[HN Gopher] Is Computer Hacking a Crime? (1989) [pdf]
___________________________________________________________________
Is Computer Hacking a Crime? (1989) [pdf]
Author : solomonb
Score : 33 points
Date : 2023-08-24 13:19 UTC (9 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (faculty.weber.edu)
(TXT) w3m dump (faculty.weber.edu)
| forinti wrote:
| They still hadn't had to ponder the possibility of it being
| illegal to hack stuff (you think) you own.
|
| The law expands to allow capitalism to grow.
| barbariangrunge wrote:
| Not since the hackers discovered you could just put up a eula or
| privacy policy first
| Terr_ wrote:
| "By continuing to use this Awesomely Pwned Machine you agree to
| hold blameless and indemnify Leet Haxor from any past
| inconvenience..."
| tptacek wrote:
| John Perry Barlow, from this transcript: "Driving 110 miles per
| hour on Main Street is a common symptom of rural adolescence,
| publicly denounced but privately understood."
| NoMoreNicksLeft wrote:
| I thought the CFAA was 1986ish. That anyone could believe it up
| for debate in 1989 is a little silly... or did it take a couple
| decades of case law to give CFAA teeth?
| tptacek wrote:
| This is a normative discussion, not a positive one.
| solomonb wrote:
| In Fred Turner's "From Counterculture to Cyberculture", Turner
| contrasts the perspectives of John Perry Barlow and Lee
| Felsenstein as the old guard of cybernetic counterculturalists
| versus Acid Phreak and Fiber optik as the new guard of modern
| hackers:
|
| > When they joined the discussion on the WELL, Phreak and Optik
| immediately set off a culture clash. The conflict could be seen
| clearly in the edited version of the forum eventually printed in
| Harper's. Like the online forum, and like it's predecessor, The
| Hackers' Conference of 1984, the conversation opened with a
| discussion of the hacker ethic. WELL regulars described the ethic
| in cybernetic and countercultural terms familiar to their online
| colleagues. Lee Felsenstein compared hackers to the "Angelheaded
| hipsters" of Allen Ginsberg's poem "Howl." John Perry Barlow
| described them as solitary inventors designing a system through
| which humans woule acquire the simultaneous unity of other
| "collective organisms." Acid Phreak would have none of it. "There
| is no one hacker ethic," he wrote. "Everyone has his own. To say
| that we all think the same way is preposterous." Among WELL
| regulars like Felsenstein and Barlow, hackers were cybernetic
| counter-culturalists, creatures devoted to establishing a new,
| more open culture by any electronic means necessary. For Acid
| Phreak, the hackers were break-in artists devoted to exploring
| and exploiting weaknesses in closed and especially corporate
| systems.
|
| I would be really interested to hear how the perspectives of the
| surviving participants in this conversation have evolved.
| factorymoo wrote:
| Interesting to see the perspectives from early hacking pioneers.
| Seems like some things haven't changed much - debates over ethics
| of unauthorized access, whether it's criminal, free speech
| implications, etc. But more nuance now as hacking's gone more
| mainstream.
|
| Biggest change is probably threat models. In 1990 main concern
| was individuals hacking systems for challenge, curiosity, etc.
| Today it's nation-states and organized crime using hacking for
| financial gain, espionage, even kinetic attacks.
|
| Other change is commercialization/professionalization of hacking.
| Now huge industry around cybersecurity, ethical hacking, bug
| bounties. Hacking skills lead to lucrative careers, not just
| hobby or activism.
|
| More diversity today too - no longer just male techies. But part
| of cyberpunk spirit remains, even as hacking's become bigger
| business and political issue.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-08-24 23:00 UTC)