[HN Gopher] A Line at a Time: The Atari 2600, Now with S-Video
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       A Line at a Time: The Atari 2600, Now with S-Video
        
       Author : zdw
       Score  : 74 points
       Date   : 2023-09-19 06:52 UTC (16 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (nicole.express)
 (TXT) w3m dump (nicole.express)
        
       | joemi wrote:
       | I'm thrilled this was posted, because now I've discovered a great
       | blog to read. This level of writing about these topics are
       | totally what I'm into. I opened most of the links in the post in
       | new tabs, and now I've got a lot of reading to do.
       | 
       | I'm surprised I haven't come across Nicole's blog before now.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | NonNefarious wrote:
       | The Atari computers (except the 400) had S-video from the very
       | beginning, and the JVC-made Commodore 1702 is a great match for
       | them because it has separate luma & chroma inputs.
       | 
       | Interestingly, LaserDisc players, the best consumer video medium
       | until the late '90s, mostly didn't have S-video outputs because
       | the luma & chroma signals were mixed on the disc; providing a
       | separate output for each wouldn't have gained you anything.
        
         | nicole_express wrote:
         | I believe the Atari 8-bit computers' CTIA/GTIA chips generate
         | their video output through pins in much the same way as the
         | TIA, with digital luminance and a color output, so it makes
         | sense that S-Video (or I guess I should say "some sort of
         | separated luminance/chrominance", since the S-Video standard
         | didn't exist yet) would be the way to go for a higher-quality
         | picture there.
        
       | the_third_wave wrote:
       | OT: there is a comment [1] by one _NonNefarious_ which seems to
       | have been killed instantly (dead 7 minutes after posting). The
       | comment itself seems to be relevant, free from the sort of claims
       | and /or language which tend to get comments killed on this site
       | but is was still killed. Checking this user's comment history [2]
       | it becomes clear that all his comments in the last 11 months have
       | been killed. The user has positive 'karma' so this is not the
       | cause of his comments' untimely demise. What is the mechanism
       | behind this killing spree? Is this an example of shadowbanning
       | (which this site is not supposed to employ according to Dang),
       | does someone have it out against this user and put a
       | flag/downvote bot on his account?
       | 
       | [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37571450
       | 
       | [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=NonNefarious
        
         | helf wrote:
         | [dead]
        
         | CommieBobDole wrote:
         | Looking at the profile, the user was banned by dang on
         | 2022-10-07 for "repeatedly breaking the site guidelines" in the
         | comments for the submission "JetBrains Ring UI". It looks like
         | what precipitated this was the user made a bunch of user-
         | flagged comments starting with the evergreen "why is this on
         | HN" and then arguing with the people who replied, eventually
         | calling them 'shills' and 'children', at which point dang
         | replied indicating that the account was now banned.
        
           | the_third_wave wrote:
           | Well, the account is clearly not banned given that it still
           | actively posts messages. It may be that the account is
           | _shadowbanned_ but I have been told by a reliable source -
           | Dang - that HN does not employ shadowbanning. This is why I
           | am surprised to see how anything posted by this user seems to
           | be dead on or close to arrival.
           | 
           | I can only assume that HN does indeed employ shadowbanning
           | and that my information on that front is incorrect.
        
             | CommieBobDole wrote:
             | Posts from banned users show up as 'dead', which means you
             | have to turn 'showdead' on in your settings to see them;
             | they are invisible to users who have not activated this
             | setting. Maybe there's another kind of ban that prevents
             | posting entirely, I don't know.
             | 
             | I don't think that dang claims that there is no
             | shadowbanning on HN, or at least he no longer does if he
             | has in the past; the post from him below details who gets
             | shadowbanned and who doesn't. Basically, users with a
             | posting history get the same ban as spammers, but they're
             | told that they've been banned, while spammers are not.
             | 
             | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37137747
        
         | mixmastamyk wrote:
         | It happens pretty often, a lot of accounts are penalized for
         | not being sufficiently devout to HN guidelines. You'll find
         | most of their comments are fine, even helpful. But, have a bad
         | day, an unpopular opinion, or be rude once in a while and your
         | account will be penalized, whether by automated rules or
         | targeted by moderator.
         | 
         | Another example: One day dang didn't like one of my comments
         | and my account has been saddled ever since... I can't post more
         | than three times per three hours or so. Otherwise it says "slow
         | down!" If it told me ahead of time it would be OK, but it waits
         | until I've written a lengthy post, only to lose it on submit.
         | :D :-/
        
           | helf wrote:
           | [dead]
        
           | phone8675309 wrote:
           | I get hit by this as well, so I just comment less, which is
           | probably the intended result.
        
       | plasticbugs wrote:
       | I have RGB modded my Atari 2600 with the Tim Worthington mod
       | mentioned in the article. It's one of the easier RGB mods in the
       | retro games hobby scene. If this kind of thing sparks your
       | interest, check out retrorgb.com where they've cataloged the
       | video modding options for most older game consoles.
        
         | lapetitejort wrote:
         | I recently acquired a CRT with component and S-video in and
         | went on a minor bender snatching up cables to improve video
         | quality. I've only considered 90's consoles and beyond, but I
         | may have to step backward to fill out a few older consoles. I
         | may focus on the Colecovision, which has a module that plays
         | Atari 2600 games (quite controversial at the time). There's
         | also a USB-C power adapter to replace the giant fragile power
         | brick.
        
         | MenhirMike wrote:
         | Somewhat OT, but I think that it's really unfortunate that
         | North America got a 60 Hz TV standard, but didn't get the SCART
         | Connector that makes RGB or even S-Video just natural.
         | Composite video is one of those unfortunate mistakes in
         | history, even though it might've been perfectly reasonable back
         | in the day :( And even S-Video seems like a rarity in the US.
        
           | tredre3 wrote:
           | SCART was pretty great but not perfect.
           | 
           | I lived part of the 90s in Europe and you really had to know
           | where to buy your cables if you wanted the best quality. It
           | was essentially a prequel to what we have now with USB-C. Not
           | all cables had all pins wired up, you often ended up with
           | composite quality. S-VIDEO support was very poor, you had to
           | manually select it and not all equipment would accept it. Not
           | all cables were shielded. Some equipment really hated
           | hotplugging so you had to be careful with that too.
        
             | MenhirMike wrote:
             | > Not all cables were shielded
             | 
             | Oh, yeah, that brings back unpleasant memories. Also, if
             | the SCART-end was cheaply made and you pull it out at an
             | angle, the metal part could separate from the plastic part
             | and got stuck in the socket.
             | 
             | Okay, it's not a good connector really, but it was the
             | standard way to get proper RGB in Europe, so I love it for
             | that :)
        
               | toast0 wrote:
               | Having _a_ RGB connection is pretty awesome. A better
               | connector would have been nice, but the US never really
               | got RGB for SDTV. Component video is more or less
               | equivalent, but that didn 't really appear until around
               | the time of DVDs as I recall. Lots of DVD players
               | supported it, including the PS2; but we had no mainstream
               | way to get RGB from SNES or n64. Some other sixth
               | generation systems also had component video; xbox,
               | gamecube (early models only, there was digital video out
               | and nintendo sold an encoder). Dreamcast could play most
               | games with VGA out, but that's 480p, not 240p/480i.
        
               | plasticbugs wrote:
               | Some older consoles can output RGB natively if you have
               | the correct cable: including most SNES models (not the
               | 'mini'), every Sega console, Atari Jaguar and the Neo Geo
               | home system. Interestingly, the SNES mini has the
               | cleanest video signal of any SNES model directly out of
               | the GPU but requires a mod to get RGB out of it.
        
       | Aldipower wrote:
       | I really can suggest the Atari 2600 CleanComp. It is a PCB
       | directly soldered at the pins of the TIA chip. No internal wiring
       | needed! You get composite AND s-video from it and the video
       | quality is just superb. I am not related to the Atari 2600
       | CleanComp guys. Just a happy user. :)
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-09-19 23:02 UTC)