[HN Gopher] The Next New Thing: Venture Capital Stories
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Next New Thing: Venture Capital Stories
        
       Author : andsoitis
       Score  : 17 points
       Date   : 2023-08-20 14:16 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (computerhistory.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (computerhistory.org)
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | spaceguillotine wrote:
       | I see the growth of VC backed companies leading to the downfall
       | of stable 20 year career path and loyalty to employee quality of
       | life with everyone chasing this lottery model of hitting it big
       | using VC money and selling out the company with an idea and
       | exploiting more and more people to get it done.
       | 
       | How much of this innovation is baed on tech that was created and
       | funded with public money and gov grants and then privatized when
       | it became commercial and profitable. Sure seems like we stopped
       | advancing the science of the commons when VCs started growing in
       | the 80s along with bank deregulation.
        
         | cscurmudgeon wrote:
         | Stable 20 year career paths are only possible with stable and
         | large rent seeking companies under some form of govt.
         | protection or crony capitalism.
         | 
         | > How much of this innovation is baed on tech that was created
         | and funded with public money and gov grants and then privatized
         | when it became commercial and profitable
         | 
         | Very little compared to the amount that goes in after
         | privatization. Also look at the alternative, if the govt
         | prevents commercialization even if a single cent of public
         | money is invested, there will be lesser businesses, lesser
         | jobs, etc.
         | 
         | > > How much of this innovation is baed on tech that was
         | created and funded with public money and gov grants and then
         | privatized when it became commercial and profitable
         | 
         | It is strange to take this stance. Because it can be asked the
         | other way too.
         | 
         | How much of that govt money initially came from taxes from
         | those that businesses paid?
         | 
         | https://www.businessroundtable.org/archive/media/news-releas...
         | 
         | Always think of second-order effects (e.g. Canada now asking
         | Meta to allow news back on its site).
        
         | nico wrote:
         | > How much of this innovation is baed on tech that was created
         | and funded with public money and gov grants and then privatized
         | when it became commercial and profitable
         | 
         | Or built on top of open source that then was never
         | contributed/donated back to
        
         | burlesona wrote:
         | I think this has only been the case for the dark ages after the
         | Great Recession where we were stuck at zero percent interest.
         | Zero percent interest breaks a lot of the economy because it
         | means there is basically nothing prudent you can do with your
         | cash, it either wastes away to inflation or you have to gamble
         | with it. So everyone started gambling, and one manifestation of
         | this was a surge of very questionable VC-backed companies with
         | no real business model.
         | 
         | If the US will use fiscal policy to err on the side of over-
         | stimulating rather than under-stimulating going forward, as it
         | has in the COVID aftermath, we can keep the natural rate of
         | interest positive and the whole economy (including VC) will be
         | a lot healthier.
        
           | shrimpx wrote:
           | > questionable VC-backed companies with no real business
           | model
           | 
           | The gig economy is the poster child for this new style of VC.
        
       | choppaface wrote:
       | "let me know how I can be helpful"
       | 
       | This take on VC history is incredibly specious and reads like a
       | bunch of country club boys taking advantage of the CH writer's
       | "unbiased" tone because they couldn't get their edits approved in
       | Wikipedia.
       | 
       | Missing from the story:
       | 
       | * Radar and stealth development and US Gov investment in
       | Stanford, MIT, etc, that predates much of the VC comments in this
       | article. US Taxpayers made a huge investment in SV.
       | 
       | * It touches on Apple but totally ignores Steve Jobs relationship
       | with the Apple Board
       | 
       | * Modern textbook examples of VC Boardroom greed e.g. Pets.com,
       | Broadcast.com, Paypal, Uber, Wework, etc etc SPACS especially
       | 
       | * The move to megacap Founder-owned companies E.g. Facebook,
       | Airbnb, Snap, Google. Historically these examples cement the
       | relative uselessness of VCs in internet endeavors that are much
       | less capital-intensive vs hardware.
       | 
       | It's a decent article on how VCs _see themselves as being
       | helpful_ but an unabashed sign that the biases of the Computer
       | History Museum.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-08-20 23:01 UTC)