[HN Gopher] Hundreds of thousands trafficked to work as online s...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Hundreds of thousands trafficked to work as online scammers in SE
       Asia, says UN
        
       Author : layer8
       Score  : 328 points
       Date   : 2023-08-30 12:27 UTC (10 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.ohchr.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.ohchr.org)
        
       | 1-6 wrote:
       | Unsure if it's related to the same region but in general,
       | scammers are getting sophisticated with their attacks finding
       | local churches and email phishing with unusually detailed
       | information about church members. Posting videos asking prayers
       | for specific individuals online is a bad practice since it
       | exposes not only that individual but everyone around them to
       | scam.
        
       | vishnugupta wrote:
       | Related; 130 trafficked Indian workers were rescued last year.
       | 
       | https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/10/8/indian-workers-resc...
        
       | skilled wrote:
       | Related (as in a similar story but focusing specifically on
       | Cambodia),
       | 
       | They're Forced to Run Online Scams. Their Captors Are Untouchable
       | (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37304188) (no comments)
        
       | momirlan wrote:
       | i remember an article about people from Moldova trafficked to
       | Turkey, where they promptly had one or two organs harvested and
       | then sent back home. the horror...
        
       | macawfish wrote:
       | This is an extreme and poignant caricature of the labor market in
       | general as vast numbers of people experience it. Not to minimize
       | what's happening here: extreme financial pressure with very high
       | stakes is not rare. It's disturbing to see the extremes because
       | there's no hard line between normal labor and this, it's really a
       | continuum.
       | 
       | Aside from enforcement and regulation, what really prevents these
       | exploitative forms of labor from spreading?
        
       | kirillzubovsky wrote:
       | Hi, this is UPS. Your packages was the wherehouse due to an error
       | in the shipping address. Please contact our customer service
       | immediately at http://scams4you.xyz
        
       | ConfusedDog wrote:
       | Just saw a documentary interviewing escaped trafficked labors -
       | just men, women ain't even capable of escape. They are falsely
       | promised for "entrepreneurial opportunities," promptly got locked
       | up and financially deprived to do scamming, prostitution, etc.
       | One guy escaped, bystanders took him to the police and the police
       | was part of the traffiking ring and sold him back. He finally
       | paid off somebody with promise of ransom payment from his
       | relatives, and upon entering Chinese border, he was fined by
       | Chinese border control for violations. These local traffik orgs
       | are armed with AKs and well connected politically. What a crazy,
       | crazy world.
        
         | adhesive_wombat wrote:
         | > They are falsely promised for "entrepreneurial opportunities"
         | 
         | From what I heard, which I cannot verify, it's more sinister
         | then that. People take completely normal-sounding jobs in
         | normal-looking and functioning offices. After several months of
         | being paid normally for normal work, they're invited to a team-
         | building event in SE Asia. There, they lose their passports,
         | are interned in huge camps and are press-ganged into being
         | scammers, and tortured or killed if they refuse.
         | 
         | This isn't your usual "can't cheat an honest man" tale where
         | you sucker in greedy rubes with a promised free lunch.
        
           | brucethemoose2 wrote:
           | The entire chain that enables this is disturbing, but
           | fascinating.
           | 
           | For instance, the scammers would need some kind of
           | credibility in the job market before the team-building
           | exercise. Do they just start up new legtimate businesses with
           | new people just for this purpose?
           | 
           | And the SE Asia slave camps need a huge amount of compliance
           | from the locals.
           | 
           | And what happens when none of the employees return from the
           | original country?
        
             | costco wrote:
             | > And the SE Asia slave camps need a huge amount of
             | compliance from the locals.
             | 
             | Myanmar is home to like 20 different civil wars. Some of
             | these conflicts ended in ceasefires. The areas that got
             | good ceasefire deals (Wa, Mongla, some "border guard
             | forces" who the military lets do whatever they want in
             | return for allegiance) generally have a high degree
             | autonomy from the Burmese government. So these areas are
             | essentially run by warlords who are accountable to no one
             | because the Burmese government cannot enter these areas.
             | China backs some rebel groups and occasionally puts
             | pressure on them to stop various crimes but they quickly
             | adapt (when China cut internet to Mongla they just started
             | using satellite). These areas are home to the largest meth
             | labs in the world, illegal logging, illegal mining, etc. So
             | they are perfect for criminals as they just have to pay
             | "taxes" to whoever is in power. I read a good book on this:
             | https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/62141000-stalemate
             | 
             | Some scams are in Cambodia and Laos. The survival of these
             | mostly has to do with corrupt law enforcement. All of the
             | scam victims are either Chinese or in the West so they have
             | even less reason to care.
             | 
             | > For instance, the scammers would need some kind of
             | credibility in the job market before the team-building
             | exercise. Do they just start up new legtimate businesses
             | with new people just for this purpose?
             | 
             | I think it goes something like this: You make $200 a month
             | as a dishwasher in Cambodia. A friend of friend messages
             | you and tells you that you can make $800 a month. Because
             | you are hopeful and want to improve your life you do not
             | thoroughly vet them.
             | 
             | > And what happens when none of the employees return from
             | the original country?
             | 
             | If they are from the region there's usually no record
             | because they are picked up by an "agent" and go through a
             | series of illegal border crossings.
             | 
             | There are people who actually knowingly apply for these
             | jobs too: https://vodenglish.news/underground-group-chat-
             | teems-with-hu...
        
             | harpiaharpyja wrote:
             | This seems like an important point. Either this element is
             | being exaggerated, or some aspect of their society itself
             | is enabling this at a fairly deep level.
        
             | nradov wrote:
             | People who need a job apply to new start-up companies all
             | the time. The scammers can just start a new company every
             | few months. All they need a rented office.
        
           | whimsicalism wrote:
           | I don't believe you, to be honest. Provide a source or delete
           | if you can't substantiate.
        
             | lcnPylGDnU4H9OF wrote:
             | For what it's worth, they would be unable to delete the
             | comment both because it has replies and because it is past
             | a certain age. The comment can't otherwise be edited to
             | have its text removed because it is past a certain age.
        
           | ConfusedDog wrote:
           | Yeah, I saw that, too. If they refuse, they claimed that they
           | are going to be "harvested" of cornea, plasma, kidney, etc.
           | What I don't understand is that they said they were
           | threatened to be taken to international water for organ
           | harvesting procedures, but was that even necessary? Those
           | camps are pretty criminal already, seems to be an unnecessary
           | extra step.
        
             | derefr wrote:
             | My understanding -- which mostly comes from reading about
             | the "scam centers" operating in the Laos "golden triangle"
             | autonomous region specifically -- is that everything
             | happening there is either "legal" or "unprosecutable" due
             | to jurisdictional problems. If a Chinese-owned-and-operated
             | company has a bunch of illegal immigrants from Myanmar and
             | Thailand and Cambodia (but no Laotians!) locked up in a
             | "scam center" in a Laotian AR... then which police force
             | has both the motivation and the right to come knocking,
             | _without_ that being an international incident and
             | potential incitement to another territorial war in the
             | region that nobody wants?
             | 
             | Laotian police have been quoted as saying that they have
             | full authority to come into the autonomous region to
             | investigate a crime, given irrefutable evidence of a crime
             | -- but that they can't come in _without_ such evidence; and
             | that it 's very hard for them to get such evidence.
             | 
             | I'm guessing that by "crime", here, they probably mean "a
             | felony" (or whatever the Laotian equivalent is) -- which is
             | likely the blocker for them, and probably the basis for the
             | very thin line that these criminal gangs are treading.
             | 
             | I believe that "an escapee who can show that their organs
             | had been harvested" would be irrefutable evidence, enough
             | for a police raid; while "an escapee who told a story about
             | being held captive for years" would not.
             | 
             | (And re: the other part, of some of the things happening
             | there being "legal" -- a large part of how these companies
             | work is by indentured servitude, in the literal sense: they
             | get people coming there to sign contracts for provision of
             | services and equipment, that create a debt owed by the
             | worker to the service/equipment-provider; and then they
             | don't let them leave until they work it off. These
             | contracts seem to have a lot of power for the gangs; they
             | don't bother to chase escapees who haven't signed them,
             | while considering people who _have_ signed them to be
             | "theirs to keep." Presumably, they've tested these
             | contracts with local law-in-practice, and found that they
             | actually work as a shield for what they're doing.)
        
             | adhesive_wombat wrote:
             | That sounds very much like the plot of _Animal World_!
             | 
             | To be honest, it doesn't all add up for me as simply
             | described: offices where multiple people suddenly vanish
             | seem unlikely to escape notice back home, unless they're
             | excellent at picking people without any support network to
             | report them missing. But maybe there's more to it than the
             | simple description. And there is an enormous supply of
             | migrant workers in cities without friends or families to
             | come looking until it's to late, so I suppose it _could_
             | happen. Or maybe it 's garbled in the transmission and the
             | jobs are all actually out of the country, but they don't
             | spring the trap instantly when you walk in
             | 
             | But at least it seems not to be simply little scammers
             | tricked by bigger, eviller ones, but rather they really
             | have people who were genuinely looking for at least fairly
             | honest work being ensnared.
        
               | jstarfish wrote:
               | From other accounts, people back home are generally too
               | _poor_ to come looking.
               | 
               | These people have to smuggle themselves out of their own
               | country, then maintain a presence illegally abroad,
               | _then_ run an amateur investigation. It just doesn 't
               | work out like that.
        
               | WeylandYutani wrote:
               | I live in a rich European country and every once in a
               | while they find some poor smucks forced to pick asparagus
               | at a farm or have sex with a dozen men a day in a hotel.
               | It gets a little column in a newspaper.
               | 
               | It's really not that hard to make people drop off the
               | grid in an uncaring world.
        
             | whimsicalism wrote:
             | I am sure that there are terrible human rights abuses as
             | outlined in the parent article, but I think it is also true
             | that the media loves to jump on stories like these and
             | exaggerates things.
             | 
             | See for instance CNN reporting that Kim Jong Un had his
             | uncle torn apart by a pack of dogs. Generally once organ
             | harvesting starts coming in to play, one should put on a
             | very skeptical hat, while there is evidence that this has
             | happened among some prisoners in China, I think one should
             | remain skeptical on first-read of such claims.
        
           | hef19898 wrote:
           | Sounds like an industry ripe for disruption, AI, LLMs and AI
           | voice generators to the rescue! /s
           | 
           | In all honesty, if AI is killing those organisations, that
           | might be the only half way decent thing coming of the current
           | AI use cases.
        
           | l33t7332273 wrote:
           | I don't believe this happens with any degree of regularity;
           | it's like the plot of a movie.
           | 
           | If it happened even once, it would be noteworthy. Do you have
           | any reference to an article about it?
        
             | rhaway84773 wrote:
             | Ever heard of the World of Faith Fellowship?
             | 
             | They've had decades of child and adult abuse and they
             | continue to operate pretty much in the open in the USA and
             | hardly anyone has even heard of them.
             | 
             | https://apnews.com/article/nc-state-wire-north-carolina-
             | ap-t...
             | 
             | The idea that something like what the GP is describing
             | could not happen halfway across the world because it would
             | be so well covered is probably highly mistaken.
        
             | whimsicalism wrote:
             | I personally agree, it is ringing the "apocryphal" bell in
             | my head
        
           | b0afc375b5 wrote:
           | > After several months of being paid normally for normal
           | work, they're invited to a team-building event in SE Asia
           | 
           | Holy ####. This reminds me of my previous software developer
           | job when we were supposed to go to South Korea for God knows
           | what[0]. The reason why we had to go there wasn't really
           | explained well to me, and I didn't care enough to ask because
           | I was just excited to go to another country. In the end our
           | application was denied by the embassy, and I always felt a
           | bit disappointed by that.
           | 
           | Perhaps the possibility of my case being sinister is
           | miniscule, but maybe I shouldn't feel too disappointed.
           | 
           | [0] the owner of the company I worked for was South Korean
        
             | saiya-jin wrote:
             | I don't think that South Korea would fall into this
             | category, its pretty well developed and western-style
             | democracy (with some strong nepotic powers at place but
             | ultimately even they are not untouchable).
             | 
             | If you would be invited to say Philippines, Indonesia
             | (which covers Bali too), Myanmar, Laos etc. that should
             | raise an eyebrow.
        
               | rolph wrote:
               | just because someone says you are being taken to a
               | particular place doesnt mean thats where you will end up.
        
               | PeterisP wrote:
               | That's not how international travel works until you
               | totally leave civilization; no matter who's paying for
               | the trip, you do know where you're going, and each
               | individual has a choice at every border crossing; they
               | can't simply "export" a box filled with people on a plane
               | that's going "somewhere".
        
               | rolph wrote:
               | Thats only if they play by the rules and everyone is
               | honest and unfettered by coercion.
               | 
               | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37327558
        
               | mcpackieh wrote:
               | Yeah, but if you're a westerner being taken on a trip to
               | South Korea, read your plane ticket to see if that's
               | actually were you're going.
               | 
               | If the deal is more akin to "get in this van and my guy
               | will take you to where you need to go", then that's
               | another story.
        
               | bonestamp2 wrote:
               | > get in this van and my guy will take you to where you
               | need to go
               | 
               | That could have been their pickup from the airport.
        
               | rolph wrote:
               | once your in the air you are effectively detained.
               | 
               | a large number of situations, contrived or otherwise, can
               | result in emergency diversions.
               | 
               | you may want to be sure a connecting flight is legitimate
               | when travelling in 'suspect' regions.
               | 
               | this would be high profile kidnapping, but a source of
               | non SEA persons, that would be more convincing, and a
               | source of international ransom revenues, espescially if
               | they were also accused of some crime.
        
             | slingnow wrote:
             | So with zero substantiation from the OP (who admitted
             | this), you believe this explanation and you've now
             | connected it to some company trip to South Korea you once
             | didn't go on?
        
           | soared wrote:
           | Source? That sounds straight from a Facebook group
        
           | coconut_crab wrote:
           | The usual story here (Vietnam) is that the victims are often
           | promised a job with high earning prospect in Cambodia, or
           | they are in debt after playing in casinos over there. Since
           | Vietnam economy isn't in a good shape, there is no lack of
           | potential victims. They don't really get killed either as it
           | will cost the kidnappers, they will just get sold to another
           | scam center. Oh and the victim can buy their freedom back if
           | they scam enough people (my friend lost 10k USD in one such
           | scam), not that there is many people who can do that though.
        
         | granshaw wrote:
         | Where there is no opportunity, there will be crime
        
         | renegade-otter wrote:
         | Perhaps not as dramatic, but this is not uncommon.
         | 
         | HBO is right now running the documentary series Telemarketers,
         | about a US operation that is clearly a fraud, but it's
         | protected by corrupt and bribed police union management.
        
         | appleflaxen wrote:
         | It's the modern day slave trade.
        
         | bannedbybros wrote:
         | [dead]
        
         | brightball wrote:
         | The well connected politically is the weird thing about this to
         | me.
         | 
         | I think we can all agree that trafficking is...bad. Yet there
         | seems to be this strange political push back against anti-
         | trafficking efforts.
         | 
         | I've seen it for years to the point of pretending it's not even
         | a problem. The recent political reaction to Sound of Freedom,
         | which was not a political movie, is just the latest example.
         | 
         | It's one of the most worrisome aspects I've seen in general
         | "politicize everything" trends.
        
           | xwolfi wrote:
           | Politics is a fancy name for "controlling the rules well
           | enough to be able to prospect my little business".
           | Politicians are not all ideologically positive and
           | benevolent, or even patriotic or nationalist, some are really
           | just trying to find a way to do business better.
           | 
           | One of the worst banana republics in that regard are the USA:
           | here in China we'd never let a frigging casino operator rule
           | the country, we have a small pride still.
        
             | whimsicalism wrote:
             | Bo Xilai literally was on the Politburo and laundered
             | massive amounts of casino money from Macau internationally.
        
         | andrethegiant wrote:
         | Link to documentary?
        
           | ConfusedDog wrote:
           | I couldn't find the exact video I saw on YouTube. It's funny
           | if you search "escape Cambodia," a lot of Gordon Ramsey's
           | food videos pops up, but if you search "Tao Chu Jian Bu Zhai
           | " in Chinese, you find all these terrible trafficking cases.
        
             | larkaa wrote:
             | I'm guessing it's this video:
             | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-EtdC4zQso
        
           | aaron695 wrote:
           | This is the best for Cambodia - "Forced to Scam: Cambodia's
           | Cyber Slaves" by Al Jazeera -
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-EtdC4zQso
           | 
           | > local traffik orgs are armed with AKs
           | 
           | > police was part of the traffiking ring
           | 
           | These statements are not representative of Cambodia,
           | local/Chinese gangsters don't run around with AKs, and the
           | documentary is a little exaggerated like _all_ documentaries
           | but I don 't doubt there were suicides and beatings.
           | 
           | Some Facebook ads were very clear what you were doing. There
           | were not 100,000 working in Cambodia and most were not
           | trafficked.
           | 
           | This UN statement is garbage, liars bore me. It's why this is
           | progressing to organ harvesting and other rubbish because the
           | UN is bringing it to fantasy.
           | 
           | Watch the doco and they mention the amounts they were making,
           | then times that by 100,000 trafficked then all the ones who
           | answered the Facebook ads and it doesn't add up.
           | 
           | It's the Chinese doing this, which the UN page doesn't
           | mention. Maybe the report does. But it's a main point for a
           | summary... if the truth mattered.
           | 
           | Video of 40 people escaping a Chinese run Cambodian casino
           | https://e.vnexpress.net/news/news/40-people-swim-back-to-
           | vie...
        
             | zztop44 wrote:
             | Shoutout for 101 East, which does some excellent reportage
             | on a bunch of underreported East Asian and south East Asian
             | topics.
        
       | gumballindie wrote:
       | Not even scam bosses allow for remote work i see. Cant they just
       | like hire willing scam workers instead of trafficking people?
        
         | bboygravity wrote:
         | The scams with willing people are just called multi-level
         | marketing.
        
         | differentView wrote:
         | It's harder to beat the workers into working harder remotely.
         | Remote workers can also more easily work with law enforcement,
         | quit, and start competing scams.
        
           | gumballindie wrote:
           | A bit like legitimiate workers minus the beating part. That's
           | replaced by hazing, harrasment, gaslighting and bullying at
           | the work place. Same end goal, worker control, for both types
           | of businesses, legitimate or scam.
        
       | fortran77 wrote:
       | Are they scamming Westerners? (TFA wasn't clear). They'd have to
       | be pretty fluent in idomatic English to do that.
       | 
       | Do the 5-10 messages I get each week "Hi! This is Irene. Are you
       | going to the party?" come from trafficed people?
        
         | alephnerd wrote:
         | They started off targeting Chinese speakers (Mainland China,
         | Taiwan, HK, Malaysia, Singapore) but expanded into English and
         | Thai over the past few years.
        
         | em500 wrote:
         | I'm guessing that they're mostly targeting the richer Asian
         | countries, including China (which is on average is poorer than
         | the West, but in the aggregate has comparable spending power as
         | North America).
        
         | Avicebron wrote:
         | If it's not automated, it could easily be some sort of pre-
         | defined script. I don't get many anymore, but I've definitely
         | had mysterious text messages from different numbers supposedly
         | across the country that were nearly identical. Usually it was
         | "hey is this [random name], where were you last night?" I
         | assume this was meant to draw me into some sort of dialogue. It
         | happened enough that I can't really believe it was just a
         | misdial.
        
         | magic123_ wrote:
         | A relative of mine got scammed for tens of thousands of dollars
         | exactly this way. They are college educated, COO of the company
         | they founded in the US, and thought they were just making a new
         | friend over several months after receiving a message that was
         | addressed to them by error.
        
         | knodi123 wrote:
         | From what I understand, initial messages don't come from the
         | slaves; instead, you get connected to one if you reply. So the
         | english skills might shift drastically between the first and
         | second message.
        
       | freedude wrote:
       | Slavery is an old, detestable practice. There are more slaves
       | worldwide today than in any other time in history. Welcome to
       | modern civilization. Contemplate that the next time you use
       | something made in China or another third world country. This is a
       | common practice.
       | 
       | https://www.un.org/en/delegate/50-million-people-modern-slav...
        
       | shiftpgdn wrote:
       | This isn't new, but it's good to continue to report on it. I
       | remember even back in 2005 it was generally well known that the
       | gold farmers in World of Warcraft were likely Chinese prison
       | labor. There were even a few articles about it:
       | https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/chinese-pr...
        
         | mistrial9 wrote:
         | Labor historically in a lot of places, was built on peasant-
         | serfs, indentured servitude with a duration, or in many cases
         | slaves. I believe that many educated people in the West are not
         | aware of the extent to which this is true throughout history.
        
           | whimsicalism wrote:
           | I agree that this is true, however I also think that when we
           | imagine slavery in the West we think of chattel slavery and
           | the reality is that what we call slavery in these peasant-
           | serf contexts was not the same thing, did not have the same
           | mortality rates, etc.
        
         | jedmeyers wrote:
         | My friend in Eastern Europe ran a bot farm in WoW. He ran bots
         | on his computers that farmed resources, then sold resources for
         | gold and then sold the gold to Chinese for end-user resale. The
         | only labor involved was hiring some college students and paying
         | them for each top-level character they progress that can be
         | used for farming. He even bought my character for $50 when I
         | stopped playing.
        
         | logicchains wrote:
         | There's a big difference between prisoners (who at least in
         | theory are locked up as punishment for committing a crime) and
         | people who've been trafficked into slavery. Even the US uses
         | prison labour, but it's people who committed crimes. What's
         | happening in SEA is kidnappping innocent people, locking them
         | in guarded compounds and forcing them to scam people, and they
         | get raped or beaten if they refuse.
        
           | giraffe_lady wrote:
           | The difference is really not that large, if it exists at all
           | which I don't find to be the case. What severity of crime
           | justifies enslavement? You can have your sentence extended
           | for refusing to labor, regardless of what you're originally
           | in there for. Is that just? Is there "a big difference"
           | between that and trafficked labor?
        
           | jacquesm wrote:
           | That's true in principle _but_ the laws and legal system are
           | set up in such a way that a very large percentage of
           | particular demographics will end up in this situation and
           | from an outsiders perspective it doesn 't look all that
           | different.
        
             | zirgs wrote:
             | You can simply not deal drugs. It's not that difficult.
        
               | r2_pilot wrote:
               | I'm glad you've never been framed for a crime you didn't
               | commit.
        
             | logicchains wrote:
             | Even if you see it as China enslaving its own citizens
             | under false pretences of criminality, that's still quite
             | different from private entities in one country luring
             | people from another country under the false pretences of
             | high-paying jobs and then enslaving them.
        
               | jacquesm wrote:
               | Yes, there are differences. But there are also some
               | pretty worrisome similarities. And the numbers in the US
               | are _far_ higher than those mentioned in TFA, especially
               | when taken over the decades that this has been happening.
        
               | logicchains wrote:
               | The difference is that the US is a democracy and people
               | voted for the politicians who created those laws (and the
               | attorney generals who enforce them), so by democratic
               | logic the people convicted by the system "deserve" to be
               | imprisoned to some degree.
        
               | k8fj30gs wrote:
               | When starving 9 people voting to eat the 10th is still
               | democracy, and by democratic logic they would "deserve"
               | it to some degree.
        
               | hnfong wrote:
               | Tyranny of the majority is a thing.
               | 
               | Sometimes it's not even the majority. Politicians are
               | elected for their main policies that usually involve a
               | couple things, but there are thousands of laws and it
               | doesn't follow that every one of them has majority
               | support.
               | 
               | It's also a matter of inertia to "overthrow" the
               | government in power. In democracies there's a peaceful
               | way to do this, and in autocracies there isn't. The fact
               | that autocratic governments aren't yet toppled does mean
               | something, though obviously not much. But then, the fact
               | that the government is democratically elected doesn't
               | necessarily mean much either. (You sure Americans like
               | Trump?)
        
               | logicchains wrote:
               | >Tyranny of the majority is a thing.
               | 
               | While that may be true, surely philosophically speaking
               | there's a significant, qualitative difference between
               | saying "this is moral because people voted for it" and
               | saying "this is moral because the stupid victims deserved
               | it". Many people would accept the former, accept that
               | prison labour is morally justified, but very few people
               | would accept that it's morally okay for private criminal
               | gangs to kidnap and enslave people.
        
               | jacquesm wrote:
               | Philosophically speaking, from the perspective of a
               | victim it's all the same. They don't have the luxury of
               | being able to philosophize about it, they are too busy
               | dealing with the reality of it.
        
               | jacquesm wrote:
               | Fortunately politicians are never influenced by money or
               | ideology and 100% represent the choices of the voters.
        
           | sidewndr46 wrote:
           | I don't think "Even the US" is a valid way to justify
           | slavery. I mean, even the US had slavery at one point right?
        
             | celtoid wrote:
             | "Slavery is still constitutionally legal in the United
             | States."[0]
             | 
             | [0] https://www.baltimoresun.com/opinion/editorial/bs-
             | ed-1209-13...
        
           | iterminate wrote:
           | "Even" the US isn't much of a moral barometer for prisoner
           | treatment. The US uses prison labor because the US is one of
           | the worst countries for prisoner (mis)treatment, certainly
           | the worst in the west.
           | 
           | > There's a big difference between prisoners (who at least in
           | theory are locked up as punishment for committing a crime)
           | and people who've been trafficked into slavery[...] What's
           | happening in SEA is kidnappping innocent people
           | 
           | Lots of people in prison are innocent, especially in the US.
           | Prisoners are no less deserving of rights and fair treatment
           | than victims of trafficking. Likewise, I'm sure many
           | trafficking victims are guilty of committing crimes (as are
           | most people).
        
             | jart wrote:
             | I know a few degenerates who would happily go to prison if
             | prison labor was mining gold in WoW.
        
             | mcpackieh wrote:
             | Prison labor is not intrinsically bad, but they should not
             | be exempt from minimum wage laws. Ideally there should be
             | some mechanism for forcing prisons to pay the prisoners a
             | fair market wage; even if the prisoner doesn't deserve it,
             | the rest of the labor market deserves to not compete with
             | underpaid prison labor. And we need another constitutional
             | amendment, removing the exemption for convicted criminals
             | in the 13th.
             | 
             | If those issues were cleared up, then giving prisoners the
             | opportunity to learn how to earn money legitimately would
             | be good for rehabilitation. So prison labor is not
             | intrinsically mistreatment.
        
             | ajmurmann wrote:
             | The big difference between the US and other western
             | countries' philosophy about prison is that most (all?) EU
             | countries see the main goal as rehabilitation whereas the
             | US sees the primary goal as punishment.
        
             | logicchains wrote:
             | >Prisoners are no less deserving of rights and fair
             | treatment than victims of trafficking
             | 
             | Everywhere in the world it's accepted that prisoners lose
             | the rights to freedom of movement and association; that's
             | what being a prisoner means. In that sense trafficking
             | victims are absolutely more deserving of those rights than
             | convicted criminals.
        
               | jl2718 wrote:
               | I question the utility of imprisonment to achieve any
               | legitimate social goal. It may not be an effective
               | deterrent of the most heinous crimes. It doesn't seem to
               | work as rehabilitation. It only works as physical
               | prevention of recidivism in people that lack self-
               | awareness and self-control to prevent it, but
               | unfortunately those are exonerating conditions in our
               | system. It seems to me that prison should be understood
               | and used in the opposite way: not punishment, but a
               | compassionate alternative to remove people from society.
               | Punishment and deterrence are something different from a
               | behaviorist perspective, and there are other things that
               | work better, faster, and cheaper. Physical pain is
               | punishment: pepper spray, bullet ants, microwave cannons,
               | carbon dioxide. Deterrence is mainly the quality of
               | alternatives available, for which there should be a floor
               | established, like an agricultural labor camp at sub-
               | minimum wage.
        
               | _jal wrote:
               | > In that sense trafficking victims are absolutely more
               | deserving of those rights than convicted criminals.
               | 
               | No. you assume conviction = guilt, and that whatever
               | treatment that comes thereafter is just.
               | 
               | For instance, it appears you would endorse treating
               | people like these trafficking victims if they were first
               | convicted by some court you consider valid, since "that's
               | what being a prisoner means".
        
               | the_other wrote:
               | Might is right, huh?
        
               | logicchains wrote:
               | What would you consider an acceptable alternative? If
               | criminals were not stripped of freedom of movement, then
               | what would deter potential future criminals from
               | committing crime? Prison is meant to act as a deterrent
               | so that people with no moral compass have some incentive
               | not to commit crimes.
        
               | pmarreck wrote:
               | According to the data, prison is not a deterrent:
               | 
               | https://www.vera.org/news/research-shows-that-long-
               | prison-se...
               | 
               | Instead of focusing on the penal system, which is fairly
               | hopeless, we should focus on preventing people from
               | entering the penal system in the first place by focusing
               | on systematic improvements that reduce criminal behavior
               | as an appealing option. Look up "rational choice theory"
               | with regards to criminal behavior: https://en.wikipedia.o
               | rg/wiki/Rational_choice_theory_(crimin...
               | 
               | But that all said, the fact that the penal system is not
               | mutated based on sensible performance metrics such as
               | recidivism rate etc. is a human failing. The thing is,
               | the system has already failed them at that point and they
               | made their decision to not cooperate with society, so of
               | course the people who have chosen to cooperate with
               | society (the same people who have not sufficiently
               | contributed to the systematic improvements that would
               | have prevented that behavior to begin with) will fail to
               | care about them.
               | 
               | My participation in this is to mentor young men (some are
               | "at-risk", which basically means that their demographics
               | are more likely to lead to criminal behavior), which I've
               | done a few times and which is rewarding, because young
               | men _really need it_ right now. If I didn 't have a 2
               | year old son who is keeping my hands quite full, I think
               | I'd do it again.
        
               | alexb_ wrote:
               | The main purpose of prison is not rehabilitation, or
               | deterrence, but to put dangerous individuals away so they
               | cannot terrorize others. This is why we put rapists in
               | cells (or, at least we try to) - every year in a jail
               | cell is a year they aren't raping women.
        
               | ImPostingOnHN wrote:
               | that is not the main purpose at all
               | 
               | the main purpose is punishment, see: nonviolent drug
               | offenders in prison
               | 
               | one might argue a higher level purpose is to keep "the
               | right people" in prison, where they lose their freedom,
               | sometimes including the freedom to run against, campaign
               | against, and even vote out the politicians keeping them
               | there
        
               | pmarreck wrote:
               | I might suggest that the purpose _as stated_ , the
               | purpose _as expected_ and the purpose _as actually
               | practiced_ might all be different
        
               | almostnormal wrote:
               | > In that sense trafficking victims are absolutely more
               | deserving of those rights than convicted criminals.
               | 
               | Except the innocent but incorrecty convicted
               | (non)criminals.
               | 
               | On the other hand, some of the victims might not be
               | convicted but guilty of something. But even those should
               | better be taken care of by the regular system.
        
               | stevenally wrote:
               | If there is profit in holding people prisoner, then there
               | is an incentive to falsely imprison people. Or give them
               | overly long sentences.
        
               | pmarreck wrote:
               | Agreed. There should only be a cost associated with
               | punitive action. The incentive should be to get them out
               | of the system (or, don't laugh- maybe rehabilitate
               | them?), not to keep them in it.
        
               | l33t7332273 wrote:
               | But the people who profit are not the people who are able
               | to falsely imprison people.
        
               | teh64 wrote:
               | Incorrect, they get kickbacks:
               | https://www.npr.org/2022/08/18/1118108084/michael-
               | conahan-ma...
        
               | l33t7332273 wrote:
               | I think this is sort of the exception that proves the
               | rule. The people profiting form prisons have direct
               | incentives to increase prison populations , but the
               | people who can actually falsely imprison people have, at
               | best, illegal side channel incentives.
        
               | ceejayoz wrote:
               | There are non-illegal side channels, like "tough on
               | crime" judges getting political donations from deep-
               | pocketed interested parties.
        
               | magic123_ wrote:
               | Except when judges get kickbacks from prisons for sending
               | them prisoners.
               | 
               | https://www.npr.org/2022/08/18/1118108084/michael-
               | conahan-ma...
        
               | egonschiele wrote:
               | This is not as simple as your argument makes it out to
               | be. The US has a long history of imprisoning people so
               | they can be used as slaves. Netflix has a good
               | documentary on it:
               | 
               | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krfcq5pF8u8
        
             | CalRobert wrote:
             | Of course, in the US you can still enslave prisoners
             | 
             | """ Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a
             | punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly
             | convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any
             | place subject to their jurisdiction. """
             | 
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirteenth_Amendment_to_the_U
             | n...
        
             | wavemode wrote:
             | Citation needed? I'm unfamiliar with what metric or data
             | you could be referring to in order to conclude that the US
             | is the worst country in the West for prisoner mistreatment.
        
               | iterminate wrote:
               | Any metric. Pick a country with a well regarded prison
               | system (e.g: Norway) and then compare the U.S. system on
               | every metric to see the disparity. Injury, sickness,
               | malnourishment, violence, education, recidivism, drugs,
               | forced labor, mental health. No country that is typically
               | considered as part of "the west" comes close to any of
               | these metrics when compared to the United States.
               | 
               | A question for you: which country in "the west" can you
               | think of that has worse prisoner treatment than the US?
        
               | SoftTalker wrote:
               | Apples and oranges. Norway is a tiny country with a very
               | homogenous population. The US is huge and very diverse
               | socioeconomically, racially, and culturally.
        
               | zztop44 wrote:
               | Which western country do you have in mind where it might
               | be worse to be a prisoner than the US?
        
           | gentleman11 wrote:
           | The USA still uses slave labour, sorry to inform you. Bust
           | somebody for pot possession, and to protect society, gotta
           | force them to work for basically free? Give me a break. Your
           | country is still a slave leasing one, if not a slave owning
           | one
           | 
           | The ancient Greeks often used crime or war as an excuse to
           | capture slaves. At least they had the honesty to call them
           | slaves afterwards
        
           | steve1977 wrote:
           | > There's a big difference between prisoners (who at least in
           | theory are locked up as punishment for committing a crime)
           | and people who've been trafficked into slavery.
           | 
           | Considering what can probably get you in jail in a country
           | like China, I'm not so sure about that.
        
             | cultofmetatron wrote:
             | its also a really big misalignment of incentives when
             | prisons can use prisoners as a profit center though their
             | labor. they take away jobs from free people who would have
             | been able to do those jobs and get a (more)fair wage for it
        
         | whimsicalism wrote:
         | Sorry, but that is insufficient evidence to me for something to
         | be "generally well known." It is well known that there are
         | flawed incentives to testify in Western contexts to things that
         | did not happen in East Asia, this is known among South Korean
         | defectors (not denying that NK is objectively terrible, one of
         | the worst countries in the world - but defectors to SK have
         | been known to say outright false things because this is how
         | they get paid and get media attention and many of these
         | publications will pay for stories).
         | 
         | Something that is "generally well known" by contrast is that
         | China almost certainly harvested organs from prisoners in the
         | 90s and early 2000s.
        
       | csomar wrote:
       | I don't know about Myanmar but I am a little bit skeptical about
       | "hundreds of thousands" in the rest (Thailand, Laos, Cambodia).
       | I've traveled the region extensively and am in a remote place in
       | Laos now.
       | 
       | I think the UN is using the word "trafficked" way too liberally.
       | While I heard stories from fellow travelers and citizens (only in
       | Cambodia, be careful in Phnom Penh and don't go to Sinahouk); my
       | guess is that the majority of these are in some kind of situation
       | (like owing money to the boss) or maybe justifying what they are
       | doing (it's not a crime if you are forced!).
       | 
       | For some reason, I find this "hundreds of thousands" quite
       | sinister. It devalues the whole issue as it normalizes it; while
       | there are some people now in real need of help and in real
       | danger.
        
         | cheeze wrote:
         | I mean, these aren't people locked up on slave ships and hauled
         | to a new world or something, but they are absolutely trafficked
         | in that they are forced to do the work against their will
         | without a way out - literally modern slavery.
         | 
         | This comment feels mega weird to me, like you're trying to
         | downplay the plight of these hundreds of thousands of modern-
         | day slaves because it doesn't meet your definition of
         | trafficking.
         | 
         | I'm certainly going to trust official figures coming from the
         | UN over someone on HN who happens to be traveling in SEA
        
           | hungryforcodes wrote:
           | I don't see in any country in SEA -- and I live out here --
           | how you could hide 100K people in concertation camps to do
           | high tech scamming.
           | 
           | There is a comment above about someone's Laotian wife working
           | hard conditions doing these scams because it pays much better
           | than local work -- this seems much more convincing.
           | 
           | Even the issue with the Vietnamese casino workers was only 40
           | people -- though not to minimize it's importance.
        
             | deadbeeves wrote:
             | We're talking about hundreds of thousands across several
             | countries, not in a single facility. If you have 50
             | prisoners per building, you only need 4000 buildings like
             | that to get to 200k. This could be happening anywhere, even
             | in large cities. You don't need huge infrastructure per
             | location to do this, though it does take some logistics to
             | keep it up. Running a clandestine prison in the middle of a
             | city is not trivial, but certainly not impossible to keep
             | under wraps. I'm surprised it's profitable, though.
        
           | Eridrus wrote:
           | Many advocacy groups (particularly those making claims about
           | human trafficking) fudge their numbers to make their cause
           | seem more important, and you can see why, we would probably
           | not be discussing this article without such an eye catching
           | statistic in it.
           | 
           | If you try to see how they got this number in their report it
           | is "credible estimates/sources" that are "on file at OHCR".
           | So there's no way to independently verify this, you have to
           | just trust them, which doesn't breed confidence in their
           | estimates.
        
             | hungryforcodes wrote:
             | Anecdotally I met an NGO worker once in Phenom Phen who was
             | drunk and admitted exactly this -- because he had to
             | justify his 200K Euro job in that city. With that salary
             | you're like a king, you'd probably do alot to keep it.
        
       | mithras wrote:
       | My wife's niece is from Laos and works for one of these chinese
       | scam shops in the golden triangle. She is there voluntarily
       | because it makes 5 times more money than her best alternative.
       | Morally repugnant of course.
        
       | elric wrote:
       | Hundreds of thousands? That's a mind boggling scale. That's at
       | least the size of a decent city. How do you even cope with the
       | logistics of dealing with 100k+ scammers?
        
       | dangus wrote:
       | This is why I discourage people from playing games with scammers
       | to "waste their time."
       | 
       | I always assumed that they were not really doing this job by
       | choice, whether it's modern slavery or not.
       | 
       | You're not saving someone else from getting scammed, you're
       | messing up a quota for someone who might be physically punished
       | for missing it.
        
         | jstarfish wrote:
         | > You're not saving someone else from getting scammed, you're
         | messing up a quota for someone who might be physically punished
         | for missing it.
         | 
         | At some level, starving the beast is the only way to stop it.
         | The more crimes they commit, the more likely it is they get
         | _caught._ You can 't account for the disposition of victims in
         | the hands of thugs, and there's no guarantee victims _won 't_
         | get fed to pigs even if they were consistently Employee of the
         | Month. If you already have a viable way to dispose of bodies,
         | why let _anybody_ leave?
         | 
         | The better reason not to play games with scammers is that
         | you're antagonizing someone who does not respect rule of law.
         | Consider what someone overconfident in their ability to commit
         | crimes unchecked might do to you in retribution.
        
         | mcpackieh wrote:
         | It's sad that these scammers are victims themselves, but
         | measures that reduce the extent to which these victims can
         | victimize other people are a clear net good for society. You
         | won't save a trafficked scammer by hanging up early so he can
         | move on to easier marks, but you _can_ prevent him from using
         | the next hour to make a new victim out of somebody else.
         | 
         | Or to put this in other terms; you're a Ukrainian machine
         | gunner. In the distance you see Russian soldiers. You know that
         | many of them are from the Russian gulags, unjustly imprisoned
         | in an oppressive autocracy, quite likely for a crime they
         | didn't commit, and now forced to invade a foreign country. You
         | pull the trigger and mow those victims down, because if you
         | don't those victims will make victims out of your friends,
         | family, and fellow countrymen.
        
         | lacrimacida wrote:
         | If everyones quota goes to zero perhaps the master behind these
         | scams go down with it.
        
           | dangus wrote:
           | If I don't pay the prostitute it's definitely not the pimp
           | who is going to get bruises.
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | aphroz wrote:
       | A good thing that soon AI will be able to scam us as good as
       | humans so they won't need to traffick people anymore.
        
         | lacrimacida wrote:
         | And would that make life better for traffick victims in any
         | way? They'll brutally be repurposed for some other dirty work
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | logicchains wrote:
       | There's a recent Chinese blockbuster about this called No More
       | Bets, inspired by a true story. But in the movie the victim is
       | saved; in real life he's still enslaved
        
         | em500 wrote:
         | Another one is Lost In The Stars.
         | 
         | https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/haven-for-scams-hit-movies...
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | kazanz wrote:
       | > The scam centres generate revenue amounting to billions of US
       | dollars each year. Revenue in 2021 from scamming globally
       | amounted to USD 7.8 billion worth of stolen cryptocurrency.
       | 
       | Crypto has made scamming easier than ever. Ironically, it
       | probably is making it easier to track how impactful it is too.
        
         | delusional wrote:
         | It's a nice honeypot. All the scammers are busy scamming each
         | other.
        
       | sproketboy wrote:
       | [dead]
        
       | brap wrote:
       | I wonder if low quality scams (made by humans) are still going to
       | be a thing given advances in AI.
       | 
       | I bet a human sounding bot can already make a phone call and scam
       | most of our grandparents far better than the average human
       | scammer. Add the ability to mimic the voice of a relative and you
       | can get pretty high success rates, even with more tech-savvy
       | victims I bet.
        
         | aunth067 wrote:
         | it's already happening at scale, there was a 60 minutes segment
         | on this recently https://www.cbsnews.com/news/what-being-
         | targeted-by-grandpar...
         | 
         | The "ethical hacker" shows them how to use an AI to spoof the
         | 60 minutes host's voice, then use it to scam a 60 minutes
         | employee on camera, in real time. It works.
        
         | 1-6 wrote:
         | Eventually, it's going there but at the moment, people are
         | mostly using low-tech methods to scam others. Oftentimes we'll
         | overestimate/underestimate the abilities of scammers. It's
         | important to realize that access to cloud services and
         | sophisticated AI requires money for that infrastructure and
         | these paltry scammers won't do that unless it's a part of a
         | bigger org.
        
           | brap wrote:
           | I'm guessing that most of these scams are coming from large
           | orgs as described in the OP/comments, this seems like a
           | fairly expensive operation. I'm also guessing that for about
           | the same cost they could use AI to cast a much wider net,
           | making it more profitable even if the quality is lower. The
           | paltry individual scammers will probably go out of business
           | soon.
        
         | slig wrote:
         | Low quality and obvious scams are a feature, they filter only
         | the most gullible.
        
           | brap wrote:
           | I think you only need to filter when your scale is very
           | limited due to the effort involved. A human can only make so
           | many calls per day. AI makes these attempts much cheaper.
        
             | lacrimacida wrote:
             | I think AI chatbots will lift these scams to a new level
             | never seen before without any telltale signs that we can
             | spot.
        
               | costco wrote:
               | Well, maybe it can fix the grammatical mistakes and
               | inconsistencies in their stories. There still remains the
               | fact that this person you've never met before is
               | suggesting you send hundreds of thousands of dollars to
               | this great investment platform you've never heard of and
               | is very interested in you yet can't meet up despite have
               | talked for weeks.
        
         | lr4444lr wrote:
         | First it was Kenyan academic ghost writers for hire, now AI
         | putting traffickers out or business too? What's this world
         | coming to....
        
           | brap wrote:
           | Sadly I don't expect things will get better for the
           | trafficked victims, this only lowers their "value" in the
           | eyes of criminals. They will probably find even worse uses
           | for them.
        
       | throwaway67743 wrote:
       | This is not new at all, there are US companies facilitating this
       | (see: Tinder e.g) with zero regard for the lives of the people
       | forced into doing this. They actively ignore these things and
       | profit off it, absolutely disgusting.
        
         | troglotit wrote:
         | Tinder slave-labour is used also for assembling drones in
         | Russia that attack Ukraine. Source (RU):
         | https://istories.media/news/2023/07/24/studenti-dolzhni-stra...
        
         | logicchains wrote:
         | LinkedIn and various job boards have much more responsibility
         | than Tinder; most of the victims described in the article
         | travel to SEA for what they've been led to believe are high-
         | paying white-collar jobs, not because they're romance-scammed
         | into going to meet a partner there.
        
           | alephnerd wrote:
           | LinkedIn isn't common in ASEAN. It's a uniquely North
           | American phenomenon (194m Americans), though there is some
           | traction in India (94m), Brazil (60m), and China (57m).
           | 
           | Most users offered the jobs are getting them via everything
           | apps like WeChat, Zalo, WhatsApp forwards, Viber, Line, etc.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | messe wrote:
             | > It's a uniquely North American phenomenon
             | 
             | I don't think that's an entirely accurate assessment.
             | There's a significant userbase in Europe as well, on the
             | same order of magnitude as North America.
        
             | throwaway67743 wrote:
             | This is an accurate assessment, on the other hand things
             | like tinder actually have more reach in Asia mostly due to
             | cultural differences.
        
           | throwaway67743 wrote:
           | LinkedIn has a much lower hit rate, because people tend to
           | search for region specific jobs, whereas Tinder you can send
           | any location you desire with your fake profile (but they're
           | very easy to spot).
           | 
           | The Tinder things are very rarely romance scams, they pivot
           | to crypto scams immediately, "I work in the finance industry
           | scoping out markets for crypto" etc - then I'd imagine they'd
           | encourage someone to invest but they usually see through my
           | attempts at scamming them back, one day I'll figure it out.
        
             | lacrimacida wrote:
             | LinkedIn was used in a lot of scams with fake jobs.
        
               | throwaway67743 wrote:
               | Sure, but the hit rate is still much lower.
        
         | naillo wrote:
         | What is tinder doing to facilitate this? I assumed bots on
         | there were just financial scam bots not of the trafficking kind
        
           | Nextgrid wrote:
           | "bots" don't run on their own. While the initial message
           | might be from a bot, leads need to then be coached into
           | falling for the scam which involves human labor and can very
           | well be such enslaved victims trapped in third-world
           | countries.
        
             | throwaway67743 wrote:
             | Correct, I did some research into this, while the initial
             | match is automated, you're connected with someone likely
             | under duress, Tinder/Match do not care about this at all
             | (in my present country its 80%+ profiles that are evidently
             | human trafficking and extortion). After asking what they
             | intend to do about the horrific rights violations they're
             | profiting off, they said, "we don't care" literally.
             | 
             | There is also the collateral, the profiles/photos they
             | steal are of real people, which may or may not end up in
             | real life ramifications for them. It used to be entirely
             | generic Asians (Orient, not SE, as they're more attractive
             | to the west apparently) - but these days they've upped the
             | game and use region specific photos (ie; in my case, Slavic
             | origin)
        
             | gumballindie wrote:
             | As soon as sam altman hears about this he will make a
             | proposal about replacing scam humans with ai. Which in
             | itself is better than trafficking humans i suppose.
        
               | throwaway67743 wrote:
               | AI can't feel suffering, after all.
        
               | gumballindie wrote:
               | Indeed. It's usually those around it that feel it.
        
               | throwaway67743 wrote:
               | ai is literally the human equivalent of a sociopath
               | and/or narcissist, it's devoid of human emotion
        
               | sp332 wrote:
               | Training AI also requires lots of human labor.
               | https://gizmodo.com/openai-chatgpt-ai-chat-bot-1850001021
        
           | popularonion wrote:
           | Tinder has become totally swarmed with these kind of
           | scammers. It's way worse than it was a few years ago.
           | 
           | It's becoming basically unusable unless you communicate with
           | photo verified users only, but I'm sure a lot of photo
           | verified accounts are run by these scammers too.
        
             | throwaway67743 wrote:
             | Yup, the verification works against regular users and in
             | favour of automation. But that's a good business model for
             | them, without impossibly attractive potential matches
             | nobody would pay for anything, so they have no financial
             | desire to stop it.
        
       | boeingUH60 wrote:
       | I've had a random person contact me out of the blue on Telegram
       | and try to build a friendship that obviously ends in a pig
       | butchering scam.
       | 
       | Fortunately, I have a rule to never make online friends. If I've
       | not met someone in a personal or professional setting before, I
       | assume they're a robot unless proven otherwise.
       | 
       | Some pig butchers have also tried to contact my parents, but my
       | parents are careful, and I immediately block any such number.
       | 
       | Pretty sad to see that these operations could easily be stopped,
       | but the perpetrators live in extremely corrupt places/semi-failed
       | states where they just pay bribes to the local authorities to
       | leave them alone.
        
         | smeyer wrote:
         | That's a nice way to avoid scams, but the cost doesn't seem
         | worth the benefits to me as someone who otherwise has good
         | awareness about scams. I've made some nice friends off the
         | internet and yet to fall for a scam, so it doesn't seem worth
         | locking out that possibility of friendship just to reduce the
         | odds of being scammed slightly more.
         | 
         | I could easily see giving very different advice to a friend
         | with less scam awareness, though (like an older friend with
         | limited knowledge of technology).
        
         | bettercallsalad wrote:
         | Can relate. I was in a dating app and there were so many of
         | them pretending "nice looking girl looking for husband" that
         | then tried to befriend you and tried crypto scam. It's so
         | smooth that even as someone who is relatively well versed in
         | the crypto world and associated scams I couldn't tell at least
         | in first two or three attempts. Their first few messages
         | leading upto this would be "do you believe in financial freedom
         | as for a happy life?" I would play along just to see what their
         | strategy is and it would almost always end up trying to lure
         | you into yield farming asking to deposit in some random wallet
         | address promising 15% monthly yield.
         | 
         | It was so frustrating at some point, my first questions to
         | someone matching me would be are you a crypto or onlyfan scam?
         | Man the online dating world has turned completely shameless.
        
           | soco wrote:
           | Just try Tumblr nowadays, which is not even a dating app. But
           | those scammers don't mind, they "only want to make friends"
           | and push ahead with one fresh empty profile after another.
           | And I'm sure it brings them profit, otherwise you wouldn't
           | see them swarming you by dozens.
        
         | apetresc wrote:
         | Sorry, is "pig butchering" a euphemism for something, or am I
         | missing out on some new scamming trend?
        
           | boeingUH60 wrote:
           | It's the name of the scam where they trick people into
           | investing in fake platforms and steal their money.
           | 
           | The scammer starts first by building a romantic relationship
           | with the target (this part can last weeks or months). Along
           | the way, they start suggesting cryptocurrency investments on
           | trading platforms that look legit at a glance but are fake
           | underneath. They instruct the target to deposit money into a
           | wallet, like any exchange, but the perpetrators just steal
           | the tokens and show the mark fake figures.
           | 
           | It's a long term thing that takes a ton of work...I have no
           | idea how the scammers even pull it off at scale.
           | 
           | This site goes into more detail;
           | https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/feature/Pig-butchering-
           | sca...
        
             | mschuster91 wrote:
             | > It's a long term thing that takes a ton of work...I have
             | no idea how the scammers even pull it off at scale.
             | 
             | When cost of living is a few hundred dollars a month at
             | best, looting 10k from a single mark is going to last quite
             | the time.
        
             | Zenul_Abidin wrote:
             | Someone's obviously making the websites, a few other people
             | are finding the victims, and all the money is funneled to
             | one overlord who pays everyone else a small cut of the
             | stolen money.
             | 
             | It is appalling that no social platform is taking this
             | seriously.
        
               | bloopernova wrote:
               | > It is appalling that no social platform is taking this
               | seriously.
               | 
               | The big social media corps won't eat into their profits
               | by hiring people to find the scammers.
               | 
               | It will take a law that says something about keeping a
               | human in the loop, or that your reports should always be
               | validated by a human.
        
               | soco wrote:
               | Tumblr has created a special reporting type exactly for
               | these, and they do disappear afterwards quickly (tested
               | this). But by the amount of requests I still receive
               | daily from fresh and empty accounts, I guess the work on
               | _avoiding_ them in the first place still has a lot to
               | catch up. A quarantine period for fresh users risks
               | alienating legit ones, IP filtering won 't bring it too
               | far, no idea what one could do to quench it.
        
             | jamal-kumar wrote:
             | It's really nasty, I lost contact with an ex girlfriend
             | after her social media got taken over by this shit. Still
             | no idea if it was just her account that got taken over or
             | if she got swept up into some nonsense.
        
               | Given_47 wrote:
               | Idk, I've seen the former happen pretty frequently. They
               | basically just socially engineer getting ur login
               | credentials from u. I'm not even sure how the
               | conversation would start but I would guess it's one of
               | the end goals of "Special offer for u! Check your DM!"
               | incessant comments
        
               | jamal-kumar wrote:
               | It felt way more insidious than that, they were really
               | either trying to be her or roped her into something. I've
               | seen the latter happen pretty frequently, probably
               | because I don't tend to live in what you might call prime
               | target countries for these types of scams to hit as an
               | endgame (NA/Europe/wherever else the money is greener)
        
           | btseytlin wrote:
           | "take it all" - https://www.wired.com/story/what-is-pig-
           | butchering-scam/
        
           | cottage-cheese wrote:
           | Both, for instance https://www.wired.com/story/what-is-pig-
           | butchering-scam/
        
           | heja2009 wrote:
           | The term was also new to me. From [1] I understand it is a
           | class of cryptocurrency scams starting by building a cordial
           | relationship via social media or dating apps and then
           | suggesting financial investment.
           | 
           | [1] https://www.michigan.gov/ag/consumer-protection/consumer-
           | ale...
        
             | ceejayoz wrote:
             | So-named because you "fatten up the pig" before slaughter.
        
           | illwrks wrote:
           | "The pig butchering scam is a type of fraud in which
           | criminals lure victims into digital relationships to build
           | trust before convincing them to invest in cryptocurrency
           | platforms. Unbeknownst to victims, the fraudsters control the
           | platforms and will eventually take all the money and vanish.
           | "
           | 
           | I've taken it from the article here:
           | https://www.aura.com/learn/the-pig-butchering-scam
        
             | k8fj30gs wrote:
             | See this documentary:
             | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bW4wYV0V-5s
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | yalogin wrote:
       | They torture people to do online scams? What a bizarre world this
       | has become. Never thought we would see trafficked and online
       | scams in the same sentence. Effectively, I guess, they don't want
       | to pay the employees and so force them at gun point.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-08-30 23:01 UTC)