[HN Gopher] Easy-ISLisp: ISLisp interpreter/compiler
___________________________________________________________________
Easy-ISLisp: ISLisp interpreter/compiler
Author : rcarmo
Score : 42 points
Date : 2023-08-24 15:44 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (github.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (github.com)
| BaculumMeumEst wrote:
| the project's stated goal is:
|
| "I hope that Lisp will become more popular. I hope many people
| enjoy it. EISL aims to be user-friendly."
|
| other lisps work towards a similar goal. racket, for example,
| has:
|
| - a large standard library
|
| - extensive documentation
|
| - a full-fledged IDE built in the language including a visual
| step debugger
|
| - a package manager supplying a large ecosystem of community
| libraries
|
| - numerous introductory programming books written about the
| language, and the language includes a compatibility mode for SICP
|
| in what ways is Easy-ISLisp an improvement in terms of user-
| friendliness?
| wduquette wrote:
| Racket's got lots of interesting features; but it seems to be
| focused on teaching and programming language experimentation.
| Does anyone use Racket in production? (Genuinely curious.)
| soegaard wrote:
| Yes.
| Conscat wrote:
| Whenever someone asks this, inevitably Naughty Dog comes up.
| https://youtu.be/oSmqbnhHp1c?si=CJU8-cAQB17mHQUg
| zelphirkalt wrote:
| If I had to guess, perhaps it is friendly because the code is
| mostly portable between various lisps? At least that seems to
| be its mission according to [1].
|
| [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISLISP
| wduquette wrote:
| I looked at the names of the available ISLISP
| implementations; none of them appear in the list of popular,
| commonly used LISP implementations. I have to wonder where
| (and if!) any implementation of ISLISP is actually being used
| in practice.
| [deleted]
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-08-25 23:02 UTC)