[HN Gopher] Effectiveness of wearable activity trackers to incre...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Effectiveness of wearable activity trackers to increase physical
       activity
        
       Author : lxm
       Score  : 59 points
       Date   : 2023-09-09 16:29 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.thelancet.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.thelancet.com)
        
       | vorpalhex wrote:
       | Meta study,
       | 
       | > Taken together, the meta-analyses suggested activity trackers
       | improved physical activity (standardised mean difference [SMD]
       | 0*3-0*6), body composition (SMD 0*7-2*0), and fitness (SMD 0*3),
       | equating to approximately 1800 extra steps per day, 40 min per
       | day more walking, and reductions of approximately 1 kg in
       | bodyweight. Effects for other physiological (blood pressure,
       | cholesterol, and glycosylated haemoglobin) and psychosocial
       | (quality of life and pain) outcomes were typically small and
       | often non-significant.
       | 
       | So not nothing but a very small intervention.
        
         | tomtheelder wrote:
         | Sources suggest 3-4000 steps on average for Americans, so an
         | extra 1800 is actually a pretty big deal. 40 minutes of walking
         | is no small thing for many.
        
           | dundarious wrote:
           | AFAIK (brisk) walking 40-90mins a day is the only exercise
           | shown to increase longevity, and that in the US it is a
           | target that is routinely not met. Sounds like a really
           | substantial improvement (as long as the "brisk" target is
           | also met).
        
       | araes wrote:
       | Surprisingly positive. Personally thought activity trackers might
       | have a fairly short term interest effect, with boredom or
       | laziness after several months.
       | 
       | https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S2589-7500%2822...
       | 
       | "wearable activity trackers increased step counts on average by
       | around 1800 steps per day, walking time by approximately 40 min
       | per day, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) by
       | around 6 min per day."
       | 
       | "effects were in favourable directions (ie, negative effects
       | suggesting improvement in BMI, blood pressure, cholesterol,
       | glycosylated haemoglobin, and waist circumference and bodyweight,
       | and positive effects suggesting improvement in aerobic capacity)"
       | 
       | "strong effects on step counts at 4-6 months (increase of 1127
       | [95% CI 710-1543] steps per day), [...smaller effect on] step
       | counts up to 4 years (an increase of 494 [251-738] steps per
       | day), [...another found] small but non-significant beneficial
       | effects up to 1-2 years (BMI -0*21 kg/m2, 95% CI -1*06 to 0*65).
        
       | Ensorceled wrote:
       | > [...] equating to approximately 1800 extra steps per day, 40
       | min per day more walking, and reductions of approximately 1 kg in
       | bodyweight.
       | 
       | My morning walk is about 40 min per day and about 4km (distance
       | varies but I'm pretty reliably 6km per hour) and that works out
       | to about 4500 steps. So 1800 steps in 40 min more walking seems
       | to be a REALLY slow walk, less than 3km per hour.
        
       | mmanfrin wrote:
       | I feel this is a no-brainer and it's nice to have a meta study
       | confirm it. I won't be surprised if we start seeing health
       | insurance plans offer rebates or discounts to people who use
       | them.
        
         | codeulike wrote:
         | I was really surprised to read of the positive results. Because
         | I naturally assume that fads are just fads, based on marketing
         | or fashion, and all the activity tracking watches that appeared
         | over the last decade really seemed like a fad.
        
           | Gigachad wrote:
           | I feel like the gamification and reminders on the Apple Watch
           | are not that compelling, but having long term history
           | tracking of some stats actually is interesting.
           | 
           | A few years ago I moved out of the suburbs and in to an inner
           | city apartment. Decided to just get rid of my car and walk
           | everywhere. I made no effort to actively exercise, but just
           | went about my daily life. What surprised me is that since I
           | went car free, my average heart rate has been constantly
           | declining and my weight has as well. I don't follow any kind
           | of diet and don't really do intensive exercise (until
           | recently).
           | 
           | Just getting rid of my car and walking around massively
           | improved my health in ways my apple watch can pick up.
        
       | el_benhameen wrote:
       | Anecdata point: I was very active before I got an Apple Watch,
       | but having the watch has increased my activity in two ways.
       | First, it scratches the part of my brain that loves routines;
       | meeting a daily goal provides a dopamine hit beyond that from the
       | activity itself. Second, it provides an extra nudge on days when
       | I might otherwise have said "ah, I'm feeling
       | lazy/tired/unmotivated etc., I'm going to skip today." I didn't
       | initially think I would care about the rings, but I think they've
       | contributed to my health overall.
        
         | hombre_fatal wrote:
         | I replaced Strava (explicitly starting and ending my run) with
         | aiming for 10k+ steps per day.
         | 
         | I ended up much more active since I was incentivized to do
         | activities that would incidentally increase my steps, like
         | walking during a phone call, rather than having a rigid, more
         | stressful "I am on a run" state where I'm fixated on my pace
         | metrics.
        
           | jupp0r wrote:
           | Running is much more beneficial as you are in completely
           | different hear rate zones as a simple walk.
        
       | ls612 wrote:
       | My Apple Watch isn't perfect but it's pretty accurate in
       | measuring exercise nowadays. It was much rougher in the first
       | year or two though, they have certainly improved the hardware and
       | software.
        
       | linsomniac wrote:
       | My personal experience is just one data point, but an activity
       | tracker has been an important part over the last 4 years of
       | improving my health dramatically. 4 years ago I was sedentary,
       | and was experiencing some pretty nasty hip pain that was really
       | starting to get in the way of even my sedentary life (standing or
       | walking for an hour or two became amazingly painful for days).
       | 
       | This week, according to my watch, I have 870 "Activity Minutes",
       | I use my treadmill basically every day, and I never would have
       | imagined I would say this, but I enjoy jogging. My hip pain has
       | much more manageable.
       | 
       | Part of that is definitely the encouragement from the fitness
       | tracker. Part of it is also using the data from the fitness
       | tracker to adjust my activity and sleep. Part of it is my health
       | insurance has a gamification where I earn money for activity, and
       | also get to low key compete with others. I think it pays me
       | nearly a grand a year for activity, all told.
       | 
       | Honestly, I feel 20 years younger.
        
         | caminante wrote:
         | _> Honestly, I feel 20 years younger._
         | 
         | Sleep monitoring is big, but did you lose weight and bring your
         | BMI < 25?
         | 
         | There's no drug that can deliver the same, positive health
         | impact as going obese/overweight to "healthy" BMI. Losing
         | weight is typically not about more exercise.
        
       | barrkel wrote:
       | > _40 min per day more walking [...] psychosocial (quality of
       | life and pain) outcomes were typically small and often non-
       | significant_
       | 
       | Interesting if 40 more minutes a day walking didn't have much if
       | any effect on happiness.
        
         | noman-land wrote:
         | Based on my extremely limited understanding, you need at least
         | 90 minutes a day to see positive results.
        
           | barrkel wrote:
           | Well presumably if there's a threshold effect, +40 minutes
           | should have shown an increase because it would have pushed
           | people who were already walking over the threshold.
        
         | boringuser2 wrote:
         | The problem is the pace.
         | 
         | Walking briskly and casually walking are very different
         | activities.
        
           | coldtea wrote:
           | As if walking briskly would make people with shitty lives and
           | situational depression (like, tons, judging from statistics
           | and related depression drug usage) happy?
           | 
           | Exercize is good for endorphins and depression, but let's not
           | oversell it on inducing hapiness.
        
             | moritzwarhier wrote:
             | Walking at the sides of busy roads is very different from
             | walking around a calm neighbourhood, or even a park, a
             | forest or any other environment which is not high-density
             | urban or industrialized, polluted and ugly roads.
             | 
             | The good options are inaccessible to a large part of the
             | world's population during work week.
             | 
             | Therefore this study misses crucial factors and is an
             | excersise (pun unintended) in absurdity.
             | 
             | Still, I also see some positive effects from Apple Fitness
             | gamification even without the watch, and I'm privileged
             | enough to be able to reach a park in 15 minutes.
        
               | foxes wrote:
               | Wow it's almost like turning cities into a car filled
               | hellscape was a bad idea.
        
               | Gigachad wrote:
               | Walking in American cities is awful, but if you live in a
               | good country that limits vehicle access its super
               | relaxing to walk around the city and see all the cool
               | stuff going on.
        
       | mauvehaus wrote:
       | Got one on sale after New Years when Garmin was clearancing out
       | the old Instincts to make way for v2 of the same. My intention
       | was just to be more aware of my activity level and at least make
       | informed choices.
       | 
       | The imaginary internet points have proven remarkably effective at
       | keeping my step count up since then. I hate admitting as much,
       | but I guess in this case it's a force for good?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-09-10 23:00 UTC)