[HN Gopher] A Tribute to the Compucolor II (2013)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       A Tribute to the Compucolor II (2013)
        
       Author : susam
       Score  : 24 points
       Date   : 2023-07-16 01:04 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (compucolor.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (compucolor.org)
        
       | philipswood wrote:
       | I had one of these as a child.
       | 
       | They were awesome.
       | 
       | I still think there is a place for basic-with-linenumbers for
       | teaching beginners.
       | 
       | One of the most awesome things about it was that when you
       | switched it on it just powered up and was a computer. It dropped
       | you straight into a prompt.
        
         | bitwize wrote:
         | I think that's one of the big features of old 8-bit micros that
         | I'm saddest to see is gone. You turn them on and start
         | programming. Today, you don't need to program a computer, it
         | comes loaded with things to do, many of them already running,
         | some that may work against you... and it has an app store full
         | of other such things! But back then, computers were for
         | programming like pencils were for writing with. Writing and
         | then running programs was _what you did_ with a computer. Sure,
         | you could load someone else 's program... but you had to _tell_
         | the system to load it before it could... even exist in the
         | computer 's memory.
        
         | teddyh wrote:
         | Any BASIC which lacks user-defined named subroutines (i.e. real
         | functions, not DEF FN) is a _terrible_ language, _especially_
         | for beginners:
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35220605
        
           | renewedrebecca wrote:
           | The point in BASIC shouldn't be to really teach programming,
           | but just give a kid the thrill of being able to type in
           | something and seeing a computer do it after typing 'RUN'.
           | 
           | You don't need named subroutines for that, at all.
        
             | teddyh wrote:
             | Some BASICs _did_ have named functions. Reportedly, The BBC
             | Micro one was an early example, and later BASICs on, say,
             | Atari ST, Amiga and later BASICs on MS-DOS _all_ had them.
        
           | pinewurst wrote:
           | Don't forget a borrow checker and probably lambdas too. :)
           | 
           | BASIC - original BASIC - was designed to get people
           | programming computers for fun and work, with little or no
           | weight given to understanding 'computer science'. After a
           | long career devoted to the latter, I respond 'pfooey!' to
           | that.
        
             | teddyh wrote:
             | Have you ever tried to write a BASIC program for any
             | practial purpose? I have. It's an excercise in mental
             | fortitude, trying to remember whatever GOSUB 11600 meant,
             | and what global variables were used as input and which ones
             | were altered as an effect of calling the subroutine.
             | 
             | Named user-defined functions is essential for any program
             | longer than a screenful of text.
        
               | reaperducer wrote:
               | _Have you ever tried to write a BASIC program for any
               | practial purpose? I have. It's an excercise in mental
               | fortitude, trying to remember whatever GOSUB 11600 meant,
               | and what global variables were used as input and which
               | ones were altered as an effect of calling the
               | subroutine._
               | 
               | I wrote business software back when people did such
               | things in BASIC. It was no big deal.
        
         | pinewurst wrote:
         | I remember seeing one at a computer store and being totally
         | envious as a Commodore PET owner. I continue to be impressed
         | with the ethos of Kemeny and Kurtz.
        
       | hungryforcodes wrote:
       | This is awesome. I had no idea this machine existed.
        
       | bitwize wrote:
       | Compucolor! That 8-bit, retro computer... I've never heard of!
       | 
       | Discovering old obscure platforms like this is really a treat.
       | It's like a peek into an alternate universe of computing. What
       | did people do with these? Did they use them for games? Things
       | like inventory and payroll? Solving engineering problems? Getting
       | online with like CompuServe? Did their users communicate with
       | each other? Was there a boutique industry for software?
       | 
       | Of course we know all about these things for the "winners", your
       | Apples, Commodores, and Sinclairs. But what was the "scene" like
       | for the Compucolors and Videobrains? The ones that maybe moved a
       | few tens of thousands of units?
        
         | flyinghamster wrote:
         | There are so many might-have-beens it's almost insane. The one
         | I drooled over in my youth was the Heathkit H11, a DEC
         | LSI-11/23 packaged as a Heathkit. Since my high school had an
         | 11/34, it would have been a good fit, but common sense
         | prevailed and my dad got an Apple II instead (as all his
         | coworkers had them as well).
         | 
         | In practice, there was enough in common between BASIC-PLUS and
         | Applesoft that you could mostly treat the Apple's BASIC as a
         | subset.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-07-17 23:01 UTC)