[HN Gopher] Carl Linnaeus Set Out to Label All of Life
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Carl Linnaeus Set Out to Label All of Life
        
       Author : Petiver
       Score  : 39 points
       Date   : 2023-08-15 02:22 UTC (20 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.newyorker.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.newyorker.com)
        
       | klenwell wrote:
       | E.O. Wilson does a wonderful job in the opening of his book
       | Consilience illustrating the philosophical tension between the
       | Realists (Linnaeans) and Nominalists (Darwinists) that the New
       | Yorker reviewer zeroes in on:
       | 
       |  _My intellectual world was framed by Linnaeus, the eighteenth-
       | century Swedish naturalist who invented modern biological
       | classification. The Linnaean system is deceptively easy. You
       | start by separating specimens of plants and animals into species.
       | Then you sort species resembling one another into groups, the
       | genera. Examples of such groups are all the crows and all the
       | oaks. Next you label each species with a two-part Latinized name,
       | such as Corvus ossifragus for the fish crow, where Corvus stands
       | for the genus--all the species of crows--and ossifragus for the
       | fish crow in particular. Then on to higher classification, where
       | similar genera are grouped into families, families into orders,
       | and so on up to phyla and finally, at the very summit, the six
       | kingdoms--plants, animals, fungi, protists, monerans, and
       | archaea. It is like the army: men (plus women, nowadays) into
       | squads, squads into platoons, platoons into companies, and in the
       | final aggregate, the armed services headed by the joint chiefs of
       | staff. It is, in other words, a conceptual world made for the
       | mind of an eighteen-year-old.
       | 
       | I had reached the level of the Carolus Linnaeus of 1735 or, more
       | accurately (since at that time I knew little of the Swedish
       | master), the Roger Tory Peterson of 1934, when the great
       | naturalist published the first edition of A Field Guide to the
       | Birds. My Linnaean period was nonetheless a good start for a
       | scientific career. The first step to wisdom, as the Chinese say,
       | is getting things by their right names.
       | 
       | Then I discovered evolution. Suddenly--that is not too strong a
       | word--I saw the world in a wholly new way. This epiphany I owed
       | to my mentor Ralph Chermock, an intense, chain-smoking young
       | assistant professor newly arrived in the provinces with a Ph.D.
       | in entomology from Cornell University. After listening to me
       | natter for a while about my lofty goal of classifying all the
       | ants of Alabama, he handed me a copy of Ernst Mayr's 1942
       | Systematics and the Origin of Species. Read it, he said, if you
       | want to become a real biologist._
        
         | arisbe__ wrote:
         | > "if you want to be come a real biologist"
         | 
         | I love Wilson and in particular his prose, but he never himself
         | seemed to get very far into any sort of "understanding" type of
         | consilience himself (he was a professional scientist after
         | all).
         | 
         | Your quote from him reads like someone looking back on a past
         | personal realization of a significant paradigm shift and
         | expansion of perspective when they are themselves at the same
         | time already of a bygone era blindly living in a lower
         | dimension (as are most).
        
           | Angostura wrote:
           | What was the nature of lower dimension he was trapped in, in
           | your opinion?
        
         | lordgrenville wrote:
         | For anyone curious to hear more (or a bit confused by this, as
         | I was), this is a helpful primer:
         | https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/natural-kinds/#NatuKindRe...
        
       | anoncow wrote:
       | What would Linnaeus be today? I can imagine him tweeting his
       | discoveries and a YouTube channel.
        
         | mdp2021 wrote:
         | There existed profiles, and certainly they still survive, in
         | relative shadow, that were more interested in their own
         | solitary focused activity.
         | 
         | Divulgation is a separate activity from research.
        
         | contingencies wrote:
         | Probably distinguished faculty at some second-rate tertiary
         | institution mired in paper milling, taking out frustration as a
         | volunteer taxonomist at iNaturalist.
        
         | eichin wrote:
         | "sponsor my channel and get 3 species named after you!"
        
       | naillo wrote:
       | You can just smell that this is a book ad from the title
        
         | jrussino wrote:
         | http://paulgraham.com/submarine.html
         | 
         | For as many times as I have read and re-read that essay, I find
         | that I still need to be reminded just how pervasive this sort
         | of thing is.
        
         | klenwell wrote:
         | I take it you didn't sniff any deeper. From the text:
         | 
         |  _Gunnar Broberg's biography dutifully accompanies Linnaeus
         | every step of the way, trekking through his life for four-
         | hundred-plus pages. These are not, unfortunately, a pleasure to
         | read... The main problem with "The Man Who Loved Nature,"
         | though, is not all the things in it we don't need to know but
         | all the things we need to know that aren't in it._
         | 
         | It's a book review.
        
         | tempaway47811 wrote:
         | _A new biography, "The Man Who Organized Nature" (Princeton),
         | written by Gunnar Broberg and translated from the Swedish by
         | Anna Paterson, attempts to provide the fullest possible account
         | of his life yet fails to grapple with the fundamental question
         | it raises: if categorization is crucial to making sense of the
         | world, how should we classify Carl Linnaeus?_
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | madcaptenor wrote:
         | The New Yorker runs a lot of these, it's not a secret.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-08-15 23:01 UTC)