[HN Gopher] X-ray laser will 'film' chemical reactions in unprec...
___________________________________________________________________
X-ray laser will 'film' chemical reactions in unprecedented detail
Author : gmays
Score : 56 points
Date : 2023-09-19 18:35 UTC (4 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.nature.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.nature.com)
| easythrees wrote:
| Dumb question here, but can X-Ray lasers be used to make CPUs?
| itishappy wrote:
| That's not a dumb question at all! They're next in line, but
| there's a long road ahead!
|
| Modern EUV lithography uses 13.7nm light, barely shy of the
| 10nm cutoff for X-Rays (and that's debatable). Many of the
| problems we'll need to solve are already in-play with EUV
| lithography, but with X-Rays they will be turned up to 11.
| Directing the light is a huge one, most materials are
| transparent to X-Rays so lenses aren't going to work, and
| mirrors are difficult. Building an EUV or X-Ray mirror requires
| coating stacks tens to hundreds of nano-meter thick layers
| thick but still can't manage very high reflectivity. Also, at
| these energies, the light easily ionizes substrate atoms
| knocking electrons out which travel around and affect nearby
| atoms, causing weird non-local stochastic effects.
|
| We've barely started EUV production, there's plenty of room for
| optimization, so I'd bet we're decades away from using X-Rays
| commercially, but you better believe we're trying!
|
| https://www.asml.com/en/products/euv-lithography-systems
|
| https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/x-ray-litho...
| benjaminva wrote:
| Filming is one really interesting application, the other is
| imaging of single proteins without the need for crystallisation.
| I wrote a whole PhD thesis about the idea how to reconstruct the
| three-dimensional electron density from a lot of extremely noisy
| single proteins shots. It will make a huge class of proteins
| experimentally accessible that we couldn't structurally look into
| before.
| pfdietz wrote:
| Hasn't cryoelectron microscopy pretty much taken over for
| protein structure determination?
| eslaught wrote:
| I don't work on this directly, but I do adjacent stuff in the
| computer science research group at SLAC.
|
| Feel free to ask me questions, I guess? (I will not be able to
| say much about the physics.)
| MaxikCZ wrote:
| Neat! Wouldnt powerful xrays change the reaction to be filmed?
| eslaught wrote:
| Again, not a physicist. But my understanding is that on a
| femptosecond timescale (the duration of the x-ray pulse
| generated by LCLS-II), effectively no reactions occur. The
| pulse destroys the sample, so that means you have to pump
| through a steady stream of sample particles to image. So for
| any given experiment, you'll get a stream of what are
| effectively snapshots of the reaction occurring at a given
| moment in time, and then it's up to software post-processing
| to figure out what you're looking at in a given snapshot and
| how far progressed the chemical reaction is at that point.
| natechols wrote:
| I helped with similar experiments at LCLS-I and the first
| half of this comment is correct. The chemical reaction is
| carefully timed on the order of milliseconds, so they get a
| series of snapshots of the reaction at a specific known
| state (but previously unknown structure). There isn't
| enough information in individual snapshots for the
| processing software to do very much with besides combine it
| with other snapshots (thousands of them).
| itishappy wrote:
| Incredible stuff. I can't imagine the undulators are perfectly
| efficient at extracting all the energy from the electron beams.
| What do you guys do with the leftovers?
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-09-19 23:00 UTC)