[HN Gopher] Dining like Darwin: When scientists swallow their su...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Dining like Darwin: When scientists swallow their subjects (2015)
        
       Author : thunderbong
       Score  : 79 points
       Date   : 2023-08-28 17:13 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.npr.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.npr.org)
        
       | ChrisArchitect wrote:
       | (2021)
        
       | debo_ wrote:
       | Charles Darwin: The Original Kirby
        
       | dontreact wrote:
       | I'm left curious what the 20 pound rodent was. Capybara?
       | 
       | "In Venezuela, capybara meat was so popular that sometime between
       | the 16th and 18th centuries, clergymen petitioned to continue
       | eating it during Lent. Although biology says otherwise, the
       | Catholic Church agreed. They declared that the capybara was a
       | "fish" and therefore acceptable to eat during Lent."
       | 
       | Found this after a bit of googling
        
         | mucle6 wrote:
         | This fact brightened my day, thanks for sharing!
        
         | shagie wrote:
         | [dead]
        
         | anon____ wrote:
         | Rabbits are counted as birds in Japanese, possibly for a
         | similar reason.
         | 
         | https://archive.ph/AFP0F
        
       | snowwrestler wrote:
       | Not to spoil it too much, but this concept is part of the plot of
       | the movie _The Pirates! Band of Misfits_ , a thoroughly silly and
       | fun claymation movie with Charles Darwin as a main character
       | (along many pirates and Queen Victoria). It's by Aardman
       | Animation, which is famous for the Wallace & Gromit films.
        
         | wgrover wrote:
         | I had the same thought. BTW, the movie is titled "The Pirates!
         | In an Adventure with Scientists!" in the UK (same as the book
         | it's based on). The studio changed the title for Americans [1],
         | perhaps assuming we'd be less interested in a movie with
         | _scientists_ , shudder...
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pirates!_In_an_Adventure_w...
        
       | ftxbro wrote:
       | > Although Darwin eventually did quite well in his final exams,
       | most of his three years was spent eating exotic meats with his
       | Glutton Club, drinking a bit too much, riding his horse, and of
       | course collecting beetles.
       | 
       | Imagine how much student debt he must have had when he graduated,
       | and not even learned to code. smh. But he developed better taste
       | than the common man, which shows that he deserved the better
       | things that came to him in his life.
        
         | supazek wrote:
         | What are you even mad at?
        
           | hydrogen7800 wrote:
           | To me it seems ftxbro is jesting at the fact that Darwin
           | studied a "useless" subject rather than something practical
           | and marketable, like modern liberal arts majors saddled with
           | tons of debt.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | morkalork wrote:
       | Lucky he didn't eat something like a polar bear liver
        
       | retrocryptid wrote:
       | Good thing he didn't discover any poisonous mushrooms.
        
       | uwagar wrote:
       | thank god he didnt discover the tiger or rhino.
        
       | yelling_cat wrote:
       | The Voyage of the Beagle is a fun read, with many little asides
       | about what the animals Darwin ate tasted like. Puma meat was one
       | he called out as particularly delicious and remarkably like veal.
        
       | nonethewiser wrote:
       | It's pretty amazing that meat is a substantial part of our diet
       | yet most people probably only eat 3-10 different animals.
       | 
       | Edit: I forgot about sea food. So I guess its higher for many,
       | but some people dont eat much seafood. Regardless, I still think
       | it's interesting that we eat a minuscule fraction of land
       | animals.
        
         | dfxm12 wrote:
         | I think this is an obvious side effect of industrialization. We
         | got really good at factory farming chickens/cows/pigs/etc. and
         | catching/processing certain fish, like tuna, sardines, salmon,
         | etc. so that's the cheapest meat to get to market and the
         | cheapest to buy, so that's what we eat. There's room for
         | regional variations, like more seafood is around the
         | Mediterranean sea compared to the Midwest US.
         | 
         | Then, most cookbooks call for these in recipes, so it becomes
         | more in demand. This causes something of a cycle.
         | 
         | There are foods I would eat more if it was more available, like
         | salt cod was very common in an area I used to live (with a lot
         | of Portuguese ex-pats), but where I live now, it's only common
         | around Christmas (because demand from the Italian Americans I
         | live near now rise around this time). My buddy hunted an elk a
         | while back so I was flush with elk meat for a while and if it
         | was available and economical, I'd buy elk steaks from time to
         | time, just to change things up.
        
           | ajmurmann wrote:
           | Maybe domestication more than industrialization. Were there
           | other animal species that used to be more commonly grown by
           | farmers that disappeared with industrialization?
        
             | tfourb wrote:
             | Not disappeared but lost significance: goats, Camel, horses
             | (for meat), rabbits, eels, various poultry, and of course a
             | 99% reduction of the commercially grown varieties of pigs,
             | cows and chicken (now called ,,heritage breeds")
        
               | wizofaus wrote:
               | Goat meat is still eaten by 70% of the world's population
               | apparently - and perhaps surprisingly Australia is the
               | single largest exporter. But it's certainly a niche
               | market compared to the big 3. Even lamb/mutton is only
               | eaten at 1/6th the quantities of beef worldwide.
        
           | scythe wrote:
           | >salt cod was very common in an area I used to live
           | 
           | Cod was much more common _period_ prior to 1992.
        
             | jaipilot747 wrote:
             | What happened in 1992?
        
               | jhbadger wrote:
               | The Atlantic northwest cod population collapsed in that
               | year https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collapse_of_the_Atlant
               | ic_north...
        
               | aidenn0 wrote:
               | Which was a great boost to lobster populations (Cod prey
               | on lobster), we managed to over-fish those too though.
        
           | nonethewiser wrote:
           | >I think this is an obvious side effect of industrialization.
           | We got really good at factory farming chickens/cows/pigs/etc.
           | and catching/processing certain fish, like tuna, sardines,
           | salmon, etc. so that's the cheapest meat to get to market and
           | the cheapest to buy, so that's what we eat.
           | 
           | I think you're right, or at least it's a major reason.
           | 
           | Before this article I have also observed that the only wild
           | animals that people generally eat (at least in much of the
           | developed world) is seafood. Most other meat, for most
           | people, is farmed. Its not uncommon to eat fish that someone
           | caught from the ocean, but it is uncommon to eat a bird that
           | was shot out of the sky.
        
             | rcarr wrote:
             | Deer is pretty common because of hunting, especially in
             | America and probably Scotland too. Any wild animal that is
             | a problem is still eaten e.g kangaroo in Australia, boar in
             | Hawaii.
        
           | jessriedel wrote:
           | Right. Likewise, there are many unusual materials we could
           | make our houses out of, but for economic efficiency we mostly
           | make them out of some combination of wood, stone, clay,
           | steel, and chemical binders thereof.
        
         | retrocryptid wrote:
         | Well. Have you tasted possum or raccoon? They're pretty gamey.
        
           | kagevf wrote:
           | Just curious - have you tried rabbit, and would you consider
           | it to also be gamey?
        
             | dinkblam wrote:
             | rabbit is very tasteless (not unlike chicken) while hare is
             | quite "gamey"
        
         | tech_ken wrote:
         | As an aspirational, on/off vegetarian this always strikes me as
         | extremely funny. People (particularly the "omg BACON" mega-
         | carnivore types) get sooooo precious about certain types of
         | meat being "gross" or "weird", and it often has a particularly
         | racialized dimension (a lot of the COVID-19 stuff made this way
         | worse, IMO). To me it's like, meat is meat; so long as there's
         | no infectious organisms in it then it's really all the same
         | stuff and I'm going to eat it. Anyone who gets too picky about
         | what kind is acceptable to eat kind of needs to get over
         | themselves (IMHO). Sure the texture and flavor changes, and I
         | can respect people having some preference there, but if you're
         | going to wimp out over eating sweetbreads or horse then at the
         | very least you have to drop the "I eat MEAT, sorry if that
         | ///OFFENDS/// you" schtick.
        
         | thunkle wrote:
         | And within the few animals we only certain parts of those
         | animals
        
         | contingencies wrote:
         | That reminds me I have some kangaroo ("roo ragout") in the
         | fridge.
        
           | ardkf wrote:
           | How did you obtain it? I've been wanting to try it ever since
           | I missed the opportunity when on vacation in Australia as a
           | kid. But it's been difficult to find in the American Midwest.
        
             | contingencies wrote:
             | Had a little shindig on the weekend and a friend brought it
             | along. I don't usually buy much meat, but it's in
             | reasonable distribution here in Australia. You can also buy
             | emu and, I assume, crocodile. Once bought a farmed
             | crocodile at a market in China with a Kiwi friend. They
             | asked if we wanted it killed, we said yes, the next 15
             | minutes were horrible... they had a hell of a time
             | decapitating the thing with a cleaver then both the head
             | and the body kept walking around moving for another full
             | minute or so. Serious dinosaurs, like giant snake-chickens.
             | The meat isn't that tasty, tastes kind of like chewy
             | chicken, but it was a memorable.
        
         | mihaic wrote:
         | The same is actually true of plants. My grandparents ate many
         | different aromatic plants, and even had many different grains
         | they planted like buckwheat or millet.
        
         | TRiG_Ireland wrote:
         | There was actually a movement to find more animals to
         | domesticate. J. Draper dives into some fascinating history of
         | it, and also a discussion of how to read historical sources, in
         | this video on the man who ate the heart of a king:
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GmsP0zwAno.
        
         | wpietri wrote:
         | For sure. I've heard vegetarians call this idea complex
         | "carnitarianism". If you suggest to most Americans that they
         | eat dog or horse or elephant, they'll be horrified. But we're
         | perfectly comfortable with eating animals designated as food.
         | 
         | I live these contradictions myself. When I meet individual
         | cows, I'm often charmed. Or my friend keeps chickens that I
         | enjoy feeding when I'm over. I would have a hard time eating
         | the animals I had met, but I had a burger for dinner last night
         | without the slightest problem.
        
           | xattt wrote:
           | In the same way we, as a collective, ascribed value to
           | certain rocks and metals, certain living things have been
           | designated as edible.
           | 
           | There is beauty to a freshly cleaved piece of anthracite
           | (like your cow example), but an industrial pile of coal does
           | not.
        
           | aidenn0 wrote:
           | My sister and I used to play with lobsters on my
           | grandmother's sun-deck while we were waiting for the water to
           | boil.
        
           | boredemployee wrote:
           | While what you said is funny and made me laugh, I completely
           | relate.
        
           | rayiner wrote:
           | Bangladeshis often buy live cows to slaughter for Eid
           | celebrations. My cousin posted a picture of a live cow
           | chilling in their house, hanging out with their kids, etc. I
           | remember riding one around our yard (which was in the middle
           | of the city) and making friends with it.
           | 
           | People who live closer to the slaughtering process have a
           | more flexible view of the pet/food distinction.
        
           | gnrlst wrote:
           | That's because a burger has become its own "thing", far
           | removed from the "Cow". Like a chicken breast has become a
           | "thing". Also calling meat with a different name (beef vs cow
           | meat, pork vs pig meat, poultry, venison, etc) further
           | removes the animal from what's on your plate. It's like in
           | software, you use an OO language but you don't often stop to
           | thing what's happening behidn the scenes.
        
             | googlryas wrote:
             | Neither here nor there, but that "meat by a different name"
             | is most likely due to class divides in England after the
             | Norman conquest. The French(ish) speaking Normans were the
             | upper class getting the finished product, so the language
             | reflects that - beef(boeuf), pork(porc), and, a mostly
             | forgotten one, but poulet for chicken. Whereas the
             | farmers/lower classes - those dealing with the animals
             | themselves, were speaking Old English with Germanic derived
             | words - pig, cow, chicken.
        
           | Stratoscope wrote:
           | Twenty years ago, I lived in San Jose's Almaden Valley, a
           | block away from a dairy farm. On our walks around the
           | neighborhood, we used to pick hay and feed it to the cows.
           | 
           | One day, my daughter _named_ three of the cows: Treemore,
           | Chicken Nose, and Looneycake.
           | 
           | Chicken Nose had a pattern on her nose that looked like a
           | chicken. I don't remember what the other two names meant.
           | 
           | Around that same time, we went to a friend's barbecue. His
           | dad was a butcher, and he cooked the thickest steak I've ever
           | seen. It must have been two inches or more.
           | 
           | "Cooked" may be overstating it. When he brought in the steak
           | on a platter, it was all loose and jiggly, with blood
           | dripping out of it.
           | 
           | When I asked him about it, he said "That's not blood. It's
           | juice!"
           | 
           | I kind of lost my taste for beef after that. Pork too.
           | 
           | But some exceptions apply. I don't enjoy a hamburger or a
           | pork chop, but on occasion I would have a hot dog or a piece
           | of crisp bacon.
           | 
           | I guess if the meat is disguised enough I don't mind it as
           | much?
        
             | Bjartr wrote:
             | To add detail for the curious:
             | 
             | Blood is hemoglobin, and circulates the body, delivering
             | oxygen to where its needed. Whereas the "juice" from a
             | piece of cooked meat is myoglobin, stores oxygen inside
             | muscle cells until needed, and is responsible for the red
             | color of meat in general.
        
             | AlotOfReading wrote:
             | He was right. One of the first steps of slaughtering is
             | draining the blood. There isn't much left by the time it
             | gets to the butcher. The red liquid you see after cooking
             | red meat is myoglobin, which lives inside the muscle tissue
             | itself as opposed to the vascular system. It also turns
             | blood-red in the presence of oxygen.
        
           | skc wrote:
           | Yes, and in fact cultures that place fewer limits on what
           | animals are edible are probably the sane ones (or at least
           | logically consistent ones), and not the "weird" ones.
        
           | protoman3000 wrote:
           | You don't have to eat what you don't like. However, you could
           | (un-)train yourself to like what you didn't like before.
           | 
           | Over the lifetime our cognition, through conditioning,
           | accumulates or eliminated emotional associations with things.
           | E.g. the common person from our culture that didn't know they
           | were eating a dog would have a visceral physiological
           | response to the associated disgust their brain launches once
           | they were told that in fact they ate the dog.
           | 
           | And it's okay, these associations exist and people have
           | initially little control over them.
           | 
           | But people in cultures other than ours don't have this
           | association conditioned, and for them it's perfectly fine to
           | eat dog.
           | 
           | This shows that this is just a thing in the head, not
           | physiological. I used to be together with a farmer girl and
           | she saw and raised a cow with her father from it's beginning
           | until it's meat ended in her stomach as chewed through juicy
           | steak.
           | 
           | Who's "right" here? Nobody, it is what it is. Everything is
           | possible.
        
           | BagelGuy wrote:
           | Cognitive Dissonance is a powerful force.
        
         | jldugger wrote:
         | Domestication is hard work, yall.
        
           | wizofaus wrote:
           | It is, but it's already been done for many animals that
           | simply haven't had the levels of industrialisation of meat
           | production applied to them as have beef/chicken/pork.
        
       | h4l wrote:
       | I wonder if this has anything do with how bad his health was?
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_of_Charles_Darwin
        
         | bitwize wrote:
         | The fact that he let a kissing bug bite him didn't help...
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | GloriousKoji wrote:
       | It was an era of science where the easiest way to observe an
       | animal up close in detail was to first shoot it with a gun. Makes
       | you appreciate how far we've come with things like high speed
       | cameras, batteries for record length, gps tracking and precision
       | optics.
        
         | sethhochberg wrote:
         | The anecdote from the article about Darwin realizing, mid meal,
         | that the bird the ship's cook had prepared for him actually had
         | research value and running off to salvage parts from the
         | kitchen is almost darkly hilarious - must have been crazy to be
         | doing research at a time when someone serves up the thing
         | you're looking for, not knowing anything about its significance
         | or why you're there
        
           | earthscienceman wrote:
           | If you think that's a strictly historical phenomena you're
           | underestimating how humanity operates. I done research
           | cruises in the Arctic and there was multiple instances of the
           | ships crew not realizing, understanding, or caring about the
           | scientific mission. Instances like samples being naively
           | destroyed because why would someone put tubes of ice in the
           | overflow freezer, etc etc.
           | 
           | Funny enough, I'm not too critical of it. I can't drive or
           | operate a ship. Humanity is a bunch of disparate people
           | trying to accomplish things together and sometimes it leads
           | to very funny scenarios.
        
       | dang wrote:
       | We changed the URL from https://www.thefactsite.com/charles-
       | darwin-eating-habits/ to something hopefully less spammy.
       | 
       | Related and possibly of interest:
       | 
       | https://beagleproject.wordpress.com/2014/01/04/having-dinner...
        
       | wpietri wrote:
       | It's been a long time since I read _Twenty Thousand Leagues Under
       | the Sea_ , but one of the things that struck me at the time was
       | how concerned the narrator was with how everything tasted. It was
       | released 10 years after _On the Origin of Species_ , so I imagine
       | we had yet to develop a food supply stable and generous enough
       | that most people would be happy to let all that good protein just
       | keep wandering around in the wilderness. As the line goes, "If
       | God did not intend for us to eat animals, then why did he make
       | them out of meat?"
        
         | tough wrote:
         | We're made of meat too tho...
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | supazek wrote:
           | Speak for yourself
        
           | tw04 wrote:
           | And there's more than one culture that applied that rule to
           | us.
        
             | PakG1 wrote:
             | And a number of pathological individuals within cultures
             | that don't apply that rule to us.
        
           | DonHopkins wrote:
           | To paraphrase Flanders and Swan: "If God didn't mean for poor
           | people to eat rich people, he wouldn't have made them of
           | meat."
           | 
           | Flanders and Swan: The Reluctant Cannibal:
           | 
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjAHw2DEBgw
        
             | fsckboy wrote:
             | I guess a play on Jonathan Swift's 1729 _A Modest Proposal
             | For preventing the Children of Poor People From being a
             | Burthen to Their Parents or Country, and For making them
             | Beneficial to the Publick_
        
           | miah_ wrote:
           | Some people eat people. There was a guy who had a foot
           | amputation and made it into taco's for his friends.
        
           | rsapkf wrote:
           | They're Made out of Meat: https://www.mit.edu/people/dpolicar
           | /writing/prose/text/think...
        
             | 2023throwawayy wrote:
             | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6JFTmQCFHg&t=360s
        
       | jonny_eh wrote:
       | I wonder if eating something he shouldn't have contributed to his
       | mystery illness later in life.
        
         | mat_epice wrote:
         | One theory with a lot of evidence behind it is that he was a
         | combination of lactose intolerant and depressed.
         | 
         | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1743237/pdf/v08...
        
         | zingababba wrote:
         | Was wondering the same thing.
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_of_Charles_Darwin
        
       | galuvian wrote:
       | This lines up with how it took 300 years for the giant tortoise
       | to receive a scientific name. The process to get this required
       | delivering a specimen back to England, and they were just too
       | delicious.
        
         | _whiteCaps_ wrote:
         | QI had some great discussions on this:
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPggB4MfPnk
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsoWLFbnFIk
        
           | Symbiote wrote:
           | Is it true? There are museum record of skeletons from the
           | early 19th century, which is around the right time, and there
           | are Latin names from around then too.
        
       | dakr wrote:
       | The encyclopedic CRC handbook used to (maybe still does?) list
       | what different metals, minerals, and other materials taste like.
       | It seems a lot of people felt taste was an important sense to
       | make use of.
        
       | rjsw wrote:
       | My high school biology teacher did research on the slime on the
       | skin of trout. He said that he didn't finish the PhD but ate well
       | during it.
        
       | mistrial9 wrote:
       | Is this related at all to the history of eating whale meat?
        
       | alexmolas wrote:
       | Plot twist: he didn't travel the world to discover new species
       | and advance science, but just to try new flavors and eat strange
       | animals
        
         | macjohnmcc wrote:
         | He traveled on his stomach.
        
       | gold7777 wrote:
       | It could explain his poor health.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-08-28 23:01 UTC)