[HN Gopher] Part-DB: open-source inventory management system for...
___________________________________________________________________
Part-DB: open-source inventory management system for your
electronic components
Author : thunderbong
Score : 101 points
Date : 2023-08-16 13:23 UTC (3 days ago)
(HTM) web link (github.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (github.com)
| junon wrote:
| Neat. I wrote my own set of SQLite-based scripts for this and one
| of the things I'd miss using Part-DB is the ability to import
| BOMs to 1) see if I have all the parts (maybe they support this
| but I didn't see it in the docs) and 2) use a BOM and a barcode
| scanner to source a bunch of parts with audible feedback about if
| a part I just scanned is indeed something I need, and to tell me
| (audibly) when I've scanned every part I need.
| InTheArena wrote:
| [flagged]
| BadrB wrote:
| How does it compare to Inventree
| (https://docs.inventree.org/en/latest/)?
| digitalblade wrote:
| Bom import is available for KiCAD BOM list
| https://github.com/Part-DB/Part-DB-server/issues/202
| jwr wrote:
| PartsBox founder here. I get asked about this sometimes, so I'll
| answer here: I'm quite happy with open-source solutions appearing
| in the same problem space. I bought ECDB, but left the open-
| source software available on GitHub for anyone who wishes to take
| it further. My software will not be open-source for a number of
| reasons, most importantly I cannot afford to take on the chores
| of a project leader/maintainer. That said, I'm all for diversity,
| and happy to see others stepping in.
|
| PartsBox (https://partsbox.com/) is and will remain free for
| hobbyists and makers. It takes quite a bit of effort to keep it
| that way (data sources aren't free!), but I am a hobbyist myself,
| and keeping a free version around was always one of my strategic
| goals. I don't have VCs breathing down my neck and clamoring for
| "hockey-puck growth", so I can keep it that way.
| Corsome wrote:
| > My software will not be open-source for a number of reasons,
|
| Just to clarify which exact software is not open source?
| PartsBox looks to be AGPL.
|
| > In-browser camera scanning is available in commercial plans
| only (due to licensing costs).
|
| I wonder if you checked out https://developer.mozilla.org/en-
| US/docs/Web/API/Barcode_Det...
| phpisthebest wrote:
| I think you are confusing the original Link (Parts-DB) which
| is AGPL, with the grand parent, PartsBox a different project
| in the same space, and is not AGPL
| Corsome wrote:
| Ah, right. Indeed, the naming is super similar. Thanks for
| mentioning that PartsBox is not open source.
| distract8901 wrote:
| Nitpick: your site has some annoyances in a mobile browser.
| Clicking links seems to drop me at the bottom of the new page
| instead of scrolling to the top. Some elements render off
| screen, and in particular the text formatting inside the live
| demo is very bad. On the projects page, I get a column of text
| about 6 characters wide, and some button labels seem to be
| missing.
|
| Otherwise, this looks like something I desperately need at
| work. I'm particularly excited about the barcode scanning.
| Inputting stock is the hardest part about using a system like
| this, and this is an elegant solution.
|
| The user count is a lot lower than I'd have thought. I work for
| a startup, and we have two engineers, two assembly techs, two
| purchasing managers, and several other people who would need
| read access. That's already more than your largest package. I
| don't understand why the limits are so low unless you're
| expecting people to have shared accounts like 'engineering',
| 'production', and 'purchasing'.
|
| I'll have to give this a try sometime! It sounds super
| promising
| unwind wrote:
| "Hockey-stick" though, right?
| sheepshear wrote:
| Your guest appearance on The Amp Hour podcast was the first
| time I heard about PartsBox and I've been using it ever since.
|
| https://theamphour.com/542-component-management-with-jan-ryc...
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2023-08-19 23:01 UTC)