[HN Gopher] Publish Everything (Pretty Much)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Publish Everything (Pretty Much)
        
       Author : KentBeck
       Score  : 63 points
       Date   : 2023-08-10 14:34 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (tidyfirst.substack.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (tidyfirst.substack.com)
        
       | Decabytes wrote:
       | I too write a Substack and I have also experienced this. There
       | have been articles that I've written that have out performed my
       | expectations, articles that I was sure would do well and flopped,
       | articles that didn't do well when I initially posted, then
       | suddenly receive a lot of traffic a few months later due to a
       | share, etc.
       | 
       | Very rarely do I write an article, know it will go viral, and
       | then have it do well. It's still hard when I have a string of bad
       | weeks where nothing does well, because I still want to grow my
       | audience and viewership. I have to remind myself that I started
       | writing because I just desperately wanted to see a certain type
       | of content put out into this world. This means that there are
       | lots of times I write about things I know won't do well ( a
       | history about BSD, a tutorial about using xml with C#). As my
       | readership grows it can be hard to write those types of articles,
       | but I'm trying to stay true to myself.
       | 
       | Most of the time writing is fun, but there are definitely weeks
       | were it's hard to feel inspired. But for some reason for me
       | writing just feels like breathing. It's something I have to do,
       | even if I don't always enjoy it.
        
       | bluGill wrote:
       | Publish where? The article says twitter which is designed for
       | short not in depth discussion. (And some questionable politics)
        
       | Karellen wrote:
       | Took me a while to parse that headline. I was trying to figure
       | out what "land-publishing" was.
       | 
       | I realise that most typographic style guides recommend not
       | putting spaces around em-dashes which separate clauses in a
       | sentence, but I always have trouble distinguishing between em-
       | dashes and hyphens in most fonts. As a result, I often mistake
       | non-spaced em-dashed clauses with hyphenated words, leading to
       | confusion.
       | 
       | I note that the original article does not use the word "land"
       | anywhere at all; not in the title, nor the body. The un-
       | editorialised headline "Publish Everything (Pretty Much)" is
       | (IMO) much clearer.
        
         | pwdisswordfishc wrote:
         | Except that's an en-dash, not an em-dash. So it's still
         | confusing even if you can distinguish the latter from a hyphen.
         | 
         | Though it's only Android fonts that make hyphen the same length
         | as the en-dash.
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | 23B1 wrote:
       | I won't be publishing any of my writing publicly until there's a
       | way to insure it isn't being used by some tech bro to pump the
       | valuation of a company designed to replace me.
        
         | galoisscobi wrote:
         | Here you go: https://platform.openai.com/docs/plugins/bot
        
           | 23B1 wrote:
           | OpenAI isn't the only player in this field my friend!
        
       | samsquire wrote:
       | Do we need to spell out why something is interesting or useful?
       | Show don't tell?
       | 
       | Or are we all looking for an aesthetic that we love and want to
       | see more of but we know it when we see it?
       | 
       | I've been journalling about computers since 2013. I am looking
       | for something higher and beautiful.
        
         | rpastuszak wrote:
         | I think either works and I read with different purposes I mind.
         | 
         | Get your work out there and see.
        
       | thumbuddy wrote:
       | Au contraire. Publish nothing, delete the key results, and put
       | intentional bugs in every home project. Otherwise you will be
       | stolen from, or exploited. Sit back and wait and watch the rare
       | few people approach your ideas. Reach out to them with interest
       | and make best friends for life.
       | 
       | I know the op isn't about this but love putting nuggets like this
       | out there
        
         | barrysteve wrote:
         | Publishing and building reputation with a robber baron is not
         | worthless...
         | 
         | (unless it's Musk :p)
        
         | BSEdlMMldESB wrote:
         | comes down to what your goal really is.
         | 
         | you are either being sarcastic, or just super cynical.
         | 
         | in any case, I don't have enough fucks to give out for fame, my
         | intention is different from the person who wrote the article
         | who clearly enjoys the attention; to each our own
         | 
         | nonetheless, the signal is clear (and I agree with it) the
         | author of something is usually the worst judge of which of
         | their work is 'best', and ultimately, the "best hits" will not
         | be their own choice but the choice of them inspired by the
         | authored piece.
         | 
         | --
         | 
         | closer to the middle: do be wary of publishing too much, as if
         | there weren't already a deluge of content
        
       | heikkilevanto wrote:
       | Some 25 years ago I got my own domain, and put up my first
       | personal web page. It said something like "My web site is not
       | even under construction yet. I put a page up when I have
       | something to tell the world, not before!" - That text is still up
       | there, basically unchanged. There are other things on that web
       | server, but they are password protected and for my personal use
       | only.
       | 
       | As you can see, I disagree with the idea of publishing
       | "everything" and hoping that some of it might go viral or get a
       | lot of likes.
        
       | RetroTechie wrote:
       | Do AI's absorbing your 'wisdom' count as views? :-)
       | 
       | I like my published stuff / comments etc getting attention. But
       | only as a sign of people internalizing it, learning, enjoying,
       | reflecting on their views & so on. Transferring knowledge,
       | exchanging ideas, sharing projects, help fix problems others are
       | having, that kind of thing.
       | 
       | Like on HN: if there's a story with maaany comments, I don't
       | usually bother aside from reading. For a story no-one cares
       | about, same thing. In between, if what I'd like to add is already
       | mentioned, not much point in elaborating. But if not: sure, add
       | your opinion or datapoints.
       | 
       | Same with science papers (I don't write those): if your paper
       | advances the state of the art, then publish! If it might, or adds
       | datapoints to hotly debated subject, yes plz. But if it's just
       | 101st attempt that's been chewed on by everyone and their dog &
       | few if any peers will ever read your paper, why bother? (and why
       | bother with such research - find more interesting subject). More
       | crap out there just makes the interesting stuff harder to find.
       | 
       | Btw: doesn't mean you can't re-visit a subject that's last been
       | done long ago, or by few others, and where tools / environment /
       | knowledge has changed since then.
       | 
       | Or if you publish some project which has been done by many, but
       | yours is more up-to-date or better _documented_ than existing
       | ones, sure add value to what 's out there.
        
       | anon7331 wrote:
       | Why publish at all? Who cares if something blows up and goes
       | viral? Why should I spend any time publishing anything?
       | 
       | Personally, I'd rather spend time doing something that enriches
       | my life and/or the lives of people I care about.
        
         | LightBug1 wrote:
         | I agree with this ... unless publishing enriches your life
         | and/or the lives of people you care about.
        
         | kqr wrote:
         | Great question!
         | 
         | For me a large part of publishing is getting to hear the
         | thoughts of the clever people in my readership.
         | 
         | If I'm obviously wrong, anyone can point that out to me, but if
         | I'm only subtly wrong, it takes popularity to have the right
         | person read the article and correct me.
        
         | codazoda wrote:
         | For me, the most rewarding part is to help people. I love
         | getting a random email saying "thanks" for a few sentences I
         | jotted down that saved someone else time or money or made their
         | life better somehow.
         | 
         | My most valuable example actually came from a tiny web app I
         | created. I got a email telling me that someone had lost 212 lbs
         | and my app was part of their success. I was sure the number was
         | a typo so I responded and confirmed. When I reached out 6 years
         | later they said:
         | 
         | "I weigh 163.8 this morning down from a high of 387. It has
         | changed my life and the weight has stayed off (but I'm never
         | off the program)."
         | 
         | I think your words, no matter how simple, would be powerful to
         | others.
        
           | fsociety wrote:
           | Often we are so focused on scale and quantitative data we
           | forget to value impact like this. Sounds amazing!
        
           | 0x6461188A wrote:
           | What was the tiny web app?
        
         | OfSanguineFire wrote:
         | In a world where so much is done online, one's reputation and
         | job opportunities, too, might depend on what you can show for
         | yourself online. No matter what business you are in, building
         | an online presence is highly recommended. Creating content that
         | goes viral can draw clients, get you a better offer from your
         | current employer's competitor, or reveal other income streams
         | that might allow you to leave a current job that you hate.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-08-12 23:02 UTC)