[HN Gopher] On the (nearly lethal) comforts of a luxury cruise (...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       On the (nearly lethal) comforts of a luxury cruise (1996) [pdf]
        
       Author : bookofjoe
       Score  : 59 points
       Date   : 2023-08-02 16:18 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (harpers.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (harpers.org)
        
       | alwa wrote:
       | See also Lauren Oyler's (May 2023) "I Really Didn't Want To Go,"
       | also published in Harpers [0], which in part refracts this
       | classic essay (and its author) through the lens of a generation's
       | remove; also Patricia Lockwood's (July 2023) reflections on all
       | of the above in the LRB [1].
       | 
       | [0] https://harpers.org/archive/2023/05/goop-cruise-gwyneth-
       | palt...
       | 
       | [1] https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v45/n14/patricia-
       | lockwood/wh...
        
       | eastbayjake wrote:
       | Fun Fact: it's been alleged by contemporaries like Jonathan
       | Franzen that DFW fabricated many of these stories, there's a
       | reason they were not published as nonfiction in a magazine with a
       | rigorous fact-check process like the _New Yorker_. (Which is not
       | to say DFW 's "nonfiction" writing is not entertaining or
       | illuminating - it is!)
       | 
       | https://www.theawl.com/2011/10/a-supposedly-true-thing-jonat...
        
         | gizajob wrote:
         | Yeah but part of the exercise is sending a fiction writer off
         | to write non-fiction. Of course it gets fantastical, that's the
         | point!
        
         | lisper wrote:
         | As someone who has taken a lot of cruises I can tell you from
         | firsthand experience that many of his descriptions are
         | factually inaccurate. But I think that is missing the point.
         | What is really going on here, I think, is DFW struggling with
         | his clinical depression, from which a cruise offered no respite
         | despite the fact that it's one of those things in life that is
         | supposed to Make Everything Better. Viewed in that light, it's
         | quite a poignant glimpse into the tortured psyche of a
         | brilliant mind.
         | 
         | Just don't take it as anything remotely like an objective
         | review.
        
           | nocoiner wrote:
           | That's interesting. I've only been on one or two cruises, but
           | my recollection of the article is that it all seemed
           | directionally accurate, or at least plausible.
           | 
           | It sounds like you certainly know better that I would,
           | though, so I'm just curious - what are some examples of the
           | inaccuracies?
           | 
           | I do not mean to be confrontational in the slightest, so I
           | hope my question isn't coming off that way.
        
             | lisper wrote:
             | Well, let's start with the title. It is simply not true
             | that anything on a cruise ship is "nearly lethal". Cruise
             | ships are ridiculously safe environments compared to the
             | rest of the world. Just about the only place you're going
             | to be safer is on an airplane. Even your own home is almost
             | certainly more dangerous than a modern cruise ship.
             | 
             | The other thing that really struck me was his
             | characterization of the cruise environment as "an enormous
             | primordial stew of death and decay." It isn't, at least not
             | any more than anyplace else on the planet. Sure, boats
             | rust, but so what? This is just another example of the
             | continual struggle of life against the Second Law. This
             | entire planet is "an enormous primordial stew of death and
             | decay." It is, of course, also an enormous nursery of life
             | emerging from that death and decay. That's just the Way It
             | Is. Cruse ships are just part of the human phenotype, no
             | different from any other artifact. Nothing lasts forever.
             | Getting maudlin about it is a choice.
             | 
             | Some other random examples: he renames the ship from Zenith
             | to Nadir as a dark joke, but then he keeps referring to her
             | that way. The micromanagement he describes on page 37
             | doesn't happen, except insofar as the staff will try to be
             | helpful in allowing you to make the most of your limited
             | time.
             | 
             | Reading back over it I guess the problem is not so much
             | blatant factual inaccuracies as it is continually and
             | unrelentingly putting the worst possible spin on every
             | detail of what is actually a very enjoyable experience --
             | if you allow it to be, which he emphatically did not. The
             | most charitable interpretation I can come up with is that
             | this was the clinical depression talking.
        
               | bob1029 wrote:
               | > The most charitable interpretation I can come up with
               | is that this was the clinical depression talking.
               | 
               | I think cruises are kind of shitty. Is it possible that
               | one could dislike the experience without suffering from
               | something in DSM?
               | 
               | To me they're the crowning jewel of shameless
               | consumerism. It's like getting one of those 14-in-1 tools
               | from the dollar store. Sure, you got everything in one
               | pocket but they're all pretty crappy versions of the
               | original.
               | 
               | I get the travel angle, but airplanes are a hell of a lot
               | faster. I've never found myself reading sky mall thinking
               | I'd prefer to be roaming through an actual mall.
        
               | gizajob wrote:
               | or a writer really just goofing around in the same way
               | as, say, Seinfeld.
        
               | lisper wrote:
               | I didn't like Seinfeld either. There are enough people
               | behaving like assholes in the real world. I don't need
               | more of that in my evening entertainment.
        
               | gizajob wrote:
               | Or George Carlin. Or Bill Hicks. Or a bunch of other
               | people you don't like but that many enjoy regardless.
        
               | lisper wrote:
               | The problem with Seinfeld is that they deliberately set
               | out to make a show with unsympathetic characters whose
               | central personality trait is that they care about no one
               | but themselves. Basically, they're sociopaths. Carlin can
               | be abrasive, but I don't think he's a sociopath.
        
           | gymbeaux wrote:
           | The story is an excellent metaphor for how people like him
           | (dare I say "us") look at life. We overthink and we are
           | uncomfortable at the thought of being "pampered" as though we
           | are superior to the person pampering us. Logical or not,
           | that's how I feel about it. Perhaps it's because we are aware
           | of the lousiness of a job such as "porter" whereas the
           | average person is oblivious, disinterested, apathetic or
           | whatever else.
        
             | lisper wrote:
             | In his famous "This is Water" essay DFW exhibits enormous
             | empathy for others, but I find that empathy MIA here. Yes,
             | there is a little bit of effort to describe the duffel bag
             | story from the porter's point of view, but that's not
             | really the overarching point, which is that Cruising Is
             | Horrible because Life Is Horrible and there is No Way Out
             | and there is no escape from the pit of existential despair.
             | 
             | If instead he'd written a piece about how the staff on
             | cruise ships work ridiculously hard for very low pay to
             | give the guests a respite from their own shitty lives
             | because the crew live even shittier lives than the guests,
             | that would have been a much better piece. But that's not
             | the piece he chose to write here. Alas.
        
               | gizajob wrote:
               | But why should he write something to suit your moral
               | demands? The piece is clearly and obviously designed to
               | entertain, and is written by a character called DFW who
               | is as much of an invention as everything described. I
               | feel you're missing the depth and the angle - it's not
               | meant to be purely descriptive, it's artistic
               | entertainment.
        
               | lisper wrote:
               | Yeah, I get that. But as a fan of cruising it feels like
               | a cheap shot at an activity I enjoy and the people who
               | work their butts off to make it possible. DFW seems
               | completely oblivious to the fact that the people behind
               | the scenes of his dystopian fantasy (to say nothing of
               | people like me who buy their product) are actual human
               | beings with hopes and dreams and feelings. You can spin
               | this as "suiting my moral demands" but I think that my
               | entertainment should come at their expense.
        
               | gizajob wrote:
               | Don't read it then...
               | 
               | Also, if you're a fan of cruising, why do you continue to
               | do it knowing the completely compromised position of
               | those below decks who are being cruelly taken advantage
               | of and underpaid to deliver you your cruise? It seems
               | like you're pinning your own issues with yourself and the
               | activity onto DFW while continuing to enjoy it
        
               | lisper wrote:
               | Because the people below decks are still taking those
               | jobs voluntarily, and so as bad as their situation is in
               | those jobs, I figure they must still be worse off without
               | them.
               | 
               | I also try to avoid cruise lines that really abuse their
               | workers.
        
           | jacquesm wrote:
           | I think the last thing you want to do with clinically
           | depressed people is to put them within a continuously
           | available means of easy suicide while at the same time
           | exposing them to some pretty rude examples of exploitation
           | and near indentured servitude.
           | 
           | Cruise ships are enough to make mentally healthy people
           | depressed.
        
             | ChuckMcM wrote:
             | I don't think people appreciate this enough.
        
           | asdfman123 wrote:
           | I think it's a big mistake for young people (like my former
           | self) to take deeply unhappy 20th century authors like DFW,
           | Bukowski, Hunter S. Thompson too much to heart.
           | 
           | Yes, they did have important things to say, and yes, it
           | wasn't their fault that they were so unhappy, but you should
           | never try to be like them.
        
             | adzm wrote:
             | We were just trying to find the American dream
        
               | asdfman123 wrote:
               | It seems like they were too focused on rejecting
               | everything that was already there, though. (FAL reference
               | duly noted.)
        
           | TheRealDunkirk wrote:
           | Oblig: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbwlC2B-BIg
        
         | jrm4 wrote:
         | It's _really_ hard for me to see this as anything more than,
         | Oh, Franzen 's a hater.
         | 
         | Come to think of it, I've never read anything _about_ DFW that
         | comes remotely close to what he did on the page? Like it seems
         | like every writer who has more than a few paragraphs on DFW is
         | someone _obviously_ inferior?
         | 
         | Relatedly, a wild thing, Chuck Palahniuk has written _very
         | little_ about him, but this included the fact that HE AND DFW
         | SHARE A BIRTHDAY.
         | 
         | That kinda blew my mind.
        
           | giraffe_lady wrote:
           | Franzen wasn't the first and hasn't been the most consistent
           | among those raising this concern. DT Max, who was Wallace's
           | friend, and not even a rival-friend like Franzen, has said he
           | thinks the chess encounter from this story is fabricated.
           | 
           | It's also been very convincingly established that the
           | "companion" of the state fair essay didn't exist or wasn't
           | there, which fundamentally changes the piece in a very
           | serious way. His relationship to the publication in the
           | famous "consider the lobster" essay was also not at all what
           | he claimed within the essay.
           | 
           | He was a great writer in many ways and these don't change
           | that or reflect on his skill. I think his even publishing as
           | "nonfiction" was more a characteristic of the literary-
           | journalistic culture of his time, rather than an informed
           | choice on his behalf. Tall tales and partially fictionalized
           | accounts of real events are themselves a deep American
           | literary tradition and there's no shame in that heritage.
           | 
           | But it's well established now that he wasn't the most
           | strictly scrupulous writer or person in general. He stalked
           | and harassed Mary Karr for years, and he has absolutely been
           | caught in small lies in his published works. Whether you
           | still trust him on the big stuff is up to you I guess,
           | doesn't speak to his literary legacy much either way imo.
        
           | jancsika wrote:
           | > Like it seems like every writer who has more than a few
           | paragraphs on DFW is someone _obviously_ inferior?
           | 
           | That seems like a crank opinion, at least wrt Franzen's
           | writing and your italics around the word "obviously."
        
             | jrm4 wrote:
             | I mean, it's definitely my opinion, that's why I did the
             | "it seems." To me it does feel obvious, but I do wonder if
             | others agree?
             | 
             | I mean, I've read Infinite Jest (I did mostly skip the
             | footnotes) but I can't get through more than a few pages of
             | every Franzen novel I've tried. Could just be me.
        
           | huthuthike wrote:
           | Franzen was one of DFW's closest friends.
        
             | jrm4 wrote:
             | Sure, but if you know writers, this in no way excludes the
             | possibility I mentioned :)
        
       | ChrisArchitect wrote:
       | Aside: nice to know Harpers has secured that paywalled
       | 'subscriber only' pdf content there...heh
        
       | simulo wrote:
       | I'm fascinated by the very mid-90s graphic design and typography.
        
       | mahathu wrote:
       | I don't know how it came about, but this was one of the first
       | audiobooks I used to listen to as a child, when my family had a
       | subscription that included 2 free audiobooks every week/month or
       | whatever. It left quite an impression on me and turned me into a
       | life long DFW fan, another favourite of mine is "Good Old Neon":
       | https://sdavidmiller.com/octo/files/no_google2/GoodOldNeon.p...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-08-02 23:01 UTC)