[HN Gopher] You can deactivate anyone's WhatsApp account by simp...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       You can deactivate anyone's WhatsApp account by simply sending an
       email
        
       Author : KomoD
       Score  : 232 points
       Date   : 2023-07-17 19:33 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (twitter.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (twitter.com)
        
       | cuteboy19 wrote:
       | But you can reactivate instantly and it doesn't cause data loss
       | if you don't try anything funny during deactivation
        
         | DennisP wrote:
         | What would constitute "trying something funny?"
        
           | chefandy wrote:
           | Using your account for anything more humorous than amateur
           | improv comedy, I imagine. Considering how many downvotes most
           | jokes seem to get on HN, I can't imagine that'd be a problem
           | with this crowd.
        
             | [deleted]
        
           | stuckkeys wrote:
           | You forgot to include "you know, for science" part.
        
         | breakingcups wrote:
         | Then I wonder, what's the point?
        
           | countvonbalzac wrote:
           | If someone doesn't control your phone number they can't
           | reactivate.
        
         | jedberg wrote:
         | Assuming you notice it was deactivated within the short time
         | span they give you. If you're a casual user it could get really
         | annoying to show up and be deactivated, most likely when you
         | have a fairly urgent need.
        
           | veave wrote:
           | short time span == 30 days???
        
             | urbandw311er wrote:
             | I've been on holidays longer than that
        
               | dangus wrote:
               | Must be nice
        
             | jedberg wrote:
             | I live in America so I really only need to use WhatsApp
             | when I travel to foreign places so I can contact vendors.
             | That happens maybe once every other year. I'd be pretty
             | upset if I fired up WhatsApp and it didn't work when I
             | really needed to call a vendor.
        
       | lxe wrote:
       | This is perfect for getting rid of scammers.
        
         | teddyh wrote:
         | "Oh? And, when the last law was down, and the Devil turned
         | round on you - where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being
         | flat?"
         | 
         | -- _A Man for All Seasons_ , Robert Bolt, 1960
        
       | exabrial wrote:
       | Reminds me of government systems where you can lock a specific
       | user out by typing in bad passwords multiple times.
        
         | johnisgood wrote:
         | This happens on way too many sites.
        
           | delphi4711 wrote:
           | Apple e.g. Even when 2fa is activated, and no successful
           | login happened, they will deactivate my account and force me
           | to change my password :/. I had to change my email that I use
           | to login to Apple.
        
         | kiwijamo wrote:
         | This happens on non-government systems too. The only system
         | I've experienced this has been a financial institution's
         | system. Frustrating as it meant I had to make the trip into one
         | of their branches to get it reset.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | KomoD wrote:
         | Another very annoying one is when doing forgot password changes
         | the password and emails you a copy, so some funny guy can just
         | go and keep doing forgot password and it force changes your
         | password.
        
           | igitur wrote:
           | I know a site that does this, except they run their own SMTP
           | server that sometimes blocks up, so the emails never arrive.
        
             | gmargari wrote:
             | This was not meant to be used that way:
             | https://www.troyhunt.com/building-password-purgatory-with-
             | cl...
        
             | smrtinsert wrote:
             | w
        
       | JimtheCoder wrote:
       | So, we all want to make it easier to cancel things.
       | 
       | But not too easy...
        
         | pmx wrote:
         | I want it to be easy to cancel my own stuff, not easy for
         | someone else to do it for me.
        
       | robertlagrant wrote:
       | Clearly Leetcode questions don't cover avoiding the world's
       | dumbest recovery processes.
        
         | nine_zeros wrote:
         | Hey, at least someone got a promo for "impact" in building a
         | low maintenance service with 0% outage history.
        
         | sakopov wrote:
         | It might be dumb, but it locks you out in O(1).
        
       | go_prodev wrote:
       | Years ago I bought my dad an Audible subscription, but because it
       | was a gift I signed up with my email address and then changed it
       | to my dad's address on his birthday. Somehow I ended up inside
       | his Amazon account because I used his email address. I guess some
       | of the backend logic is hard to get right the first time.
       | 
       | Another time I was talking to a credit union CTO who was dealing
       | with someone blocking other people's account access by picking a
       | random account number and making 3 bogus guesses to lock them
       | out. At the time the credit union had a policy that required
       | calling them to unblock... which was a PITA on weekends when
       | people need money.
        
         | mey wrote:
         | Instacart has some sort of similar issue, signed up under my
         | email, changed the email address to my wife, support requests
         | get sent to both of our addresses.
        
         | TheJoeMan wrote:
         | Hey just fyi: they're not doing it for the purpose of locking
         | people out. They're doing a distributed account breakin.
         | Doesn't matter to the thief who's money they steal, so just try
         | "password" on everyone's account until you get in.
        
           | gabeio wrote:
           | Yet another amazing reason to use hide my email features,
           | less-guessable user emails as well as unique emails per
           | service.
        
         | jen729w wrote:
         | Someone with my name bought a new iPhone in Bismarck, ND last
         | week. They gave AT&T my iCloud email address which is
         | firstname.lastname. An honest mistake, I guess.
         | 
         | AT&T dutifully asked 'me' to confirm my email address. I did
         | not.
         | 
         | Aaaand... now I still get all of his account email. So what's
         | the point.
        
           | soneil wrote:
           | I've been struggling with this for years - but with a fun
           | twist. My gmail address is first.last, and someone in the UK
           | keeps using it - but they do not have remotely the same first
           | name, and they don't spell their last name the same as I do
           | (the single-L in my username here is a less common deviation,
           | their surname is the more common variant).
           | 
           | Years. I've closed netflix accounts, I've sent them sms from
           | their telco's webtext portal asking them to stop, and still
           | there's a koneill out there who is very, very confused about
           | why his email doesn't work. I know where he lives, I know
           | what pizza he ordered, I know his name, his phone number, I
           | just don't know his email address. And apparently, neither
           | does he.
           | 
           | The number of services that fail at email validation (or keep
           | sending you reminders, forever, that you haven't validated),
           | blows my mind. For such a simple process, that seems to exist
           | on every single service I (and koneill) sign up for, it has a
           | surprisingly low rate of successful implementations.
        
             | rootusrootus wrote:
             | I have a similar problem. I have a half dozen different
             | people sending their emails to my gmail account. One of
             | them is a woman who signed up my address for her health
             | care provider, and they're quite liberal with what kind of
             | detail they're willing to put in an email. I tracked her
             | down on Facebook and mentioned it to her, and she seemed to
             | get that it was a problem she might want to solve, but to
             | this day I still get all those emails.
             | 
             | In retrospect I should have chosen g6adfs789zg2@gmail.com
             | or something.
        
             | irrational wrote:
             | There is a woman in another state that must have a gmail
             | address very close to my wife's. We know when this woman
             | gets Botox, how much she pays for her kids dance lessons (a
             | lot!), and so much more. You would think she would realize
             | at some point, but it has been years and my wife still gets
             | so much of her mail.
             | 
             | I used to get email for a guy in California when he would
             | buy something from Harbor Freight, rent a movie from
             | Redbox, or order a pizza. Those started tapering off about
             | a year ago, so he must have figured it out.
             | 
             | The strangest one was I was receiving email for a colonel
             | in the US Army! For a few years I kept getting these group
             | emails to all these army officers about upcoming training
             | exercises. I thought about replying to let them know they
             | shouldn't be sending them to me, but was worried about
             | getting in trouble, so never did. They continued for years,
             | but finally stopped. I always wondered if the guy had a
             | .mil address and accidentally used gmail.com.
        
           | makr17 wrote:
           | My gmail address is lastname@gmail.com. Not a particularly
           | common last name, and I thought it lucky when I got that
           | address early on. I've since come to view it as mostly a
           | curse.
           | 
           | I get email invoice every time Orkin goes out to spray a
           | house in North Carolina. No option to say "this isn't me",
           | and I've given up calling to tell them after multiple cycles.
           | 
           | The elderly German couple that would email their train
           | itinerary so that their cousin could pick them up at the
           | station. I would politely reply that I am not their cousin,
           | and consequently their cousin would not be at the station.
           | And six months later we start again.
           | 
           | Someone in Canada with first initial + last name that results
           | in my last name kept getting wired money, and I would get in
           | email with instructions. Of course no "not me" option. I
           | haven't seen one of those in a while, hopefully he figured it
           | out.
           | 
           | And so many more stories of people with my last name or close
           | to it happily sending me their email... But I've had the
           | address for practically forever, and really don't want to let
           | it go.
        
             | EvanAnderson wrote:
             | I love these stories.
             | 
             | I got service emails for the same year, model, and color
             | Honda Civic that I own from a dealer in the UK. I am in the
             | US. That alone was spooky.
             | 
             | The car was owned by somebody who matched my first initial,
             | last name email address.
             | 
             | I tried to unsubscribe. I tried to contact customer
             | service. Nothing worked.
             | 
             | Each email would come with a little video walk around of
             | the car. Eventually I started responding saying that their
             | paint looked better than my car, etc.
             | 
             | I don't get them anymore. I presume the owner sold the car.
        
         | username135 wrote:
         | This happens with my Gmail account.
         | 
         | I know periods don't count, supposedly, but I still get emails
         | for someone with the same name as mine. My email is first.last,
         | theirs is firstlast. I wonder how much of my stuff they get
         | erroneously?
        
           | __ryan__ wrote:
           | You are correct that the period doesn't count. Both email
           | addresses belong to the same account. A possible explanation
           | is that they have entered your email as a mistake.
        
       | barbazoo wrote:
       | I can view tweets again without being logged in ?!?
        
         | shmde wrote:
         | Yes. But you cannot see replies and authors page. Use
         | https://nitter.net/ for that.
        
       | bastard_op wrote:
       | Sounds like there should be a mass service to close everyone's
       | accounts in their name then. You know, doing them a favor and
       | such.
        
       | swader999 wrote:
       | Too bad it didn't work for the entire meta user base. We could
       | free the world. It would be like independence day when they
       | uploaded the virus to kill the mothership.
        
         | SilasX wrote:
         | Haha I'd think a better comparison would be (an explosion-free)
         | Fight Club.
        
           | maerF0x0 wrote:
           | Or Mr. Robot attacking E corp.
        
         | maskedinvader wrote:
         | I get why one would feel this way if this was one of Meta's
         | social media apps, but WhatsApp is one of the biggest messaging
         | apps used in so many countries and perhaps also helped kill the
         | telecoms companies paid sms plans to force cheaper sms msging
         | rates, if anything WhatsApp is perhaps the best value Meta has
         | provided to the world, bringing the world closer.
        
           | username135 wrote:
           | It still boggles my mind that they paid SO much for it
        
             | Barrin92 wrote:
             | well it is by far the most used messenger app in the world
             | with 2+ billion users so in that sense it seems prescient
             | but i'd agree it's still questionable how they'll monetize
             | it.
        
           | annadane wrote:
           | Yes but the _original founders_ did that. Zuckerberg took it
           | from them and immediately lied about data sharing, there 's a
           | reason why the founders left in disgust
        
             | avalys wrote:
             | Correction: The founders _sold it to Zuckerberg for
             | billions of dollars_.
             | 
             | Saying he "took it from them" is outright dishonest.
        
               | annadane wrote:
               | They sold it under the condition he wouldn't lie, it was
               | a condition for him to have it, and he lied
        
               | avalys wrote:
               | So why didn't they take the billions of dollars he paid
               | them and sue to have this "condition" upheld?
        
               | lost_tourist wrote:
               | I'll never understand why people don't place value on
               | integrity. I mean day to day people and not stockholders.
               | Zuck controls what happens at Meta, it's not a board
               | decision on stuff like this unless Zuck tells them to do
               | it.
        
               | [deleted]
        
               | er4hn wrote:
               | One of the co-founders, Brian Acton, has funded most of
               | Signal (~100M USD) in his post WhapsApp life. It is a
               | very hacker mindset solution. Instead of turning to the
               | law to enforce nebulous claims against a megacorp, make a
               | better product with the money you got from said megacorp.
        
               | bboygravity wrote:
               | Plot twist: Signal turns out to be a CIA honey-pot.
        
               | brewdad wrote:
               | I know "nothing to hide" is never a strong argument but
               | even if Signal is a CIA honeypot, if it keeps my personal
               | conversations from becoming marketing fodder, sign me up!
        
               | pessimizer wrote:
               | I'm definitely not a "nothing to hide" guy, but if the
               | CIA wants something on me they're going to find it in 5
               | minutes. They would only be using a backdoored Signal to
               | get the smart guys; so I guess I have to thank the smart
               | guys for the CIA giving us Signal...
        
               | GGO wrote:
               | well he took money under the promise and when FB broke
               | the promise, he walked away and left $850M on the table.
               | https://finance.yahoo.com/news/whatsapp-co-founder-
               | walked-aw...
        
               | nilsbunger wrote:
               | To punish Facebook for breaking their promise, he ...
               | gave Facebook $850M (by not vesting all his equity) ?
        
               | mcpackieh wrote:
               | Angry people can be irrational. That's my read.
        
               | thakoppno wrote:
               | > I'm taking some time off to do things outside of
               | technology, such as collecting rare air-cooled Porsches.
        
               | DropInIn wrote:
               | It's not a condition if it's not in the contract or if it
               | is and is not acted upon.
               | 
               | In either of those cases it's just lip service.
        
           | frizlab wrote:
           | WhatsApp is a company Meta bought, not brought to the world
           | AFAIK.
        
           | midasuni wrote:
           | Except that was all done before meta bought it.
           | 
           | https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travel-
           | technology/952359-tho...
        
             | lmm wrote:
             | But getting bought by facebook was the only business plan
             | they ever had, so it was facebook that made all that
             | possible.
        
               | eps wrote:
               | Not true. They were doing perfectly fine charging a fair
               | fraction of their 100 mil userbase $1 a month. They sold
               | because founders wanted an _exit_.
        
           | Angostura wrote:
           | It also demands full access to the totality of your contacts
           | to work properly.
           | 
           | An appalling requirement
        
             | NikolaNovak wrote:
             | I always feel I'm in a twilight zone with whatsapp. Am I
             | the only person who doesn't want or need to give the app
             | all of my contacts, or even register with just phone
             | number? Phone number is such an intensely and irrevocably
             | identifiable token and so hard to change, that using it for
             | pervasive messaging seems insane to me :-/
        
               | jsnell wrote:
               | I'm sure you're not the only one, but in a tiny, tiny
               | minority. Using the phone number as the identifier was
               | pretty much the main selling point of Whats App.
        
               | qingcharles wrote:
               | I hate these apps that absolutely need a phone number. I
               | couldn't pay my bill on my cellphone one month, lost the
               | number and now I can't access either my WhatsApp or
               | Telegram accounts.
        
               | romwell wrote:
               | I've had my phone stolen while traveling, and I can't say
               | how much I despise _any_ system that uses a phone number
               | for authentication.
               | 
               | Go figure, you can't get a SIM card sent to you from the
               | US to Europe, meaning that you potentially lose:
               | 
               | * Access to messenger apps and chat history
               | 
               | * Access to your bank account (with a special nod to
               | Citi)
               | 
               | * Access to your email account if it uses "2FA" with a
               | phone (looking at you, Google)
               | 
               | * etc
               | 
               | Given that my bank cards and laptop were stolen along
               | with the phone, I've had a Very Fun Time(tm) dealing with
               | all these systems.
        
               | smallerfish wrote:
               | You can port your phone number to a voip provider if you
               | will be out of the country for a while. Use a sip phone
               | app, and the "transport layer" sim that you happen to use
               | will have nothing to do with the phone number that is
               | intermingled with your identity.
        
             | tiltowait wrote:
             | Maybe it would break a lot of things, but my gut instinct
             | is I wish it were illegal for an app to slurp up, even with
             | the user's consent, all of the user's contacts. Any such
             | entries should be manual.
             | 
             | I don't use $SERVICE. I never want to use $SERVICE. I
             | certainly don't consent to $SERVICE having my contact info
             | because some acquaintance/friend/family member who doesn't
             | know any better tapped "allow" on a button. But because
             | it's allowed, any number of immoral companies like Facebook
             | have my info, even though I've made a conscious decision
             | never to use them due to their privacy violations.
        
         | moffkalast wrote:
         | In an ideal world. In reality it would be a short outage,
         | they'd roll back the DB and patch the exploit in like 10 hours
         | total.
        
       | thund wrote:
       | Imagine a world (populated by a human species) where this would
       | be the norm...
        
       | TheCaptain4815 wrote:
       | Anyone know Zuckerburgs WhatsApp account?
        
       | cwkoss wrote:
       | Is anyone working on a script to enumerate all phone numbers and
       | deactivate every whatsapp account yet?
        
         | cwkoss wrote:
         | I wonder if it would be possible for someone who is really good
         | at getting media stories placed - buy a bunch of put options
         | and sell just after the story breaks - could this be a
         | profitable tradable event?
         | 
         | Meta is such a big company I'd be surprised if the cost of the
         | options premiums were less than the value that could be
         | harvested... but maybe..?
        
           | loeg wrote:
           | CFAA.
        
       | dogtorwoof wrote:
       | Several friends of mine had their WhatsApp completely hacked.
       | Basically, hacker would spam recovery, which results in a phone
       | call to the victim. If the victim doesn't pick up the phone, the
       | recovery code goes to voicemail. Hacker accesses voice mail
       | (password protected yes, but for lots of people it's a birth
       | year, 1234, 0000, or last 4 digits of their phone), and voila
       | they have access to your WhatsApp. They can't see your messages
       | but can see all the groups you're in and message those.
       | 
       | Completely preventable by having WhatsApp 2FA enabled.
        
         | Andrex wrote:
         | Another unintentional benefit to clinging to Google Voice for
         | dear life... Though I don't use WhatsApp.
        
         | fortran77 wrote:
         | And some systems still don't ask for pin if you are calling
         | from your phone. So if you spoof their CID (very easy to do)
         | you get in with no password
        
           | flangola7 wrote:
           | Wow that is terrible. Wouldn't that violate multiple data
           | protection laws?
        
         | cryptoegorophy wrote:
         | Had this done to me BUT luckily WhatsApp has a "pin" feature,
         | which prevented hackers getting any further. Not as secure
         | maybe as a 2factor but saved my day. Highly recommend.
        
       | djbusby wrote:
       | Chase bank has a similar issue. Getting confused about business
       | vs personal vs joint and sending the wrong notice to the wrong
       | address.
        
       | dbajaj wrote:
       | ah, wished it had email forwarding while it was disabled
        
       | godelski wrote:
       | Hello, WhatsApp? I'd like to report a stolen phone. Please
       | deactivate the account for ^\\+?\d{1,3}[-.\s]?\\(?\d{1,3}\\)?[-.\
       | s]?\d{1,4}[-.\s]?\d{1,4}[-.\s]?\d{1,9}$
       | 
       | k thx bye
       | 
       | https://xkcd.com/327/
        
         | ploum wrote:
         | I don't know how I should feel about the fact that I did know
         | what xkcd comic would open before I even clicked the link.
         | 
         | https://ploum.net/xkcds-law/index.html
        
           | 0_____0 wrote:
           | Bobby Tables, his arms wide.
        
             | TheSpiceIsLife wrote:
             | I really appreciated this, thank you.
        
             | ilovecurl wrote:
             | Shaka. When the tables fell.
        
         | mellosouls wrote:
         | Inspired the companies house injection attempt discussed here
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27815396
        
       | 1vuio0pswjnm7 wrote:
       | https://web.archive.org/web/20230717202207if_/https://twitte...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-07-17 23:00 UTC)