[HN Gopher] California Might Legalize Magic Mushrooms
___________________________________________________________________
California Might Legalize Magic Mushrooms
Author : mikece
Score : 15 points
Date : 2023-09-09 19:26 UTC (3 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (theintercept.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (theintercept.com)
| crawsome wrote:
| You can already get it if you are a member of certain "churches"
| in California.
| JumpCrisscross wrote:
| If we accept alcohol and tobacco, everything on this chart [1]
| that is yellow or orange should be, at a minimum, decriminalised.
| (And in my view, legal.)
|
| [1]
| https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Nutt#/media/File%3ADev...
| ternaus wrote:
| And we can criminalize tobacco and alcohol. At least tobacco.
| [deleted]
| mortureb wrote:
| I didn't realize ketamine was that high on the physical harm
| axis.
| gavinray wrote:
| It's not, the only major harm is potential kidney damage if
| you chronically abuse it.
|
| Look at folks being medically prescribed 100mg a day.
| UweSchmidt wrote:
| - we should reign in harmful drugs where possible, as was
| partially achieved with smoking
|
| - if there are _more_ drugs legalized and therefore out and
| about, people can use and abuse more different drugs and
| compound their negative effects (i.e. smoking and drinking
| often goes together). People might drink alcohol as usual, try
| mushrooms at a party and also take steroids (yellow on the
| chart) for muscles.
|
| - some drugs might have random effects and can be hard to dose
| (magic mushrooms?); single may have permanent or long term
| effects; alcohol is 'safer' in the sense that the effects are
| linear.
|
| What is your main intention here, minimize potential harm from
| drugs overall, or responsibly legalize a drug that you find
| very beneficial and intend to use?
| hmmokidk wrote:
| Why Georgia Home Boy?
| [deleted]
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-09-09 23:02 UTC)