[HN Gopher] YIMBYs Keep Winning
___________________________________________________________________
YIMBYs Keep Winning
Author : theptip
Score : 30 points
Date : 2023-09-09 17:00 UTC (6 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.slowboring.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.slowboring.com)
| CalRobert wrote:
| Interestingly yimbys are often associated with youngish urban
| lefties but the core principles are actually conservative in
| nature. Strongtowns.org discusses this a lot. Well built cities
| are more financially sustainable ones.
| fallingfrog wrote:
| [flagged]
| Georgelemental wrote:
| What is it with the obsession some progressives have with
| badmouthing potential allies? Is dunking on the outgroup
| really so much more important than accomplishing your
| political objectives?
|
| - Earnest question from me, a YIMBY conservative
| polygamous_bat wrote:
| > What is it with the obsession some progressives have with
| badmouthing potential allies?
|
| If your commitment to the cause evaporates because "a
| leftie was mean to you on the internet", what kind of
| commitment are you offering in the first place?
| Georgelemental wrote:
| I am still just as much of a YIMBY as I was 10 minutes
| ago.
| jrajav wrote:
| I disagree with the GP's predictable refrain that
| conservatism is naturally more financially 'smart', but I
| also find your characterization of conservatism a little
| bizarre.
|
| More to the point, it's ironic that both GP and yourself are
| making partisan stabs when the article's main point is that
| the success of this movement might stem from its marked
| nonpartisanship.
| 40yearoldman wrote:
| It's a circle, one day the left will find out they are on the
| right. And the right will find out they are on the left.
| 7e wrote:
| [flagged]
| ryanschaefer wrote:
| Couldn't read the whole article because of the paywall but the
| author pretty much lost me in the first paragraph...
|
| > The YIMBY movement annoys a lot of people who are highly
| engaged with politics because we are living in a time of intense
| political polarization, and YIMBYism is not aligned with either
| pole
|
| Who *wants* polarization and would be annoyed by bipartisanship??
| Wouldn't it make more sense that people find the common ground
| and unity refreshing? Just a strange phrasing of the movement.
| jjulius wrote:
| >Who _wants_ polarization and would be annoyed by
| bipartisanship?
|
| I think this[0] is the right take, but I'm guessing you haven't
| read much in the way of political discourse on Twitter, Reddit
| and Facebook over the last decade or so? Nuance has been
| discarded and there's hardly any willingness to compromise on
| anything.
|
| [0]https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37449692
| klooney wrote:
| I think you're reading him backwards- he's pro YIMBY, and
| saying that they are bipartisan and successful, but annoying to
| highly online highly partisan types.
| [deleted]
| user3939382 wrote:
| [flagged]
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-09-09 23:01 UTC)