[HN Gopher] The physics of hand clapping
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The physics of hand clapping
        
       Author : RafelMri
       Score  : 71 points
       Date   : 2023-08-31 20:44 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (physicsworld.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (physicsworld.com)
        
       | nwoli wrote:
       | One of the few articles you'd write and AI stock photos wouldn't
       | be helpful
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | sublinear wrote:
       | What's with all the fake science content lately trying to claim
       | all sound is caused by sonic booms?
        
         | misnome wrote:
         | Interesting! Presumably you have a source backing up the claim
         | that the article and paper it's based on are fake?
        
           | havnagiggle wrote:
           | Try this: do a small clap. Then do a big clap. Now slap the
           | table, chair, or wall you are near. All of them are obviously
           | not sonic booms. QED.
           | 
           | You can make sonic booms with bull whips. They are quite a
           | different sound than just slapping and clapping. Check them
           | out on YouTube.
        
             | misnome wrote:
             | And a supersonic plane flying overhead doesn't sound like a
             | bull whip. Therefore supersonic planes are a lie, QED.
        
             | whatshisface wrote:
             | Just because the thing you hit continues to vibrate and
             | emit sound after it is struck, doesn't mean there wasn't a
             | small sonic boom caused by the air escaping the contact
             | surface.
        
           | saberience wrote:
           | You think a gentle clap is pushing air around at 343 meters
           | per second?
        
             | anon____ wrote:
             | Well, not _around_. The sound of a clap is travelling
             | _exactly_ with the speed of... sound. But not one bit
             | faster, of course.
        
             | misnome wrote:
             | I dunno, unlike - apparently - you, I'm not an expert on
             | the last few microseconds of the microfluidics of what
             | happens to small volumes of air suddenly evacuated from a
             | hand-sized area under constant compression.
             | 
             | I take it that this means your source for refutation is
             | "Lack of imagination"?
        
             | [deleted]
        
           | willis936 wrote:
           | For one, I can't move any part of my body at supersonic
           | speeds.
        
             | misnome wrote:
             | It's a good thing that's completely not what is being
             | claimed then.
             | 
             | I can't move any part of my body at the speed of sound, and
             | yet - somehow - I still manage to produce vibrations that
             | move at the speed of sound.
        
               | willis936 wrote:
               | It's a good thing that pushing air at the speed of sound
               | is not how you make sonic booms. You need to physically
               | move an object at a supersonic speed to make a sonic
               | boom.
               | 
               | So when you cast doubt on the claim that claps do not
               | involve sonic booms you then have the burden of proof to
               | demonstrate that a hand has supersonic motion. Please
               | provide your argument and stop wasting time with
               | pointless rhetoric.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | cloudmike wrote:
       | Finger snapping is fascinating too. I always assumed the sound
       | happens when your finger rubs quickly against your thumb. But
       | it's actually after that, when your finger strikes the fleshy
       | part of your thumb. You can verify this by blocking your finger
       | from striking your hand.
       | 
       | So it's actually more like finger clapping. The "snap" part just
       | lets you build energy for the "clap" part. Maybe obvious to some
       | but I amazingly only learned this later in life.
        
         | michelb wrote:
         | I'm curious how finger snapping started. Someone must have been
         | the first and thought it was useful. I can't remember when I
         | learned it myself, i must have been very young when i was
         | taught how to do it.
         | 
         | Edit: and then there is Beshkan, which TIL.
        
       | pluijzer wrote:
       | Still doesn't explain the sound of one hand clapping.
        
         | jojobas wrote:
         | Half-sonic boom.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | hobs wrote:
         | I didn't get this was a koan until I realized that most people
         | cant clap one handed.
        
           | jhncls wrote:
           | Well, in some countries, instead of clapping two hands,
           | people clap on tables or armchairs.
        
       | tim-fan wrote:
       | > _As two flat hands collide, the air between them is forced out
       | increasingly quickly, ultimately exceeding the speed of sound.
       | This creates an abrupt pressure change, resulting in shock waves
       | that make up a large part of the noise we hear_
       | 
       | So the clap is a mini sonic boom between your hands?
        
         | tgv wrote:
         | That sounds surprising to me, too, because I can vary the
         | loudness by moving one hand faster or slower towards the other.
         | My intuition says that a sonic boom is a "catastrophic" event,
         | so there should be a threshold. I'm wondering how they measured
         | that.
        
           | treyfitty wrote:
           | The most interesting part of this statement is that you
           | physically move both hands to clap... I let my dominant hand
           | "hit" my other hand... is that not how everyone does it lol
        
             | Sakos wrote:
             | Look around sometime. I never see everybody clapping the
             | same way. There are tons of variations, including what you
             | do, and plenty of people use them.
        
             | magicalhippo wrote:
             | I mostly move both, but vary a bit depending on intensity
             | and frequency. It's faster to clap against, but I get more
             | sound moving both. It also spreads the effort, so I prefer
             | it for low intensity clapping.
        
             | adhesive_wombat wrote:
             | I think you'll be ok, considering at least one person does
             | this: https://twitter.com/MetroUK/status/748854767938473984
        
         | dmbche wrote:
         | The sonic boom comes from the object going faster than its own
         | soundwave and crossing it, this just seems to be the product of
         | a big pressure differential between the clap and ambiant air
        
         | saberience wrote:
         | I do not believe there is a literal "sonic boom" when clapping.
         | It's possible to cap very slowly and still make a small noise
         | and I don't believe my slow-clapping is pushing air around at
         | 343 meters per second.
        
           | whatshisface wrote:
           | Why not? The size of the channel it has to move through goes
           | to zero as your hands meet, but the volume reduction per
           | second is roughly constant. That means the velocity goes to
           | "infinity."
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-09-02 23:01 UTC)