[HN Gopher] Touch Pianist
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Touch Pianist
        
       Author : thunderbong
       Score  : 771 points
       Date   : 2023-09-08 09:56 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (touchpianist.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (touchpianist.com)
        
       | tantalor wrote:
       | On web, opening up the "choose differnet piece" window, then
       | clicking a piece does nothing.
       | 
       | Expected would close the window and load a new piece.
        
         | SkyArrow wrote:
         | Open up developer tools, choose "toggle device toolbar" in the
         | top left (or equivalent in other browsers), pick a tablet
         | device, and set orientation to landscape. This lets you
         | simulate touch events with your mouse.
        
         | havaloc wrote:
         | That works in Safari, but not Chrome for some reason.
        
         | ldjb wrote:
         | I'm using a Microsoft Surface and had the same problem when
         | trying to click using the trackpad, but tapping it on the
         | touchscreen worked.
        
       | bestest wrote:
       | I like the idea, but there's a delay. It's noticeable enough to
       | be annoying and making it impossible to play out the pieces
       | exactly as I would like to. It just feels like when I get in a
       | rhythm I end up being one tick forward. Or is it just me?
        
         | flappyeagle wrote:
         | Are you using Bluetooth headphones? AirPods have a delay that
         | makes playing rhythm games impossible
        
           | bestest wrote:
           | thank you. it was bluetooth to blame in general (was using
           | external speakers). now all delays are one.
        
             | Fnoord wrote:
             | Bluetooth codec is to blame. Some Bluetooth codecs are
             | (very) low latency.
             | 
             | I used my phone speaker. My daughter (5) loved it, thank
             | you.
             | 
             | Was odd it only worked once in Firefox Mobille (Android). I
             | had to install Vivaldi (badum-tsh) to get it to work again.
             | Was a let down it was only one song.
        
               | stavros wrote:
               | There are more songs in the menu (I think).
        
               | Fnoord wrote:
               | Nope, coming soon. Was a disappointment for my kid after
               | I told her there were more songs.
        
               | bestest wrote:
               | there are more. the menu is somewhat awkward. it wasn't
               | working for me in chrome properly (wasn't able to choose
               | other pieces). works ok in safari, had a blast with
               | toccata and fugue in d minor.
        
         | bdangubic wrote:
         | no delay at all for me
        
           | bestest wrote:
           | ok, no delay on their app, and in there the experience is
           | very satisfying. the web version seems to _feel_ somewhat
           | better when using the touchpad instead of the keyboard, but
           | still not the same.
        
             | coldtea wrote:
             | No delay on the web version to me. Probably depends on the
             | system/browser/specs/etc.
        
         | zzzeek wrote:
         | i had that problem also and as a drummer I'm pretty sure I
         | could press the spacebar with above-average steady time. I was
         | using firefox though, maybe that matters.
        
           | bestest wrote:
           | I too have musical education. using osx on m2pro, tried
           | safari / chrome / firefox -- nothing helped, the delay was
           | maddening.
           | 
           | "was" -- because indeed, blueetooth audio was the culprit.
           | was using external speakers at the time I tried it first. now
           | it's flawless and extremely enjoyable.
        
       | frud wrote:
       | That was nice.
        
       | shashanoid wrote:
       | WOW I love
        
       | igtztorrero wrote:
       | Love it ! I allways want to learn and play piano !
        
       | michael1999 wrote:
       | Lol. That's fun, and frustrating! I can't manage tempo just
       | repeating the same key on my short-travel keyboard, and if I
       | start wandering around the keyboard, my old piano lessons start
       | messing up my "fingering".
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | petarb wrote:
       | This is incredible. Thank you for sharing.
        
       | pama wrote:
       | With a lockdown-enabled iPhone I only get a loading page that
       | says chrome highly recommended.
        
       | cflyingdutchman wrote:
       | iphone app is broken for me, and according to reviews, many
       | others. I paid the $12 for full access and currently unplayable.
       | Notes don't load, song does't start - help!
        
         | Condition1952 wrote:
         | could Apple give you a refund?
        
       | Waterluvian wrote:
       | I adore this because intentional or not it shows you how critical
       | tempo and a bit of legato can be to giving the right piece the
       | right mood.
       | 
       | You have one singular job here and the way in which you do it
       | drastically affects your interpretation of Beethoven.
        
         | IAmGraydon wrote:
         | Velocity is also critical, but it's doing that for you.
        
           | gnrlst wrote:
           | I only noticed half way through you could adjust velocity
           | depending on vertical touch. Really nifty! More expressive
           | and fun than I expected. Bravo.
        
             | Timpy wrote:
             | I noticed that too! This could be a fantastic learning
             | tool, my music professor described how to crescendo into
             | the tension and decrescendo into the release but being able
             | to experiment with this tool could help you get an idea of
             | what you want to do before your fingers have the right
             | touch to do it.
        
       | keymasta wrote:
       | This was one of the first pieces I tried to learn as a kid. I
       | would just restart it repeatedly because my Casio keyboard had a
       | library of classical music on it that one could listen to by
       | hitting a function key and then a unique white key. I think it's
       | something that Casio did in the late 80s - mid 90s. They don't
       | seem to use the old song library much or at all anymore, but I
       | thought it was a great feature.
       | 
       | So I'd just restart from the beginning and learn the next note.
       | Guess-and-check. As an adult I've continually tried to learn to
       | read sheet music, with frustration. So I learned jazz theory and
       | invented my own music theory system. Now I encode most pieces
       | harmonically in my brain. It would be cool to see this kind of
       | indication in the app, so for example, the first couple lines:
       | 3/4       |C#mi|    |    |    |C#mi/B |       |     |    |
       | |A   |    |D/F#|    |G#5(b6)|C#mi/G#|G#sus|G#7 |       ...
       | 
       | I like to use this as a jam idea, for example play it like a
       | montuno.
        
       | ktpsns wrote:
       | Reminds me of https://hackertyper.com/ (and clones)
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | das_keyboard wrote:
       | It seems like the Android version is not (yet) available despite
       | it being advertised for Android.
        
         | stouset wrote:
         | I think it's the opposite. This is quite old software which
         | hasn't received App Store updates in years. It's likely the
         | Android version has been pulled from the store or otherwise
         | bit-rotted.
        
       | zengid wrote:
       | Very cool, great job! It looks like this is using PIXI for the
       | graphics?
        
       | philbarr wrote:
       | This is a great kind of thing for getting people into music.
       | There's a piano in my local pub and when people say they "can't
       | play piano" I'll play a 2-5-1 in C and tell them to hit any of
       | the white notes. People love that they can make up their own
       | tunes having never played before.
        
         | Ylpertnodi wrote:
         | The pedant in me is screaming -
         | 
         | ii V I
        
           | WWLink wrote:
           | Here I was doing barre chords on the 2nd fret, 5th fret, and
           | 1st fret on my guitar and wondering why it didn't sound good.
           | ;)
        
         | aldanor wrote:
         | And then you show them the black blues note...
        
           | kqr wrote:
           | I was miserable for most of my piano lessons (I learned to
           | sheet read well - I become a fairly adept piano-playing robot
           | - but I never sort of "figured out" music more generally.)
           | That said, one lesson my teacher played a basic blues chord
           | progression and told me to hit anything on the blues G scale
           | however I wanted. That was one of the most fun times I've had
           | making music ever. Well, the only time that has been fun,
           | actually.
        
             | jefftk wrote:
             | If you want to do this with someone who doesn't play, the
             | experienced person can play in Eb and then the black notes
             | make an Eb blues scale.
        
         | yayitswei wrote:
         | I do this too! D dorian works great as well.
        
       | ADcorpo wrote:
       | I am sorry if this is not the place to discuss it and will remove
       | my comment if needed, but seeing websites "highly recommending"
       | the use of Chrome seems like bad taste nowadays, especially with
       | what's going on with WEI.
        
         | thecosmicfrog wrote:
         | It seems to work fine on Firefox for Android. I wonder what the
         | author's concern is that he'd recommend Chrome?
        
           | ADcorpo wrote:
           | Maybe they only tested in Chrome and do not want to address
           | complaints coming from users on a different web browser, who
           | knows
           | 
           | I just get real <<this website was optimized for internet
           | explorer X>> vibes from this, I really do not want the web to
           | end up back to this state.
        
             | rockdoe wrote:
             | It's not like putting that message there will stop those
             | complaints, more like the opposite.
        
       | trialect wrote:
       | I love the way how NOONE mentions that it is not available on
       | android: "We're sorry, the requested URL was not found on this
       | server."
       | 
       | https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.earslap.to...
        
       | jacobp100 wrote:
       | No audio on the website. No audio or graphics in the app (except
       | menus). iPhone 12 mini on latest iOS 16
        
       | superpope99 wrote:
       | If you try this on Bluetooth headphones the latency will kill any
       | rubato you're trying to inject into this
        
       | junon wrote:
       | I loved this. Unfortunately the android app seems to be taken
       | down, so no La Campanella :(
        
         | andybak wrote:
         | Yeah. I spent money on it back in the day but it was never
         | updated.
        
       | shimonabi wrote:
       | Can someone suggest some good piano learning software? I really
       | don't like subscriptions.
       | 
       | Many years ago I used Voyetra Teach Me Piano Deluxe which ran on
       | Windows XP, but gave up after some time. I think I'd have to
       | create a virtual machine to run that again. My town is so small I
       | can't find a piano teacher.
        
         | Popeyes wrote:
         | https://sightreading.training/ might be useful for you.
         | 
         | This old thread go mentioned a while ago
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16482104
        
       | Condition1952 wrote:
       | It would be great if I could see the music script instead of some
       | bubbles
        
         | adzm wrote:
         | I was surprised I could recognize the song just from the
         | bubbles without even having audio enabled
        
       | ckocagil wrote:
       | Rachmaninoff's Prelude (op 3 no 2) is incredibly fun to play!
        
       | turtlebits wrote:
       | Wishlist - As a piano player, the left and right hands really
       | need to be broken up into separate rhythms (esp for grace notes),
       | also it needs a sustain pedal. Maybe as an advanced feature.
        
       | Matticus_Rex wrote:
       | Google Play app link says "We're sorry, the requested URL was not
       | found on this server."
       | 
       | Surprisingly satisfying -- I think my heart rate dropped a good
       | 10 bpm in a few minutes of playing. I'd love a little map to know
       | how far I am in the song, and some way to work pedals for
       | dynamics for more advanced users; I don't play piano, but I'm a
       | musician and am familiar enough with many of these pieces to have
       | opinions on the expression. If I could map it to custom keys that
       | would be perfect -- I happen to have flight pedals. Obviously
       | that's atypical.
        
       | johtso wrote:
       | Great choice of song! If you ever have access to a piano, I
       | highly recommended trying to fumble your way through Beethoven's
       | moonlight sonata, even if you don't know how to play piano.
       | 
       | Not quite sure how to put it into words, but it's absolutely
       | exhilarating hearing your own fingers produce these huge sounds
       | and intense chord progressions. Every time I managed to find the
       | right chord I'd get such a rush. "Oh no he didn't.. he went
       | _there_!?"
       | 
       | This webpage gives a little taste of that feeling. If you enjoyed
       | it, try to give the real thing a go!
        
         | purpleblue wrote:
         | Moonlight Sonata 3rd Movement is one of the most exhilarating
         | songs I've ever heard, if not the most. I can't believe a piece
         | of music written a few hundred years ago still sounds so modern
         | and exciting and new, it's an incredible work.
         | 
         | I urge everyone to listen to it, specifically the 3rd movement.
         | It really shocks me that Beethoven or anyone could write a
         | piece of music so brilliant like that!
        
           | jasonjayr wrote:
           | One of my favorite 'reinterpretations' of the piece is by
           | Meganeko, link here:
           | 
           | https://soundcloud.com/meganeko/beethoven-moonlight-
           | sonata-3...
        
         | anonu wrote:
         | Totally agree with this. Moonlight Sonata one of my favorite
         | pieces to play while I was growing up. I recall showing my
         | piano teacher I wanted to play it - she was classically trained
         | and taught very advanced pianists (I was not one of those) -
         | and I remember her just rolling her eyes. I kept playing it
         | anyway in my free time...
        
         | omoikane wrote:
         | Moonlight Sonata is a great choice, the arpeggios makes the
         | song quite recognizable.
         | 
         | (I don't play the piano but have learned the guitar version of
         | Moonlight Sonata, and it looks very much like this version.)
        
         | vixen99 wrote:
         | Not a bad idea for the first and maybe the second movement. The
         | third is definitely for advanced students. Nevertheless if you
         | have command of a few basic keyboard skills, learning to play a
         | passage or two from a really advanced piece can be advantageous
         | for later work though few teachers will recommend it. Let's go
         | for the ultimate but assume you're not actually taking lessons!
         | 
         | How about Ravel's Gaspard de la Nuit? Certainly one of the most
         | difficult pieces ever written. It's quite possible to work
         | productively on the first page of 'Ondine' and as with the
         | Moonlight sonata, it's exhilarating to hear yourself play that
         | exquisite tune - distilled as it were, into its essence. Plenty
         | of other possibilities such as passages from Mozart piano
         | concertos. A bonus is that one's appreciation of great artists
         | becomes much enhanced.
        
         | khazhoux wrote:
         | Moonlight Sonata is a good example of how you can be "brain-
         | limited" in learning a piece, rather than limited by technique
         | and finger dexterity.
         | 
         | Moonlight is very easy on the fingers. But the constant
         | variations are a challenge for people with poor memorization
         | and slow recall like myself. You hit an F# instead of G# on the
         | third repeat of a pattern and it's all over.
        
         | yawnxyz wrote:
         | I agree! This really gives a taste of the feeling of playing
         | moonlight for real on the piano.
         | 
         | I also realized there are some notes I might have been playing
         | wrong for many years (oops)
        
         | hammock wrote:
         | Moonlight sonata was hard for me, still is... because I only
         | ever became fluent up to three sharps and three flats key
         | signatures. And moonlight is in a key that is 4 sharps. Makes
         | it very hard to fumble through
        
           | acjohnson55 wrote:
           | For me, my brain kind of locks in to the key signature
           | eventually. It might be worth practicing scales and simple
           | chord progressions in each key to try to imprint it in your
           | brain. I found keys with lots of sharps and flats
           | intimidating for a long time, too.
        
           | tshaddox wrote:
           | That's interesting. I suppose I was lucky, because I started
           | as a kid with traditional piano lessons but lost interest
           | around age 12, but my interest in piano was rekindled when I
           | discovered the guitar and was introduced to the idea of
           | playing by ear. I got back into piano by playing along with a
           | lot of pop and rock songs, so E major has been a very
           | comfortable key signature for me since it's such a great
           | guitar key signature.
        
           | dmoy wrote:
           | Ease of playing the piece vs ease of sight reading the music
           | is different though
           | 
           | 5 flats is easier to play mechanically, imo, because hitting
           | black keys is often easier
        
             | hammock wrote:
             | True. I never found it difficult to play aside from sight
             | reading the key signature
             | 
             | A lot of classical music is this way to be honest, there is
             | a lot of formulaic composition (I don't mean that
             | derogatory at all) and once you get the patterns it's easy
             | to extend, maybe even play it like a fake book.
             | 
             | I recall a lot of what we know was originally something
             | closer to figured bass in the first place and later fully
             | arranged by someone who wasn't the original composer. Or,
             | take a look at Mozart Requiem for example, only a small
             | percent of which was actually manuscribed by the man
             | himself.
        
               | acjohnson55 wrote:
               | One thing to think about, if you're in common practice
               | music, most of the accidentals will be there for a
               | specific reason (e.g. chromatic grace notes, applied
               | dominants, harmonic or melodic minor, parallel key
               | borrowing, augmented sixth chord). Music theory classes
               | can help understand these if you're not familiar. But the
               | thing to know is whether the particular reason involves
               | raising or lowering the natural note in the scale.
               | 
               | One thing that frustrates me about music notation is that
               | when you have a key signature with lots of flats or
               | sharps, it's hard for me to tell at a glance what the
               | accidental is doing relative to the key signature. I've
               | gotta look back and remember what was the unmodified
               | note.
        
         | tuzemec wrote:
         | When I started taking piano lesions a few years ago, one of the
         | first rules that my teacher established was: "No Moonlight
         | Sonata" -\\_(tsu)_/-
         | 
         | My guess is that it resembles in a way playing "Smoke on the
         | water" in a guitar shop.
        
           | coldtea wrote:
           | Smoke on the water is great starter song - and given that
           | amateurs and new players are a large part of people buying
           | guitars, makes sense as a guitar shop song too!
        
             | krumpet wrote:
             | Agreed! And a skilled teacher would start by teaching Smoke
             | on the Water with dyads (two-note chords) and then use that
             | as a starting point for two discussions. First, one about
             | barre chords and second, one about the same chords in their
             | open format.
             | 
             | If the student is into classic rock, it's easy to expand
             | this lesson into Cat Scratch Fever, Rock You Like a
             | Hurricane, and Iron Man which are all similar to Smoke on
             | the Water.
        
           | volkk wrote:
           | that's sad. a yearning musician should be able to learn and
           | play whatever they want and whatever makes them feel a
           | certain thing. moonlight sonata evokes something in me i
           | can't explain (which is probably why it's a legendary piece).
           | having strong opinions on what to play when learning feels so
           | gatekeepy. i would have dropped that teacher quickly
        
             | partdavid wrote:
             | Actually, teachers are human beings and they're allowed to
             | have preferences, likes and dislikes. It's okay that not
             | every teacher is for every student 100% of the time.
             | Something can be a bad student/teacher fit without it being
             | a negative value judgment ("sad", "gatekeeping", "drop").
        
               | volkk wrote:
               | teachers are held to a higher standard because their
               | responsibility is a lot higher than the average citizen,
               | so while theyre fully allowed to do whatever they want
               | and have preferences -- i won't hold them to a standard
               | that i do an average person. they need to above all have
               | the highest patience and the least amount of gatekeeping,
               | full stop.
        
             | mikepurvis wrote:
             | My kids just started piano lessons last night and
             | definitely I was a little unsure to hear one of them
             | starting out with I Like Coffee ("the knuckle song"), but I
             | quickly went through this same thought process myself: it's
             | great they're off to a good start doing something that is
             | fun and exciting for them.
        
             | erikpukinskis wrote:
             | Yes, but a teacher I think has the right to decide that
             | after teaching the same song 500 times they never want to
             | hear it again.
             | 
             | I think people can be allowed one song they are tired of.
        
               | thih9 wrote:
               | I'd guess the reason would be different, I think that a
               | person that gets bothered by music repetition would not
               | work as a music teacher.
               | 
               | You might avoid moonlight sonta, but then it's 500
               | servings of fur elise.
        
               | partdavid wrote:
               | Or they've learned through their experience they simply
               | don't like the kind of person who insists on learning the
               | one song they like, and can't teach them well, so it's a
               | good filter.
               | 
               | But hey, not every teacher is for every student and vice-
               | versa; and that's okay.
        
               | volkk wrote:
               | a major rule should instead be: "choose the song you love
               | and let's learn it" -- tells me a lot more about the kind
               | of teaching they do than off the bat shooting down songs.
               | sounds obnoxious. teachers can do whatever they want ofc.
               | doesn't make them good teachers
        
               | Hadriel wrote:
               | Naw, the priority is the student not the teacher
        
           | tshaddox wrote:
           | Smoke on the Water in a guitar shop is annoying simply
           | because people playing loudly in guitar shops are annoying
           | and that's one of the most widespread stereotypes of
           | something an annoying person would play loudly at a guitar
           | shop (incidentally, I'd argue that Stairway to Heaven is the
           | more widespread stereotype).
           | 
           | A guitar instructor shouldn't criticize a beginner student
           | for wanting to learn Smoke on the Water, at least assuming
           | it's in the instructor's wheelhouse--it's also okay for a
           | particular instructor to offer a specific curriculum rather
           | than taking requests from the student.
        
           | thecosas wrote:
           | Wonderwall :-)
        
           | nathanaldensr wrote:
           | Stairway to Heaven, a la Wayne's World.
        
             | hotnfresh wrote:
             | No Stairway? Denied!
        
               | chileRick wrote:
               | There's a Highway to Hell
        
           | j7ake wrote:
           | I had a similar teacher, but it was no fur elise
        
           | ksenzee wrote:
           | I started piano lessons at age 5, I've taught piano, and I
           | still arrange music and accompany professionally from time to
           | time, so I'm a fairly snobbish classically trained pianist,
           | and it is my considered opinion that that is a lovely piece
           | of music and every pianist should play it any time they want.
           | If you teach, and you don't like the Moonlight Sonata, you
           | should hold your nose and teach it anyway.
        
           | gnulinux wrote:
           | A lot of music teachers are like that. I personally consider
           | it shitty. My friend's first violin teacher (when she was 10
           | years old) made her do empty string bowing for a year. Just
           | pull and push bowing. Now, don't get me wrong, technique is
           | extremely important, and a lot of teachers have "if you can't
           | do it well, don't do it" mentality. But really these people
           | miss music is also tons of fucking fun. For a 10 year old
           | infant, you really need a better curriculum to motivate her
           | than just perfecting empty bowing.
           | 
           | I tell people: you wanna play Rachmaninoff's Piano Concerto?
           | Go fucking play it. I mean you're not gonna play it well,
           | even some world-class pianists can't, but if it gives you
           | pleasure to try, and motivates you to play piano, that's
           | fine. If you're gonna be a professional pianist, or you're a
           | student at university, it's an entirely different matter.
           | Some people are just hobbyists, or they want to be composers
           | and learn piano to help compose (which is an extremely
           | important core skill for a composer). Those people can just
           | sit down and play whatever they want, along with things that
           | are at their level that they can perfectly play.
        
             | noahtallen wrote:
             | I give the Moonlight Sonata credit for me becoming a decent
             | pianist. It was above my level when I was a kid, but I
             | wanted to learn it, and my teacher encouraged that. With
             | enough practice on a piece that was so far above my current
             | ability, I _seriously_ leveled up as a pianist.
             | 
             | My teacher's ability to help me learn what I wanted to
             | learn made me so invested in piano as a kid. Many kids
             | don't stick with music because (IMO) they can't find a way
             | to enjoy it or be invested in it. For me, what I enjoyed
             | happened to be Beethoven, but at other times I just wanted
             | to improvise various modern songs. (Which can be as simple
             | or as complex as you want, but a lot of classically trained
             | teachers can't/won't/don't teach improvisation.)
             | 
             | Technique and theory only get you so far. Being able to
             | emotionally invest in your playing is what sets musicians
             | apart, imo. And as you're growing as a musician (even when
             | you're a kid), you're going to sound like shit if you just
             | try to monotonously follow the instructions. I'm not sure
             | enough music teachers get the importance of being
             | personally and emotionally invested in the moment as you're
             | playing. (One-buttock playing is a good word for this:
             | https://youtu.be/r9LCwI5iErE)
             | 
             | The choice of what you want to play is pretty important in
             | keeping you invested.
        
               | gnulinux wrote:
               | This hits the nail. I agree that there are tons of music
               | teachers, especially classically trained teachers who are
               | like this. They can't/won't/don't teach improvising,
               | composing, encourage you to develop your personal style,
               | ask you to bring your favorite pieces to play, teach you
               | musicianship etc... My own violin teacher taught me
               | _nothing_ other than playing Bach et al. I did pass all
               | those ABRSM violin exams, so people would call me a
               | "good" violinist but I had absolutely zero idea when it
               | comes to ear training, interval training, composing,
               | improvising, listening to music, rhythmic training,
               | notation, music theory etc. Nothing. Now as an adult, I'm
               | composing, writing my own pieces I like that other
               | musicians play, and I'm only now realizing how incredibly
               | shitty my music education was. They made me a robot. I
               | didn't learn any music, I just learned how to correctly
               | move the bow.
        
             | blowski wrote:
             | This happened to my sister. She was having fun playing
             | Disney and ABBA songs, then changed to a different teacher
             | who discouraged her from playing anything but classical.
             | She quit playing within a year and now refuses even to play
             | her favourites.
        
           | vidarh wrote:
           | My guess is that reason is that Moonlight Sonata is not
           | _hard_ to learn, just _tedious_ to teach a beginner, because
           | of the endless repetition of relatively short phrases
           | shifting and changing a little bit at a time.
           | 
           | This is what makes it fantastic, but learning to play it is
           | mostly learning a few phrases and recognizing the shifts,
           | which I can imagine would drive your teacher nuts until
           | you're at a stage where you can pick up the changes rapidly
           | enough sight reading to not have to remember every
           | transition.
           | 
           | I'd guess - as a very mediocre piano player - that it's as a
           | result low "bang for the buck" for a beginner on top of
           | annoying to your teacher.
           | 
           | Upside is once you get even just relatively mediocre at sight
           | reading it's fairly simple to work your way through yourself.
        
             | denotational wrote:
             | Whilst the first movement is fairly technically
             | straightforward, the last movement is pretty tricky and
             | requires solid technique; I certainly wouldn't characterise
             | it as "easy" even if it's not the hardest piece in the
             | repertoire.
             | 
             | If anything, the issue is that as a whole, the piece is
             | fairly technically demanding, but the first movement is
             | simply enough for most intermediate pianists to sight-read,
             | so something that seems approachable soon becomes
             | impossible for anyone below a certain level.
        
               | vidarh wrote:
               | I can buy that it's technically demanding to do the last
               | movement _well_ , in the correct tempo, but learning it
               | to a standard a relative beginner will be happy to
               | achieve was not hard for me. But that may well be another
               | distinction that makes it frustrating for a teacher to
               | try to teach to a beginner, because, yes, it will likely
               | be noticeably flawed.
        
           | krumpet wrote:
           | Nobody should work with a pompous instructor who decides what
           | is / isn't acceptable on an instrument. As a former guitar
           | teacher, I would help my students learn whatever they wanted
           | - Van Halen, Brittany Spears, Garth Brooks, whatever.
           | 
           | All music has something of merit if you're willing to look
           | for it.
        
             | ilyt wrote:
             | I mean I agree with you but I also understand not wanting
             | to do the same fucking song done badly for millionth time.
        
               | organsnyder wrote:
               | > I also understand not wanting to do the same fucking
               | song done badly for millionth time
               | 
               | My wife is a piano teacher. This describes a large part
               | of her job, especially since she focuses on beginners.
               | She'd be so happy if she could teach "Moonlight Sonata"
               | all day. "Old Macdonald" is much more common.
               | 
               | My wife does feel looked-down-upon by some in her
               | profession who see teaching advanced students as more
               | prestigious. But the process of taking a student from
               | beginner to Beethoven (not that she stops there with her
               | students) is every bit as challenging as taking a student
               | from Beethoven to Rachmaninoff.
        
               | bborud wrote:
               | I can't understand why someone would look down on people
               | teaching beginners. If you teach beginners you play
               | perhaps the most critical role in someone's development.
               | For one, it is the stage where someone is going to decide
               | if this is something they enjoy, and want to carry on
               | doing, or not. Second, you are taking someone from
               | nothing to something. That's a huge step.
        
               | Moru wrote:
               | We as a society need to step down our high horses. All
               | jobs have a purpose without which our society would not
               | be what it is today, good or bad.
        
               | matsemann wrote:
               | I remember someone many years arguing in the media that
               | we shouldn't have the best coaches for the national
               | soccer team. We should have the best coaches for our
               | kids, and in a few years that would pay off tremendously.
               | While I don't know how to do that in practice, that
               | upside-down thinking kinda struck a cord with me. We
               | should do that with more things.
        
               | krumpet wrote:
               | You're spot on.
               | 
               | My wife is a middle school mathematics teacher (and a
               | damn good one). Sooooo many former students (now high
               | schoolers) have approached her and said, "Because of you,
               | I excelled in math in high school...and I love it!"
               | 
               | She had a student last year who actually told her in a
               | very long letter, "You taught me that math matters. You
               | taught me that I MATTER."
               | 
               | The earliest teachers / coaches / mentors set the
               | foundation which is absolutely critical for all future
               | learning.
               | 
               | Want to experience the highest of highs? Become a
               | teacher. Alas, being do close to kids who are changing so
               | rapidly (and often struggling with things outside of
               | school) it also comes with some pretty deep lows.
        
               | acjohnson55 wrote:
               | I was a teacher and the enormity of the highs and lows is
               | spot on. It's not a job for the faint hearted.
        
             | vidarh wrote:
             | I think it's more it's probably not a very effective piece
             | to learn with. You can learn a few techniques from your
             | teacher and then it's just practicing the variations and
             | transitions, because it repeats roughly the same changes
             | over and over. Learning the piece during your lessons is
             | likely a waste.
        
               | sdenton4 wrote:
               | I have bad news concerning pop music.
        
               | vidarh wrote:
               | Very little pop music is as repetitive as the moonlight
               | sonata. In that respect it is more closely related to
               | trance than pop. Most pop music is also shorter, and an
               | easier mix of even shorter movements.
               | 
               | In other words, most of it will be over a lot sooner for
               | the poor, suffering teacher.
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | black_puppydog wrote:
         | Not sure that was the goal, but the text accompanying the first
         | run makes it seem like I'm supposed to get the rhythm exactly
         | in the spacing indicated on paper/screen.
         | 
         | But one thing I love about the moonlight sonata is exactly how
         | amazing one can play with the spacing of the notes. So yeah, I
         | had a lot of fun with this but I'm not sure it's the best
         | choice of piece. :P
        
           | sandgiant wrote:
           | Indeed! I think this is what makes this so fun. I can also
           | highly recommend listening to various recordings of the
           | moonlight sonata and notice how different it is depending on
           | the precise timing the pianist uses.
        
           | adrianmonk wrote:
           | What you're talking about is called playing rubato
           | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempo_rubato), and I think
           | that is part of the point here. The control that you get over
           | the timing allows you to express yourself musically / perform
           | the music with your own interpretation.
           | 
           | The instructions may be a bit unclear, but I think they are
           | suggesting that it works better artistically if you play some
           | parts evenly (the three-note sequences that repeat) and add
           | your timing variations to the other parts. This creates a
           | kind of a baseline of regularity that makes the variations
           | stand out by contrast. (It also gives the feeling that you're
           | capable of even, steady timing and the timing variations you
           | do incorporate are there on purpose.)
        
         | mccoyc wrote:
         | The first movement is one of the only pieces I can play on the
         | piano. Yes indeed, anyone can learn it! I came from a musical
         | family, but never really put the effort into learning the
         | piano.
         | 
         | I'm not sure where I heard this, but Beethoven wrote this for
         | one of his students that he was in love with. The first
         | movement was purposefully written for a newcomer to be able to
         | play--such as for whom he admired, but the third movement was a
         | representation of his anger over being rejected, and is one of
         | the hardest piano pieces to play.
        
           | electroly wrote:
           | That story is about Fur Elise, not Moonlight Sonata. The
           | name, of course, meaning "for Elise," the name of the woman
           | in question.
        
           | jimbob45 wrote:
           | The 3rd movement is not one of the hardest pieces to play.
           | It's like medium-hard. It's not even the hardest sonata -
           | that would be the Hammerklavier.
        
             | chopin wrote:
             | If one wants to play a well-known sonata I'd rather start
             | with the Tempest. Considerably easier than Moonlights 3rd.
             | And as beautiful imho, the 3rd movement especially.
        
         | globular-toast wrote:
         | I can't not cringe slightly when someone calls something like
         | Moonlight Sonata a "song".
        
           | johtso wrote:
           | Reading back my comment now, I know what you mean! I guess
           | "piece" would have been a better word, or even just "music".
        
             | globular-toast wrote:
             | Yeah, just music. I have heard people use song to mean any
             | music before, though, so it's probably something I have to
             | deal with. I do like some songs but 90% of the music I
             | listen to is comprised of either tracks/records (electronic
             | music) or pieces (classical).
        
         | PM_me_your_math wrote:
         | You're right. It is amazing.
        
       | grondilu wrote:
       | I would love to watch someone who's never heard Beethoven's
       | moonlight sonata try this.
        
       | dceddia wrote:
       | Oh man! Thank you for posting this. I saw this here on HN _years_
       | ago and loved it, and then could never find it again. Judging by
       | the YouTube videos linked from the page, it looks like 8 years
       | ago?! I got chills playing through it. Awesome to see that it 's
       | still up on the internet after all those years.
       | 
       | It's interesting to compare the comments here to the original
       | launch 8 years ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9490372
       | 
       | And the Reddit post from the same time:
       | https://old.reddit.com/r/InternetIsBeautiful/comments/34vcmz...
        
         | dang wrote:
         | Thanks! Macroexpanded:
         | 
         |  _Touch Pianist - Tap in Rhythm and Perform Your Favourite
         | Music_ - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9490372 - May
         | 2015 (100 comments)
        
         | quakeguy wrote:
         | Wow!
        
         | vermes22 wrote:
         | Clicked on the link to see the post's year and quite surprised
         | that 8 years ago was actually 2015 and not 2005 as my system 1
         | (Kahneman) memory imagined at first!!!
        
       | j7ake wrote:
       | If there was a way to adjust volume based on force that would be
       | a game changer.
        
         | pstorm wrote:
         | The higher on the screen you play, the more velocity!
        
       | saaaaaam wrote:
       | As my piano teacher used to say, "what did the piano do to you to
       | make you hit it quite so hard?" This is known as the "Moonlight"
       | sonata not the "thunder and timpani" sonata.
       | 
       | It's a great demo but the dynamic range of your piano robot is
       | horrible.
       | 
       | Oh! Can I adjust the dynamics based on where I touch? I take it
       | back! Bad workman blames his tools etc.
        
         | thruway516 wrote:
         | "Thunder and Timpani sonata" sounds like it would be a
         | fantastic piece especially if written by Beethoven
        
       | qwertymon wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
       | Hadriel wrote:
       | i cant change the music? clicking isnt working
        
         | Calamitous wrote:
         | I had to switch to Safari for the menus to work correctly.
        
       | fdgjgbdfhgb wrote:
       | Wow, this really puts in to perspective how hard the Appassionata
       | is - I could barely keep up with the tempo doing the trills with
       | one hand, I can't even imagine actually playing it. One day maybe
       | :^D
        
         | jacquesm wrote:
         | Once upon a time I realized that Bach had invented macro
         | expansion. The occasion was me trying to figure out why Partita
         | 1 doesn't sound at all the way the notes are written, and what
         | is that little wavy thing over the notes? It turns out that
         | that little ornament expands into an 8 note sequence centered
         | on the note written. Not that there weren't plenty of notes
         | already on that page...
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9etK1RuN2jc
         | 
         | 42 seconds in.
        
       | quafan wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
       | lostNFound wrote:
       | Sad to see author abandoned it. Last iOS update 8 years ago. Not
       | working in current iOS.
        
       | darkerside wrote:
       | As someone who paid many of these Beethoven sonatas growing up, I
       | love this. It's like guitar hero! You get to not worry about a
       | whole class of things and just focus on your timing and dynamics.
       | 
       | It would be really cool to be able to work voicing in, but I
       | can't think of a way short of another piano!
       | 
       | Random question, but... why is everyone in this thread referring
       | to volume as velocity?? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
        
         | sthatipamala wrote:
         | I think that's the term used for synth music
        
       | turtlebits wrote:
       | More pieces and menu "button" don't work for me on Chrome.
       | 
       | It'd be nice to see actual note lengths and rests so the user can
       | learn how to read actual notation, maybe as an alternate view.
        
       | Popeyes wrote:
       | Quite entertaining it as the volume knob on my keyboard counted
       | as an interaction.
        
       | CapsAdmin wrote:
       | I thought it was very interesting how something so simple was
       | able to make me zone in. Even though I can only control the rythm
       | and velocity, it really _felt_ as if I was playing somehow.
        
       | dddddaviddddd wrote:
       | I love that they have the Bach Partita -- I used to listed to
       | this piece on repeat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuPr9m98XQQ
       | Knowing the melody makes it a lot easier to 'play' in this app.
        
       | qwertymon wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
       | dwighttk wrote:
       | Weird lag on my iPhone...maybe Bluetooth headphones are to blame?
        
         | bestest wrote:
         | quite probably. had the same issue on osx safari desktop with
         | bluetooth speakers.
        
       | oerpli wrote:
       | If one were really great with this - would it be possible to
       | reproduce both the Richter and the Gould version of the WTC 1
       | Prelude in C Major (except maybe some flourishes)?
       | 
       | For reference, the first few minutes of these links:
       | 
       | - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1osi_pQcUdM -
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjnKuhcfB6U
        
         | verelo wrote:
         | Prelude in C is what i went to try look for before hitting the
         | upgrade screen!
         | 
         | Agreed, that piece changes so much with tempo, i was excited to
         | play with it.
        
       | Nezteb wrote:
       | I wanted to see how fast I could play the entire song:
       | 
       | const interval = setInterval(() => document.getElementById('pixi-
       | canvas').dispatchEvent(new MouseEvent("mousedown", {bubbles:
       | true})), 0);
        
         | alana314 wrote:
         | rip headphone users :D
        
         | tiborsaas wrote:
         | Thank you for this snippet, it inspired me to play to add some
         | randomish groove :)                   function play(i) {
         | document.getElementById('pixi-canvas').dispatchEvent(new
         | MouseEvent("mousedown", {bubbles: true}));             const
         | wave1 = Math.sin(i);             const wave2 = Math.sin(i * 8);
         | const mod = ((1 + wave1 * wave2 * wave2) * .5) * 350;
         | delay = 150 + mod;             i += 0.01;
         | setTimeout(() => {                 play(i);                 //
         | console.log(delay);             }, delay);         };
         | play(Math.PI);
         | 
         | Here's the wave: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/aqs7thumdm
        
       | drukqs wrote:
       | As a professional pianist that's spent the past couple of years
       | obsessing over questions of tempo, breath, phrasing, movement and
       | musicality, this app really tickles my fancy.
       | 
       | Some casual observations:
       | 
       | - As someone who has delved a little in DAWs and working with
       | MIDI, one thing that struck me is when controlling velocity with
       | on a physical, linear scale, exactly how _little_ extra velocity
       | is needed to voice a melody properly. For example, playing
       | Moonlight on my phone, I play the opening notes as quietly as
       | possible and voice the melody by playing a few bare
       | "millimetres" more to voice it.
       | 
       | - It has really forced me to know the music in a different
       | fashion, as a single, additive rhythm as opposed two hands with
       | two independent rhythms. For example, the first few bars when the
       | melody enters in Moonlight sonata: I wasn't sure if I keep the
       | fidelity of the dotted-eighth rhythms verses the triple eighths,
       | or if I turn it into essential a sextuplet.
       | 
       | - I found that some quicker figures, such as the opening of
       | Mozart's "Alla turca" are best achieved by using the actual
       | fingering I would use in the original. At a certain speed, in
       | order to achieve the rhythmic precision required, I had to use
       | piano technique.... on my phone screen.
        
       | ctenb wrote:
       | Very fun. Though nothing seems to work in Chrome except for the
       | tutorial piece.
        
         | Raed667 wrote:
         | I found it ironic that the app recommends chrome, while track
         | selection only worked in Firefox for me.
        
           | yankput wrote:
           | The site is from 2015.
        
             | rockdoe wrote:
             | There's no reason sites from 2000 would no longer work,
             | unless they use APIs that weren't properly standardized.
             | 
             | I guess that's why it recommends Chrome. Hah.
        
           | ctenb wrote:
           | Same indeed
        
       | franky47 wrote:
       | I love how tapping an irregular rhythm (eg xx-xx-x-) gives
       | Beethoven a progressive metal vibe.
        
         | tgv wrote:
         | Or hitting four keys at the same time in a waltz rhythm (so a
         | "one" that's slightly longer that two and three). I couldn't
         | make this piece sound funky, though, probably because of the
         | triplets that all move in the same direction. But try Rach's Op
         | 39, no 6. You can play it like salsa/son.
        
       | mpsprd wrote:
       | Funnily enough, I found gymnopedie #1 harder to play, even if I
       | actually already played on the piano. Its like if muscle memory
       | of actual piano was fighting it.
        
       | cloogshicer wrote:
       | Does anyone know how this does the playback in the browser?
       | 
       | Is it WebAudio?
       | 
       | I tried to reverse engineer it but couldn't figure it out.
        
         | thruway516 wrote:
         | Creator has a nice writeup here:
         | https://earslap.com/article/the-browser-sound-engine-behind-...
        
       | 0x445442 wrote:
       | Piano Hero with one thumb, I like it!
        
       | thatxliner wrote:
       | It's kind of funny how trills work in here.
        
       | julianeon wrote:
       | App idea inspired by this that I'd like to see:
       | 
       | Something like this, that has a big library of songs, where you
       | specify the delay between notes and the speed at which it is
       | played (ideally w/all notes displayed so it can be really really
       | customized).
        
       | btbuildem wrote:
       | Very pretty.
       | 
       | But. Have you tried pronouncing the name of the website out loud?
        
         | sidechaining wrote:
         | I don't get it?
        
       | magic123_ wrote:
       | Love it! It could be even more awesome if the velocity of each
       | key press had an impact of the volume, that way we could control
       | two properties at once.
        
         | dietketchup wrote:
         | Velocity is controlled by where you tap the screen (vertically)
        
           | magic123_ wrote:
           | Ah yes indeed, but I don't think it can be controlled if
           | you're using a physical keyboard. For instance if I play
           | using the keypad on my keyboard, 1 could be pianissimo and 9
           | fortissimo.
        
       | glonq wrote:
       | I installed this on my phone and have never had so much fun with
       | a 6-inch pianist.
        
       | norsurfit wrote:
       | And my mom said I'd never learn piano without practicing!
        
       | glitchc wrote:
       | Nah, it's no good. Especially with the Moonlight Sonata. Each
       | chord in a bar requires both left and right hand notes. I try to
       | press a key with each hand, but that counts as two keystrokes,
       | whereas it should only count for one. It teaches the wrong muscle
       | memory, definitely some work needed around chords.
        
         | x0n wrote:
         | You is doing it wrong. This game is not about chords, it's
         | about tempo.
        
           | glitchc wrote:
           | Unfortunately it doesn't feel like a game. It's a bit too
           | close to the real thing. The multiple dots often beg for a
           | multi-finger press. If it's really meant to be a tempo game,
           | why not show one dot, chord or otherwise?
        
       | thruway516 wrote:
       | Wow! Thankyou very much! That was beautiful. New and genuinely
       | good ideas are truly rare and I feel you've possibly discovered
       | something here. I can just imagine the possibilities if one could
       | also somehow vary the dynamics as well just with touch. Alas
       | force-touch screens are probably not coming soon to consumer
       | cellphones soon but now I can visualize a good reason for them.
       | Edit- apparently this was from 8 years ago. The app does not
       | appear to work on my modern iphone 2nd edit- it looks like I can
       | vary loudness or softness depending on where I tap on my phone,
       | at least on the website 3rd edit: Having way too much fun just
       | playing the moonlight sonata at different tempi with different
       | loud and soft passages. Tapping as fast as I can with 2 fingers
       | is a new revelation of this piece!
        
       | A_Duck wrote:
       | Beware that at least on my iPhone 14 the app doesn't work -- no
       | visuals, which makes it impossible to use properly
       | 
       | That aside, this is an amazing idea. Would happily pay for a
       | working version
        
       | SubiculumCode wrote:
       | One thing I noticed about this piece is that the one thing that
       | kills its spirit is too steady of a tempo...
       | 
       | it is actually quite amenable to an extremely loose
       | interpretation of tempo, with swings of 300% in the pace feeling
       | both natural and moving
       | 
       | ....like the tempest of the storm...sometimes racing, sometimes
       | deliberate. Try it here by listening t the mood of the music and
       | clicking faster or slower...its quite amazing.
        
       | Loodvigvanbtovn wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
       | greatNespresso wrote:
       | Love it! No tutorial needed, works on mobile, relaxing
        
       | yafbum wrote:
       | Pretty cool... the third movement of that piece would be...
       | something else!
        
       | Kaibeezy wrote:
       | Model M piano is clicky
        
         | Elias-Braun wrote:
         | Made my day : D
        
       | danpalmer wrote:
       | I'm not sure I get it. On desktop I just click to play the next
       | beat? On mobile there's no audio (in Safari or Chrome). And the
       | track selection appears to be broken?
       | 
       | Have I missed something? What's the pull here?
        
         | dceddia wrote:
         | It doesn't make sounds on my mobile Chrome either (iOS) but
         | I've noticed other sites don't either. I'm guessing there's a
         | setting somewhere that I denied once long ago and now it can't
         | play sounds :/ If anyone knows what that might be please let me
         | know!
        
           | Matticus_Rex wrote:
           | Is your phone on silent?
        
             | dceddia wrote:
             | Hahah yes, yes it was.
        
           | krumpet wrote:
           | Honestly, I don't understand what the pull is either. This is
           | just cow clicker for music. I appreciate the design and
           | interactivity, which is nice, but maybe because I'm a
           | musician, I don't understand what is fun about this.
        
             | Ylpertnodi wrote:
             | Try speeding it up and slowing it down: it's not guitar
             | hero.
             | 
             | Took me a few seconds.
             | 
             | Also, on mobile you can mega-tap.
        
         | cdfuller wrote:
         | I had to switch off silent mode on iPhone for audio to work.
         | Any chance it's the same issue for you?
        
           | danpalmer wrote:
           | Bingo! Thank you. Turning off silent mode and refreshing the
           | page fixed it.
           | 
           | That's very strange though, I wonder if it uses a weird sort
           | of web calling API or something for the audio. I've never had
           | an issue with audio in web pages before, and even the youtube
           | video the page embeds sounds fine. It seems quite poor UX (of
           | Safari? Chrome?) to require turning off silent mode - many
           | people never turn it off so it's not very discoverable, and
           | then forgetting to turn it back on again could be pretty bad.
        
             | tantalor wrote:
             | You're confused why a feature called "silent mode" would
             | make your phone not make sound?
        
               | jamie_ca wrote:
               | iOS has changed over time, such that silent mode affects
               | notification and interaction sounds but not multimedia -
               | I can still listen to music or watch videos regardless of
               | whether the phone is on silent or not.
        
               | organsnyder wrote:
               | "Silent mode" is not the same as "mute". With the former
               | you still expect to hear sound if you're using a function
               | where sound is critical.
        
             | adrianh wrote:
             | You are not alone! It's indeed very bad UX on the part of
             | Apple.
             | 
             | I run a website with music education tools and we had to
             | make a dedicated help page for this particular annoyance:
             | 
             | https://www.soundslice.com/help/en/player/troubleshooting/2
             | 3...
        
         | intrasight wrote:
         | I had audio in Safari. But it didn't start right away.
        
           | danpalmer wrote:
           | How long does it take to start? I've given it a few minutes
           | and still nothing. I'm on fast stable wifi and the audio
           | worked immediately on a desktop on the same wifi so I can't
           | imagine it's having trouble downloading the samples.
        
             | intrasight wrote:
             | Safari iOS - started in after perhaps 8 taps
        
       | grav wrote:
       | Nice idea. I'm really missing a way to contol the dynamics. Maybe
       | just mapping 1-9 keys to a velocity scaling?
        
         | gnrlst wrote:
         | On touchscreen vertical height of the touch is mapped to
         | velocity - really nifty
        
       | theoperagoer wrote:
       | This is so cool. I'm a huge classical music fan.
       | 
       | I wish you could distinguish between "right" and "left" hand
       | keypresses to control each line separately
        
         | david927 wrote:
         | yes! This was my request as well.
         | 
         | And maybe a "learn" mode where you can see the original timing
         | or the timing of a famous interpretation, like ghosts in video
         | games.
         | 
         | Love it! Thanks so much for doing this.
        
       | Ylpertnodi wrote:
       | Magic! Using velocity for accents, tapping out odd-time
       | signatures on a regular piece is so much fun! #Zappafan
        
       | bowsamic wrote:
       | I don't really get it
        
         | tomelders wrote:
         | In music, the performer can either perform the music as
         | written, or they can inject emotion into the piece by changing
         | the velocity and timing of the notes. This app lets you inject
         | the emotion through timing, even though you don't actually know
         | how to play piano.
         | 
         | It also lets you focus entirely on the "feel" of the piece.
         | 
         | I found it really fun.
        
       | kaichanvong wrote:
       | such a Great choice of song, especially since plugging round the
       | ears any headphone, earphones to help the player's enjoyment. How
       | they push it out into MIDI is beyond...
        
       | joshspankit wrote:
       | I immediately got OG iOS app vibes and wanted it on my iPad..
       | 
       | But the reviews...
       | 
       | There are _ads_ on top of in-app purchases?
       | 
       | And the fact that there are _songs_ for $0.99 (which let's be
       | honest are probably sourced from freely-available MIDI files and
       | plugged in to the already-made engine).
       | 
       | I'm going to heartbrokenly stick to the web version.
        
       | lysp wrote:
       | That was a lot of fun. I know the first movement off by heart so
       | that was fairly easy.
       | 
       | Third movement was much more fun - trying to get some of the
       | timing on that was pretty tricky. Had to alternate between 2
       | fingers and then throw in the 3rd one for some of the trills.
        
       | j7ake wrote:
       | This is like the piano version of hacker typer.
       | 
       | https://hackertyper.com/
        
       | 7thaccount wrote:
       | What's the first song? Beethoven's what symphony?
        
         | maxweylandt wrote:
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piano_Sonata_No._14_(Beethov...
        
         | hackton wrote:
         | Beethoven Sonata No. 14 "Moonlight"
        
           | philbarr wrote:
           | Let's hope it doesn't have the third movement in it or else
           | we'll be needing new keyboards.
        
             | nyanpasu64 wrote:
             | It does have the third movement. I tried it for shits and
             | giggles:
             | 
             | - Playing fast sections of a song is like mashing through a
             | cutscene, but it's easier to press quickly (not sure at a
             | consistent pace) with multiple fingers. The original piano
             | music was meant for multiple fingers as well.
             | 
             | - The hardest part is advancing the right number of
             | buttons. I don't even know the right number of notes in the
             | trills, and would kinda prefer if the website automatically
             | advanced through trills finer than a 16th note, so it's
             | less likely to end up desynced with the actual piece (I'm
             | not sure if you get used to it with learning each piece or
             | not).
             | 
             | - The website has noticeable audio latency, which makes it
             | hard to associate keypresses and which sound came out in
             | fast sections.
        
       | amiga386 wrote:
       | I tried out Rondo alla turca, and it's almost like a puzzle,
       | because it's mixing left and right hand into one stream, and if
       | you were used to doing those two separately, you're going to futz
       | it
        
       | jdjdjdjdjduuuu wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | scop wrote:
       | I love this, especially for Bach's counterpoint. To be able to go
       | through pieces I know at a speed I dictate, giving myself however
       | long I want to "hear" the chords in their relation to the
       | previous chords, is just magic.
        
       | pluc wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
       | clouddrover wrote:
       | It's quite similar to this one:
       | 
       | https://sunebear.github.io/Piano-Flow/#/pieces
        
         | totetsu wrote:
         | That one seems to be counting finger touch down and lift off as
         | a click on ios
        
         | dobladov wrote:
         | Another one similar:
         | https://artsandculture.google.com/experiment/nAEJVwNkp-FnrQ
        
       | blazebegin1 wrote:
       | [dead]
        
       | petermcneeley wrote:
       | Same energy: https://hackertyper.net/
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-09-09 23:02 UTC)