[HN Gopher] LIBS confirms the presence of sulphur on the lunar s...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       LIBS confirms the presence of sulphur on the lunar surface
        
       Author : merrier
       Score  : 30 points
       Date   : 2023-08-31 20:00 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.isro.gov.in)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.isro.gov.in)
        
       | 0xDEF wrote:
       | It also found a a remarkable temperature gradient on the South
       | Pole's surface. Even if the surface temperature is 60+ degree
       | Celsius just 8 cm below the surface the temperature is -10 degree
       | Celsius. (South Pole) Moon dust is a really good insulator.
        
         | Jeff_Brown wrote:
         | That (60 C) is far hotter than I would have guessed. I realize
         | the moon doesn't have an atmosphere, but at the south pole the
         | light should be tangent to the surface. Is the probe not
         | actually at -90 degrees latitude, and was this measurement
         | taken at noon?
        
           | bguebert wrote:
           | The moon has a tilt so the amount of light at the poles can
           | vary over time.
        
           | zardo wrote:
           | It's 60 C colder than noon temps at the equator
        
       | morbidious wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
         | dang wrote:
         | " _Please don 't pick the most provocative thing in an article
         | or post to complain about in the thread. Find something
         | interesting to respond to instead._"
         | 
         | " _Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents._ "
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
         | 
         | We detached this subthread from
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37338000.
        
           | morbidious wrote:
           | Happy to see the proactive moderation.
           | 
           | Update: Didn't see your comment on the original post.
        
         | fsloth wrote:
         | Objectively speaking if they left years ago there is chance
         | they are describing the actual availability of toilets as this
         | was really low in some states (some states with under 20%
         | having access to toilets)
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_states_ranking_by_ava...
         | 
         | Afaik dealing with the shit was left to dalits, leading to
         | their outcast status. So if one was a dalit in low-toilet-
         | availability areas then 'shithole' is actually a really
         | accurate depiction of their objective experience and not a
         | derigatory expression.
        
           | morbidious wrote:
           | If what you say is true, it was the colonizers who left us in
           | such a state.
           | 
           | Glad those barbarians left us.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | amriksohata wrote:
       | What is the significance of each element being found?
        
         | photochemsyn wrote:
         | The main issue is detection of water, which would show up as
         | hydrogen in the elemental analysis. Failure to detect hydrogen
         | is probably the most significant result at present:
         | 
         | https://www.space.com/chandrayaan-3-moon-south-pole-why-nasa...
        
         | mhb wrote:
         | It might be possible to gather them and build a crude weapon to
         | defeat the Gorn.
        
         | unnouinceput wrote:
         | Less resources to be shipped from Earth for future
         | habitats/missions that require a lunar base.
        
       | haltingproblem wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
         | dang wrote:
         | We detached this flamewar subthread from
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37338000.
         | 
         | Please don't take HN threads into political, nationalistic, or
         | ideological flamewar, or any other flamewar. We ban accounts
         | that keep doing this, and we've had to ask you more than once
         | before, so please stop.
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
        
           | haltingproblem wrote:
           | I thought we were having a perfectly reasonable discussion on
           | India's development trajectory and misses, if you read down-
           | thread.
           | 
           | But this is your sub so I will stay away from comments on
           | this sub.
        
         | vaidhy wrote:
         | I do not think that is what the author intended - "You want
         | your home country to do well but at the same time you are
         | hyperaware of its numerous deficiencies."
         | 
         | I am aware of the deficiencies, but also very aware of the
         | progress being made. There is no magic wand to wave to make
         | people not be like people and change a vast, diverse population
         | into something they are not.
        
           | haltingproblem wrote:
           | So what you are saying is that the numerous deficiencies are
           | *intrinsic* to India (and Indians) by extension and will
           | never go away? Is is about their DNA (nature) or their
           | culture (nurture)?
           | 
           | What is about _" a vast, diverse population into something
           | they are not"_? Are you saying India can not be a middle-ish
           | income country like China/Thailand/Malyasia etc. I would like
           | to believe that wise choices by the electorate and good
           | leaders and some luck can transform the country (or any
           | country). Japan/South Korea/Thailand/Malaysia all did it.
           | Some of those countries are vast, some diverse and some had
           | less advantages than India.
           | 
           | If you believe in the opposite that then are you not giving
           | into the ideas in the "Clash of Civilizations" or worse
           | "Genetics as IQ" crowd?
        
             | innagadadavida wrote:
             | I'd like to look at some data on people movements before
             | making up hypotheses and theories. What we have seen is
             | that more people are moving out of India than into the
             | country (other than some poor migrants from places like
             | Bangladesh). What do you think that this data is telling -
             | not about the people (it is easy to blame them for not
             | being patriotic etc). but about the judgements these people
             | have made of the situation? In my opinion, people prefer
             | comfort and lesser competition over grinding it out and
             | this is a universal preference. Denying this basic fact
             | will not help you come up with solutions to the problem -
             | just wishing "if all the people would choose to stay and
             | grind it out, then the country will have more progress" is
             | not a viable solution.
        
               | haltingproblem wrote:
               | People migrate. Especially when they are better
               | opportunities. The founder of FB "migrated" to Singapore
               | from the US. So did the Dyson guy from the UK and he then
               | moved back.
               | 
               | Using net migration as a statistic for the health of a
               | country is no more (or less) valid than the TFR or
               | longevity or anything else equally plausible.
               | 
               | Q: Say that Sundar Pichai or Vinod Khosla had not left
               | India? Would their impact on India larger or smaller?
               | 
               | I would say India is better off that they left, maybe you
               | differ?
        
               | nxten wrote:
               | Germany has the brain drain problem too, what does that
               | tell you? People are greedy. period.
        
             | vaidhy wrote:
             | No.. I am saying deficiencies are intrinsic to humans.
             | India has made some choices between being a socialist,
             | democratic country and it comes with its own pros and cons.
             | 
             | India has a very vibrant local economy which does not show
             | up in nominal GDP. By GDP by PPP, India is the third
             | largest economy in the world (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
             | /List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)). I consider India to be a
             | solid middle income country, not any less that other
             | countries you are talking about.
             | 
             | I am actually fairly proud of the changes I see in India in
             | the last 20 years. I Some of the key changes I have seen
             | (by no means complete): 1. Improvement in road transport
             | with a nationwide single toll provider. 2. Indian railways
             | has always been there as an affordable means of transport.
             | 3. Getting a passport is now a couple of days and less than
             | 24 hours with tatkal. 4. Healthcare is free for all. Yes,
             | it varies from state to state, but government hospitals are
             | available for everyone. Even otherwise, it is affordable.
             | 5. Air travel went from just for the rich to middle class.
             | 6. Government and publicly funded schools are reasonably
             | good (The project director for Chandrayaan 3 came from a
             | government school).
             | 
             | And yes, I am also very aware of the issues - political
             | class abuses the power to enrich themselves. Different
             | states have different development indices. But perfection
             | is not needed for improvements.
        
               | haltingproblem wrote:
               | Ah, you are not saying what I thought you were saying,
               | actually the opposite.
               | 
               | Thank you for the clarification
        
             | denton-scratch wrote:
             | > Is is about their DNA (nature) or their culture
             | (nurture)?
             | 
             | It's always about culture.
             | 
             | The British Empire employed a strategy of divide-and-rule:
             | it encouraged and amplified the caste system, and also
             | encouraged the partitioning of society along religious
             | lines. On top of that, it layered the English class system,
             | and a horribly-botched partition.
             | 
             | I don't mean to imply that Indians don't have agency;
             | they've had 80 years to fix the mess the Empire left them
             | with, but things are getting worse (IMO).
             | 
             | I don't like empires. I look forward to the breakup of
             | Great Britain. I think the USA is struggling to hold itself
             | together. Most complaints about China are about the
             | imperial domination of ethnically-distinct regions by the
             | Han. The current war in Europe is a war of imperial
             | conquest. I wonder whether India might be too big and
             | diverse to manage, too?
        
               | lacy_tinpot wrote:
               | Things are getting worse? On what metric?
        
               | denton-scratch wrote:
               | Authoritarianism, wealth distribution, land distribution,
               | belligerent nationalism, caste and religious intolerance.
               | Take your pick.
               | 
               | 80 years isn't a long time, and over many years I expect
               | it will be sorted out.
               | 
               | /me not been to India for 40 years, opinions based mostly
               | on mainstream news
        
         | harrymit907 wrote:
         | Just to be clear, Modi and his shithole party had nothing to do
         | with the success of Chandrayan. 100% credit goes to the
         | scientists and engineers.
        
           | morbidious wrote:
           | Not taking anything away from the scientists and engineers,
           | it is their achievement completely.
           | 
           | But is this the way to talk about the party that has the
           | support of 80% of Indians? Hate to see such uncultured
           | speech.
           | 
           | @dang please flag parent comment.
        
       | dxbydt wrote:
       | There's a flurry on new info. In particular the variance of
       | surface temperature at the lunar south pole, from 60 degree
       | Celsius on the lunar surface, to -10 degree Celsius if you probe
       | just 8cm below the surface
       | 
       | https://nitter.net/pic/orig/media%2FF4hsyEQaEAAB-AS.png
       | 
       | A whole seventy degree temperature difference over such a small
       | height delta. There were a bunch of scientists trying to explain
       | this on Indian news TV & it was quite amazing.
       | 
       | I'm actually very happy in ages! As an immigrant there is this
       | bittersweet relationship with the home country. You want your
       | home country to do well but at the same time you are hyperaware
       | of its numerous deficiencies. I haven't been back to India in a
       | few decades now. But so much science! And presented in such down
       | to earth language. Its really like watching some of the old
       | Apollo footage where you can actually understand the scientist.
       | He's using simple graphs & charts & simple math to make his
       | point, instead of drowning you in technojargon.
       | 
       | Their project scientist is a very ordinary guy with extremely
       | average test scores, for an Indian aspirant. But this chap
       | persisted & pursued his education throughout his adulthood,
       | finally earning his PhD in aeronautics. He comes from a shithole
       | village that is about 50km from my shithole village. I mean,
       | growing up we didn't have fucking electricity until my teens. No
       | proper drinking water. No phone no TV no nothing. Now he gets to
       | put a rover on the moon! I had tears in my eyes at the end of his
       | TV interview.
       | 
       | https://urlis.net/npi7rk3q
        
         | AtlasBarfed wrote:
         | Totally tangential: Did you see the Indian 4x400m relay team
         | made the world finals, but in qualifying, dared to try to pass
         | the US team on the final leg? India has never had a
         | particularly good track and field team, but allegedly they are
         | encouraging running and fitness more there.
         | 
         | For those that don't know, the US 4x400m relay team in track
         | and field is about the most dominant thing ever. If they don't
         | drop the stick, it is assumed they are going to win. Even the
         | qualifier team virtually always wins the heats. So an unknown
         | like India having the temerity to try to take the lead against
         | the US team is a huge shot across the bow.
         | 
         | It seemed significant for other reasons. First, based on very
         | light googling and looking at names, the team was of mixed
         | religion with two Muslims (two guys with Muhammed first names)
         | and two Hindi-seeming names. They seemed to genuinely like each
         | other and support each other. That might have progressive steps
         | for the long standing religious conflicts in India, that a
         | mixed religion team came together for a historic moment in
         | Indian athletics.
         | 
         | Second, track might be a very interesting sport for "echoes of
         | caste system" India (there was just a Caste news on HN a day
         | ago so it's still obviously somewhat important). Unlike any
         | team sport with selection, in track, if you are faster, well
         | .... you're faster. Doesn't matter the race / religion / caste
         | / connections, if you can run a 50 second 400m and the other
         | guy runs a 53, it is VERY apparent who wins or should be
         | selected for a team. Track and fitness in general is a kind of
         | class-smasher in that regard, and could be a harbinger of big
         | (positive) social change.
         | 
         | But maybe I'm reading a bit too much into a small sample.
         | 
         | Also, an Indian won the Javelin throw, beat a Pakistani who got
         | silver, and there were two other Indians in the top six.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | jamal-kumar wrote:
         | Honestly super happy for India for pulling this off. People
         | don't seem to acknowledge the amount of science that's been
         | coming out of India for a long time now and I hope this
         | enlightens people a little on the fact that the country has a
         | lot of strong intellect to share with the world.
        
           | junon wrote:
           | Seconded. India has some terrific development culture.
        
         | penguin_booze wrote:
         | On that graph: isn't it conventional for the independent
         | variable (in this case, depth) to be on the x-axis?
        
           | perihelions wrote:
           | But "depth" is literally the down direction, so I think it's
           | also acceptable to do this y/x thing. I've seen this choice
           | in other places too,
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Standard_Atmosphere#/medi.
           | ..
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_of_Titan#/media/File:T.
           | ..
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermocline#/media/File:Thermo.
           | ..
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | dxbydt wrote:
           | https://www.dataanalytics.org.uk/reversing-the-axis-of-an-
           | ex...
           | 
           | "sometimes you want to make a plot that reflects the real
           | situation rather than a plain mathematical one"
        
         | saiya-jin wrote:
         | Cannot this gradient be used for some sort of heat pump? Or is
         | it more effective to just outright collect the photons with
         | solar panels.
        
           | marcosdumay wrote:
           | The gradient is there for the exact same reason that you your
           | pump won't reach a lot of material and will just create a hot
           | mini-island near you heat exchanger.
        
         | __rito__ wrote:
         | What does this point to- https://urlis.net/npi7rk3q?
         | 
         | Can't access it. Could you please share the original link or a
         | link that works?
        
           | dxbydt wrote:
           | looks like HN hug-of-death, sorry about that.
           | 
           | https://www.indiatoday.in/science/chandrayaan-3/story/chandr.
           | ..
           | 
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMbpU_viwvA
           | 
           | https://www.latestly.com/agency-news/india-news-vikram-
           | lande...
           | 
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrr1-XrCoDU
        
         | V1ndaar wrote:
         | Thank you for sharing your perspective. It's nice to read
         | something positive once in a while! :)
        
         | dang wrote:
         | Please edit provocations and swipes out of your comments here.
         | The provocation "shithole" led to a bunch of flamewar that I'm
         | certain you didn't intend, and yet your comment is responsible
         | for starting it. (I've detached those subthreads as offtopic
         | and collapsed them, but they can be found at the bottom of the
         | page.)
         | 
         | The site guidelines specifically include rules to prevent this
         | kind of thing, so it would be good to review them:
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
         | 
         | Your comment was otherwise fine, so I'm going to downweight
         | this reply to the bottom of the subthread.
         | 
         | (Oh, but also please don't use link shorteners on HN.)
        
           | ye-olde-sysrq wrote:
           | I felt like it was okay-ish given he immediately qualified
           | his own, nearby hometown with the same descriptor. I think it
           | changed the effect from discriminatory to almost a term of
           | chagrined endearment which lent weight to his subsequent
           | commentary.
           | 
           | Would I have written it myself? Probably not, especially
           | given who recently popularized the term "shithole". But I
           | think as a rhetorical device it did what he wanted it to in
           | his writing.
        
             | dang wrote:
             | I agree with you of course but the problem is that such
             | subtleties don't survive the statistics of a large forum.
             | Even if 95% of readers get it, the 5% who don't are a
             | large-enough subset to derail the thread. Even if 95% of
             | the 5% who don't-get-it are willing to let it go and move
             | on, that leaves 0.25% of readers triggered--more than
             | enough to turn any thread into a flamewar.
             | 
             | It's similar to this dynamic that comes up fairly often:
             | User: $group is so $pejorative       Mod:  Please don't
             | post slurs to HN       User: But I'm a $group
             | 
             | It's perfectly legit conversation in a smaller, more
             | cohesive context (e.g. friends over drinks), but that's
             | precisely what a large forum like HN is not. That's why we
             | have to moderate comments by effect, not intent [1], and
             | that's why the burden is on commenters to disambiguate
             | their intent [2].
             | 
             | [1] https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=tru
             | e&sor...
             | 
             | [2] https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=tru
             | e&que...
        
       | kaycebasques wrote:
       | Not a space exploration expert. It seems like the presence of
       | sulfur on the Moon has been known for a long time [1] but perhaps
       | it's newsworthy that sulfur is more abundant in some regions
       | (like the south pole) than previously thought. [1] says that
       | sulfur has broad applications, most importantly the ability to be
       | a substitute for water in mechanical and chemical processes.
       | 
       | [1] https://space.nss.org/wp-content/uploads/Lunar-Bases-
       | confere...
        
       | pavel_lishin wrote:
       | > _ISRO announced the rover's LIBS results definitively confirm
       | the presence of sulfur at the landing site. Additionally,
       | preliminary scans detect traces of aluminum, iron, calcium,
       | chromium, titanium, manganese, silicon, and oxygen in the soil.
       | Further hydrogen detection efforts are underway._
       | 
       | What about hydrogen? No hydrogen means no water where they're
       | currently landed, right?
        
         | Tuna-Fish wrote:
         | The reason people think there will be water is that when water
         | evaporates on the moon, it won't be instantly lost. Instead, it
         | will bounce around for a while before it is (probabilistically)
         | lost. If/when it hits a surface that's below freezing point in
         | vacuum (~200K), it can instead freeze and stick to that
         | surface.
         | 
         | There are believed to be such surfaces in permanently shadowed
         | craters on the poles of the moon. They won't find any in any
         | place where the rover can charge, but they might do short trips
         | into shadowed spots, I don't know.
        
         | dexwiz wrote:
         | Probably elemental hydrogen.
        
         | zardo wrote:
         | They certainly won't find water on a 60C surface.
        
           | fooker wrote:
           | Why not?
           | 
           | Plenty of 60C water on the earth's surface.
        
             | Zardoz84 wrote:
             | but not in the vacuum. At 60C on the moon, the water is
             | just gas and would leave the moon a long time ago.
        
             | Ajedi32 wrote:
             | The moon doesn't have an atmosphere. https://en.wikipedia.o
             | rg/wiki/Phase_diagram#/media/File:Phas...
        
               | fooker wrote:
               | Ah nice, missed that thanks.
        
             | Matticus_Rex wrote:
             | Is there? Hottest surface temp recorded on earth was 56.7C,
             | no? And Death Valley isn't known for the presence of water
             | (when it's anywhere close to that hot).
        
               | meepmorp wrote:
               | Hot springs in volcanically active areas?
        
               | mattashii wrote:
               | > Hottest surface temp recorded on earth was 56.7C, no?
               | 
               | Hottest air temperature at just above surface level;
               | excluding several localized extremes like measurements
               | around vulcanos or asphalt roads.
               | 
               | Asphalt surfaces can easily reach 60+degC on days with
               | direct sunlight and little to no wind, and vulcanos
               | supply new surface all the time with temperatures far
               | north of 100degC.
        
       | denton-scratch wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
         | dang wrote:
         | Please don't do this here.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-08-31 23:01 UTC)