustainably produce a high
               | quantity and quality of food per acre while encouraging
               | diversity and natural beauty, at the cost of being less
               | accessible to automated farm machinery. The best case
               | scenario for sustainability and diversity would be if
               | everyone lived in small communities with shared food
               | forests, eating mostly locally grown food.
        
               | wayfinder wrote:
               | Truthfully, as someone who has done a lot small scale
               | growing between over the last few years, using everything
               | from soil to hydroponics, I find it hard to believe that
               | natural techniques will ever come close to mechanization
               | and artificial means. Pesticides and chemical
               | fertilization are so extremely effective. You get hand
               | over fist yield with them.
               | 
               | A world with shared food forests and locally grown food
               | is probably a world with far fewer people.
               | 
               | I think high population and natural farming are mutually
               | exclusive.
        
               | switchbak wrote:
               | Well in the western world, we're going to have a pretty
               | marked decrease in population pretty soon. That also
               | means fewer people to work the land (among other serious
               | challenges), but it appears overpopulation will not be
               | one of those problems to the same degree.
               | 
               | And the state of industrial AG isn't static, robotic
               | micro pesticides are interesting for example. Not that
               | I'm a fan of them, but it would be great to see us move
               | away from showering everything in loads of agent orange
               | and have more targeted application.
        
               | petsfed wrote:
               | >Sure cheap calories and cheap corn based sugars make it
               | easy to develop so called lifestyle diseases, but on the
               | other hand we've essentially eliminated famine and in
               | most parts of the world malnutrition.
               | 
               | I think this is letting the good be the enemy of the
               | perfect (a rare construction, to be sure). Yes, we've
               | solved a very bad 1st order problem. That frees us up to
               | work on 2nd order problems that we've never had to deal
               | with before. This is a thalidomide-style problem in that
               | the side-effects of the "cure" are a disease in their own
               | right.
               | 
               | I'd rather have diabetes than be dead, certainly, but
               | wouldn't it better to not risk diabetes just to stay
               | alive?
               | 
               | I'm substantially in agreement with you though. The less
               | land we use on food production, the better. The less
               | labor we can expend growing and harvesting that food, the
               | better.
               | 
               | All of that said, the parameter space of agriculture has
               | a complicated shape, so optimizing for any one parameter
               | will be at the expense of other parameters.
        
               | robertlagrant wrote:
               | > wouldn't it better to not risk diabetes just to stay
               | alive?
               | 
               | This is a mischaracterisation. If you have any choice in
               | what you eat, you risk diabetes just to stay alive.
               | 
               | There is so much food that far fewer people are dying of
               | malnutrition than in the past. As part of there being
               | lots of food available, it's also possible to eat
               | yourself into heart disease and type 2 diabetes. Great
               | availability requires some responsibility.
        
               | ddorian43 wrote:
               | Type 2 diabetes is solved with low carb and you can use
               | the cheap food. See virtahealth.com if you want
               | professional help.
        
               | ch4s3 wrote:
               | > I think this is letting the good be the enemy of the
               | perfect (a rare construction, to be sure). Yes, we've
               | solved a very bad 1st order problem. That frees us up to
               | work on 2nd order problems that we've never had to deal
               | with before. This is a thalidomide-style problem in that
               | the side-effects of the "cure" are a disease in their own
               | right.
               | 
               | I actually agree with you.
               | 
               | > I'd rather have diabetes than be dead, certainly, but
               | wouldn't it better to not risk diabetes just to stay
               | alive?
               | 
               | Again I agree, but I also think there's a huge cultural
               | component to food/eating that is often missed in these
               | discussions.
        
             | myshpa wrote:
             | > But we ignore the negative externalities - the cost to
             | our health, and to ecosystems, and to the sustainability of
             | civilization long-term
             | 
             | Agriculture production as a major driver of the Earth
             | system exceeding planetary boundaries
             | 
             | https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320356605_Agricult
             | u...
             | 
             | Our global food system is the primary driver of
             | biodiversity loss
             | 
             | https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/our-
             | glob...
             | 
             | Biodiversity conservation: The key is reducing meat
             | consumption
             | 
             | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26231772/
             | 
             | Humans are driving one million species to extinction -
             | United Nations-backed report finds that agriculture is one
             | of the biggest threats to Earth's ecosystems
             | 
             | https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01448-4
        
               | jampekka wrote:
               | Quite obvious solution to these would be to transition to
               | plant based diet which would reduce agricultural land use
               | by 75%.
               | 
               | https://ourworldindata.org/land-use-diets
        
               | hattmall wrote:
               | But what do we need the land for? There's tons of empty
               | land, grazing animals are beneficial for the land. Why
               | would we need 75% more empty land?
        
               | digging wrote:
               | > There's tons of empty land
               | 
               | Your premise is flawed... outside of Antarctica, there's
               | not really much empty land on earth.
        
               | myshpa wrote:
               | > But what do we need the land for
               | 
               | We should reforest most of that land. It was previously
               | mostly forested anyway, and doing so, together with a
               | rapid phase-out of fossil fuels, would enable us to store
               | enough carbon to halt global warming, restore
               | biodiversity, and repair the water cycle to prevent
               | droughts.
               | 
               | https://ourworldindata.org/deforestation#the-world-has-
               | lost-...
               | 
               | > grazing animals are beneficial for the land
               | 
               | Not really.
               | 
               | https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/publications/grazed-
               | and-co...
               | 
               | https://newrepublic.com/article/163735/myth-regenerative-
               | ran...
               | 
               | https://grist.org/climate-energy/cattle-grazing-is-a-
               | climate...
        
               | bartwe wrote:
               | Farming for an ever growing population.
        
               | ilyt wrote:
               | Developed countries have dwindling population (well, at
               | least exclusing immigration). And I think it's safe to
               | assume when other countries catch up similar thing will
               | happen, at the very least to the point of levelling up.
               | Hell even India, the biggest country by number of people,
               | is already at 2.0
               | 
               | We don't need to feed more, we just need to bring the
               | education and standard of living if the world up. And
               | maybe figure out how to make the people in developed
               | countries to have sustainable birth rate...
        
               | PKop wrote:
               | Why is endless growth desirable? Why not quality over
               | quantity, allowing for higher quality food supply instead
               | of mass production of with unhealthy trade-offs?
        
               | ch4s3 wrote:
               | To steel man a bit here, grazing isn't necessarily a win
               | for biodiversity and then there is all of the land that
               | used to produce supplemental feed. Its a set of problems
               | worth considering, even as I disagree with the myopia of
               | the link riddled comment above.
        
               | ch4s3 wrote:
               | You could boil all of this down to the fact that our
               | current best effort at feeding 9 billion people has a lot
               | of unfortunate externalities. If your proposal is to
               | revert back to high land and labor input methods, then
               | maybe it would make a difference insofar as a few billion
               | people would probably starve. For my part, I'd prefer we
               | try innovating our way through it.
        
               | Loic wrote:
               | No. Just reduce your meat consumption to about 1kg per
               | month or less. You can still enjoy a really good steak
               | from times to times and you reduce your load on the
               | ecosystem massively.
               | 
               | This is orthogonal to the way you produce food.
        
               | ch4s3 wrote:
               | That's quite the presumption about MY consumption.
               | Moreover the word "just" is doing a lot of work here.
               | 
               | I'm responding primarily to the overall land use picture
               | here. Agriculture even as efficiently as we're doing it
               | now takes a lot of space, even removing most meat from
               | the equation.
        
               | myshpa wrote:
               | > You could boil all of this down to the fact that our
               | current best effort at feeding 9 billion people has a lot
               | of unfortunate externalities.
               | 
               | Feeding 10 billion people by 2050 within planetary limits
               | may be achievable
               | 
               | https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/917471
               | 
               |  _A global shift towards healthy and more plant-based
               | diets, halving food loss and waste, and improving farming
               | practices and technologies are required to feed 10
               | billion people sustainably by 2050, a new study finds._
               | 
               | > If your proposal is to revert back to high land and
               | labor input methods, then maybe it would make a
               | difference insofar as a few billion people would probably
               | starve.
               | 
               | Not necessarily. The crop lands we already have would be
               | sufficient to feed the whole population.
               | 
               | https://ourworldindata.org/land-use-diets
               | 
               | Sustainable and regenerative agriculture is entirely
               | possible. You may want to explore practices such as
               | natural, syntropic, permaculture, and agroforestry
               | farming, to name just a few. While it may require more
               | knowledge and labor, advancements in technology and
               | automation could potentially mean only a slight increase
               | in the workforce, from around 2% to maybe upto 4%.
               | 
               | The benefits would be enormous. And with 40-70% of jobs
               | being bullshit jobs I'm not even afraid we would fill
               | those positions. It's just a matter of regulation and
               | preferences.
               | 
               | > For my part, I'd prefer we try innovating our way
               | through it.
               | 
               | Plant-based diets are an innovation. Restorative
               | agriculture would require new machinery, agroforestry,
               | smaller fields instead of vast monocultures, the
               | incorporation of companion/nitrogen-fixing plants and
               | compost instead of artificial fertilizers, among other
               | changes. Many things would need to change.
               | 
               | > I'm responding primarily to the overall land use
               | picture here. Agriculture even as efficiently as we're
               | doing it now takes a lot of space, even removing most
               | meat from the equation.
               | 
               | This is a very illustrative picture.
               | 
               | https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2013/10/World-Map-by-
               | Land...
               | 
               | Animal ag. brings just 18% of calories and 36% of
               | proteins, while destroying and polluting so much. We
               | should dedicate the land to forests (carbon
               | sequestration) and to the restoration of biodiversity.
        
               | ch4s3 wrote:
               | My whole point and I discussed this up thread is that
               | things like restorative agriculture and agroforestry
               | require a fuck-ton more human labor.
               | 
               | > The benefits would be enormous. And with 40-70% of jobs
               | being bullshit jobs I'm not even afraid we would fill
               | those positions. It's just a matter of regulation and
               | preferences.
               | 
               | This is total nonsense. When most people worked on farms,
               | food comprised more than 30% of peoples' budgets. The
               | idea that we could have a modern society with 40-70% of
               | people shifting to agricultural labor is on its face
               | ridiculous. You're making a utopian argument here and
               | hand waving away the real problems involved in sending so
               | many people back to agriculture.
               | 
               | > Plant-based diets are an innovation
               | 
               | Nowhere am I arguing against plant-based diets. You're
               | arguing against a straw man. I'm also not anywhere here
               | or at any point saying that the status quo of human
               | calorie composition is ideal. I said that as it stands,
               | our best effort to date to feed 8+ billion people has AT
               | PRESENT negative externalities. I agree that problems are
               | worth addressing, and you seem to be dead set on having
               | an argument with me about something I'm not saying.
        
               | myshpa wrote:
               | > the idea that we could have a modern society with
               | 40-70% of people shifting to agricultural labor is on its
               | face ridiculous
               | 
               | I never said we'd need 40-70% of people in the
               | agriculture. I've talked about the possibility of the
               | increase upto aproximately 4% , with a pool of 40-70%
               | people to choose from. Is it clearer now?
               | 
               | > you seem to be dead set on having an argument with me
               | about something I'm not saying
               | 
               | Ditto :)
               | 
               | > If your proposal is to revert back to high land and
               | labor input methods, then maybe it would make a
               | difference insofar as a few billion people would probably
               | starve. For my part, I'd prefer we try innovating our way
               | through it.
               | 
               | This has triggered my response. I can't agree with that
               | at all.
               | 
               | There's no need to revert to high land and labor input
               | methods. I'll simplify a lot. We could grow more veggies
               | and fruit, plant more nut orchards to replace milk, grow
               | more legumes to replace meat, on smaller fields separated
               | with rows of productive and nitrogen fixing trees
               | (agroforesty) and reforest more lands to let biodiversity
               | rebound and work with it, not against it ... nothing that
               | is particulary hard and nothing of that means that
               | billions would have to die. It would need new (smaller)
               | electric machines and more workers, but maybe 1-2 times
               | more, not 20 times more.
        
               | jononomo wrote:
               | I only eat steak. It is simply the best food for human
               | flourishing.
        
           | Phenomenit wrote:
           | I wouldn't mind spending a couple of hours a day doing
           | physical labor instead of working in the office to guarantee
           | that my food was made in a sustainable and safe way, heck I
           | even think it would be good for my health.
        
             | digging wrote:
             | My dream: we give up on bullshit jobs. We implement UBI. We
             | localize the majority of our agriculture. Humans, largely
             | freed from fake labor, work communally on their local
             | farms, splitting up the labor so nobody has to wreck their
             | health and finances gambling on a lettuce crop.
        
             | OfSanguineFire wrote:
             | That is a lot harder to say after the age of 35 or 40. My
             | social circle includes many alternative people in organic
             | farming where I have occasionally pitched in to help, and I
             | have also volunteered with WWOOF for food and accommodation
             | when traveling. This kind of work, even if a mere couple of
             | hours a day, really, really starts to suck after your knees
             | and back begin to age. And it is not that I have given up
             | and settled into a sedentary lifestyle - nowadays my
             | travels are bikepacking/bicycle-touring where I do 100 km+
             | day after day, but that exercise is a lot easier on one's
             | body than the repetitive motions of farming.
        
           | ilyt wrote:
           | Then why they are still getting subsidies ? We're essentially
           | taking a part of the tax, give it to farmers, so instead of
           | paying less tax we pay less for foods, except wasting a ton
           | of it along the way for bureaucracy
        
         | WalterBright wrote:
         | A friend of mine in the apple business says you get 4 bad years
         | in a row and then one great year to cover the 4 bad ones and
         | make an overall profit. The weather is the main variable that
         | can't be controlled.
        
           | ilyt wrote:
           | > A friend of mine in the apple business says you get 4 bad
           | years in a row and then one great year to cover the 4 bad
           | ones and make an overall profit. The weather is the main
           | variable that can't be controlled.
           | 
           | From my memory the years where crops were unusually high were
           | also ones where price was shit... because everyone else
           | nearby also had a good crop
        
           | selectodude wrote:
           | Apples are unusual insofar as they can be stored for 12+
           | months. Most produce isn't so resilient.
        
             | ilyt wrote:
             | Yeah it's crazy. My late dad's old farm just had basically
             | a big room that had concrete crating above a hole in soil
             | (I believe it was to just keep it cool in the warmer
             | months) and they could be stored from autumn to spring. No
             | AC of any sort, just a small furnace to give off a bit of
             | heat when winter gets really cold and some big fans for
             | forced ventilation.
        
           | kolanos wrote:
           | This is very true, a late frost can wipe you out for the
           | year.
        
           | digging wrote:
           | > The weather is the main variable that can't be controlled.
           | 
           | This is what's extremely concerning - weather is getting less
           | predictable every year. In a decade, who's going to want to
           | start a farm when they have no idea what their local climate
           | is?
        
         | matwood wrote:
         | People may like/not like Jeremy Clarkson, but his show on
         | Amazon about him buying a farm was fun and informative. He's
         | rich (so has a lot of startup capital) and struggled the whole
         | show trying to make the economics work. He also spoke with
         | other local farmers so you got to hear their struggles with the
         | economics.
        
           | robohoe wrote:
           | Check out Harry Metcalfe's Harry's Farm on Youtube for more
           | insight into British farming. It's a serious version of
           | Clarkson's Farm. It's eye opening how much bureaucracy comes
           | from politicians towards farmers.
        
             | [deleted]
        
           | gdubs wrote:
           | I actually really loved his show. It does a good job of
           | showing how hard it is. He farms a bit conventionally, but
           | he's also keen to try things that are regenerative - from his
           | hedge rows and pollinator crops, to his second season quest
           | to create a locavore restaurant that would support the
           | farmers in his area. He's constantly playing up his persona
           | of petrol-powered gear head to set up a joke at his expense
           | that says, "actually, maybe this sustainable approach _isn't_
           | so bad." Say what you will about Clarkson the person, but the
           | show seems to have done a lot of good in raising awareness
           | around the issues that farmers are facing, particularly in a
           | post-brexit UK.
        
           | ndsipa_pomu wrote:
           | Jeremy Clarkson plays an arsehole in the media (or is he
           | really such an arsehole?) but I agree about his farming show.
           | It's funny, instructive and touching at times. However, I
           | also found him funny on Top Gear - maybe it's because I
           | assume he was being ironic.
        
             | notatoad wrote:
             | He got fired from Top Gear because he punched a waiter for
             | bringing him a steak that wasn't hot enough.
             | 
             | The asshole thing is probably not just an act.
        
               | solumunus wrote:
               | You're exaggerating a bit. He punched a producer for the
               | show who was responsible for organising catering, it
               | wasn't a random waiter. A random waiter would be much
               | worse. Who knows what relationship he had with that
               | producer previous to the incident... He is (probably) an
               | arsehole but let's be accurate.
        
               | boringg wrote:
               | I appreciate this -- I come to HN for accuracy.
        
               | AmVess wrote:
               | Not to defend his actions, but his mom died and he went
               | through a divorce when this happened. Stress and a bit
               | deep in the cup made him lose his composure.
        
               | ckozlowski wrote:
               | Indeed. I don't think his actions were called for either,
               | but I appreciated that he apologized profusely
               | afterwards, and pointed said - repeatedly - that the
               | producer hadn't done anything wrong and that his fans
               | needed to leave the producer alone. I appreciated that he
               | seriously tried to make amends and didn't try to shove
               | blame on the other guy.
        
               | ilyt wrote:
               | Where you're getting your "facts" from, Daily Vomit ?
        
               | TylerE wrote:
               | History suggests it's never _just_ an act.
        
               | robertlagrant wrote:
               | Trust the history! It _suggests_. What more do you want?
        
               | skilled wrote:
               | Going to have to correct you. Life is a grand theater and
               | everything is an act. History has never suggested
               | otherwise.
        
             | ckozlowski wrote:
             | He often was. Like any challenge or segment with his
             | tagline "I mean, _really_? How hard can it be? " where he'd
             | leverage his critical person to point out "Yes, it's
             | actually really hard."
        
             | ilyt wrote:
             | He's definitely at least a bit of an arsehole looking at
             | his co-worker interviews.
             | 
             | But the the big dumb ass getting himself into trouble is
             | funny.
        
         | pj_mukh wrote:
         | Is the cost mostly driven by labor? How much can autonomous
         | pickers and "sharp shooting" spray robots/weeders help here?
         | 
         | I personally don't find gardening that attractive and don't see
         | how that is a scalable solution anyway, but have been curious
         | what larger farms can do to become more efficiently organic.
        
         | moralestapia wrote:
         | >"Restoration Agriculture" by Shephard
         | 
         | +1 to that book.
         | 
         | I don't have a farm (wish to, but life is very busy atm) and is
         | still a book I enjoyed quite a lot. Anyone could get a lot of
         | knowledge out of it.
        
         | talkingtab wrote:
         | Food prices seem irrational. And I mean that - they are not
         | reasonable. People buy bags of potato chips for almost $5.00.
         | How much does the potato cost? It seems like the potato has
         | nothing to do with the cost - especially if we reflect on the
         | idea that "less than have of the produce ... makes a profit".
         | 
         | What that means or appears to mean is that the cost of food
         | goods is now driven by cost of production. And we may be
         | underestimating that cost. Perhaps most cost of the potato cost
         | is in the gas, fertilizer, equipment that go into growing the
         | potato.
         | 
         | My question is, of the $5.00 for a bag of potato chips, where
         | does that money go? Cui bono?
        
           | ilyt wrote:
           | The making of a potato is subsidized from taxes so it can be
           | sold for "cheap".
           | 
           | There is no subsidies for making chips, and it is "a treat"
           | so there is not _all_ that much reason to make it cheap aside
           | from competition
        
           | SL61 wrote:
           | Chips, along with cereal, are an interesting case where the
           | normal price is crazy high but then they go on sale for a
           | fraction of that with extreme frequency.
           | 
           | There's a store near me that has had a particular $5 chip
           | brand on sale for $2 for well over a year. For cereal, I just
           | go to the cereal aisle and take my pick from the substantial
           | range of cereals that are 50% off at any given time. You're
           | only paying full price if you're picky and insist on one
           | specific item, which to be fair maybe a lot of people are
           | like that.
           | 
           | I'm sure the sales are loss leaders to get people in the
           | store, but I have to wonder if the people who pay $5 are to
           | some extent subsidizing the people who buy them for $2. Most
           | other categories of goods don't seem to go on sale with such
           | frequency or with such deep discounts.
        
           | sokoloff wrote:
           | People buy hot water poured over roasted and ground up beans
           | for $5+.
           | 
           | People buy tap water in plastic bottles at a ballgame for
           | $5+.
           | 
           | I do not conclude from those facts that "that means or
           | appears to mean is that the cost of food goods is now driven
           | by cost of production".
           | 
           | People are willing to pay for convenience and comfort. A bag
           | of chips, a cup of Starbucks, or a bottle of cold water at a
           | ballgame represents comfort and convenience.
        
           | Tycho wrote:
           | Food is the one thing on which the average citizen regularly
           | spends 10x or even 100x more than they need to spend.
        
         | Waterluvian wrote:
         | This is what surprised and humbled me about farming.
         | 
         | Imagine if my software dev laptop at home cost $5M and every
         | year if my compiled code crop doesn't come in I have to deal
         | with a ton of insurance paperwork to hopefully not go bankrupt.
         | 
         | It's like a high stakes career for low stakes payouts.
        
         | spelunker wrote:
         | I have a vegetable garden at home, and there is nothing quite
         | like eating food you have grown yourself! And as an extra
         | benefit, it usually tastes better than the stuff you get at the
         | grocery store anyway.
         | 
         | Even a small garden takes work, though, not to mention if you
         | keep it "organic" like I do, you have to deal with pests,
         | weeds, etc. So many weeds.
        
         | mortureb wrote:
         | I tried organic just for the family. It's next to impossible to
         | keep plants alive and weeds out. How did people do it before
         | NPK and glyphosate? It's probably climate dependent and
         | contingent on not having cross continental pests. The first
         | year Japanese beetles pretty much ate my whole crop over the
         | span of 3 weeks.
        
           | nightfly wrote:
           | > How did people do it before NPK and glyphosate
           | 
           | Compost/manure and lots of manual labor
        
             | mortureb wrote:
             | Yeah, I still think not having every pest and weed from
             | Asia helped as well. Most of the weeds and pests on my
             | property are some combination of Japanese/Chinese/Asian
             | ____.
        
         | crazygringo wrote:
         | > _we 've definitely had the realization that most people have
         | no idea where their food comes from, or why it costs what it
         | does._
         | 
         | I think most people think it comes from big factory farms?
         | 
         | And that it costs what it does because of supply and demand
         | like any industry, but that subsidies make certain things like
         | corn cheaper, and there's tremendous fluctuations in certain
         | prices (like berries) because there are wildly different levels
         | of supply coming from different countries at different times.
         | 
         | Are you suggesting it's not that?
        
         | alex_lav wrote:
         | I appreciate the sentiment of your post, but I feel like we're
         | living in the wrong time to be shaming the common person for
         | A.) Wanting food that won't kill them, and B.) They can afford.
         | 
         | > People say they want organic, but then they balk at the price
         | 
         | Everything in life is getting more expensive and wages stay
         | mostly the same.
        
         | jononomo wrote:
         | Doesn't it make more sense just to ditch plant-based calories
         | altogether and just focus on animal-based calories, which are
         | so much more nutrient dense while also being dramatically
         | better for the environment?
        
           | hfsh wrote:
           | > while also being dramatically better for the environment?
           | 
           | [citation very fucking much needed]
        
         | ilyt wrote:
         | > All of that said, a lot of the negativity directed toward
         | anyone who has the dream of growing their own food is often
         | coming from a conventional mindset.
         | 
         | The most I saw was mostly "well fuck you mister rich guy that
         | can not only afford a house but enough space to do so and have
         | the job to pay for that hobby"... not anything related to
         | farming methods
         | 
         | > If nothing else, you learn first-hand the challenges (and
         | joys) of growing food, become more connected to the world that
         | sustains us, and maybe gain a better appreciation for the
         | people who work really hard for very thin margins to keep us
         | all fed.
         | 
         | I've lived on a "farm" (it had a bit of everything, grain,
         | fruit trees, cucumbers etc) that was around 10 hectares. It
         | went from "good living" (actually affordin new-if-cheap car
         | etc.) to "going by" to my father basically selling land for
         | development and getting "normal" job because it just wasn't
         | paying.
         | 
         | Frankly I think current subsidies structure just made it worse
         | and worse because farming on low scale is near-impossible to
         | make profitable and even bigger ones live on small profit
         | margins as stuff from subsidies just immediately gets burn on
         | fertilizer and other stuff.
         | 
         | But yeah if average person did a year of farming and a year of
         | designing and making something difficult we'd live in far less
         | annoying stuf
        
         | WatchDog wrote:
         | Tangent: Is there such a thing as "organic" for people that
         | don't mind GMO, or fertilizer, but don't want their food
         | sprayed with pesticides?
        
           | belinder wrote:
           | Farmers market?
        
             | vkou wrote:
             | Nearly all of whom use pesticides.
        
               | ilyt wrote:
               | Well if you want your fruits without worms in it, you
               | have to.
               | 
               | I remember from my life at farm that even just spraying
               | it few days too late basically "ruined" a lot of fruit
        
           | atdrummond wrote:
           | Most organic certification programs allow (or even require)
           | the use of pesticides; they simply use those which are
           | considered "natural".
           | 
           | Some of these allowed pesticides, like copper sulfate, are
           | far more carcinogenic than even the compounds (glyphosate,
           | for example) that are considered dangerous enough to warrant
           | public concern campaigns.[1]
           | 
           | [1] https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2020/07/23/organic-
           | fungic...
        
             | mrob wrote:
             | It's possible that copper sulfate is more dangerous than
             | the alternatives, but there's no evidence that it's
             | carcinogenic. Your linked article claims copper sulfate
             | "has not been associated with cancer".
        
               | atdrummond wrote:
               | Thanks for catching; I was doing some changing of my
               | wording and forgot to finish it before submitting my
               | comment. I had meant to type "far more deleterious to
               | health, if not specifically oncogenic/carcinogenic [...]"
               | 
               | I did not mean to state copper sulfate (or any of the
               | organic farming compounds) is cancer causing and I would
               | f have fixed the typo if I was still within the edit
               | window.
        
           | kornhole wrote:
           | Pesticide free
        
           | slothtrop wrote:
           | The advantages of organic for produce are anywhere between
           | dubious or marginal. I would have said there's it's better
           | with animal products, but that's largely owing to the overlap
           | with free range / grass-fed. I don't really care if the grain
           | they happen to eat is also "organic".
           | 
           | In conventional farming conditions are so bad for pork that a
           | large percentage of them die of disease, despite all the
           | anti-biotics, before even heading to the butcher. I feel less
           | inclined to touch that stuff unless it's from a local farm I
           | know. Poultry and beef have their own set of problems.
        
         | tennisflyi wrote:
         | People balk at "organic" furniture, too. The cost of things has
         | just been abstracted too much.
        
         | hmmokidk wrote:
         | What do you think of hydroponic? Like simple kratky + grow
         | light, indoors you generally don't have to worry about pests.
        
           | gdubs wrote:
           | I think it's fascinating and looks like something an engineer
           | / designer could have a lot of fun with. And on a larger
           | scale, it seems like a really interesting idea that could
           | bring food production closer to where people are - like
           | cities. That said, I haven't had time to personally mess
           | around with it much yet.
           | 
           | I do think after watching how unpredictable the weather is
           | getting, that greenhouses and indoor growing will be a very
           | important part of the puzzle in the mid to later parts of
           | this century. I worry about the grain crops and things that
           | are still very much an outdoor proposition. Genetic
           | modification and experiments with different perennials may
           | get us to a place of resiliency, but we're not there yet.
           | 
           | FWIW, I'm not anti-GMO. But I think an issue with GMOs is
           | that a lot of what it gets used for is making crops tolerant
           | of tons of chemical spraying.
        
           | ilyt wrote:
           | It's land efficient. And only land efficient.
           | 
           | If we get a lot of cheap energy it might make sense if it
           | would allow to basically free up the land for farming.
           | 
           | But as long as land is not "expensive", it's just too
           | expensive in comparison.
           | 
           | Sun is free and land is cheap, tons of plastic, bulbs and
           | infrastructure is not.
        
         | thomastjeffery wrote:
         | That's the trouble with capitalism: basic needs are
         | underpriced, because income rates have no floor.
         | 
         | If people are allowed to be too poor to afford food, then the
         | system has failed. Our solution is not to pay people enough to
         | live: our solution is to make food cheap enough for the
         | desperately poor to continue living in squalor.
         | 
         | It's no wonder to me that the very people invested in
         | perpetuating this system are constantly struggling to "solve"
         | homelessness and healthcare by "creating more jobs".
        
           | fallingknife wrote:
           | In the USSR they ran Grapes of Wrath, which focuses on the
           | plight of the poor in America, in theaters as an attempt at
           | anti US propaganda. It backfired spectacularly because the
           | mostly poor audience mainly came out of it saying "in America
           | even poor people have cars!"
           | 
           | The Soviet bureaucrats who came up with the plan were of
           | course all from the upper class, and they cared so little for
           | the poor in their anti-capitalist command economy that they
           | didn't even realize how much poorer they were than the poor
           | people in the movie.
           | 
           | In capitalism we make food so cheap that even poor people can
           | get fat. If we put anti-capitalists like you in charge they
           | will starve.
        
             | digging wrote:
             | > In capitalism we make food so cheap that even poor people
             | can get fat
             | 
             | My dude, this is not a good thing.
        
               | fallingknife wrote:
               | For almost all of human history almost all humans spent
               | almost all of their income/labor on feeding themselves.
               | Not only is cheap food a good thing, it's one of the
               | best.
        
             | XTHK wrote:
             | Where is your data for these claims?
             | 
             | Here is something you mind find enlightening:
             | https://nintil.com/the-soviet-union-food/
        
             | thomastjeffery wrote:
             | > In capitalism we make food so cheap that even poor people
             | can get fat.
             | 
             | That's entirely my point. You can get fat, then get prices
             | out of the insulin you need to treat the diabetes you got
             | from getting fat on a high-energy low-nutrition diet.
             | 
             | It turns out that being in poverty is always harmful, so
             | why don't we just eliminate poverty? Because the USSR
             | "tried" and failed 60 years ago? That's not a good enough
             | reason. Like you said, it wasn't even an honest try to
             | begin with.
        
             | ilyt wrote:
             | Sure but I don't think current subsidy structure is all
             | that great.
             | 
             | It makes food cheap to _everything_. Not _every person_ ,
             | _everything_. Including corporations making  "bad" foods
             | 
             | It also subsidizes per area of crop, or volume of that crop
             | which means any "sustainable" practices get by percentage
             | less of them per kg.
             | 
             | I think it would be far better if the subsidies were just
             | directly to the people - drop food tax completely (maybe
             | aside "truly unhealthy food") and subsidize the poorest so
             | still everyone can eat, instead of subsidizing essentially
             | John Deeres and fertilizer manufacturers
        
         | fuzztester wrote:
         | Watch "Treating the Farm as an Ecosystem with Gabe Brown Part
         | 1, The 5 Tenets of Soil Health" on YouTube
         | 
         | https://youtu.be/uUmIdq0D6-A?feature=shared
        
       | benj111 wrote:
       | How normal is this?
       | 
       | I assume there are gluts fairly regularly so producers would to
       | some extent be used to this?
       | 
       | Further what does the future look like. Input costs going down,
       | or food price rises?
        
         | H8crilA wrote:
         | Completely normal? I don't see how you could expect anything
         | else in a competitive market for any commodity.
        
       | eecc wrote:
       | The way I understood it is that producers get paid a pittance
       | (thus they turn around to squeezing farmland workers even more)
       | by the distributors that act as a monopsony and impose ever lower
       | prices and production standards optimizing for process rather
       | than quality.
       | 
       | This is especially egregious in the Netherlands for example,
       | where you will regularly find moldy products shipped from across
       | the world (Chile, New Zealand) sold at a discount (down from eye
       | watering starting prices.)
        
         | lucumo wrote:
         | > monopsony
         | 
         | This really doesn't pass the smell test. There are multiple
         | very large supermarket chains here. They aren't monopsonies, by
         | the simple fact that there are multiple. They are also large
         | and very good at negotiating and optimising their supply
         | chains. If any of their suppliers were to have absurdly high
         | margins they would fuck them out of existence. Especially for
         | commodities like farm produce which you can get almost
         | anywhere.
         | 
         | The supermarkets make enormous profits, but it's nearly all due
         | to scale. Their margins on products are in the low single
         | digits. (In the Netherlands. The largest chain, Ahold Delhaize,
         | does make higher margins in the US.)
        
           | LightHugger wrote:
           | It's good to be careful with this logic, because it's now
           | common practice for one large holding group to own all of the
           | differently branded stores to create illusion of choice.
        
             | lucumo wrote:
             | That's a good point in general, but it is not true of the
             | largest Dutch supermarket chains.
             | 
             | The four largest chains (Albert Heijn, Jumbo, Aldi, Lidl)
             | are all independent of each other. A bunch of smaller
             | chains have bundled their buying power into Superunie,
             | which in turn is part of EMD. Superunie would end up
             | somewhere in the middle of the top 5 in the Dutch market.
             | EMD has about 10% of the European market. There's really no
             | monopsony here.
        
         | barrkel wrote:
         | Finding a lot of moldy "fresh" products on supermarket shelves
         | was one of the big changes I experienced moving from UK to
         | Switzerland. Food prices in Switzerland are generally 2x or 3x
         | EU prices, but the most aggravating thing was that quality was
         | lower than the UK (Coop/Migros vs Waitrose/Sainsburys).
        
           | birdstheword5 wrote:
           | I haven't noticed that myself but it's been 5 years since
           | I've been there (Zurich) - how recently did you move there
           | and which canton are you in?
           | 
           | I do agree that most UK shops (Waitrose/ Sainsbury's like you
           | mention) are really good compared with most stuff in
           | Switzerland
        
             | barrkel wrote:
             | Moved here two years ago. Spent three months in Zurich
             | (more local, smaller shops were worse) and now live in
             | Baden, Aargau.
        
       | londons_explore wrote:
       | In an efficient market, everything is sold at breakr even.
       | 
       | Produce is a competitive market, so there is no surprise that
       | it's a market that is efficient.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | sambazi wrote:
         | interesting take
         | 
         | so, is the reverse, huge margins indicate an inefficient
         | market, also true?
        
       | throwawaaarrgh wrote:
       | Food production should be strictly regulated and prices
       | protected. If food is treated like a generic commodity, the
       | capitalist incentives end up destroying flavor, nutrition,
       | variety, and the environment (read: your soil, your water,
       | anything that lives in or near soil or water). People will always
       | buy the cheapest possible thing, even if it's the worst thing for
       | them and everything around them. We shouldn't give people and
       | corporations the choice to slowly destroy everything. Not if we
       | want to survive long term.
        
       | GartzenDeHaes wrote:
       | Dole makes $1.2 billion a year EBITDA.
       | 
       | https://www.doleplc.com/investor-relations/news/ir-news-deta...
        
       | rightbyte wrote:
       | It is probably hard to compete with old investments that are
       | payed off already? Prices should rise as maintenance takes its
       | toll.
       | 
       | Fundamentally, farmers are valeuing their work way to low and our
       | work way to high. How many loc of C# do I need for a bottle of
       | milk?
       | 
       | The countryside need to squeeze us the city dwellers abit more.
       | The income disparity allows for it and the countryside need to be
       | able to flourish too.
        
         | delfinom wrote:
         | The big problem for farmers is they have to sell to
         | distributors/processors. Supermarkets don't want to deal with
         | 100 different farmers per produce item.
         | 
         | In the last few decades, those entities have merged into
         | megacorp regional and national monopolies. They are effectively
         | fucking the farmer and the consumer.
         | 
         | https://time.com/6171326/meat-beef-industry-congress/
         | 
         | >Over the past three decades, as the largest four beef-packing
         | firms have amassed control of 82% of the U.S. beef market
         | 
         | >Since 1980, an average of nearly 17,000 cattle ranchers have
         | gone out of business each year, the report said.
         | 
         | >Meanwhile, some of the biggest meat-processing companies--
         | Tyson, JBS, Marfrig, and Seaboard--have seen their gross
         | profits increase by more than 120% collectively since before
         | the pandemic, and their net income skyrocket 500%,
         | 
         | This also goes beyond the meat industry of course and extends
         | into everything farming.
        
         | mrpopo wrote:
         | High food prices make for angry voters, though.
        
           | magicalhippo wrote:
           | People here in Norway have complained about the price of food
           | for ages. Farmers likewise have complained a lot about their
           | low pay relative to workload.
           | 
           | Some years ago I met some french folks who had recently
           | landed a job here in Norway. They invited me for dinner which
           | we prepared together, and I noticed they had gone to one of
           | the food markets and gotten some quality ingredients. So we
           | ended up talking about the price of food.
           | 
           | They mentioned that when they moved here they were shocked at
           | how expensive food was. However, after a little while they
           | realized that they spent way less in terms of percentage of
           | their income on food compared to what they used to do in
           | France.
           | 
           | In France they had spent around 15% on food, and if they did
           | the same here then all of a sudden food here didn't seem more
           | expensive than in France.
           | 
           | In comparison, most Norwegians spend around 5% of their
           | income on food.
           | 
           | Farmers generally have the prices they get set by the
           | government. From what I can tell what has happened is that
           | we've gotten used to not spend a lot on food (relative to the
           | french say), the government hasn't given the farmers a lot,
           | meanwhile the "middle-men" has grown a lot and take a lot
           | more of the pie compared to before.
           | 
           | For example, a while ago the government reduced the VAT on
           | food from 25% to 12%, and while food prices in the shops
           | dropped right away, it didn't take long before they had crept
           | back up...
        
             | Martinussen wrote:
             | I believe the SSB (Statistics Norway) numbers are more like
             | ~10% for food and non-alcoholic drinks [1], it depends a
             | lot on what you look at. Culturally the Mediterraneans have
             | a very different relationship to food - but looking at
             | Eurostat, we're basically on the low end of average [2]?
             | 
             | (Also, the VAT reduction in light of the recent govt-
             | assembled expert panel arguing for the exact opposite as
             | one of the best ways of taxing high-income high-consumption
             | households without hurting lower income groups is... fun.)
             | 
             | --
             | 
             | [1] https://www.ssb.no/nasjonalregnskap-og-
             | konjunkturer/nasjonal...
             | 
             | [2] https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-
             | news/w/D...
        
               | rmah wrote:
               | This graph will make things a bit clearer...
               | https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/food-expenditure-vs-
               | gdp
        
               | magicalhippo wrote:
               | I used the numbers I recalled being quoted in the news at
               | the time, which also matched my own food expenses. I
               | assumed it was just food, while the SSB number includes
               | non-alcoholic drinks as you say, and we're quite fond of
               | sodas over here[1].
               | 
               | [1]: https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/countries-with-
               | the-highe...
        
               | gottorf wrote:
               | Romania is a clear outlier in that Eurostat source. I
               | wonder why that is?
        
             | FirmwareBurner wrote:
             | French farmers get a lot of subsidies form the state and
             | the EU, and start violent protests when their standards get
             | threatened.
        
           | Ekaros wrote:
           | High prices is acceptable reality. Unaffordable prices is
           | when you get the problems. And there is quite a bit
           | difference between those.
        
           | FirmwareBurner wrote:
           | Right. Then import more slave labor to keep costs down. /s
        
             | Paul_S wrote:
             | That is literally what we've been doing in the UK for
             | decades. It works!
        
               | FirmwareBurner wrote:
               | So has Germany and any other wealthy nation. Locals don't
               | want to work for poverty wages but there's a virtually
               | unlimited number of desperate people worldwide willing
               | to. That was my point.
        
         | boringg wrote:
         | It's the farming industry thats squeezing the farmer. The
         | hardware, seeds and fertilizer.
         | 
         | My feeling is that farmers are similar to employees they have
         | no collective power to control prices where the John Deere's
         | and Monsantos of the world push prices onto farmers. The buyers
         | of product have pricing power (similar to how wal-mart
         | squeeze's supplier with their buying power).
        
         | Dudester230602 wrote:
         | Let's redistribute the farm land equally first though. And stop
         | the farming subsidies.
        
         | dauertewigkeit wrote:
         | Cheap food prices are a very good thing. The farmers who are
         | struggling are the ones with unsustainable business models. The
         | answer for them is to join forces. Small time farming is a not
         | viable anymore and it benefits nobody to try to keep it going.
         | Most of these small timers are also way outdated in their
         | knowledge and methods.
        
           | jfk13 wrote:
           | This sounds uncomfortably like a call for more of the
           | consolidation and industrialisation of farming, in the name
           | of efficiency, that has been devastating to our environment.
        
             | JumpCrisscross wrote:
             | > _that has been devastating to our environment_
             | 
             | Nothing inherent to economies of scale is devastating our
             | environment. Companion planting, soil stewardship and water
             | management each _benefit_ from scale.
        
               | rikketikm wrote:
               | If they are applied, yes.
        
               | actionfromafar wrote:
               | True. It's just that so far in agriculture, economies of
               | scale have been let loose without much governing for
               | ecology.
        
               | JumpCrisscross wrote:
               | > _so far in agriculture, economies of scale have been
               | let loose without much governing for ecology_
               | 
               | Sure. But scale isn't the problem. (Focussing on its is
               | counterproductive. Amidst falling efficiency, no
               | population will choose long-term ecological impact over
               | short-term food availability.)
               | 
               | Solve the problem directly: incentivize land owners to
               | steward their land. Regulate where needed. Improve
               | agricultural education.
        
               | Timshel wrote:
               | Nothing is quite optimistic, issues such as are linked to
               | scale (Just 5min of some random though) :
               | 
               | - http://encyclopedia.uia.org/en/problem/destruction-
               | hedges-an...
               | 
               | - https://crops.extension.iastate.edu/encyclopedia/soil-
               | erosio...
               | 
               | - https://sentientmedia.org/how-does-agriculture-cause-
               | defores...
               | 
               | - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_impact_of_p
               | ig_fa...
               | 
               | - https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/feb/11/glo
               | bal-s...
               | 
               | Edit: and if you think not just on the ecological side.
               | The core benefice of scale is to produce more while
               | requiring less people. Which mean lower density of people
               | which has so many societal impacts ...
        
           | thriftwy wrote:
           | Yup, because we are dying to have more of these huge
           | latifundia bathing the world in pesticides and being so large
           | they can buy politicians by a dozen.
           | 
           | Are you writing from 1970?
        
           | lm28469 wrote:
           | > The farmers who are struggling are the ones with
           | unsustainable business models.
           | 
           | Or the ones who don't use pesticides that kill our planet
           | 
           | Or the ones which treat their animals decently
           | 
           | Or the small scale farms
           | 
           | Or ...
        
             | dauertewigkeit wrote:
             | There is less oversight when it comes to pesticide usage
             | within smaller operations. I grew up in that environment so
             | I can tell you from first hand experience that the
             | grandfatherly figure selling you pumpkins on the side of
             | the road is does not shy away from using pesticides, and
             | unlike the big operations he is not very precise with this
             | dosage either.
        
               | rightbyte wrote:
               | My grandfather used mercury as a pestiside on seeds. The
               | joke was that it made the hens abit cracy when they ate
               | spillovers on the court yard. So ye ...
        
             | JumpCrisscross wrote:
             | Small-scale farming is more resource intensive than farming
             | at scale. (Effects of pesticides are mixed.)
             | 
             | I like small-farm produce. But it's obviously a luxury. If
             | you're concerned about the environment, buying small-scale
             | organic produce is counterproductive.
        
               | lm28469 wrote:
               | Maybe what's unsustainable isn't their business model but
               | our way of life, that's all I'm saying, and so far
               | everything points that way
        
               | [deleted]
        
               | JumpCrisscross wrote:
               | > _what 's unsustainable isn't their business model but
               | our way of life_
               | 
               | What does that actually mean? (I can point to any
               | sociecoonomic problem and solve it by accusing someone's
               | way of life.)
        
           | trilbyglens wrote:
           | "joining forces" means selling out to a corporate farm, and
           | becoming a minimum wage laborer.
        
             | rightbyte wrote:
             | Farmer cooperatives for distribution are quite common.
             | 
             | But ye consolidation will make things worse for the
             | farmers.
             | 
             | I don't understand how anyone who not inherit a farm would
             | ever consider fighting the interest rate buying one. The
             | amount of work per dollar is insane compared to other
             | sectors.
        
           | pcl wrote:
           | Where do you think the line is between small scale and what
           | becomes sustainable? 10 acres? 100? 1000? Bigger?
        
           | noteflakes wrote:
           | > Cheap food prices are a very good thing.
           | 
           | If anything, food should be more expensive. Current prices do
           | not represent the cost of production, hence subsidies. The
           | consequences are nefarious: farmers spending their entire
           | career paying off debt, half of produce ending up in the
           | trash, underpayed immigrants working in agriculture, cheap
           | imports (subsidized by the origin country) putting pressure
           | on local producers...
           | 
           | Food is literally something we cannot live without. It should
           | be valued accordingly.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | Martinussen wrote:
             | Are subsidies _not_ inherently valuing something highly?
             | Except with some safeguards to prevent  "Well you're poor
             | so why are you worth keeping alive". Maybe it's better to
             | shift ag subsidies to things like food stamps/some form of
             | UBI, but that would definitively be a _pre_ requisite.
        
             | dauertewigkeit wrote:
             | If that is the economist's conclusion than I'd rather kick
             | the economist than take his advice.
        
             | NotSuspicious wrote:
             | Cheap food stabilizes the entire system. Expensive food is
             | how you get riots.
        
               | PH95VuimJjqBqy wrote:
               | I think you're spot on and it honestly amazes me how we
               | have so much evidence of this throughout history and yet
               | people can will still end up thinking about this purely
               | in terms of "the free market".
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | nly wrote:
       | Maybe food production shouldn't be highly profitable anyway,
       | seeing as food is a basic need?
        
         | sambazi wrote:
         | could be argued that most produce in a supermarket is not there
         | to satisfy 'basic needs'
        
         | abigail95 wrote:
         | At a glance if I look at a map, the areas with large and
         | profitable food companies tend to be more well fed.
         | 
         | I would dare to say that's causal. The more money you can make
         | selling food, the more people will do it.
        
       | greenie_beans wrote:
       | we should have a decentralized agriculture system based on local
       | farms and communities, then we wouldn't have this problem.
        
         | ryan93 wrote:
         | animals and agriculture span the entire country.
        
           | greenie_beans wrote:
           | *owned mostly by ~3 companies. if not owned, then controlled
           | via their non-competitive contracts they have with the very
           | small number of farmers who span the entire country.
        
           | krunck wrote:
           | "Agriculture" does not always equate to fruits and vegetables
           | for humans. Corn and soy for export is agriculture. So is
           | lettuce and tomatoes for local consumption. The point is we
           | need locally grown food for local consumption.
           | 
           | I live in a northern US state that is capable of growing
           | loads of produce in the summer, yet in the summer grocery
           | stores sell veggies and fruit grown in California, Mexico and
           | Florida. Stores sell garlic from China when we can grow great
           | garlic right here.
        
         | gumballindie wrote:
         | Yes, essentially, we need to get rid of corporate communism as
         | it destroyed every industry it touched. Farming is now
         | centralised and controled by a handful of corporate politburos,
         | software, media, everything else. So called capitalism is dead,
         | this is not capitalism we are experiencing. Otherwise you'd
         | have many small farms and businesses in general that freely
         | move capital and products around.
        
           | greenie_beans wrote:
           | yes, we should go to a decentralized system where the
           | community or workers own the farm.
        
             | gumballindie wrote:
             | Yes, we used to call them: "small business" or "family
             | owned business" or "family owned farm". A distant concept
             | these days. Sometimes these would have their interests
             | represented by the people they elect in local councils or
             | governments, as opposed to these forms of governance taking
             | orders directly from national central planning bureous,
             | known as boards, by means of lobbying.
        
               | cooper_ganglia wrote:
               | "Decentralized farming" is such an HN thing to say.
               | 
               | I get it and fully agree, but man, that got a good laugh
               | out of me, haha.
        
               | greenie_beans wrote:
               | i was trying to appeal to a certain audience with the
               | "decentralized" word. tech ppl love that word, especially
               | when describing any sort of enterprise system. know ur
               | audience!
        
           | ainiriand wrote:
           | In capitalism, capital de tend to concentrate.
        
             | gumballindie wrote:
             | At extreme ends capitalism manifests itself like communism:
             | oversight, concentration of power and capital in the hands
             | of few, and so on. Proper capitalism means that capital
             | flows freeley around all layers of society. In corporate
             | communism and communist socialism capital clogs. Doesn't
             | flow naturaly, it's slowed down, stored, accessible to and
             | managed by those few.
        
       | gatvol wrote:
       | From TA: "Those increases, the report says, were driven by costs
       | of fertiliser (up 60 per cent worldwide), construction (+48 per
       | cent), fuel and gas (+41 per cent), shipping rates (+40 per
       | cent), and electricity (+40 percent)." All of the drivers are
       | energy related - I'd hypothesise this is the result of climate
       | policies impacting energy costs.
        
       | juancb wrote:
       | Amidst the inefficiencies plaguing the fresh produce sector, the
       | astute capitalist sees ripe opportunity. By harnessing the
       | superior capabilities of AI and large language models, one can
       | exploit supply chain vulnerabilities and leverage arbitrage
       | opportunities.
        
       | gnicholas wrote:
       | Bananas are among the most popular fruit, as they are available
       | year-round and travel well. They are also often used as a loss-
       | leader. When I was at UCLA, the Whole Foods sold bananas at a
       | very low price (39C/ a pound?), as a loss leader. Since I was a
       | budget-conscious student, I would frequently just go in to buy
       | bananas (it was 2 blocks from my apt, and on my walk home). But
       | most shoppers who brave LA traffic to go to the grocery store
       | would buy many other items, making the whole trip profitable for
       | the store.
        
         | jzwinck wrote:
         | Bananas also serve another important function which ensures
         | their continued success as an export product:
         | https://www.europol.europa.eu/media-press/newsroom/news/65-t...
        
       | pers0n wrote:
       | Also keep in mind that they destroy crops before they ever go to
       | market, if they produce too much. This is how capitalism works,
       | you have to waste resources to keep the prices stable.
        
       | miguelazo wrote:
       | I wonder if this is what helped kill AppHarvest.
       | 
       | There are a lot of middlemen in produce, especially when it is
       | produced abroad. I don't think they're the ones hurting, and are
       | a big part of the problem.
        
       | voisin wrote:
       | In British Columbia, Canada, there is a system called Loop
       | Resources (https://loopresource.ca/) whereby grocers and farmers
       | can connect and expired food can be set aside and picked up by
       | farmers to feed to their animals.
       | 
       | The one farmer I know who participates collects a pickup truck
       | full 3x per week, and he is only one of several farmers
       | collecting from that grocer.
        
       | scythe wrote:
       | Commenters seem to be analyzing this as though it were a steady-
       | state phenomenon. But it isn't. The article clearly states that
       | this is a result of increased costs along the supply chain that
       | appeared due to disruption during the COVID pandemic.
        
       | aszantu wrote:
       | Everybody should have a pig, or maybe 2-3 houses should share a
       | pig for food waste, just so it doesn't get wasted and everyone
       | gets good protein by the end of the year. Been thinking about
       | this for a while, don't know how to promote this idea more
        
         | chinchilla2020 wrote:
         | micro-farming is actually more environmentally destructive and
         | wasteful than factory farming. It's a lot harder to regulate
         | and control 10000 peasant farms than 1 large factory farm that
         | has proper processes in place.
        
         | JumpCrisscross wrote:
         | > _Everybody should have a pig_
         | 
         | You're describing peasants. Playing peasant doesn't work at
         | scale. Imagine the environmental impact and economic
         | destruction giving everyone in Tokyo and New York farm animals
         | would entail.
         | 
         | > _maybe 2-3 houses should share a pig_
         | 
         | But sometimes some people don't want to eat pork. No worries,
         | we have the law of large numbers. A thousand people can share a
         | pool of pigs.
         | 
         | Someone is vegetarian? What if those who want to participate
         | share a pig?
         | 
         | Some people are tired of pork? People are moving in and out?
         | What if we have a pool of pigs that are slaughtered from time
         | to time, and you can take what you want when you want it?
         | 
         | Oh right. That's a store. We circled back to a butcher.
         | 
         | If you care about this, 4-H has a program where kids raise a
         | farm animal to sell at auction.
         | 
         | > _just so it doesn 't get wasted_
         | 
         | Hunters I know are close to zero waste. Farmers? No clear link
         | between raising a chicken and _e.g._ eating its gizzard.
        
           | gigel82 wrote:
           | I think the point they were making was that pigs eat food
           | scraps of all kinds, and produce organic fertilizer (in
           | addition to meat). It's an interesting idea, but it
           | definitely doesn't work in the cities and I bet most folks in
           | the suburbs wouldn't tolerate the smell either.
           | 
           | But maybe if we force supermarkets to give out expired food
           | to coop farmers for animal feed instead of just throwing it
           | out in the dumpster, we could be on to something.
        
             | JumpCrisscross wrote:
             | > _if we force supermarkets to give out expired food to
             | coop farmers for animal feed instead of just throwing it
             | out in the dumpster_
             | 
             | Getting fresh produce from farms to shoppers involves
             | enough waste. You need to transform the waste into
             | something non-perishable, so transport can be done lazily.
             | Composting, perhaps?
        
         | rs_rs_rs_rs_rs wrote:
         | You should have the pig first for couple of months until you
         | promote it.
        
       | dauertewigkeit wrote:
       | Once you see the amount of food waste you start feeling cheated.
       | Like, you pay top dollar for some greens and then you see tons of
       | the same exact greens being dumped in a dumpster at the end of
       | the day. The food itself is not worth the price you are paying
       | for it. It's the service and the logistics that you are paying
       | for. If everybody paid the dumpster price the supermarket would
       | fail. It would be cool if there were business models where this
       | was made more explicit.
        
         | Projectiboga wrote:
         | Here in Manhattan, NYC, we have tiers of produce. I can pay $5
         | for strawberries that could last for some days. Or I can go to
         | one of the fruit stands which has better than average
         | strawberries for $1 and eat half that evening and most of the
         | rest for breakfast and lunch. I might not get 100% good ones
         | but the value is there. I've seen places w tired but very cheep
         | produce out in Brooklyn. I've read about a cohort here called
         | 'freegans' who stake out places at the time the expired
         | prepared stuff is put out on the street, that isn't scalable
         | but a few w mental disabilities, addictions or just starving
         | nonconformists do it.
        
           | diebeforei485 wrote:
           | NYC is a bit of a special case. Regulation makes it hard to
           | operate a larger supermarket, regulation generally makes it
           | so all produce coming into NYC has to spend time coming
           | through Hunts Point.
           | 
           | Go to any supermarket across the river in New Jersey and
           | you'll have vastly higher quality produce.
        
         | JumpCrisscross wrote:
         | > _food itself is not worth the price you are paying for
         | it...the service and the logistics that you are paying for_
         | 
         | It's the mass production and constant availability. (Also
         | logistics.) Subsistence farming works great until a drought.
         | 
         | Put another way, the waste lets the fresh produce be cheap.
         | (That doesn't mean we can't do something better with it than
         | drop it in a dumpster.)
         | 
         | > _If everybody paid the dumpster price the supermarket would
         | fail. It would be cool if there were business models where this
         | was made more explicit._
         | 
         | If everyone paid the dumpster price, there wouldn't be any food
         | in the dumpster.
        
           | datadrivenangel wrote:
           | Exactly. There is an optimal amount of spoilage to maximize
           | the amount of actually consumed produce and minimize the
           | cost.
        
           | rthomas6 wrote:
           | > Subsistence farming works great until a drought.
           | 
           | Maybe we should do this by default and fall back onto the
           | global supply chain when there is a drought.
        
           | armchairhacker wrote:
           | It's still not an excuse to throw the food away. Some
           | supermarkets donate all of their excess food to pantries.
           | Supermarkets have trouble paying their employees a decent
           | wage, why can't they let employees take X amount of leftover
           | items?
           | 
           | Some people don't get enough food, many more do but would
           | rather spend less and not be picky. They would be happy to
           | take the remaining leftovers before they spoil, especially
           | food like produce (whereas junk food, fortunately in this
           | case, tends to last much longer so it doesn't get wasted).
           | 
           | A lot of places actually do this, which shows that it's a
           | real solution; I don't really see why all can't.
        
         | coding123 wrote:
         | It's the same with software - the electronics in use when we
         | create a Jira ticket, or all of the electrons in use for all
         | the Jira activity for an entire year of you building your
         | product probably costs $0.15. Maybe storage and history and
         | uptime - but Jira (cloud) that cost is shared.
         | 
         | What you're really paying for is the ongoing development of
         | Jira.
         | 
         | (Not looking for hate on Jira - just an example).
        
         | turing_complete wrote:
         | That doesn't make sense. Of course you're paying for the
         | logistics and service to get the food. Otherwise you would not
         | get the food. The food wouldn't even exist.
        
           | ygjb wrote:
           | That's the point. As consumers we pay the cost of logistics
           | and service, but we also pay for the waste. We aren't paying
           | the cost of a head of lettuce, we are paying the cost of a
           | head of lettuce, plus a fractional cost of waste produce.
           | From an economic perspective we are paying for the risk the
           | retailer takes in bringing a product with a short shelf life
           | to market.
           | 
           | Grocers offset some of this risk by processing some of the
           | food onsite, selling precooked meals, premade salads, etc.
           | 
           | If it was more profitable to further reduce costs, then they
           | would, but there are diminishing returns on end of the line
           | food processing, since the kitchens and packaging required
           | are generalized for a broad range of foods instead of being a
           | specialized operation that is more efficient.
           | 
           | It sucks, but it's the system that capital built, and pretty
           | much the only thing we can do if we don't like it is to focus
           | on buying local, or electing politicians who will target food
           | waste as a policy.
        
             | sokoloff wrote:
             | I think it's the system that biology built.
             | 
             | Fresh food spoils. Always has. Happens less now with
             | readily available refrigeration, salt, and fast long-
             | distance logistics. Those supply chain improvements make it
             | more feasible to produce a lot of it and have a wide
             | variety available almost without regard to season.
             | 
             | Ever since people farmed, they put in all the labor and got
             | out only the portion of product that they could use without
             | spoiling. That's how we got canning, bread, cheese,
             | beer/wine, and other means to preserve the caloric content
             | of agricultural products.
        
               | Eisenstein wrote:
               | But there is no biological reason people in the north
               | eastern United States should be able eat fresh oranges
               | and pineapples in December. That is not natural. It is
               | because of financial incentives that it is possible, and
               | it also creates a lot of waste as a byproduct.
        
               | ch4s3 wrote:
               | This is an appeal to nature which is a logical fallacy.
               | You PERCEIVE something as natural and therefore reason
               | that the inverse is immoral. But there's nothing logical
               | about this, and even the moral reasoning is highly
               | suspect.
        
               | Eisenstein wrote:
               | I don't think you understand what I am saying. I am
               | responding to the use of the word 'biology' in the parent
               | post.
        
               | Goronmon wrote:
               | _But there is no biological reason people in the north
               | eastern United States should be able eat fresh oranges
               | and pineapples in December._
               | 
               | If the goal is to be pedantic, then technically the
               | "biological reason" is that nature gave humans the
               | ability to alter their environment in ways that allows
               | the north eastern United States to eat fresh oranges and
               | pineapples in December.
        
               | Eisenstein wrote:
               | If you go down the road of 'ultimate cause and effect'
               | and 'what is a thing really' then you end up debating
               | whether hot dogs are sandwiches.
        
               | tomjakubowski wrote:
               | Yes there's a biological reason that should be true. Just
               | as there is a biological reason people migrated to live
               | in places like where pineapples grow and the northeastern
               | United States.
        
               | tick_tock_tick wrote:
               | But those same financial incentives are why people aren't
               | staving all over the place. Every attempt to move too far
               | from capitalism just results in mass starvation.
        
               | sokoloff wrote:
               | There's no thermodynamic reason that my house (in the
               | north east US) should be 68degF/20degC in December
               | either. It's not natural, is because of financial
               | incentives that it's possible, and creates a lot of waste
               | as a by-product.
        
               | Eisenstein wrote:
               | Yes, that is my point.
        
               | sokoloff wrote:
               | Do only people in capitalist economic systems have heat
               | in their homes in the winter? If so, is that _really_ a
               | scathing indictment of capitalism?
        
               | Eisenstein wrote:
               | Who is indicting capitalism? Does pointing out cause and
               | effect make an attack?
        
           | Spivak wrote:
           | I think the idea is that the cost of the goods themselves is
           | pointless and we're effectively rationing in a world where
           | there's no need for it. I would much rather pay directly for
           | the logistics in exchange for "take however much you want"
           | and see if we can drive the waste to 0.
           | 
           | If you're just gonna throw em out I'll take a whole sack of
           | potatoes and put them to use.
        
         | mcpackieh wrote:
         | > _Like, you pay top dollar for some greens_
         | 
         | When people say things like this, or about how expensive it is
         | to eat healthy, I feel like I'm in a twilight zone episode
         | where the grocery stores I walk into exist in an alternate
         | universe from their own.
         | 
         | Buying produce is the cheapest way you can eat, it's the
         | cheapest food in the grocery store. Cheaper than anything in
         | the frozen / processed foods aisles. Fresh produce is one of
         | the cheapest things you can possibly buy period. For the price
         | of one bag of chips you can buy enough potatoes to feed you for
         | a week.
        
         | c22 wrote:
         | At a Fedex copy center it costs over $2 a page to send a fax
         | but only 20 cents a page to make a copy. Same machine, same
         | amount of time spent monopolizing said machine, but at the end
         | of the photocopying you walk away with a physical piece of
         | paper they will have to restock -\\_(tsu)_/-
        
           | hammock wrote:
           | The fax machine prints out a confirmation page, though
           | doesn't it?
        
             | c22 wrote:
             | You can send the confirmation to email.
        
           | wincy wrote:
           | Hah yes I needed to send a fax to the government for my
           | disabled daughter's medical benefits and it would have been
           | $70 at UPS. I couldn't believe it. I sent it certified mail
           | for $6 instead.
        
             | c22 wrote:
             | Turns out the library here will send faxes for free.
        
             | toomuchtodo wrote:
             | Consider https://www.phaxio.com/ for future fax needs. Like
             | Twilio for faxes. No association besides using it when a
             | fax is required for a use case.
             | 
             | A few cents per page and can use curl:
             | https://www.phaxio.com/features/
        
             | popcalc wrote:
             | voip.ms is great if you need virtual fax.
        
         | Ekaros wrote:
         | You are paying also for that wasted food. Availability is a
         | part of the price. The excess to be there so you can buy the
         | quantity you need.
        
         | HPsquared wrote:
         | The food isn't worth as much at the end of the day I guess...
         | limited shelf life. There's always frozen / processed food I
         | guess!
        
           | JumpCrisscross wrote:
           | > _frozen / processed food_
           | 
           | Fresh produce was historically a delicacy. Most agrarian
           | diets consisted of preserved food. The modern phenomenon of
           | year-round fresh produce is a luxury. (Albeit a welcome one.)
        
             | ip26 wrote:
             | By this angle, clean water, indoor plumbing, vaccines and
             | hospitals are also a luxury.
        
               | [deleted]
        
               | lbotos wrote:
               | Uh, they are? Clearly, you are taking them for granted,
               | but these things _are_ absolutely a luxury.
               | 
               | There is a website that I cannot remember off-hand that
               | shows you if you make more than like $5 a day you are in
               | some top echelon.
               | 
               | There is another that shows you what different material
               | objects (plates, toothbrushes etc) look like across the
               | world at different income levels. If anyone knows do
               | share.
        
               | Hackbraten wrote:
               | > There is another that shows you what different material
               | objects (plates, toothbrushes etc) look like across the
               | world at different income levels.
               | 
               | Could that be Dollar Street? [1]
               | 
               | [1]: https://www.gapminder.org/dollar-street
        
             | HPsquared wrote:
             | Meat every day as well... We do have it pretty good.
        
         | worldsayshi wrote:
         | Economy issues aside. I'm more concerned about the ecology of
         | it. What happens to the dumpster food? Before agriculture food
         | that wasn't used just ended up on the forest floor and got
         | reused. I wonder what happens to all the food waste in terms of
         | numbers. I guess most of it either gets burnt or rot away on a
         | dump site?
        
           | brutusborn wrote:
           | Straight to landfill where it decomposes to methane. If
           | you're lucky your landfill has a fancy new methane harvesting
           | system; if not, straight to atmosphere.
        
             | mistrial9 wrote:
             | > If you're lucky your landfill
             | 
             | luck has nothing to do with it at all.. There are many
             | kinds of landfills and many jurisdictions. Every person in
             | every part of the world reading these words has services
             | related to that. Methane release, and the economics of the
             | waste services, deserve, no _demand_ , intelligent insight
             | right now, despite low-economic incentives.
        
             | smileysteve wrote:
             | And in either case, the water and acid content combines
             | with other waste to create leachate that eats the plastic
             | barrier, so that the toxic waste then ruins the aquifer.
        
             | actionfromafar wrote:
             | Plus all fossil fertiliser used to produce the food.
        
         | elzbardico wrote:
         | We have made a trade-off here. In exchange for the scale gains
         | of living in big cities we have to accept the fact that food
         | distribution is going to always have some degree of waste and
         | the logistic costs themselves are going to be dominant.
        
         | jameshart wrote:
         | You're paying for the logistics and service that ensures that
         | at least as much of that food as people might want to buy, is
         | available at the time they want to buy it.
         | 
         | You paid for the food you bought, plus the convenience of it
         | being there when you wanted it.
         | 
         | Which means you also paid for the cost of the stuff that was
         | left on the shelf at the end of the day too.
         | 
         | If you want to be able to walk into a supermarket at closing
         | time and still have a choice of things to buy, then you want
         | supermarkets to have waste.
        
         | sidewndr46 wrote:
         | Most things are not worth what you pay for it. That is the
         | definition of profit. If something is sold exactly at the cost
         | to make it, there would be no profit. If you realized how high
         | profits are on things like cars and cell phones, you'd have the
         | same opinion of those
        
           | datavirtue wrote:
           | Last I heard it cost ~$5000 to make a Toyota Camry.
        
         | hammock wrote:
         | >Once you see the amount of food waste you start feeling
         | cheated. Like, you pay top dollar for some greens and then you
         | see tons of the same exact greens being dumped in a dumpster at
         | the end of the day. The food itself is not worth the price you
         | are paying for it. It's the service and the logistics that you
         | are paying for.
         | 
         | That's true. It's also true that growing your own greens at
         | home could probably cost even more, all things considered.
         | Weird paradox.
        
           | toomuchtodo wrote:
           | Access to healthy greens is a utility, like water: not much
           | profit but scale is important.
        
         | brightball wrote:
         | I've always wanted to see a grocery store where the prices
         | decrease the closer the item is to its expiration date.
        
           | hoorayimhelping wrote:
           | If you've ever seen fruit on sale, you've seen a coarse
           | version of this.
        
           | mc32 wrote:
           | There are specialty outlets -so called salvage grocery- that
           | do just this -usually in cheap strip malls as otherwise the
           | RE would be too expensive to be viable. They sell items close
           | to their expiry and they are at a significant discount.
           | 
           | Many people don't know about them because they are not their
           | target market.
        
           | specialp wrote:
           | The problem is that your profits are made on the fresher
           | items. The marked down items are being sold at cost or at a
           | loss. That conditions customers to shop for marked down items
           | and cannibalizes the fresh sales. I myself used to buy the
           | "Manager Meat Special" leg of lamb when it came up. But the
           | stores near me stopped doing it. They find it more profitable
           | to dispose of it at a 100% loss than discount.
        
             | barrysteve wrote:
             | Raise prices on fresh food and let the near-expired food go
             | at regular prices?
        
           | Larrikin wrote:
           | Japanese grocery stores do this with meat and packaged meals.
           | It's not always the best strategy as nearly all the good
           | stuff is gone by the time they start discounting and you will
           | consistently be getting food well after a reasonable dinner
           | time.
        
           | hammock wrote:
           | These exist. Or grocery stores have outlets ("day-old" etc)
           | where you can buy the near-expiry or expired goods.
        
           | JackFr wrote:
           | A place I used to go to had a 'Meat priced for quick sale'
           | bin. Kind of a crap shoot, but I've got a bit of an iron gut
           | and the steaks were like 2/3 off.
        
             | vel0city wrote:
             | In college the grocer near me had NY strip steaks for like
             | $2/lb one day. Tons of it. I thought I hit the jackpot, and
             | decided to throw a big grill out party with a lot of
             | friends. I probably had a dozen people waiting for some
             | awesome steaks. They were all absolutely terrible, some of
             | the worst cuts of meat I think I ever had. Quite a
             | disaster. Fun times though.
        
               | mcpackieh wrote:
               | In university my roommate found an unthinkable deal on
               | craigslist; a beer distributor was giving away a pallet
               | of beer for free for anybody that would come and get it.
               | We obviously got it and threw a party, but the beer was
               | so awful nobody could drink enough of it to even get
               | drunk.
        
               | mhink wrote:
               | I had something very similar happen back when I was in
               | college- I stopped off at a convenience store and they
               | were selling a particular beer (by Shiner) at $2 per six-
               | pack. I only bought one and opened it later that evening,
               | only to find out it was priced so cheap because it had
               | this awful "smoked" flavor. I couldn't get through the
               | second _sip_. Bleh.
        
             | pcl wrote:
             | This is common in grocery stores in Oslo. It's a great
             | place to go when you're ready for some serendipitous dinner
             | planning.
        
           | ericpauley wrote:
           | My local grocery store (Some Kroger-brand) does this with a
           | variety of products, but only by discounting one time. I
           | imagine they do something similar nationwide. Products are
           | very close to, but of course still before, their sell-by
           | date.
        
           | c22 wrote:
           | The grocer I frequent has bright orange 'manager special'
           | discount stickers that go on things nearing their expiry.
        
           | jameshart wrote:
           | Is 'reduced to clear' not a thing where you live?
        
           | vel0city wrote:
           | Several of the grocery stores I frequent absolutely do this
           | with a lot of things. They'll usually have something like a
           | clearance section with things on their last few days. Its
           | usually a good place to find a cheap loaf of bread or some
           | kind of desert that's about to go past its sell by date to
           | eat that night. The tricky part is those sections usually
           | aren't refrigerated so its only shelf-stable stuff.
           | 
           | But they do often have "sales" for fresh goods even as good
           | as buy one get two free which if you look at the goods on
           | "sale" its sell by dates are all within a day or two. But
           | hey, buy a big thing of berries and invite some friends over.
        
           | mcpackieh wrote:
           | In the US there are some discount grocery stores (also called
           | 'outlet' or 'salvage' grocery stores) that sell product other
           | grocery stores took off the shelves for being too close to
           | expired. Sometimes the food is expired, but still perfectly
           | edible because those "best by" dates are very conservative.
        
         | ghostDancer wrote:
         | You forget the middlemen and I don't mean the trucker, I mean
         | the one that gets all the markup paying low to the producer and
         | selling high to the shopkeeper.
        
       | jimnotgym wrote:
       | >'Less than half' fresh produce sold globally makes any profit
       | 
       | None at all, or none for the producer?
        
       | ravenstine wrote:
       | If we want to reduce produce waste, then we should be buying more
       | of our produce frozen rather than fresh.
        
         | cosinetau wrote:
         | Yes. Let's burn fossil fuels to make sure we don't waste
         | anything.
        
           | Tokkemon wrote:
           | Freezing food takes a fraction of the energy it costs to ship
           | fresh foods before they rot.
        
             | throwawaaarrgh wrote:
             | Sorry but nobody in these comments understands the food
             | value chain. Most foods require very specific temperatures
             | and handling. Even if you transport them right, the actual
             | storage and routing of food varies widely. There is often
             | no location to store food properly intermediately, so
             | diesel trucks are kept idling to keep the food in a place
             | with the right environment. But it varies greatly depending
             | on where it's being sold and what their logistics chain is,
             | _in addition_ to what market they 're serving and thus
             | where they're sourcing their food and how they're picking
             | it.
             | 
             | HN sure does love to oversimplify...
        
           | deelowe wrote:
           | I'm fairly certain shipping and warehousing frozen food in
           | bulk would be more efficient than shipping containers with
           | fresh produce going to each and every grocery store several
           | days a week.
        
       | haroldship wrote:
       | This seems like the experience of Jeremy Clarkson in Clarkson's
       | Farm. Many things against being a successful farmer resulting in
       | practically zero profit.
        
         | JackFr wrote:
         | But in the US at least your land is taxed at an agricultural
         | rate rather than single family residential rate. There can be
         | an enormous financial benefit to being a 'farmer'. Even if you
         | ostensibly lose money at it.
        
       | hcfman wrote:
       | Well, if the food is actually being eaten, then that's actually a
       | win situation for people eating fresh food and hence overall
       | "good" from a benefit to the people perspective.
       | 
       | So long as this situation continues, which is where the problem
       | is I expect. Boots on the ground people should be able to grow
       | and create savings as well.
        
       | klondike_klive wrote:
       | Relevant: British farmer Guy Singh-Watson is urging the big 6
       | supermarket chains to Get Fair about Farming.
       | https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/farmers-supe...
        
       | amitprayal wrote:
       | Thankfully this does not apply for India
        
         | JumpCrisscross wrote:
         | > _this does not apply for India_
         | 
         | India has a horribly inefficient agricultural sector [1]. It's
         | run as a jobs program for surplus unskilled labor. Its cost is
         | in land and water waste, together with excess emissions and
         | diet-related premature deaths.
         | 
         | [1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-020-00157-w
        
           | amitprayal wrote:
           | Having been in US for a while and having coming back now I
           | can definitely confirm that quality of fresh produce in US
           | very bad compared to India, If you have only grown up on a
           | meat based and processed foods diet you may not be able to
           | relate. We generally consume a lot of fresh produce as
           | compared to the western world, don't always believe in biased
           | articles.
        
             | JumpCrisscross wrote:
             | > _quality of fresh produce in US very bad compared to
             | India_
             | 
             | I agree. (Though you can access similar quality at American
             | farmers' markets and upscale grocers in rich communities.)
             | I never remarked on quality. Just efficiency.
             | 
             | Indian agriculture is small scale, labour wasteful, land
             | and water inefficient and carbon intensive. Relative to
             | median income, produce is high cost, which causes a lot of
             | the population to over-rely on processed cereals.
             | 
             | High-income Americans and Indians consume a lot of good,
             | fresh produce. (I've seen fresh Indian mangoes in New York,
             | flown in overnight, though I'm doubtful they had their
             | paperwork in order. That obviously isn't scalable.) The
             | absolute threshold is lower in India. But relatively
             | speaking it's higher.
             | 
             | > _We generally consume a lot of fresh produce as compared
             | to the western world_
             | 
             | At a high relative income level, yes. (Lower in cities,
             | because logistics.) There are good reasons Indian life
             | expectancy is 15% lower than America's at birth, 2 to 5%
             | lower at 30 (males, reverse death probability) and then 20%
             | lower again at 40 again.
        
             | pcthrowaway wrote:
             | Perhaps produce in the U.S. is generally more homogenous in
             | the name of efficiency, and as a result, lower quality.
        
             | sss111 wrote:
             | +1 fully agree, as someone who has to travel often between
             | the two countries.
        
       | mihaic wrote:
       | Farmers seem underrepresented in general economic planning,
       | except when handing out subsidies to keep their votes.
       | 
       | I've for instance thought that UBI would be unavoidable in a few
       | decades, but how would we keep farmers to grow food? The only
       | answer I have is that their income has to be at leat 3-5x that of
       | the UBI.
        
         | JumpCrisscross wrote:
         | > _Farmers seem underrepresented in general economic planning_
         | 
         | Wat. The USDA is a $181 to 500bn agency [1][2]. Every state has
         | an agricultural agency. Alongside defence, another must-pass
         | recurring bill is the farm bill [3][4].
         | 
         | > _except when handing out subsidies to keep their votes_
         | 
         | This is democracy. If you're getting subsidies to buy your
         | votes, you are by definition well represented.
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2024-usda...
         | _page 1_
         | 
         | [4] https://www.usaspending.gov/agency/department-of-
         | agriculture...
         | 
         | [3] https://www.fs.usda.gov/managing-land/farm-bill
         | 
         | [4] https://www.farmaid.org/issues/farm-policy/whats-going-on-
         | wi...
        
           | Iulioh wrote:
           | And to add, 33% of the European budget is farn subsidies (and
           | that's one big reason why ukraine is unlikely to enter the
           | EU)
        
           | mihaic wrote:
           | I wasn't denying that a lot of money is being spent, it's how
           | it's spent.
           | 
           | What I meant was that subsidies for producing various
           | crops/animal products dwarf all the other spending on rural
           | programs, and not a lot of effort is put into actually
           | figuring out how to improve those communities, many of which
           | are bleeding young people.
           | 
           | There is no plan to maintain agricultural communities, and
           | what's worse, that doesn't seem to be a desire for such a
           | plan.
        
             | JumpCrisscross wrote:
             | > _not a lot of effort is put into actually figuring out
             | how to improve those communities_
             | 
             | Fair enough. We focus on farmers' production, not their
             | communities. If the farmers don't care about their
             | communities, they deteriorate. Maybe we're betting on
             | automation.
        
         | deltarholamda wrote:
         | The people in the concentrated urban areas call farming areas
         | "fly-over country," and love to point out that the urban areas
         | contribute 70% to the national GDP. In the past 10-20 years
         | they started making noises about eliminating the Electoral
         | College system.
         | 
         | The fact that farmers have a say in anything is astonishing,
         | and people are hard at work trying to prevent them from having
         | any voice at all on a national stage.
         | 
         | I find it all very short-sighted, but that's politics for you.
        
       | cushpush wrote:
       | How can we make food free for all and also delicious
        
       | glitchc wrote:
       | A fresh batch of basil at the grocery store is essentially a
       | luxury item, exclusive to those who can afford it. What doesn't
       | sell is waste. Perhaps it's time to consider community kitchens
       | residing alongside grocery stores. This would be a place where a
       | meal is always available, all hours of the day, for free, to
       | anyone who walks in. These kitchens can consume food waste while
       | providing a useful benefit to the population.
       | 
       | It's surprising we don't have this already in North America given
       | how much surplus food is produced.
        
         | lusus_naturae wrote:
         | Be the change you want in the world. Start your own community
         | kitchen :)
        
         | MSFT_Edging wrote:
         | > It's surprising we don't have this already in North America
         | given how much surplus food is produced.
         | 
         | You're describing a social function without a lucrative profit
         | motive.
         | 
         | One man's desire to improve their community is another's worst
         | nightmare.
        
         | RileyJames wrote:
         | I went to exactly this a few weeks ago in Ocean Grove, Vic,
         | Australia.
         | 
         | A cafe and 'market' that was entirely sustained by 'expired'
         | goods from the local super markets that was otherwise destined
         | for the garbage bin. Trucks kept rolling in as we are.
         | 
         | The cafe was only open weekend (volunteers) but the market was
         | open everyday.
         | 
         | It was a 'pay what ever you can system', and $0 was fine. There
         | was a 2 bag maximum on goods you could take away from the
         | market.
         | 
         | And any payment made was a tax deductible donation.
         | 
         | The market had an obviously limited selection of goods,
         | dependent on what came from the supermarkets.
         | 
         | But when I was there,
         | 
         | - unlimited breads of all kinds (like shelves and shelves and
         | shelves, including very nice sourdoughs)
         | 
         | - capsicums (green)
         | 
         | - milk
         | 
         | - yogurt
         | 
         | - lettuce
         | 
         | - carrots
         | 
         | - few other misc veg
         | 
         | - a lot of soy and protein powders
         | 
         | - juices
         | 
         | - and frozen goods, which I didn't explore.
         | 
         | You couldn't survive off it alone (unless you had to). But it
         | was a cool option to have. Love the concept.
        
           | Kalium wrote:
           | The market approach is different from the soup kitchen model.
           | The opportunity to pay, the ability to make your own choices
           | in produce, and the experience of using something like a
           | grocery store are things that help people feel dignified.
           | That sense of human dignity can matter a great deal,
           | especially to those clinging to it by their fingernails.
        
         | bannedbybros wrote:
         | [dead]
        
         | CoffeeOnWrite wrote:
         | Love this idea.
         | 
         | To add food for thought, could the basil be dried in a
         | dehydrator immediately after being taken off the shelves after
         | minor wilting but while the taste and nutrition are still
         | there? The resulting product might be better quality than what
         | is sold in the dried spices aisle that is much less fresh..
        
           | User23 wrote:
           | Better yet is a freeze dryer if you can afford one.
        
             | AussieWog93 wrote:
             | I vacuum seal and freeze my basil. (You can get away
             | without the vaccuum sealing, but it'll get freezer burn
             | after a few months).
             | 
             | Honestly indistinguishable from fresh basil once you cook
             | it, and I say this as an Italian food snob.
        
         | onlyrealcuzzo wrote:
         | Labor is much more expensive than food waste in the US.
         | 
         | So this only works at a very high cost or donated labor (which
         | probably won't scale).
        
           | diogenes4 wrote:
           | What I'm taking with is that the US isn't responsible enough
           | to distribute its own food.
        
           | addaon wrote:
           | It sounds like the third missing component, on the other side
           | of the cafeteria from the grocery store, is a culinary
           | school. Give (low-paid) students an opportunity to hone their
           | skills, face daily challenges (what ingredients are available
           | today?), and give back to the community.
        
           | mc32 wrote:
           | Isn't this the idea behind soup kitchens?
           | 
           | They're not next to expensive grocery stores real estate but
           | they do receive donated food and labor.
        
           | hotnfresh wrote:
           | Food waste is a super-weird thing for people to worry about,
           | IMO, because it's directly related to food being very cheap
           | relative to labor. As you point out, the labor-cost of saving
           | this food really doesn't make sense.
           | 
           | You fix it by making food expensive. I doubt anyone's too
           | keen to do that.
        
             | Jill_the_Pill wrote:
             | It's a climate and biodiversity concern: overproduction
             | wastes farmland that could be, or used to be, wild. The
             | energy put into food transport and storage was used for
             | nothing. Wasted produce rots, giving off methane, and
             | wasted meat or dairy represents double waste, as the
             | animals were raised on crops.
             | 
             | https://www.usda.gov/media/blog/2022/01/24/food-waste-and-
             | it...
             | 
             | You fix it by making people aware and asking them to act
             | responsibly.
        
               | hotnfresh wrote:
               | The "acting responsibly" part costs money in labor, if
               | you apply it to the parts of the supply chain that really
               | matter. This is just another way of arriving at "raise
               | food prices".
        
               | Jill_the_Pill wrote:
               | How does "don't buy more than you know you can use" and
               | "don't produce more than you know you can sell" cost more
               | labor?
        
               | hotnfresh wrote:
               | It has to have _some_ cost or we'd already do it. Right?
               | 
               | Recovering waste in production and transportation is
               | labor costs. If it were cost-effective, they'd already do
               | it. Recovering waste at the grocery stores costs labor
               | and/or loss of sales in excess of the cost of the risk of
               | waste. Same at restaurants. Again, if it wouldn't cost
               | them more to avoid that waste, they already would.
               | 
               | Admittedly, at home, it's mostly a time cost, but good
               | luck convincing people to spend even a couple more hours
               | a week in the kitchen and meal planning and pantry
               | organizing to save small amounts of money (and _really_
               | cutting home food waste takes a lot more than a couple
               | hours a week)
        
             | jeffbee wrote:
             | > I doubt anyone's too keen to do that.
             | 
             | Unfortunately you'll find this goal is extremely widespread
             | among American academics who call themselves "socialists",
             | who grew up on trust funds, went to Little Ivy colleges,
             | and who supplement their inheritances with careers as
             | magazine editors, and who have zero personal experience
             | with either food production or poverty. There are some
             | dangerously stupid people out there who regularly advocate
             | for more expensive food.
        
               | one_level_deep2 wrote:
               | Sounds like it's not very widespread at all. How many
               | magazine editors are there in the US?
               | 
               | Maybe don't call others "stupid" when your entire post is
               | creating fictional villains.
        
               | jamiek88 wrote:
               | There's like 3 magazines left in the USA this seems like
               | the strawiest of men.
               | 
               | Thoughtless, pointless rants add nothing to discourse.
        
             | datavirtue wrote:
             | Making food expensive is how governments fall.
        
               | hotnfresh wrote:
               | Right--it's not gonna happen, so food waste isn't gonna
               | get meaningfully better, which makes the constant
               | worrying about it kinda a silly distraction. Unless we
               | _do_ want to talk about increasing the price of food.
        
             | ilyt wrote:
             | > You fix it by making food expensive. I doubt anyone's too
             | keen to do that.
             | 
             | Here is an idea: Move food subsidies from farming industry
             | to people needing it.
             | 
             | Now people needing it most can afford non-crappy food. And
             | industry have to care about wasting now-not-so-cheap food.
        
             | onlyrealcuzzo wrote:
             | The problem isn't that food is cheap.
             | 
             | The problem is that ~20% of the population has food &
             | housing insecurity when we're supposedly ridiculously rich.
             | 
             | I'd argue that the problem is labor is artificially
             | expensive - which prevents all types of things like this
             | from happening - because you can't buy labor for less than
             | $15 an hour after taxes in most cities.
             | 
             | So you can't serve people that make less than a certain
             | amount of money effectively.
             | 
             | People could be employed, making money working in these
             | places - rather than people donating labor - and these same
             | people working jobs like these would have access to these
             | cheaper prepared meals, too.
             | 
             | But, we'll never get that. Nor will we get boarding houses
             | back, because instead of having "slums" we'd rather have a
             | homeless problem and high housing "costs".
        
               | hotnfresh wrote:
               | Reducing the price of labor isn't gonna bring that food
               | insecurity rate down.
               | 
               | And food being very cheap is definitely why there's so
               | much waste. There wasn't, within living memory, and it's
               | because food cost a _way_ bigger share of the median wage
               | than it does today. Talk to some folks who grew up poor
               | in the 40s and 50s about their cuisine, and they'll tell
               | you about what low-food-waste living looks like.
        
               | onlyrealcuzzo wrote:
               | > Reducing the price of labor isn't gonna bring that food
               | insecurity rate down.
               | 
               | The goal isn't to reduce the cost of labor.
               | 
               | The goal is to unlock low-cost labor that is currently
               | priced out.
               | 
               | We only have ~60% workforce participation.
               | 
               | The ultra-poor community could be served BY the ultra-
               | poor community - and then a large percentage of them
               | could go from ultra-poor to regular-poor, having a place
               | to live and struggling to make ends meet instead of being
               | homeless & hungry.
               | 
               | But that's not possible. Because we decided if you're not
               | worth $15 an hour - you're worth nothing.
        
               | decremental wrote:
               | [dead]
        
               | richiebful1 wrote:
               | I highly doubt the minimum wage is the cause of these
               | issues. In places like urban Pennsylvania, where the
               | minimum wage is still 7.25 USD, there's hardly any jobs
               | that start at $7.25. The real issue with labor
               | participation is no one can survive on $7.25/hr, so it
               | becomes more realistic to sit at home and collect
               | disability. The government should be subsidizing labor at
               | the low end -- maybe paying workers an additional $5/hr
               | under a certain wage -- to incentivize work
        
               | onlyrealcuzzo wrote:
               | You don't tend to have high amounts of ultra-poor people
               | in low-cost-of-living areas (which also have lower
               | minimum wages than the high-cost areas with the higher
               | minimum wages).
               | 
               | Montgomery, Al is known as a "poor" area - and yet there
               | are only ~330 homeless people in a city of ~200k people
               | (0.165%). In SF you have about ~8800 homeless people in a
               | city of ~880k (1%).
               | 
               | If you're looking at somewhere like Rural PA - you're
               | already not going to be able to employ people at low
               | wages - because you're going to need to pay them almost
               | $4 per hour just to get to and from work.
        
               | FireBeyond wrote:
               | > Montgomery, Al is known as a "poor" area - and yet
               | there are only ~330 homeless people in a city of ~200k
               | people (0.165%). In SF you have about ~8800 homeless
               | people in a city of ~880k (1%).
               | 
               | I'd have to imagine that police in Alabama are probably a
               | lot more aggressive in "running off" homeless people.
        
               | hotnfresh wrote:
               | Have you... lived in those kind of places? One side of my
               | family's from _not even that bad_ of one, and there are
               | tons of the ultra-poor. They're the ones living in a
               | house with a blue tarp on part of the roof, three broken
               | cars in the yard, overgrown weeds right up to the
               | foundation, et c. The land's owned by some family member
               | (all three crappy acres are worth $2,000 total--the house
               | is worth negative dollars--so it's not like they're
               | giving up a fortune to let them stay there) or is an
               | illegal rental. They often have one or two even-worse-off
               | buddies living with them. Income and hand-me-downs
               | (clothes, anppliances, old cars they'll break and not be
               | able to repair within a year which'll join the front yard
               | scrap pile) are from family and churches. Income, if any,
               | is government assistance (lots of vets) and odd jobs.
               | They have a bunch of health problems and are probably
               | addicted to something. If they don't have family to get
               | them to the hospital 90 minutes away, they do without.
               | They die decades younger than they might.
               | 
               | These are my people, and it gets _worse_ than that. Rural
               | America is shockingly poor. The cost of living's low
               | because nobody there can afford to pay more, and because
               | they have no local public services to speak of.
               | 
               | [edit] the reason, specifically, there aren't more
               | homeless those places isn't because it's better, but
               | because 1) nobody moves in, so 100% of people have family
               | ties of some kind, at least some background that gets
               | them access to a hovel or something, and 2) if you're
               | actually homeless there, you get picked up and shipped
               | somewhere they can actually serve homeless people (or
               | just go to prison), or _you die_.
        
               | onlyrealcuzzo wrote:
               | > These are my people, and it gets worse than that. Rural
               | America is shockingly poor.
               | 
               | And yet unemployment is lower than in places like SF, and
               | homelessness is also lower, so is hunger.
               | 
               | I think you're forgetting how shockingly poor the entire
               | world is.
        
               | MattGaiser wrote:
               | > I'd argue that the problem is labor is artificially
               | expensive - which prevents all types of things like this
               | from happening - because you can't buy labor for less
               | than $15 an hour after taxes in most cities.
               | 
               | You can barely buy labour for $18 an hour. If there were
               | a ton of surplus labour with the limiting factor being
               | the law, labour would be priced at $15 an hour and
               | unemployment would be high. But it seems to be priced
               | well above that at the moment and unemployment is low.
        
               | stevenwoo wrote:
               | Farm labor (in the USA) has much lower minimum wage and
               | safety protections compared to most other work, enforced
               | by federal law, though I don't know how consequential the
               | farm cost part of the equation is by the time the food
               | gets to the restaurant or dinner table.
        
               | mrguyorama wrote:
               | Farm labor in the US is largely divorced from the minimum
               | wage because it largely uses undocumented and illegal
               | immigrants, with threat of deportation for any back chat.
               | This was true even in Northern Maine, 2000 miles from the
               | border. These people do NOT make $15 an hour. I don't
               | think they even make $7.25 an hour.
        
               | hotnfresh wrote:
               | Even _legal_ immigrant farm labor can be paid under
               | minimum wage.
               | 
               | Child labor laws are also fudged a bit for that specific
               | category. Like, by law, they are, not just by convention.
        
               | dragonwriter wrote:
               | > Even legal immigrant farm labor can be paid under
               | minimum wage.
               | 
               |  _Certain_ farm laborers have a lower minimum wage, and
               | _all_ farm laborers are federally exempt from overtime
               | pay.
        
             | sokoloff wrote:
             | That cure seems far worse than the disease.
             | 
             | If food is inexpensive compared to labor and, therefore
             | subject to be wasted, that seems like a good thing overall
             | (at least as compared to the alternatives) rather than a
             | thing that "must be fixed".
        
         | giantg2 wrote:
         | Some stores do donate soon to expire food to food banks.
        
         | pif wrote:
         | > These kitchens can consume food waste
         | 
         | The risk of customers becoming community kitchen dwellers could
         | be too high for the store. Stores need people buying the
         | produce from the shelf, rather than helping themselves from the
         | bin.
        
           | ketzo wrote:
           | This could happen in theory, yeah, but in reality (especially
           | in America) I think there's zero chance of that happening at
           | meaningful levels
           | 
           | The audience who buys high-margin grocery items is almost
           | entirely separate from the audience who would even semi-
           | regularly eat at a community kitchen.
        
             | tivert wrote:
             | > The audience who buys high-margin grocery items is almost
             | entirely separate from the audience who would even semi-
             | regularly eat at a community kitchen.
             | 
             | Also many of the people who buy "high-margin grocery items"
             | won't want to be _physically near_ anyone who would  "even
             | semi-regularly eat at a community kitchen." Any store that
             | ran a community kitchen to consume food waste would likely
             | attract a homeless encampment. Even extremely
             | liberal/progressive upscale shoppers would angrily
             | complain.
        
         | PH95VuimJjqBqy wrote:
         | silly question, but wouldn't that be called a restaurant or a
         | cafe?
        
         | bdcravens wrote:
         | I don't have statistics on how many, but I know that some
         | grocery stores donate end of shelf-life produce to food banks.
        
         | boplicity wrote:
         | RE: Basil. If you have a window that gets a lot of light, it
         | can be very easy for a basil plant to thrive in it. We spent
         | around $15 setting this up in June -- including the cost of a
         | pot, soil, and basil starts. We've been eating basil since, in
         | many meals. That's not free, but it's resulted in very low cast
         | basil for us, always on hand. We also have rosemary and thyme
         | growing in the window. A window with good light and space for
         | plants can result in low cost, high quality herbs, with
         | relatively low effort.
        
           | dunham wrote:
           | I usually put grocery store basil in a glass of water on the
           | window sill until it gets roots, and then transplant it.
           | Basil has a tough time in the winter (not enough light). It
           | works with sage, rosemary, thyme, and mint. I've even done
           | this with the thai basil that came with take out Pho.
           | 
           | Carrot family plants like parsley and cilantro will not get
           | roots.
           | 
           | I also have rosemary, thyme, and sage outdoors - they survive
           | year-round in Seattle. Not everybody has the space or climate
           | for it, but they're low maintenance and it's nice to just go
           | out and grab some fresh herbs.
        
           | gnicholas wrote:
           | What sort of soil do you use? We regularly buy and kill basil
           | plants at TJ's, and I think I've narrowed down the issue to
           | the fact that they give you junky soil that won't sustain the
           | plant long (regardless of watering or sunlight).
        
             | asimpletune wrote:
             | You need to break apart the basil and distribute it evenly
             | in a larger pot. Supermarket basil has fertilizer that
             | makes them grow super fast and look good on the shelves,
             | but what you're buying is actually a bunch of little plants
             | that will exhaust the nutrients unless they're broken up.
        
               | gnicholas wrote:
               | Interesting -- how do you break the plant apart? It
               | appears to have one "trunk" where it goes into the soil,
               | so do you just pull off "branches"?
        
               | asimpletune wrote:
               | If there is really one trunk then you can't break it
               | apart further. However, most basil plants sold at the
               | grocery store are just a bunch of small ones grown
               | closely together. To break it up, just prepare a bigger
               | pot, with potting soil, and then remove the basil from
               | its store-bought container and split it apart with your
               | hands. You want to create a few even groups to go in the
               | new, bigger pot. Ideally, there would be one plant per
               | group, but you don't want to break them up too much and
               | risk tearing the roots too much. I just did four quarters
               | and it's worked fine. I have a huge basil thing now and I
               | did it in a long, skinny rectangular pot.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | neves wrote:
           | The key here is the "high quality". There is nothing like
           | fresh herbs with no pesticides.
        
         | pradn wrote:
         | It took me a little while to realize this. In Manhattan, I can
         | get a pound of fresh pasta from Citarella for $6, their jarred
         | tomato sauce for another $6 (quite enough for a pound of
         | pasta), a lovely block of sufficient Parmesan for $3, enough
         | onion and garlic for like $1 or something - but the garnish,
         | basil, is $5 a bunch. And you can't get a tiny, garnish-
         | sufficient amount either. It also works in the pasta itself,
         | and you might as well throw it in there because you surely
         | aren't going to use the whole bunch if you don't.
         | 
         | So $16/4 ~= $4 per portion for absolutely delicious pasta. And
         | about $5 per portion with basil. Of course, it'll be even
         | better if you make your own tomato sauce and all.
         | 
         | The bare-bones option is: $3 for Barilla pasta, $4 for jarred
         | tomato sauce, and like $1 for onion and garlic. You'll skip the
         | block of Parmesan and basil, of course. But then it's ~$2 per
         | portion. Saving $2 for such a drop in taste is not really worth
         | it. You may skip the cheese, just to avoid eating such a rich
         | meal.
        
         | pcl wrote:
         | Sounds a bit like the deli counter.
        
         | zie wrote:
         | Like others have mentioned the big problem with your idea is
         | grocery chains already do this to varying degrees, except the
         | food goes to local food banks, homeless shelters(that offer hot
         | meals), etc.
         | 
         | Food Banks actually have a whole interesting economy they
         | handle within themselves with "fake" money. It's pretty neat.
         | 
         | Grocery Outlet is the big chain that takes "waste" food and
         | other smaller retail stores do the same thing(s).
         | 
         | It's not exactly the same as what you are talking about, as
         | it's generally on the other side of the equation, it's all the
         | "left over" food that never makes it to the grocery store,
         | because the manufacturers over-produced, essentially.
         | 
         | Not all of the items are strictly near expiration, but a very
         | large portion of them are near or past expiration in practice.
        
           | ballenf wrote:
           | In the US, food banks I've volunteered at had very strict
           | food expiration policies and wouldn't (couldn't?) offer any
           | food very near expiration. They threw out huge quantities of
           | food. Also turned away even more donations for same reason.
           | 
           | They were operating under federal funding, which the workers
           | seemed to imply required the policy.
        
             | zie wrote:
             | That must be new (I haven't volunteered since Covid) or
             | just not implemented at the ones I've worked with. The ones
             | I worked with totally didn't care about things like that,
             | and let the customers make their own decisions around
             | taking an item or not. We would occasionally pick out
             | totally rotten or fuzzy stuff. None of them had federal
             | funding though.
             | 
             | I regularly see past-expiration stuff at Grocery Outlet
             | stores and other discount grocery stores like that still
             | being sold.
        
         | avgcorrection wrote:
         | > It's surprising we don't have this already in North America
         | given how much surplus food is produced.
         | 
         | If that would work and people would use it then it isn't
         | surprising. Supply and demand. More supply, less demand for the
         | produce that costs money
        
         | civilitty wrote:
         | As far as I know, most chain grocery stores in urban areas
         | already donate their expiring food. My local Trader Joes and
         | Ralphs have each donated hundreds of thousands of dollars of
         | food so far this year - they both have signs advertising their
         | donations that they update weekly with the new figures.
         | 
         | The problem in my city is labor - there simply isn't enough
         | manpower to convert all that produce into healthy food so they
         | end up dispensing mostly the less healthy processed stuff,
         | which also tends to have lower spoilage and higher
         | "utilization" at the supermarket so there's never enough to go
         | around based on peoples preferences. Whenever I volunteer at
         | the local shelter, anyone who wants fresh produce can just ask
         | for it but most people wanted (needed) hot prepared meals that
         | tasted familiar and comforting.
        
         | Kalium wrote:
         | As a rule, offering a service that people feel low-status when
         | using is a sub-optimal approach. Eating "expired" or "old" or
         | even "didn't sell" produce doesn't feel dignified to most
         | people. It feels like being a charity case, like being pitied.
         | This can be acceptable in private, but having to take action in
         | public and be visible is humiliating. People care about feeling
         | dignified and will make personal sacrifices to maintain that
         | feeling.
         | 
         | What you're describing is a soup kitchen rebranded. Plus some
         | extra logistical issues from the 24/7 model.
         | 
         | With that in mind, you may want to investigate how your local
         | soup kitchens get their materials. Your idea may be closer to
         | reality than you think.
        
           | Workaccount2 wrote:
           | Reminds me of when I was young I did a volunteer session at
           | soup kitchen for the needy. After dinner was served we went
           | around and collected the used dinnerware from the patrons
           | there.
           | 
           | I went to one lady and took her plate, upon which she angrily
           | scoffed at me "I can take my own plate up! I am not one of
           | the guests here!".
           | 
           | She was in fact one of the guests.
        
             | mrguyorama wrote:
             | Maybe if our society didn't tie so much of your self worth
             | and value to an job, people without jobs wouldn't feel so
             | garbage on top of having a difficult life.
        
               | [deleted]
        
           | datavirtue wrote:
           | Hmmm....that's basically what most people eat. Old ground up
           | produce in processed foods. 70% of calorie consumption in the
           | US.
        
           | Eisenstein wrote:
           | Just spin it right and you will be fine. Market it as a way
           | to offset your carbon footprint and call it something hippy-
           | ish, and instead of charging money make people plant
           | something or bring in a battery or an old piece of tech to
           | recycle. Whatever works for the type of community it is in.
        
         | jeffbee wrote:
         | In addition to the food surplus you're going to need a labor
         | surplus and that doesn't exist in America.
        
         | euroderf wrote:
         | > This would be a place where a meal is always available, all
         | hours of the day, for free, to anyone who walks in.
         | 
         | How about vending machines that scan an ID and dispense
         | nutritious (but bland) biscuits ?
        
         | Spivak wrote:
         | It's my literal lifetime dream to open one of these. If anyone
         | has any tips on how to get the right connections to make it
         | feasible I'm all ears.
         | 
         | All the trappings for a commercial kitchen and getting a space
         | to work out of is fine but it's the nonprofit fundraising and
         | grocery store food-pantry connections that seem impossible.
         | I've basically resigned to starting at micro scale to get
         | around the first one but actually getting a steady stream of
         | food without pissing off the powers that be is an uphill
         | battle.
        
           | toast0 wrote:
           | Work/volunteer/consult at grocery stores and food banks and
           | you'll make connections with people at grocery stores and
           | food banks.
           | 
           | Ask questions like "hey, who are those guys taking the stuff
           | we pulled off the shelves cause it was expiring?" or "where
           | does all this food that's right around the expiration date
           | come from?"
        
         | 1MachineElf wrote:
         | >A fresh batch of basil at the grocery store is essentially a
         | luxury item
         | 
         | Not in Vietnam, and not in the Chinese (Great Wall)/Korean
         | (Hmart, Lotte) grocery chains in the US. Eating a whole sprig
         | of basil is common in various Vietnamese meals. My point is
         | that basil doesn't have to be a luxury item. It grows very well
         | without much effort.
        
         | cameronh90 wrote:
         | > A fresh batch of basil at the grocery store is essentially a
         | luxury item, exclusive to those who can afford it
         | 
         | I grow a fair amount my food on my allotment, and one of the
         | interesting things I've noticed is how little the grocery store
         | prices are related to the effort it takes to grow it myself.
         | 
         | For example, I no longer grow potatoes except for rotation
         | purposes, because the time and inputs (fertilizer, etc.) aren't
         | worth it compared to PS0.5 per 1kg of potatoes from the
         | supermarket.
         | 
         | On the other hand, basil is extremely fast growing and doesn't
         | need any fertilizer, other than a bit of manure/compost at the
         | start of the season. From my basil bed, I get about 50kg in a
         | season, which has an ASDA street value of about PS1000.
         | 
         | This obviously comes down to things like the ease of mechanical
         | harvesting, the complexity of cold chain logistics, etc. Still,
         | if you have a free windowsill and find supermarket basil
         | ludicrously expensive, it's worth sticking a few Sweet Genovese
         | on there.
        
           | jxcl wrote:
           | What is the size of your basil bed? 50 kg of basil per season
           | seems wonderful!
        
             | cameronh90 wrote:
             | I think it's about 4 metres by 2 metres. I plant quite
             | densely compared to what you'll normally see recommended on
             | the back of a seed packet, and to save on space between
             | rows, I built a wooden frame that I can use to walk over
             | and harvest from the top. Probably not very safe, but
             | luckily I don't have to report to the HSE!
             | 
             | I also start them off indoors and plant out early since
             | London has a rather mild climate.
             | 
             | Also: it smells bloody amazing.
        
               | thefcpk wrote:
               | but what do you do with 50kg of basil... I love pesto and
               | it's a great addon to many things, but I don't see myself
               | using more than a couple hundred g per week.
        
               | cameronh90 wrote:
               | Once you have an abundance of it, you can really just put
               | it in everything. Anything with tomato is better with
               | basil, plus any sandwiches, salads, pizzas, pasta dishes.
               | I have rabbits, so they get through a lot of fresh herbs
               | (especially the stems) and give me fertilizer back in the
               | form of... little round spheres.
               | 
               | Besides that, I preserve it by making it into pesto,
               | chutneys and other basil-based sauces, oils, jars of
               | dried flakes and freezing it.
               | 
               | Anything I have left over, I give away to friends and
               | family.
        
               | ilyt wrote:
               | pre-seasoning your rabbit I see...
        
           | orbit7 wrote:
           | I keep thinking about doing this, do you have any good
           | sources of info you have followed or do you write about it
           | anywhere?
        
             | cameronh90 wrote:
             | Honestly it's one of those things you just have to try and
             | figure out a bit through trial and error, especially as a
             | lot can depend on your local climate, soil type, etc. If
             | you have any local gardening or allotment groups, the
             | wisdom of the elders can be invaluable, but sometimes you
             | have to go your own way to find out what works for you. My
             | advice would always be start small with easy things like
             | herbs, then work your way up.
             | 
             | Besides that, there are a lot of great resources on
             | YouTube. _Personally_ , I mostly watch the British videos
             | because - bluntly - Americans are very wealthy and always
             | have loads of land, power tools, cheap resources, pick up
             | trucks, backhoes, etc. and I don't have any of that. They
             | also seem to be a lot more _serious_ about it, with
             | homesteading or even borderline industrial setups. The
             | British videos tend to be much more about bodging things on
             | a budget in a small back garden for fun, which is much
             | closer to what I 'm doing! Also I don't have to worry about
             | climactic differences that way.
             | 
             | With that being said, some of my favourite channels are
             | alexgrowsfood, GrowVeg, Charles Dowding, homegrown.garden,
             | My Family Garden, Down to Earth with Jim, Castle Hill
             | Garden, and of course, BBC Gardeners World. I also love
             | (and am a member of) the Royal Horticultural Society.
        
           | Cerium wrote:
           | I always grow basil. About 4 square feet is enough to have
           | pesto sauce once a week.
        
             | cameronh90 wrote:
             | I make a lot of pesto also and freeze it to use it
             | throughout the winter. Garlic is one of my favourite crops.
             | It's not as cost beneficial to grow as basil, but being
             | able to pick the cultivar is amazing.
             | 
             | It's unfortunate that pine nuts are so expensive. We base
             | most of our pesto on other nuts to save money, but you just
             | can't beat the taste of a pine nut pesto IMO.
        
               | Cerium wrote:
               | In my opinion cashews are acceptable, but pine nuts
               | definitely the best.
               | 
               | I make a vegan pesto using the following ingredients:
               | basil, pine nuts, garlic, miso, olive oil. The miso adds
               | the fermented and creamy flavor of the parmesan.
               | 
               | Remove stems from basil, wash and tap to dry, don't spin
               | (a little water is good). Add ingredients to the food
               | processor and blend until desired consistency. Scrape
               | down sides and add oil as needed.
        
           | mywittyname wrote:
           | I've noticed this as well.
           | 
           | I really think there's a market for a grocery store "herb
           | bar." A self-service bed where herbs grow and customers just
           | take what they want. I would think this could greatly lower
           | the expense of selling fresh herbs, since it's probably a
           | easy thing to set and forget with a little automation.
           | 
           | I maintain my own herb garden. $10 of plants and some regular
           | watering keeps me very well stocked with everything I need
           | from spring until fall. I haven't refreshed the soil in five
           | years and everything still grows to fill the entire pot by
           | summer.
        
             | ilyt wrote:
             | People would fuck the plants over within a day. It would at
             | least have someone at the site doing the cutting.
        
           | crazygringo wrote:
           | I tried growing basil in my windowsill. The problem was that
           | I don't use basil at a constant rate; I use it in big bursts
           | or not at all.
           | 
           | Which just doesn't work. I needed to use a bunch of basil,
           | and it was either cut off _all_ the leaves or buy it at the
           | store. So I cut off all the leaves and that was the end of
           | it...
        
             | ska wrote:
             | The "big burst" problem is usually solved by a few (say 4)
             | plants, not one.
             | 
             | But another thing about growing _anything_ is that it works
             | better if you work around it 's schedule rather than the
             | other way around. Hothousing and international shipping
             | have got us out of the habit of thinking seasonally or by
             | growth cycle of a plant, but it's not hard to adapt to.
        
             | pcthrowaway wrote:
             | Add 2 more basil plants and prune 1/3 the leaves when you
             | use it.
             | 
             | Pruning the basil will also cause it to grow bigger and
             | better
        
           | mlinhares wrote:
           | The reality is that farming only works in medium to large
           | scale, people that try to grow food for themselves do it
           | either because they have no other option and will die
           | otherwise or they have too much money and time in their
           | hands.
           | 
           | My grandpa was a medium scale farmer for most of his life and
           | when he retired he kept a couple dozen cows for milk and he
           | paid every single month to keep it going. It was his hobby
           | and he knew that, he said he'd need a couple hundred again to
           | make it at least pay for itself.
           | 
           | It's one of the reasons I LOL hard whenever I hear tech
           | people saying they will "retire and become farmers", these
           | people have no idea what it is like to work on a farm for
           | real.
           | 
           | Farm to Taber is a great listen on farming in general, eye
           | opening for those that have had little to no contact to real
           | world farming: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/farm-to-
           | taber/id166958...
        
             | kozikow wrote:
             | Tech saying "I'll become farmer" to escape tech is very
             | amusing, especially how data-driven the large scale farming
             | is, and how small scale farming is getting priced out by
             | large scale farming.
             | 
             | I'm not a farmer, but I did some tech for farming and you
             | would be surprised how tech driven it is. Agriculture was
             | probably the first industry that used satellite imagery
             | outside of military on the large scale.
             | 
             | If someone is Silicon Valley web app developer and went
             | farming, they actually could be going deeper into tech than
             | escape it.
        
               | ilyt wrote:
               | Yeah I have feeling most of that is "I will live off my
               | savings and have a hobby", rather than actually trying to
               | live off that.
        
               | awavering wrote:
               | I think most people expressing this sentiment are
               | referring to small scale homesteads or hobby farms, which
               | I have found to be a great break from desk time.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | cameronh90 wrote:
             | I broadly agree, and certainly for staples and root crops,
             | it blows my mind how cheap supermarkets can be. The amount
             | of work, land, pesticides, fertilizers, seeds, etc. it
             | takes to grow a few kilogram of carrots manually is insane
             | compared to being able to buy at 50p/kg at the supermarket.
             | That really shows the level of industrialisation and
             | automation involved in large scale farming.
             | 
             | Which is why I focus on specific crops that I've identified
             | as being valuable or useful to me.
             | 
             | Basil, of course, I already mentioned, and similar to basil
             | is other green and leafy veg, such as spinach, mint,
             | coriander, rocket, spring onions and cress. They grow so
             | quickly and easily that I guess the majority of the cost in
             | a supermarket is the packaging and logistics. I also grow a
             | lot of soft fruits such as strawberries because supermarket
             | fruits are expensive and bland tasting compared to a
             | freshly picked ripe strawberry. Squashes are good to grow
             | as they're quite prolific producers without much effort,
             | yet fairly expensive to buy in the supermarket. Garlic,
             | chilli, tomato, runner beans and leeks I grow mainly
             | because I can choose the cultivars I like, and find they're
             | tastier than the ones I can get in the supermarket.
             | 
             | Of course, the biggest input I'm obviously not accounting
             | for is my time, but as it's an enjoyable hobby that's good
             | for my physical and mental health, that doesn't factor in
             | for me. Plus, I think it's a good life skill to know how to
             | grow food, and it's interesting to try and do it in a
             | sustainable way, e.g. permaculture, supporting pollinators,
             | producing your own compost, propagating your own seeds,
             | capturing and storing water onsite, etc.
             | 
             | I certainly wouldn't quit my job and become a farmer, but I
             | do think growing some of your own food is something
             | everyone should at least try once if they have the space.
             | Also as a general rule, animals require a larger scale to
             | make a profit than do vegetables.
        
             | o0banky0o wrote:
             | It sounds like tech folks want to do like your grandpa
             | wanted, even though they're paying to sustain it
        
             | datavirtue wrote:
             | This dynamic changes if they are growing produce to
             | manufacture value added,preserves items.
             | 
             | If you are producing cheese, or tomato sauce, or pesto, for
             | example, the farming activity makes a lot more sense
             | financially. Trying to grow and sell produce is a non-
             | starter. If you can turn it into a shelvable, in-demand,
             | item you can diversify and greatly increase or even just
             | capture profit that you would normally lose.
             | 
             | As I mentioned, diversity is key. You can just deal in one
             | or a few crops. You have to have a range of crops and value
             | added products distributed to a variety of markets and you
             | need to be selling directly.
             | 
             | We have some ultra small farms working here in Ohio doing
             | very well and many have been for generations. It's damn
             | near foolish to shop Kroger for produce here. I know I
             | don't. Not until the ice hits.
        
               | mlinhares wrote:
               | Even producing value-added items is a lot of work and
               | mostly a labour of love than of business and this is
               | assuming you have all the stuff you need available around
               | you. These farms in Ohio are the outliers, even here in
               | Florida, where you can technically grow almost the whole
               | year, small farms are rare and usually pretty close to
               | the big cities, most of the time serving as tourist
               | destinations.
               | 
               | If you're going to make cheese, you'll need a lot of cows
               | (even for cheap cheese you'd need at least 10 liters of
               | milk to get to a kilo of cheese) or someone near you that
               | produces enough milk for you to buy and make cheese out
               | of it.
               | 
               | Food production is a heavily specialized, mechanized and
               | complicated job, you need a lot of support and resources
               | around you even for basic canning and dairy products. And
               | then you also have to figure out a way to sell these
               | products to someone at a price they're willing to pay.
               | 
               | It's not by accident you'll see areas heavily focused on
               | specific products (like Winsconsin and cheese) because
               | everyone is, intentionally or not, pooling resources and
               | creating the infrastructure to make it all possible.
               | 
               | There's a traditional soft cheese that is a staple where
               | I'm from in Brazil that is made like queso fresco, but we
               | mix in clarified butter at the end of the cook (it's
               | called butter cheese/queijo de manteiga) that is at risk
               | of disappearing because it's getting harder and harder to
               | produce it locally due to the lack of milk producers and
               | other infrastructure as most milk production has moved
               | elsewhere.
        
               | ilyt wrote:
               | > There's a traditional soft cheese that is a staple
               | where I'm from in Brazil that is made like queso fresco,
               | but we mix in clarified butter at the end of the cook
               | (it's called butter cheese/queijo de manteiga) that is at
               | risk of disappearing because it's getting harder and
               | harder to produce it locally due to the lack of milk
               | producers and other infrastructure as most milk
               | production has moved elsewhere.
               | 
               | are there no vertically integrated cheese production
               | there ? If there is demand for milk why cow farmers are
               | moving away?
        
             | hattmall wrote:
             | Yeah, if your granddad kept 24+ cows just for his own milk
             | needs then that's surely a loss, but that's atypical and
             | extremely inefficient. My family is similar, and my
             | grandfather was a dairy farmer, but that was the first
             | thing to go. A dairy is one of the things that scales very
             | well and is just cheaper and easier to buy mass produced
             | milk, but we still garden and raise animals for meat and
             | produce an abundance on a few acres. Grazing animals take
             | up a lot of space so I'm referring to just the garden.
             | Cows, goats, chickens, geese, hogs to root out nutgrass.
             | Deer and rabbits are so plentiful they are a problem. Our
             | main external input that we can't really self source is
             | fuel for the tractor. It's not a massive operation by any
             | means and not a major source of income as everyone has
             | normal non-farming jobs. But it's not a loss, produces far
             | more than we need with not an extreme amount of labor. It's
             | a 100+ year old farm and is mostly forest and timberland
             | now but used to be cotton fields.
             | 
             | It's really not that crazy of an idea to be a mostly self
             | sufficient farm. I would say that including non-grazed
             | pasture we have under 8 acres for crops. Probably an
             | additional 30 for grazing. Of course we buy groceries of
             | things we don't grow but if that wasn't an option we would
             | still eat plenty just less varied.
             | 
             | The important thing is to just have good land I think. Most
             | of Americas farmland isn't great land for farming, it's
             | just flat or ideal for a specific crop, which is great for
             | mass production. The downside is that it's less productive
             | and requires a ton of inputs with a limited and very time
             | sensitive growing season.
        
             | awavering wrote:
             | I largely agree, but I think there's room for small-scale
             | operations to grow hard-to-transport food (mulberries!)
             | while preserving local varieties and serving as a genetic
             | repository. In a sense, it's insurance against failures and
             | shortcomings of the global food system - it'd be more
             | efficient to go without, but it's nice to maintain a backup
             | system of plants, systems, and knowledge.
        
             | gdubs wrote:
             | I own a farm and while I agree that people generally have
             | no idea what goes into farming, I feel like the "tech
             | workers would cry if they ever had to actually farm"
             | statement that is so common on these types of threads is
             | usually coming from someone with experience on a
             | conventional farm.
             | 
             | There are alternative methods of farming like permaculture,
             | and people all over the world use them to grow an abundance
             | of food in an area not much bigger than a large backyard.
             | They are specifically geared towards better utilization of
             | space, and creating natural systems that replace the need
             | for traditional inputs and labor.
             | 
             | Growing someone's entire diet is no small challenge, this
             | is true. But it's also not an all-or-nothing proposition.
             | Someone with zero experience farming could plant some
             | perennial herbs on their balcony, and discover the joy of
             | cooking with them (and replacing a $5 plastic clamshell of
             | Thai basil.) From there, year-by-year, people can get more
             | ambitious with what they grow.
        
               | ilyt wrote:
               | > I own a farm and while I agree that people generally
               | have no idea what goes into farming, I feel like the
               | "tech workers would cry if they ever had to actually
               | farm" statement that is so common on these types of
               | threads is usually coming from someone with experience on
               | a conventional farm.
               | 
               | But it's comparison of "job in IT vs job in farming"
               | (i.e. actually making money in both cases), and not "just
               | farming enough for your food needs"
               | 
               | "making enough for your needs" is few crates of apples,
               | not working whole day with a bunch of temporary workers
               | gathering it while tractors are going around gathering
               | the crates, often in burning sun.
               | 
               | Turning it around it would be like saying "job in IT is
               | SUPER easy" but meaning just setting up a home router
               | once a week (because that's what "farming for yourself"
               | is compared to running profitable farm)
        
             | jmbwell wrote:
             | > It's one of the reasons I LOL hard whenever I hear tech
             | people saying they will "retire and become farmers", these
             | people have no idea what it is like to work on a farm for
             | real.
             | 
             | When I hear this sentiment expressed and/or express this
             | sentiment myself, it generally has nothing to do with the
             | farming, but is rather meant to convey an interest in a
             | life as far removed as possible from the stresses and
             | bullshit and growing moral conflicts of working in tech.
             | 
             | Of course, there is probably no industry that is immune
             | from any of these things, or even immune from tech itself.
             | 
             | But consider all of the posturing of the "farmer" being of-
             | the-land and small-town and away from the chaos of city
             | life and away from Silicon Valley ivory towers. All the
             | folksy hokey drawl and front-porch iced-tea that people
             | like to put up, especially politicians and entertainment
             | performers in the country music industry. All the idyllic
             | glorification of the people who "feed the world." It's all
             | beautiful sunrises over fields of grain, people in work
             | clothes who don't have much but still have it all.
             | Obviously, none of that reflects reality any more than a
             | tech worker jumping into that world. It overlooks the
             | backbreaking, bank-breaking labor involved at the lowest
             | levels, and the exploitation of an entire sector of the
             | economy from top to bottom, beginning with government
             | subsidies handed out to a rapidly growing corporate
             | oligarchy swallowing up family farms that have produced our
             | food for generations and converting them to nightmarish
             | factory farming operations of unspeakable horrors. But if
             | golden sunrises is what people want to pretend it is, then
             | that's as good as anything for a tech worker to pretend to
             | want when they fantasize about standing up from their seat
             | at a row of workstations in a FAANG labor facility and
             | walking out.
             | 
             | Of course "these people have no idea what it is like to
             | work on a farm for real." Nobody who hasn't done it does.
             | Just like nobody who hasn't worked in tech knows what it is
             | like working in tech for real.
             | 
             | The point isn't to sincerely go into farming. The point is
             | to imagine getting out of an industry that mills
             | "intellectual labor" into advertising revenue for
             | billionaires. If people like to imagine "flyover country"
             | being some unspoiled unappreciated paradise, then people
             | who genuinely want to get off of the "elitist coasts" are
             | going to imagine going there. If it happens to call the
             | cultural bluff on farming being some quaint, pastoral life
             | of simple but rewarding hard work, that's hardly the tech
             | worker's fault. The blame for that most likely lies with
             | the people in power who stand to benefit from sustaining
             | that fantasy -- who are often among the same people who
             | benefit from the fantasy that tech work is all pinball
             | machines and free sodas for typing on computers.
             | 
             | LOL, if that's your coping mechanism. But while one might
             | laugh at a worker wanting to jump from one bleak industry
             | to another bleak industry, the people who profit from all
             | of this bleakness go on profiting. If we have a problem
             | with the fantasies, then maybe we should do something about
             | the realities first.
        
             | HEmanZ wrote:
             | Do you think people who say they will retire and become
             | farmers think they're going to become like legit, money
             | making farmers? Or do you think they know they want a
             | constructive hobby close to the earth to do while they wait
             | to die, and "farming" (almost always meaning hobby farming)
             | sounds like a constructive hobby to wait out the end?
             | 
             | It's a meme at this point to make fun of people who want to
             | do some form of labor that doesn't make a good career when
             | they retire. Of course farming is a worse job than being a
             | developer, that's why this person is a developer! But many
             | things that make hard or even terrible jobs make great
             | hobbies when you're not doing it to make a career. And
             | people who like to get things done still often don't want
             | their last accomplishment before they die to be "delivered
             | corporate value in Q3 by..."
        
             | hn_throwaway_99 wrote:
             | > people that try to grow food for themselves do it either
             | because they have no other option and will die otherwise or
             | they have too much money and time in their hands.
             | 
             | Most people that I know that have backyard gardens aren't
             | doing it for the majority of their calories (I don't know
             | people growing wheat in their backyard), but lots of people
             | grow in their backyard because it is more convenient and
             | the vegetables are always fresh and flavorful.
             | 
             | I grow an herb garden with stuff like basil, chives,
             | parsley, oregano, etc. plus some smaller vegetables like
             | peppers and tomatoes. I grow the herbs because many times
             | they don't even have fresh herbs available at the
             | supermarket or are inconvenient (e.g. a giant thing of
             | parsley when I just want a few snips), and the vegetables
             | taste better.
        
               | wizerdrobe wrote:
               | Herbs should be anyone's starter for a garden and
               | absolutely makes for an easy break-even.
               | 
               | We had a great run with heirloom (Cherokee Purple)
               | tomatoes this year, purchased for $5.99 per plant at
               | Lowe's. Our raised bed cost about $100 to build and fill
               | with soil. I spent $100 to build a deer fence. I also
               | bought a $20 jug of Miracle Grow feed. Let's just
               | cocktail-napkin the water at $10 for the season, and say
               | I have $250 in input to start my garden this year.
               | 
               | I got, at most, $15 dollars worth of tomatoes for the two
               | plants. I could increase that and get into canning to
               | reap some more value, but it's a hobby to produce neat
               | exotics I can't even buy if I wanted to. Hopefully I can
               | amortize the upstart costs over the years and achieve a
               | break even on a long enough timescale :)
        
               | ilyt wrote:
               | No offense but that seems like most expensive way to farm
               | it. I mean I get it, you want something that looks nice
               | _and_ works, and not is just an old bucket filled with
               | dirt (which is perfectly fine way to recycle broken
               | bucket, just ugly one), but if you just want tomatoes you
               | don 't need to spend all that much so that cost is a bit
               | overcalculated imo.
               | 
               | But still, yeah, at that scale its not much more than a
               | hobby, certainly not a way to save any actual money.
               | 
               | > Hopefully I can amortize the upstart costs over the
               | years and achieve a break even on a long enough timescale
               | :)
               | 
               | Or some disease or insect will destroy it. The _wonders_
               | of farming...
        
               | Scoundreller wrote:
               | > $5.99 per plant
               | 
               | Buy seeds, plant some in a beer cup of potting soil
               | ~30-45d before the last frost. Don't need to worry with
               | seed starting mix. Don't worry about how tall they get,
               | just plant it almost all sideways.
               | 
               | > I got, at most, $15 dollars worth of tomatoes for the
               | two plants
               | 
               | What were your lbs of yield per plant?
               | 
               | I do cherry tomatoes in 5gal buckets and get ~1.5-2 lbs
               | per bucket. Soil mix is leftovers from contractors mixed
               | with composter stuff and peat moss. Actual garden does
               | better. Retail price for that qty is $7. I have too many
               | buckets set up...
        
               | pixl97 wrote:
               | I'd love to grow tomatoes, but I live where it's too hot
               | and they'll stop flowering sometime in June.
               | 
               | But I'm wondering if you're not growing your tomatoes
               | right, or the cultivars you have are not great? One of
               | the biggest issues I run into when I lived somewhere I
               | could grow is the plants getting so large they uproot the
               | posts I have them staked up with if it gets windy.
               | 
               | Good soil goes a long way, you'll want it to be mostly a
               | decomposed manure. Then you'll really want to get the
               | biggest plant you can find at the store as early as
               | weather allows, then bury most of the plant you buy. If
               | you're just planting it like a normal plant, you've
               | wasted a ton of its potential.
               | 
               | In one of the best years I've had my plants grew nearly 8
               | feet tall and with only 4 bushes I had to have the kids
               | load up a wagon with tomatoes and give away them to the
               | neighbors I had so many.
        
               | zargon wrote:
               | Cherokee Purple and Black Krim are two of my favorites,
               | but they admittedly don't always grow quite as vigorously
               | as some other (less tasty) varieties. Still, they grow 5
               | to 6 feet high and produce 40+ pounds of fruit per plant.
               | And the tomato growing season here is only mid-May
               | through mid-September.
        
               | mythrwy wrote:
               | Can verify, and of the two, Krim has the better flavor in
               | my opinion. But they do not produce like the hybrids and
               | the Krims tend to crack.
               | 
               | Another (cherry) that is really tasty is Rosella (a dark
               | purplish variety like the other two). So tasty.
        
               | ilyt wrote:
               | >then bury most of the plant you buy. If you're just
               | planting it like a normal plant, you've wasted a ton of
               | its potential.
               | 
               | Elaborate ?
        
               | mythrwy wrote:
               | Check this stuff out for growing tomatoes where it is
               | hot.
               | 
               | https://shadeclothstore.com/product-category/aluminet-
               | shade-...
               | 
               | I've had great success with the 40% setting tomatoes all
               | season and my temps push 110F in the summer. One thing I
               | learned the hard way, in addition to this, leave the
               | plants bushy so it shades internally.
        
               | pixl97 wrote:
               | Eh, this year we had over 60 days of 100F+ weather, with
               | temps not going below 85 at night for a considerable
               | portion of that. Even if I grow them in the shade of the
               | porch they won't get flowers for a month at a time.
        
             | ilyt wrote:
             | My dad pretty much went from "doing well" to "dropping it
             | and getting different job while selling land to
             | development" within the span of my childhood and teenage
             | years.
             | 
             | Small farming was viable few decades ago, now you'd have to
             | make some speciality fancy food there to be profitable, not
             | anything mass market.
             | 
             | Small vinery? Sure you might have _some_ chance. Potatoes
             | and wheat ? Good fucking luck.
             | 
             | > It's one of the reasons I LOL hard whenever I hear tech
             | people saying they will "retire and become farmers", these
             | people have no idea what it is like to work on a farm for
             | real.
             | 
             | Clarkson's farm is essentially a documentary about that
             | lmao. Rich man invests a lot and with ton of help earns
             | less than a thousand a year from quite a lot of land.
        
             | aleksiy123 wrote:
             | I don't think thats entirely true depending on what
             | definition of farm is being used and where its located.
             | 
             | My grandparents live in Ukraine and do just fine growing
             | most of their food on a small plot of land and their
             | pension.
             | 
             | Tomatoes, cabbage, potatoes, watermelon, cucumbers, some
             | other stuff I've forgotten and bees for honey.
             | 
             | They definitely do not have too much money on their hands.
             | Time yes but thats no different then for anyone retiring?
        
           | swader999 wrote:
           | I think this is a smart way to go. I'll grow my own things
           | for better taste too.
        
           | callalex wrote:
           | The subsidy/grant/handout system for food production and
           | distribution is very nuanced and piecemeal so the individual
           | price of foods ends up seemingly random.
        
           | gs17 wrote:
           | I noticed the same thing, a few stores have basil plants for
           | sale at prices which always confuse me. Buying a $6 plant
           | (not sure what Trader Joe's has them for these days), even if
           | I was immediately stripping all the leaves off it is
           | sometimes a better deal by itself.
        
           | jamal-kumar wrote:
           | I was taught by a couple of friends from Italy about how to
           | harvest the seeds and re-grow them, very easy to do. Probably
           | my favorite plant to cultivate now considering how simple it
           | is to grow it, it's always nicer to have fresh herbs than
           | store-bought (often going bad) or dry (no flavour). There is
           | a key time to harvest but I think it depends on the climate
           | you're in so I can't really advise on that unless you live in
           | koppen zone AF.
           | 
           | Mint is about the same and I think even more easy.
           | 
           | One of the things about herbs is that alot of them are great
           | chelating agents for soil. It's something to be aware of
           | because if for example your soil is rich in arsenic, cadmium
           | or lead, you can remediate some of it out with oregano or
           | thyme but since these things absorb enough of that to become
           | a potential hazard to health it's actually fairly prudent to
           | grow your own as consumer reports has pointed out that all
           | brands they have tested in stores have this crap in them [1],
           | especially if you're gardening in an urban setting [2]
           | 
           | [1] https://www.consumerreports.org/health/food-safety/your-
           | herb...
           | 
           | [2] https://clf.jhsph.edu/sites/default/files/2019-03/suh-
           | soil-t...
        
             | civilitty wrote:
             | If you're growing the herbs in planters, it pays to use a
             | custom potting mix that is 1 part peat moss, 1 part
             | compost, and 1 part vermiculite. It eliminates most risk of
             | heavy metals and provides a very light and fluffy medium
             | with lots of aeration and water retention.
        
               | pixl97 wrote:
               | Honestly the water retention alone is more than worth the
               | soil costs with the potting mix. Many herbs can be very
               | sensitive to water/heat and good control here allows the
               | plants to grow much larger and more resilient.
        
               | cameronh90 wrote:
               | As fantastic as peat moss is, I have to recommend
               | considering an alternative. Peat moss isn't sustainable,
               | and at least in Europe, we don't have too many peat bogs
               | left now. Coco coir is my favourite peat moss
               | alternative, but as it's sterile, you do need to use a
               | bit more organic matter or add some leachate/"compost
               | tea".
        
         | james_pm wrote:
         | Our grocery store literally sells live, potted basil plants for
         | less than a little package of fresh basil. And people still by
         | the packaged basil.
        
         | grecy wrote:
         | > _It 's surprising we don't have this already in North America
         | given how much surplus food is produced_
         | 
         | If you genuinely want to know why, I highly recommend the book
         | Ishmael by Daniel Quinn.
         | 
         | It does a fantastic job of explaining how our society got
         | _really_ messed up the day food was put under lock and key.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-09-20 23:01 UTC)