[HN Gopher] What's the case for naturally mined diamonds anymore?
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       What's the case for naturally mined diamonds anymore?
        
       Author : ramsj
       Score  : 20 points
       Date   : 2023-08-26 18:09 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.ft.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.ft.com)
        
       | archo wrote:
       | https://archive.is/O3D8o
        
         | mcdirty wrote:
         | Thank you. So many pay wall links these days.
        
       | xhkkffbf wrote:
       | I bought a pair of 7mm diamonds that are said to be made with
       | chemical vapor deposition. They're very nice and very cheap, at
       | least relative to the mined diamonds. If anything, they're too
       | perfect. The natural ones are imperfect in the way that real wood
       | siding is less perfect than vinyl siding on a house.
        
       | mvnuweucxqokii wrote:
       | > "People don't buy Swiss watches to tell the time," he said.
       | "Apple probably sells more watches than the entire Swiss watch
       | industry but does that matter if they've grown during that
       | period?"
       | 
       | Exactly. That diamonds are expensive is almost the entire point.
       | If it becomes possible to buy artificial diamond rings for like
       | $50, the tradition will disappear entirely. People will find some
       | other signaling act.
        
         | sealeck wrote:
         | At least there is some aesthetic difference between a Swiss
         | watch and an Apple Watch.
        
         | cjs_ac wrote:
         | Here's one for PS15: https://www.argos.co.uk/product/7627747
        
         | tempestn wrote:
         | There's bias even in that wording though. They're not
         | "artificial" diamonds. They're real diamonds, grown in a lab
         | instead of in the ground.
         | 
         | Agreed with your broader point though. IIRC there's an
         | economics term for this--goods that don't follow the standard
         | supply/demand price curve, but where increasing price actually
         | increases demand over some range. Ah, "Veblen" goods,
         | apparently.
        
         | ramsj wrote:
         | If people move on to some other form of signaling that is less
         | exploitative (of people and the environment), great!
        
           | yrwelikethis wrote:
           | Potentially a fair point vis a vis the environment, but it's
           | not really true of people as far as DeBeers is concerned. I
           | know people that work for them in Botswana and I hear nothing
           | but good things about them as an employer. On the
           | environment, Kimberlites are pretty small and the
           | environmental impact of primary diamond mining isn't really
           | that great in the grand scheme of things. Take this with a
           | pinch of salt from a guy on the internet sharing some
           | anecdata etc etc.
        
             | ramsj wrote:
             | De Beers is only ~25% of total annual carats of diamonds
             | mined.
        
           | mvnuweucxqokii wrote:
           | Fair point!
        
       | mytailorisrich wrote:
       | A diamond manufactured becomes a product like any other, an
       | iPhone, a TV, whatever.
       | 
       | There is something more profound with holding a stone that was
       | forged deep in the Earth and somehow mined from there, too, even
       | if chemically it's the exact same thing.
        
         | ramsj wrote:
         | I'm too utilitarian to see the distinction, but I guess that
         | feeling is valid in others.
        
       | boppo1 wrote:
       | The DeBeers marketing is still effective and most (US at least)
       | women still want them for their romantic authenticity. I suspect
       | this will be unpopular, but I know many of my married buddies
       | would likely not be if they had insisted and held firm that a lab
       | grown diamond is just as good. Doctors, lawyers, tech guys.
        
         | brnt wrote:
         | I exclusively hear this from US folks. Would love to see a
         | breakdown of where DeBeers makes its money. Frankly I can't
         | imagine anyone I know caring about this.
        
         | sealeck wrote:
         | I would not marry anyone who given the option of buying thing A
         | @ X units of currency/kg and a chemically identical version of
         | thing A @ 3X units of currency/kg would pick the option which
         | is 3 times more expensive for the sole reason of "status".
        
           | jiggawatts wrote:
           | Yeah, that's an easy thing to say. Try saying that to the
           | love of your life and see how that works out for you.
        
           | Red_Leaves_Flyy wrote:
           | Some people have been trying to make inclusions the new fetch
           | which is stupid since if are so much better. Diamond does
           | have superiority something like moassinite but the cost
           | differential is way more than 3x for minor differences in
           | wearability.
        
           | aaron695 wrote:
           | [dead]
        
         | xhkkffbf wrote:
         | A smart woman would realize that every dollar spent on a
         | diamond is a dollar that can't be spent on home improvements,
         | cars, clothing etc.
        
         | analog31 wrote:
         | Glad I married a scientist. ;-)
        
       | akomtu wrote:
       | Diamonds are NFTs of the real world.
        
         | ramsj wrote:
         | I lol'd at this! Pretty accurate.
        
       | yieldcrv wrote:
       | Network effects from other women
       | 
       | At least in the consumer world
       | 
       | Glad to read thats changing
        
       | more_corn wrote:
       | None?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-08-26 23:02 UTC)