[HN Gopher] Pressure-driven distillation for fast and selective ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Pressure-driven distillation for fast and selective water
       purification
        
       Author : wglb
       Score  : 40 points
       Date   : 2023-07-29 14:41 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (techxplore.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (techxplore.com)
        
       | credit_guy wrote:
       | Unfortunately, at least in the US, desalination cost is dominated
       | by the high cost of capital, not by the cost of the energy.
       | 
       | For example, the largest desal plant in the US is the Carlsbad
       | plant in California [1]. For our purposes, it's a very nice
       | plant, because the numbers are very round: it cost $1 BN to
       | build. It has an output of 190k cubic meters per day, or 5.7
       | million m3 per month. The plant was funded with bonds. Let's say
       | you want to build it today. A private person has access to 30y
       | mortgage rates of about 7.7%. But this being a large corporation,
       | and using municipal bonds that are tax exempt, let's say you can
       | borrow at 5.5%. If you plug in a mortgage calculator, that comes
       | to $5.7 MM per month, which is very fortunate, or a very round
       | $1.00 per m3.
       | 
       | The energy use of desalination is in the range of 2.5 to 4.0 kWh
       | per m3 ([2], page 91). Let's say it is 4.0 for the Carlsbad plant
       | (to be conservative; most likely it is lower). The average cost
       | of electricity for US industrial users is $0.0775 [4], so that's
       | about 19 cents per m3.
       | 
       | Recap: $1.00 capex cost per m3, $0.19 electricity cost per m3.
       | Increasing the efficiency of desalination by a factor of 2 would
       | not make desalinated water twice as cheap, but only about 10%
       | cheaper.
       | 
       | There is an asterisk here though: I don't know why, but the cost
       | of electricity in California is much higher than the average cost
       | in the US. It costs 18 cents vs 7.75 cents. So, for the
       | particular case of California, the capex cost still dominates,
       | but not by a factor of 5, only by a factor of 2.
       | 
       | [1]
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_%22Bud%22_Lewis_Carlsba...
       | 
       | [2]
       | https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2019/09/f66/73355...
       | 
       | [3] https://www.amtaorg.com/wp-
       | content/uploads/07_Membrane_Desal...
       | 
       | [4]
       | https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.ph...
        
       | nine_k wrote:
       | The cool trick is to use a nano-porous hydrophobic material with
       | some air trapped in the pores. Water evaporates into the air,
       | then re-condenses on the other side, while salt can't pass. The
       | water does not stick inside, because the material (based on
       | silane) is hydrophobic.
       | 
       | The practically important part is that the membrane does not
       | degrade from the chlorine and ozone, the typical water
       | disinfectants.
        
         | mdp2021 wrote:
         | > _while salt can 't pass_
         | 
         | But will not the separated salt clog the membrane? Separated
         | salt is an issue, e.g. in distillation - you have to remove it
         | to remain decently efficient.
         | 
         | And speaking of efficiency: do energy costs make mass
         | desalinization with this technology feasible?
        
           | freshpots wrote:
           | Salt doesn't pass through RO membranes and these appear to
           | have the same pore size. However, they all foul and you
           | perform maintenance like backwashing and chemical cleaning as
           | the flow rate goes down.
           | 
           | Here is an overview: https://www.suezwaterhandbook.com/water-
           | and-generalities/fun...
           | 
           | In terms of efficiency, it is cost dependent. Making drinking
           | water is not cost prohibitive at this time but for large
           | scale agriculture it would typically be considered too
           | expensive to irrigate with RO desalinated water. This
           | technology appears to lower the energy requirements but more
           | research and scaling it up is needed.
        
             | Gibbon1 wrote:
             | When I've looked into RO for irrigation it seems that cost
             | is a problem but it's tantalizingly close to economic. I
             | think you need to get the cost down by 2/3rds.
             | 
             | However boron is a problem, most RO water has more boron
             | than is healthy for plants. Though I saw one press release
             | talking about a membrane that unexpectedly produces water
             | with low levels of boron.
        
               | freshpots wrote:
               | Interesting, TIL. I wasn't aware of boron issues with RO.
               | Is this for seawater RO to irrigation water?
               | 
               | This link is interesting:
               | https://www.globalwaterintel.com/sponsored-content/boron-
               | a-k...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-07-30 23:01 UTC)