[HN Gopher] AI art can't earn copyright, judge rules
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       AI art can't earn copyright, judge rules
        
       Author : SleekEagle
       Score  : 14 points
       Date   : 2023-08-21 19:00 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (thehill.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (thehill.com)
        
       | 1vuio0pswjnm7 wrote:
       | Your browser appears to have Javascript disabled.             For
       | instructions on how to enable Javascript please click here.
       | If you have any issues, please contact us at
       | challengehelp@humansecurity.com
       | 
       | No Javascript is required.
       | 
       | https://web.archive.org/web/20230821190137if_/https://thehil...
        
       | preommr wrote:
       | The whole situation is confusing enough without this trash making
       | things worse.
       | 
       | > with the Creativity Machine identified as the author and
       | himself as the "work-for-hire to the owner of the Creativity
       | Machine."
       | 
       | How on earth is a machine going to get copyright priveleges? Is a
       | machine going to sue if the copyright is infringed? Complete and
       | utter nonsense.
       | 
       | The much more serious discussion is about if someone can just
       | type a prompt and then have the copyright to what the ai outputs.
       | That's the main question. Instead, this case keeps getting
       | brought up and lets people mistakenly claim that 'ai art can't be
       | copyrighted' as if it's a settled issue altogether.
        
       | artninja1988 wrote:
       | Good. Down with copyright and parents
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-08-21 23:02 UTC)