[HN Gopher] Effects of natural and artificial light on man and o...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Effects of natural and artificial light on man and other living
       things (1973)
        
       Author : walterbell
       Score  : 35 points
       Date   : 2023-08-22 06:31 UTC (16 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (archive.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (archive.org)
        
       | blueyes wrote:
       | This book dates from 1973. Its author John Nash was born in 1909.
       | 
       | At the risk of being _that guy_ , Huberman has a great episode on
       | how lights, both natural and artificial can affect your health,
       | supported by more recent science:
       | 
       | https://hubermanlab.com/using-light-sunlight-blue-light-and-...
       | 
       | https://hubermanlab.com/using-light-for-health/
       | 
       | Turns out we are creatures who have a daily rhythm regulated by
       | the sun, and lots of things like hormones, wakefulness and sleep
       | work better when we act accordingly.
        
         | dang wrote:
         | Year fixed above. Thanks!
        
         | sureglymop wrote:
         | At the risk of being that guy also, what are Hubermans
         | credentials and why is he a credible source? As someone who is
         | _not_ a listener, he seems to be a Rogan-esque podcaster with a
         | PhD, who makes a lot of bold and some possibly unsubstantiated
         | claims, producing content marketed as  "self-help". Is this a
         | correct assessment? This isn't a criticism, I am genuinely
         | trying to find out. If you are a regular listener I would
         | welcome your opinion.
        
           | blueyes wrote:
           | Huberman has a PhD in neurobiology and teaches that
           | discipline at a top-tier institution (Stanford), where he
           | also runs a lab. He's published several articles in Nature, a
           | top science journal. His subspecialty happens to be vision,
           | which includes how light affects the eyes and brain. So his
           | expertise is particularly strong in this regard. I happen to
           | trust his judgment on many other aspects of neurobiology, and
           | have been a regular listener since he began his podcast. His
           | advice and insights have changed my life in many positive
           | ways; that is, I do many of the things he recommends and I
           | feel healthier, calmer and more energetic because of it. His
           | 2.5 hour podcasts run a bit long and he does not know how to
           | condense his message well. That's the main downside, but if
           | you can find synopses of transcripts, or just play him at
           | 1.5x speed, you can save some time.
           | 
           | * https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=and
           | r...
        
           | wddkcs wrote:
           | You know he has a PhD but don't find that credible? I've seen
           | Huberman smeared recently, don't understand why. Quick search
           | shows he works at Stanford.
        
             | sureglymop wrote:
             | I in no way meant to smear, I asked for opinions. I find it
             | personally very hard to judge the credibility of any
             | content online these days. Also no, a PhD is just a title,
             | nothing more. I would say when it comes to research, what
             | matters (applicable in some fields) is transparency and
             | reproducibility. The work often should speak for itself,
             | regardless of any titles. Do you find the idea that there
             | could be a PhD who would publish pseudo-science farfetched?
             | Or what about someone without any title publishing a ground
             | breaking paper? Reality is more complex than attended
             | institution and acquired title. Still, I wasn't smearing
             | anyone.
        
       | marcinreal wrote:
       | Recently I got some anti mosquito candles. They didn't really
       | work for the intended purpose, but they had the unexpected effect
       | of making me sleepy in the evening. So I stopped using
       | electronics and artificial lighting at night and use candles
       | instead, and my sleep has greatly improved. Nothing else ever
       | worked for my mild insomnia.
        
         | theultdev wrote:
         | You don't have black soot everywhere?
         | 
         | For outside you put Citronella torches around your area, so the
         | smoke makes a perimeter. Take account of wind direction and
         | speed.
         | 
         | Then a candle in the middle for the interior. The candle won't
         | do as much as torches since it doesn't produce enough smoke.
         | 
         | They don't stop mosquitoes but they lessen the effect. Instead
         | of 30 bites an hour you may get 1 or 2.
        
           | marcinreal wrote:
           | Thanks, good to know. I had two citronella candles next to me
           | but I guess it wasn't enough for the mosquitoes. I haven't
           | had a problem with soot, maybe it depends on the kind of
           | candle, and I only blow them out outside.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-08-22 23:02 UTC)